HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (2027)Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 1:34 PM
To:
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
Subject:
FW: Support for Pond Restoration at Vistoso Nature Trails and Objection to recent
claims by Archeology Southwest
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From:Susann Ventzke
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2026 3:31 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Support for Pond Restoration at Vistoso Nature Trails and Objection to recent claims by Archeology Southwest
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Please see my letter attached hereto.
Scan 20260329.tiff
Susann Ventzke
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writinct to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this oroiect relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation, it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerelv.
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 1:34 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: support for proposed development oracle and suffolk
From: Efrain Cubillc
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2026 8:03 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: support for proposed development oracle and suffolk
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
[This(eCkil
is the first time you received an email from this sender cubillopisapain com). Exercise caution when clicking links, opening
ttachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Dear Councilmember, I was present at the neighborhood meeting regarding the rezoning and conditional
use permit for the 4.7-acre property at N. Oracle Road and W. Suffolk Drive. As I did make a public
comment in favor of the project, I would like to share a few more details based on my decision to favor
this project. I am an interventional pain physician, and our practice (The Pain Institute of Southern
Arizona) has served the southern Arizona community for over 20 years. I have been fortunate to have
been with the group going on the last 10 years and we have recently decided to expand into Oro Valley.
We are building a 15,000 sq foot state of the art clinic and Ambulatory Surgical Center on Linda Vista and
Oracle. Our decision to expand into Oro Valley came from having many patients drive from Oro Valley
and Saddlebrook to our clinics southeast, which can be a 90 minute round trip. Our group saw this as
trulyfulfilling the need to reach our patients closerto their place of residence and not have to drive 90
minutes round trip when in pain. In other words, we were fulfilling the need of this type of business in Oro
Valley. This history of fulfilling the need I see similar to the proposed project on Oracle and Suffolk. As
our practice has recruited providers (both doctors and advanced practice providers), most with families
have hesitation to move to Oro Valley due to not having enough family friendly locations for activities with
their children. Parents are looking for indoor facilities where their child can develop both physically and
mentally. We have had providers in Safford bypass Southern Arizona and drive the extra time to Phoenix
to take their children to facilities like KTR. This development would fulfill the need of hundreds of families
in Southern Arizona and beyond. The proposed project would influence more families to move to Oro
Valley, allow families to create long term bonds and truly make a meaningful difference in the lives of our
children in Southern Arizona. In addition to the previously mentioned points, this will also enhance the
economic development in Oro valley as there is truly nothing like KTR in all of Southern Arizona.
Best
Dr. Efrain Cubillo
2.
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for -Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in pars." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley esident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: CHRIS WESTERMEYER
Sirois, Andrea
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 1:30 PN
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: PLEASE SIGN LETTER TO OV TOWN COUNCIL - ACTION REQUESTED
OV-Pond-Please help with this Eye Sore Document 2026-03-30.pdf
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 1:57 PM
To: Vistoso Highlands Homeowners Association (Numberl) <noreply@goenumerate.com>; Town Council
<co u nci I @o rova I I eyaz.gov>
Subject: Re: PLEASE SIGN LETTER TO OV TOWN COUNCIL - ACTION REQUESTED
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (cwestermever(a�comcast.netl. Exercise caution when clicking links,
opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
See Attached. Shame on Archeology SW. Would they want this scar in their neighborhood. NO ... so
lets fix this eye sore. It's time. Shameful that Archeology SW would even consider doing this.
Chris Westermeyer
On 03/30/20261:27 PM MST Vistoso Highlands Homeowners Association (Numberl)
<noreplyCc>eoenumerate com> wrote:
Vistoso Highlands Homeowners Power ed
By
Association (Numberl) Enumerate
Central
DearVH#1 Neighbor,
For years, our community has advocated for the restoration of the pond at the entrance to our
neighborhood (Vistoso Highlands Dr. and Rancho Vistoso Blvd) within the Vistoso Nature Trails
Preserve. In 2025, the Town Council finally voted to fund the pond restoration design based on
strong community support. The design drawings are now complete, and the Town has received
official bids for the project.
However, the easement holder of the Preserve, Archaeology Southwest, is now opposing the
restoration based on claims regarding the use of reclaimed water. These claims lack scientific
and legal merit, especially as the Town of Oro Valley owns 36 holes of public golf courses that
utilize reclaimed water for their ponds and irrigation. Without a significant showing of public
support, this opposition may delay the project for several more years. Please see the attached
link from the Explorer for the backstory on this.
The Town has already invested significant resources into this restoration. We must now urge
the Mayor and Town Council to move forward. To assist, please print the attached letter, sign it,
scan and email it as soon as possible to the Council at: councit0orovalleyaz.Hov.
It is vital to send this letter before any upcoming public meetings. We also encourage you to
attend these meetings in person to underscore the importance of this project. Restoring the
pond is essential to addressing the current blight and protecting our property values.
Thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
VH#1 Board of Directors
For questions or comments, please reply to this email or contact Vistoso Highlands Homeowners Association (Numbert) at
norep(y(ftoenumerate.com. This email was generated by the Enumerate Central platform.
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town' Council,
I 'am writing to. express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails N
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology $out- N
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of
law, science, -and the Town's authority:
re
1. Misuse -of RegulatoryStandards: The attempt to apply ;a -drinking water standar_ of
4 parts per trillion .to a. non -potable. pond is. factually irrelevant. This ;pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading wh h
,removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly ,regulah
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds a$ hazardi
substances under CERCLA_does not prohibit its beneficial reuse .in managed water,
features, like those used in parks and golf courses 'throughout Oro Valley and Arizo
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology .Southwest
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regard
-the allocation of funds for Town .projects ate matters .of `public policy and governana
not easement compliance.
:4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
.allows for the restoration of the former irrigation ;pond "in whole or in part." This proje
is not :e violation; it: is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in atown park that
enhances the parks scenic and recreational values.
`urge the Council -to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established. standards ratherthan rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 1:29 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Vistoso Highland Pond Restoration
Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve.pdf
From: Steven Greenberg
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 2:05 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Highland Pond Restoration
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (steven.greenberg5070a-gmail.com). Exercise caution when clicking
links, opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
Please find attached my letter voicing our support for restoration of
the Vistoso Nature Preserve Pond. Left as is I feel the pond is not
only aesthetically displeasing but is a danger and liability to the
community.
Steven Greenberg
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water. Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, .like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; -it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in. a town park that
enhances the parWs scenic and recreational values,
urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to .restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Vall Re id nt
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law,. science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely_, _
Oro Valley Resident
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
1 am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
I Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely, off✓ ��„���
Oro Valley Resident
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I any writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed li'9iater: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
G�/s2
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 1:28 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Restoration of Preserve Pond
HOA letter 1.pdf
From: R. L. DeBakf.
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 4:24 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Restoration of Preserve Pond
a
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name (R. L. DeBake) is different from their email address (sun2seaaz@gmai1.com), which may indicate an
impersonation attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before replying or
taking further action.
Attached is my signed letter of support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve Pond
Robin Lynn DeBake
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
1 am writing to express my sarong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant_ This pond is -not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Ciro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance. 01
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whale or in park." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
aft'_ r
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 1:28 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Rancho Vistoso Pond
IMG_5898.jpeg; ATT00001.txt
From: Cindy Seely
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 4:28 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Rancho Vistoso Pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name (Cindy Seely) is different from their email address (cindklausCa?aol.com), which may indicate an
impersonation attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before replying or
taking further action.
Can we please get this resolved once and for all we've waited six years all promises no results thank you.
Dear MayorWrllfieK#nd Members of the. Town Council,
I. am Writ!ng,:fo express my strong support far the resloretk n of",/istoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly addiress recent claims madn•by Amhaaalvgy. SoUthwest.
Tice opposition to this project -relies on several fundament.al mischaraoteriaatiOpS,of the
lays►, science, and. the 7owWs authority.,
1. Misuse af ft tilkary SUnclar=ds; The. attempt to apply. a drinking water stendatd.of�
4 part per trillion to a non -potable pond is facwlually. irmWant. This pond is not for
human consumption. and Town regulations,stric tly prohlbit swimming or wading, which
removes -primary expasure pathways,
2:-Lawful Wo of Raclalr ►d "Water. Reclaimed -water is, a sta milord; -highly regulated
resource. In Arizona. The EPA"s +do*natlon of certain PEAS compounds. as hazardous
suhstances under CERCLA does not �prohibil: its beneficial muse in managed water
features. like thane used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and'Arizonm
3: L,aak af. 6Wdgatsry-0vs*rWght As the easement holder, Ardhaeofty Southwest has,
no legal authority to demand.or didtate municipal budget priorities, Decisions regarding.
the allocation of funds for Town projects,sre matters of pubfc..poliay► and governance,
not easement compliance.
4..Fxplfalt Authorization: OaragMph 2.6 of the Conservation Eawnerrt explicitly
allows for the restoration of the: former irrigation pond In whole or in ,part.' This project
is not a violation; it Is a restoration of $.historic landscape feature In a town park that
enhances the pick`s scenic and ►eavatlonal,values..
urga.the Council to conlinue,wilhy the.approyed,plan to resstora this Vaal community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and.
,exaggerated!- claims,
SincereIX,
Cro,
.. 'J X4f
aa �4
= '4
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 1:25 PM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond
Council Ltr.pdf
From: Don Malen,
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 8:05 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond
IWARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Dear Council -
Please see my attached letter expressing my strong support for the subject pond. The delays and foot
dragging and roadblocks have gone on for too long! Move forward with this project!!
Don Malene
VH#1 Resident
1
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards. The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance.
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation, it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
ncerely,
V Ma6�
Oro Valley Resident
ff"'Morn. s,,.:
ow n eyr,i.
Memo.randum Oro
dU 'ic
from.0,Richard .Beam, Or"6 Valley; .Arizona ;
_`0.,ct9f`e
1q, 0.Lqgq.".8a_sJs-.f6r Restoeingthe" o7rP *hj 'R �hd, #er
bate:U'arch,80,4
Dear Mayor:andCouncil ,Members;
Aecent:comft!ehtar -.s
y;,regarding tM, JroobsOdlestb(oflOn 6f.the"Visto o Trails. Naturia;Preserve pond:
p P,
'bf-'(OClairii�dWatd'e.'I�offerthl5,,",memorandum,.,.to;
r' -Us
bas' raised f�, policy and 4 `41 p.icy-co.,de n- .0
JseAim U
clarify �en le Jeaov�orkj.,-addr'esi tihecla'ims',,ra' 'd-b-Aeth logyS6 thwest,,,60,0 plaih..w.h
y
�refllIin -o fdoth'reclaimed water i b6ihAawfU(,and- e6nsistent WithAho conservation'easement:
.Executive:SummaN
Rkstdrki s' gr liegal[y permissible and .alighod with.on bo f the 'his otic Vist-&- pond u i, n e claimed water,is
licitI
d''c onse e,. The easement eXpl I '' authorizes.
Atb.i �Oasempnif's_--elxpress terms.an rVa lon.purp6�
r irrigation 8tion P' c -eitallyfelied -obleclaimedwzite Jhe;
restoration of the forme i , ond,whi h.bisto r.
9:
`hkardous..'' su bstance,clause 4oes. not prohibit.1his use because -re laimed water' is_.,,a,regu
;
-municioM`Utility product; ot.6. form of -hazardous -was
te` disposal- Established principles: of easement,
o' ron Ak_
4*hfPrprk6fi' * n ..'sti gly-suopoil the TPwP-"-5.,PQ$l Qo-
LeplTrinciples
"KIPYI
;:SPR permission controls.
The 'easement expressly
csslVauihorizes restoration.of the former A.Irrigation -Pdhd.ThNspspecific, negotiated
permission controls over generalprohibitions,including the hazardous -substance Jause Historlica -use def nes permissible use;;
I as -part 0, the Vist' Golf was: maintained " with reclaimed
The pond existed 'so .0,ex e e Q ,Coprse.and a
--§oukej� a,�tohtinuation o e
water. Re's't"or'i,ng,.,it-.using .t'ai-he..w er f the historic condition the
easement was designed to preserve..
4:1 1
IReclaimed water is. not hazardous-wasto,dis osal.
The' Jeasement prohibits .the'`storage,
. tagp,:dqmping, or,
disposal'.'
of haza,rdou,
s-tubstAndes. Usib0
_
reclaimed _water f6r;-a.beneficial, permittod,purpose .does :not oonstitA .'disposal. Courts dist,
inguish
between . intentional waste disposal and, the incidental presehce o-f regulated su
bstances withi'n'(0wfqj
ptod-utts.,
PEAS o. alter
EPA!s -designation of, r, CERC LA tarciets .industriilpolluters, not municip
al reclaimed water
systems. Reclaimed water:reman5 IAWfPf.and teaul'a_ied for -use i , n ponds,irrigation; and recharge.
�_
Amb 1166itles-favor-th.e1a'ndowher'.,
_
If :any ambi uit
... exists,, tourresolve it againstlNe.,easetent holder.66d.,n:favoroftNe Ian'd.oner-s
4
--grounded, and
$,0. ThOTOWO.', bti�;' historically;
;grounded, d,.use is reasonable;, s
conservatidh-bri.dhted.--.
Polk - -Cons.l.d.e.railtion.s.
Y
:EOkrqinmentall stewardship.: d' -enit..,
"I �hcl improves., Oc .,_gjca, n
t d, -diversity, sb ' . - -..- and
nhances�h6bftai pports wi. d I ife
'PT91- ppQq
t ue ,of . t h preserve.
, ;olv -
V"WAIS-OftAll .ability Aifitv;,:
bl6sourceformaintaining. "a
reclaimed Wtt r only viable,,npo--pqt!,a
Jha desert biivirohin, q
,pqnd without,comp6tih9- with potable supplies.
Communh ex ectaflons.
Residents supported a�quISM 0ft��prppery.Wiih.,the,undet�taridi'ng,th the
e,6fidWQ4--
-.
Risk, M " -a n" - -a 9"'d Ft. 9, f i t..
PPAS, levels in reclaim- &Wziterare Itb6nd. Th6.Town retains full
e to
authority to qIgpqge and mie igit
,.:anyfiitur.6�,con'cerns..
S uthwestlls, Claims.
to Archaeology o. _V,
Ci PPA$ I II reclaimed water -v'iolaies,-.the,hazar.d*ous=subst-anc6-i:li�Lis6'.
-
ftsoo_ n-1-se-e-71, 0,,.clause :addresses ;disposal of hazaruswasteiUsing reclaimed water for a- Permit .. ted,
.benefici6l"put0o's'e:-is'.'hdt. dis"ll bsjl.
.C.Ilaimi: Evapor6tion could create a ' "hazardousste _.t0ssijo6l.*
' . Wea
Response: This '"ts.speculative.'The.,eas6m'e-nt,regU.la-te-'sadibrit,ii-dt''hypdthOt,iOI.f...t r6swn.'aribs,..The
--,-,d'd future Coriclitions-' n
Town can if necessary without violating the easement-.
. .- �, _. Y . _ without
t aimed`WateCq purpose:'CL( :conflicts pOrpose
Response: Tlie :easement explicitly 't pqhd restor#i_oq,-:.,and the ppnd historically used
:reclaimed-Wa-tOrAn ekph?sSW,p&nittbd'us0 cannot be rechpractenzed.as inconsistent with the,
-easement's
rpp$e.
dilm: Federal; eral",-. PF,44.- designation :automatically triggers the4 prohibition.'.
