Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1657) **AMENDED AGENDA (12/05/00, 4:30 P.M.) ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 6, 2000 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding 1996 Agreement between Vistoso Partners, et al & Town of Oro Valley 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding a lease of Town owned real property by Comcast Cable Company 3. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding Tucson Water Issues RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS — TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE — According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town Council as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 10/30/00, 11/13/00 B. Budget and Bond Committee Report to Council for Quarter Ended September 30, 2000 C. Parks & Recreation Monthly Status Report— November 2000 12/06/00 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2 D. Approval of request to extend terms of the Fire Advisory Board to May 16, 2001 E. Resolution No. (R)00-103 Approval of an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County for Street Naming and Addressing Services, 2000 F. 0V12-00-06 Approval of public art proposed for the Golder Ranch Fire Station, at Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7, Parcel I, located on Woodburne Avenue G. Award of Bid - Four-wheel drive compact utility tractor to Burris- White Machinery, Inc. in the amount of$26,088.30 H. Approval of recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board to sponsor the Cactus Speed Classic V (in-line skating marathon) in Oro Valley on November 4, 2001 2. TOWN COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF TOWN FINANCIAL AUDIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 3. PUBLIC HEARING- REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A SERIES 09 PERSON TRANSFER LIQUOR LICENSE FOR FRY'S FOOD & DRUG N #117 LOCATED AT 10450 N. LA CANADA DRIVE 4. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN UPDATE FOR THE FY 2000/2001 GREATER TUCSON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP (GTSPED) FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEGISLATIVE ISSUES AND REQUESTING THE TOWN'S SUPPORT OF THE GTSPED LEGISLATIVE PRIORITY ISSUES 5. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-104 APPROVAL OF A LEASE OF TOWN OWNED REAL PROPERTY BY COMCAST CABLE COMPANY 6. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-105 OV12-00-20A SETTING POLICY REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WITH SLOPES 25% AND GREATER WITHIN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) Explanation: This is a request by staff to clear up ambiguities in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) related to development within areas of 25% slope and greater 7. OV12-87-1 B FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT, LA RESERVE (WILDERNESS III), LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE EAST OF THE ORACLE ROAD/LA RESERVE DRIVE INTERSECTION Explanation: This request is asking for a reduction in front yard setbacks for Wilderness III from 30 feet to 20 feet 12/06/00 Agenda,Council Regular Session 3 8. DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY POLICY WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF TOWN FACILITIES FOR TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES 9. RESCHEDULING THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING FROM DECEMBER 20, 2000 TO DECEMBER 18, 2000 AND CANCELING THE JANUARY 3, 2001 TOWN COUNCIL MEETING 10, RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-106 DECLARING THOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS, ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE, ARTICLE 11-4, PARKING AND ARTICLE 11-6, COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, A PUBLIC RECORD 11. ** DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION RELATING TO THE POSSIBLE RELOCATION OF THE ORO VALLEY LIBRARY PROJECT FROM NARANJA/LA CANADA DRIVE TO THE COPPER CREEK RIDGE PARK LOCATION (SOUTH OF COPPER CREEK SCHOOL) AND/OR THE NARANJA TOWN SITE PROPERTY TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT CALL TO AUDIENCE— According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience" cannot be discussed by the Town Council, as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific g member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 11/22/00 REPOSTED: 12/05/00 4:30 PM 4:30 PM LH LH A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. — 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 229-4700. 12/06/00 Agenda,Council Regular Session 4 INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Memberspublic of the have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action bythe Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. Ify ou wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please a complete speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room p p item give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during p "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council g once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. �. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 6, 2000 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding 1996 Agreement between Vistoso Partners, et al & Town of Oro Valley 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding a lease of Town owned real property by Comcast Cable Company 3. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding Tucson Water Issues RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS —TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE — According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience" cannot be discussed by the Town Council as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 10/30/00, 11/13/00 B. Budget and Bond Committee Report to Council for Quarter Ended September 30, 2000 C. Parks & Recreation Monthly Status Report— November 2000 12/06/00 Agenda,Council Regular Session 2 D. Approval of request to extend terms of the Fire Advisory Board to May 16, 2001 E. Resolution No. (R)00-103 Approval of an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County for Street Naming and Addressing Services, 2000 F. OV12-00-06 Approval of public art proposed for the Golder Ranch Fire Station, at Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7, Parcel I, located on Woodburne Avenue G. Award of Bid - Four-wheel drive compact utility tractor to Burris- White Machinery, Inc. in the amount of$26,088.30 H. Approval of recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board to sponsor the Cactus Speed Classic V (in-line skating marathon) in Oro Valley on November 4, 2001 2, TOWN COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF TOWN FINANCIAL AUDIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 3, PUBLIC HEARING- REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A SERIES 09 PERSON TRANSFER LIQUOR LICENSE FOR FRY'S FOOD & DRUG #117 LOCATED AT 10450 N. LA CANADA DRIVE 4. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN UPDATE FOR THE FY 2000/2001 GREATER TUCSON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP (GTSPED) FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEGISLATIVE ISSUES AND REQUESTING THE TOWN'S SUPPORT OF THE GTSPED LEGISLATIVE PRIORITY ISSUES 5. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-104 APPROVAL OF A LEASE OF TOWN OWNED REAL PROPERTY BY COMCAST CABLE COMPANY 6. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-105 OV12-00-20A SETTING POLICY REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WITH SLOPES 25% AND GREATER WITHIN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) Explanation: This is a request by staff to clear up ambiguities in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) related to development within areas of 25% slope and greater 7. OV12-87-1 B FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT, LA RESERVE (WILDERNESS III), LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE EAST OF THE ORACLE ROAD/LA RESERVE DRIVE INTERSECTION Explanation: This request is asking for a reduction in front yard setbacks for Wilderness III from 30 feet to 20 feet 12/06/00 Agenda,Council Regular Session 3 8. DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY POLICY WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF TOWN FACILITIES FOR TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES 9. RESCHEDULING THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING FROM DECEMBER 20, 2000 TO DECEMBER 18, 2000 AND CANCELING THE JANUARY 3, 2001 TOWN COUNCIL MEETING 10. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-106 DECLARING THOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS, ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE, ARTICLE 11-4, PARKING AND ARTICLE 11-6, COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, A PUBLIC RECORD TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT CALL TO AUDIENCE- According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council mayonly discuss matters listed on the Town Council Ag brought Matters brow ht up by the public under "Call to Audience" cannot be discussed bythe Town Council, as they have not been placed on the . . agenda. Anyitems must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 11/22/00 4:30 PM LH Agacket of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at p least 24 hoursp rior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. - 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 229-4700. 12/06/00 Agenda,Council Regular Session 4 INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. IfY ou wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room p and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. A 0 A, MINUTES 4.Y OF THE JOINT MEETING/STUDY SESSION OF THE 4-1/4, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, TOWN OF MARANA, CITY OF TUCSON, TOWN °` OF SAHUARITA AND PIMA COUNTY October 30, 2000 Sheraton El Conquistador Resort 10,000 N. Oracle Road Oro Valley,Arizona The Joint Session was called to order by Oro Valley Mayor Paul Loomis at 6:55 p.m. at the Sheraton El Conquistador Resort, Presidio Ballrooms 3, 4, & 5, 10,000 N. Oracle Road, Oro Valley, Arizona. Town of Oro Valley Elected Officials Town of Oro Valley Staff Paul Loomis,Mayor Chuck Sweet, Town Manager Francis LaSala,Vice Mayor Dan Dudley, Town Attorney Dick Johnson,Council Member Bill Jansen,Town Engineer Bart Rochman,Council Member Danny Sharp,Chief of Police Werner Wolff, Council Member Kathryn Cuvelier,Town Clerk Rachael Bartels,Assistant to Town Manager Sue King,Public Relations Specialist Town of Marana Elected Officials(No quorum present) Town of Marana Staff Bobby Sutton,Jr.,Mayor Mike Hein,Town Manager Eddie Honea,Council Member Dan Hochuli,Town Attorney Michael Reuwsaat,Vice Mayor(absent/excused) Jim Blake,Council Member(absent/excused) Ora Mae Harn,Council Member(absent/excused) Herbert Kai,Council Member(absent/excused) Roxanne Ziegler,Council Member(absent/excused) City of Tucson Elected Officials(No quorum present) City of Tucson Staff Robert E. Walkup,Mayor James Keene,City Manager Jerry Anderson,Council Member—Ward 3 Liz Miller,Assistant City Manager Fred Ronstadt, Council Member—Ward 6 Benny Young,Assistant City Carol West,Council Member-Ward 2 Manager Shirley C. Scott, Council Member—Ward 4 (absent/excused) Michael House,City Attorney Steve Leal,Vice Mayor—Ward 5 (absent/excused) Kathy Detrick,City Clerk Jose I. Ibarra,-Ward 1 (absent/excused) Mary Okoye,Legislative Liaison Pima County Board of Supervisors(No quorum present) Pima County Staff Sharon Bronson,Chair—District 3 Martin Willett,Deputy County Ray Carroll,Board Member—District 4 Administrator Mike Boyd,Board Member—District 1 (absent/excused) Katharina Richter,Chief Civil Dan Eckstrom,Board Member—District 2 (absent/excused) Deputy County Attorney Raul Grijalva,Board Member—District 5 (absent/excused) Lori Godoshian,Clerk of the Board 10/30/00 Joint Meeting/Study Session 10/30/00 2 Town of Sahuarita Elected Officials Town of Sahuarita Staff Jim Bateman,Vice Mayor Gerald Flannery,Town Manager Louis Butler,Council Member Daniel Hochuli,Town Attorney Grace Romo,Council Member Sandra Olivas,Town Clerk Lynne Skelton,Council Member Charles Oldham,Council Member(absent/excused) Karla Derton,Council Member(absent/excused) Zachery Freeland,Mayor(absent/excused) Governor's Office Steve Jewett,Director, So.AZ. Office State Senators State Legislators Ann Day,District 12 Steve Huffman,District 12 Marion Pickens,District 13 State Senator Candidates Legislative Candidates Tim Bee,District 9 Randy Graf,District 9 Mort Nelson,District 12 Pete Hershberger,District 12 Carol Sommers,District 13 Toni Hellon,District 12 Gabriella Gifford,District 13 Board of Supervisor Candidates Ann Day,District 1 Byron Howard,District 1 Barney Brenner,District 3 LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES & TOWNS LEGISLATIVE AWARDS Executive Director of the League of Arizona Cities & Towns Cathy Connolly, presented Awards to the following legislators from Southern Arizona for their consistent support and show of understanding that "Strong Cities Make a Strong State:" Ann Day Steve Huffman Marion Pickens LEGISLATIVE ITEMS The following legislative items were presented: • State Shared Revenues - Mary Okoye, City of Tucson. • Transportation Funding/Vision 21 — Sharon Megdal, MegEcon& Tom Swanson, Executive Director Pima Association of Governments (PAG). • Technology Cluster Funding - Bob Hagen, President, HCS Inc. • Air Quality Funding Opportunities—Ursula Kramer, Director of Environmental Quality for Pima County. REGIONAL TOPICS FOR SPRING MEETING The following topics were suggested for future consideration: 10/30/00 Joint Meeting/Study Session 10/30/00 3 • Growth Management (Tucson Mayor Walkup & Pima County Board Chair Bronson). • Regional Transit and Road Programs (including ADOT) (Tucson Mayor Walkup). • Community Access/Telecommunications (Tucson Council Member Anderson). • Open discussion on legislative issues or other political actions that affect all Southern Arizona jurisdictions. (Oro Valley Council Member Johnson). Future Topic: • Session with youth from around Pima County to discuss actions that would be helpful to them and to help make their lives more positive. (Tucson Council Member West). Next Host Site—Marana, Arizona ADJOURNMENT—8:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, /42tfx, C-tw-tiLA-1 Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Oro Valley Town Clerk DRAFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL AND WATER UTILITY COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION NOVEMBER 13,2000 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA JOINT STUDY SESSION WITH WATER UTILITY COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER—7:05 PM PRESENT: Oro Valley Town Council: Paul Loomis, Mayor Fran LaSala, Vice Mayor Dick Johnson, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member Water Utility Commission Member: John Dohnogne, Chair Mike Caporaso, Vice Chair Leo Leonhart, Member LaQuita Stec, Member Jennifer Gillaspie, Member Gordon Byrnes, Member Gregg Forszt, Member 1. PRESENTATION OF VIRTUAL TOUR OF TUCSON ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA (TAMA) BY KEN SEASHOLS, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Mr. Ken Seasholes of the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) gave a"Virtual Tour" of the Tucson Active Management Area (TAMA), regarding: • Orientation • Demographics • Economy • Physical Setting • Demand • Supply 11/13/00 Minutes,Joint Study Session -2 Town Council&Water Utility Commission • Budget • Historic Trends • Projections • Water Use Sectors • Agriculture • Industry • Metal Mining • Municipal • Themes • Politics • CAP • Environment • Trends & Accomplishments • Challenges & Issues The following issues were discussed regarding: • The offset to farmers • Arizona Department of Water Resources participation • Getting agriculture and metal mining to use more renewable water • Active programs that have funding the Town could participate in Mayor Loomis thanked Mr. Seasholes for his presentation and stated that it was an eye-opening report that was very well done. Mayor Loomis adjourned the joint study session and called for a recess at 8:05 p.m. Mayor Loomis reconvened the study session at 8:17 p.m. 2. TANGERINE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT—PRESENTATION OF 30% DESIGN CONCEPT REVIEW AND DESIGN ELEMENTS. Town Engineer Bill Jansen reviewed the key issues surrounding the development of the Design Concept Report, the environmental issues and cost detail. He stated that if Council approves the proposal, staff would begin the design for the plans, specification and the construction on the specific areas of the project. g g He then introduced Paul Nzomo, the Town's Civil Engineer. Mr. Nzomo introduced Bill Schlesinger, P.E. for Catalina Engineer, Inc. Mr. Schlesinger gave an overview of the Design Concept Report using slides and the overhead projector, g and the following topics were discussed: • Project Team • Existing Conditions • Drainage Crossings • Existing Right-of-Way 11/13/00 Minutes,Joint Study Session - 3 - Town Council&Water Utility Commission • Corridor Issues • Existing Conditions • Alternatives • Alternative Ranking • Design Features of Selected Alternative • Proposed Cross Section • Design Feature of Selected Alternative Mr. Jansen explained that staff has been developing a cost proposal for a 4-lane road, rather than 2-lanes. He explained that Pima County Association of Government (PAG) felt confident that the financing could be worked out to advance the funding for the project. He contemplates acquiring another 3.5 million dollars for the project and that staff would go out for bid 1 year from now. In response to a question from. Council Member Johnson, Mr. Jansen explained that the speed limits would be designed to accommodate the area. He said that staff would definitely investigate the possibility of installing a detached path. He explained that the funding has been programmed for the improvement of Tangerine Road to the west of the Town limits, wherever they may occur. The intersection extension of La Canada that extends north will be a signalized intersection. He stated that staff recently released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the consultant selection for the La Canada Drive extension. In response to a question from Vice Mayor LaSala, Mr. Schlesinger stated that the estimated construction time would be 9 months to 1 years. Vice Mayor LaSala asked if there would be enough room along the design path to accommodate the transit service at the intersection. Mr. Jansen replied "yes." In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Jansen explained that Marana's key interest was the west end link improvements for Tangerine Road. He added that Pima County was definitely not looking into any upgrades for the area at this time. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. The following citizens were in attendance seeking information on the proposed Tangerine Road reconstruction. • Tom Costello, 180 East Tangerine Road • Robert Lyons, Palmetto Dune Avenue • Kathy Seabreng, 11930 North Joi • Kathy Becker, 11915 North Joi • James Vater, 11440 North Palmetto Dune Avenue Mayor Loomis informed the public that all general questions would be answered after the meeting. 11/13/00 Minutes,Joint Study Session -4 Town Council&Water Utility Commission The following issues were discussed regarding the development and improvement of Tangerine Road: • Weight restrictions • Noise control • Underground utility service • Easements • Right-of-ways ADJOURNMENT Mayor Loomis MOVED to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda Hersha, Secretary II Oro Valley Clerk's Office B TOWN OF ORO VALLEY r -OUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David L. Andrews, Finance Director SUBJECT: Budget and Bond Committee Report to Council for Quarter Ended September 30, 2000 SUMMARY: The Town's Budget and Bond Committee held its regular meeting on November 6, 2000. The purpose of the meeting and in accordance with its rules and operating procedures was to review the budget to actual comparisons of revenues and expenditures through the quarter ended September 30, 2000. Additionally, the committee reviewed Town use of long-term debt proceeds and the annual financial audit. The audit will be presented in a separate agenda item. Attached are the minutes from the committee's November 6 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft minutes of the November 6, 2000 Budget and Bond Committee Finance Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 BUDGET AND BOND COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Committee recommended the forwarding of its report to the Town Council for approval. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the Budget and Bond Committee report to Council for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 reviewed by the Budget and Bond Committee. or I move to ... 2.).A.44;2 a`444-.-./1.----- David L. Andrews Fi nce Directo „itazi `0 Chuck Swee Town Manager ti • 1 MINUTES Town of Oro Valley Budget and Bond Committee Hopi Room 11,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona DRAFT Monday, November 6, 2000 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Werner Wolff, Councilmember Vito Tedeschi, Chairman Tom Polley, Member Bob Schlichting, Member ABSENT: James Swan, Member Louis Dudas, Member STAFF PRESENT: David Andrews, Finance Director Mary Rallis, Senior Accountant Suzette Krueger, Administrative Assistant Dennis Osuch, Cromstrom & Trbovich 1. Approval of Minutes from July 24, 2000 Committee Meeting There were no changes to the minutes as submitted. MOTION: Tom Polley MOVED to approve the minutes from the July 24, 2000 meeting. Bob Schlichting SECONDED the motion, which carried 3-0. 