HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1636) •'• AGENDA (Amended 12-11-98, 1:00 p.m.)
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
DECEMBER 16, 1998
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
In accordance with ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) to obtain legal advice regarding:
1. Countryside Water Service Area
2. Amphitheater School District High School Site Water Service
RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS -TOWN MANAGER
The Mayor
and Council mayconsider and/or take action on the items listed
below:
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE
MEETING
CALL TO
AUDIENCE -Accordingto the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the
Council mayonlydiscuss matters listed on the Town Council
Town
Agg "Call Matters brought up by the public under to Audience"
cannot be
discussed bythe Town Council as they have not been placed on
agenda. Anyitems must be addressed to the whole Council, not a
the g
specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please
specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
*** PRESENTATION OF 10 YEAR SERVICE AWARD TO COUNCIL MEMBER
CHERYL SKALSKY BY CATHY CONNOLLY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF
THE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES AND TOWNS***
***FALL 1998 CITIZENS PLANNING INSTITUTE GRADUATION***
❖ 25TH ANNIVERSARY STATUS REPORT
1. CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A. Minutes — November 30, 1998
B. Finance Report-- November 1998
C. Resolution No. (R)98iQiAccepting a waiver to the no access
easement to allow access to rear of lot for pool construction- Craig
Kimberly Baum, Lot 32, Copper Creek I, Block N
& K y
(R)98iApproval
D. Resolution
No. of contract with BJY, Inc. to
provide Building
Official and Plan Review Services to the Town of
Oro Valley
2. APPROVAL OF
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN PATH STEERING
COMMITTEE
3. APPOINTMENT OF DOUG WHITE TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION
ADVISORY BOARD
4. REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT
CODE REVISIONS
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
5. FORMATION AND APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE SOLID
WASTE MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE
6. ADOPTION OF EVALUATION CRITERIA AND WEIGHTS FOR THE
1999/2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
7. RESOLUTION NO. jR)98-100 DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD
THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT KNOWN AS "AMENDMENTS TO THE
ORO VALLEY ZONING
CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 14, ADDING A
NEW ARTICLE 14-3,
ROADWAY MEDIAN AND RIGHT-OF-WAY
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE TENANCE AND LIGHTING REGULATIONS
(CONTINUED FROM 12-2-98)
ORDINANCE NO. (0)98-488. PUBLlC HEARING ORD AMENDMENTS TO
THE ORO VALLEY ZONING
CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 14, ADDING
A NEW ARTICLE 14-3,
ROADWAY MEDIAN AND RIGHT-OF-WAY
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AND LIGHTING REGULATIONS
(CONTINUED FROM 12-2-98)
9. REQUEST TO HIRE THREE ADDITIONAL POLICE OFFICERS AND
AUTHORIZE FUNDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT
10. RESOLUTION NO. R 98-103 DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD
( )
THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT KNOWN AS "AMENDMENTS TO THE
1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE, SECTION 6-8-7 OF THE CODE OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
11. ORDINANCE NO. (0)98- 52 AMENDING THE ORO VALLEY TOWN
�
6-8-7, ADOPTION OF THE 1997 UNIFORM FIRE
CODE, SECTION
CODE
12. RESOLUTION NO. (R)98-104 ADOPTING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT WITH GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT FOR
PROVIDING A TOWN FIRE MARSHAL
13. AWARD OF BID ORO VALLEY PROJECT W09-0998 WATER PLANT
#23 PRODUCTION WELL AND 12" MAIN EXTENSION
14. OV129802 STONE CANYON I (NORTH) FINAL PIAT, LOTS 1-57,
COMMON AREAS A, B, C AND D, RANCHO VISTOSO
NEIGHBORHOOD
11, PARCELS C, D, E, AND AD (PROPERTY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST RTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO,
NORTH AND WEST
OF THE EXISTING GOLF CLUB AT RANCHO
VISTOSO)
CARL'S JR. AT ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER
15. OV12 97 18B C
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF ORACLE
ROAD AND SOUTH OF
FIRST AVENUE, IN THE ROONEY RANCH
PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD)
16. RESOLUTION NO. (R)98-105 AMENDING THE LOCAL TRAVEL
ALLOWANCE POLICY (COUNCiL POLICY NO. 1) FOR THE MAYOR
AND COUNCIL
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT
ENGINEER'S REPORT
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the
CALL. TO AUDIENCE Acco g
discuss matters listed on the Town Council
Town Council may only „
Matters brought upbythe public under "Call to Audience
Agenda. g
cannot
be discussed bythe Town Council, as they have not been placed
must be addressed to the whole Council, not a
on the agenda. Any items „
In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please
specific member. p er card.
specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speak
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED: 12/10/98
4:30 P.M.
LH
AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 12/11/98
1:00 p.m.
Ih
A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at
least 24 hours prior
to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. — 5:00p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If any person with a disability needs anytype of accommodation, please notify
Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 297-2591.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
have the right to speak during any
Members of the public posted public 9 P
those items not listed as a public hearing are for
hearing. However,
consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their
Members of the public may be allowed to speak on
business meeting.
these topics at the discretion of the Chair.
If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please
located on the
complete a speaker cardAgenda table at the back of the room
and give it to the Town Clerk.
Please indicate on the speaker card which
itemyou wish to speak on, or if number and topic you wish to speak p -
please specify what you wish to discuss when
during "Call to Audience", p fY
completing the blue speaker card.
Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on
the agenda which you are interested in addressing.
Please state your name and address for the record.
1. Speak oni on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please
2. p Y
will only your speech, you be allowed to address the Council
once regarding the topic being discussed.
3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. .
"Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you
4. During
wish.
5. Any member of the publicspeaking.
s eakin must speak in a courteous and
respectful manner to those present.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Status Report
of the 25th Anniversary Steering Committee to the Members of the Town Council
The steering committee for the 25th Anniversary Celebration has made a number of decisions
which have expanded and extended the celebration beyond that which had been contemplated
when the celebration was approved and budgeted by the Town Council. Given the degree of
change, we felt that it would be appropriate to advise the council members of our current plans.
At the July 15, 1998 Council meeting, the celebration was discussed as a single event designed
to assist both in celebrating the Town's accomplishments and in providing a unifying point of
pride for the residents. At the first meeting,the steering committee agreed that the goals and
objectives could best be met by expanding from a single event to a year-long celebration with
multiple events. The celebratory year will be from April 17, 1999 through April 16, 2000.
We determined that this could be accomplished by including multiple events and exhibits under
the unifying symbol or logo of the 25th anniversary. While the list is still being developed, we
believe that this approach will include:
1. Unique Town-Sponsored Events such as a Town Birthday Party (see attachment
for a description of this event) in April of 1999.
2. Other Town-Sponsored Events such as the 1999, 4th of July Celebration and the
meeting of the Arizona League of Cities and Towns (September 1999)
3. Civic Organization-Sponsored Events such as the Greater Oro Valley Arts
Council Arts and Music Festival in April(99) and the Oro Valley Jazz Festival in October(99) . In
addition, this category would include the Civic Orchestra of Tucson events such as the Pops
Concert at Sun City in May (99) and the performance of Handel's Messiah in late November or
early December(99).
These events are funded by the sponsoring organization but will gain additional publicity from
being included in the Town's anniversary press releases and advertising. The sponsoring
organizations, in turn will display the Town's anniversary logo in their programs and in their
advertising. In this way the Town and sponsoring organization will mutually support each other
at little or no cost to either group.
4. Self Funded Events such as a Holiday Party and Year 2000 Celebration in
December of 1999 and an Oro Valley Family Day in April of 2000. The planning for these events
is still at the conceptual stage, and centers on self funding through corporate donations or, if
necessary, through entrance fees. The town attorney will be involved in reviewing any corporate
solicitations to ensure that such activities are both legally and ethically appropriate.
5. Traveling Historical Exhibits. A sub-committee is developing an exhibit to
portray the Town's history and growth. This exhibit will be unveiled at the April 1999 Birthday
Party event but will also be displayed in banks, resorts and large commercial stores lobbies
throughout the year.
6. Display of a unique anniversary logo. This has been developed by Matt
Moutafis and will be separately shown to the Council. We intend to emphasize this logo
throughout the year. It will not only appear on the traveling historical exhibit and in Town
communications and advertising, but will also be imprinted;
a. on banners displayed on traffic signal and street light poles (with appropriate
permissions and signage display variances)
b. on front license plates displayed on all town vehicles (and available for purchase to
the general public)
c. on low cost souvenirs (such as ball point pens and water bottles) given free to
attendees at the April 99 birthday party.
7. Display of a banner or ribbon denoting the 25th anniversary year across the
carved wooden town logo in the Town Council Chambers at Town Hall.
To facilitate planning and organizing the various tasks, the steering committee has organized the
following sub-committees, some of which are not yet staffed.
1. Marketing & Publicity
2. Budget
3. Town History
4. Events
5. Funding and Contributions
6. Display Coordination
Attached, for your review, are;
1) a description of the planned April 17 birthday party,
2) a program of the musical events planned for the April 17-18 GOVAC sponsored Arts and
Music Festival (with which the birthday party will be paired),
3) a proposed list of rules for the Mayor and Town Council Chili Cookoff (which will be held
in conjunction with birthday party and festival) and
4) a current list of the events which have been identified and/or are planned for the
anniversary year.
While much planning and organizational work remains to be done, we need to move forward with
the identification of dates and venues for the specific unique events. In some cases this is
particularly important as other, non Oro Valley, year 2000 events will create compassion for the
venues. In addition, while we are several months prior to the April Arts and Music festival and
Birthday Party, which will be the start of our celebratory year; we are near the point where we
will have to commit funds to the production of awards, souvenirs, banners, etc., bearing the 25th
anniversary logo. Therefore , unless there are objections from the Council,we plan to begin
implementing the plans as presented.
We anticipate that further status reports will be presented as plans for significant events warrant.
Respectfully submitted by
ito/
Oro Valley 25th Anniversary Steering Committee
per Richard Izen
GOVAC Arts& Music Festival and Oro Valley Birthday Party
The 25th Anniversary birthday party will be held at Dennis Weaver Park on April 17, 1999 in
conjunction with the first day of the two-day Greater Oro Valley Arts Council Arts and Music
Festival. The Arts and Music festival provides a place for artists to exhibit and sell their works
and stages for a variety of musical groups to perform both for an adult and a youth venue. A
copy of the program of musical events is attached. The festival also provides a number of
amusements for younger children including a jumping castle, clowns and face painting.
In addition to the events normally planned by GOVAC for the festival, the following additional
events are tentatively scheduled for the birthday party.
10:00 am to 6:00 pm Free Ice Cream and Cake
Display of Town History
Displays of Town Services and Plans (including zoning, library, parks,
transit, police and (both) fire companies
Displays of other groups available to Oro Valley (not fully defined but
intended to include youth and senior sport groups, service clubs,
scouting and cultural groups)
Equipment Displays of fire equipment, public works equipment and
police vehicles
Police K-9 units demonstration (time to be defined)
Police 'Fast Pitch' demonstration in which radar units are used to time
the speed of baseballs thrown by spectators
Dunk Tank fund-raiser for Police selected charity
12:00 am to 2:00 pm Mayor and Town Council Chili Cookoff(draft rules attached)
3:00 pm Presentation of Awards to prior and current Mayors and
Council Members
6:00 pm to 10:00 pm Informal dance at CDO High School Gymnasium (Open to all, but the
music will have been selected by the high school students) This dance
is being planned and organized by a subcommittee of CDO students and
may include a dance contest or contests.
oro valley
ARTS & MUSIC FESTIVAL
CELEBRATES MUSIC & ARTAROUND THE WORLD
PRESENTED BY GREATER ORO VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL
SATURDAY APRIL 17
MAIN STAGE KIDS' STAGE
10:00 AM - JURIED ART SHOW OPENS 10:00 AM - CHILDREN'S FUN AREA OPENS
10:30 AM - HARARE - SOUTH AFRICAN 11:30 PM - HARARE DEMO FOR CHILDREN
Marimba and Drums Marimba& Drums & South African stories
Leader Joe HIupheka Bayana
12:15 AM - ARIZONA SYMPHONIC WINDS 1:15 PM - AZ SYMPHONIC WINDS
Music of Vienna, waltzes and more Musical Instrument Petting Zoo-Children can play!
Conductor Laszlo Veres
2:00 PM - ARIZONA BALALA[KA ORCHESTRA
KALINKA RUSSIAN DANCERS 3:00 PM - SOUTHWEST STRING QUARTET
Music and dance of Russia Introduction to String Instruments, 01' MacDonald
Had a Ranch, Little Red Cowboy
3:45 PM - MARIACHI TIERA DEL SOL J a
Music of Mexico `71
Leader Jaime Ballesteros
SUNDAY APRIL 18
11:30 AM - JURIED ART SHOW OPENS 11:30 AM - CHILDREN'S FUN AREA OPENS
12:00 PM - SEVEN PIPERS & DRUMS 1:00 PM - HIGHLAND DANCERS
HIGHLAND DANCER -PARADE Children learn the Fling
Young and older come join in!
1:45 PM - TUCSON CIVIC ORCHESTRA 2:45 PM - TUCSON CIVIC ORCHESTRA
Music of Russia, Germany, France + RAGTIME! Musical Instrument Petting Zoo, Children can play!
Conductor Dr. Herschel Kreloff
3:30 PM - BIG SWING FACE
American Popular Song 30's to the 60's
Leader Ed Uhlman
5:00 PM - ART SHOW CONCLUDES
PARK CLOSES AT 6:00 PM
DENNIS WEAVER PARK
Special children's fun area, International,food concessions, Art auctions&raffles
FREE Lesson Certificate from Beaver's Band Box to Children attending Kids'Stage performances
Mayor and Town Council Chili Cookoff
Proposed Rules
1. Each of the 5 contestants (Mayor, Vice Mayor, and three Council Members) will form a
team to cook and serve chili. Teams may be any size ( but will have to more or less fit behind a
single eight-foot table). Team members may not sabotage competing teams fixings. Slanderous
comments on the taste and quality of other team's chili will not be considered sabotage.
2. Each team will select a name (e.g. Loomis' Luscious Chili) and select a favorite charity.
The 25th Anniversary Year Steering Committee will be notified of team names and charities by
the end of January (to allow appropriate publicity releases).
3. Each team will be furnished 25 pounds of ground beef, 25 (15-16 oz) cans of tomato
sauce, and 25 (15-16 oz) cans of kidney beans (larger cans may be used to yield approximately
the same ingredient quantity at the discretion of the 25th Anniversary Year Steering Committee-
comments on the discretion and judgment, or lack thereof, of said committee will be studiously
ignored). All spices and seasonings are to be furnished by the respective teams.
4. Each team will be furnished with large pots, ladles, gloves (thin, for sanitary and health
code reasons- not insulating gloves) as well as styrafoam bowls and plastic spoons in which to
serve the customers. Additional cooking instruments/ implements may be brought by each
team, as they desire. Each team will also be furnished a gas grill to cook and/or maintain the
warm chili. All pots ladles and grills must be returned after the contest is over. Teams may
retain their left over chili, if any.
5. On April 17 each team will set up and be prepared to serve chili from noon to at least 2
pm. Depending on demand, server speed and the desire to avoid left over chili, serving may
extend beyond 2 pm at each team's discretion. Chili may be prepared at the park (which will be
open at 10 am) or it may be previously prepared at another location and brought to the park for
warming and serving. It is anticipated that the ingredients will make about 200 half-cup servings
(a half-cup is about one ladle).
6. All proceeds will be donated to Charity. The 25th Anniversary Year Steering
Committee will arrange to sell packages of five chili tickets and one ballot for$3. (Single chili
tickets, without a ballot, will also be available for$1 each) Each chili ticket may be redeemed for
a half-cup serving at any of the five serving stations. The purchaser of five ticket packages,
having sampled the various chili preparations, may then indicate the preferred chili on the ballot
and return it to the ballot box on the table at which they purchased the ticket package.
7. At some point after 2 pm, the 25th Anniversary Year Steering Committee will count the
ballots and declare a winning team. All proceeds will be donated to the charity nominated by
that team. In addition, the winning team will have official Oro Valley Town Chili Bragging Rights
for the remainder of the 25th anniversary year.
25th Anniversary Events
List of Events Identified as of 12/11/98
Arts & Music Festival, Dennis Weaver Park (GOVAC) April 17-18, 1999
Birthday Party, Dennis Weaver Park(Town w/ GOVAC Arts& Music Festival) April 17
Informal Dance, CDO High School Gym (Town w CDO Students) April 17, 6:00 pm
Pops Concert, Sun City (Civic Orchestra of Tucson) May 8, 1999, 7:00 pm
Independence Day Celebration, location to be determined (Town) July 4, 1999
Arizona League of Cities&Towns Meeting, El Conquistador(Town) September 7-10, 1999
Jazz Festival, probably at Dennis Weaver Park (GOVAC) October, 1999
Handel's Messiah, Sun City (Sun City Singers&Civic Orchestra of Tucson) November 28,1999
or Early December, 1999
Holiday Party and Year 2000 Celebration, El Conquistador(Town) December 11,1999
Oro Valley Family Day, Dennis Weaver Park(Town) April 15, 2000
•
t
040, „a
��zsitut4
Aft 04a Vane 2S � Anntiue44a.0CeLelr4artoit EetY
a
o a
2000 /fit,/flo fJ0 .S
e Chairman:
Vice-Chairman:Imo- `oaf-i-E,
ee1 a t1O n Logistics:
PR: 42 44/ -
Pala* Police: 133 C-/GV /v1
Food: G- J Z'MJJ A-)
Events:
Program:
Other:
Date: December 11, 1999
Scope: A combined holiday party and Y2000 Celebration.
Acknowledging the best of Oro Valley's employees, volunteers and special
people who have taken us this far.. our first 25 years and will be there with us ...
giving us their best into the next millenium.
Place: Sheraton El Conquistador/main ballroom
Music: Holiday music live and recorded.
Time: 6-10:OOpm
Events:TBA
Food: Buffet
Budget: Seed$ 000
Donated $14,000
Employees: Nominal —
Volunteers: Cost—approximately $75 / couple
VIP: Cost - approximately $75 / couple
O'i1a
Le_ey.
e Alt 04a Valle* 2S 'g At1ti4444t Ce1e&'iatia,t Eeit
4v;
•
4,/
Chairman: /it,/ . Moil-7-4S
Da pin a Vice-Chairman:
aLogistics: ?=—'h6'
2000 K
PR: / v'L
Police: �-
Food: G,
Events:
Program:
Other:/ c— , -5/.r _
Date: Saturday April 15, 2000
Scope: A full day celebration of the 25th anniversary of our Town's founding combined
with a new millinium theme.
All citizens and guests admitted free... food... fun ....and games !
Place: Dennis Weaver Park(all fields).
Time: 7:3 Oam-5:3 Opm
Events:TBA A multitude of fun events; each designed to bring laughter,joy and good.
Food: Donated by major sponsors and exhibitors. Pancakes, bacon, coffee,juice, milk
And sweet rolls.
Hot dogs, hamburgers and soda.
Cake & ice cream.
Booths & hands on demonstrations and exhibits.
Music: DJ recorded music.
Schedule: 7:30-9:00am Breakfast (main area)
9:15-11:15 Events
11:30-2:OOpm Lunch (main area)
2:15-4:15pm Events
4:30-5:30pm Town thanks (special recognition)
Budget: Seed$ 1000
Donated: $ 49,000
Total budget: $50,000
A
MINUTES i- t
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL _' t :. :`
STUDY SESSION
NOVEMBER 30, 1998
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11,000 N LA CANADA
STUDY SESSION—AT OR AFTER 7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
TOWN COUNCIL : Paul Loomis, Mayor
Paul Parisi, Vice Mayor
Dick Johnson, Council Member
Francis LaSala, Council Member
ABSENT: Cheryl Skalsky, Council Member
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (PRESENTATION BY CATESBY
KNIGHT, CITY OF TUCSON)
Catesby Knight gave a presentation regarding NPDES which stands for National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. She stated the goal is to limit or eliminate
polluting discharges to waters in the United States. She stated this federal law will go
into effect on March 1999. Oro Valley is on the list because according to our 1990
Census, 2 census tracts in Oro Valley are considered to be urbanized (1,000 people per
square mile). As a municipality, it will become our responsibility to monitor all
construction sites, and industrial sites in Oro Valley to make sure they are following the
requirements.
Ms. Knight explained that a NPDES stormwater permit allows stormwater to leave your
site, and requires implementation of measures (Best Management Practices or BMPs) to
reduce or limit pollutants in stormwater to the maximum extent practical. She stated that
Oro Valley is one of the small municipalities automatically designated to be regulated for
the Phase II Stormwater Program. Other small cities & counties include Apache
Junction, Douglas, El Mirage, South Tucson, Tolleson, Yuma County, Chandler,
Guadalupe, Peoria, Surprise, Gilbert, Maricopa County, Pinal County, Paradise Valley,
Yuma.
Ms. Knight stated that six minimum control measures must be implemented by every
municipality targeted under the Phase II Stormwater Rules:
1. Public Education
2. Public Involvement
11-30-98 Oro Valley Council Study Session 2
Study Session
3. Detect and eliminate illicit discharges.
4. Control discharges from sites disturbing more than 1 acre.
5. Implement post construction controls for areas of new development and
significant redevelopment.
6. Pollution Prevention for Municipal Operations
Ms. Knight reviewed the following list of non-illicit discharges that are not prohibited:
• Landscape irrigation
• Uncontaminated ground water
• Fire hydrant flushing/fire fighting runoff
• Dechlorinated swimming pool discharges
• Discharges from potable water sources
• Individual residential car washing
• Water line flushing
• Air conditioning condense
Ms. Knight stressed the importance of educating the public, private and government
sectors:
• Proper use and disposal of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides
• Proper disposal of used oil, car maintenance
• Outreach to regulated agencies (Construction, Industry)
• Inreach to other city departments
• Outreach to schools
• Water harvesting
In answer to a request by Vice Mayor Parisi, Town Manager Chuck Sweet will look into
the possibility of disqualifying Oro Valley from this requirement due to the Town's
recent annexations.
In response to a question by Mr. Sweet, Ms. Knight stated that there may be 319H non-
point source grant funds available.
Ms. Knight pointed out that Phase II Stormwater requirements (Oro Valley) do not have
to sample stormwater, however, Phase I does (City of Tucson).
Public Works staff will meet with Ms. Knight to discuss the details of the requirement.
LA CANADA DRIVE EXTENSION STUDY—DISCUSSION
Curtis Lueck and Matthew Zoll, Consultants, reviewed the La Canada Drive Extension
project background and the project status.
Three alternatives were discussed regarding the potential alignments of the proposed
extension of La Canada Drive north from Tangerine Road to Moore Road.
11-30-98 Oro ValleyCouncil StudySession 3
Study Session
Mr. Lueck and Mr. Zoll recommended Alternative B, the Section Line-Transition East
Alternative. It was pointed out that all property owners affected by the road extension
have been contacted. Discussion followed regarding feedback received from the property
owners and the impact this alignment will have on the property owners.
Mr. Lueck suggested it is time for staff to begin discussions with the affected property
owners to reach a concensus for the best alignment for the area.
In answer to a question by Mayor Loomis, Mr. Zoll stated that the property owners are
willing to support this road improvement. However, one property owner is wanting to
sell her property to expand her nationally known business of working with people with
developmental disabilities, but is unable to do so until the final alignment of the road is
established.
David Hook, Town Engineer asked for feedback from the Council regarding how to solve
the Alden property issue.
It was pointed out that this road improvement is in the PAG Regional Transportation
Plan. This is a longstanding plan irrespective of jurisdictional boundaries.
Council Member Johnson left the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
Mayor Loomis asked that the option of shifting the road further east on the southern end
(by the post office) be explored.
Mr. Lueck stated the public workshop will be held on December 9, 1998.
Study Session recessed at 8:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kathryn Cuvelier, CMC
Town Clerk
L
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: David L. Andrews, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Finance Report For Month Ended October 1998
SUMMARY:
Attached to this communication is the Finance Report for the Month Ended October 31, 1998.
GENERAL RIND:
Selected points are as follows:
X Overall, sales tax collections may exceed the annual budget amount of$3,723K by about
$300,000 based on collections through October.
X Residential building permit fees are up 33% compared to the same time last year and may exceed
budget by approximately$310,000 based on the current trend.