.,e a g.ea,sOme'".6tor, fion',
R0$pppt,C._'$qhah interpretation would render lhe.,easement unworkable. �yprohibitin
9'laWfU!,
:dedin 'OmOM Ora
dtice
-'C.14.jfiv The; Ops�ornetifhdlder M. oy,.veto.rec-'Iaii-hedw,atd'r' use:
,Easement holders enforce fhe._a grqement_.-as written::
yddidt'Oss.
AUftr'ity-to.:nullilys'00 K.JP.erSI through g. xpap�iver ..ipter.pre ati6h,--,Of .96neraI.- c laUS' 6
Recommendation
hisio'n-a common
ttinc, � n4 - ,
.1 1 .. j 'h"' I o ld.'Uit"Wifilhd
Thelown is_:-fiot proposing ' A n.dw or,&ouw Oto; It " proposing t
9 nrestore.a� ist r u
is .,,o
'When g,�
it e� d Opgades, and in ',wayth- -,t-"-expressly allows. , . pqpe!yqtiQn'
fine a e easerrien., �.,_,
ease
hOht contains bptb a;.sppCl 1C.. permission anda general prohibition,
"ThOlow'r uIr
the speq C
p&fM"itsi hlo-4 htrOj I �QthOise-J'hO.permission becomes meaningl_essi
'F . these -kL�td.r4thoN'pqqd with reclaimed '' "water
'is lqgally efensibk environmertaill1resp hsibie,:And)dohtMOt-
.,..' community's eet4ti6as. respectfully
recommend i.hqf.the 'C'ri14p o.ceedwfthrestd
ration..
i 600 B .... .. M-04
p ., ea - - 0
`Chief Environmental t 'retired) Providence
Health
Arizona
.Supporting Case Low
, - - .__ li - .'
ofsovernedovener6l"prohibitions, Specific_per.M*$J.' n
'Courts ton"S'8befitIV hold fhat-.'When aneasOMeht.,.Cont6ihs both --a-s
Pkift affirmative
:authcflzation-,a'n'd,a, rilicirloh,'t I he.' specific. permission
• Ri?statemdnt-(Thied)'df e
.Prop - rty. -,,-Serv4u;(0s 04.1 cmi.:d
to the. parties` i-;%d, iht6n and specift gi�qnts
..Co'uqs. iriter.prefservitudes to give effect e
,are,nothUIl'ffi'e" 'b- b y..- roadly-yv9rded'restrictions: rietibils.-
*,
P� -City 0 Paiadend _v.'California-M ;hldqn.-'Land.& Water Co., 17 C81.2d 5.7,6,,5!-940(1'9*)
Easements -,Awebriatued to-give,-oftett-l'" the` purpose expr ssl' tate in t e grant,
_.:..p, .._q,pprp e y,s d h general
language :cannot be read to ddfdcit aapocific,,,-abthorl nation...
ii- kiss Ppsth 610,,' 39-40'(201.8)
for a.l. A 6
Courts: -will 'not -interpret ,,easement's in a manner that enders'..an vxpre ss grant .....
meaningless Of
,surplusage..
Appjkdetm; The easement's express authotizatio-n to restore the, pond .cannot be,overridden by
generalized hazardous -substance d"withoutause nollifyinthL permission
2. Historical ;use ,,,define,!5.-Permis-sible, scope.
-' e
0 rjqjy-.jqqXAo. existimand hktdricalt 4dltlOhOtAhO:tliM9 ah e' rgpi dto,
permissible;,
dete'er-M ne'."W
;Rye, v., T rhae ,Truckee Sierra Desposol Co:,
222 Ca A
e -'I use..:,:a and;
-Whdeb n easement Is jhl'cg00e0 terms,, its. scopels. stablished b bMdflica
htd-.the-,Odttieis,.,
ilhe.conditibns''-,kn ' -' Ow
'Pallowfleld 'V,,: BQurgaiiit,,.'20'.63.,Ca-nLiI 4266 (00t. C.A.
I_nature
turo,,and q� pfq ;--f Anease_mj
erit,,afr,e-,deternined'by the ,c rcum stab ces'exist-ing. at the
time, of the g(an and kn-
the parties:,
Application: Because Use.the Vittoso pond ;historically "PXI �8nd was withreclai med`water,
restoring same -manneft-6hstitUtOs continuation `8 ta.61 js`h,,e.- "d j pqrm-__c.-j-
3. te lial t �Nld-p
ful,u materials W. se -of regulated.ma
La
Courts -distinguish between intentional disposalofhadardauswaste an .- h-e -I0on'.presence. of O� ' 'be ikts-,orac6lW6esl
r,eg,u'Wud,.-uidh$tAfwe!9 -Withih IM
I ,
,BNSF.RdUWdyCo.'V,jWto b ......
Liability urder hazarddus-s'WOhc requires intentiona disposal, n_ot.me e-presence
within lawful,
'-Iawf;4(,p operations:
. -
"C,.U6jrborIV4149ggi,Lid:v.tinocalCorp.j.',270';F.*3d,',,863,.,.8,7,8479-(9thC' h'
f6duket active i
human. .cconduct, passive ,
lualify.
Application: ,Using reclaimed water fora pOrmAtOd pond "storage; Oqmping,,'�or disposal"bf,
pqfi- � Js not
I hOz-ar4qysj-$. st,ances.wit'hin'the.meanihlg,6f.,a'h-�ea's'-e'mentt.,gsteitti3Oh,.
4. Lkee
regulatory :Clatsific
.
• Unified Sidfes v. Bestfoods,524:U U.S. 51, 66 '(19-98)
operations"-4 sent
fhVirpnmep. a_ la'W,ful, regulated
..,t.,I,.,�;8tutes."�-tqrg�ptres.,pQ.n,sible,.,,cond'u4�.'nbt
intent1,o,,,-di-
...$_ - P.J
• Adpah Uh 4. os 14 Wd States,, 5 TU2.
-.Couris,reject 'intert)rdtati'�o'n"s""-�thatwould: produce sweeping, impractical, -;prohibitions qn.routine wand :use;,
-
APOO 'PtAg des!gnation 149der,CERCLA, does,.,not convert m uh iqpa-ift"i- i ec aj(_n#d water into
roh.ibitodhAzdrdous,,waste.fpr,purppsog of conserva-tion',easement:
Ambiguities ware resolved in
of of -Ianownervs6
W -pasementlangu. Ut6sb4V6. I " against the,easerne ,. holder ,and in
pOrp-m-- d v_ asonable nestrudi' `Iand,utLa.
Cj*pLos , Angeles. 244 -CalApp.2d,538,542--43,.-(1-566)
qnt on'land ,use are stnctly trued- ambiguities are, resolved 6d to permitbh4blk
.use'.
beyond �37C LA 4th 697,702 '995)'
Sq V� Viqtq4.e'Gr"qpevM 1n6j, a4pp.-
hq.notbi�i �',impbs'_6 burdens _-_O-'hdthqs 't WV:expressed;
7-A. .Ioue_ld interpreted to
qf.
f
vedinlpvor
Appflia-Apo'm -'U- bb :f.&W V. tho, TOW,
_py uncertainty regarding redaim'ed'wat r rn st,
T jsb.h - biq�_�fo i�� 'Id d h Oi
e a or- 0Py',g.rQL_jq__e._..
6. absurd or .peW-d,ofooti-ng''iiftdrp I relt - at ion's
tburts avoid'.Absu
+C6ufts-refuse "interpretations th6t.'negate: .6*0rp6trhissibos..'or defeat -a.peasement's stated
'purTP
C'v. Codef -1643 (contract ;iiiterpr,6t6t!on'orihciole).
A:tOntract rr!4$t_e:interpreted ao:.make,=it ,law.ful,;,operative,:an.d reasonable.
ZWfdrV.,SdWde, 29 c_M'App..,5th,at,640,
Courts -:avoid constructions that .ender portions ion�of,,oneasement meaningless,
Wss.
AppIlicatioitiniet reting the -,h-a'2.a'ed,dtis-s-Obst�abito,,. 14U;prohibit.-reclaimed - water would. .-defeat
the. express.. pond-r-rest,prati.on permission -and - Ubder-minie the 68dmehfs, conservation P)QfpOse:
This StrengtheCouncWls ion.,
,How ns-the �- Posit
Wish that:
T.hes�e,�,,-C'a-s6s�,t6ileciive'ly-esta.
ThO basemen,,sovfeckpond-lettoration pqrmission controls..
Mitorical reclaimed-water'use Matters WON.
Reclaimed ,water is a"lavVful utilityproduct, not hgzardoUs-wpstp.-Oispq"II
-de§'ignatiqri does noi,retroactively bar .permitted uses.
• Any ambiguity must b'-e-.-rds'o*IVe.d - in favor of the Town..
:Thisbody of IaW, ptacds--the". TdWh, on firm legpl,grpund and iharpl',limits,the credibility,bf a
:contrary interpretation.
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 12:53 PM
To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject: FW: The case to refill the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve pond with reclaimed water
Attachments: Memo to town council re vistoso pond.pdf, RESPONSE TO KGUN ARTICLE ON VISTOSO
POND WATER.pdf
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Richard Beam
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 12:35 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: The case to refill the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve pond with reclaimed water
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Attached, is a memorandum that argues in favor of.the town council voting to refill the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve Pond. Also attached is a rebuttal letter to a post by Kenny Darr, KGUN9, 3/24/26, regarding claims by
Archeology Southwest that would prohibit filling the pond with reclaimed water.
Conclusion: Restoring the Vistoso Pond is both legal and right for our community.
Sincerely,
Richard Beam
Oro Valley Resident
Response to article: V stoso Trails Nature ;Preserve by Kenny
Darr; arch.:U,20,41P
Restoring the hstoso Pond: -a.,,. -Off rOur Obiftmunity
.Legal an`, Right .-..I
o c ievemehO�a,
."so 14
On'e:-of,Or V,4116v. s. greatesta- h
conh- or"effort omt"e-penspce"wi if tNeJ,na.bjfW,beaut
y d
61 vi
me.,Ai,,i.hL-,!.h,e-�t'r't,.-�of"th'atlind's former
TII§tO$0:Golf ,,.,Course: 90$tO6 h --th d" `tjqst, ,c- amb" Ampro* nt; it axetur tothe ecological„arid
_P veme n
haracter that resrdentsfought topreserve.:
-
ehave ar-f 0,0 ore :the because it. - -jaw.tandffie:
-,�,. both 0
contain ",trat'argument misunderstands
;,putpdge bhjie conservation easement;.
The -ej mot -ex ".plic1fly-Alaws -iheTowntq,--.,restprp the ,.ppnO. That pond- existed fdr-'-, 'd,&4d6$
and was always"Ae
filled -with r&l4ftfiW'.` 6r6 I is not -a -h-OW
11 .
use=it is the
ye
ars. ,,Conservation-
,
-6As&ffiftt$grejnt r tod:`based on historic cond.fflons, and the'-hist6ficc'oiiditidh.,,h6t6 is
:Th,e,cla'im'thzit.reclaimi!d--water violates .'.the.e' --a-se-"-m'-.,"o--P--t.s'.,Ih
azarckpus�- st 00-dau5_6' jequally Zs
- _
Misplaced. TIio d4ugo-Vtisdesl, V- n dumping; d waste stdra0,.n,6ti.t6
gap industrial ping, an.,..
lot -the"use :of ' regulated municipalreclaimed .w-'aer�..�ket,'Ia1"medwa'iiatisusi cl;tafel}in:
O .
courses across essential likes. and golf ross Aft es e,esert
environment.
PFASjs_a'nationALissue;but fhepresence of trace".itreclaiv.
ned,-water,.does :no.t
transform its 'use Ixt h z rMpus-wasteiidisposAl. Iftdid, evei ocIaified-:wat& pOhdii!
was
k nor jq easement:
-A -,woui- d- li-e illegal overnight.That:
written.
Restoring --'with-reclaimed-water ' honors t-q;:easeme%t,, suppbrts Wildlife, enhances
- OVO-Iti b!
the ,s
v e.,and-rdIectsthe commtini_�yls vVisio-n-fof- h
r okpe�rienc r. the. pre, both legally
,sound,,and-envirdntn6ritally.�ires-pons , IIJI&ION.T, Iley't dWdj! 06 - forward
.2. RebUttat .to Ar h'6'ebt66-8.0ut:hWest!s'.,,POSITlon
reclaim '.,WaV6rmKQ t-_', 1:TI;�-U$e-A'ViQtationo the hazardous -substance
a
clause:
Rebuttal
The cLa_ Lit ei'ptdhi biM,P :s. to , ra , g , dUMPih'g,.o-rz'dJs` "pqsa.A"of h'*a-z'a*-r-d-ou-s..�sub-st'ance�s.*I�4i-ng.,
disposal":
of
-po,rmitto-d. beneficial purpose Is not disposal, Courts dist ingpish
a V&b r .0
:betlwee-, n-:
inte ion tdispqpa Iof h. v .. azard6dsatt6, and
rqq a. "Li-it'e., d Ubmn eswithin lawful-prpoudt
-ti Its. gb'.,d,Ws'h0t eonsfftute
R,b,dLaifnd.d'w'at6fis. - 1999fok p qjqj'O_ ti pty product:
ftat fd6U9AN4Mh.A.,_ Ong:
CJo"M.v,,"2:'JAFAS' concentration lh. ototioh"w.bt-Ad., ehazardous:A�kste
r t j"
P
This is s000 96xvA "'nsp tP0,JPa4mPnt-:regULatbs,.bctibh9, ldthyOothetlopt
4''
future'to I fuiure-:-qqMd-Ifio'n_ s1eqUie6d ftiitigCIIt'ion,*, e3b.' could', `*odd're.s*'
flog.the .easement. The, e' I water use
enj� .1th,
'g, scenarios:
based ond, pe#q br) er'm s.0'
incompatible with,-Tept
Claim 3• T
qJ Mp'. water:
Rebuttal
Tho,-e- s e-M aXp y perM,its-,-�estor6tiohof"thpond.. The.poh.1ST07p;
'tv used.
reclaimedwater use .,expressly permitted 'bythe 6tit�,-rti.6.ri.t-canno.be. reinterpreted as.
ton rar vwp.
a y o
0 h as hazardous t'oMo qql� pei' _"d, Obft`
_0 _p0spp'.- _ggpT8 the-easement`
-p on,.-..
-00t.-Murizipp" L re
claimed
PiBdorot,desjpation pnOQr',Q9B,!,.
watersystems.:'The,,.-easement,cannOt.t.'66i--son-a'-6t"'Y'-"beinterpreted to, .-1w ny0t6h'de
.6lassiti d' hazardous; inVOU10-000r, 1-fti,ry-taridrman.ageri�drit,Pt6ctid6g
-Pq ous.i,,'btIt.W _'C
ands .contrail fa -the ea"s'emdh-t.!,6,�,ekOLitit-,oe issh;ms.
,C-LdiMB: kd y At na.
te rat ,a uihority tobibbk, reclaimed water,.
AebutWl'
Easement -h6ld6ts e n-f6fd6the bageffiebt. tt 3m, they dopot p spq 'f0ti Ve Io
,aswrr .e c
pOry
-p,qW,pr, Whehtheb6s'Ohrie'At dkp.licjtIy..',O.OrMits'restoration -pl-the--pond Ahe'eas.ementhblddr
cannot n b y ., . e . Jnterp,rot . ing'a general clause in P wby-that rvUtlifids. 6
ti.dh .specific, --_author Jz'a I.
