Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packets - Council Packets (1639)
AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL AND ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION OCTOBER 26, 1998 ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE STUDY SESSION - AT OR AFTER 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. ALTERNATIVE WATER RESOURCES — OPTIONS 2. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ROAD PROJECTS 1998-1999 & BEYOND ADJOURNMENT The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 297-2591. POSTED: 10/23/98 4:00 p.m. sr I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: October 26, 1998 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: DAVID G. HOOK, P.E. WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ALTERNATIVE WATER RESOURCES SUMMARY: Over the last few months, the Water Utility Commission (Commission) has held discussions regarding Alternative Water Resources (AWR). At its regular meeting on 10-12-98, the Commission discussed the matter in great detail in preparation for this joint study session. The Commission Communication for the 10-12-98 meeting is attached for your reference (please reference Attachment #2 of this memo). At the 10-12-98 meeting, Staff presented to the Commission a summary of the information and data available from recent studies and correspondence. Staff also presented a matrix summarizing the cost and schedule of the available short trerm alternatives (please reference Attachment # 1 of this memo). These four alternatives are those that can be implemented in the near term and can compliment other alternatives that will be considered for the long term. Data was collected from several resources, including the Commission's Water Supply Alternatives For The Town Of Oro Valley And Adjacent Water Service Areas report (a.k.a. the Mcgill report), the Northwest Replenishment Project final report, data and work products from the in-process Southern Arizona Regional Water Management Study, the adopted 0 VWU Master Plan, and Pima County. As the discussion at the 10-12-98 meeting came to a close, the Commission concluded that the necessary information was in place to expedite a decision on their part to present a recommendation to the Mayor and Council at this study session. The Commission concluded that Alternative C was not eligible for selection as the preferred alternative since the capacity of wastewater available within the interceptor sewer at the CDO Wash/La Canada Drive area was insufficient to meet the demands of current and future golf course irrigation demand. Additionally, the extremely high costs were a negative factor in the discussion. The Commission concluded that Alternative D was not eligible for selection as the preferred alternative since the costs were projected to be higher than other cost effective opportunities. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 3 The Commission concluded that Alternative C was not eligible for selection as the preferred alternative since the City of Tucson's counterproposal grouped several issues together and clearly left no room for the reclaimed water issue to be discussed separately. The perception was that the counterproposal established a very complex negotiating environment that did not appear to allow for a timely implementation of a reclaimed water delivery system to the golf courses in Oro Valley. The uncertainty of the costs that the City of Tucson would impose on the Town was also a negative factor in the discussion. The Commission concluded that Alternative B was the preferred alternative and most appropriate to pursue at this time. The costs are favorable, the schedule is doable, it accomplishes the goal of removing golf courses from irrigation with groundwater and it provides prompt resolution to the challenge of meeting ADWR's regulatory conservation requirement for the Town. Additionally, it is consistent with the recommendations of the Water Supply Alternatives report. The Commission felt that none of the other three alternatives should be totally removed from the table, but set aside without further devotion of resources at this time. It was acknowledged that if either the cost or schedule for any of the alternatives changed significantly from that discussed, then the preferred alternative status of Alternative B would need to be reevaluated. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of a recommendation to commit staff resources and outside professional resources to pursue in-depth negotiations on a specific alternative is estimated to cost less than $10,000. WATER UTILITY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: In support of the conclusions summarized above, the Commission unanimously approved the following motion on this matter: I move to forward to the Mayor & Council at the forthcoming study session, based on the information available to date, a recommendation that the Town pursue detailed negotiations and research regarding Alternative B on the attached matrix as the best project for implementation in the near term. Further,I move that a response to the City's counterproposal be prepared along the lines that, while the Mayor & Council wish to resolve issues between the City and Town, the complexity of the issues will preclude the Town from achieving such resolution in the near term and that the Mayor & Council must pursue other alternatives available to address the immediate AWR needs of the community. 10-23-1998 2:31PM FROM P. 2 F-96$ T-487 P-002/002 OCT 23 '98 14:10 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 3 OF 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff fully supports the recommendation of the Commission and respectfully requests that, following the study session, staff be given specific direction regarding the preparation of a response to the City of Tucson's counterproposal aud specific direction regarding the resources to allocate to the preferred alternative. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Matrix of Alternatives,dated 10-12-98 2. Commission Communication of 10-12-98 SUGGESTED MOTION: No action is required at this time. Water Utility Director AM I • Eager Imignememmompi.0111111•111.111141.11.14.1 ATTACHMENT 1 10-26-98 Co 1 CD N c z _0 O Q o r- 6 0 0 x � a) U a) 2 a E CI) CI) � (r) LC) E Q W CC CC CC fY o < < < < > ca_ /) W W W W ._ a) TA 0 >- >- >- >- .- 0 0 W LO L) LO LI" lL C I 0 0 0 0 o E4- U I- F- F- F— L d" CO `I' CO C co U CD 0 � (1) t" a) 5. co 0 Q 75 r.1 r- (V CO CL a) C H O O ON ti a) cu U (;e Ff} {a' Ef} co 5 > . co CDW O 0 O O oC � D I— F— I— F— H 0 Q= (I) N O co N- 0 0 O Ln d- O coQD as C co a) U= I-1-1 C-f} 6F} te- 0 a) -- c t� L as 1 z m o 0 L. O p 0p O 0 U 0 Q - Q L ZI— U0 � o III � OU Cn _a) � a) U J IW— H L (,) co 0_ � -V) V) 2 cn 0_ i2 co ,.._ ,_ ,..r 0 W VJ 2 (t) -0 cn •L L 2ry fY 0 W Z � °' o LL W W (n 0 .� E co .� W 0 2 > p U j W Q Q O c, p •— • I, Z J 0 2 o >. (CID) n 0 I"' N 0 0 w Q W G C Q p 0 w 2 J W 00 -0 L Z = W Q U >, � � >, W 0 W 0 cn a - a _ I--- Q W >- U U CZ_1Q U) W W a) 00a) o J W = ow ■� C) Q 11. WT > Z < J < ca) a) c Q Q — L L .- W p O 0 > a) a) a) a) O 0) 0) O) O) Q � � 0 � CCCC CC D X Q Z 0 Q Q co co co co - L L L L J H Z 0 0 7; cn 4c-ii cn — W — 0 0 0 0 I— Q I— o 0000 Q _J Q Q m0 0 0 . • Q Z — NM4 ATTACHMENT 2 10-26-98 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: October 12,1998 TO: WATER UTILITY COMMISSION MEMBERS FROM: David G. Hook Water Utility Director SUBJECT: Alternative Water Resources -Joint Study Session with Mayor & Council SUMMARY: The joint study session with the Mayor & Council on Alternative Water Resource (AWR) issues has been tentatively scheduled for 10-26-98. In preparation for that meeting, staff has done preliminary work on the information and data related to the alternatives available for implementation in the near term. It appears that most of the necessary information is in place to expedite a decision. Staff is bringing forth this memo to present you with the information so that you may consider making a recommendation to the Mayor & Council at the upcoming study session. Utilizing information and data available from recent studies, staff has begun to prepare a matrix summarizing alternatives, with their cost and schedule (please reference Attachment #1). These alternatives are those that can be implemented in the near term and can compliment other alternatives that will be considered for the long term. Staff is endeavoring to analyze the data available on the remaining alternatives so the matrix can be completed. Additional information will be provided at the Commission meeting for your reference. Data was collected from several resources, including the Commission's Water Supply Alternatives For The Town Of Oro Valley And Adjacent Water Service Areas report (a.k.a. the Mcgill report), the Northwest Replenishment Project final report, data and work products from the in-process Southern Arizona Regional Water Management Study, the adopted OVWU master plan, and Pima County. As you may be aware, the Town of Oro Valley ('Town) has previously initiated dialogue with the City of Tucson (City) regarding access to their reclaimed water system (Alternate A on the attached matrix). The initial dialogue led to the Town submitting a proposal to the City on the matter (please reference Attachment #2). After waiting seven months for a response, the Town received a counterproposal that is not very encouraging regarding the possibility of a timely and reasonable agreement with the City (please reference Attachment #3). Their counterproposal clearly binds together all outstanding water issues, including the Northwest Area Agreements. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 3 The Pima County Administrator's office has proposed that, in conjunction with the upcoming Ina Road WWTP improvements, high quality effluent be made available to interested customers (Alternate B on the attached matrix). This effluent would receive tertiary treatment and meet 'open access' standards. Potential customers include the Town of Oro Valley, the Town of Marana and Metro Water. Potential uses included turf irrigation (i.e. golf courses, parks and schools) as well as artificial recharge. Issues involving ownership of effluent can be addressed through several options, including the purchase or lease of effluent allotted to the local Indian nations via SAWARSA. Pima County has prepared a proposal on this alternative (please reference Attachment #4). This alternative does not require resolution of the City issues in order to move forward with implementation in the short term. The Oro Valley reclamation facility, as discussed in the Commission's Water Supply Alternatives report, would place the Town in the reclamation business (Alternative C on the attached matrix). This alternative requires significant capital investment, along with assuming responsibility for the associated O&M of system operation and meeting all regulatory obligations. The utilization of C.A.P. water (Alternative D on the attached matrix) creates a project that is essentially a smaller version of that discussed in the Northwest Replenishment Project report, being sized for only turf demands instead of artificial recharge and turf demand. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of a recommendation to commit staff resources and outside professional resources to pursue in-depth negotiations on a specific alternative is estimated to cost less than $10,000. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff respectfully recommends that the Water Utility Commission forward to the Mayor and Council, at the October 26`h joint study session, a recommendation for a specific project on which further in-depth negations should be pursued. Staff further recommends that the Commission hold a special meeting the week of October 19`'' to conclude discussions on this matter and to take action on a recommended course of action prior to the forthcoming study session. Staff further recommends that the Commission forward to the Mayor & Council a recommendation that a response be provided to the City regarding their counterproposal. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION COMMUNICATION PAGE 3 OF 3 SUGGESTED MOTION: The Commission may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to hold a special Water Utility Commission meeting on October_, 1998 at _PM in order to continue this discussion so that the Commission may arrive at a conclusion on which project to recommend to the Mayor& Council at the upcoming study session. Or I move to forward to the Mayor & Council at the forthcoming study session, based on the information available to date, a recommendation that the Town pursue detailed negotiations and research regarding Alternative # on the attached matrix as the best project for implementation in the near term. Further, I move that a response to the City's counterproposal be prepared along the lines that, while the Mayor 8c Council wish to resolve issues between the City and Town, the complexity of the issues will preclude the Town from achieving such resolution in the near term and that the Mayor & Council must pursue other alternatives available to address the immediate AWR needs of the community. Or I move to ATTACHMENTS: 1. Matrix of Options with Cost and Schedule 2. Town of Oro Valley's proposal to City of Tucson regarding their Reclaimed Water System 3. City of Tucson Counterproposal to Town of Oro Valley's Proposal 4. Pima County's proposal for the Ina Road Reclaimed Water Distribution System op 4. 4L_ • i ity Director ATTACHMENT # 1 1 -' 00 u_ 01 < cc z Q O , g , ,W J 0W I 0 LU J = Z 0 (')(/) � o Z a (03 Q Z (n 2 O OW 0 0 -i a. � w w 1-- 2 1.- Cn 1- U) w o (f) 2 cin Wce o w z > 1-- 1.1i LL1 (/) 0 < FL CC Z � p 0 0 � 2 w � (i) J >- w 0 � (/) 11 0 J j Z a Q Q X < < 0 < ce < Ei --1 z Ce DI- .7C-- LLJ� Q Q Q oo v o ATTACHMENT #2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY/ TUCSON WATER RECLAIMED WATER PROPOSAL per: TUCSON METRO WASTEWATER REUSE ASSESSMENT UPDATE (page 4-4) • $462.00/AC-FT Total Reclaimed Water Revenue • $150.00/AC-FT O&M • $312.00/AC-FT Available for Debt Reduction 20 year bond repayment @ 7% interest (Tucson Water-page 4-3) Provide Service for 2 Golf Courses • 860 AC-FT/year • 860 AC-FT/year x $312.00/AC-FT = $268,320.00/year (available for Debt Reduction) Capital Repayment Potential = $2,840,000.00 Provide Service for four (4) Golf Courses = 1720 AC-FT/Year • 1720 AC-FT/year x$312.00/AC-FT = $536,640.00/year (available for Debt Reduction) Capital Repayment Potential = $5,680,000.00 Provide Service for eight (8) Golf Courses = 3440 AC-FT/year • 3440 AC-FT/year x$312.00/AC-FT = $1,073,280.00/year(available for Debt Reduction) Capital Repayment Potential = $11,370,000.00 LS/WPMF/JOBS/97206-t/ASSESSUPDATE.DOC ATTACHMENT #3 • '• zc� CITY OF TUCSON OFFICE OF THE JulY 17, 1998 CITY MANAGER Mr. Charles Sweet • Town Manager Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. S et:. Thank you for your letter of July 8, 1998 regarding the Town of Oro Valley's interest in purchasing reclaimed water from the City of Tucson. I am, however, perplexed by your assertion that the City has been silent on•this issue. While a formal, written response and counter-proposal has taken some time to prepare, City representatives, myself included, have consistently updated you and other Town officials as to our position regarding this particular issue as well as several other water-related concerns. Indeed, since the summer of 1995, a number of issues concerning water have arisen between the Town of Oro. Valley and the City of Tucson that remain unresolved. I have attempted to delineate the most significant aspects of these issues below. The first issue involved the boundaries of the portion of the Town which is served by MDWID. MDWID filed a lawsuit to resolve the boundary issues it had with the City, and, in early 1996, agreement was reached between MDWID and the City concerning those issues. At that time, attorneys for the City sought to resolve the boundary issues with the Town and were told by the Town's attorneys that, since there were a number of water related issues to be addressed, the boundary issue should be considered in a comprehensive discussion of all of these issues. In early 1996, the Town acquired the water systems of Canada Hills Water Company and Rancho Vistoso Water Company. During the acquisition process, the City advised your counsel that the Northwest Area Agreements between the City and those two water companies provide that their terms are binding upon successors and assigns, CITY HALL P.O.BOX 27210 TUCSON,ARIZONA 85726-7210 PHONE:(520)791-4204 FAX:(520)791-5198 Mr. Chuck Sweet, Town Manager Town of Oro Valley July 17, 1998 Page Two and that the City considered the Town to be bound to those agreements as assignee of the two systems. Representatives of the Town disagreed with the City's position and proposed that this issue be addressed as one of the elements in a comprehensive discussion of all water issues. Meanwhile, the Town has not been remitting development fees to the Cityas required by the two Northwest Area Agreements. p In the summer of 1996, the City sued the Canada Hills Water Company and the Rancho Vistoso Water Company to recover development fees collected by the two companies but not remitted to the City. The lawsuits were resolved by a stipulated judgment which found, on stipulation of both companies and the City, that the Northwest Area Agreements between the companies and the City were in full force and effect at the time the Town bought the water systems. In late 1997 the Town and the City entered into a tolling agreement which provides that delay in enforcing the City's rights under the Northwest Area Agreements will not affect the enforceability of those rights. The tolling agreement can be terminated by either party on 30 days notice. The purpose of the tolling agreement was to give the Town and the City the opportunity for negotiations to resolve these issues. During the past year there have been discussions between the Town and the City concerning the purchase of reclaimed water by the Town. After the Town and City agreed in concept to seek a joint rate study for wholesale deliveries of reclaimed water to the Town, the Town requested, instead, that the City finance the delivery pipeline and sell the reclaimed water at $462 per acre foot and that this proposal be presented to the Mayor and Council of the City. The Town's proposal was presented. The Mayor and Council rejected the proposal and directed staff to initiate negotiations on all of the outstanding water issues. This decision was relayed to you by me immediately following the action of the Mayor and Council. In addition to the Northwest Area Agreements, the boundary issues, and potential purchase/sale of reclaimed water, there are a number of other outstanding water related issues: the Town's purchase of City water facilities, effluent, and CAP entitlement. In an effort to move this important dialogue on water-related issues forward, I suggest the Town and the City enter into comprehensive discussions for the purpose of Mr. Chuck Sweet, Town Manager Town of Oro Valley July 17, 1998 Page Three resolving these issues in a package that takes into account the needs of both parties. To that end, I am enclosing a comprehensive proposal for Town review and consideration. 