2. Committee Election of Vice-Chairman Vito Tedeschi, Chairman, stated that he had spoke with Louis Dudas, who declined the seat of Vice-Chairman. MOTION: Tom Polley MOVED to elect Bob Schlichting as Vice-Chairman of the Budget and Bond Committee. Chairman Tedeschi SECONDED the motion, which carried 3-0. 1 3. Review and Recommendation Regarding Town of Oro Valley's FYE June 30, 2000 Financial Audit by Cronstrom & Trbovich, Certified Professional Accountants Mr. Andrews introduced Dennis Osuch of Cronstrom & Trbovich to present the audit results. Mrq . Osuch stated that an unqualified opinion means that there were no findings in the audit. He reviewed the budget variances that are outlined in the transmittal letter. The balance of the audit was reviewed with questions from the members. MOTION: Mr. SchlichtingMOVED that the Town's financial audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 be forwarded to the Town Council with a favorable recommendation for Council acceptance. Mr. Polley SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 3-0. 4. Review and Recommendation Regarding Town Use of Proceeds from 1999 Municipal Property Corporation Excise Tax Revenue Bonds Mary Rallis, Senior Accountant, explained the remaining funds for the 1999 Municipal Property Corporation Excise Tax Revenue Bonds are for water improvements. These p Y p are restricted funds that are for that particular use only. Ms. Rallis stated that the balance of the bond will be spent in this fiscal year. MOTION: Mr. Polleymoved to forward the report with a list of projects that the . remainingfunds willgo towards to the Town Council with a favorable recommendation for Council acceptance. Mr. Schlichting SECONDED the motion which carried 3-0. 5. Review and Recommendation Regarding First Quarter Ended September 30, 2000 Budget to Actual Review of Town Revenues and Expenditures/Expenses Ms. Rallis reviewed the General Fund Revenues, which are tracking to budget. She explained that there are timing issues which contribute to selected revenue figures which are below budget. Chairman Tedeschi requested that a footnote be added to the items in which this applies. He also requested that the pages be enumerated. Mr. pp Andrews stated that revenues are tracking to budget but building permit issuances are being closely monitored. Chairman Tedeschi requested that extra emphasis be placed on the relationship between the building permit fees collected and the Planning and Zoning and Building Safety departmental expenditure budgets. MOTION: Mr. SchlichtingMOVED to forward the report to the Town Council with a favorable recommendation for Council acceptance with the provision that an eye be kept on the relationshipbetween the fees collected and the Planning and Zoning and Building Safety departmental de artmental budgets. Mr. Polley SECONDED the motion which carried 3-0. 2 r 6. Review and Possible Action Regarding the Town of Oro Valley's Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Chairman Tedeschi explained that this item was requested by the committee at it's last meeting. Mr. Andrews reviewed the Town's current fiscal and budgetary policy and how it applies to the current fiscal year's budget. He explained that the 25% policy is in place because of the Town's dependency on construction related revenues. Chuck Sweet, Town Manager and Mr. Andrews recently returned from a bond rating trip. Mr. Andrews stated that Fitch gave the Town an A+ rating. Chairman Tedeschi suggested that Mr. Andrews come up with a policy where the reserveolic percentage relate to the construction revenue percentage of the total p Y budget. This item was continued until the next committee meeting. 7. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Departmental Assignments to Committee Members Chairman Tedeschi explained that Mayor Loomis would like the Budget and Bond Committee members more involved in the budget review process. Departmental assignments were reviewed by the committee members. MOTION: Mr. Polley MOVED to approve the departmental selections as presented. Mr. Schlichting SECONDED the motion, which carried 3-0. 8. Appointment of Budget and Bond Committee member to the Town's Capital Improvements Program Chairman Tedeschi reported that he attended the previous Capital Improvements Pro ram (CIP) meeting. He explained the requests and projects and the function of the g program. MOTION: Mr. Schlichting MOVED to appoint the Chairman of the Budget and Bond Committee to serve on the Capital Improvement Plan Technical Advisory Committee. Chairman Tedeschi SECONDED the motion which carried 3-0. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Mr. Polley MOVED to adjourn the meeting at 8:27 p.m. Motion SECONDED by Mr. Schlichting. Motion carried, 3-0. Respectfully submitted, Suzette Krueger, Administrative Assistant 3 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ^ COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: David L. Andrews, Finance Director SUBJECT: Finance Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000 SUMMARY: Attached to this communication is the Finance Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000. GENERAL FUND: Select points are as follows: Overall, general fund revenues for the first quarter of the fiscal year are tracking to budget. q> Overall, sales tax collections from all industries are tracking to budget. Residential building permit fee collections of$322K are estimated to meet the annual budget amount of$1,254K. State/county shared revenues are tracking to budget. Federal and state grant revenues are under budget due to timing differences in collecting from outside agencies. q> Departmental expenditures are under budget. Other Funds q> State shared fuels taxes are tracking to budget. q> Collections from Townwide roadway development impact fees are annualizing at a rate that is approximately 76% of the annual budget amount of$1,633,880. Collections will be closely monitored using last fiscal year as a baseline for comparison. Water connection fees revenues are annualizing at an 86% rate and will also be closely monitored. Collections may be down due to the significant spike in permits last fiscal year, prior to impact fee increases. September collections did improve over August. COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PAGE 2 OF 2 Oro Valley Water Utility q. Current retained earnings are $2,376,170. Revenues from water sales are estimated to exceed budget based on current collections. t:1;5 Capital expenses are below budget. q). Cash from operations is exceeding budget by $107,941. David L. Andrews Finance Director / ( gitrAL,-w A Chuck Sweet Town Manager CC: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager All Department Heads Town of Oro Valley GENERAL FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through September 30, 2000 Percentage of Year Completed 3/12 = 25.0% 2000/2001 Percentage September Y-T-D Total of Budget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: Local Taxes $ 405,937 $ 954,084 $ 5,857,000 16.3% State/County Shared 406,328 1,024,411 4,885,000 21.0% Fines16,784 52,439 220,000 23.8% Licenses & Permits 153,547 373,117 2,002,300 18.6%ar ,Licenses es for Services 31,861 80,014 272,800 29.3% 'Federal Federal Grants 12,300 53,308 532,050 10.0% State Grants 3,679 23,361 259,554 9.0% Interest Earnings 76,051 , 115,745 275,000 42.1% Miscellaneous 1,398 14,914 29,200 51.1% Bond Proceeds - - 2,700,000 0.0% Transfer From LibraryConstruction Fund - - 144,000 0.0% Carryforward9,269,414 Ad'. To Reconcile To Ex•enditure Limitation 980 000 TOTAL REVENUES 1,107,885 2,691,393 25,466,318 18.8% EXPENDITURES: Town Council 6,935 28,592 107,552 26.6% Town Clerk 21,461 _ 53,019 225,355 23.5% 'strate Court 34,061 82,755 429,646 1 19.3% a _in Manager 27,455 57,354 263,308 21.8% Human Resources 19,128 41,154 191,244 , 21.5% Economic Development 19,714 38,552 311,599 12.4% Finance 48,839 100,725 , 371,370 27.1% Information Systems 10,815 40,023 173,393 23.1% Legal 37,809 88,456 551,887 16.0% ,Community Development ment Administration 19,441 63,442 366,533 17.3% PlanningZoning& 109,830 262,689 1,455,320 18.1% Parks & Recreation r 74,835 190,880 1,107,067 17.2% Library Services 12,421 17,336 138,640 12.5% Police 632,037 1,356,107 6,426,233 21.1% Police- Capital Contingency - - 101,654 0.0% 5°/ 101,867 216,739 1,172,524 18 Building Safety ° Custodial & Facility Maintenance 32,731 38,147 120,297 31.7% General Administration: . Operations & Maintenance 5,439 ' 56,472 441,703 12.8% Improvements 17,082 18,428 574,000 3.2% Vehicles & Equipment - - 15,000 0.0% Land - - 3,075,000 0.0% Transfers to Other Funds - 614,257 2,248,226 27.3% Cont i ngency/Reserve5,598,767 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ', $ 1,231,900 , $ 3,365,127 , $ 25,466,318 16.9% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ (124,015) $ (673,734) 'D BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2000 $ 10,470,788 '* CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 9,797,054 U * Pre audit figure. Town of Oro Valley HIGH WA Y FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through September 30, 2000 Percentage of Year Completed 3/12 = 25.0% 2000/2001 Percentage September Y-T-D Total of Budget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: State Shared Fuels Tax , $ 129,843 $ 257,631 $ 1,729,000 14.9% Other Revenues 21,663 36,733 74,600 49.2% Carryforward of Fund Balance 1,938,067 TOTAL REVENUES 151,506 294,364 , 3,741,667 16.3% EXPENDITURES: Personnel 76,838 187,240 965,788 19.4% Operations & Maintenance 38,251 102,362 802,249 12.8% Capital Improvements 88,113 133,920 1,046,620 12.8% Equipment & Vehicles - 20,514 195,000 10.5% Lease Purchase Payments - - 12,431 0.0% ,Contingency 719,579 , TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 203,202 , $ 444,036 $ 3,741,667 14.7% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ (51,696) $ (149,672) FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2000 $ 2,252,464 * • CURRENT FUND BALANCE _ $ 2,102,792 * Pre audit figure. Town of Oro Valley PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through September 30, 2000 Percentage of Year Completed 3/12 = 25.0% 2000/2001 Percentage September Y-T-D Total of Budget Actuals i Actuals Budget _ Completed REVENUES.' - HB 2565 State Grant $ - $ - $ 96,176 0.0% Local Transportation Assistance Funds 16,696 35,432 162,000 21.9% Other 2,544 7,597 25,000 30.4% Carryforward of Fund Balance 157,700 TOTAL R VENUES 19,240 43,029 440,876 15.2% EXPENDITURES: Personnel 16,151 38,179 220,642 17.3% Operations & Maintenance 1,727 7,636 72,710 10.5% Improvements - - 5,000 ,000 0.0% m Vehicles - 57,000 0.0% Contingency 85,524 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 17,878 $ 45,815 � $ 440,876 12.9% ''ENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 1,362 $ (2,786) FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2000 $ 187,097 * CURRENT FUND BALANCE _ $ 184,311 * Pre audit figure. Town of Oro Valley TOWNWIDE ROAD WAY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through September 30, 2000 Percentage of Year Completed 3/12 = 25.0% 2000/2001 Percentage September Y-T-D Total of Budget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed, REVENUES: PAG Reimbursement $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - 100.0% Interest-Investments 45,892 72,613 200,000 36.3% Development Impact Fees 118,780 310,012 1,633,880 19.0% Carryforward of Fund Balance - - 5,558,926 TOTAL REVENUES 214,672 , 432,625 7,392,806 23.6% EXPENDITURES: Personnel 8,339 , 18,338 188,155 9.7% Operations & Maintanence 541 , 2,775 81,700 3.4% Capital Improvements 148,524 315,958 2,980,000 10.6% .fr. -hinery & Equipment - - 3,800 0.0% ri n•enc - - 4 139 151 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 157,404 $ 337,071 $ 7,392,806 10.4% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 57,268 $ 95,554 FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2000 $ 6,528,366 ,* CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 6,623,920 * Pre audit figure. Town of Oro Valley LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through September 30, 2000 Percentage of Year Completed 3/12 =25.0% 2000/2001 Percentage September Y-T-D Total of Budget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: Pima County Bond Proceeds $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 0.0% Bond Proceeds - - 3,080,000 0.0% , TOTAL REVENUES - - , 5,080,000 0.0% EXPENDITURES: Outside Professional Services - - 72,000 0.0% Bond Issuance Costs - - 100,000 0.0% Improvements 23,434 52,708 2,754,000 , 1.9% Machiner & E ui ment - - 1,630,000 0.0% Y � Transfer to General Fund - - 144,000 0.0% C( igency - - 4 380,000 Tt,,AL EXPENDITURES 5 23,434 i 5 52,708 i S 5,080,000 1.1% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES ' $ (23,434), $ (52,708) FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2000 $ 73,371 '* CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 20,663 _ _ ''' Pre audit figure. Town of Oro Valley DENNIS WEAVER POOL RENOVATION PROJECT FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through September 30, 2000 Percentage of Year Completed 3/12 = 25.0% 2000/2001 Percentage September Y-T-D Total of Budget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: - Transfer From General Fund $ - , $ - 1,000,000 0.0% TOTAL REVENUES - - 1,000,000 0.0% EXPENDITURES: Improvements - - 11000,000 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ 11000,000 0.0% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ - $ - FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2000 _ $ - CURRENT FUND BALANCE _ $ - _ _ Town of Oro Valley ORO VALLEY WATER CONNECTION FEES FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through September 30, 2000 Percentage of Year Completed 3/12 = 25.0% 2000/2001 Percentage September Y-T-D Total of Budget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: Connection Fees $ 139,392 $ 366,009 $ 1,717,800 21.3% Interest-Investments 12,648 19,038 44,125 43.1% Bond Proceeds - - 8,075,000 0.0% Transfer from GF - - 360,000 0.0% Carryforward of Fund Balance 1,03 5,97 2 TOTAL REVENUES 152,040 385,047 11,232,897 21.9% EXPENDITURES: _ _ Bond Issuance Costs - - 775,000 0.0% Capital Outlay - 58,292 1,050,000 , 5.6% p Debt Service Payments 8,516 , 8,516 1,159,396 0.7% Contingency , 8,248,501 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 8,516 $ 66,808 , $ 11,232,897 2.2%, P 'WES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 143,524 $ 318,239 FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2000 , $ 1,159,384 * CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 1,477,623 _ * Pre audit figure. Town of Oro Valley ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY Budgeted Income Sta temen t Through September 30, 2000 Percentage of Year Completed 3/12 = 250% 2000/2001 Percentage September Y-T-D Total of Budget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed OPERATING REVENUES: Water Revenues $ 599,587 $ 1,399,705 $ 6,304,700 22.2% Service Charges & Meter Income 30,510 94,883 273,000 34.8% TOTAL REVENUES 630,097 1,494,588 6,577,700 22.7% OPERATING EXPENSES: Personnel 120,028 268,686 1,199,576 22.4% Operations & Maintenance 127,086 416,910 2,227,183 18.7% ,Depreciation & Amortization 112,381 337,143 1,377,200 24.5% , TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 359,495 1,022,739 4,803,959 21.3% OPERATING INCOME 270,602 471,849 1,773,741 26.6% NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) 'erest Income 48,101 82,563 300,000 27.5% �.1 rerest , Expense 133,120 399,360 2,061,911 19.4% p TOTAL NONOPERA TING REVENUES (EXPENSES) (85,019) (316,797) (1,761,911) NET INCOME $ -185,583 $ 155,052 $ 11,830 RETAINED EARNINGS AT July 1, 2000 * $ 2,221,118 $ 1,359,264 CURRENT RETAINED EARNINGS $ 2,376,170 $ 1,371,094 * Pre audit figure. Town of Oro Valley ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY Cash & Capital Budgets Through September 30, 2000 budget Current OT vver/ Category Balance 6/30/01LUndei) 'Cash from Operations $ 5,037,635 $ 4,929,694 $ 107,941 1999 MPC Bond Proceeds 730,133 - 730,133 2000 Bond Proceeds - 1,472,050 (1,472,050) `Debt Service Reserves 2,287,940 2,287,940 - I otots 8,055,708 8,689,684 (633,976) September Y-T-D 2000/2001 % Budget .AP ITAL BUDGET Actuals Actuals Total Budget Completed , Aachinery Equipment& E ui ment $ 2,754 $ 2,754 $ 33,600 8.2% Vehicles 1,140 28,852 28,000 103.0% 43,834 150,000 29.2% Meters 17,376 - Wells 53,674 107,925 700,000 15.4% Booster Stations 6,690 6,690 250,000 2.7% Transmission/Distribution Main 42,470 116,832 2,007,650 5.8% Reservoirs - 82,101 3,305,000 2.5% Hydrants - - 86,400 0.0% Telemetry 58,596 90,597 159,500 56.8% Structures 1,318 1,455 90,000 1.6% TOTAL CAPITAL BUDGET $ 184,018 $ 481,040 $ 6,810,150 7.1% r MEMORANDUM TO: Parks & Recreation Advisory Board rt FROM: Ainsley 'L_ • Anne Reeder Parks & Recreation Administrator DATE: November 9, 2000 RE: Parks & Recreation Monthly Status Report—November 1. Trails Task Force: The first Trails Task Force meeting was held in October. On November 4, the group spent four hours in the field completing trail assessments and developing a list of questions for further review and study. Their next meeting will be on Thursday, December 14, 2000 at 6 p.m. at Town Hall. Mr. Joe Winfield was elected as Chair. 2. CDO Access Trail (formerly known as the southern access to Logan's Crossing Trail): A number of trail users, lead by Trails Task Force Member Chuck LeForge, have completed the fence relocation on the trail property recently purchased by the Town. All of the barbed wire fencing has been removed from the area and has been replaced with smooth wire. Additionally, a small trail has been established across the easement on the northeast side to allow for safe passage through the area. The hard work of Mr. LeForge and the rest of the volunteers is greatly appreciated. 3. 1St and Oracle Bicycle/Pedestrian Oasis To Be Repaired: There has been no change in the status of this project. 4. Fall 2000 Hikes: The Fall Hiking Series continues to be very popular. The preference is to accept 20 participants per hike. However, there was such an overwhelming number of people interested in the Seven Falls hike in November that staff agreed to take 25. (There was over 25 people on the waiting list.) Unfortunately, this trip was cancelled due to inclement weather. The December 9 hike is to Sabino Canyon Esperero Trail, and the January 6 hike will follow Kings Canyon Trail to Wasson Peak. Please call Lynanne Dellerman, Recreation/Volunteer Coordinator, at 229-5052 if you are interested in participating. (Flyer included in packet.) 5. In-Line Skating Classes: Classes for beginning in-line skaters will begin on November 19 at CDO Riverfront Park. Fast Eddie, a nationally ranked skater, will teach the basics of skating safely, stopping, turning, edge control, and other popular skating techniques. (Flyer included in packet.) 6. Dennis Weaver Park Projects: The Parks and Recreation staff is working closely with other Town Departments to insure that all projects in the immediate area of Dennis Weaver Park are coordinated appropriately. Subsequently, there may be adjustments in project schedules. Staff will keep PRAB informed of these adjustments as they arise. • ENHANCED AVIAN HABITAT / TRAILS: Lynanne Dellerman, Recreation/Volunteer Coordinator, is researching the availability of grants to support the development of the Avian Habitat. The project will resume upon completion of a water line installation to be done in the area. The water line is expected to be in no later than March of 2001. Staff will keep PRAB informed of the progress in this area. • DENNIS WEAVER POOL: Construction on the pool renovation project began on October 26. The contractor is making good progress with the demolition, and the project in on schedule. • NEW PARKING LOT: The Planning and Zoning Division is currently reviewing the plans for this project. The parking lot construction will begin upon completion of the water line referenced above. 7. Tree Lighting Ceremony: The Parks and Recreation Division is organizing a Tree Lighting Ceremony at Town Hall on November 30. Singers from Painted Sky Elementary, Wilson Middle School, and CDO High School have accepted an invitation to provide entertainment for the event. Festivities, to begin at 5:00, will also include Santa, a toy collection sponsored by the Police Department for families in need, and light refreshments. Anyone wishing to volunteer during this event may call Lynanne Dellerman, Recreation/Volunteer Coordinator, at 229-5052. 8. Staff: Mr. Jason Schlieben, Parks Maintenance Operator I, has resigned from the Parks and Recreation Division effective November 17. Mr. Schlieben is returning to his home in Michigan to seek his graduate degree in Parks and Recreation. C Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director Chuck Sweet, Town Manager TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Ron Koslowski, Fire Advisory Board Chairman SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF TERMS FOR THE FIRE ADVISORY BOARD SUMMARY: On May 17, 2000 citizens were appointed to serve on the Fire Advisory Board to study and make recommendations to the Town Council as outlined in their Scope of Work: • Oro Valley Evaluation of Emergency and Non-Emergency Services • Fire Advisory Committee and Citizen's Focus Group recommendations for Oro Valley Fire & EMS Strategic Plan • Oro Valley Strategic Plan for Fire and Emergency Medical Services To date, members of the Fire Advisory Boards have held 8 meetings and have studied the following issues: • Established recommended Perfomance Standards (completed) • Established recommended Non-Emergency Service provided by fire departments (completed) • ISO Rating recommendation (completed) Issues yet to be studied: • Recommendations on how to provide fire services, short-term and long-term • Cost of implementing recommended Performance Standards It is the Fire Advisory Board's intention to submit recommendations to the Town Council at the completion of all short-term and long-term goals. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to extend the terms of the Fire Advisory Board for an additional six months effective 11-16-00 — 05-16-01 in order to allow them time to complete the Scope of Work approved by the Mayor and Council on May 16, 2000. ') .� ,:.►.. A yo. P • .:rt. ent H-• : Town Manager r- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. (R)00- 103 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR STREET NAMING AND ADDRESSING SERVICES,2000 BACKGROUND: This agreement is to provide for continued service from Pima County for checking and authorizing the names of new streets and for assigning addresses to new lots. The attached IGA is the result of a meeting and a number of . telephone conversations between Town and County The original IGA proposed that the Town would p reimburse the County from $16,000 to over $20,000 each year for street naming and addressing services. However, in a subsequent meeting with County staff (Judy Patrick, the former Development Services Administrator and Jack Avis, GIS Manager) we agreed to provide them with digital plat and plan information in a timely manner and, in return, they agreed to reduce the fees they would charge us. As per section 14b on page 4 of the IGA, they are now proposing a per-plat or per-plan fee of$140 plus $40 per hour for review time. This s only slightly higher than the 1986 IGA ($100 and $35 per hour). It is very reasonah"2, considering the time 1116. volved, and it is a fee that is reimbursed to the Town by.the developer. SUMMARY: The key elements of the IGA are: Section 2, p.1. We will need to set up a process to hear and decide appeals of addressing conflicts. Section 4 and 5, p. 2. We will continue to process street name changes and non-conforming addresses as we are now processing them. Section 7, p. 3. Public Works will need to submit all street realignment proposals to the County for review. The County already reviews street realignments included with development projects. Section 9, p. 3. Though not specifically stated herein, the Town has agreed to try to provide County Addressing with digital versions of plats and plans at the preliminary plat stage as well the final plat stage. The Code will need to be changed to require digital preliminary plat and development plan submittals. Given the time to notify the development community and work with them to change the Code, the County does not expect this to take effect immediately. Section 11, starting on p. 3. We are already verifying addresses in the permitting process. Building Safety is setting up the new Sierra to only use approved addresses, directly from the County's database, on permits. Section 14, p. 4. The County charges as discussed above. _:,gal has reviewed the IGA and finds that it is acceptable. I also discussed the IGA with the Town Engineer, who had no concerns. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY V 9UNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the attached IGA. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the Intergovernmental Agreement Between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for Street Naming and Addressing Services, 2000. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Number (R) 00-103 2. Intergovernmental Agreement Between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for Street Naming and Addressing Services, 2000 ALA fal 60L-. Plann g . Zoning Administrator Community Development Director OL41144f°4 ---- Town Manager F:\PROJECTS\Pima County\IGAs\Addressing IGA TC report.doc RESOLUTION NO. (R)00- 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO CLARIFY AND SPECIFY EACH JURISDICTION'S RESPONSIBKILITIEIS FOR PROVIDING ADRESSING SERVICES FOR ALL PARCELS AND DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE ORO VALLEY TOWN LIMITS WHEREAS, it is deemed in the public interest to establish and intergovernmental agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County to act jointly and ensure the provision of County services to maintain uniformity in street naming and addressing, eliminate inconsistencies in the same, and facilitate emergency vehicle response. WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County desire to establish the authority for the creation of addresses to property and improvements with the jurisdictional limits of the Town of Oro Valley. NOW THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY THAT: Section 1. The Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley, herewith attached as Exhibit 1, is hereby approved. Section 2. The Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley is herby authorized to execute the Intergovernmental Agreement on behalf of the Town. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 6th day of December , 2000. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan Dudley, Town Attorney • c RESOLUTION AND ORDER NO. 2000 RESOLUTION OF THE PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO CLARIFY AND SPECIFY EACH JURISDICTION'S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PROVIDING ADRESSING SERVICES FOR ALL PARCELS AND DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE ORO VALLEY TOWN LIMITS WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the public interest to establish an intergovernmental agreement, pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-951 et. sec., between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County to act jointly and provide County services to maintain uniformity in street naming and numerical addressing, eliminate inconsistencies in and duplication of street names, and facilitate emergency vehicle response. WHEREAS, Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley desire to establish the authority for the creation of addresses to property and improvements within the jurisdictional boundaries of the Town of Oro Valley. WHEREAS, a copy of the Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and Oro Valley is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit 1. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, PIMA COUNTY ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION 1. The Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to execute ` R the Intergovernmental Agreement on behalf of Pima County. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2000. PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTEST: CHAIRPERSON CLERK OF THE BOARD APPROVED AS TO FORM: ' rq DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and The Town of Oro Valley for Street Naming and Addressing Services 2000 , . Table of Contents Recitals 1 1. Administrative Authority 1 2. Appeal Procedure 1 3. Street Names 2 4. Town Processing of Street Name Changes 2 5. Addresses 2 a. Voluntary address changes 2 b. Involuntary address changes and address corrections 2 c. Non-conforming address changes 2 6. Address Record 2 7. Street Alignments 3 8. Subdivision Plat and Development Plans 3 9. Recorded Map and Plat Copies to County 3 10. Final Approved Subdivisions, Development Plans and Street Names 3 11. Town Duty to Require Addressing 3 a. Address for a Parcel or Commercial Development 3 b. Tenant Improvement in Existing Commercial Development not on File with County 3 c. Commercial Multi-building or Multi-tenant Projects 4 12. Town Duty to Require Signage and Address Display 4 a. Street Signs 4 b. Address Display. 4 13. CDRC Meetings 4 14. Budget and Billing 4 15. Books and Records 4 16. Compliance with All Laws 4 17. Non-Discrimination 5 18. Notification 5 19. Entire Agreement 5 20. Legal Jurisdiction 5 21. Effective Date; Term 5 22. Termination 5 a. Termination for Convenience 5 b. Termination for Cause 5 c. A.R.S. §38-511 6 d. Non-Appropriation 6 e. Obligations after Termination 6 Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and The Town of Oro Valley for Street Naming and Addressing Services This Intergovernmental Agreement is entered into by and between Pima County, a body politic and corporate of the State of Arizona, ("County") and the Town of Oro Valley ("Town") pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952. Recitals A. County and Town may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-951, et seq. B. County and Town desire to act jointly and provide County services to maintain uniformity in street naming and numerical addressing, eliminate inconsistencies in and duplication of street names, and facilitate emergency vehicle response. C. County and Town desire to establish the authority for the creation of addresses to property and improvements within the jurisdictional boundaries of the Town of Oro Valley. Now, Therefore, County and Town, pursuant to the above, and in consideration of the matters and things hereinafter set forth, do mutually agree as follows: Agreement 1. Administrative Authority. County shall review and assign street names and addresses for all parcels and development within the Oro Valley Town limits. 2. Appeal Procedure. Town shall have administrative jurisdiction to hear and decide appeals of addressing conflicts. Town shall: a. Designate an appeal hearing official or body; b. Establish an appeal process in its Town Code; and c. Notify County of appeals decisions. 1 3. Street Names. County shall review and approve all submitted street names, both public and private, for new or renamed street segments. County shall assign street names to all private roads or easements as may be necessary to facilitate proper addressing in unsubdivided areas and process the names for official adoption. County will transmit written responses to Town within ten working days following receipt of complete review documents. 4. Town Processing of Street Name Changes. Town shall process street name changes as requested by County and notify County as to effective date within five working days. 5. Addresses. County shall assign addresses, in accordance with Pima County Code, Chapter 18.83,Addressing Standards, and County Policies, to all parcels and developments within the Oro Valley Town limits upon submittal of proper documentation and materials. a. Voluntary address changes. County shall review, assign and process all voluntary requests for change of addresses. b. Involuntary address changes and address corrections. County shall review, assign and process address corrections and coordinate with Town all involuntary address changes as may be required to facilitate proper assignment of new addresses. County shall notify Town of address changes. c. Non-conforming address changes. Town staff shall research, field verify and document existing non-conforming addresses and street names in residential and commercial projects at Town's expense, and shall submit the information to County for new address assignment. County shall assign correct addresses for any non-conforming address when notified by Town. 6. Address Records. a. County shall record and maintain, on a master document, all assigned addresses of: i. All lots in subdivision maps and plats recorded in the Office of the Pima County Recorder; ii. All new approved development plans, tentative plats (when appropriate) and approved site plans involving multi-tenant and multi-building applications. b. County shall record and maintain, on a master document, all changes of addresses for existing subdivided and commercial projects. (Exceptions: some old commercial projects may not have site plan availability.) c. County shall perform all activities necessary to update and maintain addresses on a master document. 2 d. County shall record and maintain all assigned addresses on any commercial development in existence prior to the effective date of the first intergovernmental agreement for street naming and addressing, subject to site plan availability indicating all buildings, tenant spaces and current numbering. 7. Street Alignments. Town shall transmit to County all proposed street realignment proposals at beginning of the initial reviews stages and all subsequent submittals. County shall review and comment on all proposed street alignments and realignments. County will transmit written responses to Town within ten working days of receipt of complete review documents. 8. Subdivision Plat and Development Plans. County shall review all subdivision plat and development plan submittals for addressing requirements. County will transmit written responses to Town within ten working days of receipt of complete review documents. 9. Recorded Map and Plat Copies to County. Town shall provide County photographic mylars of recorded maps and plats after recordation as source documents for addressing purposes. 10. Final Approved Subdivisions, Development Plans and Street Names. Town shall transmit to Pima County final approved subdivisions, development plans and street names when written clearance is received from County Addressing. 11. Town Duty to Require Addressing. Town shall verify and use assigned addresses, as indicated on microfiche copies of assigned addresses provided by County, in approving Town plats, development plans and other land use regulations and in issuing Town permits. Those individuals not having an assigned address will be sent to County for assignment. a. Address for a Parcel or Commercial Development. Town shall require any applicant desiring an address for a parcel or commercial development to obtain from County the proper address for each site, structure or tenant improvement prior to building permit issuance. b. Tenant Improvement in Existing Commercial Development not on File with County. In the event any applicant desires a new address for a tenant improvement within an existing commercial development which is not on file with County, Town shall require the applicant to provide a sketch plan showing the building with all currently displayed addresses and the dimensional location of the requested tenant improvement. County shall assign new addresses for tenant improvements in existing commercial projects not on file after receipt of the sketch plan. c. Commercial Multi-building or Multi-tenant Projects. Town shall require any applicant requesting addresses for new commercial multi-building or multi-tenant projects to provide County with required map documents. Town shall verify prior to release of 3 building permits on any new commercial multi-building or multi-tenant project that applicant has a Receipt of All Required Addressing Documents from County. 12. Town Duty to Require Signage and Address Display. a. Street Signs. Town shall expeditiously install or require the installation of street signs for all new and renamed streets on the effective date. b. Address Display. Town shall field verify that all assigned addresses are permanently displayed and all street signage (when appropriate) are installed with correct spelling prior to occupancy permit issuance. 13. Meetings. County shall attend development review meetings as required by the Town 14. Budget and Billing. a. Town and County shall establish a budget and make annual appropriation of funds to finance the duties and activities called for in this Agreement. b. Town shall pay County $140 for subdivision plats or developments plans, plus $40 hr for review, comments, address assignment, maintenance and information dissemination. In each subsequent year of this Agreement, the amount shall increase three percent. c. County shall send a quarterly bill to Town for services rendered. 15. Books and Records. Each Party shall keep and maintain proper and complete books, records and accounts and the same shall be open for inspection and audit by duly authorized representatives of the other Party at all reasonable times. 16. Compliance with All Laws. The Parties shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, standards and Executive Orders, without limitation to those designated within this Agreement. Any changes in the governing laws, rules and regulations during the terms of this Agreement shall apply but do not require an amendment. 17. Non-Discrimination. This Agreement is subject to Governor's Executive Order 99-4 which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as if set forth in full herein. 18. Notification. All notices or demands upon any party to this agreement shall be in writing, unless other forms are designated elsewhere, and shall be delivered in person or sent by mail addressed as follows: Town of Oro Valley Pima County Director, Planning & Zoning Department Director, Development Services 11000 N. La Canada Dr 201 N. Stone, 1st floor Oro Valley, Arizona 85713 Tucson, Arizona 85701 4 19. Entire Agreement. This document contains the entire agreement between the Parties and it may not be modified, amended, altered or extended except through a written amendment signed by the Parties. 20. Legal Jurisdiction. a. Nothing in this Intergovernmental Agreement shall be construed as either limiting or extending the legal jurisdiction of Town or County. b. It is not intended by this Intergovernmental Agreement to, and nothing contained in this Intergovernmental Agreement shall be construed to, create any partnership,joint venture or employment relationship between the parties or create any employer- employee relationship between the Town and any County employees, or between the County and any Town employees. Neither party shall be liable for any debts, accounts, obligations nor other liabilities whatsoever of the other, including (without limitation) the other party's obligation to withhold Social Security and income taxes for itself or any of its employees. 21. Effective Date; Term. This Intergovernmental Agreement shall be effective on the date it is recorded with the Pima County Recorder and shall remain in effect until June 30, 2005, unless terminated by either party. 22. Termination. a. Termination for Convenience. Either Party may, at any time and without cause, cancel this Agreement by providing 30 days written notice to the other Party of intent to cancel. b. Termination for Cause. If, in the judgment of either party to this Agreement, the other party does not perform in accordance with the conditions of this Agreement, or is otherwise in default of any provision of this Agreement, the party claiming non- performance or default shall give written notice to the other party specifying the nature of the non-performance or default. If the non-performance or default is not corrected within 30 days after receipt of such written notice, or if the non-performing or defaulting party fails to diligently pursue remedies for corrections which require more than 30 days to complete, the party claiming non-performance or default may terminate this Agreement. c. A.R.S. §38-511. This Intergovernmental Agreement is subject to the provisions of A.R.S. § 38-511. d. Non-Appropriation. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated if, for any reason, the Pima County Board of Supervisors 5 or the Oro Valley Town Council does not appropriate sufficient monies for the purpose of maintaining this Agreement. e. Obligations after Termination. In the event of termination, the Parties shall have no further obligation other than for payment for services rendered prior to termination. In Witness Whereof, County has caused this Intergovernmental Agreement to be executed by the Chairman of its Board of Supervisors, upon resolution of the Board and attested to by the Clerk of the Board and the Town has caused this Intergovernmental Agreement to be executed by the Mayor upon resolution of the Mayor and Council and attested to by its Clerk. ATTEST: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Kathy Cuvelier Mayor Town Clerk Town of Oro Valley ATTEST: PIMA COUNTY Lori Godoshian Sharon Bronson, Chair Clerk of the Board Board of Supervisors 6 Intergovernmental Agreement Determination The foregoing Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952 by the undersigned, who have determined that it is in proper form and is within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to those parties to the Intergovernmental Agreement represented by the undersigned. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: Town Attorney PIMA COUNT Deputy County A torney r TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: David Ronquillo, Planner Technician SUBJECT: OV12-00-06 PUBLIC ART PROPOSED FOR THE GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION, AT RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 PARECEL I, LOCATED ON WOODBURNE AVE. BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: Matthew Moutafis of Sagebrush Design requests Town Council approval for the public art proposed at the Golder Ranch Fire Station located at 12125 N. Woodburne Ave. in Rancho Vistoso. The building will consist of 6,900 square feet, including the building pad and garage area. The groundbreaking for construction is proposed to be in the near future. Per Sec. 4-504F of the OVZCR, all new commercial related projects shall contribute 1% of the project cost towardsp ublic art. The need for public art was established in the Development Plan, which was approved by the Town Council on May 17, 2000. The Public Art Review Committee (PARC) reviewed and approved the proposed public art on November 10, 2000, and an approval letter is attached. iatthew Moutafis has been selected as the contracting artist for the fire station. The proposal agreement between the artist and developer was signed on September 15, 2000. The finished mosaic panels should be completed by March 15, 2001. PUBLIC ART PROPOSAL: The Oro Valley Public Art Review Committee and the applicant have agreed to a mosaic art display for the Golder Ranch fire station. The mosaics will include symbols and elements unique to fire fighting tools and paraphernalia. The artwork will be located outside the front entranceway, so all visitors will be able to view the artwork mounted on a wall facing Woodburne Ave. There will be four mosaic panels, each 3 feet x 3 feet in size. They will be anchored into a masonry wall adjacent to the front entrance of the fire station. Each will consist of a Venician glass tile, individual tiles are % inch x % inch and other cut pieces. There will be approximately 10,000 tiles used on all four-mosaic panels. The mosaic will include a full color range (including gold metallic and silver toned tile) with standard grout and a protective finish coating. These tiles will be contained within a steel frame understructure. The steel understructure and framed edging will be powder painted similar to the exterior accent color of the firehouse. A layout of the proposal has been included and will blend in with the structure and design of the fire station. COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE O 00-19 AMMENDING ARTICLE 4-504F OF OVZCR: The total project cost for the building is approximately $700,000. The total art project proposal will be $8,500, hich exceeds the 1% requirement. Each piece will have an accompanying plaque, which will include the following information as required by OVZCR: Oro Valley Public Art Permanent Collection F:\OV\OV 12\2000\12-00-06\0V12-00-06 RV FIRE public art.