'Wd d iiti"--f6V6'rdfo'(('-OWI'hgr.'Ottaim.edwater',i-n-th�.e- 'Istos OonO,, qst
.,A legally ' e h p
grow. 9 'P_ a
,,on how 'the -conservation easement should be interpreted —not ontoxicology, n
general,water=use pW*_-ThO easement is"..acontradt,and like
the text, the
-6 Iihtentof th.o_.;Partiei�i.'WhOh
C-phtex.-tinhith it:was written,
ot Wri i§'hd,.th
lyhose principles, siroh�_ceto�ene%ea-that..r Idime-d �a qrJ9,,POrni.'0lbke.
:under -the 'easement:
*30
- poniftted.by
Richard.MaM.,M.8k
C fE J_ rnentat,.,.O t hlellnvifon - i iarftetlred),. ProVidericle Health"
ReOiden,i of ,Ofo'Vatft,.Ari'zOha
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 12:20 PM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Restoration / Rancho Vistoso Pond
IMG_4339jpeg; ATT00001.txt
From: BRUCE SEELY
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:45 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Cc: Bruce Seel}
Subject: Restoration / Rancho Vistoso Pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Ia
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (bccslv(&aol.com). Exercise caution when clicking links, opening
ttachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Please make this a priority. This is a sore eye for Oro Valley and the City council.
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council
I am uniting to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nat
Preserve pond and Io directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwe
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations oft
law, science, and the Town's authority.
t. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standarc
4 pans per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant, This pond is not for -
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, whit
removes primary exposure pathways,
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardOL
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like :hose used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest h
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regardin
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement comphanoe-
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2,6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond 'in wWe min part.' This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital communi
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims -
Sincerely,
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Monday, March 23, 2026 8:02 AM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Pond reconstruction.
PSFAs-comment-3-21-26 final.pdf
Follow up
Flagged
From: Michael Kostrzewsl
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2026 4:40 PM
To: Town Council <Council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond reconstruction.
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (m.kosirzewski(a)comcast.net). Exercise caution when clicking links,
opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
March 22, 2026
Town Council
Oro Valley
Council Members,
I see in comments submitted to the Town Council regarding filling the pond on Vistoso Highlands
Drive with reclaimed effluents the allegation that the use of waste water is prohibited by the
Conservation Easement. Specifically, section 3.11, addresses Hazardous material and in this case
the concern is PFSAs. This section does not reference a drinking water standard.
There are Federal rules that govern hazards, i.e., hazardous substances, hazardous materials, and
the handling, transporting, disposal, etc. thereof. These rules are very detailed and complex. The
inference in the comments that the mere presence of one of these PFAS compounds requires the
classification of a hazardous material without reference to the regulations, calculations, if necessary,
and methodology prohibiting the use -of reclaimed wastewater for filling, the pond is questionable. The
consultants designing the pond may be able to assist you if PFAS compounds are truly an issue.
Such materials in the pond may never exceed the concentration leading to a determination of
"Hazardous or Toxic Materials."
Based upon water quality after treatment, ADEQ allows reclaimed wastewater use for beneficial
purposes from watering golf courses, making snow for ski slopes, recreational impoundments
(ponds), and crop irrigation to list some. The Covenant cites Hazardous Material and this has not
been shown, and therefore somewhat questionable.
This pond is not for drinking water purposes. It is also my understanding the pond will not be
managed as a static water body. The consulting firm of Kimley-Horn in the pond design handles water
turnover and aeration.
As for the Tucson Water testing result there are some questions.
• How many samples were analyzed by Tucson Water?
• What are the values and sampling dates for all the samples?
• Were the Tucson Water samples taken before Pima County made upgrades to its treatment
plants, specifically the completion of the new Agua Nueva facility and upgrades to the Tres
Rios facility?
• Is it valid to use only 1 value to make the conclusion presented?
I have attached some information on some key EPA Hazardous Substance Classifications. Then,
there are the regulations and rules for managing these items: As I said, this is complex issue.
I am a retired professional engineer, this is not my current area of expertise but have worked with
Federal hazardous and toxic substance rules in my career.
In discussions with colleagues, I would suggest the Town move forward with the plans to restore the
former irrigation pond and defer to the engineering firm you have hired, and Tucson water to ensure the
reclaimed water you will be utilizing meets all safety standards for its intended use.
Thank you,
Michael Kostrzewski PhD PE
Note: PDF of this response is attached
The EPA maintains several lists of hazardous substances regulated under CERCLA (Superfund),
RCRA, and EPCRA, which include chemicals like asbestos, mercury, benzene, and various
pesticides. These lists, found in 40 CFR 302.4 and 40 CFR 116.4A, identify over 500 chemicals,
including hazardous wastes (P-list/U-list) and toxic pollutants.
Key EPA Hazardous Substance Classifications:
• CERCLA Hazardous Substances: Listed in 40 CFR 302.4, these are designated for reporting
spills and releases, featuring compounds like Aldrin, Allyl alcohol, and Arsenic.
• RCRA Hazardous Wastes: Listed in 40 CFR 261, these include acutely hazardous P-list
chemicals (e.g., Fluorine, Cyanide) and toxic U-list chemicals.
• Extremely Hazardous Substances (EPCRA): Chemicals that pose significant immediate health
risks, often listed in "List of Lists" documents.
• Toxic Air Pollutants: Regulated substances including asbestos, formaldehyde, and various
metals.
Commonly Listed Substances:
• Metals/Compounds: Lead, Mercury, Arsenic.
• Solvents: Benzene, Toluene, Carbon disulfide.
• Other: PCBs, PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances).
3
March 22, 2026
Town Council
Oro Valley
Council Members,
see in comments submitted to the Town Council regarding filling
the pond on Vistoso Highlands Drive with reclaimed effluents the
allegation that the use of waste water is prohibited by the
Conservation Easement. Specifically, section 3.11, addresses
Hazardous material and in this case the concern is PFSAs. This
section does not reference a drinking water standard.
There are Federal rules that govern hazards, i.e., hazardous
substances, hazardous materials, and the handling, transporting,
disposal, etc. thereof. These rules are very detailed and
complex. The inference in the comments that the mere presence
of one of these PFAS compounds requires the classification of a
hazardous material without reference to the regulations,
calculations, if necessary, and methodology prohibiting the use of
reclaimed wastewater for filling the pond is questionable. The
consultants designing the pond may be able to assist you if
PFAS compounds are truly an issue. Such materials in the pond
may never exceed the concentration leading to a determinatio.n
of "Hazardous or Toxic Materials."
Based upon water quality after treatment, ADEQ allows reclaimed
wastewater use for beneficial purposes from watering golf
courses, making snow for ski slopes, recreational impoundments
(ponds), and crop irrigation to list some. The Covenant cites
Hazardous Material and this has not been shown, and therefore
somewhat questionable.
This pond is not for drinking water purposes. It is also my
understanding the pond will not be managed as a static water
body. The consulting firm of Kimley-Horn in the pond design
handles water turnover and aeration.
As for the Tucson Water testing result there are some questions.
• How many samples were analyzed by Tucson Water?
• What are the values and sampling dates for all the samples?
• Were the Tucson Water samples taken before Pima County
made upgrades to its treatment plants, specifically the
completion of the new Agua Nueva facility and upgrades to the
Tres Rios facility?
• Is it valid to use only 1 value to make the conclusion
presented?
have attached some information on some key EPA Hazardous
Substance Classifications. Then, there are the regulations and
rules for managing these items. As I said, this is complex issue.
I am a retired professional engineer, this is not my current area of
expertise but have worked with Federal hazardous and toxic
substance rules in my career.
In discussions with colleagues, I would suggest the Town move
forward with the plans to restore the former irrigation pond and
defer to the engineering firm you have hired, and Tucson water to
ensure the reclaimed water you will be utilizing meets all safety
standards for its intended use.
Thank you,
Michael Kostrzewski PhD PE
The EPA maintains several lists of hazardous substances
regulated under CERCLA (Superfund), RCRA, and EPCRA, which
include chemicals like asbestos, mercury, benzene, and various
pesticides. These lists, found in 40 CFR 302.4 and 40 CFR
116.4A, identify over 500 chemicals, including hazardous wastes
(P-list/U-Iist) and toxic pollutants.
Key EPA Hazardous Substance Classifications:
• CERCLA Hazardous Substances: Listed in 40 CFR 302.41
these are designated for reporting spills and releases,
featuring compounds like Aldrin, Allyl alcohol, and Arsenic.
• RCRA Hazardous Wastes: Listed in 40 CFR 261, these
include acutely hazardous P-list chemicals (e.g., Fluorine,
Cyanide) and toxic U-list chemicals.
• Extremely Hazardous Substances (EPCRA): Chemicals that
pose significant immediate health risks, often listed in "List
of Lists" documents.
• Toxic Air Pollutants: Regulated substances including
asbestos, formaldehyde, and various metals.
Commonly Listed Substances:
• Metals/Compounds: Lead, Mercury, Arsenic.
• Solvents: Benzene, Toluene, Carbon disulfide.
• Other: PCBs, PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances).
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2026 12:29 PM
To: Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
Subject: FW: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve pond area reconstruction contract
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Kenneth Hustac
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2026 11:46 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Cc: Carol Hustad <cshustad@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve pond area reconstruction contract
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Oro Valley Town Council:
My wife and I own two properties near Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve (VTNP) including ourwinter home. Back in 2022,
we contributed to help save the 202 acre former golf course and pond area from development. We are now expecting
that the pond restoration and revegetation project at VTNP that was approved by the Oro Valley Town Council last
November will get started as planned and budgeted for this spring and be finished bythis fall.
Archaeology Southwest's (AS's) recent attempt to delay or derail the project by insisting that only potable water be used
for the pond is totally unfounded. To be blunt, AS does not know what they are talking about. Their March 19, 2026
open letter to town residents misconstrues federal water quality regulations and demonstrates that they do not
understand the pond design or how it will operate.
- The Federal EPA regulations cited by AS only apply to drinking water. They do not apply to the reclaimed waste water
that will be used for the VTNP pond. As you know, reclaimed water is commonly used for ponds and turf irrigation
at parks, ball fields and golf courses.
For more information please see:
bttos•//www epa. ov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-subate nces-pfas
- The new pond will not be "STATIC" as AS alleges. The design incorporates three separate systems to circulate, aerate
and pump water out to an adjacent recreational turf area and to the restored native vegetation areas of the old golf
course. The bottom of the pond will be completely lined to prevent ground water infiltration and pond leakage.
I am writing to strongly encourage you to keep our project on track.
Please award the contract to rebuild our beautiful pond and begin the revegetation of the former golf course.
We all have been waiting long enough.
Thank you for your attention.
Regards,
Kenneth Hustad
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Charles Stad
Sirois, Andrea
Friday, March 20, 2026 3:48 PM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Letter to Town of Oro Valley about Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve pond project
Open Letter to Oro Valley.pdf
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2026 3:45 PM
Cc: Epting, Rosalyn <repting@orovalleyaz.gov>; Abraham, Peter <pabraham@orovalleyaz.gov>; Winfield, Joe
<jwinfield@orovalleyaz.gov>; Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; Alexander F. Ball John
Welch <jwelch@archaeologysouthwest.org>; Barrett, Melanie <mbarrett@orovalleyaz.gov>;
jmchugh@tucsonlocalmedia.com; Odeski, Cherie <caodeski@orovalleyaz.gov>; Charles Stack
Wilkins, Jeff <jwilkins@orovalleyaz.gov>; Cornelison, Chris <ccornelison@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Letter to Town of Oro Valley about Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve pond project
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Dear Colleagues:
As the former EPAC-PAG Advisor to Town of Oro Valley, I believe that this is a very important issue that is
not being properly addressed by the Town Council.
This letter follows up the story that was recently published on the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve pond
project by Mr. Dave Perry:
As always, I am available to discuss this at nQcoat to any official of the TOV if you contact me.
The situation with PFAS in the US is very similar to past environmental problems including DDT, PCB and
asbestos, where a formerly benign -appearing chemical was suddenly discovered to have severe
environmental and health risks. TOV maybe exposed to significant legal and financial risks with this
project as proposed.
My hope is that TOV will halt the bidding process until all of the outstanding issues with this pond project
are addressed.
Have a nice weekend, Chuck
Charles R. Stack, MPH, BCES
EPAC-PAG Representative ex officio Town of Oro Valley
Archaeology Southwest Exploring and protecting heritage places while honoring their diverse values
Letter to Oro Valley: Nature Preserve Is No Place for a Hazardous Materials Waste Dump
March 19, 2026
Dear Residents of the Town of Oro Valley and To Whom it May Concern:
Archaeology Southwest again encourages the Town of Oro Valley to reverse its plans to use
PFAS-laden, reclaimed wastewater to fill the proposed 2.5-acre pond in the Vistoso Trails
Nature Preserve. Dave Perry's March 18 Explorer article, "Town told not to put reclaimed
water in pond." is the first public notice of our yearlong effort to protect the citizens of Oro
Valley.
Please join us in demanding that the Town of Oro Valley rehabilitate the abandoned pond
site in a way that is lawful, healthful, and financially prudent.
Archaeology Southwest is a small, community -focused and internationally renowned
nonprofit organization dedicated to the collaborative protection of heritage places —
including Oro Valley's ancestral O'odham precursors, Honey Bee Village and the Romero
Site. Since the 1980s, we've investigated these places, publicly shared information about
them, and ultimately helped to preserve them.
In 2023, TOV and The Conservation Fund entrusted Archaeology Southwest with the
Conservation Easement for the 202.05-acre Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve. The
Conservation Easement is a binding agreement between Archaeology Southwest and the
Town of Oro Valley "to protect the Conservation Values of the Property, and to preserve
the continued natural, scenic, open space and/or recreational uses of the Property." The
agreement identifies the Nature Preserve's Conservation Values as "natural, scenic, open
space, historical, biological, cultural, and recreational."
The agreement expressly prohibits "storage, dumping or other disposal of ... any
hazardous or toxic substance, material or waste that is regulated under any federal, state or
local law."
On September 17, 2025—one day after the TOV Council voted (4-2) to reverse its April 17,
2024, decision to transform the pond into a desert garden and instead re-establish the 2.5-
acre pond using reclaimed wastewater —the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA
designated per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as hazardous substances. High
levels of PFAS occur in reclaimed wastewater, including the Tucson wastewater, which
would be used in this project and was previously used to fill the irrigation pond.
Oro Valley should reject the use of PFAS-containing wastewater and should return to its
previously -approved plan for a low-cost desert garden for at least four reasons:
1. Health Risks (and additional scientific findings): EPA has concluded from peer -
reviewed scientific studies that exposure to PFAS may:
ps
281 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 email infoCarchaeologysouthwest.org Stephen E. Nash, Ph.D.
phone 520-882-6946 fax 520-882-6948 www.archaeologysouthwest.org President and CEO
• Decrease fertility or increase high blood pressure in pregnant women;
• Lead to developmental delays and other effects in children;
• Increase risks of prostate, kidney, and testicular cancers;
• Diminish immune system capacities to fight infections.
If reclaimed wastewater is used to fill and maintain the pond in the Preserve, it would
become a closed evaporation pan, where "forever" PFAS chemicals would accumulate
indefinitely. In addition, PFAS accumulate faster and may be more dangerous in and
environments.
2. Financial Disconnect: According to Oro Valley, the Town has $1,500,000 remaining in
the approved budget for the pond. However, the private engineering firm has estimated the
cost to be $3,710,000, much more than double the budgeted amount. There are no
provisions in the budget for testing or remediation of the presumably PFAS-laden
sediments at the current pond site, nor for the periodic draining and cleanup that will be
required to prevent the proposed pond from becoming a hazardous materials waste dump.
3. Property Value Effects: The documented presence of hazardous materials in Oro
Valley's water and soil is unlikely to boost the resale values of local homes, especially
properties downwind from a PFAS-laden pond.