1 would suggest that discussion of this proposal be scheduled to begin within the next 30 days and will call within the next several days to schedule an initial meeting. I look forward to the initiation of an open and comprehensive dialogue on these issues of importance to our respective communities. Sincerely, John M. Nachbar Deputy City Manager c: Mayor and Council Luis G. Gutierrez, City Manager David Modeer, Director, Tucson Water Bruce Johnson, Lead Administrator, Tucson Water Tom Berning, City Attorney Dennis Rule, Administrator, Tucson Water Mary Cohen, Esq., Saks Tierney • • • CITY OF TUCSON PROPOSAL TO TOWN OF ORO VALLEY The following is a comprehensive proposal to resolve the outstanding water related issues between the City and the Town. This proposal is to be considered as a package, with each of its elements dependent on the other elements. No single element is to be considered as a proposal by itself. The City is not willing to discuss only the issues of concern to Oro Valley; we believe that discussions will be most productive if all outstanding issues are included. The elements of this proposal are as follows: City of Tucson issues: Boundaries of the Town's Water District No. 1 Northwest Area Agreements and CAP allocation Town of Oro Valley issues: Town purchase of City water facilities Reclaimed water 0(g' Effluent Boundaries of the Town's Water District No. 1 A portion of the Town's Water District No. 1 lying south of Hardy Road and east of Northern Avenue is now served water by the City of Tucson. If the Town purchases the City's facilities, the Town will be in a position to supply the water and can work out any boundary adjustment with MDWID. if the Town does not purchase the City system, the boundaries of the Town's Water District No. 1 should be adjusted as proposed by Alan Forrest and Larry Mulhern in their August 1995 report. Most of the suggestions contained in the report were adopted by the City and MDWID when they settled, in 1996, the boundary litigation filed in 1995 by MDWID. A copy of the relevant portion of the report is enclosed. Northwest Area Agreements On May 29, 1979 the City entered into an Agreement for Water Service with Foothills Water Co. (which later became Canada Hills Water Company) and an Agreement for Water Service with Rancho Vistoso Water Company. Under the terms of those agreements, the City.was to provide long term wholesale water supplies for the service areas of those two companies and, as a result, those service areas were deemed to have an assured water supply so that land could be developed. The two water companies were to collect Water Development Fees from new connections and remit them to the • City to be used to pay for the Northwest Water Supply System ("NWSS"). The NWSS consisted of a major water transmission line and a series of reservoirs and booster stations. The City was to develop a water importation system which consisted of CAP water, a treatment plant and water from Avra Valley. The cost of the water importation system was to be recovered as part of the wholesale water rate when the City began water deliveries to the two companies. The two companies were obligated to start taking water from the City when the City was in a position to begin deliveries. The City contracted for CAP water, constructed a .CAP water treatment plant and constructed the first segments of the NWSS, including the Oasis Reservoir and a 42" line to the Oasis Reservoir. In May, 1994 the Tucson voters approved a bond issue which included money earmarked for construction of the remainder of the NWSS to bring Tucson water to the service areas of the two companies. In the summer of 1994, the two companies suggested to the City that construction of the remainder of the NWSS be delayed while the two companies and MDWID investigated the potential for using CAP recharge and recovery as an alternative to the City's direct delivery of imported water. The City agreed to delay the resumption of construction of the NWSS for at least two years while recharge feasibility studies were completed. On May 1, 1996 the Town purchased the water systems of the two companies. Both Northwest Water Agreements provide that: "This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefits of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto." A dispute between the two water companies over Water Development Fees collected was, resolved by stipulated judgments in which the fees were divided between the City and the companies in accordance with the terms of the Agreements. Under the terms of the Agreements a Water Development Fee of $188 for each new water connection should have been collected by the Town after May 1, 1996 and remitted every 45 days to the City. That has not been done. Sufficient time has elapsed since the summer of 1994 for the completion of recharge feasibility studies. The City is willing to discuss with the Town the initiation of the delivery of CAP water to the Town by means of recharge and recovery. In any such arrangement, the price of the water would have to be calculated in accordance with the terms of the Agreements and would include elements to assure recovery by the City of a pro rata share of the costs of the CAP importation system. If the Town wants the City to complete the NWSS in accordance with the Agreements, the City is prepared to do so. If the Town wants to be released from its obligations under the Northwest Area Agreements, the City is willing to consider such a release if agreement can be reached on appropriate compensation to the City and its water rate payers for the loss of the Town's contributions to the payment of overhead costs and of the costs of the CAP importation system, including the treatment plant. As you know, the City's claims for loss of revenue in connection with the Metropolitan Water Co.'s Northwest Area Agreement were settled in the MDWID litigation. In the context of an overall settlement in which the Town is released from the Northwest Area Agreements and the City receives reasonable compensation for the loss of revenue stream, the City is prepared to consider transferring to the Town the portion of the City's 2 CAP entitlement which is attributable to the former service area of Rancho Vistoso-- approximately 2,000 acre feet. Town Purchase of City Water Facilities More than a year ago, the Town advised that it wanted to purchase the City water g delivery system within the Town limits. The City agreed to engage a qualified utility appraiser to determine the value of that system. The water delivery facilities within the Town areP art of an integrated system that extends south of Magee Road and west nearly to La Canada.' It is connected to the rest of the City's water system at First Avenue and Magee Road. In addition, the City owns and operates an isolated water production and delivery system at the town of Catalina north of Oro Valley. The City had anticipated that it would be serving water wholesale to the service area of Metropolitan Water Co., Canada Hills Water Co. and Rancho Vistoso Water Co. under the terms of the Northwest • Area Agreements, and that its water delivery system would be extended on to Catalina. In the current context, if the Town of Oro Valley wants to acquire the portion of the City's retail water distribution system that lies within the Town's boundaries, the City is willing to sell the entire integrated system, including the portion which south of the Town boundaries, west to Wanda Avenue and south of Magee Road (see the enclosed map), together with the Catalina system at the value set by the appraiser, Harold Morgan of Bookman Edmonston. Enclosed is a copy of Mr. Morgan's valuation letter in which he concludes that the value of the water systems within and outside the Town, and at Catalina as a unit is $4,600,000. Reclaimed Water More than ag ear a 'o, the Town asked the City to sell the Town reclaimed water for use Y on the golf courses in the Town. Town and City staff met to discuss a process for establishing the potential terms for such a sale. It was agreed that the Town and the City would enter into an 1GA to finance a rate study to determine the appropriate wholesale rate for reclaimed water sold by the City to the Town. The City prepared a draft IGA and sent it to the Town. The Town responded by making a new proposal. That proposal would call for the City to finance a 24" reclaimed water main from the City's existing reclaimed water line to a reservoir in Oro Valley and to sell the reclaimed water to Oro Valley at $462 per acre foot. As you know, the City currently sells reclaimed water to customers within its service area for $462 per acre foot. Studies indicate that this price is less than the fully allocated cost of service and is justified based on benefits to the Tucson Water service area—benefits that are not received from wholesale sales to water providers outside the City's service area. The Mayor and Council have been unwilling to extend this below cost rate to any customers outside the City's service area. 3 request, • • we havepresented your Wholesale Reclaimed Water Proposal to the At your Mayor and Council. They have instructed us to propose to the Town, as part of a comprehensive proposal to address all outstanding water issues, that the original p � agreement for a joint rate study for whplesaie 'reclaimed water sale be pursued. Consequently, we propose that the Town and the City enter into the IGA which we sent to you last fall and proceed with the joint rate study in accordance with the IGA. Effluent The Town has indicated its interest in acquiring from the City the effluent which is derived from water delivered by the Town. As you know, the Arizona Supreme Court in the Long decision held that effluent belongs to the entity that processes the wastewater, not to the entity that produces and delivers the water to customers. Prior to 1979, two metropolitan wastewater treatment facilities produced effluent in the Tucson area--the City's Roger Road plant and the County's Ina Road plant. In 1979 the City and the County entered into an IGA under the terms of which the City transferred to the County the Roger Road plant and its wastewater collection system, the City retained the effluent from that plant, and the County transferred to the City the effluent from the Ina Road plant. The IGA allowed the County access to 10% of the effluent for defined County uses. In the Southern Arizona Water Rights Settlement Act of 1982, one condition of the resolution of the water rights claims of the then Papago Tribe (now Tohono O'odham Nation) was the City's agreement to make available for the Secretary of the Interior 28,200 acre feet of effluent treated to secondary standards. The City and the Secretary entered into the agreement; the 28,200 acre feet was taken pro-rata from the City's effluent and the County's share. The Secretary is to use his effluent as a resource to procure and deliver to the Nation 28,200 acre feet of water suitable for agricultural use. The Secretary is seeking revenue from the effluent to pay the costs of acquiring and delivering water, probably CAP water, to the Nation. The City has developed a reclaimed water system to filter and disinfect effluent and deliver the water for open access turf irrigation. Currently the City and the Secretary of the Interior are applying to the ADWR to establish a managed storage project in the Santa Cruz River for effluent discharged from the Roger Road treatment plant. Under Arizona law, if the project is permitted, storage credits will be allowed for 50% of the effluent flow. The City and the Secretary have agreed to divide equally between them the storage credits received. The City's IGA with the Secretary contemplates applying for a similar joint project for effluent from the Ina Road plant. The City is also interested in the potential for constructed recharge of the effluent which would result in 100% storage credits. The effluent is an asset of the City; the City cannot make this asset available to others unless some benefit is received by the City. In this context, the City is willing to consider an arrangement with the Town in which the Town would have access to a portion of the City's effluent, based on the quantity of effluent produced from Oro Valley water adjusted 4 for the Secretary's 28,200 acre feet. To assure that the City received benefits, an prorata ry g a reement for such effluent access would provide for the Town's participation and cost sharing in effluent storage projects to the benefit of both the City and the Town. We are sha g g prepared to discuss such an arrangement. 5 . • RESERVOIR r;'+• • SITE •d': •,` LEGEND -• • ••::: ' : .. CORONADO NAT'L. FOREST •••••.•.'•••••••••'. • •; ORO VALLEY TOWN LIMITS n mu mu m - .' ORO VALLEY WATER DISTRICT tnmuu�si Z• ' ' METRO WATER DISTRICT IN on"""" ,i•' i REGULATOR .. , WELL © TUCSON WATER SYSTEM INSIDE % j TOWN OF ORO VALLEY • "C' ZONE PIPE ' , ' TUCSON WATER SYSTEM OUTSIDE D ,•.' ,.. D ZONE PIPE OF ORO VALLEY C •. , 'E" ZONE PIPE , , G "F" ZONE PIPE . •C-113® ' ' ,•'' �. . W AT E R . ......./„..-$ ., . ii. ........„.,.. 14, d-3\-) • . e - INVEST"NO tN OUR COMMUNITY .,''S,' .,.• * , .:;..;; :,', :is .;'. • .,'•,..• •,• ` UPDATED 20 APR Oe r ♦'♦•''.• '... cA ./'/../ t ' a•••... . . . ,-./.., ••• . . .... . . • • . . . • . ... ................ ,. - ••• . • • ... .............• a-..-.- . •-•-•,••-..%•' 1:,-. (--- Il' - i� I ;` 't i 71;� ! ir liIt -7\,/ ♦• l�l a. . 4/ d �i•• V 14 ../ .. . ., .•• . • . ., ,. . ,• .,. .. . .•• • ,. • • e. . ... - . a . . ••••...••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• uNDA VISTA eLVD -•• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••• . i ....-. • • . • l'.. . . FOREST I • ••••' • • • J Cif R �y�p�{� / / �i:�j ' '•i. ..i .,�.• C. /,,,,1:, r /. /•' / ..•. 1: :• - �l/i•/I/I/Ilii/ di., �:?; i •:�' • :ii •.•:• Q ��/////l>��/lam���j �•'% .! •• O 0 i//,"„ 4/,//Pr./A •'fir ..r./ //,/,-.',4> •/� G�4,,,'�/// .. kir _ . • . • ,,,. ,, ,,,,,A,A, 7 .. F -, PI VII PR VI VI ", / r--, .,,A A Ai ' ./i,„,,,d ,4-. ,/,, ,v.a 6 , -i' ///� ��' I :lam / .... A 11 , ;:yii�itv�J SII v../� //,�,���%„dep./. ..•.• � • 4 a . ri. / 1, ;„ ,;, ; ,ir - ; /n / /'. 4. 0 e 'w n 1!`f. 74. t. GUANO CO�tTARO � �. • 4.. 11 ••••-• < • 8 6 6 6 • PROPOSED POINT OF R a0 , II • + • SY'STEI�I SEPARATION ) . R — ii. ,,-- /�..1! GOO'S• DR. I is i0 4 - 4" ROAD p .•,••• J A ♦ • 6 , w 8 6 s N t 8 ... .R d',6Apill 8 ,� ••• t » . Idill n At:" 8*All 12" 6 _ 12" .. tO ,)2 12" • 041441/11gu. ' lo •.-.••• . ' ' Tn nrn. nwAAnnr% ._. 6 2 ' y�► GEE M N co 7 3 I " 1 N N - . i . -; . * .—I. •... ' 41? 1 47 • • . a nnenr ' . ,13 t . i , lli . • • r pES1ER 6 a `t �° 4. 3 4tArill / co Wong. naQ�ww� 3 R� ' , -p t 1 CAVI P+nn nnr j �I.!! nwr• i I.M.ra Ott 1 01 / , . �, A BOOKMAN-EDMONSTON ENGINEERING , INC . • Specialists in Water Resources • CONFIDENTIAL June 10, 1998 • Marvin S. Cohen,Esq. Sacks Tierney,P.A. 2929 North Central Avenue Fourteenth Floor Phoenix,AZ 85012-2742 • Subject: Opinion of Fair Market Value of City of Tucson Water Systems (Oro Valley) Dear Mr. Cohen: • In accordance with your authorization, we have completed a review of data supporting an opinion of fair market value of the water systems owned by the City of Tucson (Tucson) contemplated for potential transfer to the Town of Oro Valley (Oro Valley). These systems include facilities serving customers within Oro Valley (623 connections), customers within Tucson adjacent to the Oro Valley. system (751 connections), and customers within the Town of Catalina (367 connections). As used in this letter, fair market value is defined as the highest price in terms of money which a water system would bring if exposed for sale on the open market by a seller who is willing but not under compulsion to sell,with a reasonable time allowed to find a buyer who is willing but not obligated to buy, with both parties having full knowledge of the uses,purposes,limitations,and risks involved. Based upon our review and analysis of City records, field visits to the service areas to observe facility condition and service area characteristics, and review of sales of selected water utilities in Arizona which have recently changed ownership,. it is our opinion that the combined fair market value of the these systems as of December 31, 1997 is $4,600,000. The following sections discuss in greater detail the basis for this opinion. It should be pointed out that the opinion of value does not include such items as materials and supplies, working funds, receivables or other current assets. In addition, the buyer would pay the City for the cost of physical severance for isolating the existing facilities and service areas contiguous to the Tucson system. If all three systems are transferred, it is estimated the cost of severance would not exceed $2500. 225 W.BROADWAY,SurrE 400.GLENDALE,CA 91204-1331•(818)244-0117•FAx(818)242-0480 BAKuPsnan,CA GLENDALE.CA Owl,UI' PHOENIX.AZ Pou w0.OR SACIIAMFNTO.CA Marvin S.Cohen,Esq. • June 10,1998 Page 2 • System separationproposed is at a 12-inch main along Magee Road justeast of First Avenue. Finally, the opinion inion of value expressed in this letter is associated with the sale of three Tucson systems containing about 1,741 connections. If the sale involves fewer t or considerablyfewer connections, the premium over historic depreciated cost systems associated with the opinion of value would be higher than expressed in this letter. DATE OF VALUE order to derive a reliable opinion of fair market value, it was necessary to establish In P estimate of the utility lant value as of the date of value. Accordingly, an P December 31,1997 was the latest date for which records were available to obtain necessary data and, therefore,was selected as the date of value. • DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS The facilities associated with this opinion of value make up three systems owned by Tucson Water. These systems provide water to associated service areas including: an area within the Town of Oro Valley, an area outside of,but adjacent to the Oro Valley system, and the service area associated with the community of Catalina. Maps presenting these systems and associated service areas, together with well sites and PP .. pipelines, are attached to this letter. Water supplies for the service areas within and adjacent to the Town of Oro Valley would have to be developed from existing wells, delivered through the Metro Water District system, purchased wholesale from Tucson, or imported from another source. Table 1 presents the connection classification counts for each of the three service areas. Those facilities within Oro Valley provide water service to an approximately square area lying at the southern boundary of the town limits, generally bounded on the north by Calle Concordia, on the west by Northern Avenue (which extends as Calle Buena Vista), and on the east and south by the Oro Valley town limits (which southern boundary generally follows Camino Cortaro and Catalina Shadows Boulevard, and Y eastern boundary defined by an extended North First Avenue). Within this service area, there are 623 connections, most of which are residential. In addition to distribution mains, ranging generally in diameter sizes from 3 to 12 inches, there are four well sites (C-97, C-98, C-99A and B, and C-113) containing five wells with depths rangingfrom 460 to 1,000 feet and diameters varying from 12 to 16 inches. The system C-99A also contains two h dropneumatic tanks (1,200 and 3,000 gallons). Only well Y currently contains pumping equipment. Please note that well No. C-113 is located outside of the service area north of Canada Del Oro Wash just west of North First Avenue. • • • Marvin S. Cohen, Esq. June 10, 1998 Page 3 TABLE 1 • NUMBER AND TYPE OF CONNECTIONS IN THE TUCSON SERVICE AREAS Type _ Service Areas _ Of Oro Valley Adjacent to Oro Valley Catalina • Connections Number of Connections • Commercial 11 80 37 Construction 0 1 0 . • Mull-family 26 45 4(1) Residential 586 625 326 Total • 623 751 367 (a) Includes duplex/triplex. The service area lying adjacent to the system within Oro Valley is integrated into the latter service area. Accordingly, it is believed both systems should be sold together as an operating unit. This adjacent system contains 751 connections of which about 90 percent are residential. The irregular shaped service area is bounded on the south and west by Metro Water District boundaries, on the north by the Town of Oro Valley and Metro Water District, and on the east by an extension of North First Avenue. As mentioned earlier, physical severance would be accomplished with the adjoining Tucson system just east of First Avenue along Magee Road (which severance point is also shown on the attached map). Distribution mains generally range from 3 to 12 inches in diameter, and three well sites (C-92, C-93 and C-94) are included ranging in depth from 440 to 715 feet and in diameters from 8 to 12 inches. The Catalina system contains an estimated 367 connections, of which approximately 90 percent are residential. Main sizes range from 1 to 12 inches in diameter. There are also three sites containing three wells (8 to 16 inches in diameter) which range in depth from about 400 to 780 feet. Each well site is equipped, and one site includes booster pumping equipment. Six pressure and storage tanks range in size from 2,000 to 170,000 gallons. The Catalina service area.is based on a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity which Tucson acquired when it purchased the Vistas Las Catalina Water Company, a PUC regulated utility, in 1973. The certificate defines a service area of about seven and one-half square miles (the NW 1/4 and the W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 4, all of Section 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 18, the N 1/2 of Section 20, and the N 1/2 of Section 19, Township 11 South,Range 14 East,G. &S.RB. &M.,Pima County,Arizona). ORIGINAL COST NEW LESS DEPRECIATION • The original cost new (OCN) of"water system facilities is a measure of the original investmentSm and a parameter used for ratemaking. Deducting an allowance for depreciation to account for the facilities being less than new results in an estimate of the original cost new less depreciation (OCNLD). This economic parameter is utilized in the market place to determine a utility sales price. • Marvin S.Cohen,Esq. June 10,1998 • Page 4 The inventory of facilities'ties and the associated original costs were supplied by Tucson staff based on records research. A field visit was made to each system to photograph facilities, review condition and observe service area characteristics. Operating personnel carefully checked historic records with facilities in the field. Depredation allowances for individual facilities or groups of facilities, were made by B-E based on industry published data and experience gained over many years of performing similar studies. Table 2 presents the OCNLD of the three Tucson systems, as of December 31, 1997. As shown,the total OCNLD for the three systems is approximately$2,796,000. TABLE 2 ESTIMATES OF OCNLD FOR TUCSON WATER SYSTEMS System OCN Depreciation OCNLD Facilities within Oro Valley $1,101,431 $446,328 $655,103 Facilities adjacent to Oro Valley 1,907,528 380,318 1,527,210 Catalina 859,722 242,114 617,608 TOTAL $3,868,681 $1,068,760 $2,799,921 WATER UTILITY SALES A comparable sale is a sale of property, the price of which will shed light on the value of the property being appraised. The specific utility sales considered in this analysis are those meeting the following criteria: > Sales representing arm's length transactions; > Sales which were limited to utility property (i.e., the sale did not include significant other non-utility property); > Sales to public agencies taking place under normal market conditions (i.e.;not an award by a court in an eminent domain proceeding); ➢ Sales which did not involve any other special circumstances which would cast a doubt on their validity as an indication of what would happen in a normal market transaction. Our research revealed that five Arizona water systems (with one sale including a wastewater system) have been sold between 1993 to date, which can be considered comparable to the Tucson water systems. These sales are presented on the following Table 3. For each sale, Table 3 identifies the system, the purchaser, the year of the sale, the depreciated original cost of the utility plant and the premium over OCNLD expressed both in terms of dollars and percentage of OCNLD. As shown, the utility plant OCNLD involved in the sales has varied from $254,000 to $8,547,000. Prices paid have varied from a premium of 43 to 95 percent over OCNLD. • Marvin S.Cohen, Esq. June 10, 1998 Page 5 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF DATA ON SALES OF ARIZONA WATER SYSTEMS System Purchaser Year OCNLD Premium Amount Percent Arizona Sierra Utility Company' Town of Florence 1993 $1,432,000 $615,000 43 Apache Junction System of Water Utilities 1995 2,985,000 1,295,000 2 43 Consolidated Water Utilities Community Facilities District Canada Hills Water Company Town of Oro Valley 1996 8,547,000 4,453,000 52 Rancho Vistoso Water Company ,Town of Oro Valley 1996 5,391,000 5,109,000 95 Tankersley Water Company ATown of Gilbert 1996 254,000 146,000 57 1. Includes wastewater system. 