X Hotel/motel sales tax including bed taxes are down by about 4% compared to the same time last
year.
X State/county shared revenues collections are tracking to budget.
X Departmental expenditures are within budget.
Other Funds
X State shared fuels taxes may be under budget by as much as $300,000 based on the current trend.
This revenue source will be closely monitored to determine the potential impact to the Highway
Fund.
X Townwide roadway impact fees, alternative water impact fees and water connection fees revenues
will meet or exceed budget.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2
Oro Valley Water Utility
X Current retained earnings are at$885,285.
X Water revenues will meet or possibly exceed budget.
X Capital expenses are below budget.
X Current cash balances are exceeding budget by $1,920,499.
(2iw�✓L
David L. Andrews
Finance Director
I/
Chuck S eet
Town Manager
CC: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
All Department Heads
Town of Oro Valley
GENERAL FUND
Budget Compared to Actuals Report
Through October 31,1998
Percentage
of Year
Completed
4/12=33.4%
1998/99 Percentage
October Y-T-D Total of Budget
Actuals Actuals Budget Completed
REVENUES:
Local Taxes $ 236,269 $ 962,444 $ 3,723,000 25.9%
State/County Shared 341,910 1,212,356 3,993,000 1 30.4%
Fines 18,051 70,538 1 233,000 30.3%
Licenses&Permits 108,880 432,407 1,001,000 43.2%
Charges for Services 12,681 74,378 _ 208,950 35.6%
Federal Grants 82,606 84,740 505,592 16.8%
State Grants 53,743 111,910 267,754 41.8%
Interest Earnings 29,996 99,049 240,000 41.3%
Miscellaneous 316 13,122 23,300 56.3%
Financing From Leases - - 129,000 0.0%
Carryforward 5,343,655
TOTAL REVENUES 884,452 3,060,944 15,668,251 29.6%
EXPENDITURES:
Town Council 5,863 19,283 68,197 28.3%
Town Clerk 20,447 66,821 ' 217,995 30.7%
Magistrate Court 41,436 121,430 363,499 33.4%
Town Manager 31,607 90,250 ♦ 351,895 25.6%
Economic Development 12,840 42,307 305,215 13.9%
Finance 34,220 89,264 300,964 29.7%
Legal 22,149 60,670 355,652 17.1%
Community Development Administration 22,849 59,062 201,453 29.3%
Planning&Zoning 71,227 173,474 891,524 19.5%
Parks&Recreation 53,648 197,324 632,654 31.2%
Police 485,140 1,321,660 4,644,354 28.5%
Police-Capital Contingency - - 147,795 0.0%
Building Safety 36,336 101,991 1 415,701 24.5%
Custodial&Facility Maintenance 6,281 20,158 189,050 10.7%
General Administration:
Operations&Maintenance 20,075 97,375 277,147 35.1%
Improvements - 3,468 6,000 57.8%
Vehicles&Equipment - - 53,500 0.0%
Land 200,000 0.0%
Transfers to Other Funds - - 2,936,746 0.0%
Contingency/Reserve 1 3,108,910
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 864,118 $ 2,464,537 $ 15,668,251 19.6%
REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 20,334 $ 596,407
FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1,1998 $ 5,880,790
CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 6,477,197 l
Town of Oro Valley
HIGHWAY FUND
Budget Compared to Actuals Report
Through October 31,1998
Percentage
of Year
Completed
4/12=33.4
1998/99 Percentage
October Y-T-D Total of Budget
Actuals Actuals Budget Completed
REVENUES:
State Shared Fuels Tax $ 60,637 $ 276,598 $ 1,577,000 17.5%
Other Revenues 10,186 33,003 57,500 57.4%
Financing From Leases - - 45,000 0.0%
Carryforward of Fund Balance 1,376,490
TOTAL REVENUES 70,823 309,601 3,055,990 18.4%
EXPENDITURES: _
Personnel 61,116 173,895 570,868 30.5%
Operations&Maintenance 27,368 85,468 386,750 22.1%
Street Improvements - - 150,000 0.0%
Capital Improvements (22,3 87) 20,562 499,000 4.1%
Equipment&Vehicles 1,442 4,592 79,000 5.8%
Lease Purchase Payments 16,518 16,518 51,100 32.3%
Contingency 1,319,272
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 84,057 $ 301,035 $ 3,055,990 17.3%
REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ (13,234) $ 8,566
FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 1998 $ 1,462,087
CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 1,470,653
Town of Oro Valley
OTHER FUNDS
Budget Compared to Actuals Report
Through October 31,1998
Percentage
of Year
Completed
4/12=33.4%
1998/99 Percentage
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FUND October Y-T-D Total of Budget
Actuals Actuals Budget Completed
REVENUES:
Local Transportation Assistance Funds $ 25,563 $ 46,824 $ 145,000 32.3%
Other 1,350 6,035 30,320 19.9%
Carryforward of Fund Balance 72,632
TOTAL REVENUES 26,913 52,859 247,952 30.2%
EXPENDITURES:
Personnel 12,367 31,568 145,982 21.6%
Operations&Maintenance 1,692 7,176 58,430 12.3%
Equipment - - 7,500 0.0%
Contingency 36,040
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 14,059 r $ 38,744 $ 247,952 18.3%
REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 12,854 $ 14,115
FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 1998 $ 91,290
CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 105,405
1998/99 Percentage
TOWNWIDE ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT October Y-T-D Total of Budget
IMPACT FEES Actuals Actuals Budget Completed
REVENUES:
PAG Reimbursement $ - $ - $ 500,000 0.0%
La Canada Drive Improvements 632 7,593 - 100.0%
Interest-Investments 23,309 77,990 178,000 43.8%
Development Impact Fees 129,978 515,430 1,165,000 44.2%
Carryforward of Fund Balance - - 4,307,464
TOTAL REVENUES 153,919 601,013 6,150,464 9.8%
EXPENDITURES:
Improvements 3 8,821 47,610 1,723,000 2.8%
Contingency - - 4,427,464
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 38,821 $ 47,610 $ 6,150,464 2.8%
REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 115,098 $ 553,403
FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 1998 $ 4,591,238
CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 5,144,641
Town of Oro Valley
OTHER FUNDS
Budget Compared to Actuals Report
Through October 31,1998
Percentage
of Year
Completed
4/12=33.4
1998/99 Percentage
ALTERNATIVE WATER RESOURCES October Y-T-D Total of Budget
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Actuals Actuals Budget Completed
REVENUES:
Development Impact Fees $ 23,550 $ 93,420 $ 234,000 39.9%
Interest-Investments 2,570 8,386 10,000 83.9%
Carryforward of Fund Balance 411,377
TOTAL REVENUES 26,120 101,806 655,377 15.5%
EXPENDITURES:
Outside Professional Services 1,099 2,995 120,000 2.5%
Improvements - - 535,377 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,099 $ 2,995 $ 655,377 0.5%
REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 25,021 $ 98,811
FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 1998 $ 480,680
CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 579,491
1998/99 Percentage
ORO VALLEY WATER October Y-T-D Total of Budget
CONNECTION FEES Actuals Actuals Budget Completed
REVENUES:
Connection Fees $ 27,375 $ 112,021 $ 349,000 32.1%
Other 3,518 11,544 i - 100.0%
Carryforward of Fund Balance 232,223
TOTAL REVENUES 30,893 123,565 581,223 21.3%
EXPENDITURES:
Improvements - 15,971 20,000 79.9%
Debt Service Payments 73,290 0.0%
Contingency 487,943
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ 15,971 $ 581,233 2.7%
REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 30,893 $ 107,594
FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1,1998 1 $ 124,466
CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 232,060
Town of Oro Valley
ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY
Budgeted Income Statement
Through October 31,1998
Percentage
of Year
Completed
4/12=33.4
1998/99 Percentage
October Y-T-D Total of Budget
Actuals Actuals Budget Completed
OPERATING REVENUES:
Water Revenues $ 475,088 $ 1,482,374 $ 4,432,113 33.4%
Other 23,033 67,407 171,000 39.4%
TOTAL REVENUES 498,121 1,549,781 4,603,113 33.7%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Cost of sales&services 184,816 557,602 2,118,974 26.3%
Depreciation&Amortization 100,454 401,817 1,204,224 I 33.4%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 285,270 959,419 3,323,198 28.9%
OPERATING INCOME 212,851 590,362 1,279,915 46.1%
NONOPERATING REVENUES(EXPENSES)
Interest Income 24,849 78,478 200,000 39.2%
Financing from Leases - - 45,000 0.0%
Interest Expense 123,425 493,700 1,487,400 33.2%
TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUES
(EXPENSES) (98,576) (415,222) (1,242,400)
NET INCOME $ 114,275 $ 175,140 $ 37,515
RETAINED EARNINGS AT July 1,1998 $ 693,180 $ 467,271
CURRENT RETAINED EARNINGS $ 868,320 $ 504,786
CAPITAL BUDGET
Machinery&Equipment $ 2,676 $ 8,658 $ 44,500 19.5%
Vehicles - - 133,500 0.0%
Meters 1,421 25,159 56,300 44.7%
Wells - 3,944 320,000 1.2%
Booster Stations - 800 468,000 0.2%
Transmission/Distribution Main - 440 302,188 0.1%
Reservoirs - 7,300 721,000 1.0%
Hydrants - - 40,000 0.0%
Telemetry - 60,401 15,000 402.7%
Structures - - 85,000 0.0%
TOTAL CAPITAL BUDGET $ 4,097 $ 106,702 $ 2,185,488 4.9%
Town of Oro Valley
ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY
Statement of Cash Flows
Through October 31, 1998
Total
Actual &dot
Cash at July 1, 1998 $ 4,081,805 $ 3,435,714
Total Cash Collections 2,038,023 4,848,113
Total Cash Payments 2,059,891 6,131,861
Net Change in Cash (21,868) (1,283,748)
Current Cash Balance $ 4,059,937 * $ 2,151,966
c
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: Steven Faaborg, Civil Engineering Technician
RESOLUTION NO. (R)98- 101
SUBJECT: Request from Craig and Kimberly Baum for a temporary waiver of the no access
easement to their property from Copper Creek Drive. Their lot (lot 32 of Copper Creek I Block
N) fronts on Sunset Point Place.
SUMMARY:
Staff received a request from Mr. and Mrs. Baum to obtain temporary relief from the no access
easement on their lot along Copper Creek Drive. The Baum's wish to construct a pool in their
back yard, and will soon enter into a contract with Pioneer Pools to do so. The pool company
will then submit an application for review by the Building Codes and Planning and Zoning staff.
Landscaping, vegetation and trees, hinder access from the front to the back of the lot. The
Baum's would remove a section of the wall along Copper Creek Drive to provide access. The
opening in the wall would be sealed off during periods when construction is not under way.
Upon completion of the project, the wall and right-of-way would be restored to their pre-
construction condition. The Baum's have sought and obtained the support of the Copper Creek
Architectural Review Committee. Waivers to the no access easements in Copper Creek have
been granted in the past, including one a couple of years ago to a neighbor of the Baum's on the
other side of Copper Creek Drive and one last month on Silverleaf Drive.
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter from Copper Creek Homeowner's Association, site plan for pool.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF:
Given the circumstances of this request, staff recommends approval subject to:
1. The Baum's obtaining a Right-of-Way Use Permit from the Department of Public Works.
2. Access is used only for the purpose of pool construction.
3. A letter of approval from the Copper Creek Homeowner's Association shall be provided.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to approve Mr. and Mrs. Baum's request for temporary access from Copper Creek Drive
to lot 32 in Copper Creek I Block N subject to staff recommendations#1, 2 and 3 above.
or
I move to deny Mr. and Mrs. Baum's request for temporary access from Copper Creek Drive to
lot 32 in Copper Creek I Block N.
-p. • ent Hea�
/ A
Town Man.ger
RESOLUTION NO. (R)98-. 101
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, ACCEPTING A WAIVER TO THE NO
ACCESS EASEMENT TO ALLOW ACCESS TO THE REAR OF THEIR
LOT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A POOL.
WHEREAS, Mr. & Mrs. Craig Baum wish to have a pool
constructed in their back yard; and
WHEREAS, access to the back yard from the front of the lot is
hindered by limited room and existing landscaping; and
WHEREAS, access to the rear yard from Copper Creek Drive is
prevented by a no access easement; and
WHEREAS, the Copper Creek Architectural Review Committee
has no objection to the temporary waiver of said no access easement;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND
THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA:
That a temporary waiver be granted to the no access easement for
the purpose of pool construction.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of
the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this day of , 1998.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney
Date Date
Sent By: LEWIS MANAGEMENT RE; 5207421523; Nov-25-98 ' 1 :27; Page 2
4011111106
Association Management by LMR
Lewis Managrnent Resources, Inc.
November 25, 1998 7925-A N. Oracle Road, 4391
TUc3on, AZ 85704-6356
Kimberly
BaumCOPPER Phone: 742-5674
Crag and y742-1523
1244 W. Sunset Pointe Place Fax: 4
Tucson, AZ 85737
Dear Craig and Kierly:
Thankou for submitting your request for approval to install a pool at your home in Copper
y
Creek. Please be advised, that the Architectural Review Committee has recommended and the
Board has conditionally approved your submittal with the follower stipulations:
No : Thelat map reflects that the aces from Copper Creek Drive is a 1' no access
� the
easement. Asrequired,the Copper Creek Association advises you that you must obtain
approval of the Town of ono Valley to waive this 1' no access easement, prior to any
construction activities.
1. The exterior wail must be rebuilt to match the existing wall in elevation, stucco and
paintingwithin one week of installation of the swi pool.
2. A temporary solid barrier other than plastic fencing must be in place at all times at the
access site until the exterior wall has been replaced.
3. Any damage to the curb or sidewalk be repaired within 24 hours of the
4. Al material/debris construction must be contained within your backyard and the sidewalk
must remain clear and debris-free at all times,
your pool l will have a filtering system that requires backflushing, please be aware that
5.
Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley have ordinances regarding the discharge of
poolpublicam
water onto streets and sewer systems. The Copper Creek Association
prohibits backflushing onto common areas.
6. Pool equipment will be placed in the rear yard area behind the rear privacy wall.
The buffer and landscaping installed along Creek Drive shall be restored to its
7. ipre-construction condition(ie, all l ',ng plants, shrubs, rock ground cover, etc
.)
This letter must be signed by you and "Pool Company" and returned to our offices prior to
commencing work. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the contents of this
letter, P lease do not hesitate to contact me at 742-5674.
Sincerely Accepted and Approved:
d7r
.6.e.e
Mark Lewis Homeowner
For the Copper Creek Association
"Pool Company"
BY.
Its
Sent Ey: L.E.^WI6 MANAGEMENT RE; 5207421523; Nov-25 .98 11 :27; Rage 3/4
C+1
11,'14/9$
'ARC SUBMITTAL
Dear ARC,
?team review the attach pool/yard plan at the next ARC meeting
The contractor that will be building the pool is Pioneer Pools.
Construction is scheduled to start the first week of January A999.
our hi ss la44 W. sutStt Pointe Pl.is on the NW corner of Sunt Pointe and Copper Creek.
Silsoe access will be from Use Copper Creek side,J will be cling and saving the decorative rock;Ind
cacti. Upon completion I will mum this landscaping to its original canditto.
it is my understanding that your next ineeti g is 1 ZJ9/98, thus I will expect to hcar!rout the ARC soon
after that due. Please 1 free to c:t11 Ir y wirc vs bt;o if ctaril iciaion or Rsrther requirements itrc
nece$Stuy.
Thi you in advance for you Otcntion in this matter.
Craig Baum Kimberly 1330111
(Hums)/974451 t Work`I 469-9478
(Work) 794-1659
(Pagec)4464000
Sincerely.
610 &k.r.pn
Craig 0.Baum
TO Jr/led 22ST2t Le2S:01 salt7sLoes NOSJf.l. h0 Aue:wcfipt7: c3 86 S-noN
Sent By: LEWIS MANA3EMENT RE; 5207421523; Nov-25-98 11 :28; Page 4/4
, T3
1 1141 q.' . ! is ) iTv.4-41;11, - ot .4 i
I IP? •
tl ff
'
.3" I 1' i ME 1 Iiitri,-i"1 i , , . A li
1 ( -..,-,-,1,:, , ?, b. t,i'acii
44i ' '41 . j 1,1A.
11 i -� 3 fit
1 .7,Prl'4f
IfV'
*. .,-. ..,,
1140 \‘,. ,
. \,„
II ,
r i
• r
f ,
illi I' ' i
ea al
\rig.
, .,,,,,ii
a i.,... . • i.
al-- •
........, ...,
yr
,.( •,,„,
tril
et0 .,
4\':-- • ..
\ '''''';:l
\ \S
LLJ tl'' _:,20 , \ .. . * :
•
3\ '‘.6c.\
"\\ ' .-- .
....t 3 %
, \ .-k3'.
ItV.:eel...it' .,:,..,
1010- . ... •,'.'' ''''''''''''''*-.. -
r-
� f_
....-y
. ., e' 4%011 __._,_--.--.' ' ,...ii,
.4
SI
t
\\\
7 t ,ti.,_i
►ma -1
rL� :y r� 7 ±
r o. ! .�.
r.. pi ie
4 ji el!iii • I j . 64
i , 4 ,..,N
14 j4i4J4Fjs.. ! ';',..':,;! 4::
�4 114 f :; I. ,
�l '
313:3J d £2.S T 2t7Le2S:01. 6SL t b6,13ZS OT.LI N0Sa11 M03H-H1 d :WCC bts:S0 86 S3-C,10,1
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: Donald L. Chatfield, AICP, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH BJY, INC. TO PROVIDE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND
PLAN REVIEW SERVICES TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
BACKGROUND:
The Town of Oro Valley has been without a full-time building official since the retirement of Mr. Bob Maassen
last year. During the employment search, Don Chatfield, Community Development Director, has served as the
Acting Building Official. The demands of the Building Safety Division have made it necessary to utilize an
Interim Building Official until the new Building Administrator is hired.
SUMMARY:
In early November of this year, the Town Manager executed a short-term contract with BJY, Inc., a consulting
firm located in Phoenix, Arizona, to provide Interim Building Official and plan review services. Mr. Doug
lvlaples has been serving as the Town's Interim Building Official since that time and BJY, Inc. has been
assisting in plan review duties of the Building Safety Division. This arrangement has proved to be satisfactory
and we desire to continue this arrangement until the full-time Building Administrator is employed. We
anticipate that the Building Administrator will be in place by late February or early March of 1999. In
accordance with Town policies, we are asking for Town Council approval of the contract with BJY, Inc. until
that time.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The selection panel recommends that the Town Council approve the contract with BJY, Inc. to provide an
Interim Building Official and plan review services. The cost of the contract will be covered with cost savings
from the Building Safety Division's personnel budget, as the position of Building Administrator is vacant.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE a contract with BJY, Inc. to provide Building Official and plan review services to the
Town of Oro Valley until such time that the Town employs a full-time Building Administrator.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Contract from BJY, Inc.
1
i 1 ,! ,, ,; /►.
J
01
Community De = e •m=,t Di,-ctor
. 14AA/l
..40 /
Town Manager
F:\INDIVID\DLC\COMM_DEV\bjy.TCC
BJY INC►
Architecture • Engineering • Planning • Government$orvices
Date: December 9, 1998
ORO VALLEY
AMENDED
EXHIBIT "B"
Building Official 20 hours @$79.00 _.
Including travel time
Plan Review/ 10+Based on Valuation —Building Permit x .75 x .65
=BJY Fee
Example:, Building Permit $1,000.00
Plan Review $ 650.00 BJY Fee: $487.50
Inspections 8 hours ($60.00 —$240.00 per day
Travel 2 hours @$60.00 $120.00 per day
Town of Oro Valley 13.1Y Inc.
Chuck Sweet iltiam Ross Nelson
Town Manager Senior Vice President
Approved as to Form:
•
Tobin Sidles
Town Attorney
2390 E. CAMELBACK RD., SUITE 325 •PHOENIX, AZ 85016-3451 •602.954.8200 • Fax:602.954.0187 • 1.800.381.4066
Washington DC Austin Bethesda Houston Las Vegas Phoenix
Portland Salt Lake City Tucson
2
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: William A. Jansen,P.E., Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Appointment of the Oro Valley Pedestrian/Bicycle Plan Steering Committee
SUMMARY:
At the regular Town Council meeting of July 15, 1998, Mayor and Council approved a contract
with Curtis Lueck & Associates to develop a Town wide Pedestrian/Bicycle Path Plan. Since that
time, staff has met with the consultant to establish a project schedule and initiate other project
activities.
The first step in the plan development process is to appoint a plan development steering committee.
This committee will meet periodically to review documents and provide input on the plan as it
evolves. Staff and the consultant have recommended the following names.
Name Constituency or Relationship to the Town
Dick Johnson Town Council Member
Don Manspeaker Public Works Staff
Melissa Shaw Community Development Staff
Mike Stevenson Oro Valley Police Department
John Nesbit CDO High School
Richard Underwood Development Review Board
Bill Moody Planning&Zoning Commission
John Russell Parks Advisory Board
Arnold Balthazar Tucson Pima County Bicycle Advisory Council
Dick Schaffer Pima Association of Governments
William Hallinan Development Community
Bill Schreiber Town Citizen
Michael Jones Town Citizen
Karen Redig Town Citizen
Raymond Caryl Town Citizen
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Consultant's Recommended Steering Committee Composition
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no budgetary impact upon the Town of Oro Valley.
1-
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Public Works Department staff recommends the appointment of
the above named individuals.
SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following
motions.
I move to approve the appointment of the above named individuals to the Oro Valley Pedestrian/
Bicycle Plan Steering Committee.
41,„.______
,-4p. A c_,
i ment 'v d
Town Manager
FRCk1 : Matthew Zoll PHONE NO. : 520 323 2273 Aug. 07 1998 11:08AM P1
/ \ '7
,
>
TO: Bill Jansen t���1 tiny1;,IZ
.
-
FROM: Matthew Zo11 \„ - - -
DATE: Aug. 7, 1998 \'-',:‘ ,
RE: OV Bike/Ped ���
PAGES: 2 total `•;:.?.,,, .
.� � err f��
FAX: 297-0428 -''vZ •�,
Hi Bill
Enclosed is a list of potential agencies or entities for the Bike/Fed plan steering committee.
Matt
FROM : Matthew Zoll PHONE NO. : 520 323 2273 Aug. 07 1998 11:08AM P2
Mr. David Hook,P.E. March 5, 1998 2 of 4
The plan will be of interest to various sectors of the community, including
citizens, modal advocates, law enforcement agencies, land developers, home
owners groups, and school officials. A key group of up to 12 people is
suggested for the project-specific steering committee_ The committee should be
willing to meet periodically, review project documents, and provide input on the
plan as it evolves.
This steering committee should include 3 to 4 citizen re•resentatives
(including rple who can represent raolf cart and roller )ladinr issues)
and members from the folio ring croups:
• Town Council
• Public Works Department
Ptannlna Department
• Police Department
• School District
• Boards and Commissions
• Tucson-Pima County Bicycle, d�yisory
On?!nl �e
• Pima Association of Governments (Regional Bicycle Coordinator
• Development Community
Curtis Lueck&Associates 5780 West El Camino del Cerro Tucson,AZ 85745
520-743-8748 FAX 520-743-4210 E-mail CIS A S7ARNE'I:COM
1.
3
COUNCIL TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: Donald L. Chatfield, AICP, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF DOUGLAS WHITE TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY
BOARD
BACKGROUND:
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board currently has one vacancy, created by the resignation of a former
member of the body. Over the past several months, the Town has collected applications from citizens interested
in serving on the Board.
SUMMARY:
An advisory board selection panel was convened for several interview dates to consider the selection of a new
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board member. Mr. Fran LaSala, Council member, and Ms. Karen Baker,
Board Chair; convened to review applications. Staff support was provided by Mr. Don Chatfield, Community
Development Director convened. The panel interviewed six applicants for the vacant position and evaluated
their responses to questions related to the Board's activities.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The selection panel recommends that the Town Council appoint Mr. Douglas White to a two-year term, expiring
in June 2000. Mr. White demonstrated exceptional skills in parks and recreation leadership in his former
community of Payson, Arizona and he desires to provide similar contributions to the Town of Oro Valley.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPOINT Mr. Douglas White to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for a term of two-years,
expiring in June 2000.