4. Legal Exposure: Archaeology Southwest is obligated by the Conservation Easement to
pursue every legal means to require the Town of Oro Valley to uphold its contractual
agreement. Under the agreement, the conservation values of the Preserve take priority. The
agreement also places financial responsibility for Archaeology Southwest's costs, expenses
and reasonable attorney fees in enforcing the Easement on the Town of Oro Valley.
Archaeology Southwest welcomes continued participation in Nature Preserve planning and
stewardship that better aligns with the purposes and values that brought us into
collaboration with Oro Valley and its wonderful residents and staff in the first place.
Please direct questions or concerns to Dr. Welch, JRWelch@archaeologysouthwest.org
Stephen E. Nash, PhD & RPA John R. Welch, PhD & RPA
President & CEO VP, Preservation & Collaboration
March 22, 2026
Town Council
Oro Valley
Council Members,
see in comments submitted to the Town Council regarding filling
the pond on Vistoso Highlands Drive with reclaimed effluents the
allegation that the use of waste water is prohibited by the
Conservation Easement. Specifically, section 3.11, addresses
Hazardous material and in this case the concern is PFSAs. This
section does not reference a drinking water standard.
There are Federal rules that govern hazards, i.e., hazardous
substances, hazardous materials, and the handling, transporting,
disposal, etc. thereof. These rules are very detailed and
complex. The inference in the comments that the mere presence
of one of these PFAS compounds requires the classification of a
hazardous material without reference to the regulations,
calculations, if necessary, and methodology prohibiting the use 'of
reclaimed wastewater for filling the pond is questionable. The
consultants designing the pond may be able to assist you if
PFAS compounds are truly an issue. Such materials in the pond
may never exceed the concentration leading to a determination
of "Hazardous or Toxic Materials."
Based upon water quality after treatment, ADEQ allows reclaimed
wastewater use for beneficial purposes from watering golf
courses, making snow for ski slopes, recreational impoundments
(ponds), and crop irrigation to list some. The Covenant cites
Hazardous Material and this has not been shown, and therefore
somewhat questionable.
This pond is not for drinking water purposes: It is also my
understanding the pond will not be managed as a static water
body. The consulting firm of Kimley-Horn in the pond design
handles water turnover and aeration.
As for the Tucson Water testing result there are some questions.
• How many samples were analyzed by Tucson Water?
• What are the values and sampling dates for all the samples?
• Were the Tucson Water samples taken before Pima County
made upgrades to its treatment plants, specifically the
completion of the new Agua Nueva facility and upgrades to the
Tres Rios facility?
• Is it valid to use only 1 value to make the conclusion
presented?
I have attached some information on some key EPA Hazardous
Substance Classifications. Then, there are the regulations and
rules for managing these items. As I said, this is complex issue.
I am a retired professional engineer, this is not my current area of
expertise but have worked with Federal hazardous and toxic
substance rules in my career.
In discussions with colleagues, I would suggest the Town move
forward with the plans to restore the former irrigation pond and
defer to the engineering firm you have hired, and Tucson water to
ensure the reclaimed water you will be utilizing meets all safety
standards for its intended use.
Thank you,
Michael Kostrzewski PhD PE
The EPA maintains several lists of hazardous substances
regulated under CERCLA (Superfund), RCRA, and EPCRA, which
include chemicals like asbestos, mercury, benzene, and various
pesticides. These lists, found in 40 CFR 302.4 and 40 CFR
116.4A, identify over 500 chemicals, including hazardous wastes
(P-list/U-Iist) and toxic pollutants.
Key EPA Hazardous Substance Classifications:
• CERCLA Hazardous Substances: Listed in 40 CFR 302.4,
these are designated for reporting spills and releases,
featuring compounds like Aldrin, Allyl alcohol, and Arsenic.
• RCRA Hazardous Wastes: Listed in 40 CFR 261, these
include acutely hazardous P-list chemicals (e.g., Fluorine,
Cyanide) and toxic U-list chemicals.
• Extremely Hazardous Substances (EPCRA): Chemicals that
pose significant immediate health risks, often listed in "List
of Lists" documents.
• Toxic Air Pollutants: Regulated substances including
asbestos, formaldehyde, and various metals.
Commonly Listed Substances:
• Metals/Compounds: Lead, Mercury, Arsenic.
• Solvents: Benzene, Toluene, Carbon disulfide.
• Other: PCBs, PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances).
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 3:32 PM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject:
FW: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
From: Michael Kostrzewsk
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 3:26 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond
11 WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
Michael Kostrzewski
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 3:32 PM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Vistoso Pond Restoration
Pond Restoration.pdf
From: Pamela Jacob:
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 3:16 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Pond Restoration
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Dear Council Members,
Please see the attached letter in support of continuing with the pond restoration project in the Vistoso
Nature Preserve.
Pamela and Doug Jacobs
1
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
1 am writing to express my strong support for the restoration. of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve .pond and to directly ,address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracte01
rizations of the
lawt science, and the Town's authority:.
1. Misuse -of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply, a drinking water standard of
4 parts; per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This.pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure: pathways.
Z Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous -
substances under ,CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features,- dike those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley .and Arizona.
3. ,Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance.,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for :the restoration of the former irrigation pond 1n whole orin part." This project
is not a violation; `:it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in .a town park that
enhances the parks scenic and recreational values.
urge the Council to continue with the. approved plan to restore this vital community
.asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
ga4
Oro Valley Resident--- ---
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 6:35 PM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Support for the Pond Restoration at Vistoso Preserve
From: Edye Bassett
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 6:04 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Support for the Pond Restoration at Vistoso Preserve
IWARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (edvebasseft( outlook.com). Exercise caution when clicking links,
opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
As a resident near Vistoso Preserve I wish to add my voice to support for the proposed restoration of the
pond as presented.
Thank you
Edith Scott Bassett
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 3:54 PM
To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject: FW: Tonight's Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond Contract Discussion
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council.
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: G. Robert Brakenridge
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 3:36 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Tonight's Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond Contract Discussion
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Hello Town Council,
I am a legal resident of Oro Valley, despite this email address.
I urge caution about proceeding with the Vistoso Trails pond contract award. The PFAS issue is not trivial,
and to claim that this (and other) ponds fed by reclaimed, PFAS-contaminated water will be
environmentally/human health/ecologically safe and NOT attract outside regulatory action seems naive.
You are going to have to deal with the PFAS contamination, sooner or later, if water including such
contamination is to be used in the pond. After -the -fact could be very expensive.
The threatened legal action now may be doing the Town a favor. Please wait (a bit more), gather more
information and advice, and ensure that you have the best restoration plan for this beautiful park before
proceeding.
G. Robert Brakenridge
Senior Research Associate/Faculty Research Scientist
INSTAAR, University of Colorado
4001 Discovery Dr., Box 450, Boulder CO 80303
Office and Cell: 603-252-0659; Email: Robert. Bra ken ridge (a)Colorado.edu
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 2:59 PM
To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject: FW: Vistoso Trails pond - a landmark project
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: RobinsonH imal
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 6:45 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Trails pond - a landmark project
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (robinsonhCftomcast.net). Exercise caution when clicking links, opening
attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Mayor Winfield and esteemed Town Council:
Let's get the big dig going!
It's time for the Town to start the process to remake the former golf course and show residents and
potential donors that the Town is committed to restoring the Preserve back into a Sonoran landscape.
Thanks
Robinson Howell
Center Pointe Vistoso resident
P.S. all the noise about PFA's is just that. Not backed by the facts nor how the pond will be built.
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 2:59 PM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject:
FW: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Une: 520-229-4714
From: laurrie iceman
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 4:55 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond
IWARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name (laurrie iceman) is different from their email address (laur5060C)vahoo.com), which may indicate an
impersonation attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before replying or
taking further action.
We urge the Council to award the bid to begin reconstruction of the pond. We live across the street from it and we are
beyond tired of this neglected eye sore. We look forward to work starting on the pond bringing joy back to our community.
We also support the use of reclaimed water. Thank you for moving this project forward.
Denny & Laurrie Iceman
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 3:00 PM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject:
FW: I am in support of the pond restoration
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Lynne Humphries
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 8:08 PM
To: Town Council <Council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: I am in support of the pond restoration
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (lbhumohries(caicloud.com). Exercise caution when clicking links,
opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
I bought a condo in the Vistoso Resprt Casitas in 1998 when the pond on Vistoso Highlands was in its full
glory. And yes, I was aware it was fed by reclaimed water. We now have a home in Stone Canyon. I drive
past the eyesore pond almost every day know. Please proceed to vote to continue the restoration project
on the pond. I am unable to attend the Council meeting tomorrow but I wanted to send my
encouragement.
Lynne Humphries,
Support Breast Cancer Research — I'm a 25 year two-time survivor!!
Please excuse the typos and brevity of my emails sent from my iPhone or iPad
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Sandra Barker
Sirois, Andrea
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 3:03 PM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Pond in Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve
Scan 2.pdf
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 2:28 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond in Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (barkersmbemsn.com). Exercise caution when clicking links, opening
attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Dear Mayor Winfield and Oro Valley Town Council,
Attached you will find a letter in support of restoring the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve pond.
I have to say, I have never seen so much effort by a town bureaucracy to avoid fulfilling a promise you
made to the surrounding neighborhoods and the individual residents that made donations to ensure this
nature preserve happened. If you could just put as much energy and effort towards restoring the pond, it
would already be done!
Please vote to continue with the approved plan for restoring the pond, and stop politicizing this project.
Sincerely,
Sandra Barker
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project is
not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 11:06 AM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject:
FW: Vistoso Resident Here With A Comment Please
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Garry Liddell
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 10:21 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Resident Here With A Comment Please
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Hello Folks,
Garry & Mindy Liddell here. We live full time in Vistoso HOA #1 at 591 W Quiet Springs Dr.
Our street of homes is a direct view out into the preserve and we love our Oro Valley neighborhood. The
one thing that we find very sad though is driving by the eyesore of the pond area that looks like it just
doesn't deserve this rundown eyesore it has become after it once being such a beautiful welcoming sight
when the golf course was operating. We have had multiple guests to our home and it's sad that a
majority of them have made comments like "What's up with that ugly rundown area as we enter your
neighborhood"
Please help us get our once beautiful approach to where we live back to a beautiful welcoming view!
Thank You & With Respect,
Garry & Mindy Liddell
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 11:10 AM
To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject: FW: Opinion on Pond -tonight's meeting..... Please read
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct fine:520-229-4714
From: Beverly Younl
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 8:47 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; Winfield, Joe <jwinfield@orovalleyaz.gov>; Barrett, Melanie
<m ba rrett @orova I I eyaz.gov>
Cc: Robb, Elizabeth <erobb@orovalleyaz.gov>; Greene, Harry <hgreene@orovalleyaz.gov>; Murphy, Mary
<mmurphy@orovalleyaz.gov>; Jones -Ivey, Joyce <Ijones-ivey@orovalleyaz.gov>; Nicolson, Josh
<jnicolson@orovalleyaz.gov>; Beverly Younk
Subject: Opinion on Pond -tonight's meeting..... Please read
l
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
oppose this distraction by ASW and urge the council to follow through on their commitment to this
project.
Rebuke: distractions by ASW and their desire to stop a project that is already approved and is
consistent with the allowed uses of the property as described in the Conservation Easement. We
believe the Council is in support of the project and is ready to move forward. We strongly urge them
to award the bid and let the work begin as soon as possible.
It's time to follow through with the pond promise of water again. We have enough desert plantings
11 it
Beverly Young
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 11:11 AM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Restore the pond at Vistoso Preserve
From: stephandonovan@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 8:44 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Restore the pond at Vistoso Preserve
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
As a voting resident of Oro Valley, I STRONGLY support restoring the pond. It will be money well spent
and a future, on -going asset to Oro Valley.
Again, I vote and I keep track of how you vote.
Stephan Donovan
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 9:33 AM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject:
FW: The pond
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Carol Riordan
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 9:16 AM
To: Town Council <Council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: The pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name (Carol Riordan) is different from their email address (onthebanks3ngmail.com), which may indicate an
impersonation attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before replying or
taking further action.
Please complete the pond . It adds so much to the aesthetic of our community and is good for the wild
life too!
`/f 7/Zoz/o
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Presence pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sin rely, ,,00
Oro Valley Resident
_ 4foyQ _ VVk511'J
Dear Mayor Vllinfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the. Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic -and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Si cerely,
Oro Valley Residents
a f? 3 o, Oa,b
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
4--am- writing 10-expmss-my-stmng.support for lice.resWratiomof.the..`fistoso. T.mb Natum
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and. the Town's authority.
1, Misuse of 'Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard -of
4 pans per trillion to -a -non-potable pond- ler#actUally Ir-mlevantt. 'dais- pond- is;,no# far
human consumption, and Town regulations sMy prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of reclaimed Water. Reclaimed water Is a standard,. highly regulated
resource In Arizona. The EPA,s designation of certain PPAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse In ,.managed water.
features, like those used in .parks and golf courses throughout Oro -Valley and Arizona.
3. lack. of Budgebry Oversights. As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance. .
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the re0omdon of the former irrigation pond "in whole or In Patt" This project
Is not a violation! it Is a restoration of a historic -landscape feature In a town park that
enhances the park's scenlc and recreational values,
l urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based an science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
-ea,t,�
Oro Valley Resident
y171202k
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
cer ly,
Oro Valley Resident
S144 S. VJASLf--a
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Tuesday, April 7, 2026 1:16 PM
To:
Standish, Michael, Stine, Michelle
Subject:
FW: Pond Related Items Newsletter
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Richard Reynold
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 8:38 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond Related Items Newsletter
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (rrevnolds75na amail.com). Exercise caution when clicking links, opening
attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Thank you very much for this newsletter! So much of the information we receive through the press is
either misleading or incorrect. This was much needed.
Dick
Never regret growing older, many are denied the privilege.
Unknown
LDear MWor WftMd and iftfterS of''Ve I'Myn Qx=l .
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails feature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project rules on several` fundamental mischaracterizafions of the
law, since. and the T awn' aid
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 pacts per tri ion to a non-potabte pond is factuaffy irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consurnption, and i own reguWions stficdy prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure paifiways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The ERA°s designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances underA does not prohibit its benet^iciai reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight~ As.the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the avocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
P-2��
Oro Valley Resident
�l ; sio sa 1-ks4iWi Panuau ws AssaQi m C NSwv&r .
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
From: W
Sirois, Andrea
Tuesday, April 7, 2026 1:15 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 11:31 PM
To: Town Council <Council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Please proceed with the current plans to restore the pond as soon as possible .
Southwest Archeology has specious and dubious reasons to seek either an arbitration or injunction in
this matter.
They are well away that the Conservation Easement specifically provides for the pond's restoration.
This is a stalling tactic on their part.
This eye sore needs to be remedied as soon as possible.
It has been four years since Oro Valley took possession of the Preserve mainly through the hard work,
donated money and persistence of the residents.
Get it done.
Signed: W. J. Abbott
A resident of Rancho Vistoso /Oro Valley
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 12:32 PM
To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject: FW: Upcoming council meeting - sending along my thoughts
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Jo Eator
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 12:12 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Upcoming council meeting - sending along my thoughts
b;
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Dear Hard Working OV officials,
First thank you for all you do for our community. Asa resident since 2015 and a homeowner since 2010 1
have been truly impressed by the work this council does. I have been especially excited about OV Path
Forward Team. Great work and a terrific way to involve everyone. The work OV Town has done with the
bike loop is truly wonderful - something I enjoy often.