2- Premium is based on estimated cash equivalent price. Each of the sales was thoroughly investigated including, as available, a review of all sales records, rate case proceedings, system records, field visits, and interviews with operating and negotiating parties. Therefore, the highest price anticipated to be paid in the utility marketplace for the Tucson water systems,considering the analyses on comparable sales, is estimated to be at an amount representing a premium of approximately 50 percent over the total of the three system OCNLD amounts. Accordingly, the utility market price is estimated to be $4,200,000. REPRODUCTION COST NEW LESS DEPRECIATION The reproduction cost new less depreciation (RCNLD) method of valuation, also known as the cost approach,is based on an estimate of the current cost of construction for the physical facilities of the water system, less the estimated actual depreciation to account for the facilities being less than new. Additionally, separate amounts are • added for the current market value of land, land rights, and the estimated current cost • of intangible assets (such as organization costs). The cost of reproducing the facilities of the three systems was estimated at price levels which prevailed at the end of 1997. An estimate of the reproduction cost new (RCN) was made by B-E utilizing the Handy-Whitman cost index for utility sy stem construction. Original costs of construction for individual facilities, or groups of facilities,were indexed to current construction costs levels. Land values were included at current appraised values supplied by City staff or appraisal contractors. The amount of accrued depreciation was estimated by the straight-line method. Expected original and remaining service lives were based on judgment, given consideration to data from several sources and experience gained by B-E in performing many RCNLD studies. Marvin S.Cohen, Esq. June 10, 1998 Page 6 Table 4P resents the estimated RCN, depreciation and RCNLD, as of December 31, 1997 for the three Tucson water systems. Also, in accordance with this approach, a value factor is usually applied for going concern value. If a 5 percent allowance is added for going concern, the RCNLD for the three systems would be closer to an amount of$6.3 million. TABLE 4 ESTIMATES OF RCNLD FOR TUCSON WATER SYSTEMS System RCN Depreciation RCNLD Facilities within Oro Valley . • $3,638,544 $1,535,753 $2,102,791 rFacilities adjacent to Oro Valley 4,099,793 1,215,180 2,884,613 Catalina 1,488,107 468,983 1,019,124 TOTAL $9,226,444 $3,219,916 $6,006,528 The estimate of reproduction cost new less depreciation was considered but given less weight in forming the opinion of fair market value. The facilities, including land and easement rights, are now dedicated to public use and, if purchased by a non-public buyer, would be under the regulatory jurisdiction of the Arizona Corporation Commission. A knowledgeable buyer of these facilities would recognize that earnings would be controlled by the Commission at a level which would represent a fair rate of return on the established rate base(typically an average of the depreciated original cost and RCNLD), and that the Commission would not allow it sufficient earnings to justify a price equal to or exceeding the RCNLD. As for a public agency buyer, our investigations of comparable sales data indicate that RCNLD is not the primary determinant of sales price. INCIDENTAL VALUE In addition to the normal standby and commodity revenues associated with these three systems, there are additional incidental revenues which Tucson would lose if these systems are transferred to a new owner. These revenue streams include Central Arizona Project charges and City business privilege tax revenues. Capitalization of these revenue streams indicates an incidental value of $400,000. It is considered that Tucson would suffer an economic.loss of this amount as a result of the transfer of these systems without sale compensation. Therefore, this amount is added to the opinion of value as incidental value. OPINION OF VALUE In.arriving at my opinion of value, we used or considered traditional approaches to value: the market approach and the cost approach. Under the market approach, an investigation was made of the sales of other properties similar to that being valued and the results were property.extrapolatedl to the subject Under the cost approach, consideration was made both of the cost of reproducing the property, with suitable adjustment for depreciation to reflect that the property being valued is not new, and I • • • • • Marvin S. Cohen, Esq. June 10, 1998 Page 7 the original cost invested to construct the systems less theappropriate a Ydjustments for l depreciation. We looked at all of these measures of value and took into account a number of factors including service area characteristics, number of connections, gross revenues, system condition, RCNLD and OCNLD. We also considered special circumstances concerning these systems which might have an influence on value (including service problems, system condition and design, and other factors). On the basis of this information and our experience and knowledge, we then, by judgment, formed an opinion as to the fair market value. Therefore, based on the above-described investigation, it is our opinion that the fair market value of. the water system facilities of the Tucson water systems, includin g land, land rights, operating rights, goodwill, and incidental value, as of December 31, 1997 is$4,600,000. ALLOCATION OF VALUE • For your information, it is possible to allocate the opinion of value to each of the three service areas. It should be emphasized that the following allocation analysis does not contain opinions of value based on separate appraisals. Based on Arizona utility sales, it is our opinion that sales of systems smaller than the total of these three combined systems may result in higher premiums. For example, focusing on the. Oro Valley system alone with a separate appraisal may (and likely would) result in a higher value than expressed in this letter. As with performing the overall system valuation, we believe a number of factors should be taken into account in order to allocate including service area characteristics, number of connections, gross revenues, system condition, RCNLD and OCNLD. The following table presents the percentage allocations for each of the three systems by some of these quantitative parameters. The qualitative factors (such as service area characteristics)have also been taken into account by judgement. TABLE 5 RELATIVE PERCENTAGES OF SIGNIFICANT QUANTITATIVE FACTORS FOR TUCSON WATER SYSTEMS S stem Connections Gross Revenues 00) OCNLD RCNLD Y - - - Number Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Facilities Within Oro Valley 623 36 $258,443 34 $655,103 23 $2,102,791 35 Facilities Adjacent to Oro Valley 751 43 419,597 55 1,527,210 55 2,884,613 48 Catalina 367 21 85,436 11 617,608 22 1,019,124 17 Total 1,741 S763,476 $2,799,921 $6,006,528 (a) Based on estimated 1998 operating results. • Marvin S.Cohen, Esq. June 10, 1998 Page 8 Based on ajudgmental assessment of the above referenced information, it is our opinion that percentage allocations to apply to the overall appraisal opinion would be 35, 50 and 15P P ercent respectively, for Facilities Within Oro Valley, Facilities Adjacent to Oro Valley, and Catalina. These result in separate allocations for the three identified systems of $1.47 million, $2.1 million and $630,000. Adding the estimated incidental values brings these overall system allocations to $1.6 million, $2.325 million and Table6 presents these detailed results by individual system. $675,000. TABLE 6 ALLOCATIONS FOR SEPARATE TUCSON WATER SYSTEMS Sy stem Percent of Separate Allocations Incidental Value Total Allocation t't Appraised Value i Facilities Within Oro Valley 35 $1,470,000 , $135,000 $1,605,000 Facilities Adjacent to Oro 50 2,100,000 220,000 2,320,000 Valley . Catalina 15 630,000 45,000 675,000 1 (a) Before rounding to final estimate. It should be noted that the separate system premiums resulting from allocations to OCNLD amounts are 144, 52, and 9 percent respectively. Although the 144 percent premium resulting from the Oro Valley Facilities allocation appears to be considerably higher than the Sales Data Analysis of Arizona Water Systems (presented in Table 3 of the letter dated May 18, 1998), a specific comparison with the details of the Tankersley system sale indicates this premium is not excessive. The Tankersley system is the smallest system sale on the referenced Table 3 and is closest in size to the Oro Valley g system with regard to OCNLD. Table 3 indicates this sale occurred at a premium of 57P ercent over OCNLD calculated consistently with the analyses of the other system sales. The Town of Gilbert agreed to pay $400,000 for the system which records dosest to the date of sale indicated a corresponding OCNLD of $254,000. However, file records obtained from the Town indicated the Town's knowledge at the time of negotiation was that the OCNLD (based on a 1993 Annual Report to the Arizona Corporation Commission) amounted to $153,621, and the RCNLD was $650,322. Based rP on an assumed OCNLD of $160,000 for. 1994 and an estimated RCNLD of facilities to be acquired at$573,000, the'Town agreed on a price of$400,000 (noting the midpoint of the OCNLD and RCNLD values at $366,500). Accordingly, the Town believed it was paying a in $400,000 for an estimated OCNLD of $160,000, amounting to a premium of 150 percent. Therefore, the Oro Valley allocation amounting to a 144 percent premium is considered within, and not outside of, the range of market sale data. However, if the Oro Valleysystem alone sold, it should be noted that physical initial costs would be higher. Preliminary estimates are that physical severance would cost on the order of $10,500 based on a series of eight cuts along the town's boundaries. The details of this severance plan are presented in the Marvin S. Cohen, Esq. r • June 10, 1998 • Page 9 memorandum dated February 13, 1998 from Larry Mulhern of the Tucson Water Department staff. Finally, it should be again noted that separate appraisals of these systems would likely be higher in total amount than the derived allocations. Sincerely, • Harold V. Morgan Executive Principal Engineer K\hvaitemnp 1Tuoonap3.doc(8540.02)nc RESERVOIRy? • SITE ,,.• LEGEND , . ; . . , CORONADO NAT'L, FOREST ,•.•.•.......•.•.•.•. / ORO VALLEY TOWN LIMITS ormolu ' - ORO VALLEY WATER DISTRICT i"nn"i"1 j.J Z / / / / METRO WATER DISTRICT No..'Pm" -• / .4 / /. REGULATOR _a ' ' TUCSON WATER SYSTEM INSIDE % CIS /./ /''' WELL ® TOWN OF ORO VALLEY � ; ./• /•' . • "C" ZONE PIPE ' / / TUCSON WATER SYSTEM OUTSIDE D - \'e "D" ZONE PIPE OF ORO VALLEY C ' / c "E" ZONE PIPE ' , \' "F" ZONE PIPE .C-113® .' / cL / ' Q . (<\/ C WATER 's� G ... I' INVESTING IN OUR COMMUNITY •� ,'. � •••• 11191111"41,411"PirIN ..,*.,• ..,. et, \'\ N.......: . UPDATED 20 APR OR / ,• ,•. �A v.. . /•,''� . • •.• ,,..., a-:.:.: .,.-..,:.----..-......-2.•-• ,.. N:•:•:- i \ '.1-. -7. ,k, -1,- 'T -11----1 -7, -7- . ... •.• ,..---,..---;..• iti T,' III , .,........,......._......._,.., t1i•,......„,E). . ',-- ) 1 , __. 11-1__ Av,. .:-.. • .,,. )'..'.., „ ..• , (-,• ..., . . .„. a:::::: . • ., ... r./ .••••••.•••.•••••••••••••.•.••••••••••••••-•••..•••••••••••••••••. UNQA VISTA BLVD 11 . . a ...... FOREST __. -.; ,'. )_ a - ....-. . n 1 ..•••• to a 11 •••... .' .. . : ....:.: . , ...,. a . .., e .i CALLE CONCORDIA i • • * r ,47. ;,e-A�IAy Zir AViiA ,s -1 . 1;!,/0// i � : 4/40 Q •.-,. h. / , ,k4 4.1 .6' 4 ::: Z .` a ii./. .0'./ / ---, N •' 34-.,,,, "'AI, /11 ... ........ . - ,4 ////. ///,,,p��/�/A ifi,//I/ . HARDY Rosa - l•4 ti ,_���, .. O I _ i11 -)� :::Ai4 r//.%�////�(/'a ......... <z . ',..•!.4)11 1 )4 v 17 './ ,/1' „'a ./ - 0 • ,N . -,/.,/,,v, , ,,;i a - _./3 - 4 g 1. , 1, ,,/,', -./i,F/ ' ,. . a`" .,- /a ••• o . , ,„„,„ ,, 6- 1:.. ‘. , ,,,-,,lo nnwwnw sr. C 0 CORTAROA . ,.".".,,,,,,, r .. I 'ili • (5� • A ,, ,., ,, e4: :::::: o ... . . .-1 ... . • w 6" 8" 8» t° 6 " 6 4 • PROPOSED POINT OF III 1D °O : k .+ it SYSTEM SEPARATION • lo cn c0 4 M .•. Js Cp°' 6 OR. is tD 4" ROAD -•.•' '<" / i~ " 8" 12" 6 co 12" tD 12" 12'' :::' 1 LI., 44.141/16 ' Taal/ n nnnntwn� . ® 0 °� °otZ N tR co --- 3 " • `N_), 84' 'V_ i - P *to E ,i;. 6..--3 tb. . N� 6.. v A 6 w r �2 .- "PI 0 Jhrnn� ',-i.. Si /-------) \.'' 'kir-DCER-iE3; 61b L l't1 . i i `cz' Ai .z. A t —. Ci / / . +IwPIn�i n44PIwi�4» 3 If v / ro i- l 1 �©94 9,ir • - 1 ^n IR PI AM PT--;PI �nnnnh I / / U /.1- - - MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CHUCK SWEET, TOWN MANAGER DATE: July 21, 1998 SUBJ. City • of Tucson Comprehensive Response - Water Issues the Cityof Tucson comprehensive counterproposal regarding water Attached is Y issues with Oro Valley. This comprehensive counterproposal is Tucson's reclaimed water purchase proposal that Oro Valley presented to response to the Mayor Miller and Tucson staff in December 1997. Based upon the numerous complex water issues which are identified in the attached information, it is my suggestion estion that a separate Special Meeting (Executive Session) be scheduled in the near future to discuss the contents of the attached. Tentatively, I am suggesting a 7 PM meeting on Monday, August 3rd. Please let me know if this date and time will work for you. If you would like to discuss details of the attached information prior to a Town Council please meeting, lease do not hesitate to contact my office. Thank you. dIP IL CHUC SWEET TOWN MANAGER Attachments— (4) C: David Hook, Town Engineer Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney ATTACHMENT #4 18-23-1998 2:58PM FROM P. 2 4;05stEr:,* ;.; 0 4 4995 • COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE PIMA COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL CENTER 130 W.CONGRESS,TUCSON,AZ 85701-1317 (520)740-8661 FAX(520)740-8171 • C.1-1-HUCKELBERRy County Administrator September 3, 1998 Chuck Sweet, Manager Town of Oro Valley 11 000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Re: Scope of Work for Construction of a Reclaimed Water Distribution System from the Ina Road Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Dear Mr. S ee • Enclosed please find a scope of work prepared by the'Wastewater Management Department regarding the possibility of constructing a reclaimed water distribution system from the Ina Road Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. Please review the scope of work and provide comments directly to Mr. George Brinsko, the County's Wastewater Management Director. We will be using one of our existing on-call annual consultants. The entire study contract requires the project to be complete within 60 days from notice to proceed. I am also asking each of you to sit on a management oversight committee that will consist of you, Mike Hein, Mark Stratton, David Furrey, George Brinsko, and myself. 1 would anticipate that we will meet with the selected consultant at various points throughout the study. Sincerely, C.H.C. ar.A66667 Huckeiberry County Administrator CHH/jj Attachment c: Gieorge Brinsko, Wastewater Management Director 18-23-1998 2-59PM FROM P. 3 • D EA\ TVIJ Pima County Wastewater Management Department Ina Road Reclaimed Water Distribution System SCOPE OF WORK There is interest in establishing a cooperative joint venture between Pima County, the Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District, the flowing Wells Irrigation District, and the Towns of Oro Valley and Marana to develop a reclaimed water distribution system. Conceptually, the system would emanate from the Ina Road WPCF and serve �, three general areas: the Canada del Oro valley, areas along the Santa Cruz River within the Town of Marana, and select areas along the Rillito Creek from 1-10 to the vicinity of the Craycroft Road alignment. The work to be accomplished, in general terms, is to conduct a feasibility study for a distribution system to convey approximately 20,000 acre-feet per year of Ina Road WPCF effluent through the proposed system to the various reuse points. The object of the work is to create a system which will accommodate 20,000 acre-feet per year of reclaimed water; either through delivery to the various present and future reuse points, or a proposed recharge facility, or a combination thereof. For planning purposes, only, the scope assumes that the cooperators, the Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District, the Flowing Wells Irrigation District, and the Towns of Oro Valley and Marana, will be able to obtain agreements and/or releases from the City of Tucson to utilize effluent generated within their service area boundaries. If such a release is not obtained, the distribution system will primarily be for County owned and/or controlled effluent, which is estimated to be approximately 7,000 acre feet per year. The work should consider what modifications will be needed to the system if the only available effluent is that owned and controlled by the County, or 7,000 acre feet per year. The work to be accomplished under this contract shall be complete within sixty (60) days from Notice to Proceed. The work is to culminate in the publication of a Routing Study, Rate Study and Preliminary Design Report for the proposed Ina Road Reclaimed Water Distribution System. The Routing Study, Rate Study and Preliminary Design Report would be expected to address the following elements: 1. Identify and list: a. The potential customers of the reclaimed water for each of the above noted three general service areas, b. The quantity of water and the seasonal variation in the quantity of water throughout the year that each customer would potentially use, and c. The quality of water each customer would require. 2. Investigate and propose the best available and useable route and the size of a delivery system to serve each general service area from a "base" or "primary" pump station located in the vicinity of—if not on the Ina Road WPCF proper. As part of this investigation, consider three alternatives for proposed routes: a. The use of existing public roadway rights-of-way as one alternative, versus 10-23-1998 2:59PM FROM P- 4 • • Scope of Work II C I C7 Ina Road Reclaimed Water Distribution System b. The use of existing, available public sewer and utility easements along Santa Cruz River, the CDO and the Rillito Creek as a second alternative, versus c. The use of existing public rights-of-way (i.e., the wash, creek or river bottom) of the Pima County Flood Control District within the three (3) involved washes (proper); i.e., the Santa Cruz River, the Rillito Creek and the CDO. The investigation will need to identify and discuss the availability of adequate easements and the requirements to maintain both a physical (horizontal and/or vertical) separation between reclaimed water lines and sanitary sewage conveyance systems and/or other utilities, and provide a structurally sound delivery system. The investigation shall then use easement availability and the separation requirements, along with the locations of other potentially conflicting utilities and structures, to rate segments of the three routing alternatives: These three routing alternatives are those that would: • Use existing public roadway rights-of-way as one alternative, versus those that would • Use existing public sewer and utility easements along the banks of the CDO and Rillito Washes as a second alternative, versus those that would • Place the main deliveryfacilities within thepublic rights-of-way of the Flood g Y Control District along the watercourses as a third alternative. For the routing into the Marana basin (and in addition to the evaluation involving the recharge basin noted below), determine the feasibility of using an alignment ' adjacent to the Santa Cruz River flood control levee so that, if there is sufficient space within the levee easement, right-of-way costs can be minimized. The results of this investigation should then be presented in a form that will easily identify the benefits and detractions of each segment of each route; including cost, length, easement constraints, and other similar rating factors. 3. The investigation must determine and account for the existing effluent deliveries to Pima County's Arthur Pack Golf Course and the analysis must be based on the assumption that the same quantity of effluent will continue to be delivered to the Arthur Pack Golf Course. 