1--- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION . - Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Oro Valley Board/Commission Application from Mr. Douglas White
Co v.-unity De 1 p• : t D rector
/ /
40 . ' ;, 1
Town Manager
F:\INDIVID\DLC\COMM_DEV\prab.TCC
5202972591 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY F-213 T-228 P-002 8EP 28 '98 1 v,:iJ.:,
ft
°
e °ti
��}t`�'r •1 tb, b- ix•Y DZIRMIETICt %MAYOR � �As
FLU
".4 ����� AGEfl CAG (); \ DEPT HEADS 1p OM
,. t r'.. CdL fia
t, s,
'bumpea,4' cm,..70( t 1(104-
*(3' 0-14 a 42=
QRO VALLEY BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION
Dear Oro Valley Citizen:
We appreciate your
interest in the Town of Oro Valley. Enclosed is an informational form which
when completed will allow us to quickly process your application.
your the information optional,asked for is o tionalsupplying the information will greatly assist in
ofeducation, experience and background to allow the best possible use of your
an understa.ndrng p youkindly Valley and for which wetalents which are so
willing to provide to the Town of Oro
thank you.
Please return tothe Town Clerk's Office. 11.000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona
85737-7015.
Name.--.-: '= -_ -,.•
Last First Middle
Home Address -2_ Z '�_.-.-.-.) - �� c-,^ -- _ ...._.-,.,C"'N -
Business Address- cr= `' - ._,
, -�_ ,�' ._.�.,-�,�,- Business Phone ���---�'C`�Home Phone 2-5__j_________ ..—_,_._._r------ -
Num
Number of Years in Oro Valley cam-- ` r— — —
-- �
nature Date
ease state which board/commission you wish to join and wh
Please list other community, civic, professional, social, educational, cultural or athletic
,
organizations you have been affiliated with. length of time. any office held, and any achievements
in those organizations you feel are noteworthy.
'7s (.... C.-) s .- . ~ -
� �Com-,.-,��'-'-r -.I.' -Nc1.,-- �:.CC�G.. -v >c'_c.- - �-E--
'R'`� 7 Gam•C,.:__'<'-N- • C...- "*. `-`1/4--'' -1'E_.. t_._,G,...<"-' . -4"- ----- C-:---C:--- -
.4'-' S.,._.... ....
---- C-:---C-- -
• • 5202972591 TOWN OF OPO UALLE'Y F-213 T-228 P-093 SEP 28 '98 19:03
0
ma ;,,.,: ''_ "":".c.,. .\.,---. -, �--'._ -- ..\ �. .
--;; ;"' ''' ' "
• responsibility, skill or achievement: professionally and/or do you consider your highest p . .
personally, and why.
` � �j 1-,y-.t,. J C c....—... ... c•-,
(._........ .... sn,... .2.,..t? ,::-. -.9'.t= . ...‹- ..... \..... -,...., • -, • -- _
;--'<-V. --- :`‘ -
EMPLOYMENT
Please list previous employment. List your past or present employment first:
Dates of Employment
Company Name & Address
J._ -
5_
• Position & Job Description in numbered order as listed above)
(List Positron p
,S"s. -�(:Z C_L
-
-. v
C'
EDUCATION
Briefly describe your educational background:
Institution/School
Degree Received
1.1ENE... .. (:2... - ,—,,,, - . ...: - . -_ --- • C.- .. N.,..c-,,,,..._ ::.. .
5202972591 TOWN OF OPO VALLEY F-213 T-228 P-004 SEP 28 '98 10:04
4.
5.
Area of Study in numbered order as listed above:
Other fields of study, professional institutes, training program. etc:
IF DESIRED, FURTHER INFORMATION MAX BE ATTACHED
3
DOCIAPPFORM.KE02 W96
1998
Arizona Parks and Recreation
Association
VOLUNTEER
OF THE
YEAR
AWARD
DOUG WHITE
PAYSON, ARIZONA
Doug White was the Branch Manager for Wells Fargo go Bank in Payson, Arizona. He is
married with one daughter currently attendingmiddle school.scooi. The brief five year history
of Doug's involvement within the Payson community
Y is phenomenal. Doug has been
Rotary President, Chairman of the Payson Chamber of
Y Commerce, Member of the
Payson Rodeo Committee,AdultMayor's to the Ma y s Youth Advisory Committee as
well as Chairman of the Payson Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. Doug
actually has served on numerous other Town and local issue committees and groups.
Doug also was an active participant in most of the adult recreation programs as well as a
volunteer coach for youth sports teams. Asreviousl
p y stated, yes, he is still married and
continues to find time for family.
Doug recently was rewarded with aromotion within the Wells ells Fargo organization and
has moved to southern Arizona. Doug's departure wilt be a.major g P setback, however his
legacy will remain in the Rim Country. The most noticeable e impacts he has made in
Payson center on Parks and Recreation developments.
In brief, Doug was instrumental in the creation of the Mayor's Youth Advisory
Committee, keynoting the annual Youth Town Hall Conferences, coordinating dinating activities
at the Payson Youth Center, leading the charge for the 23 acre land acquisition
g for
Rumsey Park expansion, and a supporter of the controversiallinnova
. tive synthetic grass
installation project.
The two overall highlights that Doug can beroudest of and that Payson ayson is grateful for
are the Summer Concert Series at Green ValleyPark and the Rodeo
Relocation Project.
SUMMER CONCERT SERIES
The 1997-98 fiscal year in Payson was a status quo budget. Any new initiatives,
. g progr_m s
and activities were eliminated from the budget. Town staff had tried to implement mplement a
summer concert series at our new parks amphitheater. This concept was red lined ned which
didn't sit well with Mr. White. On his own, Dougdecided to address the he Town Council
as a private citizen and laid out his plan. With the use of bed tax dollars Doug asked for
and received permission to book seven bands to perform on consecutive Saturday _
evenings in the new Green Valley Park Amphitheater. J
This program has been such a success that annual fundinghas been secured
,, as wellasa
$30,000.00 capital improvement allocation for aer
ermanent performing p g arts stage.
RODEO GROUNDS RELOCATION PROJECT
A master plan for the development of Rumsey Park was completed in 1993. Annual
financial and construction efforts by the Town of Payson have gone on toward its
.
implementation. One major obstacle in the way of facility development has been the
relocation of the Payson Rodeo Grounds. This facility has hosted the annual Payson
Rodeo for 114 consecutive years. The worlds oldest continuous run. The Town had
acquired a 36 acre parcel on its' south end. In 1996, an extensive master plan was done
on the 36 acres depicting the new Payson Multi Event Center. The entire project came in
with a price tag of over$8 million dollars.
The price was enough to set the project back on..the Town's list of priorities. Doug then
took it upon himself to get the ball rolling by again paying a visit to the Town Council.
Doug pledged that he would raise the funds necessary to move the arena to the 36 acres,
and provide an interim arena location until the rest of the funding was in order. He also
promised that no Town funds will be used during this portion of the project.
Doug was off and running, gathering volunteers, conducting meetings and raising money.
Six months later Doug was standing on the 36 acre site watching D-8 Cats, Scrapers and
Dump Trucks begin to move mountains. Doug was responsible for$425,575.00 worth of
infrastructure improvements. A brief breakdown of donations:
ASL Consulting Engineers $25,000
APEX Land Surveying $20,000
Site Preparation $361,225
Tonto Apache Tribe,Bashas.Highline Civil Engineering,Roy Haught Excavating,Intermountain West.
Payson Concrete,Wadsworth Construction.Gila County, Gila Concrete,Sunstate Equipment.Ace
Hardware,Foxworth,Star Valley Lumber)
Payson Economic Development $10,000
Cardinael Business Planning $9350
$425,575
The monumental effort to move ahead with this project provided the groundwork for
development to continue. Doug's efforts have led to a contractual position funded
through Payson Economic Development to pursue further construction funds. The 1998
August Payson Rodeo should be the last one of its' kind held in the arena in Rumsey
Park.
The efforts of Doug White and his tremendous civic contributions of time and energy
should not go unnoticed. The positive change brought about by this one man's dedication
warrants this honor of award.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 4
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: Paul Nzomo, Development Reviewer
SUBJECT: FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CODE. (ORDINANCE # 80.) REVISION AND
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL APPOINTMENT OF TECHNICAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE (TAC)
BACKGROUND:
Staff proposes a code amendment, which will clarify the issues of floodplain and drainage in the Town.
Currently the Town has been working from a 1983 floodplain ordinance which was adapted from Pima County,
but as the Town grows most of the assumptions made at that time no longer apply to the Town. Hence the
current ordinance needs to be rewritten to address drainage standards and encroachment into floodplains as well
as penalties for not following the ordinance. This is item #3 in the subdivision engineer's work plan. Item #1
(Tangerine Road follow-up) is underway and item#2 (Development impacts) is considered less critical.
SUMMARY:
The staff respectfully requests that the Town Council appoint members to serve on a Technical Advisory
Committee to work with Planning and Public work Department staff, and, we suggest, for Council's
consideration, that the committee consist of the following.
A citizen representative, Michael Skilsky, P.E. •: r
A representative from the Development Review Board, Jim Vogelsberg, P.E.
A representative from the Pima County Flood Control District, Terry Hendricks, P.E.
A representative from the engineering community,Robert J. Smolinsky P.E., Arroyo Engineering.
A representative from the Public Works Department; Bill Jansen; P.E
Two representatives from the Community Development Department, Paul Nzomo and Cliff Lutich
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends changes to floodplain ordinance # 80, which will address criteria for encroaching into
floodplain and drainage standards for any development in the Town. If the Town Council elects to approve this
committee, Staff will prepare the appropriate amendments and background information for the June 16, 1999
'own Council meeting.
•
t •l .
+a1.1.Y..r•.w•-` ..w.t.._..a'r... .rLMaw.r,w. .r-......w+.. .-P1......t.. .._..w •.v..-._.... •-.v
Paget of 2
SUGGESTED MOTION: ;
/
I move to appoint the Technical Advisory Committee, as prese I d in the Staff - •o I. to assist in the revision to
the Town Floodplain ordinance.
4t _
00
P 4 ► in• a d zon'n, As 1i. istrator
I si
4' 1 I A . do, I,
•
Co► ►'ty Dev Io I e t Di ector
Town Manager
,
F:\Zonecode\floodpin\floodplaintac.doc
[..........
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TOWN OF ORO VALLEYMEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
5
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: David L. Andrews, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Formation and Appointment of Members to the Solid Waste Management Task Force
SUMMARY:
At the Council's November 18, 1998 Regular Session, staff presented research in regard to solid waste
management operations within the Town of Oro Valley. Council comments indicated Town interest with
respect to this issue and the formation of a task force, the Solid Waste Management Task Force.
Councilmember Johnson brought forward his concerns over this issue and his desire to be the Council
appointment to the task force.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on Council feedback, staff recommends the formation and following appointments to the Solid Waste
Management Task Force:
Councilmember Dick Johnson
Richard(Dick) Izen, Citizen
Mark Lewis, Citizen
Rob Felix, Sun City Community Association
Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
Jim Hossley, Public Works Department
David Andrews, Finance Director
Due to time constraints, additional appointments from citizens at large may be brought forth at the regular
meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Council Communication dated November 18, 1998
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to approve the formation of the Solid Waste Management Task Force including those appointments
outlined in this Council Communication.
or
I move to . . .
(7Z
David L. Andrews
Finance Director
Chuck Swe t
Town Manager
r
/0
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TOWN OF ORO VALLEYMEETING DATE: November 18, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: David Andrews, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Research of Solid Waste Management Operations within the Town of Oro Valley
SUMMARY:
ThePurP ose of this agenda item is to discuss solid waste management services currently in practice by private
operators within the Town, and to request direction to staff regarding this issue.
Councilmember Johnson has received several comments and complaints from Oro Valley citizens who are not
pleased with the current practices of waste management service delivery. Multiple haulers within the same
neighborhoods pose a safety concern to residents and school children and also cause additional wear and tear on
g
Town streets. Redundant trip schedules also create additional air pollution. One possible solution to these
concerns would be for the Town of Oro Valley to develop and issue a request for proposals (RFP) for solid
waste management services within the Town's boundaries. The bid could then be awarded to a single contract
provider with the Town responsible for contract management and administration.
Staff would like direction from the full Council prior to proceeding any further on this issue.
Detailed Analysis:
There are approximately 10,300 residential households (25,000 population divided by 2.43 persons per
household, not adjusting for the multi-family housing factor) in Oro Valley.
order toprovide a quick assessment of the service levels and costs of solid waste management services
In
provided rovided to Town residents and businesses, staff contacted a community association and two property
.
management companies within Oro Valley.
Representatives resentatives from the Sun City Community Association, Cadden-Parfrey Services, and Lewis Management
Resources were contacted to attain waste collection service information. The following are synopses of that
E
information. 744 ��,� ,
fztctif Dv„ 50 °un Cltv Community Association2i-oqyi
� a
•. a-
0, , Lt.v
OieZ,) V— IlL 1
.„, L J., .. , -
• Approximately 2,488 homesl'i 14 -,, t 1 t k`
• 80% - 85% of service isprovided by Waste Management; the remaining 15% to 20% of service is provided
g
by two other private haulers
• Rate of$9.00P er month included two trash pickups per week; the number of pickups per week was recently
changed to one
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 4
• For an additional $4.00 per month, recycling services will be provided one time per week
• Commercial Solid Waste
• Fees for a 4 yard front loader are $101.25 per month for one pickup per week
• Fees for a 40 rolloff are $152per pickup (on an as needed basis) plus $25 per ton based on actual
yard
weight
Cadden-Parfrev Services
i
Cadden-Parfrey Services manageswseveral different homeowners associations throughout Pima County
including Valley. employee Oro Gem Rutford, an em loyee of Cadden-Parfrey, is responsible for 750 residential housing
units in the northwest area, most of which are in Oro Valley. Of those 750 units:
• 90% of solid waste collection services are provided by Waste Management; the remaining 10% is provided
by TNT Sanitation and Pima Environmental Services
• Rate of$9.75P er month includes two trash pickups per week and one recycling pickup per week
Included with this Council Communication is a summary of solid waste management services and rates for the
3,8
10 residential housingunits managed by Cadden-Parfrey Services throughout Pima County. Waste
Management providesapproximately services to a roximatel 90% of those units. Rates charged by all haulers range from
$7.50 to $10.00 per month for twice a week trash collection and once a week recycling services.
Lewis Management Resources
• Manages 920 residential housing units in Copper Creek and 1,000 units in Rancho Vistoso
• Of those units, 80% of solid waste collection services are provided by TNT Sanitation
• Rate of$8.00 per month includes two trash pickups per week
• Rate of$2.00 per month is optional for one day per week recycling
Waste• Managementprovides service for much of the remaining households at a rate of$9.00 per month
with optional recycling for an additional $4.00 per month
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 3 OF 4
SUMMARY ANALYSIS:
As indicated from the previously discussed detail, there exists a wide range of solid waste collection services
and related fees within the Town of Oro Valley. The following summary comments are based on preliminary
research and are offered in an attempt to sum up the results of information obtained from the various contacts.
• Residential trash collection services are provided to Town residents one to two times per week
• The cost of residential trash collection ranges from $8.00 to $9.75 per month
• Recycling services are usually optional and the service is provided at one collection per week at a cost
Y g
g
rang in from$2.00 to $4.00 per month. Recycling is included in the $9.75 monthly charge for Cadden-
Parfrey customers
• Waste Management and TNT Sanitation Services are the primary haulers for the associations that were
contacted
Additional Comments:
Comments and ideas were received from those contacted, including a citizen, Mr. Richard Izen.
• Service level considerations regarding special/annual events such as spring cleaning and Christmas tree
recycling drives
• Consideration for the disposal of toxic substances such as fuels, paints, and poisons
• Standardization of collection containers including size and color
• Consolidation of the collection of waste disposal fees with water utility bills
• Segregation of the Town into several districts with contracts to be awarded by district in order to stimulate
,
competition, compare service levels among providers, and provide for continued business opportunities for
P
small scale operators.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Summary of Cadden-Parfrey's Solid Waste Management Service Providers
2
Listingof Solid Waste Management Haulers located outside the City of Tucson in unicorporated Pima
County
3. Solid Waste Service Provider Information provided by Mr. Dick Izen
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 4 OF 4
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is seeking direction from the Council with regard to this issue.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
N/A
David L. Andrews
Finance Director /
/////t/ed, ' 4
huck Sweet
Town Manager
COodr or
CDDG ,� Sr < S
— �4r Z r
ME COMM(MOST OF —AVERAGE'�
USED
IN ASSOC. TOTAL ASSOC. FOR TOWN UNITS W.
MANAGE) USING WM PKC-UP AND l,`'`'
RECYCLE SERVICE --, 4-
$7.50 � EA�S�' 1�SUSIE SCOTT WASTE 100 1
MANAGEMENT
ANNETTE GARDNER WATSTE 100 10.00 NW 500
MANAGEMENT
Rf�ARD WATSTE 60 $7.50
TES NW 800
y
MANAGEMENT- .�.,
SNA EiAi.KO
1NATSTE 100 17.50 ALI. 500 r
MAN GEMENT
COLON-MATE0 WASTE 95 $9.50 - 650 tc
MANAGEMENT
ND
t A 5ARTEL WASTE 1 CO $9.50 All 650
Wim/
MANAGEMENT
WATSTE 90 -- $9.75
NW 750
GEM 4��JTFORD CMANAGEMENT
3.
2? 2,`glo
3�3'.3
— a
.0/0 ••
•
TOTAL P.02
4
jj.
520 8HZ 7709
MAY-18-1998 08:0B P t MA COUNTY 0eu 520 082 7709 F7.0,/02
ud Pima County.Aad is based on reports made to Puna Cue.tatY Ucpartzasn
This list Ns for vuts�de the City of Tucson u=unzacorpala
of Eaviroo eutai Quality by the waste haulers. •
PERMIT NO�Y�'S: CU!'�'rACT1TYpE a(
COMt�n' rRON'i1 ADDRESS =VT CEP/ARIAANCFISF.RV:C E AREA
FAX
741-773 3 sunt J03 4254 Dm�Nancy Sons
DESERT DWELLERS Variance. moo
P O. Box 34491 31311911 Residsaaal- ansncura ;tacks
D15pOS�.L v Tucson.63740 SA Manna*tut since 1991
ti•t 719 12.5 W. Vets Or 1001 Brandi and Keithapol►ke
DESERT p�-� +SYS Tuesin.41116 d30/911 RfssitlentiaLl and Commcmizi
5A•free Points.Gest Vatic'', Sshoat+ts
permit since t 99♦ _ —�
JD SERVICES 7S7 3T' :110 S. Kolb Rd. tiib �A C��r•owner ....... .
to
FAX: 750-t026 Tuesoa.AZ 35730 9n0/'9a Rs:ad
-.:nest 1cand Sw in r»cao?Tins C.santi
perms since 1997 _ __
---- �� =35a hum and Riehstd Cccs�don
1,.�D Y ,l'5 RESOURCES 576.1658 PO Box 702 onion Ra idend•i and CdrttMenlai
Mt. (,emes+oa..1.Z 33619SA .Mt. Lin
LTTtt sin= 1997
.— i34z �MRr yr Q•�s Rue`
.�nON .:95.:3L1 3:0=S. Oatttauc P1 �tdy ur i
P.�YLESS s,�� i'TTom. 35110 5/31191 ac.-mit sine: :591 � M -
�3 Z-0366 P O. Box 17031 4383 Mbar;Sassierr l vt ENVIRONMENTAL, P'outsrs� gins. 1131199 Rai4snasl and e: mzncTz:z1
� SERVICESVSERVICES3$269Lr'""arcs 1996 �`"I
, [
•
' Tia-9799 P.O. Bo32521 43.10MgHillPRO WAST tom.AZ 33733 11130/911 Rtswe:mai
SA -�uat'a area ,
"atm MCI i 99� _ - - — � �"�-
1111 S.r'rutczs �►�. 4261 l.slit sad Bob Rxic:i t'Fc
ROAORUNNER 19.96l:
FAX;5744411 Tvaon.AZ 35749 430‘91 Cam=j service Only
I
ROLL-OFFS S* -!lass Caunty. COT I.welds Ptnns Csun:r
peer ut,incr. :991
_ _ M
RUBBACE CONTROL 38167.50 1015 N.Cimaon
Mo.AZ 337:1 jZrT ? flush
4/10/9S Comilisecsal and
ges cos
'
� .A�i(�sSceviiie srrs
t
�ssr--am- :491
0i:-7S37 9300 3. First Mesa Trail 6154 Salah and ScanY� =10V
S ,f4 S COLLECTIONS 6d7-7537
Az 35731 3131191 -
-v�i1.Saawina '
perms since i995 -- i a]-6767 4660 N. Valley Park :477
TAT SANITATION7r.1r9ant3i -v,n�ce -: v
�.•�>(1! FAX ?43-��9 Ave S� .V W uta S`�'i In mean °%�+s Com►
"Noon. 3Os I
m;r,te isnc: :9sd _
1
,�• i191 S. Csila Anagazf 5290 •"�� vat ce 0n11r t
tr.-FT:MN MOUNTAIN '
10131:94 Res�°il''c,r' N
L 1 T pfl.AZ tS i3Sa •San :Cir 'c.1G sow) I
SANITATION a Q 3 ( •
t
vermle since i 396 --
FF 7 21.7403 Patios i S M '601 n &elm Con:vvcoon.!t O+ adn.
TUCSON ROLL 0 jUe�
z1lX:T�:�S i 1 i;e�o. .�.Z E3730 ;/ l i9s C t�osoa; p�g,�>m-•+►1 O��
Co
V .. t .{net s9_ _ -
y 3• 101 't CO W Glenn =?,17 ?Iowan C aenelis.GM. '=t i 3P%3
t USA SZ��3� � �,,.rstiat and .9estda►=p'-t-vsrtsRc! • J00 ,
L,�► FAX; 6z]-9'3 ►ucson.35'03 M301'91 Co SA .!Dims Ca�h.C07..tutiastds Firm C��:tY
Lf....weintut mice !911' �.•"-- .
I jZtil 1417 15eecto�oex-GM .Jo+ts 8esn
'467131 4300 W. ,ns 'imam= �1:n I
W.�.5;E .vt.���a►C 1�tE:�T6,1Ci9* C.niness�+�Resadcatuu • l
F�C: ?s•t-i 432 Tucson. SS7-t1 r�c:iri�:s�ttcv
Also owe z
Ince :°4t 5A .Pim..County.COT. 1c dvtside?- �Justr! ,
. Y
. . . • .I
• i . • : . ! •
.•_. • •
• .
. , .
• ! a.)•
E• • • • ,..= •.sa:
. . . . 0
•_ . • , c: • cni . .
. . .
: . • ' : . .
. . •
. . • . • i : loi , cts. , • o• -
.,.. •
. . •
_,
co•
.
• : E...
. • ,...
cu . aii,..._...
..=
J • . . , • i >. • • , cu, 0.. .......0.
. t....i • • C.)•...••
i •
• . : CD: : : CD; • ci): • i : (t1: 0 ''''•
' .• . • •
" .,' . • •
• • . • •
• • (/).
• a ' CU
.....,
.• CD•
„,,,...,...1 _ .... .
CA C: V) t....
: . •
. E •
:
ti) . ›,..
• .4- : 0: 0
03
"NV I . • • . . . •
•
. •
• • -
_•
• , . ,
•
. 6. .)
>.,„„ ••••.,....• A . : C.)•,..y. _it: _ 1....,
c____-. 5' (A•...-.-. cu. „w.•'10 5 c.
,-.. , ,.,=. 0 : low• n,' (1) , el.
.... : 0105: a ; CD, C: -,,,•- -•
• • .= . ....-. ,......: ,., ..., - ,-.
.,_ 4 . . • .
•
u)• • E• , 0! _ 'IC• r.1.11.
;41) '': = P ...• 0
• • u-• %- • 01 • U t (1) .• 6-• E-•-z• --
V \., • , . • . a); . • • o' 0- • • .2- cia"•:5• ,,,,,. ! 0.0 C: (1) Cl)
..•w! •..... ...... ' 6.
. • • > • • •13. •:.: • • • • Cn,..! 7,...• . C: X:>'I. • :....7 in CO ''
• : : C13
• c -.5. . a) r.,:.• ›... = .=•cts. %.... (V bei it). 0 01
. . •MUM . = 10111. 1., .....m. 12 1:1 '.... FTV W I ,
( %.. ...• C U)• ; 03• --..., CD I -0, (in:1" 164,, ......... .%...