This email is in support of one project and my tack of support for another.
1. 1 am in support OV Path Forward for the wildlif_g linkage for Arroyo_ Grande. We in Oro Valley have
the unique ability to link the Catalinas to the Tortolitas - we must act for the preservation of our desert
and the wildlife that we all love. It was there range long before there was an Oro Valley.
2. 1 am a resident of Sun City Oro Vatley. I am not in su000rt of the Sun City Lions Head Fountaln
project - even with its scaled down proposal. AZ is in a water crisis. We need to preserve what we have
for life - not for fountains that evaporate water to a ridiculous amount. We will soon be drinking recycled
water. Let's not be like communities near Phoenix where we are in the news that we have run out of
water. The recent Rainlog by the University of Arizona summarizing the winter rains indicated that alt of
Utah, Colorado, AZ have water levels in our dams that are 50% below normal for seasonal snow and
rain. I stand firmly against this proposal.
Thank you for making it to the end. And sincere thanks for your careful deliberation on these important
excitement environmental issues.
Jo Eaton
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 12:20 PM
To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject: FW: Vistoso Nature Preserve Pond - April 8 meeting
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
-----Original Message -----
From: Stan Riggenbacr
r
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 202612:12 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovaIleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Nature Preserve Pond - April 8 meeting
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
I am a citizen of Oro Valley and I live adjacent to the Nature Preserve.
I am writing to encourage you to reject the objections of Archeology Southwest (ASW) regarding the pond and to reject
their request for mediation.
Based on my understanding of the conservation lien and ASW's role in it, I believe they have no standing to take these
actions. I believe it is clear from the terms of the lien that their only role is to ensure that the lien is not violated. They
are exceeding that role in objecting to the pond, since the lien clearly allows the Town to take this action.
The Town alone is empowered to make these decisions. ASW's only role 'is to identify whether they violate the lien,
which they clearly do not. While ASW may feel that they have expertise to weigh in on these decisions, it is in the Town's
discretion to decide whether to request ASW's views or give any consideration to them.
Thank your for consideration of these comments.
Stanley Riggenbach
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Debra Carleton
Sirois, Andrea
Monday, April 6, 2026 3:32 PM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: The Pond at Vistoso Nature Preserve
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 3:27 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: The Pond at Vistoso Nature Preserve
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (dcarleton0l Co)gmail.com). Exercise caution when clicking links, opening
attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Sirs & Madams,
I live on Vistoso Nature Preserve. I fully support the plan to rebuild the Pond.
The pond restoration makes the most sense, both from a cost/investment perspective and the
aesthetics.
A restored pond area will be a beautiful place to gather and a highly valued improvement to the overall
appearance of the Preserve.
In the two surveys the Town conducted in February of 2024 the pond was in the top two requests of the
survey respondents.
I oppose the distraction by ASW and urge the council to follow through on their commitment to this
project. Please move forward with the work quickly.
Timothy Carleton
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Monday, April 6, 2026 3:02 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: vistoso trails nature preserve pond project
From: Amy D'Ambrosio
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 2:44 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: vistoso trails nature preserve pond project
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Please consider funding the vistoso trails pond project. It adds so much beauty and is a fantastic
place for families to gather, take pictures and enjoy the beauty that is Oro Valley.
Sincerely
Amy and Anthony D'Ambrosio
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: S Thompson
Sirois, Andrea
Monday, April 6, 2026 2:30 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond Project
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 2:29 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond Project
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
[This is the first time you received an email from this sender (sthomosonogOrlmail.com). Exercise caution when clicking links,
ening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
My name is Scott Thompson; my wife and I live on Mulligan Dr., adjacent to the Vistoso
Trails Nature Preserve. We contributed money in support of the formation and on -going
stewardship of the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve.
We feel strongly that Town should not abdicate its position as an advocate for proper
preservation and stewardship of the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve by allowing water
containing PFAS to be stored in the Preserve pond, which currently under consideration.
I have spent the last 30+years as an environmental professional, and most of the last
decade specializing in PFAS issues in soil, groundwater, and surface water. This type of
issue is one I am intimately familiar with and therefore have a strong, science -based
opinion on.
We all agree that the Town needs to fulfill their agreed -upon obligation to maintain the
Nature Preserve. My concern is that the Town supports accepting a hazardous material in
the pond, which not only could pose a threat to wildlife, but also could expose the town
and its citizens to future liability.
PFAS are a set of insidious chemical compounds —some cancer -causing —that can pose a
significant threat to human health and the environment. They do not degrade fully in any
meaningfully short timeframe. That means once introduced to the pond, unless treated
they will stay forever. All wildlife drawn to the pond will be exposed to PFAS. Thus, it's
important to have the Town provide expected PFAS levels in the water they provide and to
perform ongoing analysis of both the source water and the pond water.
We should all should be asking questions, not just accepting that this is a good plan.
Potential questions include, but are not limited to:
• Has the town performed a risk -based health assessment to ensure that human
health and the environment (including wildlife) are protected by their reclaimed
water plan?
• What are the expected PFAS concentrations expected to be initially? How will they
change overtime?
• What levels of PFAS are acceptable to have in the pond at any one time?
• What levels of PFAS are acceptable use as irrigation water?
• Do these levels meet applicable regulatory standards?
There is always the possibility that the answers to these questions will indicate that
accepting the water as -is is perfectly acceptable. But to not ask the questions amounts to
an abdication of the Town's stewardship role of the Preserve.
PFAS do not generally degrade or somehow vanish. They accumulate, they migrate, and
they pose a health risk to all animals and humans exposed to them.
With the updated liner the potential subsurface migration issue should be controlled. But
with each addition of contaminated water, any sediment will continue to accumulate PFAS
and due to evaporation, the PFAS concentrations in water will continue to rise.
Further, what happened 20 years ago with other Town ponds is not applicable now since
PFAS were barely on the radar and not yet regulated. Now we know of their presence and
can mitigate their potential threat. The important thing to remember is that certain PFAS
are considered as both carcinogens and hazardous materials by USEPA. As such, the
concentrations of these PFAS must be below certain thresholds to be acceptable for use,
including Land application. A good environmental Lawyer would be able to give an opinion
on the potential Legal Liability associated with storing water containing a hazardous
substance, as well as using that water for irrigation.
In conclusion, we strongly urge the Town to continue working to meet its obligations in a
way that does not threaten human health and the environment.
Thank you for your time.
Scott --- D. Thompson PG
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 2:14 PM
To: Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
Subject: FW: Preserve pond
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
From: Ron Lochei
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 1:47 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Preserve pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Mayor and council,
We are residents of VH#1 and live two blocks west of the pond. The pond is the gateway to
our neighborhood as well as Stone Canyon, the jewel in the crown so to speak, and has long
been used as a backdrop for photos and weddings by residents and visitors alike.
More impactful, however, is the wildlife which was drawn to the pond because the water
sustained them, especially through dry years. We have seen the following animals at the
pond over the years: rabbits, bobcats, coyotes, javelinas, deer, the occasional mountain lion
(and kitten), bats, snakes, a large variety of ducks, and a multitude of different bird species
including nesting hawks.
To our knowledge there is no other place in Oro Valley quite like it when water is in the pond.
Can the residents exist without the pond? Of course, for we have been doing so for the past
half dozen years or so. But for the animals that congregated there, as well as those of us who
enjoyed their presence, there is simply no substitute for the pond which, as you are aware, is
now part of the larger nature preserve.
Thank you for taking our thoughts into consideration in making your decision.
i
Ron Locher
Linda Scalise
Lot #89
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 1:48 PM
To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject: FW: Preserve Pond Restoration
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Bill Gallahe
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 12:29 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Preserve Pond Restoration
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Please, please don't let negative erroneous information about the needed restoration stop what has
been approved & is so needed for the ecological & aesthetics of our community. Respectfully, Bill &
MaryJo Gallaher ( Oro Valley residents)
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 1:42 PM
To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject: FW: Pond restoration project in Vistoso Preserve
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Dianne Slotten
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 1:12 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond restoration project in Vistoso Preserve
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Hello,
I oppose this distraction by ASW and urge the council to follow through on their
commitment to the pond restoration project in Vistoso Preserve.
Thank you,
Dianne Slotten
Ome Mayes Winfield and Mambers of 4,e Town Council
I am wTieng Ip ex(xe a3 my Mnxg sappnt kr the msaxaxn of the VtVa:o Tm1s Nature
Preserve Pord and to directly address recent daims made by Afchaoobgy Smorwest
The opiaMlion to Mi s project robs do several fandamentat mischamolorIzaWns G ine
law, seance, and the Ta n's aulhanly
1. Wlsuse of Regulatory Standards The anmmpt to apply a drinking water standard or
4 parts per tnlliorl to a nonpotatve pond is factually welerfnL This pond is W for
human ccnwimpl on, and Town ro"tons sMoly prohiM swimming of wadhg, which
remaves phrnay exposure patf,ways
2. Lawful Use of RectAk"d Water'. Reclaimed water M a Ma'dard, hghiy regulated
resource in Animm, The EPA's desynauon of certain PFAS compnurgs es hazanlaJs
aubsuuN:ns under CE12ClA does rid polidit les Uerwfldd reusn in managed water
features, like those used in panes and goN courses throughout Oro Valley and Anzona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oven light As no ensament holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or a dta°us muneopal budget pan ica. Dery wns regarding
the allocation or funds for Torn PrO exits are matlers of pit hC pricy and govonan:e,
not easement compiler".
4. Explicit Authorizallon: Paragraph 2.6 of t-w Conservator, Casement orpliary
allows for the restoration of the former ergation pond -M wiuMa or in part' This project
is not a vlolaton; it Is a restoraton of a hMOM landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the parks scent and recreational r<Aues.
I urge the C tund to coshes, with C,e approved plan to restore KS vdal comm fi ty
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
n— V.Km, Resident
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaractenzations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
^WV
Oro Valley Resident
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of, a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely_, _
Oro Valley Resident
VLCDJti LSD *Cv[tLA
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
n su port for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nat o
I am writing to express my strong sup g Southwest.
to direct) address recent claims made by Archaeology
Preserve pond and Y
l fundamental mischaracterizations of the
The opposition to this project relies on severa
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Stand
ards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for which
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable o
ion and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, w
human consumption,
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Rec
laimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizon
a. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substan
ces under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
featureslike those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
,
3. Lac Budgetary k of Bud eta Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
g tY
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement, compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part. This, project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science, andi established standards rather than, rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
OL
�Qro Valley Resident
a I l:.(1 ',I fig
• r, r i r .{: I r " I •1 1 r/ F 'Y I tl
-
i
1. ;' I i r, f,•gLl ` i i r t'S,' i :',,�r, 1' , ,., '+ , r ,
f Town
Council,
eld''and Members o,fr the
°Dear Mayor Vllinfi ;
,restoration;' of the, Vistoso Trails ' Naturer
;, .m stron� support, foritthe,: - •
i am wr�ting'to express Y'.. ims: made b Archaeology, Southwest..
resew ontl :and -to directly!: address. recent cla Y
P e'P
r mental..mischaracterizations of'the
opposition to this project relies on several funds
The ,
t 'law science; and_ the. Towns„authority::
t to a I a:drinking, water standard of
1,{ Misuse, of `Regulatory, Standards::The3 attemp pp y
its ' er trillion to. a non -potable, pond: is.:factually ,irrelevant This p..ond is, not for
PA p
hurnan consumption'; and..
,regulations'strictly p�ohibit:swii�nrri[ng or, wading which
removes primary,6 bosure�,pathways:
Lawful Usa. of. Reclaimed 1Nate ,Reclaimed water is a� standard, highly regulated
. < < ' • , �'._ - . ..+ -- - _ � + :, .. .! � hazardous
resource ;in Arizona The EPA s' -A-Si!
nationof/certain .PEAS' compounds as
substances under C:ERC-LA, does. not:,p�rohib�trr its benef cial•reuse in managed water
features, like tho_ se: used in+ parks and golf courses: throughout,.Oro Valieyr.and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary O�ersigh't %As th6basement,;b " tl _r' ��Archaeoiogy Southwest has
po. l-_ ai .authority t ' demand, or,:.didWte, municipal; budget+,priorities. Decisions regarding
ie9,
: the .alioc tion'tof funds fog TownFprojects,Ar , '-ers,�of public„pol cy,and :governance,
"not�easerrment*.com-liance -= r{ . r
4. Eplici# Author#a#ion::' ` g faph'2�:6' of'the Conservation ,Easement explicitly
Para r
t 4,
alloiia► :for: the restorationof.he,.forrrier irrigation�.pond `din whole or irk part." This project
is not a' olaWn; it:is;a restolation of a�`hi. ei. landscape feature �in a town pa
is
enlanes.'the pa,'s;:scenic +and recreational -values:
ur.e the D;ouncil to c�ointin"ue with thet approved, plan+,tot restore this vital cornhiunrty
Ass,,et':based on science: and ,'established'sta;ndards athergthan c etoric and
. ' exaggerated; cisams k
S�ncare�y' -
a3
,� ,
Oror��.Valley. Resident+
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Monday, April 6, 2026 11:47 AM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Vistoso Pond Support
OV Pond issue.pdf
From: Ken Cundif
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2026 12:22 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Pond Support
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name (Ken Cundiff) is different from their email address (kctucsonaomail.com), which may indicate an
impersonation attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before replying or
taking further action.
Mayor Winfield
Please see that attached document requesting the restoration of the pond as soon as possible. As it is
vital to the community.
Regards
Ken and Beth Cundiff
Dear
Mayor
N 6_1 I
Council,,
and Members .bfe Town. C VVn e �,
1;n
writingto express
: my_s_t
.g"suppo010the t6st&atio.na of the Vist -o.!TrTrails, re
"
reserve P0 and to d aly address recent claims ftiade:
by-Arbh6 e7obgySouthwest-
T,he::opposition to thin fundamental", r.Pj P171, several
slaw, sciIbnWo;,and. teTown's authority:
1. ij, R. idi standard -
Ususe e,,, 6 eg 9 F�Y�', talr.; rds:. The.` -a em o--.,app y1adrinkingwa er� -
S11' - P_ ' VA
4,'port ,per trillion t6,d non -!potable pond,]; 5Ily �1
irrelovant,"This'., pond it. - 'not "for
human consumption.,
Land 'To
wn: -Aregulations stri
c11y-pr Ibits
swimming .Q rwa d'ng,,`,w ch
I
re.m.PWIP41, primary exposure: YS,
'. - , , standard,,
A, - - I -highly*'_090.141"PIC.
2-N-LA I;U"s-"e",'o-f--'Re�c'laim"ed.',Wafer'R.oclairned -an�d'ard.""'-"I"t wa- er, as
1 r d
resource in' Ad2ohbw�The ,
desIgnationdfpQown PF. compounds; as
JaMfghg- managed d -fbt
ubstan.0 e lEkit LA... (11' 6, t, hO prohibititsbeniefth-1' reuse'
..Os,"un. e
ia
ge water
4,,.Used:--in p&kt:,c!h'd'�:, -b"If es throughout .
fe0twesi, -1ke., thos wq rs `Valley and Arizona.