4. Investigate and: a. Propose siting locations for the required "base" pumping facilities, the required booster pumping facilities, any required reservoir storage facilities, and the required recharge facility; b. Determine the optimum size and/or capacity of the required pumping, reservoir storage and recharge facilities; c. Provide a preliminary capital cost estimate for these pumping, reservoir storage and recharge facilities; and w w sewerage Systems Administration Page 2 of 5 September 2 1998 3:44 AM 10-23-1998 3.00PM FROM P- 5 Scope of Work , FA Ina Road Reclaimed Water Distribution System j -/L1 1J-3 J d. Provide a preliminary estimate of the annual operations and maintenance costs for the pumping, reservoir, recharge and conveyance system facilities. Determine if the "primary" pump station can be powered from the ha Road WPCF power generation facilities, and base the preliminary power cost estimates on either ha Road WPCF power, or the lowest interruptible power source or any other preferred power source that may be available through either the Cortaro Marana Irrigation District (AMID) or through other available cost-competitive sources of electrical power. e. The "primary" pump station and main reservoir will be located at a point in the vicinity of—if not on —the Ina Road WPCF. The "primary" pump station will receive effluent directly from the biological nutrient removal (BNR) treatment process facility to be constructed as part of the ha Road WPCF Process Change and Expansion Project. In addition, a certain portion of the secondarily treated effluent from the existing treatment process train will be diverted from discharge into the Santa Cruz River to a storage and recharge basin. The storage and recharge basin should be sited in a sand and gravel pit located northerly of the Ina Road WPCF and adjacent to the Santa Cruz River. A"secondary" or "recovery"pump station (located northerly of the proposed storage and recharge basin) would extract water from the "underground reservoir" of recharged secondary effluent after the effluent had been filtered through the underlying soil. Only the "recovered"secondary effluent water—as a supply of supplemental reclaimed water necessary to satisfy customer demand —would be pumped back into the reclaimed water delivery system to blend with the water pumped by the "primary or abase" pumping system. The investigation and analysis should develop and present the positive and negative benefits (capital costs, annual operating costs, legal constraints, etc.) of this concept in addition to the primary reclaimed water pump station located on or adjacent to the Ina Road WPCF. NOTE: if the filtered secondary effluent recovered from the recharge basin is insufficient to makeup the volume of reclaimed water needed, it may be necessary to propose a tertiary treatment alternative to supplement the effluent produced by the BNR treatment system. f. Another alternative to consider for the CE)O basin is the feasibility of locating and constructing a Wastewater Reclamation Facility(with sludge delivery by the existing sanitary sewage interceptor to the Ina Road WPCF) along the basic route of the COO Interceptor that will produce a reclaimed water comparable to effluent from the BNR treatment process to be constructed at the Ina Road WPCF. NOTE: Enough"carrying" sewage flow must remain in the interceptor to convey the sludge to the Ina Road WPCF. The investigation and analysis should develop and present the positive and negative benefits (capital costs, annual operating costs, public acceptance, etc.) of this concept as an alternative to a reclaimed water booster pump station; including: Sewerage Systems Administration Page 3 of 5 September 2,-1998 3:44 AM 10-23-1998 3=01 PM FROM P. 6 • Scope of Work �? Ina Road Reclaimed Water Distribution System � J� J • The beneficial effect on the ability of the existing CDO Interceptor to continue to serve the overall sewage service basin; • The beneficial effect on the ability of the Ina Road WPCF to continue to serve its overall service area; • The beneficial effect of a reduced reclaimed water pumping system at the Ina Road WPCF and of a smaller-diameter reclaimed water conveyance • system between the Ina Road WPCF and the proposed location of the Wastewater Reclamation Facility (WRF); and • The measures (and incrementsl costs) that will need to be applied to make the siting of a WRF along the CDO Interceptor acceptable to the public. 5. Determine, from the quality of reclaimed wastewater required by potential customers, whether any additional treatment of the effluent (produced by the BNR treatment process to be constructed at the ha Road WPCF) will be needed. If additional treatment will be needed, present a discussion of the quality and quantity of treatment required and provide an estimate of the additional capital and operations and maintenance costs that should be anticipated. (See Note above concerning the possible need for additional tertiary treatment at the ha Road WPCF.) 7. Provide fifteen (15) copies of a preliminary draft of the above investigations and findings to the Wastewater Management Department for review and comment, and discussions with other involved parties. Address all comments or questions that may be returned for inclusion in the final draft of the Routing Study, Rate Study and Preliminary Design Report. 8: Consolidate all of the capital cost estimates, developed from the above investigations, into a preliminary capital cost estimate—for the purposes of developing funding alternatives—for final design and subsequent construction (including engineering services for construction management) of the proposed reclaimed water distribution system; and present the preliminary capital cost estimate (including the preliminary capital cost estimates of alternatives) as part of an overall concluding presentation. 9. Consolidate all of the annual operations and maintenance (AO&M) cost estimates, developed from the above investigations, into a preliminary AODM cost estimate for' the proposed reclaimed water distribution system; and present the preliminary AO&M cost estimate (including the preliminary AO&M cost estimates of alternatives) as part of an overall concluding presentation. 10. Prepare and present an analysis of reclaimed water rates, developed for each of the three involved basins (the Rllita Wash, the COO basin, and the Marano area). From this analysis, preliminary reclaimed water rate schedules shall be developed using the following additional criteria: a. For each of the three (3) legs of the delivery system; without additional charges based on zones of elevation; Sewerage Systems Administration Page 4 of 5 September 2, 1998 3:44 AM 10-23-1998 3 01P FROM P. 7 Scope of Work � � IT ? �' Ina Road Reclaimed Water Distribution System f-�� y LL! b. For each of the three (3) legs of the delivery system; with additional charges based on zones of elevation; • C. For a rate schedule that proposes a single rate for all customers; and d. A rate schedule that proposes a dual rate schedule consisting of: • A commercial rate based on $45Q per acre-foot of reclaimed water delivered to commercial customers; and. • A public-benefit rate that would be developed for the balance of reclaimed water delivered to facilities that benefit the public. 11. Prepare an Executive Summary of the final draft and present fifteen (15):copies of the final draft to the Wastewater Management Department for review and comment, and discussions with other involved parties. Address all comments or questions that may be returned for inclusion in the final Routing Study, Rate Study and Preliminary Design Report. _ 12. Publish and deliver thirty (30) copies of the final, approved Ina Road Reclaimed Water Distribution System Routing Study, Rate Study and Preliminary Design Report to the Wastewater Management Department. 13. Be prepared to meet with and present a summary of the involved investigations, findings, and conclusions to Pima County officials, including Wastewater Management, Flood Control, and Parks and Recreation staff, and the cooperators. Oro Valley, Manana, Flowing Wells Irrigation District, an Metro Water District, when the investigation and evaluation is: • Thirty percent (30%) complete; • Seventy percent (70%) complete; and • Ninety percent (90%) complete. • Sewerage Systems Administration Page 5 of S September 2, 1998 • 3:44 AM 1 i 1 ,................. _ .-::-...- .--...,..... . . . .....,:. —— . . ' . — --•—•:—.:-... „.:, . . — .- . ,,. - .. ..., i VSs>...!i.::%%.:4ISo}:.. >:Si?::Y . .... „:.,:,...:.....:. ti:..: —. . ,.,..,,..,....:.. c -.:-.'::•"7:7.:74-";,,::,„...::::::::1:1 .:: � :::gip{ f # 4 '' .' ""'-:—.:.'----.....„,,.... — , .,..,.. . :.-::::::::;:.:,;:::„.i.,,s;;J:fp.:::!:::,4Eil'iiii...,,tiii,tizige.....,-::-........ ... . . ,..., —:........ : . ' : —... .. • ...::•...:.... .. . . . .. . ;:.,,::::.;;::.':.::i'.::::::::::!::;i,,',:,...:,i::':... - ' . C 4 '''.- ...'. } S Y-0C 4C I,- .. : :-..:-........ . . .. . ' 'i, .....-...............-.::::.-.- . ... ER .;....i......... WA LEY VAL ORO UTILITY WITH nUSSION CIL PUN DIS - & C yOR MA ION .,. D . y SESS ......_,.....: . -. . ... ........:....:.,..........„.. ,,..,........ ..... STU 10/26/98 .. .. ., . ...... .. ........., . • ..,. ..,. . ...,...... ,:„.... ......„...,......... 1 J options ort term • itegy N a • :. 4 : rf :����La�� f f Y ms �S O .:-:,::;:,,,,.;.,,..:,.. itiliiiii,,, A .... .. ..4 .... • . - - . , ..• .--. , . . . • .-.'..--.........--, % ..... . ..---..'''''''':'-•.;'-'.:''"".*:''''''''''''''''''...:::::':-.,':::!:::-:".::':::::::::::..-.:::::::_;:.:::_:.:.._.:....,.........7,.......:.....,......,::,............:_,,,.„,..:„......,......, .-..-..,........._. .,,,... ..... ' . .''.----. -• , . -,....„....,.-...,.„.:,:..,..,.....:,..........„..........,....... ...::...::.-:-::'. —. .....—......'.....',;.:::•-•::- : ..— '.. . 'Y. ,: , . -::.-'''''"....":::.--. : ., -:- ''' ' '. . . .4--....:-....................,.i....... , ..,'...:.........'.......-1.........: iiiisi,,.),:..................i...•.'•:.......•'........1....'.....: —...— . ..-..............f.'.:...........?:—.......".—' . II - . • ::.. ....,.......,'..... ./....:-......... -•'''• . . `ikf 0;::!'.:.::4;i fitY•'• wl� ' -:r} k. ":: .•} 3:?#:.. .. - •. . f. . . : . . -....''l• ..i.-. ..- '.........11. - .... ::;41.::::::,!:!.:;-:......1:::!$;...:....•-:-,..i:',1--1:':.....'..:::::!1:-.....:.::::.:.:::::::::::'''.:::..1.:',:;:::.:....i.::•....-....:.....-:.:::.............-...-..:-...'..:::::,....-..:...•••::-.:'.:...-.......,...:'.:'.-... - .- '!.....:...-:...:.,.:..,..!.,..:...:.,,...:..„........,,.......:.......•...:::..:..,-........„......,....-,.:...!.......„......,..:...,:.,.:.....::...:.:.:.,...-;...:::...„.........:..:,....::.,i::.:.::..:..:.:..:,:i....,.........,...,.,,...,.:.i.,...,.,,.,:::..:,,........::,:.,.::....•.:..i.,..:...-.,....•.,..-..-...:.,.,:...:.....::.....:..,:.•.,-,.•.....:.:•,...7,—..:•.....:1...:...,,..,..;-•-..:,t,.,..,.:.,,.!:,......,,,.'....:..:........::.-.:..:.:.,.,.!:........,.,:•.......:....._....,...,.,.....,!•.....-...•.......-.:....._-,.,.....:...-:.•..,.:::.....-.,..,..:.:.....-:..,,...:..::...,-..:.........-...:,..„...ii....-..:.::...;„:.....-„..........:.:,...,.........:„..'„.....-....-....--......„......_..:.,..„.........-....-.::...-.::,.:.,.-....-.-..•„.:....,...,.,,..,-.....:.s.,.„-....-.,,:....:......-.,......,...:........-.:.....:....-:..-................-..•.-„:..::.,.:::......„...::.i.,...,.,.... < < 4< .........-.....,..,..,.:..:. nciI 4 :F:... .•...•:........:•.:,...... ...,:....-.......:..........-.:......,.....„...... ....:.......,.. ......... ..,.... .. .. . e ■ — . ions i .......::,,...:....,....,..•,,...:...........:........., ...,.. ......,.......!...,..,.:,...1::::„.......i...„.......:.,.......--..- 4 f y < i if F 4i } r -..';.:.•'.........i.i.:!;.[:•:Iiit!"1.:11:1:1::;.::::?'14.':!..:::•!::....:1:::::"..ii''..:•:::•...,::.,;',":.':,..J . ....'..••••,.:-:.,•:••••:"...,.....,...:..................'.....'....:.:...........::.::::.':'.:'!:''.:::"...::..:'::"...!...:,...'.!::.::::...'''.....::::::•':.:"...:•.:;.......11.1:':,....iii.;'::::'..'.;....1•'•!...?::::1:1..'...'''...'....'....:'..:::::::•::.....-•.•.1::::.:7....'I:',.....-....'.... ........ . . . .. . . . -...-.1.........." .. • ... .• - :.... .. .. ..,.:.:....''',.'",':.!!:::;11 s!�y..ter.<:r:.':'�. ... .3 ...:.:.:: rl,....:.:.::... ....r ......r....>. ... .. .,v.....,.. 5't ......-.,1, it„a .Y'W.�•'S''. .r ::.:.. .: .... 'k........ .. ...... ...... .......s. .. ....-.. .. ......•. A:.. y.itY #i,�.'•,+.�t r�tY�: .. .. :. :,....:} :...... ...:... is J.. . . : - ��.:Q,PI 4{ Y. ).. :i 4 ..:�: ..�::. ..:..:: ..... :9.rJ. n:r.^.i�is1.4":.d 1:• .:;�,.'•}<:;r. ,p�b�ti!::r. �' r .$ AalIlk kF . ��a J h{ 4.4 } k } :.... g 3.•: }•r'�'.ii ':;,4 'r5.��'..,•�._',{4J 3J { . rtterm F: { r , { 1F/fI/ S } k } •a r. ....-...�...... ......................'........ r\ . r... s....r r...::. )..:;: >:.. S J... ].. i%% 3 ...:.: .... ............ ....... :..: Y-.......::::^..•:::t:a v;!............. of Y: .:. :. is ..... .:.. nv::: ‘;101',‘,. • • • • ••••-••• • ••••• wJ .. '.-. •::;:: ... .. 'ts 6',m biz . er . • tern (A) .••.•.• •••••••••••• • •.••. ••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••• •••••••••••• •........•• ••• ••. .. • •••••,..•••••.... • • •• • • ...•• •. •• ••• •• . •• • •••• • :•. •.•• ..•.. • . • . ••......• • ..: ...• .i• :• •is• :' \ 111.4L .„,,....„,,,,"..„.„:...,. .„:„„,,..,..„,„„,,..,„,.:... „....„,,,„.„.:...,:::.,.. „.„,,,.,„...:3.,„.....:....,... „:„,,,.,,,,,,,,,,::,„,,,,,„",",„-„„, ,,,,,,„,.,.„,,,,,i;?fli4iiGlfy K�iAla, ii::..:: /�4 f!f ...„..., . . ..:..........:,,.......,,,....,...„.._.....:„:„ �,�moww {{a :,:.y):}fi t::::,,r,s;t%:.: �'�::•':i"ri:::�F:it:ly',:i:;ii:i::J:(,;:�:i::i:: „,,,,„„,„,„„„„„,„,,,,.,.,,,,..„:„:„:„,...,..„...„....,.,.. ..,............ . . ...... ...... .. . .. . t.,..;......,.,,,„,„.....,„„:„,,,,:::,:,:,.....,,:!...,,..................,...............„................. ..........::....: . ... .. . . . . . . • . ....,....,..„...:,:.:::.::::_-::-... f f f f f1 • ...,...... ..................... . . . ,. :::,..,..,...... . ,„..,,,,,,,y,.... .. . .. . .. •. .. . ,,..,:„.„,.„_.., . . . ....... ...,..... sk€aw... m .:.. r f. „„ _ ., .„,,...4....„„„:„.„...:..„.....„ ,..„4,,,,.:,...... ,,,. .......,„,..... ,„:„..,:,,,,....,„.„,..........:.„:..„:„....... . ................... ... .. ...........,...........,..... . . ,„............. ...._,.............. . ................ .........„::::„... pe . , .. ..... N 0 •••.,.... - ' .,..........-...:;:iii,i.i.-;;;:?,!:!!...f..1!..:.!.!...:......-:::::....,..:.::::.:,..,...:.. ....,................... .. .....„....: ...:::.. . ... .... : . .., -1 ...........,.....„,:„:„.•. ..,............„............,.........- . ...........-,.....„,..,,,,..... • ....„..,...:::,.,..,„:...„.c.;,,,,,..„.,....:,.,...„,..,:...:...:,,......:......... ...,.„.......:::....................„i„,::...,,,.,:,........:.,........,... ......:...,,:7:::.:.,..:....„.,...:::::.:::::...".„................„...„......2.........„.... .........:,...... . . ,...... ••.... ..:::::::;,!....F...i.:::,it:!....::liii'iir..: :.:,,...!;:::,....::::::::[.......::::.,..... ... .......:,..„.:7.:„..........,..,,......„.....:::::.::::,:...:.:... ..„............ ..... ..:,_... . ;:,......,.............,...,...,............. ,-......,...............••..................,.......";......."..."...."..• .... ..... ......:,.:.: .... .‘ ' s.„ ,f, ,,,,,,, .:: :: 0 rs •oi o i{x . • ::,:...:7::::,,,,,........,,,,,:::..:::.:.:....•. ......:......7. .':••" ........ f , A, ..,...._.,.........:..,,. .. .... ,.. . . -••••••••••••••-••---- .-- --' .- - --- '.---::..:..'...:..---.-..... . - ... ,,,. . .....' ..............-..-'•••••••••'''•••••••••:----'''".-..••••-•••••••''' --......---- .- --- - - .-. , - - ...,...: ... . .. , ........, .......... ........ ,.. . . ''' .. ...... ".........' '... '''' •''':'''• - -.•.--- - - -- ----.--- -.-,-- ...- , '''' . .. .'''.. .''. .-.-..... -:...- ...-.-.''''.....'''''....:'-'•::::'.....:E.*:•::-.:••••••':':".:...:.::-......-.:-...-''''........':::.':.------'-''''....-...-'-' .-..''.-...-.......-- ...--..•:-.....":.-:::-.:.:::....- -..•...., ,.t.. i I' ' ' . . ..........--..-••: ''''.';---. -.---. :-'-':...:•-:'-......:-.-..-.:-.'"''"::::::1'..-:'::::.•..'-'....::.•:-:.',-•:--:..-- i ii:-..r.,---....-:.::........-.... ..-....,..-.....::-..:......::.:.:......:...:... ......:...........,,. :........::::::.....,::::.............:::.........,.......:,:...............„...:::......................,..............:,........................,......,,, .. ,. .. , ,, ,, . - .::.. .::-. ..:,:�. ... .:: � :.: :�,: its: .�.: •.. :-/.f{v`."-s':;:;A'/1 w,s♦Sv36(asU,sib 3Nft�yii,u -Arawk{ w !---.:.'.•-•.:-:•-•!.:‘..: �:r J r . :.- y vary.: ... ewni• ;: ..:. ':>:> : -...i.-....: . ,: :,;:- <::S.Y)� � r:,'i�{si •f by:��.c!�'!'�:�i3�.,e-. w!qi' �� :.. ::;{.,:;!:. .->sa.{.:irf: Srr Aim � !o't'\4pyr;'4w . 9;., // �-•w :-.t 'w •;.c.'l,•:.Y f• .......... .... ::. :... :: .F..[H b.:...A ....f 4:4'• pi { :i3 :):C;'r.;}f .. :.. � �..�� ..yES !`o�'/;.:'11' Z t,. %+ri�^ :ay S � � Z` ,( 'M 5 Qyt ry, � 3 ,.•,.„1.,,,,,.........,,,,;:: J 4 5 Y!f . —........... i .... • . . ,. . . . . . . -. - ,11'...!,:,:.:•::::-...:•:',1•,:,.::'..;:]'.......!...,:',...:......:1-!.....'..!....J.:,.,,'..,!!,./......,',.,,,'..:,,:i.:!....1...::::!......1......,!:::..:,..':::!...:.•:::...,.•':.'11::.::....,..:::•:::...1.•-....,............:,.........,,..•::::.,•........-...:.:...•,.......-.....:._..•..i.......:.• .....••••...' . .. : ....:...........,.....,.....................,..i...:......,............:,..„...,•,...,....„,....,.,.....;„.„.....,:.....:-.....„.......-.E..,....,....:„,.„.::....'„:,:,:::::,•„,•:::.:-....::.-...,..:.:. ...,::.,-„,.,::... --.. .„..-,: :,....... Tucson :• , ...,:,:,,..:::,,,,,...•:,...:,...,.:::..::::„.....::::.„;.....,.,.,......„:..,•,,.....,„:„.;•.:•„„:•::::,::::...„.,...•,.......;.......,..........:......:„.•. . . • 4 1711+{ . .....,:: ,::::.,,,•..--.:::,, :-.--.,-. -.,„.„- -- -':. : - - . - . .............,.... .... ...•:.......... ..-..•:--:::-.--...-....:::.-...,.:.:::•}.:.-:::-...::::„..:::..::,!:'-.....-•:::.•.........:•-•..........-.::....-.--..•-•:‘:-...'.....„....,......••••.•::„._:„.„••••••••••.--• .:::...,•:::-..-,.:,..:::. ....• .-•-•-. - .:•• . .- . .. . ::. •.... .. . .. ...,..... ... ..,.. ... .. . . . .. .. .. -.-,-. -,:•:....:.•••:•:::-....••••:. ..........:,.....,.....,•,,,.....,,,....,........,..,..,...:,,.,,,... ... .....: •• .• . .. . . ....... .,.,.......„.......,..„,...,...... ..... . ... ••••••• .... ... ..•.........,:„...::..:.....,...,,.:.,..,..........,..........„.................„.............••••••••••••;:- . . .-1 - ..-.- . ..-- .: -. -:-.• ' • • ... ' . .. ... .. . .......•••. . .. •..•• { -_ "......................vet,.: . . .. .. .. ... ,.. . .. ..... .. : .. . .. .- - - . - ith ... .... ......,,,....... .............. ....,..••......... .. , . , ....•... ,....,....:...:„....,„.......:.,::....... •...,..,..... . • ••..•„. .....,............„ .„.....,.......: .......:....•.• .... ••.. ....„.....,..........:. .. . . . ,,,,,,,:...„.,,,,,...........,..,,,,,,.::.......:.:::::„,,..„::,:.,•,:::,...........,....:•••,•:...- •.: . . M1 ,......„,....,........:.......,...,. . ::,,:;,.,-...-::::::•:•...-:.;,--.;-:-....•:.-:.... ..--. :::..-:............,........E.,..-.--.:::•.:.-......-.....:...........:...,......:,:-........:.'.."..,-:::::...::::..--.-. •. - .. . 4{i J /ECJ a,r3f/ �-;, ! H V tea, .....,,,,:,,„,..,.:••...:....:,...,... :..........:• ...::..:.„::.• •....•.:. . . .•. i r: { ! ........,............... .... . ..... . .,....,:„......,..„,.,.........,..... ...,:„.•,.;:„..,:„......„,..,..„•:•::::,,,,,:,•:„.•,....:::::„.,.,_,;„:„...„...,•,„;.„.„,,,.,.,..,:.„.„...„...,,,,.„...„:„:„,•:„.::„..;••••••••••:„.....,,,....„:„.,,,.„•.:„:::•:.„:„....:„..,:f...:::::....:::•:::-.....„.....•••:.....•••.:. •.. ... y yJ- { J .. ... -..,.:, ....:........ .•.• • ..... ..;::::,,,:;:::;:„. •• .. -- •3, ., S frf� � Oiri[� : { �� 4yt/'+�- L r t r {)!v 2 Y$ /t„' •.9..s s.''f'„,-. r r.,f a ,..:. .• .. t — . .- . :.... : - . . .....:...... .: ,................,,,.....,.........::.,..,..............„:„..,,,................„ .:•..., S .,. it {-{.: ,.......,...„..:.........„..,.::........,,.........:,..:.,........:.,...„..,:•••....,:::.:....:...............,..:........... ...............:.,.:....,.................:.,,......:.,,.....,.....,....:„.....:.:..........„.,..... .....,...... .... . . ...:..............,..:.:„:......:„.•,,.....,.:.....,:....,....:.....;.....:........:........,....:„..:•:..,:....,......„,..:.•,...... .........„,,:,.........•••••••••••,..,.:.•• • ...• ..• . • ........,.......:••••:„., ,.•••••:......„......, .......„ :•:........,.,..„.,„„„,„.. . .. , ,...„,::::....-....,•„-„,.:.„:.......:,,......:.:.,,...,.........;•,:,.-:,- ::.••••••.: •••: .- - :- / ::...:::.:...........,:.,::.:„....,..............:::.,..:,„:„....,.:.:.:...:.:„:„,..::::.:.:.:::,:..:....::::::......,:..,•:.,,.....:....,.........,....,:......,„..,,.:.....:„.,::,:,......:........... .. . ..-...:.„..-..„,.,..,.....,.:„.:::.,-..,,.......,....,„....„...,-....-...,:•.,....,......„.....,...1.:...:.,„:.•.„,...,....,„......„.•:,....r.,,,,•:::::„.„.•„:„..:,..„,..„...„.......„...,•,.....,,.:.......,......„.,..,•::::::,•.::•:.,..•.:,••••,..,.„...-.....:„..,...:::•.,..:::::„.„•;•.:.,:....,.„:::•:.,............:.:..,:,:,......,.::.:.:...-::...........:......„.„............. •• .. •.. ••• ... . • • . .. ,....,...:,..,....::,......:.......,..:..,....................... .......,........,.:.....„.::::,.:::..,.,::....„...,....:.:,.:„.,...,...:..,.......:.:.........:,....,:.............•••••:•:•:•...... •• •_ ..:„.....•.•••...„....... ...:.............,......:.:,:....„,.......,.:................,...:...:::.. ...,....,•„,...,:,,..„.:.:„.,,....:•,...„,„,„,.,...,,..,„,,,„:.:„..;,.::„:„,,,,,..;:,.„.„...,:....,:.,,......,•.:.:....,...,.,.:..f.:.....................:...•.:.•••..............: . ..., ,............,...• ....................:..............,..........:.............,..........• ••,.........................:•:••••:....:.•:::......:..... ... .. . •::::::-.-;::::.----,......,.....,-,-,......--:1::,•:::-;-.,.:::;•.,::.•,1:::::,....11.„--,.,...,;::.!:-...i.:::::::-..:,.,....:;:::::...,:-:::.:,..-i•.,1....;:::.:,..,.:::::•,..!.:-.-:::::::.,::::.....:::..,-....:::....;,:::.....:,,,,....,:::::::::-.:;-....-:::::••••,.;.-,,...,:...,:..•.:.:,-,,,..,„,...„....,..-,...-:::::...,._::---:::::..:.::: . ....•••••••••••••,.:,:,-:...::::.-----::--.:::-......---:. —...... ......... .. •.......... • . :.. - ..„. . .„.......•.,„•••••••:,...:„,..-,-.........:,-..-„,...,-...::::::-.---.-:::::.:„..,.:.:...:::,-.,::::,,,,.,........,,,-....;,•,:..,,,..,..,.::-...