0
c..,-...... :111
• ' CaiTil; Citr! ‘•••• ! 0! . '.. • +
‘ • • • •
. •
: . C.:°. ' • * =• '... : • .: 0 : CD:0! ..=115. 0! C: >". C ....
: .25.a) 13 ......•
.....• ' :U17..CD a'= cl....- ..,., Za >6 ,- 7jegl• g =
6. =.0); cry. (-) w ..o. >6 -• co
, , I= o• . , a): cn (LI : : • .... .._. (I): ,i- ---,:-2:• _ 0:1...•
. • : • 0 0 ;=•...• ,....,
. ,,.., , .....•
• , ' ' to• (37; ..=:0.)' • W• "•7:1 1...' (I): E
•
1:2 .2--..a).'a•• COS.4' .''''.....>1'6"5 Ci t•T‘C:31••..•
‘'' IS.0 =• al.
' . .0.. 0 ,.., -*.. (..): 0:x2: : 0;c• -•-- t..); •re. - %-
\ . • . •..- cn ' ascn '7 RI.7___...._.
C •-• .. ti) ul: Q• CD. or Es u 13 *-.-=',• (D:E al
. ... Cii " 2 ..... Ca .=
...... (..). 43): "' 42). cl,)• c • a6 6-. 0: c- =- •
..c t--...., ,,,.,--• >,... --, - • %... >- b-- ....-: -• a):"-§-,
.c. .... ,.„, . ,0..Cr)!......,: ay, E ; a ....• C.)• '1"!.... -
. . ....... •-• quo.c.4
•
p z ... ,,,
db 13. r/•g: CZ ........, 0 cn.... 6-. CD MI
• .....z ...‹ 2 a) a) CJ C/) CL). 4):.6.. =. Fr• -• • -. ›.• (1). -
T.. C ..• ,r. N: CP, > C• Y C D' (..). 0 N =•0
ar.424. .... ...... ,..., a)• wen CD 0 6. .....••• • 4...
#.
-w-' ..S. - = ......• ..... ,.,,, ..."" c: 0• 1.-
-- • - t... -. • 0
Cl) ____c3. ›.„, ",„,,,_-0---.., pl....0: a). 9.....---= ....„,
. ... ,.... 0
.a..d ...1) >.• a) (1) 0 ..... 4,)• - v.: 0•-: - u). C. C• C7).1.-: hia'CV T)
a). e,› CNI•7-.: C.). C... V)
CO2= ..„, uf*.cts• cn 1-1),_ . 6- 7. C:ct • =--
. 6-• =: tu -. 0, .,,..„>", CCT; Cl, : 0 .-6-
,„,„„ ,,,,,,! : ,,,,,•..,_• ....• in ,-.. C ....•V)
• Z ": )• i'd. Cl) a C. F1- -T3•.11.1• a... ir-..‘J .=• RI .-- -§•..A.. `'''
>....... = ,.....
=. a._ cl.... .
• . u • 0: • 1.64• 'Is
i
C/3 . •. . ,w;• cu• CT3 t• : =1.... .4; CO. =1 CO; 9....., =•=•CO:=' 0'. w >
w Ct (..).= CO 03 0 5 C= aa cc• ":5 5 03;1--.N-< ....1. k.".J
...... . . . . . •
.17 1... . C. • • . . . .
. : • •
<
4.. • • . ; I i , : . : : ' .. 7 :0 •
. . • 1 ; 4:D.
•,, . 0: cp•
I 1.1. • • . : ;
',...
C.. 0 6.
= • • • a) . , 03• 0 0
- . ......
. •
C.)
. .
. a) •
. : . c •,. •
.
.•
• . • •
. . f*.•
O P.
am CO • C
rm. 0 • • . all
1. • MINI
... . ; . : ..rn 7...
‘.... OM. •
.
• • •
• :41
(M) •-
.7.1. :5 • c • or . . u . . Cl.
. -
. . .. , •
. •
MN. • . • . • : • . •
• : u)
, . .
. -
. • • • . •
< 1 ...
1 •
. . . . ,..
= •
. . . • i : •
.:: . .
• . •
. : ,, . ; : •
•
• • .
..... •
.
. • • .
. : . ,...
. .
1 ,,„. .... . . • . . h..
. , , • . ....t. . .
, .
u .. = • . ...
0 ... ,..., •
c.., .:.... ,..
NMI .C: •••=10 • . .1111•11. • •
U. 2 . I- I- . .
........•
-......,..A_._.______
6. el
... " • h=
• ....• 1..
• = '
• .
i" ... =• • - ..• '
..• .. .... • !.=. • . .
6.• •• • P. .II: • :
.01111/ t t• Oil.
/.. .....•
C', ....
U) "".Z..
Rs 5 o a)
_ a • 0 0
i-- 2. 2 1-- 5 2 2
: .
. •
...- r) 1.... 11.3. 0 . . .
e'•• •1•...• :64,! • 'CI. •
' 1■.'" ' . I !Nr• . ' '
: V,
. •
0
.... 6, •
Of .
•
... • . . .
O . .
• • .
i-iii • ,
•
. . •
.
, •,
O . •
• i: co
..., a) • (1) .
. . .
1..
U = .0 . tO)
>. - LI . •
.• • • , . • ,
• -
. • • •
: • c• .
• ,
CG :NI- •MIND .
r . : •
I , •
, •
1 •..... • •C). Ni. •In ' C3• 0
•
tot
..,-• Efk 140. 0 tft . - CO ..• V*• . . 1,...
: . . . . . .
. .1`.. .
.- • ; . . ..0) . .
. .
• . ' . 1 tO, • '
. ; .
,
glim ' ' . . I . •
cn . . . •
• • .
co • . . . . . .
• • ,
h. •
1- . •
• . •
_ • . .
, : c . .•
, • C , ,
: .
- , ,
. . •
- . . • : ! • , . 0 ! : . .
c
,-.
. b..• . .
• =0 '
: • .- • .
C:7): • • . CO. •
• : • . > , • , • .
• • ' .
CS 2. . . .
• •
E
0
. :-.: • : • • I - • •uj : •
•
...,
2
• RI RI: cn• . . , . ! •
:
•... • cl)• '
i 1-- : : i ' ra . 1 ' • • i
> Tti: . <- '3... • GO.
L.
0 :I. U) all 0' . • Z. ,•-„„
•
C. 3
= Cl. • ...„, ' 1- Cl.
•
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
SUPPLEMENTAL
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
SUBJ: Supplemental Report - Appointment to Solid Waste Collection Task Force
SUMMARY:
Since the agenda and packets were distributed for this
evening's meeting, a number of
citizens have contacted the Town expressing interest in being appointed to the Solid
Waste Collection Task Force. Council Member Johnson has reviewed the attached list
- Exhibit "A" and requests Mayor and Council approval of same.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Exhibit "A"
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend that the citizens listed on Exhibit A be appointed to the Solid Waste
Management Task Force.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I make a motion to approve the citizens listed on Exhibit "A" to the Solid Waste
Management Task Force.
9
A ' i
.►iA. .//_
Chuck Swee
Town Manager
EXHIBIT "A"
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE
1. Virginia Kacprzak, Citizen Representative
2. Robert Hossler, Citizen Representative
3. Colleen Kessler, Citizen Representative
4. Paul Sobel, Citizen Representative
5. Bob Putnam, Citizen Representative
6. Rob Felix, Sun City Community Association
7. Daniel Griffen Jr., Citizen Representative
8. Hugo Rucholzke, Citizen Representative
9. Mark Lewis, LMR
10. Mark Platt, Citizen Representative
11. Ted Rivard, Cadden Parfrey Services
12. Fro Adams, Citizen Representative
13. Dick Izen, Citizen Representative
14. Dick Johnson, Council Member
15. Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
16. Jim Hossley, Public Works Department
17. David Andrews, Finance Director
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 6
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN—TECHNICAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE REPORT
BACKGROUND:
The CIP Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) has compiled a five-year needs assessment which is a list of
capital projects presented herewith as the second attachment (the first attachment is a preliminary estimate of
available funding). The TAC also developed recommended criteria and weights to evaluate each project for
funding. In January, the TAC will develop a recommended 1999-2000 CIP by rating each project (on a scale of
1 to 10) against the criteria and then multiplying the ratings by the weights assigned to those criteria. The sum
of these will give each project a number which, compared to other numbers, will'rank the project. The proposed
1999-2000 fiscal year capital budget will then be created by selecting the highest ranked projects for funding
until the available funds are allocated.
The evaluation criteria and weights are an important part of the process. On November 17th, the TAC held a
public workshop to present the evaluation criteria, weights, and projects to the public and solicit feedback.
Besides the TAC, 14 persons attended the workshop. The results of a survey presented at that meeting are
attached herewith. On December 4th, the TAC considered the public comments and adjusted the evaluation
criteria, weights, and projects accordingly. The TAC responses to the projects suggested by the public at the
workshop are included in the second page of the attached survey summary. The revised criteria and the
recommended weights are presented, as the final attachment to this report, for you approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
The TAC and Staff recommend approval of the attached evaluation criteria and weights. The TAC and Staff
also request that the Council provide direction to the TAC regarding any additional capital projects that they
wish to see included in the CIP.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
I move to approve the attached Capital Improvement Plan evaluation criteria and weights.
OR
I move to approve the attached Capital Improvement Plan evaluation criteria and weights with the following
changes ,:
•
•
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Preliminary FY 1999-2000 CIP Funding Summary
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2
2. Summary of FY 1999-2000 Project Requests
3. November 17, 1998 CIP Public Workshop Survey Summary
4. Recommended 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Plan Evaluation Criteria and Weights
/
, 6tyL
6
i
P - i���,d Zoning Administrator
11 I
I ,,,,1 IN 0 ,0' i it , / li di?
o 0.4 unity De pme. 'a irect•
4e i
own Manager
F:\PROJECTS\CIP\1999-00\99ciptc3.rpt
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
FY 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
FUNDING SUMMARY
General/Public Transportation Funds:
Total Funding $ 1,276,000
Less Debt Service 760,000
Unrestricted Amount $ 516,000
Highway Fund:
Total Funding $ 900,000
Less Debt Service 48,000
Unrestriced Amount $ 852,000
The$900,000 figure includes $700,000 of an estimated fund balance reserve of$1,250,000
at June 30, 1999.
Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fees:
$ 5,876,000
The $5,876,000 figure includes an estimated fund balance reserve of$4,711,000 and
$1,165,000 of impact fee collections in FY 1999/2000.
CDO Riverfront Park
(1998/99)
Certificates of Participation $ 479,000
General Fund Reserves 825,000
General Fund Loan/Repayment 1,084,000
Pima County Bond Funds 166,000
Total for CDO Riverfront Park $ 2,554,000
Town of Oro Valley
Capital Improvements Plan
FY 1999/2000 Project Requests
Description Amount
Project Request $ 362,000
Equipment Mobile Data Terminals
Park Maintenance Equipment
Motorized Street Broom
Motor Grader
Interactive Voice Response System 885,700
Municipal Facilities OV Communication Center Fire/EMS Dispatching $
Prisoner Processing/Release Area
CDO Riverfront Park; LRSP Heritage Fund Grant
Community Center $ 395,000
Parks & Recreation Dennis Weaver Park Improvements
Parking Improvements Adjacent to Dennis Weaver Park
West Lambert Lane Park $ 856,000
Streets &Roads Tangerine Road to Monterra to La Canada
Improvements Lambert Lane Safety Improvements
La Canada Drive Extension, Phase III
Rancho Vistoso Median Cut
Town Wide Drainage Basin Study
Calle Bonita/Calle Loma Linda
Town Wide Multi Purpose Path Development
Pecan Place Drainage Improvements
Town Wide Drainage Plan Implementation
$ 120,000
Traffic Signals Lambert/First Traffic Signal Installation $ 296,500
Vehicles Marked Patrol Vehicles (7)
Police Unmarked Administration Vehicles (2)
Park Maintenance Vehicle (1)
Townwide Pool Vehicle (1)
Van(1)
TOTAL $ 2,915,200
Summary of the CIP Public Workshop Survey
Zapital Improvement Plan Goals
The attendees were "given" $100 and asked how they would spend it on the CIP goals the criteria that are
used to evaluate projects. They also suggested additional goals that are listed under "Other". The results are
presented in the following table with the "Score" representing the average dollar value assigned to the goal.
Goal Score
Public Health, Safety and Welfare 16
Operations and Maintenance 11
Environmental Preservation 10
Economic Development 9
Service Levels 8
Public Desire 7
Fiscal Impact 7
Implements Locally Adopted Plans 7
Legal Ramifications 6
Relationship to Other Projects 3
Others (including): 16
Income Generation
Matching Funds
Reserves
Cultural Enhancement-Arts .
Traffic Control .•
. . ..
Parks&Recreation(Community Center)
Quality Education
Summary of the CIP Public Workshop Survey
(Continued)
Suggestions for Specific Projects
Attendees were also asked what specific projects they would like to see on the CIP. Their responses and the
recommendations of the TAC are:
Project Suggestion [number of"votes"] TAC Recommendation
Community Center [3] Project sheet submitted.
Senior Center (in Community Center) [2] Include in Community Center.
Library (more funds, include arts center) [3] Project sheet submitted.
Equestrian facility and trails to Parks [1] Project sheet submitted. Also the CIP will be used to
implement the POST and Parks Master Plan. The
equestrian facility is part of the CDO Riverfront Park
and trails are part of the POST Plan.
Places for kids to play-congregate [1] See above. This item is a part of the Parks and
Community Center master plans.
Water pipes coordinated for whole Town [1] Submit as a recommendation to Oro Valley Water.
Infrastructure to bring CAP and/or reclaimed water [1] Submit as a recommendation to Oro Valley Water.
Make the Rancho Vistoso median cut a high priority Project sheet submitted.
[1]
Widen First Avenue and make improvements Project sheet submitted.
immediately to accommodate Home Depot-Target [1]
Widen Tangerine from First to La Canada and perhaps Project sheet submitted.
La Cholla [1]
Sidewalks versus multi-purpose lanes on major This needs to be evaluated as part of the Town's
arterials [1] Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. When this plan is
adopted it will be implemented through the CIP.
Amphitheater& Arts Center [2] Project sheet submitted (CalMat).
Emergency Response Plan [1] This is not a CIP item. It is already being developed.
Open space not improved -- left natural (parks) [1] Project sheet submitted. This is part of the West
Lambert Lane Park and the Open Space acquisition
project sheets.
Traffic Light at Lambert and La Cholla [1] This will be submitted to the CIP when warranted by
traffic analysis. ,,
Left turn lanes on Lambert Lane [2] This was approved and funded as a part of last year's
CIP.
Consider Impact Fees to cover drainage studies and A_project was,submitted to this CIP for the drainage
other improvements needed to handle growth. [1] study.
Town-wide bike lanes (connect to Wilson K-8) [1] In the current year's,CIP as part of the Town's
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
• ti .
Recommended 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Plan Evaluation Criteria and Weights
After reviewingthe results of the Public Workshopand last year's evaluation criteria and their weightings, the
TAC recommends the same criteria with slightly different weights as presented below.
:TAC . �..r Public
T -1998-99
Criteria Recommended .: Workshop
• Weighting
Weighting Score,
Public Health, Safety and Welfare 95 16 95
Economic Development Impact • $4 t_ ; : _9, :• 84
p p
Environmental Preservation 84 .10 88
Fiscal Impact 77 7 84
on
Impact Operation and Maintenance 77 11 69
p p
Impact on Service Levels 71 8 71
Implements Locally Adopted Plans 71 7 66
Public Desire '67 7 73
Legal Ramifications • 56 ' • •• • 58
Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination. 52 3 • 49
•
•
•
,
i •
•
•
• a
•
•
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 7
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16th , 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL
FROM: David Marsh, Planner I
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION No. (R)98- 100DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN
DOCUMENT KNOWN AS "AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE
REVISED, CHAPTER 14, ADDING A NEW ARTICLE 14-3, ROADWAY MEDIAN AND
RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AND LIGHTING REGULATIONS"
SUMMARY:
If the Council elects to adopt the document known as "Amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised,
Chapter 14, Adding a New Article 14-3, Roadway Median and Right-of-Way Landscape Maintenance and
Lighting Regulations", as shown in Exhibit A, for the subject amendment by ordinance, action must be taken, in
the form of adoption of the attached resolution, to make said amendments a matter of public record.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Planning Staff recommends Council adoption of the referenced ordinance in Exhibit A. As such, approval of
this resolution is also recommended, which will make "Amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised,
Chapter 14, Adding a New Article 14-3, Roadway Median and Right-of-Way Landscape Maintenance and
Lighting Regulations" a public record.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to approve Resolution No. (R)98-100 that document known as`"Amendments to the Oro pp making Valley
Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 14, Adding a New Article 14-3, Roadway Median and Right-of-Way Landscape
Maintenance and Lighting Regulations", a public record.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. (R)98- loo
3t1-6A-4. Noctibtf.
l tLITtr-
ing and Zoning Administra r
Il
11 4 it* _ Aiiiiii .1
Co ',unity De f ep - tDi--ctor
/
...__..
. .1�Ak,' '//
,4
own anager
F:\ZONECODE\ZCR\ROW LAND\TCRES.RPT
RESOLUTION NO. (R)98- 100
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC
RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK AND ENTITLED
"AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 14, ADDING A
NEW ARTICLE 14-3, ROADWAY MEDIAN AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE AND LIGHTING REGULATIONS"; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY:
That certain document known as "Amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 14,
Adding a New Article 14-3, Roadway Median and Right-of-Way Landscape Maintenance and Lighting
Regulations", adopted by Ordinance No. (0)98- 100, is hereby declared to be a public record and three
copies are to remain on file in the office of the Town Clerk.
Whereas, it is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, an emergency is declared to exist, and this resolution shall be effective immediately upon its
passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 16th
day of December , 1998.
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 8
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16th, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL
FROM: Jim Copus, AICP, Senior Planner; David Marsh, Planner I
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. (0)98-48, AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE
REVISED, CHAPTER 14, ADDING A NEW ARTICLE 14-3, ROADWAY MEDIAN AND
RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AND LIGHTING REGULATIONS —
CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 2ND,1998
BACKGROUND:
This item was initiated by the Commission on July 3, 1996 based on a request filed by representatives of
Canada Hills, Rancho Vistoso and Copper Creek Homeowners' Associations and a subsequent amendment to
the Oro Valley General Plan for the Transportation/Circulation Element approved by the Town Council on May
1, 1996. The Commission directed Staff to establish a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to provide input
and review the ordinance prior to Commission review. The TAC met twice in July and August 1996 to develop
regulations and specifications for roadway median and right-of-way landscape maintenance and lighting
standards.
Those regulations and standards were presented to the Commission for review on October 1, 1996 and action on
November 13, 1996. In November, the Commission continued this item until January to allow the staff to
address comments made during the November meeting. On January 7, 1997, The Planning and Zoning
Commission, by a 7-0 vote, recommended denial of the proposal and asked the Council to reconsider the polices
previously adopted as a part of this issue. The proposed OVZCR Article 14-3 was then modified as a result of
the Commission's comments and sent to the TAC for review.' This item was scheduled for presentation to the
Town Council on February 5, 1997 and was then continued indefinitely. This item was also revisited by Town
Council at its November 2nd, 1998 study session, and continued by Town Council at its December 2nd,1998
meeting.
SUMMARY:
The consensus of the TAC from the start was that the Town should be very cautious about accepting privately
funded landscape in rights-of-way. The Committee, as well as Staffs research, indicated that most other
jurisdictions have determined that this practice is too costly and cumbersome to provide significant benefits to
the Town. Currently the costs to maintain the median and west streetscape along La Canada Drive from
Lambert Lane to Naranj a Drive is $1,043 a month, with an anticipated increase to $1,135. 'The maintenance
cost for the 1/4 mile area along the east side of La Canada Drive from Naranja Drive to Tangerine Road, and 1
mile section along Naranja Drive, west of La Canada Drive is $1,200 a month. The Town currently maintains
1.5 miles along Tangerine Road from First Avenue to Oracle Road at a monthly cost of$1,070 and 3/4 miles
along Oracle Road from Linda Vista Boulevard to Greenock Drive at a cost of$230 a month.
Staff has re-examined the costs to the Town if it were to assume the landscape responsibilities proposed by the
three HOA's at the standards proposed by the ordinance. The new standards, which provide less vegetation that
is now maintained by the HOAs, would cost approximately $686 permile, per month, or approximately $8236
per mile, per year, based upon estimates from a landscape architect. The seven miles' encompassed by the
landscaping on La Canada and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard would cost approximately $57,652 per year to
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 4
maintain at the standard proposed by the ordinance. If this standard were to be applied to all the major streets in
the Town, some 36 miles, the cost per year would be approximately $241,396 per year, based upon 29 miles
without medians at a slightly lower cost. However, as discussed below, this not intended to be applied
throughout the Town. . .
Ordinance Approach , .,
The ordinance, as previously recommended to the Town Council, was not intended to be a beautification
ordinance. It is intended only to provide a means for the Town to accept landscape and/or lighting provided by
developers within public rights-of-way for the enhancement of their developments. If adopted, these proposed
amendments will implement regulations and specifications for landscape within the Town's rights-of-way by:
1. Establishing and implementing standards for landscape and lighting within the public rights-of-
way along arterial streets.
....• , .. ..-,.tl ... .. ♦ .. -....... . .- . ...... ....•....\w ire.-X......,..MM
2. Establishing a protocol for the Town to consider accepting the responsibility to maintain
elements in public rights-of-way if those elements meet the standards set forth by this ordinance.
If the requested area does not meet the standards, the applicant must bring the areas in question
to the standards or maintain those areas separately from the areas maintained by the Town.
The ordinance does not provide for shared, private party-Town, maintenance of landscape or lighting. This was
i conscious decision by the Staff following an explicit recommendation of the TAC. To this end the ordinance
is set upfor fullprivate partyor Town maintenance, with~the-O `tion fog the Town to accept any portion of the
p
landscape or lighting that meets the standards.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Planningand Zoning Commission conducted apublic on January7, 1997, regarding the proposed
g
amendments to the Oro Valley g Zonin Code Revised, relating to landscaping services and lighting in roadways
andublic rights-of-way. At that meeting, Bryant Nodine advised the Commission that the consensus of staff,
pg ,.,
and the Technical AdvisoryCommittee for this project was that-the Town should be very 'cautious about
accepting privately funded landscape in rights-of-way. The Committee, as well as staff's research, indicated that
most other jurisdictions have determined that this' practice is too costly'to provide significant benefits to the
Town.
The Commission moved, secondedy,
, Davis) and carried b' a 7-0 vote to recommend denial of the
(Moody
amended text for Chapter 14, Article 14-3, Roadway Median and Right-of-Way Landscape Maintenance and
Lighting Requirements, and asked the Council to reconsider the polices previously adopted as a part of this
issue. The basis of their decision was the anticipated cost to the Town.'
TOWN COUNCIL STUDY SESSION - + I ``'
The Oro ValleyTown Council held a Study 'Session on';this 'item 'on. Monday, November 2 1998. Staff
presented the Council with background regarding the work of the Technical Advisory Committee'and the draft
'rdinance. Representatives from several property management companies and homeowners associations were
present and provided input about the issue. Council directed staff to convene another meeting of the Technical
Advisory Committee and to bring the item forward for consideratibri at the December 2, 1998 Town Council
meeting. This item was continued at the December 2nd Town Council meeting.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
"OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 4
The proposed ordinance, and the process in which it was drafted, do address the concerns raised by Council at
the November 2nd,1998 study session. Xeriscape landscaping is strongly encouraged by the ordinance; moreover
the proposed standards require drought-tolerant landscaping. The proposed standards provide for an easy
method for HOAs to request the Town to accept drought-tolerant landscaping, or to separate out and continue to
maintain those areas that are not drought-tolerant. Thus HOA can `downscope' their landscaping and turn it
over to the Town. An additional concern raised by members of the Council at the study session questioned
whether HOAs have been involved in the process of drafting the proposed code amendment. HOAs were
consulted during the process of developing the proposed standards, and draft versions of the amendment were
sent out for comment to several HOAs.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING:
The TAC met on December 1St, 1998 to discuss the November 2nd Town Council study session and any issues that
may have been brought up. The Committee restated their concerns that the Town should be very cautious about
accepting privately funded landscaping in the right-of-way, and again indicated that most other jurisdictions have
determined that this practice is too costly and cumbersome to provide significant benefits to the Town. The
members of the TAC also stated that ADOT, Pima County, and the City of Tucson are re-examining this issue in
terms of liability regarding vehicular safety.