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY `COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page2 of 2 NOP Title of the art Name of the artist Date RECOMMENDATION: Thero osed art contribution will enhance the design of the building. Staff recommends approval of the p p proposed Public Art for the Golder Ranch fire station. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to approve OV 12-00-06 Public Art for the Golder Ranch Fire station, with those conditions listed in Exhibit"A", attached herewith. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced Copies of the Proposed Public Art 2. Public Art Review Committee letter of approval PlannillMd Zoning Administrator -1110.-tr>34% Community Development Director Town Manager F F:\OV\OV 12\2000\12-00-06\OV 12-00-06 RV FIRE public art.doc EXHIBIT "A" TOWN COUNCIL CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OV12-00-06 PROPOSAL FOR PUBLIC ART, GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION 1. Per Section 4-504F.4 of the OVZCR, completion and installation of the artwork is required before a Certificate of Occupancy may be issued. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIMIMMIIIININIIIM 11111111 00014.1, .00 inti, Imo'''' `�```411Imi, 00. WO. 44111...fti O. 114114, 100 %iv mmongw-' ....., ..... _ ,... i , . .. EH TOW 2'_8_A.F.F. EEli Li LJ 11 ---11■111111111■■111■ .���:i�i.i� "pV15LIG SAT I N.FLR----- lei( 411-6' if , I'-4" D ` LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 1^4/ LL V/51TE WA51-10101 SCALE 2 3/I6'' MEMORANDUM November 10, 2000 TO: David Ronquillo, Planner Tech FROM: Gigi Miller, Public Art Review Committee SUBJECT: Rancho Vistoso Fire Station The Public Art Review Committee has reviewed and approved the art work for the Rancho Vistoso Fire Station. eie // Gigi Miller David Grigsby Harriet Hough Public Art Review Committee ..• ... '•7 • , . - C 1. C';—1 , ,r .,,.,,„ 74- ,.(.••_,,ze....(1.ii.,) • .... ........__ _ 'lief..II .... L., .!' 1'4'7 '11 i I: -inn:''. '. :::17 md.. i ,r. \-\\\,.--''..--V4 'Vklb... - - ii.-.4.„,-7,5;,:/,': .,, --- --- s , • , ' ''... .\ . ' it',J2 ,'. ' li,„:, ...-,' , -4. '„ i -ts., ‘,,,-, ‘............ ,,, . . i; . .' ---i•••,•,,, , . 4. .. —.t) 1.: ' ''''. F 14 1**i ' ''',--711*- '6 7; 1 i-'':------ 'It•I. ei...---....4''''.-'1' f, •'•'"*.,,,',,, . i'iy , ...& ..... .._ \...., ,NIii: , I ....•. , --- - ' ,Itit . I V _ e•..:' 0 v '. '----40-9*%, . ( ''',-.4 . ,..-- ...-t ,,__. s...... -, - *---.71 •..,- -..,•> ..f(. 7, !, ititrivw• •..1::7-7.-7.--71-- , t, s i, •i....:•tr', -''.7)ji!V-r• '''41."16°1! --..----- ---- -— --••-• t ' ,-)t ••• - •;.• ,,,,,,it,, •. ir k. ‘. ,,,.. * ',P *..-'-:-. ',...„ .•1‘ i, t7• T i! — •• i.1.4 1, ;;;;*!.,.•, -7'..,,-‘1.0. k, ! —•?:::" ,1 4 ,, b,As .t.t.....15 r i•li,'•, 1 1 , :A 4;it".--) r"•4 ii. ' , ,:i..., 4; 4 \ ,,r `I'''!s..4 4,... .e.•.,:t-, _ , ! 4.1 ' .1.4% ,A, 'k•' 'r....--S."';'t • it k It'.i t ... '.... , i t C , . f. f '. . . „..........,.........., --..•-••••••,.trr •••- ••••tw•••-rm. 'It.•"-nw,v4,,„liesi,-,,- 4, : , ; • -47"-1.4.::",--' ' ..‘--- — i ;,'i., •-nolr - .!/4 : . it45"''''''• , .7 ,... ----,..4,_ c • . • ,..4-7-.-\,- e ,.. 4, ',if:. tr,,,, )„,mr......__._. -•„..... '• '.1• p,..........,,_;:„-6...... .„,,,,,„ -',..,',, , ,, . .. .i iii. ,,, ... .. ii...... ,......... ... ...,-.ir,.., 1. '!... t i---:1'1f l' 4 •, ''..,' • ...'qt.'','''' ‘, -\---..•'''r:.-4,,, L itI . , *.? ' ,..-- -1;r.......101.::'•'-_-:aftiiiiirc..4...te- • •• ' ; C )•• !'• i . t • *'. . . •• . . . . . .., .. ,......... . -...1111,W.,Iltr.11.1..., 111111r,yr 4,••,re...,,...1 r : r;ip,,,-4••.'•• 1 ti-• t Sf '- s'J.'''4\*Lillr, I ' • f , - r r •—' . , '_i l't,1,17C.,:%17,;.•:1 It-- \-4.....s 4-- *4 ••-..- ,v_' .— ..4-....t 4 4 frairfi fil;11.7..-- ,. 1 ,.....(i . ..,. .. , ....---.....,...,,r,,,.. ,lk",,' . •r - i .. i iti . -.pair., ''''' . ,.-:-.,_-1 • ,..,.-. ' t „ -.-..,,-.ir-•ror........•,... ,i,,, , *,'`,1,' ;ill •-• ..;,-,A.tis '' •'.4 1; w. . _pir•tver• ,. C & ili. . ,, • 1 ;* •.• , TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Ainsley Anne Reeder Parks and Recreation Administrator SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Utility Tractor with Backhoe,Loader, and 3-Point Finish Mower SUMMARY: The 00-01 capital budget for the Parks and Recreation Division includes $24,000 for the purchase of a utility tractor with backhoe, loader, and 3-point finish mower. This funding was rolled over from the FY99-00 budget year. In September 2000, bid packages were distributed to six vendors in Southern Arizona. On October 6, 2000, one bid was accepted from Burris-White Machinery, Inc. for $26,088.30. As the budget for this item was developed over 18 months ago, this bid is in line with current prices and not considered excessive. The additional $2,088.30 needed to purchase the tractor is available from dollars saved in the line allocated for field supplies. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that $2,088.30 from the Field Supplies (01.192.644) be combined with the $24,000 from the capital budget to purchase a four wheel drive compact utility tractor, with backhoe, loader, and 3-point finish mower. FISCAL IMPACT: $26,088.30 SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve the award the bid to Burris-White Machinery, Inc. for the purchase of a four wheel drive compact utility tractor, with backhoe, loader, an 3-point finish mower utilizing $24,000 from the capital budget and $2,088.30 from the field supplies budget. OR I move to reject the bid from Burris-White Machinery, Inc. for the purchase of a four wheel drive compact utility tractor, with backhoe, loader, and 3-point finish mower. 4 Attachments: 1. Minutes from October 6, 2000 Bid Opening Parks and Recr� e ion Administrator De a ent Heat Town Man.ger TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PARK AND RECREATION PROJECT NO. OV-CD-2000-904-01 FOUR WHEEL DRIVE COMPACT UTILITY TRACTOR, WITH BACKHOE, LOADER, AND 3-POINT FINISH MOWER OCTOBER 6, 2000 CALL TO ORDER: 2.05 p.m. PRESENT: Ainsley Reeder, Park and Recreation Administrator Linda Hersha, Secretary II The following bids were submitted: Name Address Phone Bidder's Bidder's Bidder's Bid Proposal Proposal Proposal Amount Form#1 Form#2 Form#3 (520)BurrsWhite 2020WestYes Yes Yes $26,088.30 Machinery, Inc. Gardner Lane 887-1211 Tucson, AZ 85705 Respectfully submitted, //--4 • z, Aff taidire / 4 Linda Hersha, Administrative Secretary TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 [0: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Ainsley Anne Reeder Parks and Recreation Administrator SUBJECT: Consideration of an In-Line Skating Event—Cactus Speed Classic SUMMARY: On 19, 2000, Ms. Diana M. Coonce, Cactus Speed Classic Race Director, made a presentation to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board regarding the possibility of hosting an in-line skating event in Oro Valley. Currently the Cactus Speed Classic Marathon & Half Marathon are held in Sahuarita. Ms. Coonce stated that the Tucson In-Line Sk8 Club is looking for a more central location for the event. She believes that this event, which is the only in-line marathon in Arizona, will provide positive exposure for Oro Valley, not only locally, but nationally, as this event draws skaters from all over the United states. Regarding the resources that would be expected from the Town, Ms. Coonce stated the Club is flexible in their request for support. However, she anticipated that the Town's contribution would be in-kind assistance from the Parks and Recreation Division, the Public Works Department, and/or the Police Department. If the Town wishes to pursue hosting the Cactus Speed Classic, Ms. Coonce requests a meeting with the appropriate Town officials to solidify the details of the Town's participation. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board voted unanimously to recommend to the Council that the Town love forward with sponsorship of the Cactus Speed Classic V Marathon & Half-marathon in Oro Valley in November 2001. The Board further recommended that Town Council set conditions for the race, including budget, insurance, and course layout. Attached you will find a packet outlining the event in detail. Ms. Coonce will be available at the December 6, 2000 Town Council Meeting to answer questions or provide additional information. FISCAL IMPACT: The Town is not obligating direct dollars for this event, but would be committing in-kind assistance. Although the direct impact is not know at this time, the Town Manager and Department Heads would have to approve the commitment of people and resources. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Cactus Speed Classic V Marathon & Half-marathon be sponsored in Oro Valley in November 2001. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: nove to approve sponsorship of the Cactus Speed Classic V in Oro Valley on November 4, 2001. OR I move to reject the sponsorship of the Cactus Speed Classic V in Oro Valley on November 4, 2001. Attachments: 1) Minutes of OV Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting for October 19, 2000 2) Cactus Speed Classic V Information Packet C3-2-%.--Q. C3-- -R79--a-t Parks and e�tio Administrator itAl r Department Head 0/4444e Town Manager • The Tucson In-Line Sk8 Club andFast Eddie's Skate SchdooIpresent the C t s Classic IV Sunday, 5, 2000 Marathon fa Half Skate Tucson's Cactus �� ./ 4,,,Benefits Pima � `��`�� Speed Classic \,..,,,, i, Community College . has been voted gym Foundation : Arizona's Best ,,,./ ScholarshipFund and . ' In-Line Skate the Tohono O'odham e't # 1 , Race in The Best Community College i' !!! :1a of S THEA T Three .. ' ' ` Row!, '1 ; 4 0 Years in a ,I . ' '' I) ,): . - , ) ' ' - . .' .,1,1,- -.1P - 4.,, ; . . .. _ ,,_ HIP • . Ai.• z Vit*'- <<1 , `' • Custom trophies for top 3 overall males & females • Cashurse for top3 males & females in Full Marathon p • Awards for Age Groups (520)744-3787 • $5000+ in raffle prizes (520)722-4044 • Food and T-shirts for all www•pima.edu/' CactusIV participants MILLER,ALLEN&CO.,P.C. ToBAcco.FREE Certified Public Accountants - Lovitt Touche Tott4 BI�IC�O�S -- ›J � '- ,*�7 i Q ` BlueShield nsurance of Arizona itteCeassigmaid"4fe g°' DflhTAtJTO I'>;)!.s,„ mow iiitiewil,_„..- i. PLAY IT AEWIII1 ..., — .„, Desert Refrigeration Aino .—. ' 41- ':- ' .121'' CO 8au 14 CCARM4;YICATIONS ��+ii-...-—�✓,v,�, g� pii_taot Eddy iatzgerWorkshop 1.04 ear lii;; ,,,40-7 i-'47:, w111 TRIM 514478- kr;..►r4"A.mv� .'"'""" mCILIF 77 k. �.Carer.,J, KCEE " /Q► .re► C i JV O. s . ��,cson www.bwats�c,.tcs ro'ni OAkilCNC. 9344X TRADER JOE'S li'e .i1M111 TICHS Today*Bart Mae tc-Aq4 5 1 4*. '' 'ee ' .„,„i 2W, ri-is_H-1 vtz,.--:if A gRIIEGGmikEL P'31JI A' Abirtsont' Te..k .M.rd..f rker na rtiArt Ode menitora ••�•trb TvZo Letirttii (8I iapun Ji) ainp u2is uuip.zung/lua.zed owa oirtwu is s‘aloft y •alge.zajsus.0-uou ate s.taquunu aos.t pus amspunJaa-uou s!an Xama alp Ism pusls.tapun osis I•suogot.usai asp idaoos I pus Xlt -must uMo ICtu pums.tapun clln.I pus peat anus'I Imp anpalrnouvs I pus Juana sul2.toj 2un000s swam iuud Jo qaM`2ssoala2 Issopso.tq Xus ut a.tmotd pus assists/Cts JO asn aa.0 asp.toJ uotssn.uuad Cut°As?1 uuoJ sup nno nuq p III•ioloop lotpauu pasuaotl s Xq pagt.tan uaaq ssq uogipuoo Isotsicgd 1Ctu 3sgp pus lump sips jo uogalduuoo aq1 ioj pauts.0 Xllttasoguns anal pus 2g XllsotsiCgd sus I lsga`3uatudtnba angoaloid pus 2atulaq TIgNS/ISNV uE.150M WM I`2UE.uua Jowls autl-ut tre sE 2UOA3 stip ut alsdtowsd Wm 11s111 Isom j•sagtngoe polypi Xus pus 2uana nut2s?ls autl-ut stip ut 2Jsd 2ut?Is2 jo linsa.t s ss out icq pa.zajjns saunfut Its pus Aus loj su2isss pus`s.zossaoons`santlsluasatdat`slosuods Hs pus Xus pus IEsuatuuuanon Ile pus/Cus`gni3 pis autl-ui uoson j`s2usngss Jo umoJ `stostnJadns Jo pisog X2unoJ sung`,Class otjgnd Jo IuatuiisdaQ suozuy`uogspodsus.tj jo 2uatu2..lsdaU suozuy`suoz -sly jo alms asp Jsutsns aAsq/Csuu j stua2t Isuos.tad.tagno,Cur.to'salmis autl-tit/Ctu Jo ssol atl2'02 pajiunl lou lnq`Butpnioui`so stusp.[oj suttsjo pus sjgnu lis pus Xus anIEM'um -s.ustuttups pus stojnoaxa ctu'sisal!Asu`Jlas/Cuu.to3` galati`punoq clls2al aq 02 nuipua3ut`pau2istapun asp`j`2uatuaato5 stgS 2utuats Au jo uouslaptsuoo ttI:tuuod.tant5M 2uang quD gys aujj-uj uosanj of a/grnCnd saaf!iv•spunia.r ou£1ajnjosgv $ :(pasopua junoiut 1tlo3)saaa rIXX lx 7 1AI :azis w. qs-j -:awls uotpuitysi J[t J :04.C1s UOL EIEW :s.zaauzanoN (Juana alupdoJddI lamp aseaici) :Juana :ssaJppu'Irma :diZ :owls :SIT J :ssoippy :Aup aa1-a uo any :d/IN :auoud :(1uud asuajd)auxiN • °I tL58 ZV `uosan f "1,4 sfI H SuunS 'Act 068£ `gnla 81S au!I-uI uosanl :ol saaj alinidoiddi qmm,uwioj stall puss 'sluana S iaquWanom aqp ioj iajsi2ai off, IARIOd A I1MI sire .._ ,.._ tcl IS, Min M • l Y ° l V CA • , • / Y� i ia N ' ep ep t_i tt u' g fir0 t- . -,'' '' • .Ti MIrD ~ a 7 Ir .- . . .- ::--, 0-3 �. t`''EMI M1 - :4- LA �, o' o' a ~• Ro o ,- a, ' ► ,. immi :,' ;:,,, ..--i. Q.,,,f- z4.- E a Co...inOP: Ph: `.< A: 005' . .. t-' ;=,'. 8 E'', %41 g L 1 l '' -0 izt -, p.,:l ,__, up c„4.) .0 0 (-) CI . , ,..s. t..1 0 Ft; CD 1:1) .0 CD '..) p-, CD CD © ,,,, o sp h4 Cr 01 g crq = P '•< •• ;i- --'•cm, P ra 0) " > lk D,. � ` _ .i. t 0 o (1 I `\' 10 ® F• �' 7' to LO Ai ' Z) �I. : 0 ,c1 :i ' E 0 . ,,_ y CD tpt. lk n , - z rt ca. ft re FE CD i i t)) 8- trs: r4 ) (ssa C -h-) at 4 . - z • h ; 1 k g /46 § F, ..- . car :< .. l ' 'Ir a, piiiittl rs V) ti ..a•-.1:--,.' - t'll . .-, ,.., , rt, i.-.3 ,,, 1...1 c., tv ,-... .... ,1..,. crocl -- Nr... vi 1�� A A co p' �, \o \o �o �, 111 Dl 14411 lot ;_,:,,,,,e4 I d 1.411 cdt4 a:1 : , **.-q" 0-3 n .., r, ..,. ' e ,. 4,N. no 40 = A: -. zo ;4 '''' ‘V; : 0 0 • itsI*3‘- ',.'.' - I?. ,-. ci) © (-, - D',. 4' '> 0 . x0 FgA, c0 c0 O O — (� CD 5:it S. rtilt° ". A r Cy.ev :: ,.. o cep a, ' ' O P O 2, v1 O r0 Ca' ,., Z 41"S\ ,t,a 7: 8""'' 1- ; �-* Uq a (...v. Po N, ,,s. ,..s.: tw e-+ , I:) „,,,,,ini Pitt F )0 O \.t t0 O �' 1 I II II) 0 M C O '� O , r%N -. a' Z a A ”'Ili -4 '4 - 5.,-. CSD r, • O )x X nall, (.-.-. .....\\, t.7.1 ...Al c -,-,-. ,.. Q ,, 'Its "4.t nairs I..- CD pc, 49,7 ‘s: a \ICU/ 't: *.....4 M Z .4. ' IN .4:1 rt, Z. ,-, Ittl:I 11 UTh !T! Z 4.4- AD O. co Z� .., oS SE a t tall N *ii (CD C) g .:•' .:.114-***• ' -,''-_ . g '41i;'$0. *-04 . 4.1 o § 1,- ' 1i ��c (-- 4.- ., a O O C Co 41111€4 N,--- -,-- -----,,,, ,i "; . ...Ate .*• Gp* * *a0 O n tria ���4�, 4bp WdY. (0 coXI" ►�` a+ `� <1 , k ,,,4 i.....-.. NI ',.-:: , v , ft. d NI .10iplii„. lit LLJ kilt '. ., , % O 4) VVI Ai ':',.. lk L. evNI ILI h'i � pl-rM V Lk, Ok k '' PO' L.) - Z40 raa • • LLI tip. _ .. �� W � ,.,,, ..,... ✓`,� «sw... >... � .,o....,,..�.-,_,. •ET�i�� izcl ® �/ •� = � � � Mai ., uN 7 e., ki c) iF .‘;' .. W arrg frA . C ,„ -'': _,4 k ,,,,T,,, LL Lt. I, -..... .•§. z ci ar cl , ~tt ,.) .. 4Fil,Illiasil Z . . Wti) 4,1 v) °4 % z - lia \.* fife'trairilliiii LU .4, - i ;. Qo ,u h. O V) N 4-° ! Cle /:$ g.-2 a < - , ....... 1.---. ''''''':::77-- '1111,_,_';'""j'N'n""a""Wir'',._._, ,„„ „ ' -'i'..1 o ° a P -� ,zki c=J - iii.L. t',5 0 z,-. V; 1 r- ..... .. — '44)4 ilcii) I E.., .„Lt• mosi ;rilei c a3 � ° */ *Jai " -'*‘i k Nt Li .., E.., = CA M —1 ',4 , „..„ %kJ `4; ki Cc ..1 ........ tollo 1 vesb.,. ....1 .ts 1 ,, 8.. 4. cc,,,,. - .1 1 --4 -44 cii .viiiiiie ,...... Tz, Olf..‘.1N.,Z* 2 ...-,., 1,-,-__---...-.. ,4 kr) ii.‘ 1 ',) ir..4 oca 4v ,,, ki ti) `‘) i R A.‘ 4 cz) a, l s ---4,,,, , e,:, '';, 4,4 =amL''''',.,--. ,...• 10,,,',. y ' fa -,,,l i th....,ar-- 1 & i '}+ H 6 CZ',ity. .....)10,....:H„, ', \ .....r1,,,„, 4.0 La. 6.1 -Zt C.7 ,4 owumeri IVW if 1 4 4 ; 1 , x-,,,, ,, (i) S. k:3.4 Ille t ,p a OIL, ,..2 :' '', "7--t' 0 t :''. P. ~ O N ICCS - 1,...). a p—, 5 ,...., ,..,: 0 i..) 1 (11)%':" ali ., , ›- ,.., cti — .. - ;.1.1 '� 0 CD C` L m . r-+ a !,..L„,.... ,,cu is% 'z „D wc) �) c...) ,4 . . . ,.3 ,, 4,4 4,J .4. c4 .'illf- °L) a 0/2 ii1ii i ti.: I, cu C.10 ‘11, r—I, rli 1 .= ,c) :E 3. cip . A Cap 2 ei 644 _41_ 40c.) 1:1 a,ct ;.., 4- (1 V.-\\ ' ZO a 1144 an cn ,,..„ 0 ) ca)w 4) . 0 ' -''' ;4':, ° 0) ' .- likirlii 141 14(1:>; i�• Ii ..g, •'T11 (I) C.)'t ir— it rc, gii. 4 ct .„„ , ` k,„1 :____. , , :,.„.. ,. . . st, t v 4c� r Oro Valley Town Council Meeting December 6, 2000 Topic: Cactus Speed Classic V, Marathon & Half-marathon In-line Skating Event, November 4, 2001 • History • Awards • Application • Pre-event Articles and Web Site • Advertising, Written, Radio and Television • Race Day and Post-event Articles • Request to the Mayor with Budget • Next Step SWEAT 1/4 The Tucson In-Line 5k8 Club & Fast Eddie's Skate School present I t Tucson Cactus Speed Classic IV Sunday November 5, 2000 Marathon & Half-Marathon Skates 0,„ I Voted Arizona's Best In-Line Skate Event three years in a roof •Custom trophies for top 3 overall males&females Register online at •Awards for Age Groups Active.com •Cash purse for top 3 males&females in Full Marathon •$5000+in raffle prizes •Food! •T-shirts! •Cactus! •Sun! •Free Verducci racing skates to the top money raiser! • http://www.pima.edui-CactusIV (520)744-3787 or (520)722-4044 ANEMIIIV email dmcoonceyahoo.com Benefits Pima Community College&Tohono Uodham Community College BlueCross TBACCO-FREE WAYS vo, BlueShield of Arizona ' 444;2:10-3- *-4C10"t tX:71. Lovitt&Touché MILLER,ALLEN&CO.,P.C. Aff144 insurance CatifilhblicAmstand Coxco * Desert Auto*Desert Diamond Casino* Play It Again Sports* Sierra Springs Albertson's*Apex Hardbody Nutrients*Bauer USA*Bones Bearings* Breugger's*ClifBar* Designs by Diana*Eddy Matzger Workshop*Explore Wheels*Jamba Juice*Jim Click**KMSB&KTTU*KRQ&KNST*O'odham Printing*PCC Foundation*Polar Sports*Salomon Skates*SWAT Skates* SWEAT Magazine*Tohono O'odham Executive Branch*Trader Joe's* TV Zona* Verducci" WB*Wild Oats Cactus II wysiwyg://2/http://MAX.DCO.PIMA.EDU/-cactusir The Tucson In-Line 5K8 Club and t Fast Eddie's Skate School present the (// Cactus Speed Classic IV Irk s .i Sunday, November 5, 2000 (as always, the first Sunday in November) I I , � _ g Results are here! irrw-4 ske Registration starts 6 a.m. Events start at 7 a.m. L I :„ ' : This year's Marathon route will be the same as Cactus III, a sin le 9 The Cactus Speed Classic has been Voted loop starting in Sahuarita, AZ 'Best InLine Skate Race'in Arizona in The (south of Tucson on 1-19) Best of SWEA TMagazine '98, '99 AND again in 2000/ Marathon Skate Half-Marathon Skate What's New Entry Form Motel Info To benefit the Pima Community College Foundation Scholarship Fund and the Tohono Cr odham Maps Community College Scholarship Fund Join us in beautiful Tucson, Arizona, for the fourth Cactus Speed ClassicSta tuned to http://www.pinva.edui—cactusIV Custom Designed Trophies Cash purse ffitfi .1111.1100 Awards for Age Groups Free Verducci skates for top money-raiser More than $5000 in raffle prizes! Food, beverages and T-shirts for all participants 1 of 2 11/16/2000 10:17 PM News&Gossip http://MAX.DCO.PIMA.EDUk-cactusiv/Stuff.html • 4 \ I ;,i. II v , ill "You're Doing It AGAIN," pro 440 _ 11$1 . I News, Gossip, Links & Stuff 1 1 1 ' 1'1 if ' (Some of which may be boring.) / 1, (This page will be updated frequently with the latest 1.44 •... '-. ' information,changes,etc.) 11/04 4 ow- i 4ip .... , 4-, 1 :A ...,..,-.- ',... . •_,-- ,0 r- . •. - - ...-'--;7 Reminder:Packet pickup and registration Saturday from 10 to 4 at Play-It-Again Sports,Oracle&LimberlosL(See below) Weather:More showers were expected Saturday afternoon and evening,but there's only a slight chance for a shower race morning as the current weather moves off to the east.Pre-dawn temps should be in the mid 40s,rising into the 60s during the day.Rain or shine,we skate! The course was cleaned up Thursday and should be in good shape unless we get heavy rains,which is not in the forecast. Got folks coming from all over again.In past years we've had 13 states plus the Netherlands represented.This year we've got at least one person coming down from Canada and one from Switzerland,plus a lot of folks you know from the US. ,......_ _......... 1The Bottom Line: (Well, OK, it's really the top line but you know what we mean.) The Half Marathon is a really fun experience for the rec skater, with a long, straight smooth downhill, followed by some"normal" street skating, followed by an uphill stretch to the finish line which will make you know you've accomplished something. The Full Marathon is a challenging experience for the serious skater with some rough pavement and hills, a couple of railroad tracks, followed by the same "nice" second half described above. tl thought you weren't gonna do this route again? Well, we actually said we weren't gonna do this route again unless they repaved Mission Road. To our surprise they did resurface Mission Road. It's still rough. 'Update: A group of skaters did the Mission Road segment of the full marathon recently. Their verdict: 50% to 100% better(smoother)than last year.