-„,:-......:,..!:::::_:-.,:•,:,-,..........--...-:-.-...... ... .....:...„.:....:„,....:::::..,..:......„..„...:.:::.:.,...,.:.,,,....,.:.::......:..,:i:::.:.......::::„...„,::..:......::........:„.. ... ; . . • . :.•.........:.................,.......:...,....,..,........:.:.....:........„..,......,.......................:.................. .. .• „.......,.-:.,:..„--•:::::-•-•.:::,-.-,.,:,....:.:::::::,:„....:-.-•••,::::.„.:::,,„:„,:.:••„-•:-:,-.:•,;„„,:::.••••••••,.......,„:,-......-:.:-.-.....,...:::::,,-.....,-,„:::.:.,.:,,,..:.:.:.......:...-.:„.:::........:::-.......... ...............„:..........:.............•••••••••••••••••:........::::--.--,:_:::,:.„....„.,.:::.::-...,....:•........„:::-.:.:::,::•••••••••••....:::•-••••••••-•:::-:-:•••••„---:„..„:----„: - ....,........................,................. :,.,........:...:...::............... .. • • ................•••••••••„,....................:.,...:......:.........................•. ... • ......::.......,.:..,....:.,.„.., • ..........................:,:,............ ..........:..-...-:,....:...,..,:,.:1::;,,:::::,::::::,...::::,:.:::::::.,::::::..,.:::!:::,„:....„:".„.,::,..,..„",...:.:.,-:.:::::..,...::::...-,::,,.:„..:.::::.:-.....:,...,,:::•,,..-::..-..:„.....:.....„:.....:-.....,.........:......-„:-...-::........-.....•••••...•„•:••......:::::.:::--,.........::.,:•::....,::::,:.........:.:;.:::::::.....:;•,:::.•.......:.......,--•.::-.•:,,,,.:„..,,:::.:,::.„„:.:::„:„:„:„.:•-•,....„::....„-.....,:,..,•::::„„,„„.-.,-..,.,...;:„,„.........,......,,....::....:.....:::::-...,.„.,„,-,•„:,„:„:-....:::„.,,,..,,,:,-.......-„....„-:,•„:„:.,..•„:,-.,::::„.....•-,.•:::-...•.,,...........:.::•••-• •-•••••••••• - ..,..,„.......„....„.:.:,,,.,„..„::,::::.„,,...,..::„.:....„:.:::,:,:.:.:::::::..„....:.•;.:::.....:.....:.......,:„.„,:..„........:„.:...,....::..„.„........ .. . ...... :„....,...................................,............,.......,..,...........„:.............,.........:.,•,.....,..„..„:„:•••••,••••••••,.......•••••••........,...........,.. :.:....:,...:.,„.............. ........... . ,,,,,,.:„::-.....,„,....„.•••,,,„,„:„,:,,„,,-,„.•,:,„•:::::,,,,,,,,,,,...,..„...,,,,,„:„.:•.,...:•.,,,„:••,:.,..,,,,,:,.,„,•„:,:::,•,•,..,•:::.::::::...,,..„,.••••„:„......,:•......•,:••........•...•••.....„•:... ... , .. ..• •••••••••••• ....—: . ....::..,..:„.„„.........,.....„„.......,,....,..,,..,....,.::....„.........,.... :.............. .. .. .• ............. . i::::....-:::-....„..--:....-::..-• . •• •••••••••••.---.-.........--..-.....-••-.::--....::-.:.:--- -. - r 431.is .: .. 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: October 26, 1998 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: DAVID G. HOOK, P.E. ACTING TOWN ENGINEER SUBJECT: FUTURE ROADWAY PROJECTS SUMMARY: Over the years, staff has worked with the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) to program roadway improvement projects for their Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). The TIP is a 5-year plan that assists with the planning and programming of projects where PAG, ADOT and federal funds are used to assist local jurisdictions with implementing roadway improvements. As you are all aware, the community has experienced significant growth in recent years and that trend is projected to continue. The effect of this growth is just now beginning to manifest itself on our roadways through increased pavement deterioration and traffic congestion. To address these impacts and take advantage of this available outside grant funding for roadway projects, staff has intensified the effort to have additional projects included in the TIP. Staff desires to hold a dialogue with the Mayor and Council regarding the priorities that should be placed on individual roadway projects. Some projects, in areas such as the First Avenue and Oracle Road area, are easy to identify as urgent needs. Others are not so urgent, but need to be programmed in the Town's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as well as PAG's TIP. While it may be desirable to complete every project next year, reality is that workload capacity and cash flow (at PAG, ADOT and the fed's as well as the Town's) limit the ability to immediately complete the entire list. While the CIP and the TIP present a 5-year picture, staff occasionally has a need to look at a longer range. Updating the CIP and TIP, calculation of the Town-wide Roadway Development Impact Fee and properly planning for growth are examples. This discussion will also assist staff when those circumstances arise. Attached for your reference is a table of projects that staff has compiled as a starting point for discussion. Those projects that are in the CIP and the TIP are so noted. Approximate costs and outside funding opportunities are listed. Some of the basic questions that staff would pose include: Are there projects not listed that need to be added? Are there projects listed that need to be eliminated or de-prioritized? Are the projects programmed in the CIP and the TIP in the proper priority (chronological) order? TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 FISCAL IMPACT: The discussion of project priority will have no direct fiscal impact, but it will influence the programming of projects that will utilize local and outside grant funding. Additionally, re- evaluation of the Town-wide Roadway Development Impact Fee will be greatly enhanced with the identification and prioritization of projects for the next 20-years. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends that Mayor and Council provide feedback on the relative importance of projects so that a comprehensive listing can be established for approval at a future meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. The Town of Oro Valley 1998-2003 CIP 2. The PAG 1998-2003 TIP (excerpt of the Oro Valley section) 3. Table of major street and drainage projects SUGGESTED MOTION: No action is required at this time. Transportation Engi r Acting Town Engineer Zara- Town Manager A TTACHMENT 1 10-26-98 General Funds may not be available for: Project111 Description Rank 1 Department 1 Town I Other Pro # p � i J1 I Community Center/Library 4,992 1 Parks 550.000 1 Fl-B I 111 P3** CDO Riverfront Park; Phase II 4,918 Parks $200,000 $200,000 3 Town Hal! Ex ansion 4,821 General Admin $250,000 F7 P F 1-A Naranja Community ommuni Center 4,591 Parks $100,000 V 1-B P Re lacement Admin Vehicles 4,430 Police $38,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1 S1,099,000 S200,000 1111 ** TAC recommends funding this with General Fund contingency reserves if the matching grant or other funds can be obtained. 111 111 Local Transportation Assistance Fund Proj # Description Project Descri Rank Department Town Other III V2 Pool Vehicle/Backup Vehicle 4,683 Public Transit $16,000 TOTAL LTAF 516,000 1 e. High way Fund T Proj # Project Description Rank Department Town Other E3 Backhoe Replacement Assumption Public Works $15,000,, S3 Drainageway Rehabilitation Assumption Public Works `$50,000 S8 Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Assumption Public Works $4,000 V $71,000 S16*** Bicycle Lanes 5,512 Public Works $200,000 / S1 La Canada Dr. Phase I (Landscaping) 4,942 Public Works $200,000 , V3 Service Truck Replacement 4,874 Public Works $33,000 ,,/ E5 Aerial Mapping 4,739 Public Works $50,000 V S6 Barr eras Slope Protection Lambert Ln. 4,663 Public Works $20,000 'V f TOTAL HIGHWAY FUND $522,000 S121,000 *** Contingent on Bicycle Pathway Plan and the ability to implement $200,000 of projects in one year. 11 • j 14 III V 1 II _ , si Town-wide Development Impact Fee Fundi II Proj # Project Description I Rank Department Town Other ine Rd. First Ave to Monterra Assumption Public `'Yorks $48,000\l' $753,000111 S 4 Tane r P S5 La Canada Dr. Ext. Phase III Assumption Public Works $3,000,r $47,000 S14 Lambert Lane Safety Improvements Assumption Public Works $6,000,,' $99,000 S9 First Ave Safety Improvements Assumption Public Works $34,000 v $541,000 (Lambert to Tangerine) ii Sl0 Linda Vista/Egleston Dr Improve Assumption Public Works $114,000,7 $300,000111 Ti Hardy/Oracle Assumption/Oracle Traffic Signal final Assum tion Public Works $29,000/ $450,000 T2 Linda Vista/Oracle Rd.Traffic Sig Assumption Public Works $60,000 $60,000 .1 S7 Tangerine Rd./La Canada Left-Turn 5,079 Public Works $80,000‘,/ Bay T3 Traffic Signal Installations 4,300 Public Works $360,000I • TOTAL TOWNWIDE DIF S734,000 S2,250,000 THE CIP TWO TO FIVE YEARS OUT The capital project requests for all five years are shown in Appendix B. When projecting future P budgets two considerations are important: 1) projects not funded this year will be pushed back to III the next year, and 2) more new projects are likely to be identified. The projected deficit for General Fund capital projects in future years is expected to increase significantly as the Town strives to provide facilities such as parks, a community center, and a � y library. Projections for future years are for needs of$5 million each year versus available funds of racy $500,000. Considering the unfunded projects from each year and newly identified needs, it is clear that at least $5 million of requests will not be funded each fiscal year. It is recommended that the TownP ursues quality economic development activities and outside funding sources to implementI these projects. No similar deficits are expected for the other funds. The Highway Fund needs are expected to remain at a level of$500,000 to $700,000. Adequate revenues should be available to meet those u h the Town-wide Development Impact Fee Fund needs are needs. Tho expected to increase to x� p P over $2 million in future years, the available funds are expected to be $4 million to $6 million. Efforts will also continue to be made to leverage impact fee collections with federal and state roadway grant funding. I I I 15 ATTACHMENT 2 10-26-98 13a) J 0- —1 a. Q. ._r J a_ J a_ 1•- c Q 1- Q I— -- Q < 1- < 1- o u.O 0 U) 0 U) U) 0 0 U) 0 U) p r O 0 0 0 0 Q Z o 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 ~ O c N ti - Cr). w = 0 r >' N u.W J c 0 0 J Q Ncn iin M > oo N _ O N U. IX c p 0 DU DU Cl) � NCO C =N N N LCL O O N O 0 = N ti Cr) DU 0"° - 0U DU O U) M .4• 'n O 'Z3 10 Q) _ Li OO N. 0 0 ) L e; in I) co Oin >" C et N O i_ cn O Cl) Cl) Cl) a) ce >- >. >- >- N C .4' c C C JJ M ca a, O m N N C N C O -1 N C ap 'cr. co IC) a, O J 0 C O C O) O r O =° _, — tui Z a) u o co cop_ . 77 C a' C .c E— cu co i- o ii-- m ,t, a) a) N .T1 • c (!) .a W � ° C � a) � o N Z ✓ J E N cr 3 C ` W co o ti ca o o 'Q r � `� � = ,o L a� c o 0 > _ = cII .r .,, .,c Z V o C — C O C O_ ,0 O C t6a, Cl) O L O N — W O 0 •� p) — Cl) +� C a) c > ` c c_ cc .a cc 03 cc ..G O ca To U o 'E o C LI_ Om0 o a to> Z .0 Q U Z 40- E c O Z o MIMI a) .0 n I— I- Cl) a) U a) 2, o > a� Q cL E o c Z co O o W Z O w E 2 � o - Q m v > > ; m aa) Cn OL Cl) L. in fa c ti.- O (� CO O = Q Z a i . 0 LL ._ }— = 0 = Z Q J 0 N N N 73 0 Q J J a. J Q. O. J J \ _1 LL C F- < Q F- < I- I- Q Q Q to O (f) U 0 u) 0 C)) u) 0 00 O Q O Q O 0 N Z MoS 0 0 0 0 O I- MTs co N 6 0 N- .. >' N ti W J 0 P 1 0 0 0 0 -0 D0 J Q NO coco co N- N N.O 0 N LL ix :,E, 0 0 0 -0 D0 0 y' - U) - v 0 t1) C = ch ti N CO O e- N = !" 83 0 0 0 0 0 N. Co O up a Cr) t j ,•- N O N LL a 0 0 0 0 N O) v CoO O C r LCL O -O 0 ti CO CO LLO 0 - CD ti U) O Co N �- N a)th Cl)a) 0 ch a) a) it >- >- >- >- ›- N N N N .44- N N • M CO O N N V' N N 0 J 0N e- In CO N CD 0) J N O O Off') CC CD 0 >_ C Q C C C 10 .O U 2 .E a. 0 0 0 H oF-1 eacn o N to a U N C •� _� O. .CT -0 2 t0 o . . co .O }- .... o Z .0 0 L N N O LL! 2 Z C ^^`` L o C a) � a) co Ccr O W 0 ti. cn O V) C a) O > 0 a) a) Q. 003 Cr O o Cr cc 0 0 O C o o LL' O10 0 O CO 20 Cr �, -6 o Q :? Z Z o `� >>O L 63 1,."' ,_ O 0 ? W O (f) > O 0 O N Li: I-- C/\ a L G CO O "a Q Q 0 ° c C L N CC ca 0 cc to O L -p CO O -0 O > LU Z Iv a) J � - � '�. Cca C � 0 Ca �+ O O CO O m 'C L •L- C Cl) C 2 Oo-. cd o .- c �, v v y CD c) co C/) U ca. L (n C O C Q O O •� •` O ` O O 2 ca J Z 0. J �- J ._ .c Z ►i cO �-- Q JN N Co N Q 0 N•r• r- �- a. ATTACHMENT 3 10-26-98 j id 0. ° Q cn ,_ c � � FL •- I r(1 co _c II >'71 I N co CU I o I C 10- L. C DI a) I �Iv ti: I -a .3 C ! cin c cm EN I ° 0 = ,♦, L. c O (o �I °O .CI N 10 0 W V)iv 0 , II H II ! 1 10 I 0 .. '•iiSi'•SG Ili) >y t a = 10.§ I 0 lisp 1,,c . o ::,,,r2 „,,,,,,,i ..:,...„,„.„ 1 ...? co n/l p I #t mai ..,... . i • mi.,...,,,›-...,*:11' 3Q�y'ri"(!.! W E r' C.) OPI itiss. t.1 fig g:I; : ‘,.,„..,,,,,,,,,,•„,,,,„ „:,,,.•..• „,„„,„,. ,,:,,,,,, ,,, jy 2 ,J�; .u ie ‘").:ii no .;., . . 1111.—', . „,, .,,,,, , ,r.,.,!win , Ill li :ge- ,t k` "ii:Z+ -$'iii S S :,� sfJ .' 'tips ! ;� ";Ssss`ssi;3 L. c) Ti” iii ll . ill Vii I 3111 7: 2 , ..,0; ",..i:S,Y.... iSiiS%,S: f;i.*6:i :??;t,;x``:�"' 1 .3:'./ ::if S i.'•'.S',.`;SSS a, ,; ,,,,No:: • 0 41.14 Sy ',v; ' ',c ses) ti 52 Air, s.ss:1 Q Q71, is <, N ISI i�{'in�v to 0 c hi ' 1"7 ' 0 IZ 0ii: o 0 ' 0 O O I 0 0 ,-- 0 !0 0 10 0 , 'N 0 'N- 10 ,CC) ILO 0 I op I Et} 6A, Ef3, 0 Et 0 d' Imo- i�O I`!�O M CSO Ef} V' I CO I` IM Ef} C`• Com`• (,� •• N jcn Eft in I Eft (..6- E,rj I EA EA 1 co I co teI�j c` Lo i : �: �� � p ! 1I 1 J N o I IEA Eft EA Eft I I!EA 1 �• 0.. Eft ca O oo LL 0 1— ° t O I O ! O 0 d' I O O O O O CX) 0 I CO i 0 ;NI" LO 0 0 0! Pi 'O I 01 oO ! L U M ! C") LOC") U N — LO1teItiN N 0 O O~ ' — Eft I N i �- M N i N Eft to I N Ef}I N — i ea Eft I tf}I Eft r- N I N C'• '' W ■E X to Eft Eft j ea!, Eft Eft Eft i 1 ! I Ef} Eft 1 Eft C'• Eft W Z.. v . i r I t.. O U) O Eft' i I�. z L. i.. L.. I 1- I L L.. Q L- L- W L C ' CI C CI 1 CI C � rn '•Q)! 1 I C rn, CI ° 0 0 0 0 C 1C C O ! 0 -c � ' >+I C O CO! I—I O 0 •0_ 0 0 I 0 0 0 .2 � O O 0 1 0 = o X0 1 .c20 O U W .° 0 o'6 oa I oo 05 oo 0 0 061 oo 1 O •o6 O 0.51 Q 0 P 'P C C C C C C i ` CIS C Icm! C C f i O C L C j C L C' W _ -. to -� '� •c:DIU •C3)11 'Cr)in 'v) C 'v) ( C 'cn! C 'cn I Cl)' Cf) ° j-� !'v) I C 'v) I 'in C 'vi 1 Z rJ ci .2 a) a) a) a) a) 0 N I O CU' O C) I Cl) N L_ ,.2 O I O o I N O W O z < 0 ct1 0 0 0 . ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IQ_ 0 0 01 010 01 QC -v -0 0 O ; O . 3 �' C C cn O a) Cl. >, E- >,'E a. J -5 o Q, ac) .ca o a) C 0 C C a ..... 3 1 CO 1— co a) CO Q) a) () - i E E C C - co -tcn V 2 .o - co E a CO. ca O a) — ( N 0 c c >- V LLI s - a) Y = > .c > a) ea o cv Z C " c C .O -c cu o (jj u- m = N7:1 "CD •� N c' Z ~O 1 a) OU N C •a 0 •3 co C —i C C .0 ca J = C O cn E > c cv O C }' �' Cu I j °p CO �'• c Z J o v' cv ° a. c, o °� L o� — 0 -- ~ ° 0° 'c co ca Z 2. a) a) 03 a) �_ CD '> Q a. 7.5 0 cn C C U - O v ' 0 ..0 v o O — 0 •? 1 •? Z .� .2 > ca cn cn C o _o -a = U u) co -0 L- 2 06 c_n 0 a) 0 1 0 3 0 a) t) a) ..s CU ° - cn cv (v -0 t••- C O O ) ,_ `t tv 0 ' C V) ' U) c0 O Z O cv U cv CO C' co 't CO co •L.• re O J a) o a) 0 a) u) •- C a) - C - C O C 0 co -cC) -o J 10 a) 7:41 a. > a) cv 0 a) O N N 0 C co a, co cv co rnO V ° C CU O 'w a) -o Cr co .� C E I E C C a) co U C a) < < 0 < < . � a) � = co co CO CO cv cv cv cv 2 '� E >, �- �g O � w -� U w cn O cn U cn § cn 3 L EU F— U U U 0 U U 0 _ s` `. L- COCOL • CO CO CO Z co m 0 0 W LL LiL LL LL I I COJ J —I J Z - - O II t— >,u) , '— O L .O o6 a. , F o 1 o li , o , c -- c N--1 ,- a o a 1 a o 0 .2 .2 N * 4 4- -= N I N a) co . CD 73 X 73 1 1:3 X X C CD C C a) a) cr) 0 C 1 01 o C i a > co >-.1 > C, C 4- 0) I a) a)' co 1 ail I 0 _a 1 _a i .a u) o 0i o CN A I 25 r3 1 :a I 15 r) '6 a) - (Ts 1 0 ca i (c) 0), (D C" E -3 H la _ a3 C) 0.. Ce 0_ u)1 Cl.1 . 1 ca. • (/) (7) In 111 P,,/.e,,0„,,„.a„„,:,i,.„,„5,l„,:1:•,:,::„,,:,,:: CO = aa . ,-„:,„,•,,::,.4-„0,>0-„, ' s1it4:0ty,m,,a,,:,:,:: ,,i„m,,,l,,.,,kI,,,,-,.•..ki-1,-;!,!i .i i1 .„-..vi4ac.-:,:f,,..4•".*”o v ill 'n , , ' ,.,• --. C° 1 > a) el • 1 , 4,,,,,,: a - ' t L cl o Cs1 :f...wm: 0 ......... , CNI '11,1&11 HII: 0 1 Mi1:'j1i:1:11 WO 1 1 ,.:;.,..,,q , >t a tIly1 ',..11Y4 1 1 'ma , 1 Mq', :':,a 6 ,,,,. -''"' •-,, :::,,.. I .ir ...•, a ' .,-:,,,,, 1 ,,,,, ,,:,,4.- •.:.--...,, 1... ,,,v., ,, ,,,,, 0- 0 POP.. CO 0 co Sik i ,'','::.'';‘:.•'',.'.'..::1;:'\'1'.::': 1 ......_ ...._ ni ........, 0 CI) Ch INK :,,.,.•.. Ei.,:'7,k, t 4 11'1 CO Ci c - _ a, , i WA .. ......-- . . . • CC 0 g cr) 1 Ce 0 .La w co i. , 1 et ... , , 1 O a: 0 it. a) .-. 1 a.... , , l'a c::)1 c• CD, 0) I V- CD 1 0 Co 0 0 0 CD I e- !e- CD a 1 o 0 vo, „_1,- CO L0 colt) colf)18 cp ,--lco co mit-- a)lc) (ft -4- r--- c) (ft I h- ,h•- (ft L..- o, v-,I ,CO N CO N I 0 0 •• CD L. CD e-!CO ,-! tol-1 In ‘--'0 0) V' ,-•I 1 EA!`zr , .-_, -1 CD -I EA-I,_.- cr;1 (:;:> EAH(.6 EA Eft co-H Eft EA (ft Ea .1.- e- CO I 1 Ce " ° .0 V. ..J co co 4_, (f)-1 !ta te I !te ! , ! ! , 1 , 1 , . CO U 0 o 0 u. () .1-- , 1 ' -i ' • , o! o!o o, CO1 c.j 00 1 000' Lo ,:t. 1 co a 0 1 o o CO 1 co N- !0 IC)!c) O. I- 33 0! ,,co in 1 te (.0 ,-,co (.0 (0 co 1.0 1 N EA I CN IC) 0)1 LC) CO N-- i Nr v- 1 N e-!4:i..1) - N 1 0,1(ft N I (0. Eft ,- N (ft (ft CNr (ft !69- N-I (ft 1 N Eft 1 i ti, 1'T- I L1-1 E X mi te , (03 Eft I EA 1 EA I '(A EA Li- LLJ fn ci) 1 0 0 ,,, al to -.1 , I , I— v J - ., . I I , I Zt• L.: •, L-.1 •1 : . . . . L.. 1 ..• L-• , 1.1.1 II "rin 1 175 U) U) -1-1)C C C . C C C. C c c, 0 1 i c O c co 000 0 ! c o 01 0 0 C ' C ' a 0 1 0 0 i-. 0 0 l HQ 0, o 0 -..= -47 0, 0 0 v 0 . .:: 0 o.rz 0 01 0 0 0 0 (4 1 06 0 ozs 1 06 1 0 oeS I cio 1 c).5 0.5 0 0 , 0 (..) I... = = = = i ' = C 1 CI C: '' CI C12"..z C ...17., CI C , L- C: C CL.-. CIi C C = = = C 1 1-. C L•••• C! I.- ' '-6, , On Z .4) 0 i'4 21c3)14-• c-3) a)1 cot a) c7) 0)1 ) 0)1 a)1 u) .0) u) .0)1 .C:33 I V) .C:n! .- , V) .- . , .-, . .-CP,I V) .DI (/) .CY) cV) • 1 Ffi .7)' C .Cli .(7) I C C7) C C/5 I (7) 1 C (7)I CB I (/) 1 C V) V)! V), V) I U) IC C V) C Cn LLI -- ' Cl)u) Z▪ .1_, 0....- 8 a) a)1 0 a) olo a) 0 (D1 a) 10 a)1 a)1 a) (D (1) (1)i a) CD 0) I 0 a) i 0 a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 0 cn 0 (..) 0 0 0, 0 10 0, 01 0 (.) 01 01 0 (n 0 010 , , t. C 1 I < I 0 u) a) E a) a) a) i u) -J V. E •- i E ) c co E E CC) . a (I) o w E __ 4(7) a a. a) > •- 1 4- > = E a) •E...-.. u., ,- •- ;-L-_' _ i.... c 2 2 LE -5 Co' . ,.... ... eL •E :'-'7_- o >, 2 2 i- --r. ›- cr) (13 o a) cu-- E co 01) C C W >, •- - = = ,... LLI -7 I- c :.--, - C al 0 75 as ;c21.7) , ._ LLI .-ji c c c w , co E 17) E (ti - 'FF) 1-- o = -J a, '4. Z' o › 0 . , L- - ' L- = 7 7a3 -5 12 a) 0 a) g , co ,5 z -J 0 C I-- ..9, 6 0 a) LiT. ii2 v. 03 5 4.12 ii: c E La 0 8 c >, co F- IL-. o ,— < cc 0 as al 0 F.- i_ as . LI: 0 d ,_ CD I 0 _ca - 0 al (i) i Maii- a30 - Cn '2 b -h- v3 > a) (/) u) T5 - as• (111 0 .1:7 cn 7 4 CD '91-.' (D-Z5 06 (5 -C3 ' H 1:5 (84 (n 8 = • C) CO ' CD .-L-2.- "0 c -6 g -ci ' 0 0 0 .1 (I: CI) C = CIII E - = 4-4 (n ..., c0 , oEopw cow , w1.12w2..) .u) ec 0 -I (ti - E = 03 = _I - _JVIP .-, w - ou) 50 > . _ _ a) 0 cu a) L-- a) . a) u; O , < t.)I oa "asi.l..) coccuc C c .c mi a, o ca C C N C 4-, C 4.... co 0 0 . 0 fl; 6 2_ c0 ' ' .E 2 .F_- -cf; -E-_' . 0 . 8 =0 "5 a) a) 0 -1 -12 .Eg .,-- 0 ..c 8 _c (13 cu aj c g 0 . 0 .., L. co co co co co co o co co co co > _c _c co co co co r O 2 i-. ci) >— :.-. a 0 .2o6 r. a. r (72 1:/2 it. ir. ci c a) 1E c co 0)1 o o E c co . co --I co co a..- i- 1 ,•- x x ;,....., Co _c co E eli c a) C a) 4-. CO 0 C C a, CO (13 0 0 I (1) a3 L.J o o a)1 a3 co _)c --I 1---- c, 0- ---.... , ,.. ci) E 2 ! L,," •-, la •- _o 0 a. -5. in 0 a = 1111 111 11111 CD -6 V a H (i) , 0 R „. .gt Milo .„ ,., ,1 C\I .(n a 1 -,, CD a) ci, ,-- L.... o •:,-.v,, o , 171. wv,,t 0 1 MEM B. IIII o iitg, 111111 1111 :2iim 4-v Arni: ... I Z [mg ,- 0 a i: it4 1 ....... 7.0 1111 111 iiIiii, grIg ,,,.• 111 11111111111 III 1 A al g::iiti Z2 till a)C00e ll,i'.."6fte• .°C(A iUi:) 0at3l 1ECaI ''11tCaD '',1 11eCCinaOD 1 1 0.)•. I C ' 1_c C•.•!1_cC••• ..c Lo CO ' taa,I ,I tao-i eal,taFr 4- --- ta 1 .• Ce ea 1 1- ILL. tn. g .c , , c-1 w c-I 0 (....,_c (... _c 0.. a) c- Co c-,-C c- -c 0 co 0 c) 0 5 i (--14-_-. i c- 9,,,_ , U.. 0 M... LL o a , a i IC) , , o 1 , L' a, a o i 45 u, 11 a I a, a 1 in, in o a. I- 13 - , CO ,i- 1 I Co N 1 I Co co I co Co Co `a I- N I .4- co N '4' IC) LLI "E X To 'I m 'I i C ,--- C ,-, ,- ill ta, to , (A-1 to=k N (ft 1 o eft i Ote I Eft 0 ! O LL w 47, 0 C•••1C••• C'- C'- ' C••• C•-• C••• C'.. W iTf; O I Cl) 0 1I 0..10.. , c,.. C- , 0.- c- c••• c- i 1 LU to -J c•-•IC'-- c•• c,- c••.c••• c•-• c•-• (/) Z L.: 1 , , L. L. 1 I. ,..: 1 ,..: 1 L. L. 1 L..: L. LLI Ce - .. 4 4 7) i .... ... , ..... ...1 ......, co cn I cn cn, co i cn c n 1 co 1 Ce "In , • .c -in' in 1-ii • 0 c c I c c c c c 1 c c i c 0 C 0 0 0 0 0' 0 o 0 0 (Si sS Co O' O O I- .2 0 .0 0 0 0 0 oc.) 0 0 Zoi 0 .0 0 00 W , s 06 9 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 1 06 a) u) 06 I 0606 < . 0). 0)0)cr)0)7)0 P. .r. c ff. c c c c c c c c CD C ' c ?6' .(75c! cc a. z 5 o >,, .0) (- . . . . . . . Z -0)1 .2) .c >, .s-j , )! 27).2) LLI — 47. Cl) 7, , iT) c Fri u) u) u)0) (/) (i)0) (/0)) u) — (/) (/) al (73 u)i u) u) z o a) - I Co o Co Co Co Co Co Co a) Co! Z Co Cl) . L._ c a) a) a) CI z < 0 (1) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 z 0 ' 0 cr)0 cu 0 00 _c . a. >, c -0 ,„ a) a) -II a) —J 7373 a) -r-1 E c 0- 1 a. c p., 0 , „, ._ 0 (,) 03 a) 5 1- o I- c Jo o c fri: E 2 43 n - jo . al (.) L- •- 0 -I >, a) CD 13 CO c -c5 n w E -c) E a) a) cL a) _I 0 c _ co c _c) T) (a .., -6 (xi - < Ce o c 2- n cu .... _ EF2 2 -5 0 ... 0 _c 12 C‘ " cu -c LT- co a. a. --I a) c © -- co o >, .c -•-. • a. .(41'1; -- ,n S u) 1) -ti2 ° 0 "th' 0 Co Li: - Co a) oa CC -c- 'co co Fri w O r1C4 0 c , L c 2 -6 .- To 0,5 -6m (-5 ,- -6a3 Co co co Co o (20 (-7) 0Lt' cu- C C _Jcir. c _ic 06c 06C 06cCo › L_ c CL 0- 4- Co>' 12 73 c Co 73 0 ,. 0 (Z2 (130 . - ce --; -' c'fi .1-7; g •173 0 .7) -a .7) 1-/) -7) 06 '(7) (.5 'Zii oo TiS &) '(7) 2 V) &) V) a) -0 0 n co a) .5- .- t c • o < ti °a 8 o 8 D5 t 5 .(ti .(0 .(13 .L--- .= 1--- < La2crci) F.„ '4' F„ ... cvs - - co co c co co co co Co co co i- o co o Z a. z iT) iT) I -i Zi Z Z Z F- I- I- CO 0 H --i H O V. I- co Z' T. 0 od .0-: a. , T , - - ID CD C a ! C ,. (0 cn E D o 1.) 45 , 1E T ' , , fl T.) a I= al-c) E u) .- -a c F-) E , 0 < .c w ...... To I-0 = . _ = 143 CO =1 0 :•E_' C •- 7:3 a) c 1 -0 c! u) 0 as c 0 (1) -cE cn CD .- C) Cl). COCD 2 I o cu a) ,-. 