9 4: g
1- Lack ,,df;SUdgetq.r litAgthe :easement: - rit
y -0v �$119 h6ldedr-.AfCt�abol .Archaeology- ha
Fer a bo
_P9
no. lei`al authority to. dema
nd or municipal
. ....... budget priorities Decisions
the allocation-T n projects are matters .-of p6blic t6
Of,, s, for ow P.011py and: governance:, -ah,
not 6 a s b me t �'c
QMp 14no
explicitly
-txpl"icit,Auifiotiggit'l",O-li, " Paragraph,'2',.6 .of t C, ation,* Ea exp i
ft on.s.-ery. semen. I
ro
611ows.:'-forthe-'re 'd-71n, W .0 part:'' This p
b6h r r gq, _jqjT pon h I& or,
in
is not avi - blatio.m"'fl
P restoration bfa histotidl 6 hidscafeature in alown', pokJ48
_p6 r
he,p
enhances the .piscenic.. ,rk
urgo.ihea .Council `t6:continue With the -.approved tore t hi j
Plan to restore s� Vitefl,co community
:asset based .on: science 'and established: stan00rOs otherthan rhetoric.
and'
-exagg,prpt d claims.
SinceY,,
Orov 'Ile" R
Valley psid"pht-
2-
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Monday, April 6, 2026 11:33 AM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject:
FW: Vistoso Trails
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
From: Gerald Bren
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 11:24 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Trails
IWARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
To the Mayor and all council members,
The characterization of the Vistoso Trails pond filled with recycled water as a hazardous waste disposal
site is a gross mischaracterization, intended to mislead and for political purposes. Any reasonable
study, taking into account the actual conditions of the recycled water would quickly show that the pond
water would meet quality standards.
Ask Archaeology Southwest's John Welch to quantify the amount of PFAS contamination that might
accumulate in the pond. Don't let him getaway with inflammatory statements that are not backed up
with real facts. Ask him which portion of the Tucson metro area would provide water to the treatment
plants that supply the recycled water to Oro Valley. Ask him what the PFAS content might actually be in
the recycled water supplied to Oro Valley. Ask him how many grams of PFAS might show up in ten years
and ask him to compare that amount to the amount of PFAS that might have been contained in TEN
GALLONS of fire fighting foam used at Davis Monthan airport that created the plume of PFAS
contamination troubling the Tucson water supply.
It's time to deal in facts rather than inflammatory, nonsensical rhetoric. Contamination of the recycled
water is not a valid concern.
Gerald Bren
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Monday, April 6, 2026 11:38 AM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject:
FW: Preserve Vistoso Pond
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Michael Sevie
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 11:37 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Preserve Vistoso Pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
At some point, the Council needs to steel your resolve. The pond is becoming a Taj Mahal legacy
foisted on us by a group that disproportionately benefits from it. They expect all of OV to fund this
largesse. It should not.
The pond makes zero sense. The insatiable thirst for more money by Preserve Vistoso doesn't either.
Mike Sevier
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Monday, April 6, 2026 11:41 AM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Spaeth, Michael
Subject:
FW: POND AT THE VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Dan Faus
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 11:39 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: POND AT THE VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
We strongly support the return of a pond feature at the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve and urge you
to award the bid on April 8 so work can begin as soon as possible.
The city has owned the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve for approximately four years and the
restoration work has been delayed too long!
Daniel and Patricia Faust
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 11:45 AM
To: Stine, Michelle; Spaeth, Michael
Subject: FW: Pond agenda item on Town Council meeting of 8 April 2026
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
From: Pat Tebc
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 8:38 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond agenda item on Town Council meeting of 8 April 2026
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Even as I filled in the date in the above subject line, I was reminded that we were told last year that action
on the approved pond project would commence in January of this year. That was three months and one
week ago. Meanwhile the project has been beset by delays marked by misleading information and fear -
mongering. All of what is being thrown against this project has been thoroughly discussed before and
resolved, thanks to dedication by concerned residents and our Town Council members. Both of those
groups have been heavily involved in volunteer efforts to improve the Preserve while some have put their
efforts into delaying and preventing the project from proceeding as approved. These delaying tactics
remind me so much of those in the political realm that it's sickening. Look around us at golf courses in
Oro Valley - The Views, Conquistador and Canada, OVCC, Pusch Ridge and others in the area, Crooked
Tree, Quarry Pines, Omni and others. All have water features which not only present golfing challenges
but also enhance the feel of our beautiful desert landscape. And, finally, consider that had not our Oro
Valley residents banded together to prevent many more homes from being built on the Vistoso property,
how much water would those homes have required and how much they would have detracted from
rather than enhancing the beauty and enjoyment of our beloved city.
We have discussed and reviewed this project in great detail, had studies performed, bids requested, and
considered and approved a very good project. Let's reward those efforts by moving forward.
PatTebo
Oro Valley resident.
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my. strong.supportfor_the restoration of the Vistoso Trails -Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology: Southwest:
The opposition to_this project relies'on several fundamental mischaracterizations'of the
=law, science,- and d the Town's;authority:
_ Tl' .Mituso: of Regulatory' Sta'ndards: Th6 attempt to apply a drinking_:water.standard; of
4 parts per tnllion.to'a non -potable pond isfactually", irrelevant.This pond is not for
human..consumption, and .Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or -wading, which
removes primary exposure.pathways. _
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water' is, a standard, highly regulated
resource -in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as 'hazardous
substances under-CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water = =
features, like those used in parks'and golf courses_ throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight:-As`the basementbo'lder; Archaeology. Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for:Town projects are matters of public, policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
: 4. Explicit Authorization: P6ragraph:2.6-of the'. Conservation" Easement explicitly; _
allows for the restoration. of_the former irrigation pond "in -whole or.in part." This: project
is not a violation; it is a. restoration of.a historic landscape feature in a town park that
..enhances the park'sj scenic' and recreational values.
urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather, than -rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincer ly, .
t;
Oro Valle esiden
gAt9��{�.p
I
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Monday, April 6, 2026 9:36 AM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject:
FW: Pond Restoration
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
From: Jo Ann Schlott
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 9:10 AM
To: Town Council <Council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond Restoration
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
I can't attend the council meeting, but I would like to say I support restoring the pond as
planned.
Long-time Oro Valley resident. Moved here in 1992. 34 years ago.
Thanks!
Jo Ann Schlott
1
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 9:35 AM
To: Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
Subject: FW: My vote is No on Pond in Vistoso Preserve
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Vallev
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: rose pierrc
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 9:19 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: My vote is No on Pond in Vistoso Preserve
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
I vote we restore the old pond area in the Vistoso Preserve back to a riparian area with no pond, but
with the ability to hold water during heavy rains. The area just north of the late pond has some unique
riparian plants like the Goodings Willow, and rock and water holding capacity that holds water during
monsoons and cleans and returns rainwater to our water table. Perhaps Watershed Management could
advise on a method to do extend this riparian area further south.
I am opposed to any pond being installed due to PFAS (scientifically proven) and drought issues. It
would be selfish to build a pond right now with any water, reclaimed or otherwise. I am also opposed to
sending this to mediation to further delay restoration of this area. Let's get the job done. Send it to the
people to vote or do a final vote of the council to restore it to a riparian area. The natural regeneration of
this golf course has been amazing. We are fortunate to have such a beautiful piece of the Sonoran in our
city. Let's not delay this further.
Rose Pierro
Oro Valley
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 10:47 AM
To: Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
Subject: FW: Pond at Vistoso Trails
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
From:
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 10:16 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond at Vistoso Trails
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Please proceed with the water restoration project. The objections to it are ludicrous and unfounded.
Susan Keeney
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 10:47 AM
To: Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
Subject: FW: Pond
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line:520-229-4714
From: Lewis Rosco(
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 10:14 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name (Lewis Roscoe) is different from their email address (Iruscoe3aomail.com), which may indicate an
impersonation attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before replying or
taking further action.
Please proceed with the pond construction.
Lewis Roscoe
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sizois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Monday, April 6, 2026 10:48 AM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Vistoso pond
From: Mary LonL
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 9:00 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (mikemarylonc312Cct yahoo.com). Exercise caution when clicking links,
opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Good morning. As a frequent user of the golf cart paths - I am urging you to consider a renovation of the
pond/ as it is - it is a nasty eyesore- it seems the plans that have been hashed out over the last four years
have what's best- a simple but friendly restoration.... Which will benefit the wildlife as well as aestheticly
please the many many people who use this area.
Thank you. Mary Long
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Monday, April 6, 2026 10:50 AM
To:
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
Subject:
FW: pond
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Vallee
Direct Line:520-229-4714
From: jan
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 8:55 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name Qan) is different from their email address (yeats98ayahoo.com), which may indicate an impersonation
attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before replying or taking further
action.
pls
continue with the plan to restore the pond. pls do not follow asc's recommendations.
ty
jan ajemian
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation, it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
/Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Friday, April 3, 2026 12:24 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Presentation of Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis
Microsoft Word - Presentation of Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis.docx.pdf
From: Anthony DAngelo
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2026 6:49 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Presentation of Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Mayor Winfield and members of the Town Council.
I read with interest the presentation you will receive at the next Town Council meeting in part because of
the importance Oro Valley's parks facilities have in fulfilling the Town's desire to pursue a robust Leisure
Tourism strategy.
Stated within the Town's Culture and Recreation Strategy Statement is the following: "Oro Valley will
enhance recreational facilities, promote artistic expression, and support the natural environment,
ensuring long-term resilience and a strong sense of community identity."
To achieve this requires a well-defined strategy, high standards, smart capital investment and consistent
care in the operations of all of these recreational assets. Attached is a summary document highlighting
excerpts from the presentation, the Strategic Plan, the 2020 statistically valid survey of residents, the CIP
and questions I respectfully request you consider during the presentation. I have reformatted the
financial aspect of the presentation to illustrate side by side comparisons of revenues and expenditures.
Thank you for your dedication to make Oro Valley a wonderful place to live and visit.
Respectfully,
Tony D'Angelo
Presentation of Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Per the Town's FY2026 - FY2027 Strategic Plan, this report is intended to provide a comprehensive
financial analysis of the Town's recreational amenities, including the Aquatic Center, Community and
Recreation Center and individual parks. Revenue and expenditure data included in this report are for FY
(Fiscal Year) 24/25.
CULTURE. AND RECREATION STRATEGY STATEMENT
The Town of Oro Valley is dedicated to fostering a vibrant community that values recreation, prioritizes
community engagement, and focuses on user -centered improvement while still respecting the desert
ecosystem.
By prioritizing user -centered improvements, community engagement, and environmentally conscious
practices, the Town aims to foster a vibrant and welcoming environment for residents and visitors alike
that meets the community's recreational needs.
By prioritizing accessibility, cultural diversity, and innovative partnerships, Oro Valley will enhance
recreational facilities, promote artistic expression, and support the natural environment, ensuring long-
term resilience and a strong sense of community identity.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Focus on Resident -Centered Recreation and Cultural Enrichment
• Ensure recreational and cultural programs reflect the needs and expectations of Oro Valley residents by
prioritizing community input, accessibility, and diverse opportunities.
Foster Community Engagement and Inclusivity
• Actively engage residents, businesses, and organizations in cultural and recreational initiatives that reflect
Oro Valley's identity and community.
Seek to Enhance Accessibility and User Experience
• Improve accessibility, safety, and comfort in parks, trails, and recreational facilities to ensure equitable
access for all ages and abilities.
Ensure Responsible Growth
Promote diverse arts, cultural, and recreational programs that serve Oro Valley residents in a cost-effective
manner while attracting visitors.
STRATEGIC PLAN PROJECT
Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis
• Conduct a comprehensive financial analysis of recreational amenities, including golf courses, the aquatic
center, the community recreation center, and individual parks.
DISCUSSION
The mission of the Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Department is to inspire connection through
recreation - connecting people to people, people to community, and people to nature. The purpose of
the Parks and Recreation Department is to enhance the quality of life for all Oro Valley residents by
providing exceptional parks, trails, recreation programs, facilities and events.
Please note that neither the Town's budget, nor its financial reporting delineates budget or expenditure
amounts by individual park or amenity. The Parks Maintenance Division, for example, encompasses
costs for all Town parks; therefore, professional estimates and assumptions for cost allocation were
employed where necessary, based on park acreage, field acreage, square footage or other measures as
appropriate.
Town of Oro Valley Statistically Valid Survey Result — May 2020
Q2a_ Now would you rate the overall quality of the Town of Oro
Valley recreation programs/services in which your household has
Participated?
Program Participation and Ratings
Participation. fortyfiW Mrcent (45%1 of resppnJng households have participated in Iv reation
Proerarns Wse Kes offered by the Town of Oro Varier during the past twelve mprdhs These
respond.ms (45%) wan ask" to rara the orerag quality of the fown's rgeetion
Programs/services.
• 2%rated the overall qualM of recreation programs/seryices n eseNknt
• g% rated Me overall oualM of wreNroa pmgrarW asset", as good
• 54%rated the overall quel ty of recreation Pogra n.1%ervkes as fee
• !]%rated the overall quality of nionation programs/services as poor
91 % of respondents indicated the current quality state of the town's existing
parks and recreation facilities to be in Fair to Poor Condition. The national
average rating is 12% Fair to Poor
QUESTIONS TO ASK STAFF REGARDING THIS PRESENTATION
1. Are there standards of operations and maintenance for all of the parks and recreational facilities
provided by the Town of Oro Valley consistent with your statement: The purpose of the Parks and
Recreation Department is to enhance the quality of life for all Oro Valley residents by providing
exceptional parks, trails, recreation programs, facilities and events? Are current expenditures
sufficient to meet the "exceptional' standard implied by the strategic plan statement?
2. Since the publishing of the statistically valid survey in 2020, have the perceptions of overall quality of
recreational programs/services improved?
3. Why does the Town not budget or financially report expenditures by individual park or amenity?
4. The capital investments in parks and recreation last fiscal year reflected in this presentation are only
34% of what was projected in the GIP. A significant amount of that is for VTNP but there are other
areas which apparently were not completed? Why were these not completed?
2024-2025 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Parks and Recreation
FY 24/25
Parks & Recreation
$8,424,9
ADA/Safely Walkway Concrete improvements System Wide
P&R
$150,000
Community Center Elevator and Entryway Improvement
CRC
$1,976,907
Community Center Flat Roof Surface Replacement
CRC
$223,000
CRC Restaurant Cooler/Freezer Modernization and Floor Repair
CRC
$65,000
Equipment Replacement (Golf Maintenance)- Reelmaster Mower
CCG
$105,000
Golf Conquistador Lake Dredging
CCG
1 $80,000
Golf John Deere Tractor Replacement
CCG
$125,000
MUP - Phase 11- Naranjo Dr.
P&R
$165,000
Parks Maintenance Toro Reelmaster Mower Replacement
P&R
$85,000
Pusch Ridge Golf Bridge Replacement
CCG
$400,000
Pusch Ridge Tennis Bleachers and ADA Accessibility
CCG
$200,000
Steam Pump Ranch Solar Lighting
P&R
$71,000
Steam Pump Ranch Farmer's Market Structure Upgrade
P&R
$579,00
Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Site Improvements
P&R
$200,00
VTNP Revegetation and Beautification
P&R
$4,000,0
0
Community Center CIP without Golf
CC
$2,464,907
Golf Only CIP
CCG
$710,000
Parks & Recreation other than Total Community Center CIP
P&R
$5,250,000
Total Community Center CIP
$3,174 907
S. Why was the capital expended for the Community Center elevator and entryway listed within Golf vs.
the CRC?
6. Given the fact that a grant is considered revenue to VTNP, why was the HOA contributions originally
intended to subsidize golf not included as revenue to Golf?
7. The Town hosts a number of major tennis tournaments each year. Where are revenues associated
with these tournaments posted within this report?