(This is the stretch of road that Chad Hedrick I, eferred to as "13 miles of cobblestones" last year. He loved it!)(It was really only 7 miles of rcobblestones ) What did skaters think about this route last year? 1 of 4 11/13/2000 7:38 AM News&Gossip http://MAX.DCO.PIMA.EDU/-cactusiv/Stuff.html , One of the real reasons we're doing this again is quotes like these: [ . . . ]The course was exhilarating and challenging. I'm still feeling like I'm' climbing the last hill. The sound of the pavement rattling under our wheels sent a chill for a moment. I'm still trying to figure out if it was two layers ': of pavement or if it was the earth beneath the pavement. What was that rumbling noise? [. . . ]We will absolutely be back next year. f. [. . . ]Thanks for everything. Your hard work really showed us a great, safe skate. f [ . . . ] Thank you for a grea race. [. . . ] You guys really know how. to. put on ce [ . . . ] I was in the Cactus Speed Classic last weekend and will be the firstto' say it was more challenging than even your web sit ;warned (in my opinion!) r 1. you. . . ] han : a g ain fora a great event. We truly enjoyed the day. . . . Just wanted to tellyou how much we enjoyed our first Cactus Classic. [ ] You guys know how to put on a race! Everyone was very helpful and friendly. [ . . . ] The raffle was like Christmas in November! WOW! Thanks again for all the hard work and hours you folks put in to this race. See you next time! I can't say you didn't warn us, but in my opinion the marathon course was extremely difficult for us "recreational" skaters, even ones like myself who RUN marathons but haven't skated more than a 10K distance "competitively" . I tried to enjoy the experience, but can't saythat I'll be back next year. I J Y P � didn't mind the hills or even the railroad tracks, but the road surface was just horrible in many places and simply wasn't fun. Just wanted to thank you for a great race. Your event is truly one of the i highlights of the season and something I always look forward to. This was my third "cactus" and I'll be coming back. Last years course wasn't bad but this course was outstanding. I would like to see you use the same course next year. One of the safest and most organized races of this season. I can tell how you guys are really paying attention to all the details which a racer really appreciates. I am a former Olympic downhill skier on the Swedish National Team and use to travel the world racing the World Cup events so I always have high expectations of the organizers and you truly haven't disappointed me. Overall, everyone thought the event was great! And they really liked the course, especially that nice long down-hill on Helmet Peak. People even inquired as to whether we'd hold IV there? Remember our concern: they were either going to "love us" or "hate us" . . . .well, they loved us! ...so we'll be happy to get your comments after this year's race. We're already in negotiations for a different route next year, one closer to town, but we'll see. We want to emphasize, as we did last year, that the Full Marathon is not a route for the casual rec skater 2 of 4 11/13/2000 7:34 AM News&Gossip http://MAX.DCO.PIMA.EDU/---cactusiv/Stuff.html A r who wants to go out and coast around for 26 miles. They won't have fun. If you're a semi-serious skater who can deal with rough pavement and hills and just want to do the Marathon without pushing you'll !probably do ok. ii:Ve get Questions... Packet pickup is being held the day before the race, Saturday,November 4, from 10 am 'til 4 pm, at Play Lit Again Sports at North Oracle&Limberlost(Oracle is a major street running roughly parallel to I-10. est way is probably the Prince Road exit east to Oracle and then North to Limberlost, southeast corner lof intersection.)No, you don't have to pick up your stuff the day before,you can get it race morning. a Registration starts at 6 am Sunday,the Full Marathon starts at 7 am. Half-marathoners should be at the start before 7. They will be bussed to the start of the Half-Marathon; there will be absolutely no parking available at the start location on Mission Road, if you're bringing your own cheerleaders Mission & iflelmet Peak would be the firstp ood spot for them. g Special note for local skaters and others who might be checking out the route: Park Corporation&the road from La Canada are private property(and a sign is posted near the entrance).Their Security folks get nervous when folks go driving&skating up to their building.The road is just nice smooth surface up the hill with a turn to the left to their building and parking lot where the race will start and finish.So if you want to check out the route,just stick to the public road portion. Questions LS'afety We get questions... 1There will be food and water at all aid stations, which will be about every five miles. EMTs (Emergency Medical Technicians) will be at the aid stations for medical assistance if needed. radio operators will be on the course for communication assistance. Skate mechanics will be on the route with equipment for minor repairs (wheels, bearings, etc.). olunteers will be posted at potential trouble spots. Sahuarita Police and Pima County Sheriffs Department will be providing traffic control, plus the Southwest Rangers will lead the event and bring up the rear, for traffic control and safety Scenery Collectors'Alert! IIn case you missed last year's event you've got a whole new set of scenery to look at: instead of desert land nearby mountains, you've got desert and nearby mine tailings. Beautifully landscaped mine tailings. !Open pit mines. Hillsides full of cows! The seldom-seen Sahuarita Landfill. Railroad tracks! !jackrabbits! And --yes!--more. 1 A little information on Sahuarita is here and a little more in Adobe Acrobat format here. (Of course all this is just an excuse for our Annual Museum Tour: I. Most people had to drive past the Pima Air Museum to get to the Cactus I site. II. In Cactus II skaters skated within a couple of miles of the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum. (Tucson's top tourist attraction--plan to spend most of the day.) M. Last year and this year you skate past the entrance to the Titan Missile Museum.) 3 of 4 11/13/2000 7:34 AM The following list of motels is provided for your convenience http://MAX.DCO.PIMA.EDU/—cactusiv/motels.html / stir /1/1 ` L `•. ",�:ti's,:r I` I I I i I Motel Info 4, 1. I NEW! Cactus Speed Classic Rates! . . SPECIAL!! Ask for the "Cactus Speed Classic Rate" at these four motels: Airport Locations: Best Western Inn at the Airport / 7060 5. Tucson Blvd 520-746-0271 / 1-800-772-3847 rates: $52/night dbl rrn w/ 2 beds comp breakfast buffet late check out okay free shuttle w/ in 5 mi radius discount restaurant rates discount massage rates Holiday Inn Express / 2803 E. Valencia Rd 520-294-2500 / 1-800-864-2145 rates: $52/night dbl rm w/ 2 beds comp breakfast buffet late check out okay free shuttle w/ in 5 mi radius discount restaurant rates discount massage rates Green Valley Locations: Best Western, Green Valley / I-19 exit no: 65, on LaCanada 520-625-2250 / 1-800-344-1441 rates: $69/night dbl rm w/ 2 beds late check out okay 1 of 3 11/13/2000 7:10 AM The following list of motels is provided for your convenience http:!/MAX.DCO.PIMA.EDU/—cactusiv/mote(s.html free full breakfast buffet Holiday Inn Express, Green Valley / I-19 exit no: 65, on LaCanada 520-625-0900 rates: $65/night dbl rm w/ 2 beds late check out okay free full breakfast buffet must make reservations by Oct 28th to get rate. micro waves & mini fridge in rooms The following list of motels is provided for your convenience. We have no firsthand experience with any of them. The Airport motels are those within about a mile of the airport. Note: the information below is essentially the same as last year's. There may be newer motels near the airport or in Green Valley/Sahuaritn that we haven't discovered yet. The actual closest motel is at the Duval Mine Exit 69, a new-last-year Holiday Inn Express [(520) 625-0900], just over three miles from the race start. (See Route to Race map.) The Duval Exit is approximately 20 miles/18 minutes from I-10, and is sort of on the northern edge of Green Valley. There's also a Best Western in Green Valley [(520) 625-2250]. (See above for special Cactus Speed Classic Rates at these two motels.) Please note that Green Valley is a retirement community, so if you're into partying before the event (afterward? you've got to be kidding) you'll probably want to drive in to Tucson. (See Locator Map.) To the north the closest motels are probably the Airport ones, but you're a ways off the freeway. When you get back on I-10 there are lots of locations to the west (north) at 22nd, Broadway, Speedway, etc.; to the east there are fewer, but several new ones have been going up. (By the way, from I-10, Speedway east will get you to the U of A; Broadway east will take you to Reid Park, which has a nice perimeter skating route.) Airport motels: (there may be others) • Best Western Inn at the Airport 7060 5. Tucson Blvd. (520) 746-0271 / 2 of 3 11/13/2000 7:10 AM The following list of motels is provided for your convenience http:!/MAX.DCO.PIMA.EDU/---cactusiv/motels_html 1-800-772-3847 (See above for special Cactus Speed Classic Rates at this motel.) • Clarion Hotel 6801 5. Tucson Blvd. (520) 746-3932 / 1-800-526-0550 • Courtyard I Marriott 2505 East Executive Drive (520) 573-0000 / 1-800-321-2211 • Embassy Suites 7051 5. Tucson Blvd. (520) 573-0700 / 1-800-262-8866 • Hampton Inn 6971 5. Tucson Blvd (520) 889-5789 / 1-800-HAMPTON • Holiday Inn Express 2803 East Valencia Road (520) 294-2500 / 1-800-864-2145 (See above for special Cactus Speed Classic Rates at this motel.) • La Quinta Inn & Suites 7001 5. Tucson Blvd. (520) 573-3333 / 1-800-531-5900 • Sumner Suites 6885 5. Tucson Blvd. (520) 295-0405 / 1-800-74-SUITE Home Entry Form Maps I News& Stuff 3 of 3 11/13/2000 7:10 AM yA.juy. S - " 1 f S 0 ... 1 :: f:, ' -,71,7-7;:.''`'..-::;;;;I'''- 0 as sit a',,ang kiC, . .,.-:'.':-'-,,..-. 111) M0.:- :, -.} 1','''';',,'.:',','-','2,:;..,72'::?''''''''"~vY- r1 h� eu Y ?. ,f4' '::''''..':-...,:,,. -,-.I CI) ._.,,.. , n_ ,i,..0,,,, i `r • ;- h ^ a.w"fe .1:..,,,, , -- rillia „„..,,,,. -, ;:::-....'::,.',,-,-.., ,,,----',12,--r_.,,,..,-,---' .t ,*..,9t,,,.-::-,I,:-..::.:...,,.,.- �f K y ,,. - C::: ' .--,...,,,. ..t: . ,-,. - .•.; . .. ,. , , , ....,,,A*;', � ._ itil) Tom•! i .... 1111Z:$ 7: , .,:_.::,,,,, .. ;�,.,„,,,',„:„.„.,,,-.,,,,,41, a.ya4*�. 3 VR ,,,'` } tip *+r�. a) cl) v,,,,,..„,,,„:„.„..„_ ..,,,..„.„,..._,,..„,:::,,,,,,.;.vr....,::.,,,,,;„;. .,.., !.,,._,,,,:„ ; 1 :,,,.,.._,„.„.,.:.„,„.„,:,,,,,,,._,_,,_,‘__.:„,,,, _,.:_f.::_„.,...... .,„Alc.,:,. 4100'--- - Ciltum ,a.„..,1.4i.'0,'-, ''.....-., ... ",-,..4.._ ,,.--;'-.-.:,:,...:: --.:-,-::-.— , ..._:),e' -1. ;Irk ,,,. T .,, _. .'_,�" a. t• .--':'''''' M� (111)y $31) —- -; * # .. rt (in_,_, ,,1„.,tk, ::.. .,. Cli). _me .i- -.::‘ - ' ann9: Iwk 0 amanss ...„::::.,,..-i-,:----...,;-:.-- ... . . ....,......._.:_...,......,:...,,..._ _., z... _ 3- "tU t3 , .. . , aIrnize. . .... . ._. .„ 2 < 3;�` to ':' TY0* 1-15 /T) gil -..--,:'.' .1,;',4„.-.4jr,...L__ - fx) t i'" i§h °-*IP .� 0, cam' 0 'w = .",- „,----771.!---- - .ate YN:.�^ :, .40-V,,,,,,„ -!'0 t . : ...0 __•,. 3:— 5=11-.4:-A * it LRA,;,,,,--,-z ',----• . - * 5 741, (t) 0 g t= 0, - 3 (D mit ;, 1 ars wt �: {�'� '7' 111111+� *ci �$- x 1:::::3:,. Kr./ M � r,-int T .:-.:* 7:!::::: fiL' F, c,)a :::::.•.= Ye � � ;�.✓y� � � �+.mac p C 4:,#.1,,,:-.,, �� t` - . g = i a :v vii,...- ;.::' _ - '�'•• a {' .H.....*,-to a . � ` 1 11, • ..:.,..k. :' .': _ �..�i ... ..,........... mon o�..2m`b`Sf. / ,.':,;-',:',;.',•-;-:',-; .. ......'.:.�............... i..... ,r=;.... Q,.>.,...f-.,..*.mss...:-..,,......-•KF:."a,F,.,--.�.>,..e.�...... na.: �.. r•X, .�. ..L...>:d:-.>..-. t....n. . ,..........:.....,,d ... X _. • ..,.r•-s. .. .._ -�-7t- •�. Vi �,..,':; ..Y W.,.:!':.... a.v o. ,J /s.. _� - �..+-. x � ;r.' ..:x,e, .:s4.-��.� n_-:,,,,,.-......;!...-:� <t`_+.+ "'stt Y !.{'..�•., ..�. �.�..!� .. �. ,.v..-.:- ..........�v. .....i... .-. ._o .:_ va, r, �"Y"' 14.�::Y -yr-.-+: +-4r: !. .f. %� ,F. # .X Rg dv ,. .,.v_: .. .azo _..,. -- ___. - - -- _._r,, - .!,,�c ti•i r.5c.• u�- -�- ++ � / .. .....� .,. .+r*r:.- :�..-..,rr:.� -*. .. .... _. ..:..1`_-s* . '3" .L. 'fir :�6:'�!' •.X,> ......... ........ .. !.-L ... ..:... }r... ...... _ ..-. __L '.:s.,-.. F...-:,..-*..�,-�...,.�sem, - -- - .,.. ..}:::.:::'F'v..r�...,:,--'''''',A:,:'7,:'`�4:: � :......:�.�.r.::...:.:. .''-,,$'350P-4.. ..... !.,.:r !f."i'�f,-/�6 f n R I - ......„. . . ib... :.:,,,,-.-„-- she/I/lib ...„ _, ,,, iri,.................._......._.............._,......... i Pry+be J.K WosVake ,k, , The top three Tucson halfm - arathon nth Chad in the lead,here were about 15 ,; winners(I-r):Michelle Fuentes, of us in a teed pack.A couple of guys and I Geoffrey Hull and Steven Outen4 caught up with Chad goingup Helmet Peak. ; „. It was sort a tag-you're-it but it felt .u. t • 0 good.Then he attacked and on the downhill he was easily doing 40 mph.The pack split .I. Tucson Cactus groups , ,, * into of three or:four. That last. 2- ffi _ . p + hilt demoralized a 1©€of people." - ,. . 7, `^ �{a Julie Brandt-Glass, 22,said she was_ Y .K. I�STLAKE P • leased with the format that allowed her to 4} g - � ;, :. -�.x East minute site change �tQ county parks Ala ;, .2 w� he hungwith the _ , _ department whim took this year's Tucson start with the guys and A '` Inline SK8 Club's third Annual Cactus Speed lead pack for about 8 miles.Dropping back °, � . -. Classic nearly to Mexico.Instead of a smooth to pace herself,the California pro said her 4 •...• f_d ,� � �` R.X: but hill= mulfi a loo the course near only moment of.nervousness came when -- _ she realized she was out in the remote ..:._ t 5ahuarita was rough in places with more ": } challenginghills but also a long downhill desert all alone. stretch for the full and half marathons. "I saw a pair of Verducci's[her spori- s,'; ,�,,a, - wring skate company] up ahead on Craig Disappointment over Jay Etheridge's. • Garcia so I caught upand followed and lead P . one of last years marathon winners, broken • AE ankle was quickly dispelled with the appear- him(finishing one second ahead),"she said. 3. ` ' Both Brandt-Glass and second-place i..t i once of wo -class professional skater Chad Hedrick. 22, Texas. Smoking the field by finisher Penny Wright mentioned the :=� T women's field was missingtopZonie skater f the well-known pro __ _ . ` �, more than two minutes, con- accomplished the feat with two center wheels Nikki Diarnacrtopoutas-Baruch. Much con- } cern was expressed over the Tempe resi- . .. missing from his right skate. y "This was a tough course,"said Hedrick. dents serious training fail two days before .: i,,� 'The last 6 or 7 miles were really difficult;the the Tucson event. . pavement was soft and it was uphill An The half-marathon winner, 14-year-old experienced skater could not have made it up Steven Outen, moved to Arizona from that last ht`ll.' London a few months ago. His parents said . ma" the relocation was partly motivated by the �z" _''� Dianetate recognized the new course need for Outen to be able to train for dis- Race organizers liar 'Bladea o r ogn u -• lance racing.They added that London has an .r would be exceptionally challenging. T'he # "=;-" speed skatingscene but the kind of . .� .. 5f4#1 Club did an excellent job of gettingthe excellent : word out and a number of skaters switched distances possible out here are rare there, !!z , • from the full to the half marathon. Fast Geoffrey Hutt.35.second in the half,is ' Eddie %Vedrter, 33, as usual the first a good example of the Tucson event's wide „,,,9 f <_. AI ���!.` Arizonan across the marathon line, said, spread reputation which brought more than x Z r • ?It �t .�t.......:.. ..... - -. .:............._ �;.. 100 skaters to southern Arizona. The Massachusetts resident heard about the inline race white vacationing in Tahiti. Half Marathon OVERALL WOMEN'S Michelle Fuentes, Phoenix (46:55), Anne Bissell, Tucson.(54:46), Laurel Geske, Wisc. (59:04), Irene O'Brien,Mass.(59.04). OVERALL MEN'S Steven Outen, Ahwatukee (45:02), Geoffrey Hull, Mass. {45:23), Steve Granek, Tucson (53:59). WOMEN'S AGE GROUP WINNERS 20-29 Michelle Fuentes (46:55), 30-39 Irene O'Brien (59:04), 40-49 Cindy Mitchell (1:00:53), 50-59 Irene O'Brien, (59:04). MEN'S AGE GROUP WINNERS 1449 Steven Outen. (45:02), 30-39 Geoffrey Hull (45:23), 40-49 Randy Green (1:00:42), 50-59 Steve Granek(53:59). Full Marathon 9.. OVERALL WOMEN'S JulieBrandt-Glass, Calif. (1:27:28), Penny Wright,Phoenix(1:32:33).Sandra De Byron, Calif, (1:32:34). { OVERALL MEN'S Chad Hedrick,Texas(1:16:21), Harry Howlett (1:18:52),Jordan Nelson, Cob. (1:18:53). WOMEN'S AGE GROUP WINNERS z 20-29 Julie Brandt-Glass (1:27:28), 30-39 Penny Wright(1:32:33)40-49 Sue Bream (1:41:41) 50-59 Alice Eads(1:56:29). MEWS-;ISE GROUP WINNERS Under 14 Kevin;Puhtmann(1:45:50),:.14-19 Jordan Nelson, 20-29 Chad Hedrick(116:21),: 111 30-39 Michael.Weitze (1:20:08),40-49 Dana. Betsman ((1:22:05), 50-59 Robert Minami (1:32:33),60+George Nelms(1:53:19). IreStmi to life a4. • Wednesday,December 8,1 AZTEC P.1000,4.... - .•.•.• . Al • .• 0 . jffini:::- ....... .,,,!.,,,-,.......„:„:.„.... ...:.-.-:-: ,..--..--.:•.. . - . .. r' ' ::::,:,,.....':!:-.:.:;:..:-...,...:::-,...,::::............ii...::Ka---:. .....-: 041:H7.-....,-:, -._.e , ,..,#,,,,,,:::-,,::.:.:---:::::- •-::.:- ...... . . ,.:.. .. :..::...:.:..:..:.....:..: :: ::....:..„:„.„...„.. . . .:. . ...H,.._:...,:.:,.....;,,,,P.-1. • ... :.. • ••- "Vd- th... ..ti:en. •wlthnewtwnds• • _ yp,,,,,,,,,,F,,„4„:„.....,._.:„......... • � -: • .. • and-involvement with .:.:.:. .. ... .. '. .. ... ,. „. .... ..:: ��y,_,,.,:-•-^.!'t.. ,:.;:-:-';:ins Aadse tib:'.. .. _ ':. :. :: ...... • • •: : :"�nstra+ctiextial• skating with � .� The pave+d:path•that p1 S g- senor-.c inerts and...children. a ' . :. '' ' ,. s.� 40.4 slde•the kil ito RRive•i•rin a pop- gr x- . . .. . . -•, eat tri€ar me when I see then .. _ ular:plate tu.:get sumo mar do well" :go on to skate inraces •. ``` ti;;:# v v ... ... .. .,, Case."�fTitlkers,..,loggers and:c or fly 'r Pa's m r�I ed. - _ ,er : ;� Y W shied teach' _ '' . share t� withahe c�west.tom, .....A+.�idr.'..: �8 •�;� *1, _ .. .. - -�,� • i x in-lineakate�s. fes'•marks'.andRecreationk.:1: �' • ., .lf'yoq d'lilcc to join tn.on tht fun•. Misty :.. a1ad..:` ' �. - t ... -- _ , -- pcc• .• .,,offersi . ... . . . ....:.--. e.-•,..,• -:.......:,Coptdinitet.--,b.f. , ..,- --. ;':-. ' ..,.'- -I t .If , :titik". .'.:.-.::•--- -------:--' '''''.-' - ' n''''''' ' '',' 1 " . Flus _ �• z,, r' .Q c sin bah .Pinks. add- ,r,:. • _ lases i R on'' t beg• E intrsttitdiate:.iii I found.that•inline she: t�ir xi.. '_ :';'..-i,.. ,..:f._ a - 1 skating: sketi-r I.popular -�:he:..� _ .- t= .• -.... -: y • • • _ A3oug with .. ' '... .. the ns�. -'.-., � x. �� "r.'"'`;�""'�,..`,•' teaching silt-. :I1�::our community, tent, most:dada- _ c dents horor:.:t© cued andhoss'a i - . , a , and wanted,to offer ..... ,-4--.',,;574 -.4 tit •.. skcite.,°the +dam lot of pat iencc. 41':s: `:• 7 : r ~-:. 77 L. tl how:to: ;Addition.. .. -a� a# safely.. using. :.: _• the community-:.:: g° abd.; l asset to:• P deslg�aed Nancy Thompson "'° • expacially:.:for its and: Director of Community Education „ .. Kevin Zii+nrnanl�il•t.A ui, Wig, .R t704aion; .... ..... :� :.. t `eeoe to the finish in the Cactus Classic The class s id +i :•::......'.'.'.:.:. Speed •insti�to r ...Ed:':....:::•: :..W •• • • :.... .• waci�r,.lis. a:.:coinp titive ' wrtie*t piraposal:'t.� :ol` :::.: :y'*, e er : rtta .. 1� '� -P�t :.. ndatic�n • uic �ewslets athl4'0: Ito . -.cycled.lid ty uC i 1*.: Raatn•.,Di Qlti iXntts:*.i :.. shiF fOntilitgetting$200 . local 4 std.1'16'miks-in die:El To*do Nancy Thompson; 1998,offering Coonoliave organized huts suck:--• .'f dab.: :: nsci :other -activities:.like-- .....ics.- -**key . 'mon. • '• ' ' : • •.': . • to:+beach the class, Clue.• Race'. Tucstni Club`:.miembc s::games- :. :i-:: . a . . . as tlrn�Cacdis . Speed * in , �..•' .. lam''competed a1 in accepted the•t> �r�"t �;dam.the:dC�f:��. �"t�C:lvtt 204Q:',in ':far":ny�r+e'' •`�'c�s�es 1 .���►, .' pdei� Tboa►pson F r ... .. ... ,� ... .: � the imileCactus Speed:Classic on found that ia-line(skating)is. web-ale. ... . 1� Madness 1 '$sod and 3 is i. visit Nov.:7.Wachter: Nth.amoeg tar in oti-coaunity,and" ""lit classic race this yeir :al: de Tucson in 1996. : :.,e.vi i-pe** .. .::' fixe iitional pid's� .• oar'it'at":PP.teea's T 99 :fir►..11:.tit:,:and:*26: : INLINE RACING r ` and myself to make up a large lady&soft Tfacietioe's,Tran, bated great and skated awes 3 Jacqueline Mali.$,lulie Bryant. amount of ground,With half a la-r. WIN. said Wright.'She stayed v h the guys Shirley 2 Debbie Dunn;3 Kri- 1+ the main pack slowed o pottif011-T.ixscr pack,.&*coedit:Tit :: the most and then wt � MO P! min ;2 Karen win': � keg ski that 'behind son Fire Q r r ft and Rural Miro . . win. D ing > Thacker;3 Chris Williams.2 tiiiii o ca t-tit(' M r d to be in the fi- t. :Chadt H r - tAV uccr Dt tool:s 1 vdu)nowre- .Ub-2 Misty Ha l.1 19 kihe .d ....` . natint. ()no, we+aught ut I saw 2 Haffy#o t R E;:3 Joida Nel-- r'''Itittes near Phoenix,J:may lace up 2 Rel Hardy:3 Jetlelyne. • +- �Wt� .BL • her skates more often.\ to see mix were missingI four 5 Mott Wart . et s �beck *rena. MARYLAND :4ii.'.iai4li t e �of 6 up ahead _ :n Nel soe- yromGs; CARAVAN l E SERIES with Attiatid t F� Bnand :. 2 1W0I css Martian Dam- By JohttBim- Jul 1O-0C1'23. . 14baen Babonneat.skim ' , •4 Ryan ;5 Ed W r-ruc- ponsored by C. ravan Skate and:z1wolftio S nfra iWvt<x t.: i _ +.,....f. ._ , �r � 8 6 Aaron,1 t -7 Gra t was the last of 9 events.The In final8 S '9 Kevin inaugural cis saw 100 racers sprint won.f",ardini -ttt8; 2041.4nd S;i nhatell ±d NVe were left Asti pbe11100 PRO;10 Larry 6riese- f from the cif-Attic region compete to racefor 7th :;i$06 to go,l led out -: Heather Ater; on a .r mile closed loop. Each event BOte06 and Max iresti for the second 2 Dir Wright-POW* had three rads~2t Kids 1-12;Cat field sprint win but we just got nicked .