In terms of simplifying the process for revising landscape plans, the Committee felt that existing policies should be
ollowed, as not to create a `double standard'. Thus, substantial changes to landscape plans would require DRB and
Council review, whereas minor, `common sense' changes could be approved administratively by the Planning &
Zoning Administrator. The members of the TAC stated they felt that they had addressed all issues as it relates to
the ordinance, and requested that the Council provide specific direction if it is the wish of the Council to return the
Ordinance to the TAC for further review.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the recommendations of denial by the Planning & Zoning Commission and Technical Advisory
Commission, based on the anticipated costs to the Town. Staff recommends denial of this item.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS
I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)9848 , adopting amendments to Chapter 14, Adding a New Article 14-3,
Roadway Median and Right-Of-Way Landscape Maintenance and Lighting requirements, as presented.
OR
I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)98- 48 , adopting amendments to Chapter 14, Adding a New Article 14-3,
Roadway Median and Right-Of-Way Landscape Maintenance and Lighting requirements, with the following
amendments: .
OR
T move to deny Ordinance No. (0)9848 , adopting amendment to Chapter 14, Adding a New Article 14-3,
Aoadway Median and Right-Of-Way Landscape Maintenance and Lighting requirements, finding that:
OR
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY .
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 4
I move to continue this item to the January 6, 1999 Town Council Hearing. -�a_ '7—'
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance No. (0)98-48 .
2. New Article 14-3.
3. Flow Diagram of the Process for Town Acceptance of Landscape in the Right-of-Way
/
id( ,
,. -0 )
. 1 in4 d Zoning Administrator
------.. -- ---- j; • 1 , . . . ; -, -1.;_ I.al,
Co a unity De 110. if:nt Vi irector
/ i
di.A..,,A..e... ` 4
„ ' Town Manag•
F:\ZONECODE\ZCR\ROW LAND\ROWLPTC.RPT
ORDINANCE NO. (0)98- 48
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO
AMENDMENTS OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 14,
ADDING A NEW ARTICLE 14-3, ROADWAY MEDIAN AND RIGHT-OF-WAY
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AND LIGHTING REGULATIONS; ESTABLISHING
THESE AMENDMENTS AS PART OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING
CODE REVISED, AND FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; PRESERVING
RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ASSURED AND
PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER PROVIDING
PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY:
SECTION 1. That certain document known as "Amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning
Code Revised, Chapter 14, Adding a New Article 14-3, Roadway Median and Right-Of-
Way Landscape Maintenance and Lighting Regulations, three copies of which are on file in
the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, which document was
made a public record by Resolution No. (R)98- 48 is hereby referred to, adopted and made
apart hereof as if fullyset out in this ordinance, any provisions thereof to become effective
p
thirty days after the adoption of this ordinance by the Town Council.
SECTION 2. All ordinances and part of ordinances in conflict with provisions of this
ordinance or any part of the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised adopted
herein by reference are hereby repealed on the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 3. Repeal of all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the
provisions set forth herein or any part of the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code
Revised adopted herein by reference does not affect rights and duties that have matured or
penalties that were incurred and proceedings that were begun before the effective date
of the repeal.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the
ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona
this 16 thday of December , 1998.
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney
F:\ZONECODE\ZCR\ROW LAND\ORDROW.TCC
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED
CHAPTER 14, ADDING A NEW ARTICLE 14-3, ROADWAY MEDIAN AND RIGHT-
OF-WAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AND LIGHTING REGULATIONS
Article 14-3. ROADWAY MEDIAN AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE AND LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS
Section 14-301 Purpose
The Town's preference is to maintain naturally occurring vegetation within the roadways and
the public right-of-way areas in the Town of Oro Valley. However, from time to time, the
Town extends the privilege of private installation of landscape materials within these areas.
The purpose of this ordinance is to establish the methods for the-ftequisitien transfer of the
responsibility for privately-installed landscape - ' • '- -- : : -: -- =• = • *:-
-: '- -- : - : : : - from a private party to the Town. Currently this
e • . It also provides the designation
of responsibility for lighting in roadways and the public right-of-way areas.
Section 14-302 Applicability
This ordinance denotes the methods of implementation for landscaping both existing and future
roadways. The methods are: 1) the Town of Oro.Valley exclusive maintenance, or 2) the
AssociationPri vate party's exclusive maintenance in specified areas.-as
: -: '- -- - . : --' : : -. - - ---. In addition, this ordinance specifies the standards
for the acceptance of maintenance of roadway lighting by the Town of Oro Valley.
Section 14-303 Town of Oro Valley Maintenance of Landscape
A. Acceptance Standards
The Town of Oro Valley may he willing to accept responsibility for the maintenance,of
drought tolerant native landscaping within the public rights-of-way of arterial streets. 4s
to the level specified in Section 14 305. A listing of all arterial streets can be found on the
Town's Functional Classification Map for Streets and Routes. Before the Town assumes any
responsibility, the following stipulations must be met:
1. The landscape must meet the standards, contained in Section 14-305 of this ordinance.
2. An inspection per Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR), Section 14-2108 will be
performed to check compliance.
3. The initial application towards the acceptance of.new or future roadway landscape will
occur only after 50% of the building permits. in the subdivision or properties adjacent
to roadway in a development area (in the case of a PAD). are issued.
4. - - -• -_ •. •. • •- ; - ..... 2• : ......
.. •7 • • • . _
- The parry
and backflow preventers in the arcs accepted p .
P
wishing
to transfer maintenance to the Town will provide: 1) as-bunts, and 2) laminated
.0 menu's in all clocks with three (3) copies of the menus to the Town. The Town will
provide water for maintainingexisting
the vegetation once accepted.
B. Transition Plan for the Town
Acceptance of Landscape Maintenance Responsibility.
standards in Section 14-305 of this ordinance, the party
If the landscape does not meet the the
wishing to transfer maintenance
to the Town will develop a transition plan to bring
landscape to standards. During the transition period:
• landscaped medians and right-of-way areas will be
1. Existing privately installed sari p q
renovated to meet the
requirements of Article 14-2 and Section 14-305
with the more
ordinance prevailingwhere there are conflicts:
restrictive standards of this
modifications or repairs during the transition will be
a. Any costs incurred for P
. � In arty.
borne bythe liable Homeowners' Associate transfers
-: . If a particular
HOA private party requests that a turf remain, the maintenance costs will be the
• ' ' •vate party. Installation of a private ROA private,
responsibility of the �01� p� P
party,water meter is required for those areas.
• • • landscaped privately-installed
2. Before the Town officially assumes responsibility, the
to this ordinance. and the-Code of Oro
areas will be inspected by the Town pursuantTown
A written evaluation will be provided by the
Valley, �rt�cle 7 5 l.. and 7 5 13. fen-in
• - --_- .-- ' . :• : :• trans q
as a guide for any necessary repairs. Once the - -
' will reinspect the area for compliance to this
party has completed the repairs, the Town P .
Town will assume responsibility for maintaining the
ordinance. When compliant, the P
landscape.
. • •_ • . .•.• •. . Private Party Maintenance of 1
Section 14-30' • : : . : - : •- • ' .
Landscaping
' •
The Town of Oro Valley will continue to permit •-:• :•: :---: -- -
• maintain
:. •-- - : : -- :- - ::•-- - private pares to develop and landscape in the
medians and rights-of-way adjacent to the roadways.
•
A. The privately installed landscape must meet the requirements of the OVZCR, Article
14-2, and Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards, Section 6-11. Periodic
on-site inspections will be performedby the Zoning Inspector to determine that:
in a weed free, trash The landscaped areas are being maintained free condition.
Maintenance also consists of regular watering, pruning and fertilizing.
includingsalvaged plants which do not survive, are
,m;... 2. Any dead plant materials,
m,,,,. replaced within 45 days.
3. Replacement plants are of a similar size and quality.
4. Native plant materials are maintained in their natural form. Proper pruning and
forpublic visibility, safety and the healthy preservation of the
trimming plantsY
plants is being performed as per American National Standards Institute (ANSI
A300) "Tree, Shrub
and Other WoodyPlant Maintenance Standard Practices."
The Town maytrim and clear all excessive growth, if applicable, per the Code
of the Town of Oro Valley, Sections 7-5-12 and 7-5-13.
B. Privately maintainedlandscaperight-of-way in the ri ht-of-way requires a licensing agreement from
per the Code of Oro Valley, Article 7-5-12 and 7-5-13, and
the engineering department
Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards, Section 6-11.
• is required. This will prevent
C. The installation of hard-line piping (PVC) in the medians q
replacement of the piping. Irrigation systems must be operational to
frequent and costly p P P
prevent loss of vegetation and expensive water leaks. The HOA permittee is
responsible both for systems checkingthe s stems for damage and replacing any defective
piping or heads.
D. Exception existing privately-installed median and right-of-way landscape areas built
prior to the adoption of this ordinance shall be exempt from preceding requirement for
hard-line piping.
Section 14-305
Roadway Median and Right-of-Way Landscaping Standards
vegetation enhances roe values, improves the quality of life,
The native Sonoran Desert property rtY
and is a unique part of the Town's character. In recognition of this, the following landscape
Q roadwayright-of-way
standards apply to all privately-installed landscaping within medians and
PP
areas within the Town of Oro Valley:
A. The use of native, drought tolerant vegetation in the roadway medians and rights-of-
way is required. Landscape shall include a selection of trees, shrubs, succulents, cacti
q . p
'-�•� minimal water.
and ground covers which enhance the scenery but consume
medians and rights-of-way B. Tree species planted in the must conform to Addendum A of
the Oro Valley approvedplant lant list. When choosing native tree species the following
considerations are essential: 1) they are adapted to the desert climate, 2) they are
consistent with the existingtown landscape, and 3) their size, shape and location are
appropriate.
trees shall be planted e•� an average ranging from no more than one per 25 50
C. Canopy
40 linear rightway
feet of median or ofarea unless otherwise approved by the Town.
Median rights-of-way and rights-of- areas will be calculated independent of each other; extending
from property boundary to property boundary. For example: A .5 mile (2,640 feet)
and right-of-way area could have no more than 66 trees in the
mediansingle-sidev
median and 66 in the r-o-w side area for a total of 132 trees. Grouping of trees may be
used to enhance visual attractiveness.
D. Shrubs shall be planted at approximately one per 100 square feet in the median unless
otherwise approved by
the Town. All shrubs, accents and ground covers must conform
to the approved list in OVZCR, Article 14-2, Addendum A.
used in curbed medians. The use of hydroseed in the remainder
E. Hydroseed is not to be
of wa ri hts-of- to replace groundcover is acceptable provided:
rights-of-way
approved revegetation seed mix list,
listed on the Oro Valley
1. The seed is
Addendum B.
isirrigated after plantinguntil the plants are established. Hard-line
2. The seedg
irrigation is not required for this purpose.
tin areas are regularly weeded to maintain the aesthetics of the
3. The planting gu Y
landscape.
be located withinpublic rights-of-way upon the approval of the
F. Earthen berms may g
Town Engineer.
G. The use of rock materials which are compatible with the Town landscape will be used
for reducing soil erosion and dust control.
d shall be utilized in the roadway medians and rights-of-
H. Appropriate irrigation metho s
way:
irrigation The installation of
water conservingirri ation systems will require hard-line
(PVCI pipes for durability and increased longevity.
'i
2. Separate Tewn automatic water meters and backflow preventers will be installed
for areas to be maintained by the Town.
yes will be installed ata ro
3. Isolation valPPriate locations on water lines for P
emergency shutoff.
4. The use of effluent water, when available, is required.
• inspections of irrigation systems to check for proper delivery of water
5, Periodic g Y
flow, operation of the system. location of water leaks, and unhealthy plant
condition is required.
S ecti o n 14-306 b Review Process for Town Acceptance of Landscape Maintenance,
accepts responsibility for a specific roadway median or right-
of-wayBefore the Town of Oro Valley p p ty P .
' will complete this review
area, each :---: -- ' . : *: •:- private party applicant P
process:
A. The :---: •-- ' . :-•: - applicant will schedule a pre-submittal conference with 1
Department PlaPlanningtung
and ZoningDe artment and the Public Works Department to review the
%.. landscape plan for the roadway median and right-of-way landscape. Review of
ider project safety, future expansion of the roadway and
landscape proposals will cons
access, drainage infrastructure, pedestrian concerns, adjoining land uses, and
other criteria on a case by case basis.
B. Rome
owner's Association) The applicant must file landscape plans with the Planning
approval 30 days prior to the next regular meeting of the
and Zoning Department for
These landscape plans will be accompanied by the
Developmental Review Board p w he
the fee schedule. Landscape pans must comply ith t
appropriate fee according to lof Oro
Section 14-305. The approval procedure listed in theTownValley
provisions of pp within the right-
of-way,
i ht-
Section 14-209 will then be followed. To workg
Zoning Code Revised, per the Code of
-wa the applicant will be required to secure a right-of-way permit . . •
of y,
7-5-13, and the Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street
Oro Valley, Article 7-5-12 and
Standards, Section 6-11.
Section 14-307 Lighting
The Pliblie Wofks Depef
El-Refit retains the respee.sibility f r r • g nd the requirements for
accepting the roadway median and right of way lighting� providingstreet li htinQ at selected points (primarily
The Town of Oro Valley is committed to tL
• of its citizens. In ke-.m e-with General s' icy.
ma or intersections to ensure the safety ever. the
tfite
• • streets) is not encouraged within the Town. How
street lighting fully lit lighting. This
of installation and maintenance of such 1
Town may extend the privilege private nsibility for
Section provides a
mechanism for the Town to consider accepnc
tae of the respo
maintenance of street lighting.
8Section 14-308 Installation and Maintenance of Lighting
This ordinance specifically
excludes the Town from accepting maintenance of monument
lighting orlighting the ancillary li htin for the beautification of sub-divisions.
A. New Street Lights
• in the vicinity of abuttin• in the vicini of major
1• A..licants for new .ro ects at the
should be responsible for the installation of street lig_ht(s)
intersections P
intersections.. The Town Engineer shall determine which corner(s) street light(s) willwill work with TEP and the Department of Public Works
be accepted. The applicant it
and the Towns street light maintenance contractor to install suitable street lights (pole
and fixture) in
the Town's right-of-way. The applicant is responsible for any costs,
.ole/fixture installation and electrical hooka•. The Town may
associated with the
then elect to assume operationlig and maintenance responsibilities for the ht(s).
Associations, Businesses and others may
2. Developers, Homeowner desire to install new.
privately
with
owned, operated, and maintained street lights at locations not associa ,
P
a ma or intersection. Should the •ro•osed location of the street li•ht be in the Town's
will be
right-of--way: a licensing agreementrequired. The applicant will be responsible
for maintenance of the light. : •- - - •- = - '- '"" -
The a••ll•cant shall be res•onslble for the all u•-front and ongoing costs associated with
would include but are not limited to installation, operation
the street light. These costs _
and maintenance of the street light. - === • = " • ="
of the 1}�ht. The a.•llcant
will also be res•onsible for com.lvin• with all •rovisions of
._t. the licensing agreement.
B. Existing Street Lights
The Town may accept responsibility operation for the o eration and maintenance of certain
privately
owned and/or maintained street lights. - = - • =_:• - =
existing
-• •- - The street li•hts to be accepted by the
Town shall be located at major intersections either within the Town right-of-way or
1
• legallyand easily accessible by the Town and maintenance
within an easement
equipment. The party wishing to transfer /ownership/maintenance
personnel and
• ' shall, at their expense, -� modify and retrofit the street
responsibility to the TownP
light as needed to satisfy any criteria for operation and maintenance of the street light.
nce contractor are satisfied with the street light and
When the Town and the maintenance
willing to operate and maintain
• it, the Town will accept the
for the
operation and maintenance of the street light.
Section 14-309 Lighting Standards
All roadway exterior lighting shall conform to the Code of Oro Valley, Article 6-7 and
Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Section 13-105.
dt. '
Section 14-310 Process for Town Acceptance of Lighting Maintenance
responsibility for a specific lighting in the right-of-way
Before the Town of Oro Valley accepts resp _ P
area, applicant a licant will complete this review process:
conference with the Planning_and Zoning
A. The applicant will schedule a pre-submittalthe
Works Department to review the lighting plan for
Department and the Public consider
• -of-way li•hts. Review of li•htin• .ro.osals will
roadway median and rl•ht inin• land
proiect safety, future expansion of the roadway and other infrastructure. ad o
uses. and other criteria on a case-by-case basis.
with the Public Works Department
B. The applicant must file lighting plans for approval.m accompanied by theappropriate fee according to the fee
These lighting clans will be acco p
schedule.
ROADWAY
MEDIAN AND R-O-W LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ORDINANCE
Process for Town Acceptance of Landscape in the R-O-W
} resubmittals must be received
(Pre-submittal Conference
wl P&Z and DPW J at least 15 days
before the scheduled
I / ORB or Council meeting
Submit Application
w/ Plans and Fee
1 . .
within 10 days incomplete — resubmit
after submittal
(Application Certified)— p
I
complete
I
Staff/Agency Review incomplete — resubmit
I
complete
1
meets acceptance
standards(14-303)
--1--- \
Transition Plan
yes no 1 (14-3038)
1
f*
Private Party
at least 30 days after Continues to Maintain
certified complete (all or portion per 14-30481 b)
1
Development Review Board) . incomplete -- resubmit
I ,
recommendation
1 ,
10 or more days
Town Council incomplete resubmit
after ORB
1 ,......1
application application
approved denied
Town inspects
I ,
Town evaluation of necessary repairs
1 ,
private party completes repairs
I
Town reinspects not compliant
I
compliant
Town Accepts Landscape )
f:\data\wp\zcri141row_flow.doc
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 9
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
' OM: Werner S. Wolff, Chief of Police
.UBJECT: Additional Personnel&Equipment
MARY:
As of July, 1998 the ratio of officers per one thousand
The population of the Town of Oro Valley is ever increasing. y �.. The Police
December that figure population was at 2.08, as of1, has dropped to approximately 2.04 or low
ratio of 2.20 officers per one thousand population if possible. To
Department would like to try to maintain at least a
�
help do this we would have to add sworn police personnel.
the U.S. Department of Justice COPS grant award (COPS
The impact of hiring the officers can be softened by utilizing � . ation of this
Thegrant award was for a three year period only and the clock on the expo'
Universal II awarded 6/97). leave the officer to population ratio at
grant is ticking.
The three remaining positions from this grant would still
have another U.S.Department of Justice COPS grant award for an
app
roximately 2.15. The Police Department does d like to utilize these
COPS Universal III awarded 4/98. The Police Department woul
additional two officers under
Governor's Office of Community&Highway Safety grant that
officers for a new Traffic Unit in conjunction with a at a future
was awarded for$26,000 for two newmotorcycles. The Police Department will becoming to the Council
date to request these two remaining positions.
Also needed would be equip funds to a ui the officers(weapons,radios,ballistic vests,etc.).
FISCAL IMPACT: FY 98/99$6,000
All salaryand benefits are approximate for three Officers.
`98/99 Salary/Benefits(i/Z yr) $64,500
Officer Equipment 6,000
Available COPS funding <48,375>
Salary savings s in vacancies from 7/98 to present < 16,125>
Fiscal 98/99 Impact to Town $ 6,000
RECOMMENDATIONS:
f the three additional officers and to authorize funds for equipment
I recommend that Mayor&Council allow the hiring o
for the officers.
ATTACHMENTS: 1.)Officer to Population Chart
1
W- -- - .Wolff, Chief of P slice
,iiaaira21. I1
1 ' ' 4 1
Charles F. Sweet, iwn Manager
ORO VALLEY POLICE OFFICER
TO
POPULATION
RATIO
FISCAL YEAR TOWN
NUMBER NUMBER RATIO OF
Beginning of of of OFFICERS TO
JULY 1 ORO VALLEY SWORN CIVILIAN POPULATION
POPULATION OFFICERS PERSONNEL
91 - 92 7,745
28 10.5 3.62
92 - 93 9,024
28 11.0 3.10
93 - 94 10,335
30 12.0 2.90
94 - 95 11,947
33 14.75 2.76
95 - 96 19,657
43 19.25 2.19
96 - 97 21,407
47 21.25 2.20
97 - 98 22,834
47 21.25 2.06
98 - 99 25,455
53 22.25 2.08
98 _ 99 appx 26,000
53 22.25 2.04
as of 12/1/98 ,
98 _ 99 appx 26,000
56 22.25 2.15
w/ addition of 3
officers from the
COPS U-II Grant
a x 26 000 58 22.25
2.23
98 - 99 pp
w/ addition of 2
officers from the
COPS U-III Grant
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
to
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL
FROM: Don Chatfield, Community Development Director
Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney
• RESOLUTION No. (0)98-103 DECLARING AS PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN
SUBJECT.
DOCUMENT KNOWN S "AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE,
SECTION 6-8-7, AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE"
SUMMARY:
If the Council elects to adopt the document known as "Amendments to the Oro Valley Town Code, Section 6-8-
7, Amendments to the 1997 Uniform Fire Code", for the subject amendment by ordinance, action must be taken,
p
in the
form of adoption of the attached resolution, to make said amendments a matter of public record.
RECOMMENDATION:
Safety Staff recommends Council adoption of the resolution. As such, approval of this resolution will
Building Saf y p
make
"Amendments to the Oro ValleyTown Code, Section 6-8-7, Amendments to the 1997 Uniform Fire
Code" a public record.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
approve Resolution No. (R)98- 103 making the document known as "Amendments to the Oro
I move to pp
ValleyTown Code, Section 6-8-7, Amendments to the 1997 Uniform Fire Code", a public record.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. (R)98-_103
--1- 3L__1
afety Administrator
1
i _ • 0 I. a ,moony •
Community D lopm- - Dire, tor
/ ______)
-, 4
.I, .. .d
own Manager
<..cAbSs2R�`9b?3ithfid3? ki:iti��>n 3a�"`�ii.3�M`..?Tdk23,.2kL.�} '<i3d�d?�?2?? ..PlIgg
RESOLUTION NO. (R) 98-103
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN
DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK AND ENTITLED
AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE - 1997 EDITION; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY, ARIZONA:
That certain document known as the Amendments to the Uniform Fire Code -
1997 edition, is hereby declared to be a public record and three copies are to
remain on file with the office of the Town Clerk; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the citizens of the Town of Oro Valley
and\or necessary for the preservation of peace, health and safety of the Town of
Oro Valley, Arizona, an emergency is declared to exist, and this resolution shall be
effective immediately upon its passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 16 day of DECEMBER , 1998.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney
,;,,,..,_,
•
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COU
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: Don Chatfield, Community Development Director
Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. (0)9852 AMENDING THE ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE, SECTION
6-8-7, ADOPTION OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
BACKGROUND:
Fire AdvisoryCommittee, upon the recommendation of Emergency Services Consulting Group, has
The p
recommended that the Town of Oro Valley adopt the 1997 Uniform Fire Code (UFC). The Council, in its
action of September 2, 1998, directed staff to move toward adoption of the 1997 UFC.
a
Uniform Codes are rarelyadopted immediately after their issuance. In most cases, local adoption is delayed by
p
one to three years to allow local amendments to be prepared.
Staff proceeded to submit on October 7, 1998, the 1997 UFC for adoption with Golder Ranch Fire District's
,m
endments. The Council, in its action of October 7, 1998, adopted the 1997 UFC. Direction was given to
and both fireproviders byMayor and Council to modify the amendments to meet the Town of Oro
staff y
Valley's needs. Staff contacted both the Golder Ranch Fire District and Rural/Metro to review the amendments
to the Town's UFC 1997 Fire Code.
Representatives from both fireproviders met several times to review the amendments for the Town of Oro
Valley. On November 23, 1998 staff, Golder Ranch Fire District and Rural Metro met finalizing the
amendments. Both fire providers and staff feel the amendments cover all types of constructions and fire related
the issues concerning the Town of Oro Valley.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council amend the Oro Valley Town Code to adopt local amendments for the 1997
Uniform Fire Code.