8. Does the Town track the sales tax generated on parks and & recreation revenues by facility?
PARKS AND RECREATION
.v"
we
p,g
sxam -I,VINP
IMNrk
Na,aryaNM1
Rwarnaot
Park
TOTA1
REVENUES
xoFm
REV
REVENUES
Am,hi Schorr uistrmtfatlllty usage
$30,292
$30,292
5.9%
Contracted Programs
$37,024
$37,024
7.2%
Swim Team
$1M,782
$138,782
26.9%
Special Events
$1,269
$1,264
0.2%
OVAC Daily Uropins
$M,084
$94,084
18.2%
OVAC Outside Competitions
$851
S851
0.2%
Swim Meets
$53,208
$53,208
10.3%
Aquatic Center Rental income
$12,1M
$12,138
2.4%
OVAC Memberships/Passes
$142,846
$142,846
27.7%
OVAC In -House Pr rams
$5,355
$5,355
1.O%
TOTAL OVAL REVENUE
$51%844
$515,844
5.7%
Concession Sales
$137
11
1
$137
O.D%
Daily OroPln
$71,709
$71,709
4.5%
Member Dues
$996,505
$996,505
63.1%
In House Recreation Programs
$301,520
$301,520
19.1%
Contracted Recreation Programs
$117,258
$117,258
7.4%
Facility Rental lmc me
$93,065
$93,065
5.9%
TOTALCRCREVENUE
$1,580,190
$1,580,194
17.3%
Membership Fees
$1,729,349
$1,729,349
26.3%
Green Fees
$2,521,557
$;Si1,557
38.3%
Sales - Toumament
$371,848
$371A"
5.7%
Sales - Nember Rounds
$5,201
$5,201
0.1%
G.If less..
$22,M3
$22,343
0.3%
Range, Rental & Other Golf Related
$149,443
$149A43
2.3%
Can fees
SM2,352
$M2,3S2
5.8%
Merchandise Sales
$333,599
$333,599
5.1%
Food and eevera a
$M,243
5900,243
13.7%
NOA Carm/bpNo.
$159050
$159,050
2.4%
Other Revenue
$2,463
$2,463
0.0%
TOTAL GOLF REVENUE
$6,577,448
$6,577,448
72.0%
SPR In -House Rec Programs
$77,637
$77,637
67.2%
SPR Ramada Rentals
$90
$%
0.1%
SPR Special Everts
1
1
$625
1
$625
0.5%
SPR Contracted Programs
$17,372
$17,372
15.W
SPR Rentals
$19,79$
$19,795
17.1%
TOTAL STEAMPUMP RANCH REVENUE
$115,519
$115,519
1.3%
State Grants
$22,499
$22,499
300%
TOTAL VTNP REVENUE
$22,499
$22,499
0.2%
field Rentals
$80,922
$80,922
93.2%
Ramada Rentals
$4,960
$4,960
5.9
Contracted Pr rams
$985
$985
1.1%
TOTALJDK REVENUE
$86,867
$86,867
1.0%
Cwmatted Programs
$5,210
$5,210
3.09k
Ramada Rentals
$13,350
$13,350
7.8%
Field Rentals
$132,495
$132,495
77.5%
Archery Memberships
519,897
$19,897
11.6%
TOTAL NARANIA REVENUE
$170,952
$170,952
1.9%
Ramada Rentals
$9,285
$9,285
11.2%
Field Rentals
$47,421
$47,421
57.2%
Contracted Pmgra ms
$26,270
$26,270
31.1
TOTALRIVERFRONTREVENUE
$82,976
$82,976
1
TOTAL PARKS
AND RECREATION REVENUES
$9129800
EXPENDITURES
ovm
qc
T,y,
steam W,np
ilanch
MP
Israelis
Naraq.P.s
RHe.6mt
Pas
TOTAL
EXPENDOURES
%OF TT.
EXP
Personnel
$1.012,561
$1,042,S61
63.9%
Operations & Maintenance
589,146
$589,146
36.1%
TOTAL OVAC EXPENDITURES
$1,631,707
$1,631,707
13.4%
Personnel
$1,302,728
$1,302,728
56.1%
Operations & Maintenance
$1,021,221
$1,071,221
43.9%
TOTAL CRC EXPENDITURES
$2,323,949
$2,323,949
19.0%
Personnel
$2,389,117
$2,389,117
42.0%
Operations & Maintenance
$3,297,908
$3,297,908
58.0%
TOTAL GOLF EXPENDITURES
1
1$5,687,025
1
$5,687,025
46.6%
Penpnnel
$563,245
$563,245
834%
Operations & Maintenance
$112,077
$112,077
16.6%
TOTAL STEAMPUMP EXPENDITURES
$675,322
$675,322
5.5%
Personnel
$108,277
$109,277
58.5%
Operations & Maintenance
$76,782
$76)82
41.5%
TOTAL VTNP EXPENDITURES
$185,059
$185,059
1.5%
Personnel
$197,748
$197,748
32.7%
Operations & Maintenance
$406,844
$406,1i
67.3%
TOTAL JDK EXPENDITURES
$604,592
$604,592
5.0%
Personnel
1
$247,885
$247,885
36.8%
Operations & Maintenance
$425,833
1
$425,833
63.2%
TOTAL NARANIA EXPENDITURES
$673, 7IS
$673,718
5.5%
Personnel
1
1 $162,949
$162,949
38.2%
Operations & Maintenance
1
1 $263,957
$263,957
61.8%
TOTAL RIVERFRONT EXPENDITURES
1
IS426.906
$426,906
3.5%
Total Personnel
$6,014,510
49.3%
Total Operations & Maintenance
$6,193,768
50.7%
TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION EXPENDITURES
$12,208,278
NET OPERATIONS
PARKS AND RECREATION
NET % TTL
OPERATIONS REV
OVAL
-$1,115,863 416.3%
CRC
GOLF
STEAMPUMP
4743,755
-$559,803
VTNP
JDK
-$162,560
-$517,725
NJA NMA
-$502,766 .294.1%
RIVERFRONT
-$343,930 414.5%
TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION
-$3,078,478 -33.7%
P&R CAPITAL
BUDGET
ACTUAL
OVAC
$0
$0
CRC
$2,464,907
$1,360,265
GOLF
$710,000
$822,862
TOTAL CRC with GOLF
$3,174,907
$2,183,227
STEAMPUMP
$650,000
$378,216
VTNP
$4,200,000
$328,454
JDK
$0
NARANIA
$0
RIVERFRONT
$0
OTHER PARKS & RECREATION
$400,000
Total Pi CapitalFY 2025
$8,424,907
1 $2,889,797
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water. Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The" EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA. does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water .
features,: like those used iq parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not.easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the, Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Oro Valley Restdent: -- __-- ----_ --=------__._
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Bec;
Sirois, Andrea
Friday, April 3, 2026 1:42 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: [Scan] URGENT:Rancho Vito pond
URGENT -Rancho Vito pond.pdf
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2026 1:41 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: [Scan] URGENT:Rancho Vito pond
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name (Becky) is different from their email address (oracefulsss(ghotmail.com), which may indicate an
impersonation attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before replying or
taking further action.
This area has become such an eye sore for a once beautiful place. Becky Humpal
Sent with Genius Scan for iOS.
https://tgtapp.com/e/scan
Sent from my iPhone
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary, Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
r
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory 'Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful. Use .of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPXs designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely, - -
Oro Valley Resident
Dear Mayor Winfield. and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
I. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and. established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
J OAww iNRoU,_ .
Oro Valley Resident
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracteriizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PEAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal. authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to. continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
Va'jt�
AAVb�toS& t3,& ar,n
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
—jig 4• l- 26
��`' , v\ `1+UVie Cck',JiaN
Oro Valley Resident
Dear Mayor Winfield and 'Merrribers-.of the Town Council;
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of :the. Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to .directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.'
..The opposition to this project relies _on several fundamental .mischaracterizations lof the
;law; ' science, , and the Town's _authority
1. Misuse of Regulatory' Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4. parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond. is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations -strictly;prohibit swimming or. wading,'which
removes primary exposure -pathways.
2. 'Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water, is .a standard, :highly ,regulated
�- resource in Arizona.. The EPA designation of certain PEAS -compounds !as hazardous
+ substances under CERCLA does not prohibit .its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used- in parks and golf courses throughout'Oro Valley :and Arizona:.
3.:Lack. of Budgetary 'Oversight: As, the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities.:Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are -matters of public.. policy -and ;,governance,
not easement. compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of :the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows .for the restoration of the former irrigation pond 'in whole or in. part:" This project
is not -a violation; it is -a- restoration of. a historiclandscape feature in, a town park that
enhances -the,park's scenic and. recreational. values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital :community
asset based on science and :established ' standards. rather than rhetoric sand
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sirois, Andrea
Sent:
Wednesday, April 1, 2026 3:31 PM
To:
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
Subject:
FW: Pond Restoration Project
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Frank Pones S
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 12:05 PM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond Restoration Project
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name (Frank Pones Sr) is different from their email address (coolvetman(Dcomcast.net), which may indicate
an impersonation attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before
replying or taking further action.
My wife and I Have lived o, it over 12 years now. We moved here from Marana
because of the golf course and the beautiful secure area. The entrance to our comfit and I munity was
also one of the reasons to move here. People wold come and take prom pictures, and wedding pictures
etc. Now every time we drive past it we get sick to to our stomach because it's so ugly.
We were pleased that the town of Oro Valley was finally going to fix our entrance so that we could be
proud of it again.
The reasons against renewing the pond are ridicules because reclaimed water is used on every golf
course in Oro Valley and in Tucson. So are you going to drain every water feature on all the golf courses in
Oro Valley? I know that sounds ridicules and the reason for not putting our water feature back in sounds
ridiculous also.
My Wife and I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore our vital community asset
based on science and established standards rather then rhetoric and exaggerated claims.
Sincerely
Delores and Frank Pones
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am rt for
he
oration of the VistosO
ails Nature
lting to express my strong e pond and to address recent centtcla mstmade by Archaeology Southwest.Preserve
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Residential 'Prcyet OW nc, V/Siosa ,��h (anfs --I'/
A kc( V(S Fold / I'A' is
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 3:31 PM
To: Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
Subject: FW: McKinley - Lackey Itr to OV Town Council
Attachments: McKinley - Lackey Itr to OV Town Council 1Apr26.pdf
Importance: High
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From:
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 11:48 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovaIleyaz.gov>
Cc: Ken McKinle,, ; Heidi Lacke,,
Subject: McKinley - Lackey Itr to OV Town Council
Importance: High
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (mckinlevkwacomcast net). Exercise caution when clicking links,
opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
OV Town Council,
I am an OV resident living in Rancho Vistoso since 2015. I've watched for a number of years now how Oro Valley
and the Preserve seemingly flounders when it comes to the pond restoration, which is a blatant eyesore to the
entire community. The Town Council finally voted to fund the pond restoration design based on strong community
support, design drawings are complete, and OV has received bids for the project.
I'm not understanding how Preserve, Archaeology Southwest is now opposing the restoration based on use of
reclaimed water, especially as the Town of Oro Valley owns 36 holes of public golf courses that utilizes reclaimed
water for their ponds and irrigation. Additionally, reclaimed water is one of Arizona's most valuable supply
sources and the state is a leader in water reuse, reclaiming about 183 million gallons of water per day.
The Town has already invested significant resources into this restoration and restoring the pond is essential to
addressing the current eyesore of the former pond and protecting our property values.
Regards,
KW McKinley
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
am writing to express my :strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
I. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts ;per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond .is not for
human .consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water:.Reclaimed water is a .standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation .of certain PFAS compounds .as hazardous
substances under CERCLA, does not prohibit its beneficial.:reuse in managedwater
features,. like -.those used in parks and, golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary .Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate -municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation -of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation .pond "in whole or in part.This project
is not a violation; it is a.restoration of a'historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the paws scenic and recreational values:
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community -
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
S/ncr y, f% _l - - - - --- -- - - -- -
.s
Oro Valley Resident
C�F�� 7.- _4,%
V.
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members, of the Town :C,ouncil,
t z,
am°wntin to express m y - strop su ort for the restora#ion ;.of thb Vistoso `Trails Nature
y
g . p y g�• pp
a Preserve,pond and to directly address recent claims made lby.Archaeology Southwest.
:.The oppos t* n' to this project relies .on`'sev_eral :fundamental .mischaracterizat ons of ;the`:
�{
law, science, and the Town's authority,: ;
?,
w °.Misuse of Regulatory Standards::;Tlie attempt to' apply a.;drLinking waterstandard of
.
4 parts per trillion to; a non=potable pond s,'factually irrelevant., This. pond ki not;,for"
i wlf,
human. consumption, and. Town regulations strictly';prohibit (swimming or wading, which:
removes, rimary
, p eXposure pathways..
2. Lawful .Use. of Reclaimed' Water Rec'laimed;.watOr` 9 :a standard; highlyr regulated'
;resource in Arizona: The EPA's designation of.:certain PEAS -compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not ,prohibit°li#s beneficial reuse in managed :water ;
features', like those.:used in parks'and',golf courses'.throughout Oro Valley`andlAnzona:
3: Lack of Budgetary Oversight.A's the.'easement.lhoader.; Archaeolog Southwest. iias
no legal authority,' to, demand; ,or dictate munici al bud et.: ri Y
tit ,
p g , p . orities. Decisions regarding
the 'allocation of funtls for To projects 'are Tnatters:of'public` policy ;and governance '
not' easement compliance:
A. Exp k it`Authorization: 'Par-agraphr 2 '6 of the Conservation ;Easement explicitly
:allows for the restoration of the forme"r,, irrig`ation tpond "in whole ;or m part ":.This ° ro ect
is not a violation it' is a., restoration of� a, `historic, aandsca` :.:e featur P _ `�
` enhla `. _ p efirin ,a town ,`pa .k.'rthat:
nces the park's: scenic,.and "recreational values.
I' urge the Councilrto coritiriue with_ the` :a - „ s L
pproved ,planao restore ,ths'vital .commu;nity
asset based on. science and established standards 'rather than, rhetoric
exaggerated claims:
Oro' Valley .Rest "Fro r f,
fit yt
1' yti 1
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express rriy,strong support for the restoration -of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent ciaimsmade by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to -this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science; and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of RegulatoryStandards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts. -per trillion to a non -potable pond' is, factually irrelevant. This pond is hot for
human consumption, and Town regulations. strictly prohibit. swimming .or wading_, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful. Use of Reclaimed. Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation. of'certairi PFAS .compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout .Oro Valley- and Arizona.
3. Lack.of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder; Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand .or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the. Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation .pond "in. whole .or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in .a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values..
urge the Council to continueVith the, approved plan Ito restore this vital .community_
asset based on science and -established standards rather than rhetoric and.
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Wednesday, April 1, 2026, 3:32 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Vistoso Nature Trails Preserve
Scan04012026-4.pdf
From: Fred Arbogast
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 11:33 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso Nature Trails Preserve
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Please accept my apologies for the bad structure of this letter.
Mary_V Arbogast _
Sent from my iPad
1
D:ear Mayor winfeld::and ;Members ;of the Town C.ouncil,,
:`e Vis.o TrailsNature 'mstrop supportforterestoration of thtoexpressY
Preseive poctladresrecencimdebAhaeoly Southamogy:y= r
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental ,mischar..actenzatons,of the., ,
law; science, and. the Towns' :authority:
1. Misuse of .Regula#ory. Sta_ndards:.The. attempt to .apply :a drinking waterstandard :of
4 parts per' trillion t& a non potable Pond is. -factually irrelevant. ,This pond pis .not for
human.consurn _tion, and Town regulations stri p ctly .p.rohibit swimming or wading;.whioh
removes primary .exposure pathways.