-,:,.."4.1-- , stir iso;4 K Ellis�kK suRF£R:5 lam- 10K beginners..Cat 1/2 10K Advanced, nut at the line by a foot Salomon. ..,,;... key Ream;6 MithelliAedina-pRewoRiski Prizes were awarded to the top s I got {:yjewiof the last 500 of Ps;7 Denise Kt -tater at :;8 Kiin:!!:tioiect and women in each The kid t# ' , Ast.4,0 Horgan and. two :. Nut rlein-tart sx8;9 Ann B ell-TuC- tOMmenced with Race 44.The acikop WI Sakai �onH.a beak 10 Becky Bre-t .s was fast and furious as skaters Stott- iii a it was down to the final!print. n e d points from eachrace to- �rt� ee: o took onfrca7n �=` 'KENTUCKY wags ache overall title of Series sham- the ,and putted 1-0 feet from r- „ By ClydeGilbey pion:The awardswent to the*top two nit was dose,:b b Nor- , . - A Bowling Green-Oct 2,1999... skaters in each category :.: o the wit* r . . _ ,F s ne-third of the coarse was... til Beginner � deckled r with and Swiftirrhne �- �. ..m.- icing the 1st mile up Nash- in theirate with bra p- �n title. Arnaud f.� ue�l took it for 7 Norm Kirby-xR Pi 8 l ►8argnien; vim Road and the last 1/2 mile to bail-wumErs Wto-t.s edging out f e- thet . ► . For the verall team 9 f E #D ly.l :.1/2 veOut= the finish.Beautiful weatherproucieri len t•Berner Men was dominated for tItO men -Salomon took err°_2 ieottfor X1;:.3: :Gane•Wemen ideal race conditions and highiris. b Damon ► r at - :. g, and'ohm. ''fi r d and, :: :.:........ _--_-___-- ___- Clare throe i ' h Shuler dim- IMIII*000;10.14040ft3 R+ 1 ing top honors, Rachael ( t• YuFE 2 Franck g mt. Cada Silo ll ; o 3 Sanfratello- , „E: " in the final race to Capture Ad nced cC! CarolineLa- .. liii-,,, ;' '‘Abrnen title.Kevin Caehman-sos had a ► + t;2 J hley HO 3-Pum, '. a .• firm hold on top honors for Advanced 4� • f winning race ant iflii%l - USA:Aiuzor - '' Rodney G rabinski-ROS i s CACTUS::S:��E .. SS.i.0 all (' grabbed the other spot. Darren y1.4:Ilse Mont.'C ''" Kauffman and � Snader tied for t ai :: :.r: +r.. .._.... the• title ofKit Champion. 'R csan:inli - hosted . .. , Visit http://members,aal,cam/intine .themarathon arm:half-marathon TeamCaravanlf ravan.htr for complete *for - * '-the-:ard::anntiat mus Speed ' job, • resins from this series and for details C asiic.f.pin* fjQ5s!fpm all over the . ' on next yeark series. molly cat to_-ate in:t *desert l fidatligalik Kevin Gehmart 180;2 Rod p smith' �n ion a:warm ark i r Grabinski 151; 3 Jose Escobar 127.4 Don t lr m rni .: slowly ,r Geise 97;5 Mike�90 Damon Sly; turned into an.--80+7:Arizona day - I .-. . ,- -..--�_- ler 192:2 Tom Gardner' ;3 Stuart Aust course.:was.a-:2f 2.mile- . that'had I . „. i 88:4 Chris Volz 72;5 St `:fin 51.-':H7glii :i74000:sit ti roe raid umen A Rachael.Cibroski 169;2 Cam- and a challenging-23 mile.:uphill rm. Meter Champs:Fr cjsce1 - r P�rf�gh the rum re pis i la Silva 156;3�:6raber 117:4 Heath- i :Halfm�ar�athc�nerrs happily-missed a :.,- j:, -. . ..' . .r3 _. ..: er Pennypa t 114;'5 Monica Phillips 101. .4 the ropgh road:600.hills. Mara:Julie Bort-Fite;2 Fenny. This year the obstacles were rum Bei Bebe!!120;2 Helen Wu 101 :Civer$5000 tiirdlii givenway in:fav Wri ht-t�aro;3 3 $ 4: still on the�r and the unknown 3 Laura P" 98;4 Sally Moss 78;5 Mich- raffle:- ich- .. .. ra :-per. Skaters:went-bion h Bream;S Lisa Truitt '6 Slxy �: spectator standing in the mi-dile of elle Brown 74.K tri Darren katrffmani luso Speed: Ni ' 3�s 38:4 Brittany : n _ skates, ): trrr IWuechte��.$8et�cy Briggs;$� the last turn!Brian Laugle set the paceLuke Snader 54; clt :ai'14:a Edi.:Matzger.::vim- •Eads;10'Sandra Cis 1/t Michelle-Ratites early climbing Nashville Road.Strate- ShatAir 37:5 Zach College 34. : n tei* *an.many.the .2 Bissell;S laurel Geskeiltene O'Brien gi breaks by Sam weaver and Clyde mo Miniktv.Gehman 19.40;2 Juan Go- raffle prizes.!Mark your:calendars-ndar. for" : . Gtr pared the lead pack down to 6 rpt 19:40;3 Billy Ford 19:40;4 Ked tleCs 4:**1 classic IV-l4iar.�t�uxn;. - �'�! �. 10K cis by mile 2..pre race fin- 19 5 John Wang19:52. m; y r .N+�n :L.2000, . . By Pete Snell ished with a furious : f'd .A��-Novv 1+4,,, uphill'int with 2���wioz,31'irtr�t� 4 Sr~Qlz: out locals Gilbey t and 5 Shuler.Weston Adv Gloria.Goer 20:10; ':C�Speed:c/o* moo ore than- !skates�petel. La� edging # 'Oovr to .'CollqueSclPenny rig t-m: aR CCOOti V* for #1 overall in 19:09. Special blips 20:25;3 Cibroski 2085;4•Graber het. -is.a coovnupltyevirtha is: M menle4"Tice course was semi- retkignition goes to Brandon Powers 2313.Beg Parton;2 Bor. spotted byttw 1vf/ tag ::thank-- rough, but pretty good They for his lump over the speed bumps on l ffigniett Gin :15:2 Grabittski •Isittradham.Nation EAvcutive Bial,:Cox • allowed cross-drafting so there were Highland Way and sponsor Nat§Cut- 20:16;3 Escobar 20:18;4 ii! 24;18; tf T o-O:bd -tlyifr disadvantages,but we man d7 door Store for thebeautiful t rchies. 5�s 2021.Bei Gaffer 25:082 Shuler ykith.oNorm:40lIt&T e,Blue Norm y- n r s andJordan am Brian L t. le;2 ciyde Gilbey;3 Atm 25:50:3*Id Greener 25:58:4 Bob Parti; • i i d,: And€rti !�-''S$Joe Tho- to 26;x:Vii�lol�27:54. l�nn & V� .* ?4d.4r�1-rt �:� worked their WO* Valk. ,; n �� y- tt`S ApexHat Nm'r1e ; u : and g9i,ave, takingHen mas;2 Ly s;3 DePOISnista.4E packer 20:22:2 Cibroski 20:23:3 Phillips Brggets Bels,Caywood Paint, • Ern.4400.040Pttandtri atm, ji Paul Cagier:2 Gary .. :. .. 3 Bill 2152E 4 Silva 23;57;5 Graber 24:12.IN Dfsett Auto,Eddy auger Workshop,Fast Defending of -Aaron J� so Harrigan. -39 Sam We :2 ri Pinotti; Br+ 26:06:2' 25:15:3 Karla Selzer - � ts:Sk School..1m Chir.t:__rio.tae- .o got shut out earlyand settled for 3 JohnS��. e 2 Mark 27,54:4 CindyS 29:32. l 6th.Heather Laufer former LIS.Work! Me r ;, mon Po- 7 Adv G ��•2 Ford f�Ate:�; .... . : $ .:Palm.i am member and World Champ took wen' John Day;3 Chadwick S 3 Gr I ki 20:04.4;4 :04.75. v- -ta to 1f 1 v,,S ralon:El:Coinufs- the starting line in great form. *She %,.11knom Camille fi ght:2 Katon Burns; se 20:00.ligg Shuler 2310.1,2 Dettnit :iii .: bonus money,the highest ever for any z January 9,2000 at 4:30 pm.SL Hosting the coverage is two men is the highest men's purse ever time i romnanch mp MarkAllen.`97X1'erra champion Mike a V"v.,11 women,the fourth best ever. Pigg,and cycling commentator Peter Graves. 3 . 'd for the Marathon.with 24.621 finishers.The .': and • 17,193 finishersset in 1998. For mate information,contact WWWxterras net '►i K.: .y,. aor 'IC's"', n—x_.h ..-? x gar. ---t.wvu .gin•- .. r .a_ j Whim.will bean Sunday,October ,2000in: r. t the Marathon or the Rally TotalFitness E3 Fit Cactus Speed Classic III _ i g ° "' Sahuarlta,AZ-The rrson Jane Sk8 Club held the Cactus Speed Classic Iia on e • Sunday,November 7th. Skaters from all over the county came to skate in me desert Race on awann and balmy 61-degree morning,which slowly turned into an 80+-degree lora - day.The marathon course was a 26.2-mile loop that had hills,a 7-mile stretch of 0 shave returned to their respective rough road and a challenging 2,5-anile uphill finish.The half marathoners happily performance at the PourW nds adventure most of the rough road and hills. area.Team Soho `s incarnation at this race The top ten finishers of the marathon were Chad Hedrick,Harry Howlett,Jordan Nelson,Mikael Wei e,Arron Warr.Fd Wachter,Norm Kirby,Dana.Bergmen,Dana Laura Roberts frorn Dallas,and low Eads and Andy.Pete,Ed Fast Eddie"Wachter,Arizona's local skating celebrity was ce Wilke. apo e t g tY ��tt��FF home. earn the only Zone to finish in the top 10.- !Tucson ThisTucson-based team_ .:. *mates(,,aura,Andy and mike)who filled The top female finishers were Julie Glass-Brandt,Penny right,Sandra De • -members who had injured themselves k Byrun,Sue Bream,Lisa Tradewell,Stacy Eldridge,Kimberly Nuechterlem Becky Days :';f .:._ Briggs,Alice Eads and Sandra Cates.The ladies handled the course with grace and e on thelawn at thInn in Pam ',> determination,as � f ',IN. The top three male half marathoners were Steve Outen,Geoffrey Hull were ed up.:The evening race briefing Y,,` rots described by their UniversalUniversal , and Steve Grarrel�.The female finishers were Michelle Fuentes,Anne _ � • Bissell and Laurel kef`lrene O'Brien.Laurel and Irene had such a great Thisinformation in turnrevealed the , of mo a n biking ani!21'milesof z .,"" 1 tune on the course that they skated across the finish line laughing and ,eslathe middle.The course was a bit shorter ; . ; holdinghands,creating a tie for third place. 0 ibout-124 miles and had a winning ''' Over 1,5000 was given away in free raffle prizes.Skaters went home ed to finish wind 24 hours 0 c-1, with such goodies as Pure Speed Niinja bearingm,skates,wheels and an rt Eddy Matzger workshop.The younger skaters won several of the top raffle l for a run tht�ough Antelope prizes!Many skaters commented on what a at race it was and will be it more than two or three few gide. :. next year.Markyour calendars for theSpeedIV +g which took six hours!Some of this was i back ext y axCactus Classic i . Marathon,Sunday,November 5,2000, how some of the rest of the hike-a-bike • The Cactus Speed Classic is held to raise money for the Pima g of the goatheads that caused Team Heir le as they kayaked across Lake - Community College Scholarship Fund.The race is a community event ig the shoreline.At a beach some eleven or that is supported by the following sponsors:the Tohono O 'odha Nation Executive Branch,Cox Communications,the lbhono O odham Utility tappet_and,for a brief minute,ntit8,did Authority,Lovitt&Touche,Blue Cross/Blue Shield, lore,Verducci,Cox ::.. B fines, {■b�`{{`••jj� - �:::- Communications,.Albertson's,Apex Hardbody Nutrient/sem.Bauer,���but first a �� the by �transition .).X::x:•',-C:,::.. � ` �t�� Y e�� Paint���Y� Eddy�1��M w� �... tzger rksh p, 0 ,eet up with the super crew for hot -_:A:Y:_:: , 'B g CaywoodPain, Auto. Fast Eddies Skate School.Lim Click Auto,Labeda.Mid Valley Athletic it,A dark,dark.no-moon-dark kayak ' .. Club,oasis Water,PBAA,Play It Again Sports,Polar,Pure Speed,Bacetech, 0 ale,hulking houseboats led the team to thr_Team Sonora finished a dew secondsit Revi,Sheraton El Conquistador Resort.Trader toe's.Transpack,Voler,Wild Oats,and Jamba Juice,with extra support from Tucson Parks& Te(to the professional and very strongi Recreation,'I reati1icson Firewent,and Rural Metro. person coed category and fourth overall. Dep -Diana"Blade Morn"Comm P'' 1. ; 1 '"+�'- `•fir _ - ,,,,,1417.....: 1•ter 5. r� � f .�, �.:f � .t ��..��'�+7. ' C F LS Proud to be Ile NW a -- °fill)"de IiKson i , _ - ,... ,,,-,.,,, . cf .02. - - , - . ..... ..., . __....- ..i. .„ . :, •.N.,,..-.....,- , '9 s' .• ' _ilt..iter 4'. `. 'Mut, Meat Ycyursdie at . . • .• 4 0, Ar•,. , ' . . . (Dfle Obt C)ur ES PriliCSOrt. IAV ,, tt, fvettlhe;c'- ,-.0 (.7 .t..4 �-, :;. ort-7 3 1~ :.... Iii43 E.&nautili ,,a' ' 1;.. ' ' j°4- , • .;y,4., 67 ' 41.4 iy,,,,..20€_0,112 • „, . .. . . ''''''. re - - - _•.,.... ::•A;=>;. , One Wat Centrim with Pure lase z'' r/ti..iit'53/-966: -Container of' I .. . ,. ,. '-. ._4.--_,4 (..-- 5665 N Stott-Rd Rd *. ��. M,iii,e,29-7424. ,. of � � ream � eese.,. .iit ' (7- 7127 E -risque llode CP*COW/On fie cit'SOn StttSe * (..a.; 6/65 E Fveatiteatt so,,,,,i.4,Jr,)Ottie AY,V'4,$(.04M EV,4*-4.4c.34,ZO(..;; J.. MVP %‘185.-Ci M'm'745-08W 8 _ .. • i. r .. ..•J•T1...........I.• . ���- - �•�rAl•••�rp•�tirr..... •�+f••! N. IhilWitt • Tucson In-line Sk8 Club 3890 West Sunny Hills Place Tucson, AZ 85741 (520) 744-3787 September 19,2000 The Honorable Mayor Loomis 11000 North La Canada Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Dear Mayor Loomis, It was a pleasure speaking with you last week regarding the Cactus Speed Classic IV Marathon&Half- marathon in-line skating events.The Tucson In-line Sk8 Club is a non-profit organization that has hosted this event for the past three years.The event raises money for Pima Community College and the Tohono O'odham Community College Scholarship Funds.The participants have voted the Cactus Speed Classic "Best In-line Skating Event"in Arizona for the past three years. As we discussed,I am looking for a partnership with an organization because the event has continued to grow since its beginning.The Cactus Speed Classic is the only in-line skating marathon in the state. We draw skaters from all over the United States and last year the World champion male and female skaters participated in the event.It is my understanding that America's top ranked skating team will be skating the event this year along with the World champion. With regards to the cost of the event and contributions by the Town of Oro Valley,a final budget on costs will be determined by the traffic control costs of the course.I took your recommendation and looked at maps for possible courses but was not very successful. Hopefully,the Oro Valley traffic engineers will be able to work with us on a recommended 26.2-mile course. I have attached a budget for the event for us to discuss at our meeting.It is not my expectation that Oro Valley pick up all of the expenses.However,for the event to be the"Oro Valley Cactus Speed Classic"we will need to discuss both of our expectations and assign a dollar amount for support. Our organization works closely with the Tucson Parks&Recreation Department,specifically Mr.Jim Conroy,Superintendent of Parks&Recreation. We have worked with Jim for the past three years organizing the in-line skating portion of the Tour for Tucson's Children as a part of our commitment to the community.Please feel free to give him a call at 791-4873 ext. 141 if you would like information about the Sk8 Club or the event. I look forward to our meeting and the possibility of working with the Town of Oro Valley. If you have any questions,please feel free to give me a call at 744-3787. I will give your office a call to set up a meeting. Sincerely, Diana M.Coonce, Race Director,Cactus Speed Classic Budget for Cactus Speed Classic V November 4, 2001 Advertising $13,000 Traffic Control $ 3,000 Route Support $ 2,000 Equipment $ 5,000 Supplies/Insurance $ 5,000 TOTAL $28,000 • Advertising includes radio, print and television • Traffic control includes officers, signage and vehicles • Route support includes personnel and vehicles to transport equipment • Equipment includes cones, barricades, pot-a-potties, generator,tables and chairs • Supplies/insurance, includes DJ and all other items needed to put on the event • Water, fruit and other food is usually donated i t ,,, , 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY UUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: David L. Andrews, Finance Director SUBJECT: Council Acceptance of Town Financial Audit for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2000 SUMMARY: The Town's Budget and Bond Committee held its regular meeting on November 6, 2000. The purpose of the meeting, in addition to other items, was to review the results of the Town's annual financial audit. Mr. Dennis me g, to the the Osuch with the certified public accounting firm of Cronstrom&Trbovich made presentation committee. The audit was conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the auditors have rendered an opinion that the Town's general purpose financial statements fairly present the Town's financial p position as of June 30, 2000. Mr. Craig Trbovich, partner in the accounting firm, would like to present an overview of the audit to the Council this evening. NALYSIS: followingare selected highlights of the Town's financial operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000: The ✓ The General Fund's fund balance at fiscal year end totaled $10,666,101. The fund balance increased by $1,802,096 or 20% compared to last fiscal year (page 36). ✓ General Fund revenues exceeded budget by $2,045,520 primarily related to construction sales tax ($1,177K), building permit fees ($492K) and interest income of$229,000 (page 36). ✓ General Fund expenditures for Town departments were below budget and overall were below budget (excluding g ycontingency reserves of$5,549,471 and land acquisition of$3,243,500) by$910,329 (page36). ✓ The Highway Fund's fund balance increased by $291,629 to close the year at $2,275,520. Revenues g y exceeded budget by$175,993 (page 40). ✓ The fund balance for the Public Transportation Fund (Coyote Run) increased by $82,848 (page 43). ✓ The Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fees Fund has a fund balance of$6,528,366. Funding of $1,608,705 for capital improvement projects was expended during the fiscal year (page 61). ✓ The Alternative Water Resources Development Impact Fees Fund has a fund balance of$1,327,143 (page 58). ✓ The Oro Valley Water Connection Fees Fund has a fund balance of$1,159,384 (page 59). 1...i...I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 3 With respect to the Oro Valley Water Utility: ✓ Revenues exceeded budget by$1,612,395 including $1,226,447 in water sales and $248,279 in interest g income. ✓ Expenses of$5,722,863 (including personnel, operations & maintenance, depreciation, amortization and interest expenses) exceeded budget by$299,128. This was primarily due to emergency repairs and additional electricity for pumping due to dry weather conditions. ✓ Retained year s at end was $2,229,262 which is an increase of$1,217,400 from last fiscal year (page 10). ✓ Cash at the end of the fiscal year was $8,543,686 (page 11). The following is a breakdown of this amount: Operating Cash $4,049,665 Cash held by trustee for debt service payments 1,406,837 Cash—Project Improvements 799,244 Debt Service Reserve Fund 2,287,940 Total $8,543,686 'ontributed capital of$2,589,698 includes $1,735,703 of executed line extension agreements with area developers. A full set of the Town's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was placed on file with the Town Clerk on November 17 for public review. The document will be bound and submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association in late December. Full sets of the report will be distributed to Council at that time. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Independent Auditor's Report (pages 1-2) 2. Letter of Transmittal to Mayor and Council from Town Manager &Finance Director (pages i-viii) 3. General Fund—Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance-Budget and Actual (page 36) 4. Highway Fund-Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance-Budget and Actual g y (page 40) 5. Public Transportation Fund-Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance-Budget and Actual (page 43) Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fees Fund-Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance-Budget and Actual (page 61) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 3 OF 3 7. Alternative Water Resources Fund-Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance- Budget and Actual (page 58) 8. Oro Valley Water Connection Fees Fund-Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance-Budget and Actual (page 59) 9. Combined Statement of Revenues &Expenses—Water Utility (page 10) 10. Cash Flow Statements—Water Utility (page 11) 11. Combined Statement of Revenues &Expenditures —Budget to Actual (pages 8-9) 12. Combined Balance Sheet (pages 4-5) 13. State Expenditure Limitation Report (pages 1-5) 14. Single Audit Act Reports (pages 1-7) xECOMMENDATION: Acceptance of the financial audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 is recommended. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to accept the Town of Oro Valley's financial audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000. or I move to . . . David L. Andrews Finance Director Chuck Sweet Town Manager CRONSTROMIII & ATRBOVICH CCOUNTANT S INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT The Honorable Mayor and the Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona We have audited the accompanying general-purpose financial statements of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona (Town), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2000, as listed in the table of y contents. These general-purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the Town's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general-purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general-purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general-purpose financial statements. An audit pp g also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall general-purpose financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 4. In our opinion, the general-purpose financial statements referred to above present fairlyin all n-17E-El resects, the financial •osition oft - own of Oro Valle Arizona as of June 30, 2000, and the resul • • •a- - ••a • •• •- .sh flows of its •ro•rietary fund types for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated September 8, 2000 on our consideration of the Town's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. 1 8706 EAST MANZANITA DRIVE,SUITE 100 • SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85258 • (480) 348-1102 • FAX (480) 348-1 104 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general-purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The combining and individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules listed in the table of contents as supplementary information are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general-purpose financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general-purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the general-purpose statements taken as a whole. The other information included in this report, designated as the "Statistical Section" in the table of contents, was not audited by us and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. tA.oA/cvbtffw\ . C Cronstrom & Trbovich, P.C. September 8, 2000 2 w_EY O �t O � 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY C 41 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE ". ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 A A Administrative Offices(520)229-4700 Fax(520)297-0428 www.ci.oro-valley.az.us °UNDED�9 September 8, 2000 TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL Town of Oro Valley, Arizona The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the Town of Oro Valley for the year ended June 30, 2000, is hereby submitted. Local ordinances and state statutes require that the Town issue annuallya report on its financial position and activity, and that this report be audited by an independent firm of certified public accountants. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with management. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data are accurate in all material respects and are reported in a manner that presents fairly the financial position and results of operations of the various funds and account groups of the Town of Oro Valley. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the Town's activities have been included. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is presented in three sections: Introductory, Financial and Statistical. The Introductory Section includes this letter of transmittal, the GFOA Certificate of Achievement, an organizational chart and a list of the Town of Oro Valley's elected officials and department heads. The Financial Section includes the general purpose financial statements and the combining and individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules, as well as the independent auditor's report on these financial statements and schedules. The Statistical Section includes selected financial and demographic information, generally presented on a multi-year basis. The Town of Oro Valley is required to undergo an annual single audit in conformity with the provisions of the Single Audit Act of 1996 and U.S. Office of Management and Budget's Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. The auditor's report states that the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, complied, in all material respects, with thep rovisions required of the Single Audit Act of 1996 and U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133,Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. The financial reporting entity (the Town) includes all the funds and account groups of the p rima goverment (i.e., the Town of Oro Valley as legally defined). The Town provides a full primary g range of services including police protection; the construction and maintenance of streets and infrastructure; the provision of water services; public transportation services; recreational activities and cultural events. In addition to general government activities, the governing body is financially accountable for the Municipal Property Corporation; therefore, this activity is included in the reporting entity. GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE,LOCAL ECONOMIC CONDITION AND OUTLOOK Governmental Structure Oro Valley was incorporated in 1974. It is located in northeastern Pima County and has a land area of 32 square miles. The current population is estimated at 27,350. The towng overnment operates under the Council-Manager form of government. Policymaking and legislative authority is vested in the Town Council, which consists of a Mayor and four Councilmembers. Councilmembers are elected to four-year staggered terms. The citizens of Oro Valley elect the Mayor. The Council, from among its members, selects the Vice-Mayor. The Town Council is responsible, among other things, for the adoption of local ordinances, budget adoption, the development of citizen advisory committees and the hiring of the Town Manager. The Manager is responsible for implementation of the policies of the Town Council. The Town pp Manager appoints all department heads except the Town Clerk, Chief of Police, Town Engineer g and Magistrate. Local Economic Condition and Outlook The Town of Oro Valley's local economic condition and outlook is expected to remain positive over the next five to ten years. As in prior years, sales tax collections from construction, retail trade and hotel/motel industries along with state shared revenues are the Town's major revenue sources. Sales tax collections from construction totaled $3,022,948, which is 52% of total sales tax collections. This is a $625K or 26% increase compared to last fiscal year. Construction related sales tax collections are anticipated to remain a significant portion of the Town's sales tax base over the next five years. Retail sales tax collections increased by $823,000 (122%) over last fiscal year. This significant increase was mainly attributed to the openings of two major retailers during the fiscal year. Also, several restaurants and smaller retail stores opened for business throughout the year. This figure is expected to increase due to the growth of the Town and the need for local shopping opportunities and services. Sales tax collections from the hotel/motel lodging industry increased by 14% compared to last fiscalear. The resort hotel industry has enjoyed a favorable business climate over the past few y years and the local four-star resort recently completed an expansion of its facilities. The Town consummated an economic development agreement with a five-star resort in January 2000. The facility expects its opening date to be in November 2002 and will generate approximately $1.3M in direct sales taxes annually. State shared taxes will increase by approximately $3.OM annually in FY 2001-02. This figure assumes an estimated Town population of 30,000 pursuant to the Year 2000 Census. ii MAJOR INITIATIVES The Town of Oro Valley completed several significant projects this fiscal year and has included several others in the budget for fiscal year 2000/2001. CDO Riverfront Park was completed in April 2000 at a total cost of $2,432,109 with funding sources coming from the Town and $1,250,000 from Pima County bond proceeds. Park facilities include soccer and baseball fields, tennis courts and ramadas. In fiscal year 2000/2001, $1 million has been budgeted for renovations to the swimming pool at Dennis Weaver Park. Another addition to the Town's campus is a new community development building. This building houses community development administration, planning and zoning, building safety and thep ublic works engineering division. Total cost of this facility including architectural services, construction and furnishings totaled $1,509,710 and was financed with 1999 Municipal Property Corporation bonds. Construction of a new Town library is scheduled to begin early this fiscal year with a budget of $5,080,000. Funding for the project will come from Pima County ($2 million) with the remaining balance being financed by the Town. $3,075,000 has been budgeted in fiscal year 2000/2001 for the possible purchase of a 173-acre parcel of land located near Town hall facilities. The Arizona State Land Department has scheduled an auction of this land for December 2000. The Town may use the land for expansion of Town facilities. Several road improvement projects are scheduled in the upcoming year. These improvements include street maintenance and repairs, bicycle lanes, multi-use paths, drainage studies, roadway system capacity improvements and traffic signals. Oro Valley Water Utility has included $7.8 million in system upgrade and expansion projects for fiscaly ear 2000/2001. Significant projects include transmission/distribution mains, reservoirs, wells and booster stations. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Town Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the government are protected from loss, theft, or misuse and to ensure that adequate accounting data are compiled to allow for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The internal control structure is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgements by management. As a recipient of federal and state financial assistance, the management is also responsible for ensuring that an adequate internal control structure is in place to ensure and document compliance with applicable laws and regulations related to these programs. This internal control structure is subject to periodic evaluation by management. iii As a part of the Town's single audit, tests were made of the internal control structure and of its compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including those related to federal financial assistance programs. Although this testing was not sufficient to support an opinion on the Town's internal control system or its compliance with laws and regulations related to nonmajor federal financial assistance programs, the audit for the year ended June 30, 2000, disclosed no material internal control weaknesses or material violations of laws and regulations. In addition, the Town of Oro Valley maintains extensive budgetary controls. The objective of these controls is to ensure compliance with legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the government's council. Activities of the general fund, certain special revenue funds, enterprise funds, debt service funds and capital projects funds are included in the annual budget. The level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is the departmental level for the General Fund and in total by fund for the other funds. The Town also maintains an encumbrance accounting system as one method of maintaining budgetary control. Encumbered amounts lapse at year end. However, outstanding encumbrances generally are reappropriated as part of the subsequent year's budget. As demonstrated by the statements and schedules included in the Financial Section of this report, the Town of Oro Valley continues to meet its responsibility for sound financial management. General Government Functions The following schedule presents a summary of General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds and Capital Projects Funds revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 and the amount of increases and decreases in relation to the prior year. Increase/(Decrease) 1999/00 Percent From 1998/99 1998/99 Revenue Category Amounts Of Total Amount Percent Amounts Local taxes $ 6,139,176 27.83% $ 1,620,444 35.86% $ 4,518,732 Intergovernmental 9,167,682 41.55 2,387,279 35.21 6,780,403 Fines & forfeiture 344,627 1.56 13,595 4.11 331,032 Licenses & permits 1,613,798 7.31 201,978 14.31 1,411,820 Charges for services 296,801 1.35 56,856 23.70 239,945 Contributions & donations 9,247 0.04 7,246 319.64 2,001 Special assessments 3,089,814 14.00 616,980 24.95 2,472,834 Interest 1,332,605 6.04 372,374 38.88 960,231 Other income 69,036 0.32 18,134 37.30 50,902 Total $ 22,062,786 100.00% $ 5,294,886 31.58% $ 16,767,900 Total revenues for fiscal year 1999/2000 increased by $5,294,886 or 31.6%. Local taxes, intergovernmental revenues and special assessments were the primary revenue sources that accounted for the increase. iv Local taxes increased by $1,620,444. Retail sales tax collections increased by $823K compared to last fiscal year due to the opening of several major retail chains and local businesses in the Oro Valley area. Sales tax collections from construction related activities increased by $625K as compared to last fiscal year. Intergovernmental revenues increased by $2,387,279. State and federal grant revenue increased by $489,239. State and county shared revenues increased by $1,898,040, which includes $1,250,000 in bond proceeds from Pima County for the construction of CDO Riverfront Park. Special assessments increased by $616,980 primarily due to development impact fees collected in the Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fees fund for roadway system capacity improvements. The following schedule presents a summary of General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds and Capital Projects Funds expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 and the increases and decreases in relation to prior year amounts. Increase/(Decrease) 1999/00 Percent From 1998/99 1998/99 Expenditure Category Amounts Of Total Amount Percent Amounts Current General government $ 4,128,050 21.84% $ 810,382 24.43% $ 3,317,668 Public safety 6,216,390 31.38 975,774 18.62 5,240,616 Highways & streets 1,855,146 8.36 706,073 61.45 1,149,073 Culture & recreation 637,084 3.22 782 0.12 636,302 Other - claims & judgments 600,000 3.03 600,000 0.00 -0- Capital outlay 5,537,058 28.09 4,658,215 530.04 , 878,843 Debt Service Principal 480,000 2.42 80,000 20.00 400,000 Interest & fiscal charges 355,782 1.66 14,696 4.31 341,086 Bond issuance costs -0- 0.00 (52,126) (100.00) 52,126 Total Expenditures $ 19,809,510 100.00% $ 7,793,796 64.87% $ 12,015,714 As indicated in the schedule above expenditures increased by $7,793,796 or 64.9% primarily in the categories of general government, public safety, public works and capital outlay. General government expenditures increased by $810,382 attributed mainly to personnel costs and related benefits due to the Town's growth. The Town also spent $250,000 for a new campus- wide telephone system. Expenditures increased by $975,774 in the category of public safety. This increase was mainly attributed to additional personnel in the police department and building safety division. v Highways and streets expenditures increased by $706,073 due to purchases of street maintenance equipment, vehicles and the completion of various street improvement projects. Several street improvement projects that were not completed last fiscal year were completed this fiscal year. Several projects major 'ects were completed in this fiscal year which attributed to the increase of p $4,658,215 in capital outlay. CDO Riverfront Park was completed in June 2000 for a total of p $2,272,228. In April 2000, the community development building was completed. Total cost of the building was $1,395,827. In the Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fees fund a total of$1,608,705 was expended for roadway capacity improvements projects. General Fund Balance The General Fund's fund balance increased by $1,802,096 or 20% primarily due to better than expected revenue collections as previously discussed. Enterprise Operations At June 30, 2000, retained earnings for the Oro Valley Water Utility was $2,229,262 an increase of $1,217,400 (120%) from last fiscal year. This increase was primarily due to an increase in water usage during the extremely dry summer months of the past year. Contributed capital totaled $2,589,698 with $853,995 attributed to capital improvements from the Oro Valley Water Connection Fees Fund (development impact fees) and $1,735,703 from line extension agreements with area developers. Water revenues exceeded budget by $1,612,395. Operating expenses exceeded budget by $288,286 while capital assets were under budget by $1,970,106. Net income at June 30, 2000 was $1,217,400. Operating expenses that exceeded budget were primarily electricity for pumping and unexpected equipment repairs. Debt Administration At June 30, 2000, the Town had two Municipal Property Corporation bonds and a certificate of participation issue outstanding. $27,270,405 was the outstanding principal balance for the 1996 Municipal Property Corporation bonds issued for the purchase of the water utility. The 1999 Municipal Property Corporation bonds issued last fiscal year to finance water system improvements and the community development building had an outstanding principal balance of $3,143,624 and $1,625,000, respectively. The 1996 certificate of participation issue had an outstanding principal balance of$4,655,000. The Town had two capital leases outstanding at June 30, 2000, a police voice logger and a backhoe shared by the public works department and the water utility. Outstanding principal balances for the voice logger is $5,867 and $23,829 for the backhoe. An advance from the General Fund to the Oro Valley Connection Fees Fund was made in the amount of$558,000 on June 1, 1998. Outstanding principal at June 30, 2000 is $469,221. Cash Management Policies and Practices The Town uses a system of consolidated cash management. Cash from all funds is pooled in a central disbursement fund. Cash to be used for payment of current expenditures is maintained in a checking account, the balance of cash is maintained on deposit with the Arizona State Treasurer's Local Government Investment Pool. Cash in the Local Government Investment Pool is available upon 24 hours notice. The LGIP invests in U.S. Treasury Notes, U.S. Treasury Bills and federally guaranteed insurance contracts. The average interest rate for fiscal year 1998/99 was 5.339% and 5.885% for fiscal year 1999/2000. Investments held at LGIP earned interest revenue of $1,071,213 for the year ended June 30, 2000. vi A debt service reserve fund was established in 1996 for the Municipal Property Corporation (MPC) municipal al water system acquisition bonds. In 1999, MPC revenue bonds were issued for the construction of the community development building and for water system improvements and a reserve fund was also established. These reserve funds are maintained in a trust account with Wells Fargo Bank (formerly Norwest Bank). Funds on deposit in the trust accounts are invested solely in obligations that are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury, such as U.S. Treasury bills, bonds and notes ("U.S. Treasury Securities"). Interest on investments held with the trustee earned $257,789 for fiscal year 1999/2000. Risk Management The Town of Oro Valley participates in the Arizona Municipal Risk Retention Pool. Risk coverage includes general liability, errors and omissions, property and automobile insurance. The policy insures up to $2,000,000 per incident occurrence plus any excess liability of up to a $10,000,000 limit per occurrence per year. Coverage is provided on a claims made basis. The Townp articipates in the Arizona Municipal Workers Compensation Pool for workers compensation insurance coverage. The Town of Oro Valley is self-insured for unemployment compensation. Unemployment reserves totaled $228,593 as of June 30, 2000 for the Town's 219 employees. The Town did not make an unemployment contribution in fiscal year 1999/2000. Other Information Independent Audit Arizona statutes require an annual audit by independent certified public P accountants. The firm of Cronstrom and Trbovich P.C., CPAs was retained by the Town to perform the 2000 audit. In addition to meeting the requirements set forth in state statutes, the audit was also designed to meet the requirements of the federal Single Audit Act of 1996 and the related U.S. Office of Management and Budget's Circular A-133. Generally accepted auditing standards and the standards set forth in the General Accounting Office's Government Auditing Standards were used by the auditors in conducting the engagement. The auditor's report on the general-purpose financial statements and combining and individual fund statements and schedules is included in the Financial Section of this report. The auditor's reports on internal controls and compliance with applicable laws and regulations can be found in a separately issued single audit report. Awards The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the Town for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1999. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the Town published an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. The report satisfied both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current Comprehensive Annual Financial Report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. vii Acknowledgements We would also like to extend our appreciation to the Mayor and Council for their leadership and support. The preparation of this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was made possible by the dedicated work of the Finance Department staff. Each member of the department has our sincere appreciation for the contributions made in the preparation of this report. Respectfully submitted, / ' I Chuck Sweet Town Manager David L. Andrews Finance Director viii TOWN OF VALLEY ARIZONA (GENERAL FUNK STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE- BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues Taxes $ 4,962,000 $ 6,139,176 CLI_J=P..) Intergovernmental 5,432,316 5,486,779 54,463 Fines and forfeitures 201,000 202,714 1,714 Licenses and permits 1,105,000 1,596,520 .....9.1,5_2.2 Charges for services 210,600 269,665 59,065 Rents and royalties 10,000 - (10,000) Contributions and donations 1,000 8,397 7,397 Interest 318,600 547,657 C22905Z' Other 14,500 49,628 35._128 (Total Revenue 12,255,016 14,300,536 0,045,520 Expenditures Current General government Town Council 81,983 82,457 (474) Town Clerk 275,132 257,944 17,188 Magistrate Court 347,338 342,104 5,234 Town Manager 243,401 223,991 19,410 Finance 334,793 311,615 23,178 Legal 459,809 414,925 44,884 Planning and Zoning 971,541 882,902 88,639 General Administration 9,564,634 787,285 8,777,349 Custodial Facility Maintenance 146,752 130,130 16,622 Economic Development 313,249 285,626 27,623 Community Development Administration 298,440 245,615 52,825 Human Resources 180 327 163,167 17,160 Total General government 13 217 399 4.127,761 9,089,638 Public safety Police 5,583,467 5,312,532 270,935 Building safety 934,772 804,253 130,519 Total Public safety 6,518,239 6,116,785 401,454 Culture and recreation Parks and Recreation 849,292 637,084 212,208 Total Culture and recreation 849,292 637 084 212,208 Cgrierre p2I�;5881 X9.703,300` Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (8,329,914) 3,418,906 11,748,820 Other financing sources(uses) Operating transfers out (1,901,810) (1,616,810) 285,000 Proceeds from sale of bonds 2,700,000 - (2,700,000) Total other financing sources(uses) 798,190 (1,616,810) (2,415,000) xcess of revenues and other sources • - under ex•enditures and other use (7,531,724) C-170-27076D 9,333,820 Fund balance be l inning of year 7,531,724 - 1,332,281 and ba ance,end of year $ - $ 10,666,101 $ 10,666.101 36 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA RF FtiN.:ID STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE- BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues Intergovernmental $ 1,629,000 $ 1,708,258 $ 79,258 Licenses and permits 15,400 17,278 1,878 Charges for services 4,400 7,314 2,914 Interest 50,000 123,541 73,541 Other 1,000 19,402 (rota' Revenue 1,699,800 1,875,793 175 993 Expenditures Current Highways and streets 3,606,038 1,655,709 1,950,329 Total Expenditures 3,606,038 1,655,709 1,950,329 Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (1,906,238) 220,084 2,126,322 Fund balance,beginning of year 1,832,378 1,983,892 151,514 Re idyl euit transfers 73,860 (2,316) and balance,end o year $ - , 2,275,520 $ 2,275,520 40 T , ALO RO VALLEY,ARIZONA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FUN STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE- BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues Intergovernmental $ 167,000 $ 252,645 $ 85,645 Charges for services 12,000 19,822 7,822 Contributions and donations - 850 850 Interest 6,500 8,968 2,468 Total Revenues 185,500 282,285 96,785 Expenditures Current Highways and streets 259,653 199,437 60,216 Total Expenditures 259,653 199,437 60,216 Exc • revenues over un er x nures „.., (74,153) cF2,848 157,001 Fund balance,beginning of year 74,153 106,328 32,175 Fund balance,end of year $ - $ 189,176 $ 189,176 43 ro,. •WN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 4 OWN DE ROADWAY VE PM 1 v FEES F II STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE- BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues Intergovernmental $ - $ 470,000 $ 470,000 g1,747,213 440 213 Special assessments 1,307,000 Interest 270,000 386,498 116A98 Total Revenues 1,577,000 2,603,711 1,026,711 Expenditures Current Claims and judgements - 600,000 (600,000) (" p � CCital outla 7.005,238 ,608,70 ) 5,396,533 a Total ,796,533 xpen itures � ,7 005 238 2 208 705 4 Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (5,428,238) 395,006 5,823,244 Fund bala teginning of year 5,428,23 8 _6 ..