C:\Council\UFC97 Amendment Staff Report.doc
F_____
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to ADOPT Ordinance No. (0)98- S2 amending the Oro Valley Town Code, Section 6-8-7 by
adopting the local amendments to the 1997 Uniform Fire Code, as presented by staff.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance No. (0)98-
2.
Exhibit "A" (1997 UFC AMENDMENTS)
----1/ L—
wilding fety Administrator
-lia
Community Duni ment Direct•
/ / i.xleiel----------
own Manage
FNERPIYIsb:v-GAIP 'v SP1
ORDINANCE NO. (0) 98- 52
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 6-8-7
OF THE TOWN CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,
INCORPORATING SUCH BY REFERENCE, ADOPTING
THE AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 UNIFORM FIRE
CODE
WHEREAS, the problem of fires causes extreme duress to the citizens of the Town of
Oro Valley; and
WHEREAS, the Town has the duty under state law to protect the public's health,
safety and welfare;
NOW THEREFORE, The Mayor and the Council of the Town of Oro Valley hereby
ordain as follows:
Section 1 - That certain document known as "The Amendments to 1997 Uniform Fire
Code" (attached as Exhibit "A"), three copies of which are on file with the Town Clerk
of Oro Valley and which was made a public document under Resolution number ( R)
98-103 , is hereby adopted and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this ordinance.
Section 2 - Any person found guiltyof violating any Pprovision of the Ordinance shall
be guilty of a class one misdemeanor, unless otherwise set forth.
Section 3 - Any and all ordinances, provisions of the Town Code, or otherwise in
conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 4 - If any subsection, section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to
be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Passed and adopted by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley this 16
day of December, 1998.
Mayor Paul H. Loomis
ATTEST:
Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney
TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY
1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
AMENDMENTS
November 15, 1998
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RESOLUTION AND SECTION 1-8 2
ARTICLE 1 - ADMINISTRATION 4
ARTICLE 2 - DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 6
ARTICLE 9 - FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND WATER SUPPLY 7
ARTICLE 10 - FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT 8
ARTICLE 11 - GENERAL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS...................................... 11
ARTICLE 12 - MAINTENANCE OF EXITS AND EMERGENCY ESCAPES 11
ARTICLE 25 - PLACES OF ASSEMBLY 12
ARTICLE 32 - TENTS, CANOPIES AND TEMPORARY MEMBRANE
STRUCTURES 13
ARTICLE 45 - APPLICATION OF FLAMMABLE FINISHES........................ 13
ARTICLE 47 - FUMIGATION AND THERMAL INSECTICIDAL FOGGING14
ARTICLE 77 - EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS.-................................................. 14
ARTICLE 82 - LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GASES 14
ARTICLE 90 - STANDARDS 15
APPENDIX I-A- LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING
BUILDINGS 17
APPENDIX III-C - INSPECTION, TESTING,AND RECORD KEEPING
REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS..... 19
SECTION 9 - APPEALS, SECTION 10 - PENALTIES 26
1
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE PRESCRIBING REGULATIONS
GOVERNING CONDITIONS HAZARDOUS TO LIFE AND PROPERTY FROM FIRE OR
EXPLOSION, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR HAZARDOUS USES OR
OPERATIONS, AND ESTABLISHING A BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION AND PROVIDING
OFFICERS THEREFORE AND DEFINING THEIR POWERS AND DUTIES.
SECTION 1. ADOPTION OF THE FIRE CODE
For the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire
and explosion, the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY hereby adopts the entire FIRE CODE KNOWN AS
THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE 1997 EDITION, including appendices, with exceptions and revisions
as noted, including all revisions included in the 1998 supplement and the UNIFORM FIRE CODE
STANDARDS 1997 EDITION as published by the INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE INSTITUTE
AND THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS except such portions as
are deleted, modified, or amended by Section 8 of this resolution. Copies of this code are now on file
in the office of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, 11000 NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO
VALLEY,ARIZONA and shall be available to all interested parties during normal business hours. The
provision of the CODE shall be controlling within the boundaries of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
as those boundaries may be modified from time to time.
SECTION 2. ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES OF A BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
A. The UNIFORM FIRE CODE shall be enforced by the bureau of fire prevention in the fire
department of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY or their designee which is hereby established.
B. The Fire Marshal of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY shall be appointed and/or approved by the
Mayor and Council of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY and shall be responsible for the operation and
management of the Bureau of Fire Prevention.
C. The Fire Marshal may designate such members of his or her staff, from time to time, to act as
inspectors and aid in the enforcement of the UNIFORM FIRE CODE as long as such inspectors meet
the qualifications set forth by the Fire Marshal of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY.
SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS
A. Wherever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the UNIFORM FIRE CODE it shall refer to the area
within the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY.
B. Wherever the words "Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention" are used they shall be held to mean
"Fire Marshal".
SECTION 4. ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITS OF THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE STORAGE OF
2
FLAMMABLE OR COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS IN OUTSIDE, ABOVEGROUND TANKS IS
PROHIBITED.
The storage of flammable or combustible liquids in outside aboveground tanks is prohibited within the
boundaries of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY.
EXCEPTION: The storage of flammable or combustible liquids in outside aboveground tanks
may be permitted by obtaining a variance from the appropriate Fire District Fire Marshal and
the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Fire Marshal, and the State Fire Marshal. Pima County or
Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commissions may have additional requirements.
SECTION 5. ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITS IN WHICH STORAGE OF LIQUEFIED
PETROLEUM GASES IS TO BE RESTRICTED.
The limits referred to in Section 8204.2 of the tTNIFORM FIRE CODE, in which storage of liquefied
petroleum gas is restricted, are hereby established as being within the boundaries of the TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY.
SECTION 6. ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITS OF THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE STORAGE OF
EXPLOSIVES AND BLASTING AGENTS IS TO BE PROHIBITED.
The storage of explosive and blasting agents is prohibited within the boundaries of the TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY.
EXCEPTION: The storage of explosives and/or blasting agents may be permitted with the
approval of the Fire Marshal, after consideration of any special features such as topographical
conditions,nature of occupancy and proximity to buildings,and degree of private fire protection
and securing to be provided.
SECTION 7. ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITS IN WHICH THE STORAGE OF COMPRESSED
NATURAL GAS IS TO BE RESTRICTED.
The limits referred to in Section 5204.5.2 of the UNIFORM FIRE CODE, in which storage of
compressed natural gas is restricted, are hereby established as being within the boundaries of the
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY.
SECTION 8 - AMENDMENTS MADE IN THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE
The UNIFORM FIRE CODE is amended, revised, modified and/or changed in the following respects:
ARTICLE 1 - ADMINISTRATION
Section 101.6 Conflicting Provisions. is modified to read:
3
"Where there is a conflict in this code between a general requirement and a specific
requirement, or between this code and any other statute or ordinance,the more restrictive shall
apply."
Section 101.8 References to Appendix. a second sentence has been added to read:
"The following appendix chapters have been specifically adopted:
Appendix 1-A - Life Safety Requirements for Existing Buildings Other than High Rise
{as amended}
Appendix 1-C - Stairway Identification
Appendix II-A - Suppression and Control of Hazardous Fire Areas
Appendix II-B - Protection of Flammable and Combustible Liquid Tanks in Locations
Subject to Flooding
Appendix II-D - Rifle Ranges
Appendix II-E - Hazardous materials management and Hazardous materials inventory
statements
Appendix II-F - Protected Aboveground Tanks for Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing
Stations Outside Buildings
Appendix II-G - Secondary Containment for Underground Tank Systems Containing
Flammable or Combustible Liquids
Appendix II-H - Site Assessments for Determining Potential Fire and Explosion Risks
from Underground Flammable or Combustible Liquid Tank Leaks
Appendix II-I - Ozone Gas-Generating Equipment
Appendix II-J - Storage of Flammable and Combustible Liquids in Tanks Location
within Below Grade Vaults
Appendix III-A - Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings
Appendix III-B - Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution
Appendix III-C - Inspection,Testing and Record Keeping Requirements for Fire Protection
Systems {as amended}
Appendix IV-A - Interior Floor Finish
Appendix IV-B - Christmas Trees
Appendix V-A - Nationally Recognized Standards of Good Practice
Appendix VI-C - Emergency Relief Venting for Fire Exposure for Aboveground Tanks
Appendix VI-E - Reference Tables From the Uniform Building Code
Appendix VI-F - Recommended Separation Distances for Explosive Materials
Appendix VI-G - Cryogenic Fluids Weight And Volume Equivalents
Appendix VI-I - Conversion Tables
4
Section 103.1.4 Appeals. Add a second paragraph to read as follows:
"Whenever a violation of this code has been determined and the applicant wishes to appeal the
decision of the staff because of code interpretation, or unreasonable hardship, an appeal may be
filed to the Fire Chief or an authorized representative, as follows:
1. The applicant shall file a written appeal on or before Friday of each week, not later than
4:30 p.m.
2. The appeal will be heard by the chief, or an authorized representative within 10 working days
of the receipt of the appeal.
3. The chief, or an authorized representative, may use a Hearing Committee consisting of
the Building Official or his representative and such staff as is deemed appropriate to
provide advice on a particular appeal.
4. Adequate information shall be provided by the applicant on the Petition of Appeal to
fully describe the condition(s) in question.
5. The applicant may, but is not required to, meet with the chief and the building official,
or a designated representative, to discuss the appeal.
6. If the appeal is denied, the applicant shall comply with the requirement(s) of the Fire
Code or file an appeal to the Board of Appeals."
Section 103.2.1.1 General. is modified by changing:
Department to District and Ordinances to Ordinances and/or Codes and Regulations.
Section 103.3.1.2 Right of entry. is modified by changing:
Inspection warrant to Administrative warrant.
Section 103.4.4 is modified by changing:
misdemeanor to civil infraction.
Section 105.1 Scope has been modified to read as follows:
"It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to use a building or premises or engage
in any activity for which a permit is determined by the chief to be required under this code
without first having obtained such permit through the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Building
Department. When required, permits shall be obtained from the authority having jurisdiction."
5
ARTICLE 2 - DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Section 216-0
Add: Group R Division 4 Occupancy. Residential Group care facilities for ambulatory, non-
restrained persons who may have a mental or physical impairment and where personal care
services are provided to the clients (each accommodating more than 5 and not more than 16
clients or residents, excluding staff).
Section 219-R
Railway. is modified to read: Railway is a steam, electric or other railroad which carries
passengers or freight for hire.
Section 220 -S
Add: Special Operative Doors. Special Operative doors shall include, but are not limited to
electrically operated, pneumatically operated and other automatically operated doors.
Section 222-U
Add: Unlawful . Unless otherwise specifically provided, means a civil infraction.
6
ARTICLE 9 -FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND
WATER SUPPLY
901.2.2.3 is added to read as follows: Access control devices. Prior to the installation or modification
of access control devices,plans and specifications shall be submitted to the chief and the TOWN
OF ORO VALLEY Building Division for review and approval prior to construction.
Section 901.4.4 Premises identification. is modified to read as follows:
Approved premises identification shall be in accordance with Pima County Addressing Ordinance
Chapter 18.83 Section 18.83.010 thio 18.83.060.
Section 902.2.2.6. Grade. is modified to read as follows:
The gradient for a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed 15% maximum slope. ( 15 feet in
100 feet) (4572 mm in 30,480 mm).
Section 903.2 Required Water Supply for Fire Protection. add a second paragraph to read as
follows: The builder/developer as well as the property owner may request another alternative
method of supplying fire flow such as tanks, cisterns or sprinkler systems where the development
of full fire-flow is impractical. The builder/developer must obtain approval from the TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY Community Development Department for requirements for such devices. See
NFPA 1231 1993 Edition Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting.
Section 903.4.2 Required installations. is modified by adding to the end of the first sentence:
"or modified".
7
ARTICLE 10 - FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
AND EQUIPMENT
Section 1001.4 Approval and testing. the third paragraph is modified to read as follows:
Fire alarm and detection systems shall be tested in accordance with U.F.0 Standard 10-2 and
Appendix III-C.
Section 1001.7.1 General. add a second paragraph to read as follows:
Parking shall not be permitted within fifteen (15) feet of a fire hydrant except as otherwise
approved by the Chief.
Section 1001.7.1.1 is added as to read as follows: Obstruction at the time of emergency.
Obstruction of fire hydrants and fire equipment shall not occur at the time of an emergency.
Section 1001.10 Fire Appliances. is modified to read as follows:
The Chief is authorized to designate the type and number of fire appliances to be installed and
maintained in and upon all buildings and premises in the jurisdiction. This designation shall be
based on the relative severity of probable fire, including the rapidity with which it could spread.
Such appliances shall be of a type suitable for the probable class of fire associated with such
building or premises and shall have the approval of the chief.
Section 1003.2.2 Delete the first sentence and replace with: All Occupancies except Group U
Occupancies, an automatic sprinkler system shall be installed:
Delete the first sentence of paragraph 1 and replace with:
"1. In every story of all buildings when the floor area exceeds 1,500 square feet, (139.4m) and
in all basements regardless of size,when there is not provided at least 20 square feet(1.86 m) of
opening entirely above the adjoining ground level in each 50 linear foot(15,240 mm), or fraction
thereof, of exterior wall in the story or basement on at least one side of the building."
Delete paragraph 5 and replace with:
"5. Throughout all buildings more than two stories in height or with an occupied floor with an
occupant load of 30 or more that is located 55 feet or more above the lowest level of fire
department vehicle access.
EXCEPTION: Open parking garages."
Section 1003.2.3.9 is added to read as follows: Group A, Division 1 and 2 Occupancies.
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout Group A Division 1 and 2
occupancies.
Section 1003.2.3.10 is added to read as follows: Group A, Division 2.1,3,and 4 Occupancies. An
8
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout a building when a group A, Division 2.1,
3, or 4 occupancy is located above the first floor.
Section 1003.2.4.1 General. is deleted in its entirety and replaced to read as follows:
An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout all buildings containing a Group
E, Division 1, 2, or 3 occupancy.
EXCEPTION: One story buildings when each room used for instruction has at least one exit
door directly to the exterior at ground level, and when rooms used for assembly purposes have
at least one-half of the required exits directly to the exterior ground level, an automatic
sprinkler system need not be provided.
Section 1003.2.6.1 General. Is modified by changing the words:
"fire-extinguishing" to the words "fire sprinkler"
Section 1003.2.6.2 Group H, Division 4 Occupancies. Is modified by changing the words:
"fire-extinguishing" to the words "fire sprinkler"
Section 1003.2.6.3 Group H, Division 6 Occupancies. Is modified by changing the words:
"fire-extinguishing" to the words "fire sprinkler"
Section 1003.2.6.4 is added to read as follows: Group H, Division 5 Occupancies.
An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout Group H, Division 5
Occupancies having a single floor area greater than the following for specific types of
construction:
Type I F.R. - 30,000 sq. ft.
Type II F.R. - 20,000 sq. ft.
Type II-One-hour, Type III-One-hour and Type IV - 15,000 sq. ft.
Type II-N and III-N - 12,000 sq. ft.
Type V-One-hour - 8,000 sq. ft.
Type V-N - 5,000 sq. ft.
Aircraft repair hangers housing aircraft with a tail height exceeding 28 feet shall be provided with
an automatic sprinkler system throughout regardless of area or type of construction.
Section 1003.2.8 Group M Occupancies. The first sentence is deleted and replaced with:
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout Group M Occupancies where the
floor area, including mezzanines, exceeds 12,000 square feet (1114.8 m2) on any floor. (See
Section 1003.2.2 (5)).
Section 1003.2.9 Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. Is re-numbered to be Section 1003.2.9.1
Section 1003.2.9 is titled Group R Occupancies.
Section 1003.2.9.1 Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. Add an additional paragraph to read:
9
For the purpose of this subsection, area separation walls shall not define separate buildings. Any
habitable space below grade shall be considered a story. When the fire flow requirements of
Appendix III-A or the hydrant location and distribution requirements of Appendix III-B cannot
be met, an automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout the building. Residential
Sprinkler Systems shall be in accordance with Section 9002 Standard 10-3.
Section 1003.2.9.2 is added to read as follows: Group R, Division 3 Occupancies.
An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every Group R, Division 3
Occupancy constructed on property when:
1. Fire Flow for buildings as required in Appendix III-A cannot be met, or
2. Fire Hydrant Location and spacing requirements of Appendix III-B cannot be met, or
3. When Fire Department access roads with grades less than 15 percent are not provided, or
4. The distance between any portion of an exterior wall of the first story and an approved
hydrant is greater than required by the chief.
Residential or quick response sprinklers shall be used. The Sprinkler system may be connected
to the domestic water supply provided the required design density can be met. For the purpose
of this subsection, area separation walls shall not define separate buildings. Any habitable space
belowg rade shall be considered a story. Residential Sprinkler Systems shall be in accordance
with Section 9002 Standard 10-3.
Section 1003.2.10 is added to read as follows: Group S Occupancies.
Section 1003.2.10.1 is added to read as follows: Group S, Division 3 Occupancies.
An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout Group S, Division 3 Occupancies
two or more stories in height.
Section 1003.2.10.2 is added to read as follows: Group S, Division 5 Occupancies.
An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout Group S, Division 5 Occupancies
having a single floor area greater than the following for specific types of construction:
Type I F.R. - 30,000 sq. ft.
Type II F.R. - 20,000 sq. ft.
Type II-One-hour, Type III-One-hour and Type IV - 15,000 sq. ft.
Type II-N and III-N - 12,000 sq. ft.
Type V-One-hour - 8,000 sq. ft.
Type V-N - 5,000 sq. ft.
Aircraft repair hangers housing aircraft with a tail height exceeding 28 feet shall be provided with
an automatic sprinkler system throughout regardless of area or type of construction.
10
ARTICLE 11 - GENERAL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
Section 1105.7 is added to read as follows: Combustible Roof Surfaces.
Prior to application of roofing material involving the use of an open flame torch, a substrate or
roofing felt shall be mechanically attached to the roof,only substrate in accordance with A.S.T.M.
requirements shall be used. In addition, substrate materials shall not be applied by an open flame
torch or device. All combustible roof surfaces shall be protected by the substrate from the open
flame of the roofing torch.
Section 1105.8 is added to read as follows: Fire Watch.
A fire watch shall be maintained in the vicinity of the location where open-flame operations have
been conducted for not less than one-half hour after such operations have ceased
Section 1109.4.1 Designated Areas. is modified by adding the following:
Where smoking is permitted, there shall be provided on each table, and at other convenient
locations, approved non-combustible ashtrays or match receivers.
ARTICLE 12 - MAINTENANCE OF EXITS AND EMERGENCY
ESCAPES
Section 1207.3 is modified by adding a paragraph to Exception #1:
During the hours of occupancy by employees only, the building shall be provided with exits
complying with the Building Code.
Section 1207.3. is further modified by adding Exception #3 as follows:
3. Manually operated flush bolts are permitted on double entry/exit doors in Group A,
Division 3 and Group B, Occupancies when all the following conditions are met:
A. One of the two doors shall always be operable without special knowledge.
B. Only the active leaf shall be used to calculate the required exit width.
11
ARTICLE 25 - PLACES OF ASSEMBLY
Section 2505 Liquid-and gas-fueled Vehicles and Equipment
Section 2505.2.3.2. Quantity limit. Delete this section in its entirety.
Section 2505.2.3.4. Closure. DELETE the word"AND" and INSERT the word"Or".
Section 2506 is added to read as follows: AMUSEMENT BUILDINGS
2506.1. Scope. Amusement buildings used for a period of time not exceeding 45 days shall conform
with the requirements of the code for their occupancy classification in addition to the provisions
set forth in Articles 2, 9, 10 and 12.
EXCEPTION: Amusement buildings or portions thereof which are without walls or a
roof and constructed to prevent the accumulation of smoke in assembly areas.
2506.2 Amusement Structures.
2506.2.1 General. When mazes, mirrors or other effects are used to confound the egress path, exits
and exit signs shall be approved by the building official and where practicable, shall comply with
the requirements specified in Article 1212.7 of this code.
2506.2.2 Travel Distance. No portion of a maze may be further than 100 feet from an obvious exit out
of the maze.
2506.3 Operating at Reduced Lighting Levels
2506.3.1 General When such facilities operate at reduced lighting levels they shall adhere to the
following provisions:
1. GUIDES. Guides are required when haunted houses, fun houses and similar uses operate at
reduced lighting levels. The guide shall be responsible for complying with the following
provisions:
A. When people enter such an occupancy, they shall be organized into a group not to exceed
20 persons, and said group shall be accompanied by a guide who shall be familiar with the
facility.
B. The guide shall have an operable flashlight on his/her person at all times when
he/she is accompanying patrons.
C. The guide shall have direct communication with an attendant located at the switch
controlling the house lights.
2. LIGHTING ATTENDANT. There shall be an attendant who can immediately turn on the
12
ARTICLE 32 - TENTS, CANOPIES AND TEMPORARY
MEMBRANE STRUCTURES
Section 3202.2 Limited Application. The definition of CANOPY is modified to read as follows:
Canopy is a temporary structure, enclosure or shelter constructed of fabric or pliable material
supported by any manner except by air or the content it protects and is open on a minimum
of two sides.
ARTICLE 45 - APPLICATION OF FLAMMABLE FINISHES
Section 4502.6.3 Job Size. An exception has been added to read as follows:
EXCEPTION: In Group H, Division 4 Occupancies provided with an approved fire
sprinkler system throughout, the aggregate surface to be sprayed may include up to 40
percent of one vehicle.
Section 4502.8.1 General. Is modified by changing the words:
"fire-extinguishing" to the words "fire sprinkler"
Section 4504.6 Fire Protection. Is modified by changing the words:
"fire-extinguishing" to the words "fire sprinkler"
Section 4505.9.1 General. Is modified by changing the words:
"fire-extinguishing" to the words "fire sprinkler"
ARTICLE 47 - FUMIGATION AND THERMAL INSECTICIDAL
FOGGING
Section 4704 Notification of Fumigation has been modified by deleting the words "in writing".
14
ARTICLE 77 - EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS
Section 7702.2.1.1 Storage. Item 2 is modified to read as follows:
2. Commercially manufactured sporting black powder - 25 pounds (11.3 kg) in a separate,
portable Type 4 magazine, or 50 pounds (22.6 kg) in separate portable Type 4 magazines in
a completely sprinklered building. The quantity of product in a magazine shall not exceed 25
pounds (11.3 kg).
ARTICLE 82 - LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GASES
Section 8203.2.1.8 Use for Food Preparation. is deleted and replaced to read as follows:
Listed and approved LP-Gas commercial food service appliances shall be permitted to be used
inside restaurants and in attended commercial food catering operations provided that no
commercial food service appliances shall have more than two 10-oz non-refillable butane gas
containers having a maximum water capacity of 1.08 lb per container connected directly to the
appliance at any time and containers shall not be manifolded. The appliance fuel container(s)
shall be an integral part of the listed, approved commercial food service device and shall be
connected without the use of a rubber hose. Butane containers shall be listed. Storage in
restaurants and at food service locations of 10-oz butane non-refillable containers shall be limited
to no more than twenty-four containers.