2., Lawful Use of Reclaimed water Reclain ed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona: The EPA's designation of certain PEAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does, not ,prohibit' its b_onef cial reuse in 'managed water
ivro�,,Iike those, used in parks and', golf courses. throughout''O Valley and Arizona `
3. Lack ,,of Budgetary Overs. g`ht: As the 'easement holder,, Archaeology Southwest has:
no legal authority to:demand or dictate. municipal b' ft t� priorities. Decisions regarding :
the} 4allocation of funds fo:rTown projects; :are matters of public policy and governance;,
not O$ement'comp�liance.
4. Explicit Authorisation. Paragraph `2 6 ,of the Conservation, Easement explicitly
allows: for the: restoration of the former irrigation pond. " in whole or, impart: This .project t
is n'ot ai ,violation; it is a restoration of a bisto.ric: landscape feature in.,a town ,park that
enhances,the-,park's,-scehic: and recreatbnalvalues.
I'. ur 0,111e Council. to continue'with thel vapproved :plan to>lrestore'�this vital°,,O M -nity.
asset based; on science and established standards rather :than :rhetoric .and
`Oaggetated,. dlaims.
;er
Or-o Valle :.�
Y r4 c y. a .cc� vrc ..
J . 4 {
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Wednesday, April 1, 2026 3:32 PM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Restoration Of Vistoso Nature Trails Preserve
Scan04012026-3.pdf
From: Fred Arbogas'�,
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 11:21 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Restoration Of Vistoso Nature Trails Preserve
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Please accept my apologies for the non standard letter.
My Name Is: Fred C Arbogast
Sent from my iPad
1
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
1 am writing to express my strong. support for the restoration �of .the Vistoso'Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The. opposition to this project relies on :several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
laws: science, and the Town's authority:
I. Misuse of Regulatoryttandards: The attempt to apply a drinking waterstandard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is,factually irrelevant. This pond is ;not for
.human consumption, -and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading", -which
"removes primaryexposure;pathways.
2. Lawful. Use 'of Reclaimed Water:: Reclaimed water is a standard', highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation,of certain 'PFAS,Compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and. Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has.
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities: Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization:, Paragraph. 26 of the. Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for rthe, restoration of the former irrigation pond V7 whole or in part." This project
is hot.a violation; it its a restoration of a historic landscapefeature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values..
I urge the Council'to continue with the approved plan to restore. this vital community
asset based on science and ,established standard_ s rather than rhetoric_ and
exaggerated claims..
Sincerely,
t Y' Oro Valley Resident '
e,
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond. is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly-- regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit -its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and .governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely
,Y
i
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Wednesday, April 1, 2026 3:35 PM
Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael
FW: Vistoso HOA1 Signed Document from 591 W Quiet Springs Dr.
Liddell_591 W Quiet Springs Dr_2026-04-01.pdf
From: Garry Liddel'
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 11:01 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Vistoso HOA1 Signed Document from 591 W Quiet Springs Dr.
fWARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Hello folks,
Please see attached our signed document for our residence in HOA-1 Vistoso.
Sincerely,
Garry & Malinda Liddell
t
Dear Mayor Winfield .and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my, strong support for the re-st0rationof the Mistoso, Trails:
Preserve pond and to �directly address recent.ctai . ms -made, by Archaeology Southwest..
The opposition to this project. relies oh Several fundamental 0 . misIcharacteriza ions the
t f
law, science, and. the T0wWS-:9uthodt
'I. Misuse of Rogulatiory Standards: The attempt ,to apply -a drinking water standard of
4parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond .is -not for
human consumpt
ion,; Town regulations strictly prohibit swimmingor wading,. which
removes primary exposure --pathways.
2i, Lawful We of ,Reclaimed Watipr. Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's. designation of certain PFAS compounds as. hazardous
substances under CERCLA doesnot prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in.parks and golf courses throughout Oro ',Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack, of, Budgetaiy Oversight: ht! As the easement holder, er, Archaeologyh Southwest
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities_. Decisions regarding
the .allocation of -funds for Town projedts are matters of public po
licy governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: rization: Parag
raph 2.6 of the Coriservatio -n Eattement explicitly
a[lows, for the restoration 'Of the former, itrigeitiph pond "in whole or'in'- part."
is not a AoWlon.; it is a restoration ofa histotic'laridscape feature Ina town :park tha't
enhances the -park's scenic .and recreational values.
I urge. thetouncil tocontinue with the approved plan, to restore vital
this. vi Icommunity
i
asset based on science and establisbedstandards rather than rhetoric and
,exaggerated claims.
$J-hiPeriBlys.8 4ev� i
�r - ZZ
Oro. Valley 'Resident
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of ,the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support ,for the 'restoration .of the VistosoTrails Nature
Preserve ,pond ;and to -directly:address; recent claims made by Archaeology:Southwest.
The opposition -to, this .project relies on� several fundamental mischaracter nations of the
law; science,,and:the Town's`asuthority;
1: Misuse of Regulatory .Standards: The attempt .to _apply:a drinking'Water :standard of
4 _parts per trillion 'to anon -potable pond -is factually irrelevant: This pond ,is ;not for
human 'consumption, 6hd Town regulations.strictly prohibit :swim' ming ,orviadin:g, which
removes prima:ry-exposure -pathways.
2. °Lawful Use -of ;Reclaimed Water:::Reclaimed :viiater" is -a standard,` highly regulated
resource in Arizona. -The EPA's designation --of certain PFAS compounds_as hazardous
substances under CERCLA-does-not prohibifits beneficial reuse in manage, vater
features; like. those _used in parks and golf courses1ahroughout-Oro..:Valley `and Arizona. -
3. Lack -of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority -to demand or.dictote municipal 'budget,priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation" of funds fo_r Town projects:are matters of public policy and -governance,
not easement compliance. -
4. Explicit Authorization: _Paragraph 2.6 of the 'Conservation= Easement .explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond :"in whole or`in part:"This -project
is not a violation; it :is a restoration of, a historic landscape feature: in a tow_ n -park that
enhances the .park's scenic and recreational ..values:.
I urge the Council to,.continue with the approved plan to restore -this vital community
asset based -on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.'=
Sincerely,
Oro Valley'Resident
V 15TV� H'I60IN, Oej ? .
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Wednesday, April 1, 2026 3:40 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Pond restoration
scan0001.pdf
From: Kim Trigg
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 9:25 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond restoration
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (ktrioos gs-const.com). Exercise caution when clicking links, opening
attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
City Council and Mayor,
Please read attached letter in support of continued reconstruction of the eyesore former irrigation pond
on Vistoso Highlands Drive. Thank you.
Kim K. Triggs Winter Kim K. Triggs
1
i
i
1
t i
,t
i
t,
Dear_Mayor Winfeld :and Members of :the"Town Council;.
1
1 arn:wntin #o.. ex Tess m is- ron su ort -for the restoration of tf e: V stoso Trails: Nature
g P y g PP
Preserve._pond:.and to directly.:address recent claims made.;b� . Archaeolo
Y gySouthwest.
i'? The;;opposition #o thir.
sproject;-e'lies.,onaeverah:�fiu"ntlamental.mscharacterzaionsof t he
E Maw,_ �scierice,_and, #he: Town's authority: � _
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards.: Theattem t to.a I a rdrnkin
4 arts l P Pp y .._ g water stardard'�of
p . _ per:.tnllion :to a non potable pond. is; factual) ``irrelevant; This and is :not for
:human consumption, and Towa.°regulations strict) Y, roh bit. P
ti... ,.Y P-.. ..swimming or:wading, which:
removes, pnmary::exposure�;pathways:
Lawful Use of Reclatmecf wate'fjrReclaimetl water is astandard; highly.:regulated
resource in Arizona:,"The EPA's designation pI certain PEAS-:com ounds as=fia
P ,.zardous .
substances untler ,CERCLA does not:Orohibit its beneficial. reuse in managed water
P .
r: ti features, {dike .those used.n; parks; and.'golf_-courses hroughout Oro'Valley. antl. Arizona.
..
:3. Lack of::,B:uclgetary Oversight: As #he,easementaiolderNO- aeology tSou hwest ilas
no legal authority to. tlemand or dictate mun�cipaC budget�'Priorities. Decisions ;regarding
rthe allocation ,of funds for Town projec s'et matters, of public 'polio and.: overnan
:not..easement compliance:. y 9 ce,
4;. Explicit Authorization. Paragraph-2:6' of the: Conservation.Easement:ex .licit)
P y-
:allows for -the restoration of the forme(,irngation pond `4 .whole oriri art;" This ro'ect
P ... - :.P.- .J
is not _a violation, it is:a,.restoration.,of a histonc landscapefeature in a ow
n,,o,6iklhafOhhanbbd the parks. scenic: and :recreational values:
urge the .Council to continue wifh: the .a � rovetl Ian :to -restore #his, vital :community
PP P
asset based on science.:and :established `standards rather than, rtietonc and
exaggerated claims..
Sincerely
Oro Valley `Resident,
Stine, Michelle
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
Sirois, Andrea
Wednesday, April 1, 2026 3:39 PM
Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
FW: Letter to Town Council concerning Vistoso Trails pond feature
OV Pond Letter Chris M_2026.pdf; OV Pond Letter -Paul M._2026.pdf
From: Paul Moffet'
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 9:39 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Letter to Town Council concerning Vistoso Trails pond feature
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
This is the first time you received an email from this sender (paulmofCCDmsn.com). Exercise caution when clicking links, opening
attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Dear Mayor Winfield and Oro Valley Town Council,
Please see attached letters.
Thank you,
Paul Moffett
Christine Moffett
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I ,am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition. to this project relies on several fundamental .mischaracterizations of the,
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. `Misuse of .Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a'drinking water standard of
4 parts per :trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not: for
human, consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming orwading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard., highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit -its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, 'like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3..Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder,_ Archaeology .Southwest has
no .legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and, governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole, or -in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the .Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this, vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and.
exaggerated claims.
.Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident_
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Oro Valley Resident
Stine, Michelle
From: Sirois, Andrea
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 12:37 PM
To: Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle
Subject: FW: Pond Restoration Project
Sincerely,
Andrea Sirois
Executive Assistant
Town Manager, Mayor and Council
Town of Oro Valley
Direct Line: 520-229-4714
From: Frank Pones S
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 12:05 PM
To: Town Council <Council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Subject: Pond Restoration Project
WARNING: External Sender. Read Carefully. Report phishing.
Caution: The sender name (Frank Pones Sr) is different from their email address (coolvetman(o)comcast.net), which may indicate
an impersonation attempt. Verify the email's authenticity with the sender using your organization's trusted contact list before
replying or taking further action.
My wife and I Have lived of for over 12 years now. We moved here from Marana
because of the golf course and the beautiful secure area. The entrance to our comfit and I munity was
also one of the reasons to move here. People wold come and take prom pictures, and wedding pictures
etc. Now every time we drive past it we get sick to to our stomach because it's so ugly.
We were pleased that the town of Oro Valley was finally going to fix our entrance so that we could be
proud of it again.
The reasons against renewing the pond are ridicules because reclaimed water is used on every golf
course in Oro Valley and in Tucson. So are you going to drain every water feature on all the golf courses in
Oro Valley? I know that sounds ridicules and the reason for not putting our water feature back in sounds
ridiculous also.
My Wife and I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore our vital community asset
based on science and established standards rather then rhetoric and exaggerated claims.
Sincerely
Delores and Frank Pones
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority-
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water: Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PEAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole or in part." This project
is not a violation; it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims. F j I 10A
Sincerely, ^`
Oro Valley Resident
Dear Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for the restoration of the Vistoso Trails Nature
Preserve pond and to directly address recent claims made by Archaeology Southwest.
The opposition to this project relies on several fundamental mischaracterizations of the
law, science, and the Town's authority:
1. Misuse of Regulatory Standards: The attempt to apply a drinking water standard of
4 parts per trillion to a non -potable pond is factually irrelevant. This pond is not for
human consumption, and Town regulations strictly prohibit swimming or wading, which
removes primary exposure pathways.
2. Lawful Use of Reclaimed Water. Reclaimed water is a standard, highly regulated
resource in Arizona. The EPA's designation of certain PFAS compounds as hazardous
substances under CERCLA does not prohibit its beneficial reuse in managed water
features, like those used in parks and golf courses throughout Oro Valley and Arizona.
3. Lack of Budgetary Oversight: As the easement holder, Archaeology Southwest has
no legal authority to demand or dictate municipal budget priorities. Decisions regarding
the allocation of funds for Town projects are matters of public policy and governance,
not easement compliance.
4. Explicit Authorization: Paragraph 2.6 of the Conservation Easement explicitly
allows for the restoration of the former irrigation pond "in whole orin part." This project
is not a violation, it is a restoration of a historic landscape feature in a town park that
enhances the park's scenic and recreational values.
I urge the Council to continue with the approved plan to restore this vital community
asset based on science and established standards rather than rhetoric and
exaggerated claims.
Sincerely,
Dear Mayor Winfield and"M6mbers -of the Town Coun6l',
M, wiftin- g to"6` k rny . *Ong�;5u'PporI.,fbr e,restorati'o'.ofthe*Vis' th i ' to�o I press P T(ails Nature,
Pr ei*eir Vei 'pond,'and to I dir6ctly'adqress recent tla'jiiis riiAd'e'by.Archgieldio"gy-'So*LJi V h
West.
The ooposition'to thi-s proje6i relies on several fundamental mischaracteri ations o . M . he
Iz
law, science; and the TO'WW's- authority:
1.,:Misij:9& of 'Regulator A' dii d'
.y:,.3t4ndarft- Theatte ptjo cl'ply'a'drinkinq Water s an ar Of
p
4 parts-, per trillion -to a, non-pptakble pon.d'is'factualfy'.irreleva:n't- This ppnid,js 'nbt, for,
Duman consumption, -and. Town Peigulations stfl6t t', prohibkWmm _�fng or wadirid; whi6h
,removes, ppmary. "posqre., pat*a'Y's,
2. Lawful Use of Redia.im'ed,,Wat6r--.R6cialm-ed water is a.sta a CIO 9 a
resource in Arizona. ,Th&E.PA!i designatio'n''.6f _'cdqqin-PFAS- 'compounds as haza . rdous:
substances under CEWXAdoes .not prchibit"it& beri6ficial reuse in managed water
feature's, like thqse'used ' i rl,, parki, afid gqlf.6 0 -'rses.1hroughbut Qf6V4eY, grid Afin iaa-
0
3. Lack of thwd Budgetary OiqMlght: A-s the easibn�bhtfidrr ld�"- Arl* I' :'.S aeo ' ogy Ou Sties
no 16gal authority. to demand err dictate .Municrpal budget 'priorities-, Decisions: regarding
the allocation of, funds for T6wn projqctsare matters of public policy ,and; goverriance,,
not e-Isement,co'M"OHand6.
'
4.Explicit'Authd,riz'ation".-'.PAragr,I h2.6of�t�eCoii'se'ivafi6n.'IE6s6rn,bht'" 'H6
P exp My
allows , for
r the restoration of the former,iffigation pond' "in avhoqorin%part."'Thisproject
isnot a Vio"lation; it' is a restoration of a historic landscape feature'ina-toWn park the
at :
e'nfian,c6S"the,pa'r.k`s sicertic and recreaAlahal. v a-lues-
I urge the -Co ncil tc continue with th,e approved'plah to restore'this vitaVc6rrim-u'n'4,
asset based on silence e. ence and stablished.'s6ndardS'rather than . rhe . t6ric',and
exaggerated cfaim's;
Since
Oro Valley Res'Ident