2! Co a) 4..• CD I • co C eL -0 "'co o , ,-- 0) E co 1 8 f3_ = - ,.. "ti; o ' CZ cp .13 Cl) O. C 0 1 0 ID a. Ct a)I(A) 0 I C/)I\•`....,' ; C) I II II II . I i 0 0 ......- ,..,,,,,,a , In u) I 10.1 I i • :iagig c0 c0 0 = 1 $kiii ,,,e, 0) 0) ,:t 74 A"..r,,;. , o ,,- 1 . '4.Mi cr) CO ,„,...0,„:„., , ,rk.,:,•-„„ LI 0 0 cs, Ilp:, ,,,,,..„:811.,., . ,,;;; .„.,.• ' '.....‘.:,:'1',;','::14,'::.:<:';•:': • • Ce) ,,,AiN 1 -'''''''.'.'i it5P' :;", ,s,...„, „-,• Ei'b'''': . •W4, • 73 0 AVi 1 ......,,,,,,:• ..... ., . —.,...,.. ..,.. , .• • • •,,,, ••••,...-- Vt.,....!,,; a) i,:I.oki :,,..,..,•„.„,,..,,g..,.,:• .4,..„.,,.,,.., . , .. ... > 4 w .-,••„ „„•„:.. , , , •___ a ON 1 (I) CN1 igi-M ' iIiitge !:IIIIi0,6iI , , L.- 0 ig:P :or.k. ,,,,,e....a: ,.:0;•',...,,t-s'i," Apq 1 .........-- . , ,......._ •••••••- -......„ I OP ..,.,....,.., :,,,,,,,,• ; tge: fr.-..,,,_ ::•-•,...0::. I i 0o 41 1 1 I er .0 ti 52 all AEI i . 1 0 CX (.) ii: a) ! :: !!!-• !'!'!'!'!'! 1 '''''!: :!'!:'!'!:'.'' , 0 (DI 0 0 wo 1 0 ,--- o lc) 0 io 'CD I CN1 0 I,- 'CD 'C.0 , ' ' 0 I Ei) Ea. Ea 0 Ea I 0 d' 1,- LO N- LC) Ce) I CO 1 E03 `Cr 03 I t•- !14i .. 5 3) 0- 0 C..) W.• L..in0 414 1 CO E,3 V) LO 'r 1,- 'cr h. a) I N 1 Eft Eft Eft I co- Eft,c.,..i "1 Eft 1 Eft I CD I CO !CO C,-I C'• LO I lft .1 TA . ,,-- ! 1 N- 0 4 0C'..•I 0C,`-.CO 0 • E‘ft--- 1I 0- c,- LL ' . CO o 1 ..:1- t o o 1 o ' -1- ' 00000 I co 1 o co :0 i NI- !in o o 1 o a. „,I- 33 ,- 0 co 1 ,-- IC) IC) co co I IC) CO I Lt) N 1 •,- IC) I Eft I 1".- 1 C\I I CN 0 I 0 1 0 LU C x - Eft C\I ,- I CO C\I CV ES Eft f C\I (ft I tN •,- , EF} Eft' Eft 1Eft!,- C\I , CV I C.U- Lli •'=. Co .---H Ef, Ea tft e3 1 Eft 'Eft Eft I , I I Eft Eft J Eft C`• Ea i 0 I ti; o ; e 3! 1 1 1 ! c•• c• u.1 4.0 ...1 1 1 1 c - , ZCI) I ' • 1 ._ L. L.: I-: 1 L: I ' L Li 0.1 ...,p , L L I 04 :E.. 17;I "ti) V) CA i tii VII c-`7; CCICI InI co E0 -F-: IggggC c COC !0 ' >, o)! c c iol -0 -(7) , >, lc ol C co I- o 0.1 0 01 0 0 0 Ce o o .c) 0 01 = olcu lo 0 ; I o 0:.7. < . 06 >, -E 0 ' 06 06 06 06 06 0 . ,-..--: 1.-= 0 1 0 06 1 ....-r. c.) 05(9 :..... •r_- c, C C C C 2 C 2. c2 C C ! C1 s.- C L C 0. Z > o .g; .0)1 .c) .c:r) .cr) p) -7) .0) 1--ni .0) 17; .o) .c3)! Lli 2 TS 2 = "c-'13) al "g "cgi "115) 1 Si "al C (1))1E "061 ci-13) cclita;. -(9) (1)) cS "(Tr Fi5) S `all in z < 0 tr) 0! 0 , cyccgcu 0 ! c) 000100 0 ! rola_ ELacc-.) 000 < c0 7 10> (1) . -5 ..L'a a) cn U) E -I a) c -; c _ c cn c c 0 ta. 0 e' "a c ° c:i - -d 'E' -1- c ,_ a) c >, }-- >, E cci 13 f) 0 0 0 „, cu 0 *4i .2 7,-2 t C . -a --E- . Co "' °1-- ct3 _a) (13 ....1.5. - . (i) .: a E E c-- 'E -.0- cs) --.', cn ,- = 0 '13 Co a) co 7. a) a) •=- CD - C 0C1) -•' " "- ,._ .4_, ,_ a) 0 _c c.) a) ,_ ,_ ,_ ,_ Co co ---- -.,-„- cl) (NJ o = C -- -zr c W W -.,t7, .4_, 1-_-, -0 2:-1- ID _cm = - --- -c --- CD a3 0 r__ Z mC E c c - CI) C -C CO 0 Co = C13 _,_ s- 0 -c15 a s._ r- ... (1) a) 73 -J n cion. a) -- E -1- -(7) 2 0 ?EicaLaczt, 0 . -7 cuo _ c .(13 0 cu C __I 0 a , _c , -0 (L-ti 2 0 „c 0 wEEcuoc - c(13 cl) V. --E8X0 Lii 0 Co I-- z a) __I 2 c < re o (13 3 co 2 a- cm a d - °6 - - IT ) ci.) Cli -= .: 0- 4,-; if, 2 1-,4) r_u) E ,c 0 co 8 t ..-,, 0 -.. ..= r) ad) Co 2 0 t5 z Coa .> . > z > -- > 0 ee (-) cp -coa2 ,1C- 1,; "E 2 ‘:= 014.2u) 2 :0 co 4 2 0 TA cS 0 -- -c- 6- . 6 c a) co vo co 7: - "C3 .- ....." C IX 0 3 -2 - TD3 .ct t w 2 5 r. '4(73 0 ID z .52 (9 7; co > co -,_- co t RI " RS .,_- a_ 42 ci. (.) cp cn co '5 c (1) c o CD 73 CD 73 (D "C3 a) 0 -5 oti o > a) (1"3 ° (1) 73cD0aic saicec2 ° Wc < 15 oco _ R- o -E-th -ogo > a, > > a) > a) 0 a, C cECEcc u- E a) _a) -6 (2 --0- 0 0, .s 0 a) < ,- < 0 < ".12 < 72 >, a) >, = Co co cumascacuctl -a, t >, 0- >,© 0 co -1 c: 0 0 -0 W Lii 0 175 17) rin (-7) ,- 12 C° ° I- 0 L. as 0 0 0 L._ s_. L. s_. Co CO Co Co Co Co ._ •_ Z a. Z CO CO 0 0 W ii: it LE it I I j .....i J J 4- I 0 lu < co < < 0 < < co 0 0 0 < i < 0 0> iii r., 0 .o oa c 2 O. ....11 ...., , C CH 1.1. CD 0; fa= CD CV .0 0 0 477. CV CV .2 - IA ••-• .1:3 C tri III, .0 0 •- C a) C c a) a) 01 o c o o c c a 0 .- '0 4- a)1 C) a) a) (13 a..) 0 _ct 0 -0 . '11) E 0 0 o .... 0 (N >,I -.-, (i) ,- E. 0 .0 - 2 0) C) -,c). cu a) a)I a3 3 co ...... 15 o (1) ) it. 13I as 0 E -0 I --1 -0 _0 ---. -- 1- cti cp 2! -9 9 9_, , .Act ..0 1 12 (i) CL a. ce 0_1 CI)I ca..1 ca..! 1 F) ()1 II II II , .:::,:„.:.:,,„ ' 'Oe.':i'Sia ii•. 0 'agg INN hit III '...1.:...1...!...1....1„.1.1,.1..1.,..1..1i..„.i.,!.. ' og 1 ,.. ..„..• ,• ,...... . , - ..••• .• ...• •,•2:,,,,:„,,,, .,:,,,,, 214 CO CO M an - - . igii,Iiim inim ...„...„, ' !lig 1'111 0 .,,,,,..-„,..., ,.../..,,..,••' -,..,.., ....,..• .,••• %fp,' ;:.:.....-4, ---,„ CM CD 2; 12- oit rilullov ...... . . .,...... 1 11$ :7....,,,.., CN (N 'itt 0 t, 1 1 Vird 1 4.Vg•:;., 0 CD CI , qiiaiE 0 mil , vom • • ce) , • c-.3 0 1 at .,. > — .m. —, , CD CNI I ii, 4 Sol iigati 1 051.t , Vt .:•mot 00 , tA!W•li •,= _ ......, ....rais'..%.-......-... 0 , 1 4t.,,g gg dii AkiPMA •E: a , w o lia. 1 tOk. ... '... ....4.6. --,-- (..) 0 1 la air: 115i 1 , 4ii,2 1 ••.,,,. a.,,. ,:,:qg.• min las , 0 w cY) Cl) Ca 6 ›- a) .......„......,,,ge la gym , ....... ajt o ce ,.:1„:,:,:!:,: 1 0 010 01 0,- 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 ,-- .,.- 01 0 01 0 0 N. co LC) co L.0 Lt.)!0 0 I T-I 0 0 I Cr) N. 01 0 fa I •71- r', 0 (a h.- I N- te 1 T.'"' 0 1 Ea Ea N-- LO CO LO 1 CO CO I 0 •• " 0 1 "r-I CY) W-1 Ca In ,-- 0 ' CY) 'Cr ,-- Ea HI. "I ,--f CO C\il CO_ (\JIM_ NIC ....C.) Ce In 0 CD `.1*- e3 1.1-- CO- ta ta 05 -I 0 .7) o -541 1 Eoty Ee j Ea co , , I o Cool ()DT- oloo oo o LU CO.criol CI a o CO co N- lo h- o ino a. 1-- 11' c, ,- co L.0 1 te co ,---I c0 LU CO Cr) cr) N I Eft I N In I C)I V) CO l•-•• '4. N- I C\I vc- C\I N-- 0 w "c se - cv i (ft Ea N I Ea Ea 1,--• N ta Ea N 1 Ea I I(ft ,--I El,I N Ea I Ea Ea. Ea v- Ea I,- te N LL. w .t-. -- :.13 Ea I Ea I I Ea te Ea Ea I Ea 'Ea I Ea 0 1 Iii 0 , , I_ co L1J to) -.1 I I i 1 , . I Z1 • •' •I • L11 Ce -ti;i ii) -165 U) U)s in 1 U) TA -ti;1 VI E 0 c C o c co c c c c, C ico oco o ,.. c c c C 1 --. 0 o o o C C C C I— 0 o ou -...--: o loo (jou ,...) ...., 1....-. .... ; loo o c) o ...,. io Ho o io 47: ....--: ....-..: 1....-. Ce '-a 05 0 *5 0 0 05 06 S.? ) oa I oo _(:, 05 oo od 05 u C.) 0 ' C) C c 2 c c ' 2Ci'_'"_, C cll.': c C CC C C c = = C t- C C L.- C 0. Z cp 3 LI .cr) p) TA p) p) 1-1) p)Hn p) p) 17; p) p) .cr) p) p)1 p) p) 1-,1) .cn 1-/) .co.-4(7) .cn 1-1) Z— Wu) (7 c7)1 = U.) (7) c Fniccni 7) c c75 I ie3 I 7) c (75 U) U) (/) iii CFn" C "(75 C U) C -IL. w a)I a)1 o a) a) o a)1 o a) a) o a)I a)I a) o a) a) a) a) CD 0 CD 0 CD 0 CD 0 C3 z °- CI 0 0 10 0 co 0 ,0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 1co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.) c , < TC) .ai .0 a) E a) CD CD a) cn E E -1 E -4- a) c co E E E CC) 2 . 0 . ._ E c.) c/2 a) CD CD C a) o •-- cn > - 2 u) . -711. > > > o a3 -5 (55 . la -- :----. 0 >, 2 2 c•-- :5 , -I- ›.- C.) 6cE -1E2eL 82 a- (no (13 E .E cna) cc E E E = ) -2 0) m - c = .(33: "- C cu -.a) 3' *"ei - -= = c) LLJ 111 ._ -J -.) C ;; >, Cc "- "ri) , (t3E 7). ‘-) - ..?..‘ ccrnc C C C) 00 > . 0 0 o >.% ' ° -.?'.„, ,-.,e „co ' t- = —.1 0 a H0 o —a, Li_.— cn ,r m ,-- a) ,, ,t• a) > , 0 4- 0 0 = - " - 4 - c 1/4-) b c ° c.) -'-' "=. Ea_ 1/4-) 4`il 12 0 CC 0 ac c (2 0 E.-- - cu i c) • (t) . so o .. - 0 as u) F- 0 cu C13 i.- CU cia CD . - U) >14( a. ".....- > a) - cn co -'-' 0 -- (I) cn 0 0 = 0 oa 0 - ' - i- a) -a (1) a) 0) -1 u) ' ti C tV1 .)-7- 73 -C3 li-a) 16 c-.1-.) cl.) -.'7.- ai t 06 r n° -0 •17.- I- 45 (4 ci) cn - • LCT) -Po (/) 1?) .....- CO • -L' • . • va a) o =..E- .__.E- cuc _j.E- a 9 -,-,,L- ..2 o 0 •_-:-j ___E Ct R I X 2 (t ta 3 W 2 -0 2 cu as —1 —1 ,, w 0 u) > 0 > - ,_ — a) Lda) , cuma) al a) - 0 n oes (13 = C = C -t ct a3 c C N -00 - CCCC .0 (DC C ..-, C C (1) < t; , C 0 0 0 a) 0 0 _j -0 •C) .CU 0 0 " 0 Cn 8 0 0 L-_ ... 7.-- 17) *i= C 'C.: 0 -c: ,= CI3 ° -00 -00 0 ° CCOC ° -CO -CCDMMCOCOCD CD L- CD 0 CD a) c Ljz 2 .4), g -Q 1-- -a a) al Th- c..) 0 c - c - i-ins al (I3 (13 cu ca o a, (13 co cu Q=. -c ..c (13 (13 ca c13 a3 Z a. z ...i -J ...i --1 --I -J Z Z it W . (1) (1) F- 1- F- F- H 4- 4- a 2 0 0 0 < 0 03 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 < < 03 0 0 sr: 0 .o oa . 2 0. w +r 1..it LI:+ O L a. c I 0 F- ._ X X E •w C ^ M C co ._ a) c c s_ a) 4- CD 1 cu E c! C co 0 cu J O O i a) 0 2 i , ..., a) cti C 45 a) ..., 8, �' c a 0) E 2 C) m O N I 0 1 • "0 17 c, W CD c V) Q. I ! i O C a. co 0 0 I 0 Z f- II II II I Co Co .O 1L-; in 0 111111 , I ii OO' j ss S 1 1 .{s . 4.:.*. I �y s� M CO 1 1 0 I :,.7,,,,,;,:',:.1 0 o Cl, r- r- O . . M O i :..4-6.,isj i s, ''.,,':..;'','.':''':13'" ^1 01 I I ;:r 41, �f;r;*i lilr /� N .I ���. 0 /. L. 0 :. y 1 I . cr :::::Z ._ O {.t W (7) Tj O • F Nh Find V♦ Lt. CI) Z ;4;5 :r l'< '" ct g Ta: g c- Q L- C.. F.: C:• I C.. Com• C.. ry CI) CD 0 0 o of 2 o o 2 01 0 0 0 0► o 0 In ea ea 1 co e}1 = ea tag. L L `p Ea M Eft Ea Ea Ea V L L I a) a) a) . a) J y O ,;,r c.. .c c.• c.. O O Q i cam• .., cam• r• c . ( 1 m LL 0 T. C`• y... Cl-• 4._ Cl-.14- C.. 4_ O O ' O LC) 1 0 0 O 0' 0� O 0 a LLJ Efy I (0 i-- c � Oc co_ Cl,I a) I a) N Lo I— cNy I I CO0N I d• 0 LL. - X 2 I ea 0 (A. 0 to Ef} O 1 0 LLQ Ef? { 6F} Ea.N W I �:+ U i C.. C.. c.• C.. C.• Cl-- C.. c•- c•-•= W 40 J r• r• c• c'• Cc.: c: c: �: I W L• L L L L L L 1 L L + L L-I L I L L 2 0 I CI c C C C C C CI C C ( 0 0 c c •Co cA in' I— 0 U O c0) U U c) U O O O O O cv 0 0 0 U U U U U 0 U U U < = :42-L. I C C C C c� C CI c c c i C ) Co• C c Q. Z > U > • v_) 0 0) I 0) v_) a Z .0) 0) c >, 0 0► 0) •Co C • • W +-' U) _� •v) •Co •Co 'cn 'cn cn I 7) 6.5 — c) cn 'm El cn •c Co• 0 Z Q D � j D . 0 0 D � a) a) a)I a) Z a) i a) L c a), a) a) ZDI 0 • DI DI Z DI DYD cDD DID QQ a- >, � -0 J 0- c a c o c F- E U I- c _0 ") CD a) > 45 >. 0 45 E cu U c o o v) a. W W •_, 0 -o co LU ° c U al c o E •� CU CU Z. U J O C a) N co C O .D - (U a) a) Q .0 a) re 0 c O cTS (13 o U _ O O s •� ca, a. o � Q a o }, L L L U L� C- J 0 c •>� CD O o cv C �., C O o� co O . CU 0 ca 2 co co cu CZ ♦., >� - L a) L C O O L O to o L u- C C --I C c J C o� C o� c o� C CY 0 Co +-r -0 C -0 .0 ft O olS cu cu v 0 v cn cn c/) ( () C c _ u -g•_ c, -II alU 8 (-) 8 4-5 •L •L 'L � 0 L .� O LL 0 co 15 a) .� O co O •c 0 .cu .cu 0 �c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q L c O Q 0 -(Cf .- O •,--. E c c M c E c -oc E c E c c F c cmc o c c .0 M C c V L co .� .� co co .0 ca co (0 CD CD CD O L 0 CD 0 Z a Z Cl) i) I _1 _i Z Z Z f- F- h- CO 0 F- -J I- Q < < CO < °° 0 0 m U < 0°° p. m m m a a • U o 06L L. C a. --I r— —I 0 CO > ---1 —I --I Z Z Z I— I— 1 CD Cf) 3 > 0 .._• SIM=• .5. L. * 0 a) ° CD LI CD pi a) pi 0i) cl) = "j..M1 MaD (0 * 3 * g2_,- ,,::33 'il = = = -I I-5 —5 CQ Co C.Q ma) am =oj oi ..0. 0 z x O CD � x CD CD CD-� � � CD � * o _. _. _. C 0 toc_ x ca. � CD � O � rn 0 rn cp CD CD Q° Q° Q° r-i- r0 � � cp CD * n m n < a) 01) O 9° 2° 7CD -1 -T1 a) -0 r �• 7:/ CD �-I, cp rCI = a "C -C3 P-' '" -Tl Cn � - ri I- �- > rn Di CD —. pa C_ C� CD z -< -3 z Cn = CJ -I =} z = @ = CD � -� C) r-i- C7 O = o z CO la (CD� �' z QJ r-i ° = Eu _ DO 0 = a) 0 - CD CD CD 0- CD * O = a) a. CD `C 0 0- = 0 o = r-4- a) Cn O 3 a) ,7--i: rfl.: X 01) 0- 1-.5 (/) X CD C13 x = Pfl M 0 cnX cn • = _ —. _ -0 = O rn 0 rn 3 LI) cnm 0 — m -n= r•-t- CD c 0 O Cn �- x • •• -- eL W 0 O = = = = = = = = = co -I 0):. 13 ° -1 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD — — rn a) —• Ci 0 0 11 ..., Z Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn cl) 11 X oLU - TI —. a —. —• —. —• —• . ,..t.r+ �-+. C.CD Cn -• CC-2" CQ C 3 co co co Co co -- -- C7 0 -- 0 0 = 0 o o to cn tD 0 U rn = = rn ri- CD Sv Sv 0a iv a) iv E U) cn O z O 0 Qo m Z -� C7 o A o r O r- -n CD -3- - o CTy CD Cn 13- - C Ca. ' CD � CT C' O Cl CO v' 0 CD Z CD r (-R 3 = ci. r.i.. 3 = "V -5 * 3 a u) 7- o •co e- x x cn , , ,,,,,,,„ ........................,..............,•....:....:.:.:.:.:.:.: Iiiiiiqi:.:i::•., ..0 :::::imagilinigl!i!i!.:.!ii!!i!i!::.i!!:::: coo, 0= ...) -N) -N) ,:„:i: ::-:„:, ::.::..::..::..:.•••••ii.•..:•:i.::..:••••••••• 1!:!:!.:!:!.i:!:qi.i0, I -0- --0 . -•••••"......i::::::::::::::.:.:.:::::, - -, ...) ,:::imi.:ii.:: -Ni.) .::::::E .: inin.:::::::::::::::::::::::•:.:, Cri :j 3 O CO ;.?s##s'f> >�%ss.,:': $>:# s<?sissy CD O i /10*-1,-,:,,,g,,,,,wak,rliii All :i5 ff.':5:5'15`#ff•.,;sF: 49;";:,;,A ..d '^tisk; O ' ..... ':ills,:;<i... �� Teal h a eta '421,15-11, o .,i. ::'•.,Sy'::r2:' ;Cgifilli / 4,911 ir.) 'i n n� h f5;;,}t'i gia �I' 3 yropi s', .. O 'YH f •.:0..''fvf5'FF: Im##5�'�''. !:' Kf.f:#,off:; W • • '• #;,sus �';:,i.j'��$.•`•� O 1 1 ##� 'Sft"f.Ff#f.5.. P.,„•'4:ir :�i.X55:.y z:��''svi5ukf f:ts5i #�% V ,r�<i��``1'1';ISM"j O 1 1 AA CO CO > yrff,sv/:i: o rrr --n -na › 0 r- s � _, _, rn (� C� 0000 O o oi) w LI) n) DJ Sv -� DF5. :5• -, -� cn Cn cn (n C ) rr 1o z C� C) C� C) a. �. �- �- '--'- '-' 001/4‹ Ct) ) CD k< k< DDDR0 0co 0 0QC C C CO _- �- 73 pia) a) C1) CCD_ CD CDD _ . Cn CD o cD rn O oi) a) oi) 0.) L'ci o <a_ ca. Cn Ci) O nQOOCD CD -o r a) -h CD�, Cn r r0 0Q Qo -1 CD - .- rn = ;:=1- 4- › 0 z "<-.3 -5 --I -� Or--I- -1 -1- `CC —• —MI zC CZ -� ■ V z O 0 m '„♦. rn Z H = 3 0 -- — — 0 a) x = cp — __, -o -0 E3 i pi L, = r-Pe (11) sv Z 0 CT a) O -5 * Ca. (1) 1; Z-11 = a) n- = XCi) = = on --I 3 3 (D = cZ * * cn = = cn (,)6-6 u = n ,-1--- CD a) = O _, rn i� Cn Cn 0 CD rn .. CD = CD CDr-i - , 11 (i) • O x •• * o0x !--- Ek ) — A) 0 0 m __I r- r- ----1 03 X §. -.,. r-i -I a) Oa I:. 13 c= _.< ,0 ° CD p 0 O cc?) o — o Ti = 3 3 =CD c7 O C} = F.D." = CIS o 7 g CD CD CD u) �+ CT' < Cn CD i+ Ti O M=. 5- 'r .4- 0 -3 0) 0 -IQ. Cn (� E O ° UCD ' (D CE ._ . a � = 93 --I -1 . 0- ti) K 0 C7 b-P' iv I 0 20 � CQ ,-1- p O c O , = 0) CD CD CD -11 CD „,--1 (1) * cn • ED CT r+- C = E ° — CC) Cn - o 2 C o0 r-�- CD — ED 0 CD N CD r 0 * -4, N CD CD -P5 — --1 o 1 CT = w = CD U) r 3 = ca.. (1) o • Q • = x Cl)cn co co t7 (D O CD = 4%1; to � y<; K.}z Y as co t.# :a O _■ IV+z» '�i•# : `' £- S..H{F4S:y :* vC< atF O f O •. 9g k f J qy3 " i •:: ! YS. '.47 , F.'tX ' f�+ �,( fcz•'^ ;<.:,}4 %� ii� ?. A; „ %—°}�t•? ,v •ztta#yu;? #E i. .. # F.;%, �f£•:.::• : ..ri: a" "EON " .%4Wrq.iffe.:5:; D. ,O1J� r3Y£'/,4➢ #:wfX s:#51.S: ✓ (D Atli Hhi . ur : ia 9 .O ,^ tv 1-71101 3 \D.£`.#f�y:%'rir> iNyL„. 1.4:00 �n . }:wf :S :`.f+FQE � O,* . �ft h � r: a;Ea. W • •.f�;:FF% 0} sem z: }:,3^£ " �.rxxy: .a ^xfFs,,.,;:; k.z�:' >»r':4 t fiXEµ:'ti#?-,: 0:WS>.; <i9 >; 0 O O: "# ' � >1a. fr.),S.fy i:� 'C^ Os; ''- §,e,',A3:, `z.�",� f 1. ;Y,` /FW. :'FF : V/.:'{zr"rFh f 't. r#ySfFir;; 'FS.. 'br/1041;41 F : :;';• 4o} CO �.%>�i^�i11 (0 (lignit :£ .3 ; ^ " : li IJ. 'sF,,i , zaiKRYlV,i 6*1l/ pit& t: ll ti:, S yy-__► IIIYYYYYII . 1 --1 ---1 --i --1 -1WW707073 — I— r- r- r r- r- ° > 0 cl) ci) CI) il) OJ = =" <. O S.v S1� � SD C1) �• Q = = = = = a) u) Cp � � 0 ) o 0C71CCCQ CO CO CO CDCD ° ° =cD CD cp cD, CD su = OO-3 -5 -I --/ -/- 0 0 O00 C.. X • o O O ox � — rvWW ; ril 0 0 <CDo cD o �7 . _. _. O - _ —. u) • -I - ED = = < < O0X7) 77UO OOO � CpCD � v r r 0 _ p_ p_ 0- . > rn — ,. 0 C7 O p 0 W- * sn • (n - (n < Z -< a. (n (/) wCpn z O0OH — ,--i- 0 ti) * i' l r-1- et, ril- _ * F... 0 00 0_ — . O coxn -- - -- — _- Q _ CD x (IT 3 3 3 cr -1 ta. (P (7)' 3 a) * -0 3 73 -5 cn -0 -0 -0 tl) 3 7:9 1 rjj 0 1 73 = 'D ,-.4- .1 rn 1 k, ,.._. C m U) K m --i i i * R. 3 _.• 3 . 3 o —1 • 3 3 3 3 r— = 3 O -, u eu li.. �-�- r-t- -� r-+ O • ,--4- r-t- �*' (n (n ' Cn cn cn (n r- << (n • o -1 .. I I"' -H * o (, o5.K _■ „ c� O < _. O 7O O7cD o rn IN la7 p 7r O * CS = =I. O S 3 O O m* CDO 0 . SD = = -- Qo N = Cp 0Cn - O Cn- 7 r (7) C/) _ .--.- --1 -EU I-3 3 c _. c _. rn z �+ , r CSD Q , • c o_ r.+ riit, ;1 (/) 0 7.4: Z ° et” 0 (/) 1. 0 CD I Z ti) 0 cn C ,-1-ri+ i--+- P.+ 0i) —- .t. -ri ET -4, -ri = -I ((in) -o .1. 0 0 CD SD 0 < 1 —- S1) = CD —?. Q) ,�. C,7 ea 00 = — S� cn — p 0 = =cp r eL cn 3 a) 3 cn < (1) r r--1, riti CD B o cn * r-4 X cn co0 op m- coo 0 k"µkkk;y} f `k}r zxtX kv:, rik„; a K tki.' ': W o }. :hof ' };':y�::Y2 � ?PAZ;wih;'2 :,}2>."^^`.h'�t,i2Y•' <l 2..\` x F'{��{' �/� iia FFyF EIn** f #, , ilia ';; O \_"";��;'r9.Gf' if#�kJ�; Sf{;: .y4'2�C`' y J`;" �• �it ;'#ij2;r`.2 { y:; .,.::,.4;11 :,. , ` ,,Ef ':S 22ti, 2 '}�.},S:S:."$f co , F . s O eili' 'lit .?4,..,,,.,0,,r: .: ; ;t}:,iFa.,.:1>•:36rlu'fg!•',ce ,3" P° 'j; # oeF2i2b''d2 , ,quid tiik fil 77.00A 0 .4k fF£2;'.5ir't`sib+}t 2 -qty�Ff::f#.v"Srrk:� iiitia rwz ll \ \^V S .kfff#;fF�. . • ;n ...... `SSEf>.44.,..„.,,,,47,77 "'`% C _, _.1.„' {:Iilta O 011 1 , r ' C 1 1 .4t,,,Hei N) N !ij S:•2':}s>",:^�;;h�f.f:£>::o..S,#�.<xt f;:"':'s,F Ifw„.Mlllllh ' � ' 1 1„? tx *OM `, z sYi• F:z LS .: O (/ moia ,F £qkilta" .^ S, ti. co ot,r,,,s i}%f, .rtfii4E , rS ' -was ,,,,,,,,,sit � �� £PJtey5::' ' %' >, KKSi #}YLfnp Ca . � v� Y: , "gV.:,n,^% %k•,:0 �% ,: t}' c: •� - - K \12yfb ___ 1 1 , 1...,, 9 9 ... 8 ,..---- „.„.,..... ...„,.,,,,,,,„„:,„„..,_,.............._, .....,,,....,ii.„............,.........,,.„„...., ............... ,...„. . rho' .. ,, . „,. ....... ..... _. . , . . ,_,_ , , . • • •, - , .. , .... • . . . .,...,.. ,,,.... . . , . . . .. .. . . ...•......... . . 2 , . . ., ... ., ... . . .... .... , . , ........ .....r.f': v, 4 ,‘, . ,.„. - - .• • .' -, ' ' = ..•••.•-•,In.. ..... • ' • •- - NIV-Sti, , "Sir \ *,'' . 1 • ..-- -• • -.. i. . .•.., • .•. , , . ........- •-. . : r-1111v •-• .,;.,,„,,,,,,* . . ' .,....,,,,.„.. .A1,•_ , z••••-•. xi i • --•:•'•• 1=..--•---_-. --- - '-"I''' 0 , , ._. ...,,,,,, sill ' ‘ - , . .V1111414* • A-Vr”. -.— ,,,,,..-.... .attie.,_ ,.__ ,,,i,,,._t,te.... , -..- 4,4,.',.rif ..„,,„ ,- .„,......--,,_. iiii.,. .-..--,. ,.,.. i i i_...... I ., ,- _..- , -„,-, . .., ...... . ...._----- ... . . 2 . , ,'''..',,i, '74,•:, t;);,:,,,_. ; ., ,, ...., ,t 47: ip. , , 0 . - AV , • ,.,. --. ...-N .,...- --"- li .._...... •..._,, „...... . -....., .... e . , . ,- _ ,,....„.,..„,,, , ...,—;--,, 1, ,I P. • 4 , • 7.,, ,„, , f takesoi * 4. , .r. • lik ., . ••• ... ... ,,..,.. 1 1, mow. .2., . ~Ism lik. • ...,,,, /,,, , I T •, ..... ,', , ,. I glif' 1, ,,,.„ --...,, , , .:'''. ,", ...L.••,,,, -,.,...,„ , ,,,,„, . It.,•r•..,,--- .4°A . ,., , • 1 . -,,,, ,, . , ._.„... i: - •,,......??;1'1' 1:. ! , ' , ;,..0 :i Milu N,,: ,,‘.,,, ., ,• ,.4,4..., to,' ,'„, rtinrs4", 11 tiin :,„i,.., , , ' — ___ . . , . . , :ra4r,ll' ipry, ' —'6i. i " 1110 „ * ,,.,!.';-,„:,-itiv,„••-,••..„ ,k••••:-- •..' ,..... S 4-,,, • . . .i -c , ;,. z 2z?!5.,..„, '..,,,,,,A1.:.:1.4... - N,, • v I ,..„p• - i . 40.,,tt u.,,.' , • , •,• _ ..),...---- ,-, i • :,„-F'.-:' ,',4 ,_ .......... ,,,..„0Nop _.... .. .......;_.......,„..,. ...._ ..... ..... , , ,..„ . ...,,, . Ot .7:7_, „ -.,,,,,,!ZI.,2,,,,,,e' . ' ,.... 1...r.".4,5,,,.."-,,,,, g 11 . ,,... , ..... ,------,...,, — -----,--,,,r--.......?." . ....- ,... -.,,, ,. , ,,, ..„,,SP ••• ...-"7*'..• - . ..... ^- N. .'' '". '' ..,.7,1',.. :....; .', .,:. • pi - * 4 .......-- tri ___,. . ,... .\ ;',. ...,,.. ... _ R i 4 t a 0,4!!!! ns ro.-1 r:1 , , .,....., 777:......,,,,..- , - .. l•'..:. ,_ ,,„:„.; -- i ,„„,, , 1 ..t..,. / %. 1 4'-..-4'a- -'' ,......,,, ... ,,.I, we , , tit\, SAH AFIIr Adopted May 27,1998 . I am' -;11; .; 1 ' ,1/4 '';: 'es 3Z= •— ' •--- - ,, , -,,,. g:‘ i 0. rTin... . , , . .. „ , ., , , , , ,„ , . . , , , , , ,,, , , . .,,,, , , , , , .. ,.., ...,.. ...,.„,,„ ,„,,,,,„„ ,., ..1 I I I I I I P A Disclaimer G M The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is T responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. P The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard specification or regulation. — PAC Metropli6an Transportaton Plan 9 9 Acknowledgments Ihru Development of this Plan has been accomplished in cooperation with,and financed by,the United 2 States Department of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration,the Federal Transit U Administration,and the State of Arizona Department of Transportation through the Pima Association 2 of Governments(PAG). 0 1998 PAG Regional Council Paul Parisi,Vice Mayor George Miller,Mayor Ora Harn,Mayor Town of Oro Valley City of Tucson Town of Marana Sharon Bronson Vivian Tiemeier,Mayor Shirley Villegas,Mayor Board of Supervisors Town of Sahuarita City of South Tucson Pima County Katie Dusenberry Thomas L.Swanson State Transportation Board PAG Executive Director Representative PAG Management Committee Luis Gutierrez,City Manager Charles Huckelberry Mike Hein,Manager City of Tucson Administrator Town of Marana Pima County Chuck Sweet,Manager Anne Parrish,Manager Rene Gastelum,Manager Town of Oro Valley Town of Sahuarita City of South Tucson 1998 Transportation Planning Committee Membership David Atler Susan Bartlett(Ex-Officio) W.Lee Burner II,Gen.Mgr. Public Works Director University of Arizona Sun Tran Town of Marana Bill Clark Katie Dusenberry,Member Jim Glock(Chair) Pima County Planning State Transportation Board Tucson Dept.of Transportation Transportation Bill Higgins David Hook,Town Engineer Jay Klagge AZ Dept.of Transportation Town of Oro Valley AZ Dept.of Transportation Andra Juniel(Ex-Officio) Brooks Keenan(Vice Chair) Jim Mazzocco AZ Dept.of Envir.Quality - Director Pima County Planning Pima County Dept.of and Develop.Serv.Dept. Transportation Jill Merrick,Planning Dir. Dennis Mittelstedt(Ex-Officio) Tony Paez,Director Tucson Airport Authority Federal Highway Administration City of Tucson Dept.of Transportation Geno Patriarca(Ex-Officio) Rene Reddog(Ex-Officio) Richard Salaz Davis Monthan Air Force Base Director City of South Tucson Research&Planning Tohono O'Odham Nation Thomas L.Swanson(Ex-Officio) William Vasko,Director Joe Weidman Pima Assoc.of Governments Tucson Planning Dept. Citizen's Transportation Advisory Committee Advisory Committee David A.Williams Town of Sahuarita Pima Association of Governments Thomas L.Swanson James D.Altenstadter Cherie Campbell Executive Director Deputy Director Transportation Planning Manager The Consulting Team SAIC Transportation Consulting Group(prime) Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade&Douglas Kaneen Advertising&Public Relations Curtis Lueck&Associates For Transportation Matters Only Acknowledgments P A Acronyms CO Carbon Monoxide T FMS Freeway Management System P ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems MTP Metropolitan Transportation Plan O&M Operations and Maintenance PAG Pima Association of Governments PIP Public Involvement Program RASP Regional Aviation System Plan VMT Vehicle-Miles of Travel PAG Metropg6an Transportaton Plan • •`• :$ •: • ! '.!