15
ARTICLE 90 - STANDARDS
SECTION 9002 - UFC STANDARDS
ARTICLE 10
Add:
10-3; 1003.2.9.1 and 1003.2.9.2
Residential Fire Sprinkler Installation Standard
SECTION 9003 - RECOGNIZED STANDARDS
Add:
a.4.17 ASTM D 3574-86 Institutional Bedding Materials
n.2.9 12 Standard on Halon 1301 Fire Extinguishing Systems (1997 Edition)
n.2.10 13 Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems (1996 Edition)
n.2.11 13D Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family
Dwellings and Manufactured Homes (1996 Edition)
n.2.12 13R Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Residential Occupancies up
to and Including Four Stories in Height(1996 Edition)
n.2.13 14 Standard for the installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems (1996 Edition)
n.2.14 15 Standard for Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection(1996 Edition)
n.2.15 16 Standard for the Installation of Deluge Foam-Water Sprinkler and Foam Water
Spray Systems ( 1995 Edition)
n.2.16 17 Standard for Dry Chemical Extinguishing Systems (1998 Edition)
n.2.17 17A Standard for Wet Chemical Extinguishing Systems (1998 Edition)
n.2.18 20 Standard for the Installation of Centrifugal Fire Pumps (1996 Edition)
n.2.19 22 Standard For Water Tanks for Private Fire Protection(1996 Edition)
n.2.20 24 Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances
(1995 Edition)
n.2.21 25 Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire
Protection Systems (1998 Edition)
n.2.22 51B Standard for Fire Prevention in Use of Cutting and Welding Processes
(1994 Edition)
n.2.23 58 Liquified Petroleum Gas Code (1998 Edition)
n.2.24 70 National Electrical Code (1996 Edition)
n.2.25 72 National Fire Alarm Code (1996 Edition)
n.2.26 80 Standard for Fire Doors and Fire Windows (1995 Edition)
n.2.27 86 Standard for Ovens and Furnaces ( 1995 Edition)
n.2.28 90A Standard for the Installation of Air Conditioning and Ventilating Systems
(1996 Edition)
16
n.2.29 91 Standard for Exhaust Systems for Air Conveying of Materials (1995 Edition)
n.2.30 96 Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking
Operations (1994 Edition)
n.2.31 231 Standard for General Storage (1995 Edition)
n.2.32 231C Standard for Rack Storage of Materials (1995 Edition)
n.2.34 407 Standard for Aircraft Fuel Servicing (1996 Edition)
n.2.35 409 Standard on Aircraft Hangers (1995 Edition)
n.2.36 490 Code for the Storage of Ammonium Nitrate (1993 Edition)
n.2.37 498 Standard for Safe Havens and Interchange Lots for Vehicles Transporting
Explosives (1996 Edition)
n.2.38 651 Standard for the Manufacture of Aluminum Powder (1993 Edition)
n.2.39 704 Standard System for the Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency
Response (1996 Edition)
n.2.40 1231 Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting
(1993 Edition)
17
APPENDICES
Division I
EXISTING BUILDINGS
APPENDIX I-A is amended with the following modifications:
LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS
(See UFC Sections 102 and 1202.1)
Section 1.2 is deleted and replaced with the following: Compliance Data.
After adoption of this appendix, and after receipt of violation from the appropriate FIRE
DISTRICT Fire Marshal,the Building Official shall duly notify the owners whose buildings are
subject to the provisions of this chapter. Upon receipt of such notice, the owner shall, subject to
time limits established by the Building Official, take necessary actions to comply with the
provisions of this appendix.
Plans and specifications for the necessary alterations shall be filed with the Building Official
within thirty (30) days after the date of owner notifications. Work on the required alterations to
the building shall be completed within ninety (90) days after the date of owner notification.
EXCEPTION: The Building Official may grant necessary extensions of time when it can
be shown that the specified time periods are not physically practical or pose an undue
hardship. The granting of time for compliance shall be based upon the showing of good
cause and subject to the filling of an acceptable systematic progressive plan of correction
with the Building Official.
When required by the Building Official, a pre-plan review meeting shall be held including the
owner's design team, Building Official, and the Fire Chief,to determine the adequacy of the life-
safety emergency systems concept for the building. The Building Official and the Fire Chief may
require sufficient documentation, based upon an engineering analysis, that the concept meets the
intent of nationally recognized good practices and this appendix.
The provisions of this appendix shall not be construed to allow the elimination of fire protection
systems or a reduction in the level of fire safety provided in buildings constructed in conformance
with previously adopted codes.
Section 2.1 is deleted and replaced with the following: Number of exits.
Every floor above the first story shall have access to at least two separate exits. The total number
of exits for all occupancies shall comply with Chapter 10 of the Uniform Building Code. Fire
escapes shall not be considered as meeting the requirements of this Section.
EXCEPTION: In all occupancies, second stories with an occupant load of 10 or less may
have one exit.
18
Section 2.2 Stair Construction. delete the exception after the first paragraph.
Section 2.4 Fire Escapes. is deleted in its entirety.
Section 2.5 Exit and Fire Escape Signs. is renumbered to 2.4
The words "Fire Escape" are deleted from the title.
The second paragraph is also deleted.
Section 3 Enclosure of Vertical Shafts.
Exception 2 is deleted.
Exception 3 is renumbered to "2".
Section 4 Basement Access or Sprinkler Protection.
A new third and fourth paragraph are added to read as follows:
All buildings having floors used for human occupancy located fifty (50) or more feet above the
lowest level of Fire Department access shall be equipped throughout with an approved automatic
fire sprinkler system installed in accordance with UBC Standard 9-1.
Exception: Open parking garages.
All existing I-1.1 Occupancies shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system
throughout.
19
Division III
FIRE PROTECTION
APPENDIX III-C is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
INSPECTION , TESTING, AND RECORD KEEPING
REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
SECTION 1 GENERAL.
1.1 Scope. This appendix provides requirements for the inspection, testing and record keeping for
water type fire extinguishing systems including: sprinkler systems, standpipe systems, hose
cabinets, fire pumps and their associated hardware, fire hydrant systems and fire alarm
systems, their power supplies and control features.
1.2 Intervals. Inspection and testing of system prescribed in this appendix shall be conducted
annually or as specified except that the chief may determine that additional inspections,tests
or maintenance are needed to ensure that the systems or device will operate properly in an
emergency
1.3 Witness. The chief shall be notified in advance of the performance of required tests to allow a
representative of the fire department to witness the test.
1.4 Testing Personnel. The inspections and test prescribed by this standard shall be conducted by
personnel qualified to perform the full procedure for the particular system or device being
inspected or tested.
1.5 Record Keeping. Written records of required inspections and tests shall be maintained. A
copy of these records shall be kept available at the protected property and a copy shall be
submitted to the Fire District.
1.6 Notification of Inoperable System. The Fire District shall be notified, as soon as possible, if
any system or equipment regulated by this appendix is determined to be inoperable.
1.7 Responsibility. The property owner or manager is responsible for assuring that the required
inspection and test requirements specified in this appendix are performed.
1.8 Definitions. The following terms are defined:
20
1.8.1 Inspection. A visual examination of the system, a portion of the system or a device to verify
that the system or device appears to be in proper working condition, not blocked or obstructed
and that the system or device is free from physical damage.
1.8.2 Testing. Physical checks conducted on the system, part of the system or device to determine
the serviceability of the system or device.
21
SECTION 2 - INSPECTION FREQUENCY AND SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR
WATER-TYPE FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS.
2.1 Fire Department Connections.
2.1.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
1. Visually inspect all fire department connections for signs of corrosion or mechanical
damage.
2. Check to see that the protective caps are in place.
3. Remove the protective caps and look for foreign material in the pipe.
4. Determine that the clappers or swing checks are in proper working order.
5. Determine that the check valve is not leaking and that the fire department connection is
dry and reasonably free from corrosion.
6. Determine that the gaskets are in place and in good condition.
7. Determine that the swivels are free moving.
2.2 Valves controlling the water supply.
2.2.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
1. Determine that the valve is fully open, accessible and has no signs of physical damage.
2. Check to see that the valve is properly supervised, sealed or locked in the open position.
2.2.2 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
1. Exercise the valve to ensure that it is free moving.
2. Determine that any alarm supervision is working.
2.3 Main Drain.
2.3.1 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
1. Conduct a main drain flow test and determine if the water supply is adequate.
2. Determine that the drain discharges at a point where it is not like to cause water
damage.
Check to see that the valve does not leak and that it is free moving.
2.4 Inspectors Test Valves & Central Station Monitor.
2.4.1 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
1. Open each inspectors test valve & determine that all flow switches & alarm
annunciation is working. Alarms should operate no sooner than 30
seconds and no longer that 2 minutes.
2. Check the water motor gong and/or flow switches to ensure that they are not leaking.
3. Contact Central Station Monitor to ensure that they have received the alarm signal.
22
2.5 Dry-Pipe, Pre-action and Deluge Valves.
2.5.1 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
Trip test shall be conducted annually.
2.6 Other Valves on the System.
2.6.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
1. Check each valve to ensure that they are in proper (open/closed) position.
2. Check each valve required to be kept in the open position to ensure that they are
sealed, locked or supervised in the open position.
3. Ensure that all control valves are properly labeled.
4. Exercise each valve and restore to proper position.
5. Determine that the valve does not leak and that the packing is tight and lubricated.
NOTE: On wet standpipes outlets, check to see that the cap gaskets are in place and that
the caps are tight before exercising the valve outlets. After the valve has been worked,
the water between the valve and the cap should be drained off and the cap dried before it
is reinstalled.
2.7 Tamper Switches.
2.7.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
Visually check the tamper switches to ensure that they are in place and appear to be
in good working condition.
2.7.2 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
1. Operate each valve equipped with a tamper switch. The valve should not close more
than one quarter of the way without activation of the supervision.
2. Determine that a trouble or supervisory signal was received by the alarm control
panel and that when the valve is restored, the signal clears.
3. Determine if the switch is securely mounted.
2.8 Sprinklers.
2.8.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
1. Check sprinkler heads to determine if they are free from loading, corrosion and paint,
and that they are not leaking.
2. Determine that there are no obstructed sprinkler heads, and that spacing and
temperature rating are proper.
2.9 Pressure Gauge.
2.9.1 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
Test reliability of system's pressure gauges. Questionable gauges should be tested
23
against an approved test gauge.
2.10. Fire Hydrants.
2.10.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
All fire hydrants which would normally be used by the Fire District shall be inspected to
ensure they are visible, accessible and appear in good order.
2.10.2 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
All fire hydrants shall be flow tested to ensure they are in proper working order.
2.11 Stand pipes.
2.11.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
1. Inspect the outlets to ensure they are accessible, the protective caps are in place and
the valves are fully closed.
2. Wet standpipe system valves controlling water supplies shall be inspected in
accordance with section 2.2.
3. Visually inspect the hose to ensure it is accessible and that nozzles and required seals
or clamps are in place.
4. Remove and re-rack hose. Check hose for mildew, cuts or other deterioration.
5. Check hose coupling, gaskets and nozzle for serviceability and obstructions.
NOTE: Annual standpipe outlet valve maintenance should be conducted in conjunction
with this inspection by capping the outlets then exercising and lubricating the valves.
2.11.1 Test. Test shall be completed every five (5) years.
1. A flow test shall be conducted by flowing the required volume of water at the design
pressure to the hydraulically most remote, highest or dead-end hose connection of
each zone of a standpipe system. Where a flow test of the hydraulically most remote
outlet is not practical, the Fire District shall be consulted for the appropriate location
for the test.
2. All systems shall be flow tested and pressure tested at the requirements in effect at
the time of installation. The actual test method(s) and performance criteria shall be
discussed in advance with the Fire District.
2.12 Tanks.
2.12.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
1. Visually check for tank leaks, signs of corrosion or physical damage.
2. Determine that the automatic filling system is operating.
2.13 Fire Pumps.
2.13.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
24
1. Conduct a flow test in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations and in
accordance with NFPA 20, 1996 Ed. The minimum acceptable flow test shall include
pressure and flow results at churn, capacity and 150% of rated capacity.
2.14 Check Valves.
2.14.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed every five (5) years.
1. Check valves should be internally inspected to verify that all components operate
properly, move freely and are in good condition.
2.15 Flow Switches
2.15.1 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
1. Visually check for signs of leaking or corrosion.
2. Visually check for physical damage.
3. Operate the flow switch using the inspector's test valve. Time the delay in operation.
Adjust the flow switch, if necessary, to operate no sooner than thirty (30) seconds or no
longer than two (2) minutes after the flow is initiated.
25
SECTION 3 - INSPECTION FREQUENCY AND SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE
ALARM SYSTEMS.
3.1 Fire Alarm Control and Annunciator Panels.
3.1.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
Visually check all control panels for physical damage.
3.1.2 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
1. Activate the system and verify that the panel will announce alarm and trouble signals.
2. Measure and record the output of the power supply and battery charging unit.
3. All lamps are to be tested and non-working lamps replaced.
4. Activate a device in each zone and ensure that each zone will properly activate the system.
3.2 Battery.
3.2.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
1. Visually check the battery for physical damage or corrosion.
2. Check for corrosion on the battery terminals.
3. Check fluid levels if applicable.
4. Battery shall be marked with the date installed. When replaced, the new battery shall be of
the proper type and rating.
5. Disconnect, clean and reconnect the battery terminals.
3.2.2 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
With the line power disconnected and the system in normal operation, measure the voltage
output of the battery. With all of the system audio/visual devices activated, measure the
voltage output. Compare results to the last years readings and replace battery if there is a
decrease of more than twenty-five percent (25%).
NOTE: If the battery is lead acid, hydrometer readings shall be taken monthly and the battery
replaced if it does not perform to the manufacturers specifications. A copy of the monthly
readings shall be submitted to Town of Oro Valley annually with all other required reports.
3.3 Smoke Detectors.
3.3.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
Visually check the smoke detectors to insure that they are clean and not physically
damaged or obstructed.
3.3.2 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
1. All smoke detectors shall be tested in place to ensure smoke entry into the sensing
chamber and alarm response. Testing with smoke or listed aerosol acceptable to the
manufacturer, or other means acceptable to the detector manufacturer shall be permitted as
one acceptable test method.
26
2. Ensure that each smoke detector is within its listed and marked sensitivity range by testing
using either:
A) A calibrated test method, or
B) The manufacturer's calibrated sensitivity test equipment, or
C) Listed control equipment arranged for the purpose.
NOTES: 1. Detector sensitivity shall be checked within one (1) year after
installation and every alternate year after that.
2. The detector sensitivity shall not be tested or measured using any device
that administers an unmeasured concentration of smoke or other aerosol
into the detector.
3.4 Heat Detectors.
3.4.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
Visually check to see that the devices are not physically damaged or obstructed.
3.4.2 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
1. Fixed Temperature. Systems which have fixed temperature heat detectors which are
fifteen(15) years old or older shall have recurring periodic tests every five (5) years. Two
(2) devices per one hundred(100) shall be removed and tested at an independent testing
laboratory. When heat detectors are removed for testing,they shall be replaced with new
heat detectors of the proper type for the application. If any device does not pass the test,
additional devices shall be removed and tested as a further check to determine if a general
problem involving faulty detectors is indicated. If there are failures in the second test,the
remaining heat detectors shall be replaced with new heat detectors.
2. Rate of Rise/Fixed Temperature Restorable. Systems which have restorable heat
detectors shall have recurring periodic tests involving twenty percent (20%) of the
detectors annually so that all detectors are tested within five (5) years. Detectors shall be
tested using a hair dryer or shielded heat lamp.
3.5 Manual Pull Stations and Other Manual Devices.
3.5.1 Inspection. Inspection shall be completed annually.
Visually check to ensure that the pull stations are not physically damaged and that they are
accessible and visible.
3.5.2 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
Operate each device and ensure that it is properly zoned and in good working condition.
3.6 Audio and/or Visual Alarm Devices.
3.6.1 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
1. Activate the system and determine that the alarm signal is clearly audible in all protected
27
areas.
2. Visually check all devices to ensure that they are working. Check for physical damage and
clean or adjust as needed.
3.7 Other Control Features.
3.7.1 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
Other control features shall be tested annually. Tests shall demonstrate the
serviceability of the equipment and shall include an operational test whenever possible.
3.8 Central Station Monitor.
3.8.1 Test. Test shall be completed annually.
Operate the system and verify that the signal is being received by the monitor. Record the
time and date of the test.
SECTION 9 - APPEALS
Whenever the building official/fire marshal disapproves an application or when it is claimed that the
provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of the code have been
misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal to the BOARD OF APPEALS OF
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY within 30 days.
SECTION 10 - PENALTIES
Any person who violates any of the provisions of the UNIFORM FIRE CODE as adopted and
amended herein or fails to comply with such an order as affirmed or modified by the TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, shall for each and every such violation and non-compliance, respectively be guilty
of a civil infraction.
28
house lights in case of an emergency.
3. CHANGE OF ELEVATION. Any change of elevation within a building or structure operating
at reduced lighting levels shall be provided with a minimum of one foot candle illumination.
2506.4 Fire Protection. Fire Protection for amusement buildings shall be in accordance with Section
1003.2.3.6 of this Code.
13
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 12
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 12/16/98
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney
SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R) 98- 104 , Intergovernmental agreement with Golder Ranch Fire
District for Fire Marshal services
SUMMARY: Per the direction of the Council, attached is a Intergovernmental Agreement with Golder Ranch Fire
District for providing the Town of Oro Valley Fire Marshal Services. As agreed, this service is to be
provided for at no cost to the Town.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution No.(R)98- 104 ,plus attachment of intergovernmental agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Acceptance is recommended.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move that we accept Resolution No.(R)98-104 for Fire Marshal services.
or
I move that we deny Resolution No.(R)98- 104 •
•
Signature of Departme� ead
#ry ,
Town Manager's Review
RESOLUTION NO. (R) 98- 104
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA,ACCEPTING AND
ADOPTING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH
GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT FOR FIRE MARSHAL
SERVICES
WHEREAS,the Town of Oro Valley desires to provide the best possible fire
services for their citizens; and
WHEREAS,the Town has authority under state statutes to provide fire related
services to its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the attached agreement with Golder Ranch Fire District for Fire
Marshal services provides this service to the Town citizens; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA THAT THE
FOLLOWING RESOLUTION FOR FIRE MARSHAL SERVICES IS
HEREBY ADOPTED:
1 That the attached Resolution and Intergovernmental Agreement with
Golder Ranch Fire District, dealing with Fire Marshal services is hereby
adopted by this resolution, finding this document to be necessary for the
continued public health, safety and welfare;
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 199 by the
Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Town Clerk Town Attorney
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and Council
From: Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney 2—'4-
Re: Golder Ranch IGA for Fire Marshal services
Date: 12-14-98
Don Chatfield and I met with Chief Fink on Friday, December 11th to go over the
proposed IGA. The Golder Ranch attorney had several clauses that she wanted added.
None of them make any difference in the agreement, they are all legal "boilerplate"
provisions. However, we have added them and this is the agreement that Golder Ranch
intends to pass at their meeting today the 14th, and the agreement the Council will be
asked to pass on the 16th. The attached copy is the revised agreement you are being asked
to approve, not the ones in your packets.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH GOLDER RANCH FIRE
DISTRICT FOR FIRE MARSHAL SERVICES
This agreement is entered into this day of , 19 , by and between
the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona, a body politic of the State of Arizona,
hereinafter referred to as "Town" pursuant to A.R.S. 9-240 et. seq. and 11-951 et. seq.
and the Golder Ranch Fire District, hereinafter referred to as "District", pursuant to Arizona
Revised Statutes 48-801 et. seq., as amended for the purpose of having the Golder Ranch
Fire District act as the Town Fire Marshal for those areas within the town in the Golder
Ranch Fire District and within the Town not within the Golder Ranch Fire District until such
time as the Town Council deems otherwise. This is for the purposes of public health, safety
and welfare and to provide a better fire safety educational environment for Town
residents. Each party, through their respective governing bodies, officers and employees
agree to take such actions as may be necessary or reasonably required with reasonable
promptness.
I. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DISTRICT
1. It will be the responsibility of the District to provide appropriately trained personnel
as determined by the Town and the District to handle the following issues for the
Town of Oro Valley
A. Under the Uniform Fire Code as adopted by the town, (hereinafter referred
to as the code) enforcement responsibilities, establish a procedure to inspect
commercial businesses with Town staff and follow that procedure.
B. Under the code enforcement responsibilities, establish a procedure and
process to inspect new construction during the construction process to
ensure the structure meets the approved plans and follows that procedure
with a copy of the inspection results to the Town Building Department by the
close of the following business day.
C. Provide quality, responsive, thorough, and courteous service at a level the
Mayor and Council deems appropriate. The Fire Marshall should be notified
within ten working days by writing for any perceived deficiencies.
D. Keep a log of time spent and on what activity, regarding the Town of Oro
Valley, with a copy of all reports to the Town Building Safety Division on a
weekly basis based on the 1997 UFC and/or as amended by the Town of Oro
Valley.
E. Review plans for fire safety as sent to them by the Town and return those
plans with any recommendation or comments of correction to ensure the
minimum requirements have been met within seven (7) working days,
including the name and phone number of the reviewer. The Plan reviewer
will be required to regularly interact with other public safety officials and
agencies at the local, state and federal level, including the Town Building
A:\COLDER RANCH ICA-DRAFT NUMBER 5.DOC
Official, Public Works, Zoning, Health Department and others, to ensure the
construction of fire safe, code conforming buildings.
F. Ensure that materials and information are provided to schools, preschoolers,
older adults, homeowners associations, apartment complexes, nursing homes
and hospital or hospice staffs, churches, town staff, business groups,
Chamber of Commerce meetings and other organizations as appropriate
and/or as directed by the Town for education activities throughout the entire
Town. This education may include home fire escapes, babysitting fire safety,
cooking fires, clothing fires, juvenile fire setters, first aid for burns, home
hazard inspections, scald prevention, smoke detectors, fire extinguishers,
evacuation of disabled persons and sprinkler systems and other subjects
deemed appropriate by the District. The education process shall include such
phases as initial planning, design and implementation and evaluation.
G. Report to the Town Building Safety Division possible violations and issue any
appropriate citations after any consultation as appropriate with the Police
Department, Building Safety Division and the Town Prosecutor. The Fire
Marshal shall provide a copy of all documents to the Town Building Safety
Division for the address records.
H. Fire cause detection and investigation shall be done in accordance with
nationally recognized standards for fire investigation in determining the facts
and conducting an investigation both within and in conjunction with the
Town of Oro Valley (as appropriate).
2. The District shall be responsible for approving this IGA and filing it with the Pima
County recorders office prior to beginning their duties. It is understood the District
will provide these services to the Town for free (at no cost).
3. If any changes occur for the position of Fire Marshal for Oro Valley within the life of
this agreement, Oro Valley will be notified as soon as is reasonably possible. The
Town acknowledges that Golder Ranch participates in mutual aid and automatic aid
agreements with other fire districts. From time to time, services may be provided at
the request of the District by personnel from other fire districts and specifically by
Northwest Fire District personnel.
II. INSURANCE
Both parties agree that it shall maintain for the duration of this IGA, policies of public
liability insurance covering all their obligations undertaken in the implementation of this
IGA providing bodily injury limits of not less than $1 million for any person, and not less
than $1 million for any one occurrence, and property damage liability to a limit not less
than $1 million.
A:\GOLDER RANCH IGA-DRAFT NUMBER 5.DOC
III. MUTUAL INDEMNIFICATION
Tothe extent which it legally may, each party shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
9 Y
the other party, its officers, departments, employees, attorney, and agent from and against
any and all suits, actions, claims, demands or damages of any kind or nature arising out
of this agreement which results in any act or omission of the indemnifying agency, its
agents, employees, anyoneactingunder its direction on its behalf, whether intentional
or
or negligent.
IV. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE TOWN
P
1)
The Town shall be responsible for initiating and following through with the
development a procedure rocedure to inspect commercial businesses based on the Uniform
Building Code as adopted by the State or Town.
Town's BuildingSafetyAdministrator shall be responsible for the supervision
2) The o .
of the BuildingSafetyDepartment Inspectors. If the Fire Marshal has
and direction p
changes to be made in the areas of fire inspection for new
anyor existing
construction, the changes must be mutually agreed upon by the Building Safety
Administrator and the Fire Marshal before implementation.
3) The Town
shall be the ultimate authorityfor all plan review and inspections for new
construction. Interpretation responsibility for new construction will reside with the
p tv
Building Safety Administrator with input from the Fire Marshal.
4) The Town shall be the ultimate authorityfor all plan review and inspections for
existing construction with input from the Fire Marshal. Interpretation responsibility
for existing construction will be handled mutually between the Building Safety
Administrator and the Fire Marshal.
specifically the BuildingSafetyDivision, the Police Department and the
5) The Town, spec y
Legal Department, to cooperate with the District in accomplishing the
agree
purposes of this agreement
V. TERM OF AGREEMENT
shall remain in effect in perpetuity until the Town completes its strategic
This agreement P p
plan regarding emergency fire and emer enc services. Once that plan is completed, the Town
Golder Ranch Fire District personnel as the Town Fire Marshal,
reserves the right to dismiss
Ranch as the Fire Marshal
or to keep Golder depending upon the decision of the Town
mayalso be terminated bythe District upon 30 days written notice
Council. This agreement
to the Town.
A:\GOLDER RANCH IGA-DRAFT NUMBER 5.DOC
VI. NOTICE
Anyand all notices, requests and/or demands made upon a party pursuant to or in
Q
conjunction with the IGA shall be delivered in person, sent by U.S. Mail, faxed, or phoned
to the following:
The Town:
The Town of Oro Valley
ATTN: Town Manager
11000 N. La Canada
Oro Valley, AZ 85737
With a copy to:
Community Development Director
11000 N. la Canada
Oro Valley, AZ 85737
The District:
Golder Ranch Fire District
Fire Chief
3535 E. Hawser St.
Tucson, AZ 85739
With a copy to:
Donna M. Aversa
250 N. Meyer Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85701
VII. FINANCING
Both the Town and the District have sufficient funds in their respective budgets to carry
out their obligations under this IGA. Should either party fail to obtain continued funding
during the term of this IGA or the failure of appropriation or approval of funds, that in such
event, this IGA shall be deemed to terminate for lack of funds as of the last day such funds
are available.
VIII. JURISDICTION
may as
Except be specifically set forth in the terms of this IGA, this IGA shall not be
Y p Y
construed to either limit or extend a legal jurisdiction of either party.
IX. NON-DISCRIMINATION
Each agrees Partyto be bound bya plicable state and federal rules and regulations
, p
governingequal employment opportunities and non-discrimination.
A:\GOLDER RANCH IGA-DRAFT NUMBER 5.DOC
X. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
This agreement is subject to the provisions of A.R.S. 38-511.
XI. EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP
IGA I A does not and shall not be construed to create any partnership, joint venture, or
relationship between the parties or creating any employer/employee
employment re.at p
relationship between Town employees and District Employees. Neither party shall be liable
for any debts, accounts, obligations, or other liabilities whatsoever of the other including,
g ,
the otherparties obligation to withhold social security and income tax
without limitation, g
for any of its employees or to provide workman's compensation coverage.
XII. THIRD PARTIES
part,this IGA is determined, in or
whole in to be void by any court action brought by a
party who is not a party to this IGA, there shall be no liability on the part of either the
Town or the District to the other by
reason of such action or by reason of this IGA. Nothing
in this IGA, express or implied, is
intended to confer any rights or remedies under or by
reason of this IGA on any person other than the parties to this IGA and their respective
successors and assigns.
XIII. ARBITRATION
To the extent legally applicable, the parties agree to use arbitration as provided for by
A.R.S. 12-1518 to resolve disputes arising out of this IGA.
Dated this day of , 1998 by a majority affirmative vote
of the Golder Ranch Fire District Board and the Town of Oro Valley Town Council. By
' District both certifythey have received the appropriate
signing below, the Town and the
9 g this IGA.
and have taken the appropriate pPriate action by the Fire Board to approve P
A:\GOLDER RANCH IGA-DRAFT NUMBER 5.DOC
on behalf
of Golder Ranch Fire District on behalf of the Town of Oro Valley
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Golder Ranch Legal Counsel Oro Valley Legal Counsel
ATTEST: ATTEST:
rk or Notary ry Town Clerk
C:IWINDOWSIDESKTOP\FILESZOLDER RANCH IGA•DRAFT NUMBER 4.DOC
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 13
COUNCIL COMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: David Hook, P.E., Water Utility Director
SUBJECT: Project No. W09-0998
Town of Oro Valley Water Utility
Water Plant No. 23 Production Well and 12"Main Extension
SUMMARY:
Per the direction of Mayor and Council through the Town of Oro Valley Water Utilities Commercial Readiness
Program,plans and specifications were provided for the acceptance of public bids for the following project:
Project No. W09-0998
Water Plant No. 23, Production Well and 12" Main Extension
The project consists of the installation of a new well pump and motor, hydropneumatic tank, electrical panel,
site piping, site work,block wall, and approximately 900 lineal feet of offsite 12"water main.
ATTACHMENTS: Bid Opening Tabulation
Project No. W09-0998
FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount bid by the low bidder was $250,246.00 by Gilbert Pump &
Equipment, Co.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. We recommend the award of Contract No. W09-0998 to Gilbert Pump & Equipment, Co., the lowest
responsible bidder, in the amount of$250,246.00.
B. Direct the Water Utility Director to prepare a Notice of Award to Gilbert Pump & Equipment, Co. and
transmit said Notice along with the Contract Agreement and Bond Forms for execution.
C. Direct the Water Utility Director to issue the Notice to Proceed in accordance with the requirements of
the Contract Agreement upon the receipt of the Contract Agreement.
D. Authorize the Water Utility Director to execute Contract Change Orders and/or Supplemental
Agreements incidental to the prosecution of Work.
E. Direct the Town Clerk to hold the bid bonds from all bidders until such time that a Contract Agreement
has been executed.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMUNICATION Page 2 of 2
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to approve the award of Contract No. W09-0998 to Gilbert Pump & Equipment, Co.
Or
I move to deny
cam'
ater Utility Director
/
/ '4
Town Mana:er
f .
4
1
.. 7 i •
n
pt.
P-,,.
C ...-. -- Gr? -1 Q, ,d, 45. L.j t.� - 7
r '
A V, 4-... �.., t-,) - - 0
t
4
f -r �f
_741 'I. t • -
ST gi
:41 1 ri:„„ — . cm
"I
N I (Th c'- 4" ;1.-
. c ..;-: n
ri
tt, CD
141 40
' - --. t "c) ill 'po.. .0.".
C, C , r6 tt\ r.-S) -$ :--- 3 1de
n o
Fa.; L' ,
n n 9'- -* 1-.'1 c'11 M
Y
I C-4-t: ^- al;i
X
td 1 Oji > -a
Qo
if
I T\--(\ 1 (7,4- u
..=,..
7 4 0 -'-°- n 4
rri < ;1,- ,i 7.
" mi P-i -- n
k....e .,, rri 2
L 1 . n wp --- x P •-i
r " C< C 'v7d trl -1QC
,t F P m
. .... .. \e. r.
_ - = = Vi.- q, \O' •J!' , ,t) ..„. 00
CZ
1 1 L I ,_, 'P.
Cr N ce
)k,'q, q cn u
\- . c''• Zr.:". tv x
y Qo r
z
-a
N
, , K.ii :c.
),, ruc:, r:
5-1
• C› r
fi ca
c ..
- - - - 1 •
t'O' d 8156-9OZ-OZ5 . sao..tnosall pu>e-1l.saM dSO=t'O 86-bO-tea❑
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 14
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16th, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: David Marsh, Planner I
SUBJECT: OV12-98-02, Stone Canyon I (North) Final Plat, Lots 1-57, Common Areas A, B, C and D,
Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11,Parcels C,D,E, and AD
BACKGROUND:
Ten parcels of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 were combined to form the 198.26 acre preliminary plat of Stone Canyon I
subdivision. Located in the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso, north and west of the existing Golf Club at Rancho
Vistoso,the new subdivision is the first phase of a new resort, golf course and single family residential gated community, all
part of a recently revised conceptual plan for Neighborhood 11.
On May 20th, 1998, Town Council approved a Preliminary Plat for Stone Canyon I, Lots 1 — 125, located in
Neighborhood 11 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Since that.time, the applicant.has essentially `split' the-development,
revising the southern portion of the preliminary plat, involving all lots south of Tortolita Mountain Drive. Stone Canyon I
(North), before Council this evening, consists of Lots 1=57 of the orginal preliminary plat, all of which are located north
of Tortolita Mountain Drive. The WLB Group, representing the developers, requests Town Council approval for the
Stone Canyon I(North)Final Plat.
The project is located in the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso, north and west of the existing Golf Club at Rancho
Vistoso, and the property will be accessed via an extension of the existing Vistoso Highlands Drive. The existing
condition of the site is mostly undisturbed desert. Diverse topography, rock outcrops and several washes characterize the
property.
SUMMARY: ' -�.- � . .� � ; � � � � �
This is the first final plat within the limits of this new gated golf community, and a variety of custom homes will be built on
the lots. Although the zoning of the parcels are a mix of low and medium density residential that permit a higher density,the
57 lot single family residential subdivision is designed at a lower overall density of 0.79 dwelling units per acre. A range of
lot sizes are provided,with a minimum lot size of 34,248 SF,and an average lot size of 49,807 SF. The plat is in compliance
with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and in general compliance with the OVZCR. The planning & zoning issues are discussed
below.
100-Year Flood Areas and Riparian Habitat Overlay District
The proposed plat contains several 100-year flood areas within the boundaries of the development, most notably on the
western portion of the site. There are numerous lots which `lot' into the 100-year flood area, which is permitted in the
OVZCR with restrictions, and the applicant has agreed to place a conservation easement on areas within the 100-year
flood limits.
The proposed development also contains several areas of riparian habitat, and the developer has commissioned a riparian
habitat study for the subdivision area. Although the Town's riparian habitat map does not identify such habitat on this site,
the results of the study identify"limits of riparian habitat along reaches of 2 washes in Section 23",for a total of 15.93 acres
of habitat that meet the classification criteria used in the Town's study. One wash was classified as low Xeroriparian and the
second as intermediate Xeroriparian habitat. There are several lots which 'lot' into the riparian habitat areas, and thus are
grounds for some concern. While `lotting' into riparian areas is permitted, Staff recommends that the riparian habitat areas
ie set aside and protected with a conservation easement (see Condition #3). This condition was also a condition for
approval for the preliminary plat for this project,as approved by Town Council on May 20th, 1998.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 4
Recreation Area Requirements
The preliminary plat for this subdivision orginally included several lots designated as a `recreation area'. Since that time
the applicant has proposed a central recreation area for both the northern and southern portions of Stone Canyon I, and
the Stone Canyon II residential subdivision(now in the preliminary plat stage). Staff does not oppose a central recreation
area for the three subdivisions; however, Staff has placed as a Condition of Approval that the final plat for Stone Canyon
I (North) not be recorded until Town Council has reviewed and approved the central recreation area(see Condition# 1).
This will ensure that the final plat is in conformance with the requirements of the OVZCR as it relates to recreation areas.
Plat Design
The Stone Canyon I development will be a large-lot, custom-home subdivision, and there are proposed grading restrictions
placed on the lots in an effort to minimize impacts and preserve portions of the natural Sonoran desert. A 20,000 SF grading
restriction has been placed on all lots 36,000 SF or greater in size, and grading limits for lots under 36,000 SF in size will be
restricted to 15,000 SF, with a possible increase to 20,000 SF..subject.toy review and approval of the Planning and Zoning
Administrator. In addition, the plat also contains several large significant outcropings, and the applicant has set these areas
aside as `no-build' areas.
A portion of the Stone Canyon I (North) Final Plat is not located within the Town of Oro Valley limits. The main road
servicing both the north and south portions of Stone Canyon I, and a smaller road accessing a portion of Stone Canyon I
(North) are located within unincorporated Pima County. Staff has placed a Condition of Approval which requires Pima
County review and approval of these roads before the final plat is recorded(see Condition# 5). The applicant was informed
of this requirement in the initial stages of the final plat process.
La Cholla Airpark
The proposed Stone Canyon I development lies within the flight path of the La Cholla Airpark, ant active private airport
located just to the west of the development, immediatelyoutside the Town limits.
This situation hasp the potential for adverse
noise impacts on the development, as well as the potential for resident complaint.and �pressure over the activities of the
p .
airpark. The applicant has agreed to include as a general note that all perspective buyers shall be informed of the active
status of the La Cholla Airpark(see General Note#31 on the plat).
Traffic
Vistoso Highlands Drive (a minor collector road) willbe constructed from its existing terminus northward to the
proposed intersection with Tortolita Mountain Drive. Tortolita.Mountain Drive is another minor collector and will
eventually be constructed to intersect with Rancho Vistoso Boulevard'to the east and with a lOop road,to the northwest.
Several interior roads will intersect Tortolita Mountain Drive. Two of these'interior roads exceed the 600 feet maximum
cul-de-sac length. Therefore turnaround areas have been provided along these streets to satisfy emergency service
providers' concerns for the excessive cul-de-sac lengths, and the applicant has agreed with ,Golder Ranch Fire
Department to `sprinkler' the homes in this development.
This subdivision is expected to generate 418 trips per day to and from Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. Additionally, there
will be approximately 260 trips to and from the Stone Canyon Golf Course from'the Stone Canyon 1 'subdivision. Other
than extension of Vistoso Highlands Drive, no other offsite road improvements will be necessary as a result of building
out this subdivision. The project traffic engineer forecasts that a traffic signal may be warranted at the Rancho Vistoso
Boulevard intersection in the year 2008. The engineer estimates that 7% of the traffic through the Vistoso Highlands
)rive/Rancho Vistoso Boulevard intersection will be from the Stone Canyon I project.
4
•
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 4
Drainage
This project site generally drains from north to south... Drainage generated onsite will enter one of'several small to
moderate sized natural drainageways. These drainageways can carry significant stormwater 'runoff. The largest flow
occurs in the wash along the western property line. The project will not cross or encroach into this wash: 'Another large
wash flows through the central portion of the north half of the subdivision. Tortolita Mountain Drive will cross this wash
in the vicinity of lots 11 and 21. Portions of lots 5-7, 11 and 19-21 lie within the floodplain for this wash. There is
adequate buildable area on these lots outside the floodplain.
The lot density for this development is relatively small. Drainage from the developed site will, for the most part, follow
existing natural drainage patterns. However,.some small `v'-ditches may be required along streets. Ribbon curbs will be
used on both sides of the street to minimize erosion to road shoulders.
Grading
Grading will be restricted to preparation of roads-and streets. 'Lots-will-be g"raded`ori"ar individual basis"for construction
of custom homes. Significant cut and fill will not be necessary to construct the streets and roads for this project. The
centerline of the roads and streets will closely match existing topography. There will be visible cut and fill slopes
adjacent to portions of the road surfaces. Rancho Vistoso PAD grading standards apply to this property. No grading
waiver is required for this project.
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Staff finds that the Stone Canyon I final plat is in conformance with the low-density residential land use density designation
of 1.2 dwellingunitsper acre. As proposed, theplat,also romotes`Polic 1.l I, to "encourage the. use of building
p p p y
envelopes...[where]the area outside the building envelope must be maintained in a natural state". .
RECOMMENDATION: : . t
Staff recommends approval, subject to those conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions:
I move to approve OV 12-98-2 Stone Canyon I (North)Final Plat, Lots 1-57, Common Areas A, B, C, & D, Rancho Vistoso
Neighborhood 11, Parcels C, D, E, & AD, effective on thedate of satisfaction of attached conditions listed in Exhibit A,
attached herewith. , •
OR
I move to approve OV 12-98-2 Stone Canyon I(North)Final Plat, Lots 1-57, Common Areas A, B, C, & D, Rancho Vistoso
Neighborhood 11, Parcels C, D, E, & AD, effective on the date of satisfaction of attached conditions listed in Exhibit A,
attached herewith, and the following added conditions:
OR
•
I move to deny OV 12-98-2 Stone Canyon I (North) Final Plat,Lots.1-57,`Common Areas A, B,`C, &D, Rancho Vistoso
Neighborhood 11,Parcels C,D, E, &AD, finding that: ''s
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 4
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit A
2. Reduced Copy of Final Plat
F:\12-98-02\PPTC.RPT
e
Pla g .nd Zoning ; ' istrator
Co•� - y Dev:_ t Director
. 4/A Atfc
• Manager
+u.1. .I'YI�/�V•w•r'Me-.awl•e++.�r.•r..��.. .. ..Y:.-..-• K•.n.••N•.".•. • �w
•
•
•
l'f r.Mfti-w wv'rpf
.-�..w..i,.. w•r••� ta.♦y. ..a•�...•...w.....;.r.,'�. -....i.W••�-....,. .r.���r.f..:•.. . ..�•1a•if.a...
r .
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
OV 12-98-2 STONE CANYON I (NORTH)FINAL PLAT,
LOTS 1-57, COMMON AREAS A,B , C, & D,
RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11,PARCELS C,D,E, & Al)
The following conditions shall be resolved to the Planning & Zoning Administrator's satisfaction prior to recordation of
the final plat.
1. The Stone Canyon II Preliminary Plat, and its associated recreation area, shall be approved by Town Council
prior to the recordation of the Final Plat for Stone Canyon I(North).
2. Add Common Area"D"to the Title Block on all sheets.
3. All areas contained within the limits of the riparian area, as identified by the study conducted by Harris
Environmental dated 7 August 1998, shall be shown in a surveyable manner on the mylars, and shall be recorded
as conservation easements on the final plat. r - .
4. A revegetation plan for all disturbed sections of the riparian areas for this project shall be submitted as part of the
improvement plans for this project.
5. The portions of Tortolita Mountain Drive and Blazing Canyon Drive which are outside the Town limits are
subject to Pima County review and approval prior to recordation of the Final Plat.
S. General Note # 32 shall be reworded to read as follows: "All structuresin this development:(0V12-98-02) shall
have sprinklers installed, with a minimum standard of 13-R, in accordance with the agreement with Golder
Ranch Fire Department."
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 15
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 16, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: Dennis Silva,Jr.,Planner I
SUBJECT: OV12-97-18B CARL'S JR. AT ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN,
LOCATED WEST OF ORACLE ROAD AND SOUTH OF FIRST AVENUE, IN THE ROONEY
RANCH PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT(PAD).
BACKGROUND:
The WLB Group, representing the developers of Carl's Jr., requests Town Council approval of a Development Plan. The
subject property is a .73 acre pad with a 3,050 square foot structure, Building 9B, Block 7, within the Oro Valley Retail
Center. The subject property is abutted on the north by Block 8, which is undeveloped, to the southwest by Block 6,
Building 9A(Brake Max),to the east by Oracle Road, and west by the main parking area of the Oro Valley Retail Center.
SUMMARY:
A one-story convenience use is proposed for this site. The development will have vehicular access off of the main
parking area of the Oro Valley Retail Center. The building features 29 parking spaces, including 2 handicapped accessible
spaces, 3-Class II bike racks, a loading area, and a curved arch connecting the pad with Building 9A (Brake Max), in a
similar style to Pizza Hut and Burger King. A drive-thru lane is also proposed for this site which enters from the north
side of the pad and exits from southwest side of the pad. The major zoning considerations are discussed below.
Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District: Area D of the Rooney Ranch PAD is exempt from all aspects of
ORSCOD, with the exception of the requirement to landscape the Oracle Road Right-of-Way(ROW). The landscaping of
the ROW will be installed and maintained by the developer of the Oro Valley Retail Center.
Rooney Ranch PAD: The Carl's Jr. development plan conforms to all aspects of the Rooney Ranch PAD. The proposed
restaurant use for Building 9B pad is permitted under the PAD. The building envelope proposed is below the 25' height
restriction for all buildings within 200' of Oracle Road.
OVZCR: The Carl's Jr. proposal meets all OVZCR requirements for development plans. The use proposed for the subject
property falls under the classification of"convenience use" under the OVZCR, and is required to have a 12' landscape
buffer on all sides of the site,which the applicant has provided.
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE:
The Carl's Jr. Development Plan complies with the Town of Oro Valley General Plan, as the restaurant use proposed is
consistent with the Community Commercial designation for the site.
TRAFFIC:
Access to the site will be provided by a proposed 24' wide Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) to be constructed by Target
development and joint access to through PAALS of adjacent pads. The PAAL to be constructed by Target development will
extend from Pusch View Lane and connect to the existing PAAL west of the existing Wells Fargo Bank.
On Saturday,the busiest day for Carl's Jr.,this project is expected to generate peak hour of 92 trips in, and 88 trips out. The
drive through will have six stacking spaces,which are adequate for this type of restaurant.
[-.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 3
DRAINAGE:
The off-site flows from Block 8, which impacts this site will be conveyed through two proposed 24' wide PAAL into two
24' wide PAAL of the proposed Brake Max which is its historical discharge point.
GRADING:
Fill will be placed over most of the site. Approximately 2 feet of fill will be placed on the building location with lesser
amount for the parking lot. The OVZCR requirements are met.
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed Development Plan for Carl's Jr., subject to the condition attached as
Exhibit"A".
SUGGESTED MOTION:
The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions:
I move to approve OV 12-97-18B, Carl's Jr. at Oro Valley Retail Center Development Plan, effective on the date of
satisfaction of attached conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith.
OR
I move to approve OV 12-97-18B, Carl's Jr. at Oro Valley Retail Center Development Plan, effective on the date of
satisfaction of attached conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith and the following added conditions:
OR
I move to deny OV 12-97-18B, Carl's Jr. at Oro Valley Retail Center Development Plan, finding that:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit"A" - Condition for Approval
2. Reduced Copy of the Development Plan
ksiiIL
i►
t. .
P . in , d Zoni : • :A inistrator
1
., , •i
g f /
I _ a ‘ , 40 h
Co ' 'y D-,del.pm=11 II irector
, /
IK/ 41 / I 1
Town Manager
F:\ov\ov12\1998\12-97-18B\DPTC.RPT
t.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT"A"
TOWN COUNCIL CONDITION FOR APPROVAL
OV 12-97-18B CARL'S JR. AT ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
1. The last sentence in general note 43 shall be deleted. The period(.)after"prior to"must be deleted.
2. The public art proposal for this project must be reviewed and approved by the Public Art Review Committee
(PARC).
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 16
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 12/16/98
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney
SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R) 98- 105 ,Amending the local travel allowance policy(Council Policy
No. 1) for the Mayor and Council
SUMMARY: At the request of Councilmember Skalsky,this Resolution is submitted to standardize the local
travel allowance policies among the Mayor and Council.Currently the Councilmembers may be reimbursed for any Town
related expenses and the Mayor receives a$150 a month stipend.This proposal eliminates the mayoral stipend and allows
all members of the Council to be reimbursed for town related expenses upon presentation of acceptable receipts to the
Town Finance Director.
ATTACHMENTS:
1)Resolution No.(R)98-_105 plus amendment attachment
FISCAL IMPACT:
Elimination of$150 monthly stipend to the Mayor
RECOMMENDATIONS:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move that we accept Resolution No.(R)98- 105
or
I move that we deny Resolution No.(R)98- 105 and continue with our present policy.
,. .,,, — /,///
I.1
Si: ' .ture of Depa � t Head
Town Manager's Review
•
TOWN COUNCIL POLICY Policy No: 1
ate of Adoption: 8/15/90
Date of Revision: 12/16/98
TITLE: LOCAL TRAVEL ALLOWANCE Page 1 of 1
I. Purpose and Need for Policy
The purpose of this policy is to provide for across the board
reimbursements for all members of the Town Council in order to create
ease of administration. This policy supercedes any and all prior adopted
policies.
II. Policy
It is the policy of the Council to provide for reimbursement for official
town business upon the submission of a receipt to the Town's Finance
Director. The Finance Director has the final authority to determine if any
submission will be reimbursed and whether it complies with all Town and
State policies.
M. Procedure
The Finance Director is directed to pay within two weeks the Mayor and
Councilmembers of the Town of Oro Valley upon the submission of
receipts for official town business expenses. The Finance Director shall
be the sole judge of whether any expense constitutes official town
business and whether reimbursement shall be made. In case of the loss or
absence of a receipt, the Finance Director shall investigate and will make
the final determination whether any claim for reimbursement shall be
honored.
IV. Responsibility and Authority
The Town Finance Director is responsible for implementing this policy of
the Council. Should any violation, deceit or fraud be found to occur on or
after the date of the adoption of this policy by resolution, the Finance
Director has the authority to request reimbursement from the guilty party
and shall submit the matter to the County Attorney for the determination
and implementation of any necessary criminal prosecution.
APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
Date:
RESOLUTION NO. (R) 98-105
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA,AMENDING AND
ADOPTING TOWN COUNCIL POLICY NO. 1,LOCAL TRAVEL
ALLOWANCE
WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley desires to set policies and procedures for
members of the Town Council for local travel reimbursement; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of one standard for all members of the Town Council,
including the Mayor, is found to be easier to administrate and less confusing; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to protect the Town and provide guidelines for all
public officials, including the Mayor and Council specifically with this resolution
for attendance at such town related events;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA THAT THE
FOLLOWING COUNCIL LOCAL TRAVEL ALLOWANCE IS HEREBY
AMENDED AND ADOPTED:
1 That the attached Mayor and Council Policy No. 1, dealing with local
travel policy is hereby amended and adopted by this resolution, finding
this document to be necessary for the continued public health, safety and
welfare;
2. That if any portion of this policy is found to not be enforceable by a court
of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be declared severable, and the
remainder of the policy and other policies will remain in full force and
effect.
3. That his policy amends any prior policies, and supercedes and controls any
prior adopted policies of the Council. This policy will take effect as of the
date provided for by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 199 by the
Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Town Clerk Town Attorney