• MA GT �::•� : ii;!,;0:)., r."77,in.7., ,!,;,„,7:,:, P Page1Tabler.,;.itiliglitiliiiiiiiiiiiiiE;;;7. P :y'i{µm ••.of Contents . > •rY \� ff ••Purpose of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan :Plan Goalsyti ..� y.u gh 20 0 :YstemNeedsThro 5 : .�;- Y -;:f..M:i:17:1:.! W: .:i.s ::Re ►onal Growth annddTToratavleSl Ex►sting SYst mo5 i : : . : Jr6Af: :1171:. oMeRtroopadowl►atanImTrParnsv mretantts►on Plan Qverview iii it:!i ts 12 ; •ir. f 7A lTTrr avnelitDImemronvd mMannag12 3 ',,iiittt �Project/ProgramseImmenr t v mog natss t Costsosts2OBitchY crIe andaPedestrian lm rov mn 23 :: • :' � �23 � 1 \ : ii'. M XIITMTP iCtoasntdsnOSth r Alternative Mode • T ' ' v' : \;i"'"3 '•: � : l l: . ::`•'TToottaalonaI Avi tio � •titi25 v :: *:::•:::i:::"::i:01 :Re l Plan :.: � :FinanciastemPlan (RASP) : . .:. ........26 • }::.A tionPl n 27Transportation System Performance Public Involvement List of Exhibits Page Exhibit 1 PAG Region Population and Employment (1970-2020) 3 Exhibit 2 Roadway Capacity Improvements by Year 2020 7 Exhibit 3 Other Non-Capacity Roadway Improvements by Year 2020 91 Exhibit 4 Roadway Improvements Summary Table 11 Exhibit 5 Sun Tran Local Fixed Route Frequency of Service by Year 2020 13 Exhibit 6 Sun Tran Express Peak Hour Bus Trips by Year 2020 15 Exhibit 7 Sun Tran Local Fixed Route Service Expansion by Year 2020 17 Exhibit 8 Sun Tran Express Service Expansion by Year 2020 19 Exhibit 9 21 Paratransit, Local Circulator, and Rural Transit Service by Year 2020 Exhibit 10 Cost of Transit and Other Improvements by Project Type 23 Exhibit 11 MTP Cost Summary 24 PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan P A SummaryM PURPOSE OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN The Pima Association of Governments (PAG) Metropolitan Transportation Plan, or MTP, provides a 22- year vision for a balanced, multimodal and sustainable transportation system for eastern Pima County. The MTP was adopted on May 27, 1998 by the PAG Regional Council, and replaces the previous metropolitan trans- portation plan, adopted in the fall of 1994. The PAG Regional Council consists of elected off i- cial from the Town of Maranarana, the Town of 1.1111111111.1111pIrrm!so:::: ,i,,„„.:::,,,:,.:.... .. . Tucs0nmetr0area9Oro VaIIeY Pima CountY the CitY of Euelsoillopollappoilliamiji!pli.ii.i.iiii!lim:,iF,Et2 :ia::9.8 Tucson,c son the Town of ah u rita S a theC it of Y •.ti 0 South Tucson, and a representative f •.�..Y: ::. �- titi: •:{{•t :. }•• ..▪ Y' : theArizona State Transportation Boar-.. .:: :r. •r' :.tib• :.::... ........... ::.:::: ..::......... :.:::::.................:. .: ... .........: /\ •.v: :fix• `:.r:.fi'•: ::'ti .f. .r.... 'C:•.••• r:::r.�::;r:;:}:}::$::'r'r'r:v{}}'r::::}:ti::;'r: titi}:{:r:r}:::{•'r:i::::;:;:;:ti{::::;::•:: This Ian meets new bro r .^!!C•:':':..JC: •:•i:iOC.�%•':•:::' ?-' ':i:?::::'r:.. :r;. •..ti••.•.xti:;:Ltif;{...J.}v�:'J'�}:•:':'r:v}:ti{::•:titi::{: Federal requirements for transportation Q:u: - :<:::::::: :ff Y':::::}:f}::.::::::.::• .r M.V.;r •J :' •.� T17:::;.:.•;:":. •{.'.::•.. •.Y r.}:• 7VYI•..J\.:Q•::!::'•;::: planning and air quality established as �. :� . . :. �,,..,� .�.�: .v�.� ..•_ .#.`#• ..rj: �; � ;yr part of the 1991 Intermodal Surface '� " #• 'r ` Transportation Efficiency 'ffi Y. =ri•,,- .> p Act, o r ,� Z.ox.♦rte.. y'"-tG;' 7+'00"!^0 • ISTEA. ..,?hy .,K;: w•::•r. .v.�..v`v}:a:••,.•`'.,•:!1cp���\.Ml `4� ' a w.• ..•,.,,;.y_ 1.^,/ `vim^hV ;:•' •.`..�.•J The MTP addresses transportation facilities and services Y^^: in eastern Pima County, which includes unincorporated Pima County, the City of Tucson, the City of South Tucson, the Town of Marana, the Town of Oro Valley, the Town of Sahuarita, the San Xavier District of the Tohono O'Odham Nation, and the Pascua Yaqui Tribe. The transportation facilities and services include those provided by the Arizona Department of Transportation and other govern- ment agencies. The transportation improvements described in the MTP • will facilitate the movement of people and goods by all modes of transportation within the Tucson metropolitan area. These improvements have been developed to help alleviate congestion, improve safety, provide access to alternative transportation modes, improve transportation system operations, and maintain the region's clean air goals through the year 2020 planning horizon. PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 1 1 9 9 s This document is a summaryof the MTP. The entire Plan thru document can be obtained from the Pima Association of 2 Governments. 0 2 o PLAN GOALS The Metropolitan Transportation Plan includes a set of four overarching goals. These goals served as funda- mental guiding principles for the development of the Plan. It is the balancing of these primary goals that has shaped, constrained and eventually melded the features and com- ponents of the Plan into an identifiable and unified metro- politan transportation system. Specific implementation policies associated with each of the primary goals are provided in the Plan document. The Plan goals consist of the following: Mobility and Accessibility Goal: :::::„:,„:",ogigiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiimpiii.ggin throughout 1 and liglipiii!.:ii:0„:,,„„,::.f.,::,.1, 0., ...,eimigigiiiiiiiiliiiii.T.i..:::iiiiiiiiniiiiiii, �i o e Toimproveh mob t ofe te Y people goods ii.allijoimmil!ii!ii!iiiniiiiiii:;iiiiiiii.iiii;iii,,iiiiminsii.;iiiiiisiiiiiiuiiitaiiiiiiii. the region by p ro vid ngefficient, e ffecti ve convenient, lent .:;iiiiiiii:5.5:;..:::i:ii:i:i..;::::izi::i7i:::i:i::::::::::::::74;:.:::::;;;;!i!:!;!:.!;::::,:::;;;;:;.!::;::::::::::::::::: b/e and safe into � modes o ftranP rp sota o to emt a cce ssY de ina- sired est n otherde and � n medical, m n educa t o et .FX:: .,•.•.Y•Yiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!iiiimiiiiisigiiiiiimounimimspw..!„N J•:.:• •� Itions. =r 'ti ,.�,} \ } w\•.t;.w . fir.........•... .::.,:.::.t:''';:!T: ,:::.. .-;:"4:::4:::.•10.011Z. ..'-'::::'%!igiLI:.!iiiln ::i.,i,i0tiwo:;:,.,;IiMilif".:-:i::: .i.:!..:1.0i.'..:.: =N' Environment and Communit Goal. 1,,,,,::,:.i::::lii;:i:101:::.:,1,A,:.,.7..: ::. ���::::.::'. . :�� .� ��, � ::::�:::< To rotect the natural and built environment from >.:.•.•.. adverse impacts resultingfrom transportation facilities a facilities d v� transportation rv� . ro d :� .< . � •: and se ces To e .I.`• •: :: :: :::::: >::: ::: services iiithat enhance the livabilit and sustamabilit y .•>SCh:•:<.•::::•.w:i.•,:!,;?-:::��ti•�;;.'� ''�:::;:::;:�?:;'.:. Yr.,:wkesieviin,.!:q.!,7; 17::.,,:ir�( ii; of communities within the region. i.lf,':!,4:i;i:4:ii-,ii-giiigiVS::::'-.:-:.:.,:.,,:IN::gefliMi:4%: :: : .-..,::!:.: •�ti , \ J� s1��ti ��.... ..•.�. Financial Feasibility Goal. + h To enhance prospects for the financial feasibility of i thePlan, andassure that revenues are available to 'sf t µ area,1998 achieve the planned transportation improvements. • shown against the metro � P The Sonoran Desert Public Support Goal: To gain public support for the implementation of Plan's components, including the financial underpinnings of the Plan. REGIONAL GROWTH AND TRAVEL The following are important factors affecting regional trav- el and the provision of transportation facilities and servic- es described in the Plan. Page 2 P A Exhibit 1 G PAG Region Population and Employment (1970-2020) M 1200 - T -AO 1000 c 800-- _ IN 00 p 600 t 400 377;5 • 200 ............ ...... 113,10.. 0 -'-'• co rn 0) 0 O 0 r T r r N N N Year ..,., Population Employment Sources: PAG and 1995 Special Census * 1970 population and employment numbers are estimates based on Pima County totals. Population Growth -The population within the PAG plan- ning area has increased from approximately 427,000 res- idents in 1975 to 752,800 in 1995, an increase of over 70 percent in 20 years. The planning area population is pro- jected to increase to over 1.1 million by the year 2020. (See Exhibit 1) Employment - Pima County's employment has grown at an average annual rate of 4.5 percent from 1970 to 1995. Employment is expected to increase from 377,500 in 1995 to 650,000 in 2020. Household Size - Although population in the Tucson area has increased steadily, household size has been declin- ing. By 1990, the average size had dropped to 2.5 per- sons per household, from 3.3 persons per household in 1960. Vehicle-Miles Traveled - The number of daily vehicle- miles traveled (VMT) in the metropolitan area has increased from 1.8 million in 1960 to 15.6 million in 1995, and is expected to increase to 28.5 million by 2020. VMT is increasing faster than either population or employment. PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 3 1 9 9 DailyPerson Trips -The average daily 8 person trips in the thru Tucson metropolitan area was estimated to be approxi- 2 mately 579,000 in 1960. Travel demand has grown to 2 over 2.5 million trips per day in 1995, and is expected to a increase to 4.2 million by 2020. Summary - All of the demographic, economic, and geo- graphic forecasts for the Tucson metropolitan area indi- cate a substantial increase in travel demand over the next 20 years. One of the primary purposes of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan is to provide a vision of how the existing and future demands for transportation within the metropolitan area will be met. EXISTING SYSTEM AND TOTAL SYSTEM NEEDS THROUGH 2020 The assessment of existing transportation system needs Intense • was based on an extensive review of prior studies and ,:.,,,,,,:v.„.._......_t1Onat adw data describingexistingsystem conditions and deficiencies. ;t::fir:r:.�; ��{�•:Y ..�. � e�ard •ff.•::''r.; '.*: ����� {�}� �� f "'otA The aviation system needs presented in the t:r�;,^}.• }:•.4.;:{•:}}:•}�{;:,:r!}?ri wr.•iZt:!}�!fi•'r::'ntiv`r h:�,v,��v�vY.:r;'::: v,.... d�'i�/'(�' •/ fr�{�•,:.. r�!�J�}'1{'YjpY!��v:::4w,•v�'�'+r.}•:{�r'�•Y?�!Y.:�:•:::.v.�:y'�,�:4x;•. c0 r'�:• ••::�}�:•'r:•:;':: ::.,{:'.,v,.}7t':+'v:ti;:•'•mow:•;; .;',.5�:•_ ... '•Y V ■ • X.-•: • 'r::•:+:1::;f}�■•..:: .:}•• S..,• •:!K! ::r' •1,P"•'r l}', : A" ,• iiii:•,: Regional Aviation System Plan (RASP) �'St:�::•::{•{'v ti?{�{.'r::.::::�• f •.r •'•}•}\;;. 5` w::,•:;. r •'•. 'rti} ��•• v g riles:• '' ▪ : '• '" f'fir.....� .,h•v,:.::f r�tic}.K{�',}?r{}�f rr. r. ':rJO▪k+n. 'fir• ��� .y r 'r:•..::9y,�:!!}; �:,•,'..{'{.fys��::;:} .. :. -r::' ; :.' :::f ., w ::: •ti • included in this assessment. The , :.�'.� ;��':. �,:..;.;��:!.}.��.�.:�, '::,.. were not inc u >'' :.:. : :. •.:': •.},ti:::?i,r::i:.: .• :}f . • assessment of the existings stem needs •' �� ����� ▪ ' • :�'..�`�� •�. : • � �P. �'�•'¢•. ;^.rr{+�i :fr t<•' ••\Y!SCv?� ..i• ;Z . :'': v'} . ?':•:::':•. :i•. •' :x.:. Civ;': `.} :f: 'f the roadwa transit bic cle : ::��:��. -�:.�...:::.. �:. .�..:� ;� �r�. ::.•� focused onY , rN}}, edestrian and other needs for the metro oli•��J�� �.,r�.��'�•.,•y�'�•''�•'•:,:.;., •{r� 1IY•r.h�`••,•� ♦ •' .'{N ,. :;};�:;. :.:7k tirF{'rr`.v,.;:?:}�.':''{•}•titi{ :•r,:};;} v�b>,•�;,:^?}4J; '. :::}9;;�,•':.: �� :': }�. • • '.t•.'''''''''' ''''''''..m:'.::.::':':'....:."''': ';'1,C'''''''.}Y.♦? ?v r :.. :{.;{�i. }i'r:•,•: :v:' {•::•::•::':•w'-•''.'? . �: : �.?:!' :f f _ :::: ::: ::::::.. � tan area including the operation and mainte :-:S,•: '!••:}•: q: yr:'.ftiv ':'rti::':•:'. :�?t•}•:::::.1� ^ •♦a. V p \:.{ ti., i:•:.�:�'• ,7''.•,:nti{•. 't'••.rid{:{••:•: r r :, t.o.m. :h •]�M1.. .r. v. �.•:'' ��Y L,:- Hance of the system. The costs required to { ':h'!•y,Y'•\Yr} ':••.''fir.r'!':`'• �• •::'::•:: '''•.hMN` � '�.'' `.::{.{.},.• �':��' :.; .: K' { brin the existings stem upto a desirable level �,�''•�•{. {rte' :.�.:f{{ .r. r•{: :♦: •..{: , •{.•.,{•}•T:''y(.fir.• •'+{ '}{r, •ti,'. k•r.•Vii::'{,''t <}{, �YJ;i, : .r. :`.',,rti • f o eration includingoperation and mainte- .. :_•r.:.Sr„q�:'?'ti.. -y},•��'•�, .3�,ti.r:.• r r�SC• •• :::f�.^:�rrr..... } nance through the year 2020, were estimated to ?;,,r �' .: ., tir. r{::• .,,�• '::. �•: ��':.. ::�::.. be $4.3 billion. �:•:•"`;?Y : -0 iC�?': x::'ti':'�'''•~':tip•▪ 'ti'{r r: ;: •.•.•:• {--- ..:'... ..�::::��h.}..:�:.: �: .. �:� .::._. ••:� •:��:� A similar assessment was conducted to determine ��7C ' . ':'>::t!•:' '.: : thetotal transportation s stem needs for the year ��,j,�.¢{:nti': .:iv!{.�•: ::{ :} �� {;;•::::•}:'�::}'r}:hti•:•:;.� .rr�}fir�v�r..,:i Y :ti:i.:: Y, .} -.:wit...._'- •:... .,}:��',. theexistingsystem > : :� }: {ti.::: 2020. The total needs include . .. : ./.., .,..: ::.}:,. .:. -,... :::::::;:::,:::'.:::::%t.rti. ne dsplus the additional needs resultingfrom the .� ;i/`r�d'•j':: "d:.}gK:r:•i;i::::•v!�":'•�: ?:� e p :'�:: P A METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OVERVIEW G The MTP describes the planned transportation system M improvements anticipated for the period 1998 through T 2020 to provide for the efficient movement of people and p goods. The MTP is a multimodal transportation plan which includes improvements to roadway, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, intermodal, and aviation facilities. The MTP includes a Financial Plan that identifies existing and new fundingsources to support the Plan, andX • provides an estimate ofthe anticipat- : L -- . : ; :. ... r :t ed revenues available from the exist- � � :i � ` :;: . ' {: r .{ gM1 ' :' :. ingand newre enuesources. Thett :YtA �� � . T.:..: Financial PIancontcontains Actiony ( :r:}: ,• t I4: :�: Planescri ingthesteps necessary0116:11111: ''..'1111:::::..:::4i•;:4•11.6.:.: 1111 iiiiigiOniii:VIftOut the new fundingsources in y � .�, .: :. : igiNieo.iit#516. p lac :.:: :.:i ::'0"*.:.:.:.. ...A. rtiJ % rti..zlii!iiim::11,:ki::.*:.... . r: :} ilI The f Io ingsecoonspovideabriefY : tiY� r Y Ygati r summary000 of thetransportation system : r improvements, costs, and the Financial 06:10111A:iiiiii:'?•":, • i�•i : A arr :ti : :ii: ... . . Plan contained in the MTP. The com- {!. f :�.::f cie Mile interchange,{: ; .;. :'•::.: 10/Mira plete MTP document and - 'r -.: "ew interstate other support- �� }' ing materials can be obtained from PAG. Roadway Improvements The MTP includes over $1.9 billion in regional roadway capacity improvements and nearly $1.4 billion in other non-capacity improvements. The capacity and non- capacity improvements are illustrated graphically in Exhibits 2 and 3, respectively. The roadway capacity improvements are a major compo- nent of the overall transportation plan to help address existing and forecast travel needs within the region. These roadway capacity improvements will increase the availability of roadway facilities through the construction of new roadways, widening existing roadways by adding new traffic lanes, building new interstate traffic interchanges and grade separated intersections, and reconstructing existing intersections to add capacity. Non-capacity roadway improvements include reconstruc- tion of existing roadways to replace the existing pavement structure, adding raised landscaped medians, improving intersection geometrics, drainage improvements, bridge- PAC Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 5 9 9 rehabilitation, and addingpedestrian and bicycle facilities. lhru Intelligent transportation system (ITS) improvements 2 include implementation of a Freeway Management System z (FMS) on Interstate 10 to monitor and help o reduce congestion through the use of closed-circuit video, vehicle detection loops, ramp metering, and other tech- nologies. Other ITS improvements in the region include construction of congestion monitoring/mitigation and acci- N . r. : �� ¢:Y>4�;fay>>• .:�.� Y,r dent detection systems on major streets, and J. •• •,� •<. .. w�'ti ti. ` '' •••{• 'r•._ expansion of the traffic signal coordinationsys- tem s-tem to include more intersections. Theo era- tion and maintenance of the existing transporta- tion roadwaysystem m is also a significant ele- ����� >•:'• went of the non-capacity improvements, accounting for approximately 70 percentf the o .Y: costs for this category. Thono:Tad:aiTra�sit C.en.t.e.r • • . .. . • .:'... Exhibit 4provides a summaryof the major capac- ity ac - . . it andnon-capacityimprovements. Transit Improvements The MTP contains over $1.4 billion in transit system improvements. Major transit improvements are planned for the regional Sun Tran fixed route bus system. Local transit circulators will provide service within the Towns of Marana, Oro Valley, and Sahuarita and within the Green Valley area. Paratransit services will be provided by the City of Tucson, Pima County Rural Transit, and by the local transit circulators. The local transit circulators, Pima County Rural Transit service, the City of Tucson paratran- sit service, and the Sun Tran service will be interconnect- ed to provide complete regional transit service. The existing Sun Tran bus fleet will more than double in size from 200 to 415 buses operating on an expanded local and express bus route system. Approximately 360 route-miles of service are planned to be added to the existing Sun Tran system, bringing the total route-miles of service to 1,300. The frequency of Sun Tran bus service will be increased to provide better service, and service hours will be extended at night and on weekends. New park-and-ride lots, transit centers, and other transit facili- ties will be added to the Sun Tran system. Improvements to the Sun Tran system will also include ITS technologies to enhance transit system management and performance. Page G - -- --- p - To Is A Picacho �D :1 MAINSAIL G Peak M ‘ g ., i 1 ---. o f, , Exhibit 2 T MARANA 1 Z P mooRNEkiN MOORE It 011" N_______ \ PALISADES Roadway Capacity 111 toR0 Improvements �``�"�' r-----*, 4`N N '� mgVALLEY By Year 2020 , ,... „--- .... i,� LN noir ,42,-- EN "s" t-----'44, \ Tal � HARDY rt1ui MU6EE • VII, o. r... tit AK_ t 1 ! i 1111111 4,,,, A / AM SN DER Ro. GUANO DEL• • • SW Ilk WETMORE Fri g `1 i111■IJ leIC. vi1P411 1 FL L10WFi1 TANQLE VERDE ;ri��r�i i +.� • T CS sl\I ME 611.V61H St ii !L°d . � '441111.011011.916,11111, 1111 22ND 1 s spyLj, UN sT :•TUCSON o./ ! coLF Lilacs Nt, 44' 1' 4. .--"'"' -----'-BOPP Nmuipold w°Ili . ,L. EMIL t liiiS 46' 6 a • IRVINGICIN sh.i.iiii ii . g W ..._ 10.1D4C14 •. S 1111111 44 ' •• REAMS .. OLD VAIL CONN. :I% 4 V• COLOSSALpod:40 CAW Ne 19 DOWNTOWN TUCSON 1 PIMA MINE RD 1.,,,. k ,i, '0,,, , .,. :, 4 ,. • ,,,, SAWARITA .• 0,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„,.i►l♦. Q ig :. "''1,_ IF ♦ ,,,�„ SA ; A-ITA I CUSFpNG b 3 Existing Facilities New or Reconstructed 0 INTERCHANGESINTERCHANGESo GRADE SEPARATED GRADE SEPARATED 18TH ST . INTERSECTIONS vl INTERSECTIONS . Source:PAGTPD ROADWAYS Note: GREEN pia New Total Through Lanes Some of the roadway projects Identified VALLEY ;7 I •••onme2 LT'.,. 6 on this rnap increase capacity through CANOA RD.•'4 s un. ,.: 3 8 the provision of new continuous center ..... 4 6+2 left-turn lanes or new raised medians .p. with left-turn bays. . -,tb . NOT TO SCALE - --- __ PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 7 9 9 8 ihru 2 0 2 0 Page 8(this page left blank) P A G fiD i Exhibit 3 1T MARANA p. • -- 5 1 PAG MTP P MARANA gi § L i 2_ 1 6) Other Non-Capacity ....., --, Roadway Improvements ,..., L. -)fil 1 /7 "wiiiitaimr. ORO //VALLEY By Year 2020 \._ - t\UA ,-- WAMERT ---- 7 . ... O.CONDOM NAR DY w,-To Summerhaven 1 1 /I i 1741, g ) 1 - ---1 § _ -------- . ' z /1 •. --- /\---ele DOWNTOWN TUCSON • cutto pa 034R0 •IL mil .., — / , •-g , \`17/ \ \• tc-)4{.•-,, AM St -- ‘11111.171E1 i , i ,/ , so •!._, 11I r"a IDW13.1 / 1 i ' i 1 FT.LOWELL ''' t\ _..1.\ --N '1 fill 111 . •,_ , ----7ON° SPEEDWAY 1,1 „111111111•1110111111111111 lino Shil6TH ST. ... GONGR;S ''•, ' "cS)-- - t il Wilt Xi 1.11.!In. IIIIIIIIII! CNG Itzgart •\1 w -GO ------ . 11- 4 op . . OW Et . . - .T.st sLvE 1d,k,..•11 it" UCSO • i 1611Vlioe .., -, -------i 11110i1,,.. • i ' 1 L ....__., I Ea, BROADYSW 22ND ESCALAME IRv4.)GiON - •'--- , _ ___ 8 , — , ._...- - . 1013111 , , SIA11411. . Ck0 ,ALB,DA is 1 ix _, -A.. 7 .____• LOS REALES / . N *.- / OLD VAR COM \ cillIMMNUMMIT ST 0 / • /ODLOgRACdkie RF3 / // ‘DS --1- SOUTH TUCSON AND L ..RD • SURROUNDING AREA f - •MARSit MON,ROAD ( \ \ g C._...._.4 # w 11 16ti: • ilfSA el :ZITA z' Existing Facilities 8 1 1 I 29" S' • * INTERCHANGES o GRADE SEPARATED ROADWAYS ' • INTERSECTIONS -•,. . / S 4e, ' .-- g - Other Roadway Improvements Roadway Reconstruction/Rehabilitation AJO WAY '''' ti i ,s a.. 2 lanes to 2 i011€6 ', i-1 0 Freeway i 1 w -- _ . ..........m 4 lanes to 4 lanes Management System GREEN IRvIYGTON WE) VALLEY /17 , -. 4 tales to 3 lanes Recommended RS CANQA RD•cff.3. Ord:loge Routes Source: PAGTPD i Safely d New/Reconstiucted Ridges 6e40--- 'it.. NOT TO SCALE --- - PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 9 1 9 9 8 Ihru 2 0 2 0 Page 10(this page left blank) P A The Old Pueblo Historic Trolley is planned to be extended G into the downtown area through a new 4th Avenue under- M pass of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, currently under T design. The trolley will then be routed through the down- p town to the Tucson Convention Center. The planned transit system improvements are illustrated graphically in Exhibits 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Exhibit 4 Roadway Improvements Summary Table Capacity Improvements Total Interstate Widening 49.4 lane-miles Reconstructed Interstate Traffic Interchanges 8 New Interstate Traffic Interchanges 2 New Frontage Roads 22 lanes-miles Reconstructed Frontage Road 18 lane-miles New or Widened Arterial/Collector Roadways 473 lane-miles (including 8 lane-miles of new bus lanes) Reconstructed Arterial/Collector Roadways 172 lane-miles New Grade Separated Intersections (GSIs) 5 Reconstructed Grade Separated Intersections (GSIs) 1 Major Intersection Reconstructions 40 Cost (roadway capacity improvements) $ 1.9 billion Cost (roadway non-capacity improvements) $ 1.4 billion TOTAL COST OF ALL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS $ 3.3 billion Travel Demand Management Programs The MTP includes $51 million for continuation and expan- sion of several travel demand management programs intended to help reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality. These programs include the Travel Reduction Program to promote alternate mode use, the Rideshare Program to promote and coordinate ridesharing, the Sun Tran Transit Pass Program to provide transit passes at reduced rates, the City of Tucson Alternate Modes Program to promote the use of alternate modes, the Pima County Clean Air Program to provide educational and technical service to reduce travel by and emissions from automobiles. PAC Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 11 9 9 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements thru The MTP provides $137 million and $129 million for bicy- 2 cle and pedestrian facilities, respectively, in addition to o those facilities provided in conjunction with roadway sys- 2 o tern improvements and included as part of those costs. It is important to note that the City of Tucson, the Town of Oro Valley, and Pima County have policies in place to pro- vide bicycle lanes or paved shoulders and pedestrian facilities as part of major roadway construction or recon- struction projects. Other PAG jurisdictions also have sim- ilar supportive bicycling polices and will construct these facilities when feasible. It is anticipated that the majority of the arterial and collector roadway improvement proj- ects in the Plan will include these facilities. .:•.,,,,,,:,:,:,:::: :::;:,:::,:::::::,:,;,iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Based on funding bicycle for bic cle and •1:.{ pedestrian de s t r ian facilities c il h ies contained t a fi ned in the Plan, n , : :::;: • : :•::-:. .:'i•,::::::: nig:{ tipapproximately s of bicycle faciliieS :• . NB::' �LY : :: : : (lanes,• andaths , and about 740 .\. f: miles of sidewalks c an be constructed .:--- ,...,.. -,, . r � r:. over thelan period. These estimates ates . .: f : ' include bicycle and pedestrian facilities ::,> . constructed as part of major roadway ' •-: %-x-91 '.:4) *:. ti —.. .:: projects. .: ;v ..�i�< '}: �•::•: • ?QMH.;}.-•:.•!. 'f •t .�y�,,}•�,NY:::+:;.• ;Vii;:�L;L. 'S:•�}:�V .ii,':***' r.Y • ' : :} t• • -, . 1,::.....- ::::f�r} : : 0: iL:rrr:�;CI. : Other f h e r P r oJ e c ts /P r o r a m s :::::3::::::: YLrr:� Lti }:: TeI Planprovidesforoh r types p e s of r o 1 : :Y fftiY Y.. : r• � yL•{:; :r: f::} :::::::: :: : cts and programs which include items s : ` Y} � Yrsuchas advancedright-of-wayaCauS ♦r{ ti . ■ •rv ,YY . � :ift, tion formultimodaItransporttion pro . :YA. Xg ects,tsuse0f improvementdistricts with ilailliell.!1:111111.1.i:L.10:it.Ii:t.: :Yx�:�:{� additoI jurisdictionaI fundinmatch,} rk� r: es, mapping, and lipiiiillifiRtatiliCIIIMIX:V.4...it.':7.:.!;i4t21 mode l' n9 projects, and ::;m..::.::::::.iiiiiiiiiiiliniiiiii!....,:1/ � Y� increased f f ndin m mi commitments for : rC• \• : tifftransportation • ����..... ��YY . � : : : : s .�� t ra s p o rtato pr og a m m in g r a fi re } ::ti, � >. t. � A : ���:: . �� �� me is These pro1ectsnd pr o .. ::: :.:6:•ax:. grams are estimated to cost approxi mate)y $69 million.Muntain Avenue pedestrian and bicycle facilities, 1998 Other costs include transportation system administration and planning for the operation and maintenance (O&M) of the transportation system. These costs are estimated to be approximately $496 million. Page 12 • --- P A G 10 I: M 77 t . 1 • -------______ t gP MARANA ) gli ' ,-'s MOORE MOORE \ ,_ Exhibit 5 PAG MTP N.,,, • TAt4GERINE Sun Tran Local Fixed Route muSADES NAN 4JA DR — ../ 6.' AA.wilt TI---'• .,/ ,0-.41,.--->,--ie Frequency of Service VA LEY By Year 2020 N . .. ..__.- LEM WSTA VW PEND RD . . CALLE CONCorm , CNERION \ HARDY fr,_,, (FARMS RD. S NA 7 7 •l1\ ._ ,,e. rzi.. . 1 i It 11 --,_ 0 Ili! / SOUTH TUCSON AND . ., SURROUNDING AREA ,, , • SUER ROAD r. .' MIND DEI clitN0 ' i'l i __ 1. ' ll 7- ,--• - T ll ..,st WEIMORE .. _ _i • -;I i am // RNER RD it ",,,,, - 1 ' 22nd Si •......• • t I 1 11 • 11 , , ,.,. TANnis vEstc. Y _....___------- II Nom mom . SPEEDwAY__ ...- --,-- ------ • .1-...Aci.ISOM IIIIIII111111111111r/IIE . ' A 5TW61H ST • 3611 St N.,, 'rip.I'm .§' A 11111 MINIM; MIMI A.A111., NOWNAY ---. '-'; '-'' 1 ..''''- i -' 11 , 'U( . i — 22ND ST fl N \. . ra ' ,1 OyTH. , 1 .' ! --. ;-.- i I\ 1 2911 ST N•-•,-—-- GOLF UNKS ,,, a6N a SWERtAKE' .,fUCSO N'I- -,,,, • ' ' 110 liAt '',.N. 'tii4-t_. 1 tr..- .• : - 1 il , " • , , 4,, ___ BOPP :),c4„ Igi leg 1 - ' i i..,„,,,,,,j/Lit IRMNGTON 1 ,-'›-- I 11 .., li ! frzy :. iv- ini 411"7,71.,,:,, .. * lat IRMIGICN ..<_-- II ' / ,. - vAliNcta .1 ' 1 ) 1 .. • - g Los REALES — \\. --... \ \ @:'?) 7 ,/ ..,AL CONN. — . \ .,) , A , , / /, . - COLOSSALJ CAVE RD DOWNTOWN 11JCSON / PiNtA MINE RD(I) • , / . liP •_,\. , 0 _ .............„ _, • ....,. , , 4 SA it,,RITA T.= . Comenice 1 8 3 I. , CUSHING I4P. Peak Hour Interchanges latilsT ( ex g • Frequency of Service <> I • li ''' g 1 1.11.111111.1. 10 Minute SOURCE: City of Tucson DOT Existing Transit Centers........... 15 minute ------- • GREEN ---- ' ......... 30 Minute * VALLEY acif Park&Ride Lots Proposed Transit Facilities GANDA RD. .3. NOTE: Only highest frequency of service • 0 Bdsting Lots shown on roadway segments with multiple 1 A Proposed Lots bus routes. $46, — , eir NOT TO SCALE -------PAC Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 13 9 9 8 ttwo 2 0 2 0 Page 14(this page left blank) A V G "Lori_ z s Exhibit 6 T MARANA 1 g i PAG ITP P *g MOORE home III IIISun Tran Express N_______ - A; ,,, ZANGERIVE D� Peak Hour Bus Trips .v. li‘ „Ai aPilli ByYear 2020 .� W VA ,AaUNDA VISTA s.. PRO RD'-- ,4, T CAM CONCORDIA HARDY • CORTARO ' WA4iGEE - FARfVB RQ .1 N' .111 1 i i mg § q�,,,_ �,,,,_ ♦ N INA b SOUTH TUCSON ANDr AMR& SURROUNDING AREA s SOLD fo CAMPlO DEL CERRO It..1 v ■ 164t SO WETMORE ,� N+ •( 911111' IllikRSR ,. Pi LO ELL22nd Sf I �.- ''"" --.-�TI.SLRBSNJR: 29@s A I�u l WI SPEEDYAY lielit In=O_ 1111111111011111IIIIIIIIIMIIPMVAI ` f II 1' Ill Nil}{I61Fisf =WI ION ' BROADWAY • • .111160.41111 UCSON � PASS Ei "�,:: i■ liel 29TH STNM MO WAY TM rigfa...wilot, r 1 1 A■ ° A W W --' MPP ESCAIANTE ' ', 1 0131111161111, II NuvuJGTorJ ' 1 ‘44 B d'. dAIENC A 7 reli PANGTON i �,,.. . g uos R6AlE6 P ♦ 0 OLD VAIL CORAL. Illh A Cil • COWSSAL CAVE RD DOWNTOWN TUCSON IP 19 PIMA PANE RD - • ATHSi. ,,sat, 0,14„, ,,;,,, 2 .tiikAtilliLs* . iu .SEE ..,, i. SA A ITA W.,. 1 .7 8 I CUSHING t 3 • a' g Number of Interchanges 1SALT ---- Ce. g Peak Hour Trips 40 g 2 TriPs Existing Transit Centers SOURCE: City of Tucson DOT 4 Trips * GREEN Pa �, -. b Proposed Transit Facilities VALLEY Park&Ride Lots # CANOA as' s 3 r2 Bitting Lots A Proposed Late °NT,ti, 9 NOT TO SCALE PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 15 1 9 9 8 Ihru 2 0 2 0 Page 16(this page left blank) P A 0 G M i MARANA Z Exhibit 7 8IIP MOORE MOORE .1, 11,,, PAG MTP TANGERDE PALISADES 0 Sun Tran soca/Fixed Route il ..111 AVM, o-,» Service Expansion N vA ByYear202 • UNaA Vara THIN PEMS RD .,, N cauF ooNcoRDw HARDY1 i CORWtO �^AtinCEE h11 RD. rri `I.'. , ill f---;\ 1 1 z 4,, SOUTH TUCSON AND i SURROUNDING AREA 1 ri. LL dIg ,Raw 14 / g i 1 10 116. 1; V WETMORE ,.., VIP ACII��� 4 Rn V 111.I I 1 Eli ill NUE . I• II 1 III FT.LOWEll INN& iii i I Id:il 2..1 MINI IL__...... I moo iii Ili i:=rah .am. iPEH7NAY ,1. earn i ,1 Al ""L=-:■IIIIIII■■■■lid MI6 A eaaowa A;15 i7'ii II II Will THST At PASS ® --,mac !�m.0,0) a ti .e g 22ND ST TrH sr 36TH ST `"' ' ��Jr".r 011111111111 GOLF LINKS tili ' , .a ti wr °M ,®rAi1:11191 _, S._ MANI E9CMANIE 11111111p . r f IFMNGTON ll 16 I If71►� nit tk IV ` . hIL'- IIIi►�..� 6 VALENCIA 45,4 sale tO 0 OW VNl CONN. i. `V �. -416 COLOSSAL CAVE QE 19 DOWNTOWN TUCSON ;� �R .. iiiii tr,:.:. .„..1. 44.",.„„.., 11\ ......iiiiolioax , . ,,,,_ &MUMMA •41,4 - lay... -- • Y A ITA 1 I CUSI4tNG • d .. ISA .� ieTH si . S �ll Bus Routes Interchanges Network SOURCE: City of Tucson DOT .s....�.... Se ceS F� ons GREEN PfiiExisting Transit Centers VALLEY IPari&Rid®Lots * C'"°°RD. ° 's A ProPosed Lots Proposed Transit Facilities 47itio e • NOT TO SCALE PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 17 9 9 8 thru 2 0 2 0 Page 18(this page left blank) P A G IV M covE 1..,, T m Exhibit 8 � � � o MARANA o N PAG MTP P MOORE g Sun Tran Express N________ . ' Ms service Expansion I '/ .vuo r By Year 2020 N .�i/ ''• _ L„ •r UPM A4SfA PWT,PEND,a) calf coNcofmb+ 1 -HARDY 1 k illL FARMS RD. Roo. Ihiammoniiiiir,.`_ I. 44„.. /---\t, 40 SOUTH TUCSON AND jj' SURROUNDING AREA ;. _ Al- •- ROAD Ti :: CAMof<.-. 10 �� • W � 1,.� ,. � ,•■�• ri i 1 ■I■I ■IMI II .,..., ..., , , FT.LOWELL tion 1 iiiiiiilll ; u _.___,A.Li ;.•,.;,El I 1111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPMIC �dAY (MOTH BT .. t,� AliP111111N3BROADWAY/rot '. . ' i iii / rlIVIIIIIIII: .../1111iiiptirell11L. IVIT2166, 29TH ST GOLF LING III APO WAY r ,e ?::... W i A. ® ESCALANIE MOPP' �.iMalg,MM. 6 IIIEl i. 7 ,: it. IIIVINGTCN VALENCIA ariipiti 1 04,4._ LOS REALES 141 0 OLD VAL CONN. + COLOSSAL GAVE RD (df DOWNTOWN TUCSON % PAWL MINE RD 6114 XI 4 VP Illi opsoll l'OtNt „Z" SANUARITA M ‘0111110litilialk 0 SA AzZITA i ykr.nr, ow w i, g 16TH sr d''''' g * Bus Routes Interchanges g -- Bdsfing Network G SOURCE: City&Tucson DOT Service ,j Existing Transit Centers GREEN S Park&Ride Lots VALLEY 4!f i� Et.at's CANOA�` s Proposed Lots Proposed Transit Facilities NOT TO SCALE PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 19 1 - 9 9 8 lhru 2 0 2 0 Page 20(this page left blank) _ __________ _____ _____ _._ ______ -— P A Saddlebrooke G Exhibit 9 M 1--- ,,o,.„,,,,,, ,-, i 1 Catalina PAG MTP mac T ----maw 't ----- _ B if,' 5 5 , Service Area P Marano—----- ?,..- ,z Paratransit, Piounty ; Rural Transit' _ 4,,„ Communliyi ---) g ' -g, -f '_,77 Circuicrtor Local Circulator, maranc. - --, wpx,,,c and Paratranstt -- Serviarea MORANA — ' service Area TANGER.E/ ' and Rural Transit Service „, — . . PAUSADES 6' Ner I 0 111111 1 By Year 2020 Picture R'r. — U`i VA LEY Town of Oro Valley Circ . . To ' "6--`4*' Community Circulator %WI PEAKS R6- 41/4s% ,, .:.,4 ''1 ' -and Paratranstt (.;,,-)-7SummethaverV ,,,,-." Mt.Lemmon Picture Rocks • : Service Area Mt.Lemmon ,,- Ski Lodge 1 .,Service Area 1 °"Riio, was 6i. Mk • ''' MIMI Shuttle Service Area -,...,, _. Pfeil*, \ i 1 kb:A, r.- ----.I N •.. - $ ,- 2 ;12:' cii 1 J WADER ROAD CASMO DEL caw \\ _ '' II, ,/" ), y 1 / WEE ...,....,- 1 ; II \-- \--R.,R. r// FT. ONELL 1 1 , --- N ' .I I I 1 I il• LOWELL '- -410-.LC VERD- ,.__---------j - - Wi Ogle Ili ! -i - - 111111Mij 0.1 --- '— 51W6TH ST 101111_ __ IU NOWAY *--- -G'14°4' .ii.4'411411111 ' - MS 2'21,ID ST ,7. • E .4r 2,7R4 ST,..t. NN 43,043. -L:..• I it 36TI I 1 Service . .,....- -,,... 1 , ESCALANTE IWINGTON a - .. it_ • ck,„ i _ Nt ,_____ te6 RENO NO to Tucson , Intercity Servic,,,i,--,4Plma Coiinty . i--\-- Rural yanstt s,._._„, ,1,345) San Xavier \ r )) CU)VAJI.CONN. Service Area - To No _ 4 , COL-L-6;;17CAVE RO 7 - I_ -- DOWNTOWN TUCSON Shutti 0-to Tucson Int. • anal Airport • PM NNE RD d., V '-.--,,,„ r OLVD and U anHTransit Centers • „Ai, _APIs, Mille Town• Sahuaitta/Green Valey 1 i \ corn ,unity Circulator an(*----841("CTA Parair,6 net( Service Area — 0 -.. i .,, .LJ ,., 1....e...7.— SA kRITA 1 , ) .,. c st • Interchanges 3 1 1871.1MH'ST G u -t 0 \ i ExistingTransit * ___ GREEN ' il nsrciftnsCiteFnacterslittles Source: FAG Member JurisdictionsExisting ad Pueblo Trolley Tracks Alignment EllaMeargl VALLEY i CANOA RD, z Proposed Routing Area for Trolley Tracks Extension NOTE: Sahuarita/Green Valley service area Includes Green Valley demand responsive service and ,p. Van Tran Paratranstt Service Area Sahuarlta/Green Valley community circulator service, 4038,, f - NOT TO SCALE -PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 21 9 9 8 thru 2 0 2 0 Page 22(this p L=e left blanc) P A Total Transit and Other Alternate Mode G Improvement Costs M The total cost for operation, maintenance, and improve- T ment of the transit, bicycle, pedestrian, travel demand p management, and other alternate mode projects is esti- mated to be $2.3 billion over the plan period. A summary of these costs is provided in Exhibit 10 Exhibit 10 Cost of Transit and Other Improvements by Project Type Cost in Millions of 1998 $ Project Type (incl. 0 & M thru 2020) Transit Service: Sun Tran Fixed Route 1,191 Van Tran Paratransit 157 Pima County Rural Transit 30 Pima County Handl Car 23 Local Bus Circulators 16 Travel Demand Management (TDM) 51 Bicycle Improvements 137 Pedestrian Improvements 129 Other 69 Other O & M 496 Total $ 2,299 Total MTP Cost The estimated total cost of the MTP is $5.6 billion (exclud- ing rail and aviation). Exhibit 11 provides a summary of these costs by cost category. Regional Aviation System Plan (RASP) PAG updated the RASP in 1995. The RASP update is incorporated into the MTP and is available from PAG as a separate document. The RASP update identified, quanti- fied, and prioritized aviation-related development needs through 2020. The cost of the improvements needs iden- tified in the RASP have not been included in the cost estimate of the MTP provided above because these improvements are funded by sources that are separate and distinct from those sources used to fund the roadway, transit, and other improvements included in the MTP. PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 23 1 9 9 8 Financial Plan thru To meet Federal requirements, the Plan must be finan- 2 cially feasible. That is, the cost of the transportation sys- ° tem elements of the Plan must be consistent ent with the rev - 2 enues that can reasonably be expected to be available to fund the Plan. The Financial Plan element of the MTP provides an Action Plan describing the steps necessary to put the required new funding sources in place. Existing revenue sources are estimated to generate $3.9 billion through year 2020. Existing revenue sources include the current taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel ($0.18 per gallon state gasoline tax, $0.184 per gallon Federal gasoline tax, and $0.224 per gallon Federal tax on diesel fuel), the lottery revenues that are used for transportation, development impact fees, the State vehi- cle license tax, and transit farebox revenues. Exhibit 11 MTP Cost Summary Cost in Millions of 1998 $ Cost Category (incl. 0 & M thru 2020) Roadway Capacity Improvements 1 ,935 Other Roadway Improvements 1,367 Transit Service 1,417 Travel Demand Management 51 Bicycle Improvements 137 Pedestrian Improvements 129 Other (1) 565 Total $ 5,601 Existing System 0 & M 2,242 New Capital Facilities 2,571 Operations and Maintenance of New Capital 788 Total $5,601 (1) "Other" cost refers to categories including safety, drainage, , landscaping, and system planning and administration. Page 24 P A The revenues from existing sources are insufficient to pro- G vide for even the operation, maintenance, and improve- M ment of the existing system to meet today's needs. Without the provision of other new sources of revenue, p the provision of new transportation facilities to meet future needs would come at the expense of maintenance of the existing system or reductions in service. This was judged to be an unacceptable condition. Therefore, the Financial Plan element of the MTP contains an Action Plan for the implementation of new revenue sources to be used in addition to the funding anticipated from existing sources. The new revenue sources described in the MTP are the following: •A State gasoline tax adjusted for inflation that would eliminate the erosion of buying power for this revenue source by keeping pace with inflation. It is estimated that inflation would require an additional $843 million to maintain the current buying power of this revenue source. •The implementation of an inflation adjusted devel- opment impact fee on a regional basis (i.e., by each jurisdiction) at an initial rate of $2,500 per new dwelling unit. This would generate an addi- tional $293 million. •A countywide 1/4 cent general sales tax that would be dedicated for the provision of increased public transit service. This would provide an additional $562 million. The total revenue from the existing and new sources is estimated to be $5.6 billion through the year 2020. This would provide sufficient funds to support the costs of the MTP. However, this is only enough revenue to cover approximately 60 percent of the total estimated trans- portation system needs of the metropolitan area. Action Plan The MTP is the result of a cooperative effort among the public, elected officials, and transportation planners. This same level of cooperation must continue in order to suc- cessfully implement the Plan. PAC Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 25 1 9 9 8 The Action Plan defines how each of the new funding Ihru sources will be implemented and monitored. Our local 2 governments can already implement the regional devel- opment impact fee; no new state legislation is needed. 2 ° The 1/4-cent sales tax is also currently authorized and requires approval of the voters in the region. To adjust the current gas tax for inflation would require authorization by the State Legislature, and then approval by the voters. The County's "discretionary" sales tax, which requires unanimous approval by the County Board of Supervisors, is a possible contingency source for revenue if one of the other three sources is not implemented. The public will be involved in the implementation of the new revenue sources. The Action Plan establishes new procedures for monitoring revenues and expenditures. These will become part of the annual Transportation Improvement Program. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE While the population of the region is ••r anticipated to increase ase b approximately I Y the• year 2 2 travel 50 percent by0 0 is demand expressed d in terms of daily Y 00.!:!!"*7 ;aa.:' .�. rr vehicle-miles i letraveled i s expected to vs rr { , . .;.• r r ... increase by over 80 percent. With '•.fir ♦.t•.,'. .�j.�. �ti}{. r •: ? : 1. � understanding that the MTP can only • � ; fund 60 percent of the identified needs �'�tip' S�'. ti,: :•r.•:.:{:v{•• r ::;5 }r.• •.•r:Y {•: �::�:::-• for region, hould be expected �.. o the it should .:•. .. .. thattravel conditions within the metro- - s. p oli an area measuredin terms of timeandwill n titravel co es congestion, g :r. t rn rt - wrninfureastasoa r o se the future p tion systemstem improvements fail toke keep .... • 1997 pace with regional growth. Speedway Boulevardat Mountain Avenue, Daily trips by automobile are expected to increase by 65 percent, trips by transit are expected to increase by 54 percent, and trips by bicycle are expected to increase by 30 percent. Travel under congested roadway conditions is expected to increase significantly by the year 2020. This is a direct result of the anticipated 83 percent increase in daily vehicle-miles traveled from 1995 to 2020 with only an 18 percent increase in roadway lane-miles of capacity provided by the MTP. Page 26 P A Federal requirements dictate that the estimated carbon G monoxide (CO) emissions for the MTP not exceed the M estimate for the base year 1990 conditions. The region- T al CO emissions in 2020 total 428.7 tons per day and p remain below the 1990 base CO emissions of 444.8 tons per day. This indicates that the MTP satisfies the Federal air quality conformity requirements. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The MTP public involvement program (PIP) extended over two and a half years and was conducted in three phases. In Phase I (Fall 1995) the primary goal was to understand what the public perceived to be the important transporta- ' tion issues in the region, and to solicit ideas for address- ing those issues. In Phase II (Fall 1997 - early 1998) the public was asked to review and comment on three exam- ple plans for the region's transportation future. Each example plan included a different mix of transportation improvements based on different funding assumptions. In addition, Phase II sought public input on whether to increase funding levels for transportation, and how this increase could be accomplished. In Phase III (earlySpring 1998 ) the proposed MTP, whichjurisdictional w r out of and ,::;;:iplilliliii;iii.:illigliiiillUi.il!:::.11111Eli:.,.!i111111111111Iiil!i:,.!!,A::.:i,.•.;F:ii!i;i:',:,•:•:ii.,iiiiii!::::: ;::::•i: e g general public blic input on the three example .:*iiiiiiiilligtoNimillippiri.:!!!!!!"!::Rigi.g;i:jiiiiiiiiiiii.,i,..EF;!:..!.4ii.iIi..,.i.i:!-(.. plans, waspresented to the public for revieww and comment before beingsubmitted to the --•• -• � PAG Regional Council for consideration for :ji:11::::: ;:::::.:.;:;...7:!!iiiiitii:00":7:::,!i:":711:11:.i: - ...:: approval. .<' 1 .W.vr .r •::i.i,iiiiiiii':' -,:'•.• ..i.:•i:::.i..Ine:-.Riii:dt;':'.::.::!:n:::':?;`.'2,7:::::.:*:.2::::-::„.::::?,. ;. il!' !''..Each phase of the PIP included extensive t :1 :, : :::•••�•:::::• .ti t , �•} :•r. Y :� r • .. interagencycoordination and jurisdictional nal tM. •r. :,..:...:„:.:.-:.,,,.., .: .....i. involvement. The MTP reflects the public :tiyt � f i.rdife-::.::.:. ..i.!:.i!.ii,:: and agency inputut in terms of the trans- - r: • 4: f ii...iiiiiak.:,..i.:pkiii.;;,,,. ...:. .ii:.!.,.... portation system improvements,rovements levels ofIiiiiiii,„:::!q7i:::;::::::::; ::::-.ii.:,.!.::':::;,.....--:.f n ing fun ing sources and I v Isof � v _ ..::.!:.::::::.::::.!::. .fi spending between modes. More details r .{..ti ..::::::::i:...Iii .,i::::::.• on thespecific ecactivities of the PIP IP and 111":' Y ti1 iiii:,::,ri:::.;i:';::....:••::::,..::::m.q:;;.:...t::! .!iig..!:.:::i. r Re 'denis he/p idNifytransprta t io n p issues and conc#erns at aublic response are contained in the r MTP documnt and in supporting mate SfiN rials available through PAG : .: <: : MTP Public event PAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan-Page 27