___ •0 705,122 and balance,end of - $ - . 6,528.366 $ 6,528.366 61 0.AI ► • •.. •.►••.,. ' ' ALTERNATIVE WATER RESOURCES FUND_, STATEMENT OF REVEN ,EXP 1 DITURES AND CHA IN FUND BALANCE- BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues Special assessments $ 240,000 $ 600,726 $ 360,726 Interest 40,000 56,379 16,379 Total Revenues 280,000 657,105 377,105 Expenditures Capital outlay 1,003,680 137,300 866,380 Total Expenditures 1,003,680 137,300 866,380 Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (723,680) 519,805 1,243,485 Fund balance,beginning of year 723,680 807,339 83,659 Ec..1121fc_77-517 ,_ $ - C 327,144 $ 1,327,144 58 TOWN OF ORO V.: AWZALNI COO VALLEY WATER CONNECTION FEES T, STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPRES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE- BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues Special assessments $ 775,000 $ 738,737 $ (36,263) Interest - 71,282 71,282 Total Revenues 775,000 810,019 35,019 Expenditures Capital outlay 1,445,014 52,370 1,392,644 Debt service Interest and fiscal charges 73,289 27,697 45,592 Total Expenditures 1,518,303 80,067 1,43 8,236 Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (743,303) 729,952 1,473,255 Fund balance,beginning of year 743,303 429 432 (313,871) un• ba ance,ens o year $ - 1,159,38 $ 1,159,384 59 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS-ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 Lit)(.4.4 tiot I ki el(0 4 Enterprise Operating revenues Charges for sales and services $ 6,751,792 Total operating revenues 6,751,792 Operating expenses Costs of sales and services 3,081,964 Depreciation 1,260,171 Total operating expenses 4,342 135 Operating income 2,409,657 Nonoperating revenues(expenses) Interest revenue 438,276 Interest expense (1,627,675) Issuance costs (52,181) Other 49,323 Total nonoperating revenues(expenses) (1,192,257) ti--1,217,400� -Net income Retained earnings,beginning of year 1 011,862 Retained earnings,end of year $ 2 229 262 The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 10 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS-ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 j j L' 4l/ "'f r 1;4 , _ Enterprise INCREASE(DECREASE)IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash flows from operating activities Cash received from customers $ 5,818,335 Cash payments to employees for services (895,448) Cash payments to suppliers for goods/services (2,508,709) Nonoperating revenues 4 9,32 3 Customer deposits received 50,811 Net cash provided(used)by operating activities 2,514,312 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets (1,033,492) Principal paid on capital leases (11,257) Interest paid on capital leases (1,173) Principal paid on revenue bonds (395,000) Interest paid on revenue bonds (1,569,837) Net cash provided(used)for capital and related financing activities (3,010,759) Cash flows from investing activities Interest 414,284 Net cash provided by investing activities 414,284 Net increase(decrease)in cash and cash equivalents (82,163) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 8,625,849 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 8,543 686 RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS TO THE BALANCE SHEET Cash and investments per the balance sheet $ 3,889,474 Cash on deposit with paying agent 2,206,082 Restricted assets 2,448,130 Total $ 8,543,686 (Continued) The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 11 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES- BUDGET AND ACTUAL-ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 General Special Revenue Variance Variance Favorable Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues Taxes $ 4,962,000 $ 6,13 9,176 $ 1,177,176 $ - $ - $ - Intergovernmental 5,432,316 5,486,779 54,463 1,796,000 1,960,903 164,903 Fines and forfeitures 201,000 202,714 1,714 40,000 141,913 101,913 Licenses and permits 1,105,000 1,596,520 491,520 15,400 17,278 1,878 Charges for services 210,600 269,665 59,065 16,400 27,136 10,736 Rents and royalties 10,000 - (10,000) - - - Contributions and donations 1,000 8,397 7,397 - 850 850 Special assessments - - - - - - Interest 318,600 547,657 229,057 58,500 140,706 82,206 Other 14,500 49,628 35,128 1,000 19,402 18,402 Total Revenues 12,255,016 14,300,536 2,045,520 1,927,300 2,308,188 380,888 Expenditures Current General government 13,217,399 4,127,761 9,089,638 5,248 279 4,969 Public safety 6,518,239 6,116,785 401,454 126,705 99,605 27,100 Highways and streets - - - 3,865,691 1,855,146 2,010,545 Culture and recreation 849,292 637,084 212,208 - - - Claims and judgements - - - - - - Capital Outlay - - - - - - Debt service Principal retirement - - - - - - Interest and fiscal charges - - - - - - Total Expenditures 20,584,930 10,881,630 9,703,300 3,997,644 1,955,030 2,042,614 Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (8,329,914) 3,418,906 11,748,820 (2,070,344) 353,158 2,423,502 Other financing sources(uses) Operating transfers in - - - - - - Operating transfers out (1,901,810) (1,616,810) 285,000 - - - Proceeds from sale of bonds 2,700,000 - (2,700,000) - - - Total other financing sources(uses) 798,190 (1,616,810) (2,415,000) - - - Excess of revenues and other sources over(under)expenditures and other uses (7,531,724) 1,802,096 9,333,820 (2,070,344) 353,158 2,423,502 Fund balance,beginning of year 7,531,724 8,864,005 1,332,281 1,996,484 2,247,875 251,391 Residual equity transfers - - - 73860 71,544 (2,316) Fund balance,end of year $ - $10,666,101 $10,666,101 $ - $ 2.672 577 $ 2,672,577 The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 8 Debt Service Capital Projects Variance Variance Favorable Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - - - - 3,250,000 1,720,000 (1,530,000) 15,307 3,138 (12,169) 2,322,000 3,086,676 764,676 4,563 14,000 9,437 310,000 580,359 270,359 100 6 (94) - - - 19,970 17,144 (2,826) 5,882,000 5,387035 (494,965) - - - - 600,000 (600,000) - - - 17,446,008 5,537,058 11,908,950 475,000 480,000 (5,000) - - - 357,529 328,085 29,444 73,289 27,697 45,592 832,529 808,085 24,444 17,519,297 6,164,755 11,354,542 (812,559) (790,941) 21,618 (11,637,297) (777,720) 10,859,577 699,554 699,554 - 917,256 917,256 - - - - 2,000,000 - (2,000,000) 699,554 699,554 - 2,917,256 917,256 (2,000,000) (113,005) (91,387) 21,618 (8,720,041) 139,536 8,859,577 186,865 363,767 176,902 8,720,041 9,097,784 377,743 (73,860) (71,544) 2,316 - - - $ - $ 200 836 $ 200,836 $ - $ 9,237,320 $ 9,237,320 The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 9 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET-ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS • AS OF JUNE 30,2000 Proprietary Governmental Fund Types Fund Type Special Debt Capital General Revenue Service Projects Enterprise Assets and Other Debits Assets Cash and investments $ 9,459,925 $ 3,779,717 $ 166,600 $10,440,569 $ 3,889,474 Cash on deposit with paying agent - - 296,865 366,195 2,206,082 Restricted assets - - - - 2,448,130 Accounts receivable 163,807 - - 61,514 875,968 Taxes receivable 510,564 - - - - Intergovernmental receivable 391,832 177,087 - - - Interest receivable 65,014 21,283 2,478 63,553 46,268 Due from other funds 820,390 7,784 - - - Prepaid items 11,750 - - - 36 Advances to other funds 469,221 - - - - Deferred charges - - - - 895,047 Fixed assets(net,where applicable, - - - - 26 113 246 of accumulated depreciation) > Other Debits Amount available in debt service fund - - - - - Amount to be provided for retirement of general long-term debt - - - - - Total Assets And Other Debits $11,892,503 $ 3 985 871 $ 465 943 $10,931,831 $36, 474.251 Liabilities,Equity and Other Credits Liabilities Accounts payable $ 267,714 $ 39,550 $ - $ 306,013 $ 181,561 Accrued wages and benefits 669,726 50,306 - 4,010 22,162 Claims payable - - - 600,000 - Interest payable - - - - 806,683 Intergovernmental payable 21,543 168 - 3,876 29,493 Due to other funds 7,784 258,773 265,107 296,510 - Customer deposits 99,982 763,135 - 4,688 160,190 Deferred revenue 159,653 5,661 - 10,193 - Compensated absences payable - - - - 29,258 Capital leases payable - - - - 11,915 Advances from other funds - - - 469,221 - Revenue bonds payable - - - - 30,414,029 Certificates of participation - - - - - Total Liabilities 1,226,402 1,117,593 265,107 1,694,511 31,655,291 Equity and Other Credits Investment in general fixed assets - - - - - Contributed capital - - - - 2,589,698 Retained earnings Unreserved - - - - 2,229,262 Fund balances Reserved for preaid items 11,750 - - - - Reserved for advances 469,221 - - - - Unreserved,designated for unemployment benefits 195,312 25,135 - - - Unreserved,undesignated 9,989,818 2,843,143 200,836 9,237,320 - Total Equity and Other Credits 10,666,101 2,868,278 200,836 9,237,320 4,818,960 Total Liabilities,Equity and Other Credits $11,892,503 $ 3,985,871 $ 465,943 $10,931,831 $36,4741 The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 4 Account Groups Totals General General (Memorandum Fixed Assets Long-term Debt Only) $ - $ - $27,736,285 - 2,869,142 - - 2,448,130 _ - 1,101,289 - - 510,564 - - 568,919 - - 198,596 - 828,174 - - 11,786 - - 469,221 - - 895,047 20,099,037 - 46,212,283 - 200,836 200,836 - 6,096,945 6,096,945 $20,099,037 $ 6,297,781 $90,147,217 $ - $ - $ 794,838 - - 746,204 - - 600,000 - - 806,683 - - 55,080 - - 828,174 - - 1,027,995 - - 175,507 - 29,258 - 17,781 29,696 - - 469,221 - 1,625,000 32,039,029 - 4,655,000 4,655,000 - 6,297,781 42,256,685 20,099,037 - 20,099,037 - - 2,589,698 - - 2,229,262 - - 11,750 - - 469,221 - - 220,447 - - 22,271,117 20,099,037 - 47,890,532 $20,099,037 $ 6 297 781 $90 147 217 The accompanying notes to fianacial statements are an integral part of this statement. 5 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA REPORT ON EXAMINATION OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURE LIMITATION REPORT FISCAL PEAR ENDED .TITHE 30, 2000 • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA • TABLE OF CONTENTS FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 Contents Page Independent Auditor's Report 1 Annual Expenditure Limitation Report- Part I 2 Annual Expenditure Limitation Report -Part II 3 Annual Expenditure Limitation Report -Reconciliation 4 Notes to Annual Expenditure Limitation Report 5 1 CRONSTROM 8. TRBOVICH CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT The Auditor General of the State of Arizona and the Honorable Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona We have audited the accompanying Annual Expenditure Limitation Report of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, for the year ended June 30, 2000. This report is the responsibility of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the report is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the report. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall report presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. The accompanying Annual Expenditure Limitation Report was prepared for the purpose of complying with the uniform expenditure reporting system as discussed in Note 1, and is not intended to be a presentation in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In our opinion, the Annual Expenditure Limitation Report of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, for the year ended June 30, 2000, referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the information required by the uniform expenditure reporting system on the basis of accounting described in Note 1. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Town and filing with the Auditor General of the State of Arizona and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. eAtilAditineVqt6151TILCAN ?C. Cronstrom & Trbovich, P.C. September 8, 2000 1 8706 EAST MANZANITA DRIVE,SUITE 100 • SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85258 • (480) 348-1102 • FAX (480) 348-1104 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA ANNUAL EXPENDITURE LIMITATION REPORT-PART I YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 1. EEC Expenditure Limitation $ 2. Voter-approved alternative expenditure limitation 61,930,206 3. Enter amount from line 1 or 2 61,930,206 4. Amount subject to expenditure limitation(total amount form Part II,line C) 25,958,251 5. Board-authorized expenditures necessitated by a disaster declared by the Governor and not approved by the voters (Art.IX,20[2][a],Arizona Constitution) 6. Board-authorized expenditures necessitated by a disaster not declared by the Governor and approved by the voters (Art.IX,20[2][b],Arizona Constitution) 7. Prior-year voter approval of expenditures to exceed expenditure limitation for reporting fiscal year(Art.IX,20[2][c], Arizona Constitution) 8. Subtotal 25,958,251 9. Board-authorized excess expenditures for the previous fiscal year not approved by the voters (Art.IX,20[2][b],Arizona Constitution). 10. Total adjusted amount subject to the expenditure limitation 25,958,251 11. Amount under(in excess of)the expenditure limitation(If excess expenditures are reported,provide an explanation) $ 35,971,955 I hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the information contained in this report is accurate and in accordance with the requirements of the uniform expenditure reporting Signature of Chief Fiscal Officer: 2).G.,,-,r,f1• et ,A2n Name and Title: David L.Andrews,Finance Director Telephone No: (520)297-2591 Date: September 8,2000 2 Y ,— 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -. N N N r o0 00 c0 v, 0 a, irisw N N 6REA .,a. N s 0 L ..,,g0O 00 • /C `— 44 w tis v -a LL = QS fA WI e in lel S r... U • 3 w tX Vti°` w .c .o Q a Z Ngo aZ_ o 0 o w w w .2) .0 0 0000 0 a) 2 v) 0. = .... ,.., aQ ,,, ._, w - . 0 4,9 *IA Z o a w O c4 Z o o L4 0 }' U o v v, 4 CA_ Q 0 I o M VD73 M C''.. U C 00 0000 00 0 w v 4 c O ,..r C .� _ 0 tar L /'� U +�+ U C O v = N i 15 C C U - - '' ! 1 : C x C ° OG O U U U Rs H co j •• OO •• U U . O p O U 'C _ c P.„ -v o O . eii C y .2 w as > •CN = .o U Com) _ a) N N E y 00 2 ' x tas n.., U -p r..1 U C wo w C ° 6 .0 .o OL z* cC K r C C cv •- > O, S L U 0U U Ux cd v C > .0 5 0 22p o U E .. C C - ., U eo e* :o U E C H U L.,. U U '7o v' U i C U eC C •> = 6. U O. 00 cn L . •^i p c UL •g aVCci c-1 '' U •U ,c c� c .U 00= .O -d U 7i Tc" '.2 c0 -o C C g .; •2 a. o z•� 6. o o .� • t oa c F3 ,E et* > ° g c >, t • v; t t,.., 2 xC0. c c x „ a) - cae.) — na) ; :o cc , c 3 "s ;— .o > ?, V •r.. po o aN -p o0 "' v :: y a� vE c a> > - = = e� p s - ai . U = C ° '�a po ° o C s '° ? = c° O O '- C C ,... oa `n CU O - • ' E� :''' ° CL)j ° . '' caao •c etb - p Ca QCZ0 a. 0 0 E` C., ( < o,< _ ° = — C.) v � L > .- aE- Q o --• N eh �t • N M 4 t/'' vi, N 00 O; Cd CV f i ^. .-r 1 .....00 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 C4 h v 1 1 O kr)O 00 eh N00 N • 7ti —. c:5 N N O eel eh i0 0 .11 0Mo N eh V• o v G;� E— v, N N 6H 4 ... . O C,1 en � v� r•O '1= O N N_ ‘c5'N O; 00 0 en en Tt = wve, el .-+ ,,p w 69 1 1 ti b ig . 6A 4 Z In 1 0 iii .,-- V rt w 'o V z o w6A 49 Q• ci4 1 N• E-' o Y R O N In , ' 0o0 00o 0 w a) c o 00 Q a v LI Ca 6A 4, O - w O 1.4 � . 1 1 O• 5w o n� o E.• Z o �( au c oo;, IL) Q 69 6R Q0 eel 1 0 M '0 ice. -a .-. 00 00 CU cy 00 O 0 0 69 4 b0 fl ! 1 -pCA cC = Rd U E Iz -O O 6 O X cC OtX '7 al• ° -C ° OO a. camc = 0 O sN . cy -d a c en c.. o .cl O C 2 --5- "0 C -v._ C c° -b 2 03 L.. O .0 E.") ... a) N V = I.zO O 'C = w 0 K. wsc ,ON ° yc c svo cn .� c V. w 5 -p t cr t. .• 0 - .= c0 i ° at V as O F i0 ° •�L ° O LL e� to .O O ... -t7 N 3 a. O F ° t/� �' .. ° -0 M. C V .0 w 4.. C cE.'3 rd c 1 c B v— ° -° -r 0, .. ecs -�a. o o •a Q4`. - 0Q jjjJjiiJ -fluitIIJflJ - E- Q N M 4 iti 'IO 5 00 N e•-; v N aj L,j TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA • NOTES TO ANNUAL EXPENDITURE LIMITATION REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Annual Expenditure Limitation Report (AELR) is presented on the basis of accounting prescribed by the uniform expenditure reporting system (VERS), as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §41-1279.07, and in accordance with the voter- approved alternative expenditure limitation plan adopted March 10, 1998, as authorized by the Arizona Constitution, Article IX, §20 (9). 5 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA SINGLE AUDIT ACT REPORTS FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA TABLE OF CONTENTS FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 Page Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 1 Report on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to each Major Program and Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 3 Summary of Auditor's Results 5 Financial Statement Findings 6 Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 6 Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings 6 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 7 CRONSTROM 8. TRBOVICH CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS REPORT ON COMPLIANCE AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS The Honorable Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona We have audited the financial statements of the Town of Oro Valley as of and for the year ended June 30, 2000, and have issued our report thereon dated September 8, 2000. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Town's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Town's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, we noted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we have reported to management of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona in a separate letter dated September 8, 2000. 1 8706 EAST MANZANITA DRIVE,SUITE 100 ■ SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85258 • (480) 348-1 102 • FAX (480) 348-1104 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION i This report is intended solely for the information and use of the members of the Arizona State Legislature, the Auditor General of the State of Arizona, the Town Council, federal awarding agencies, and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. OA elAoatA-OW\I 4-6tart-aA FG. Cronstrom & Trbovich, P.C. September 8, 2000 2 CRONSTROM 8. TRBOVICH CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 The Honorable Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona We have audited the compliance of the Town of Oro Valley with the types of compliance requirements described in the U. S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2000. The Town's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to each of its major federal programs is the responsibility of the Town's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Town's compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Town's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination on the Town's compliance with those requirements. In our opinion, the Town complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2000. The management of the Town is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Town's internal control over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. 3 8706 EAST MANZANITA DRIVE,SUITE 100 • SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85258 • (480) 348-1 102 • FAX (480) 348-1 104 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Our consideration of the internal control over compliance would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that noncompliance with applicable requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants that would be material in relation to a major federal program being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over compliance and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, we noted certain immaterial instances of noncompliance that we reported to management of the Town of Oro Valley in a separate letter dated September 8, 2000. We have audited the general-purpose financial statements of the Town as of and for the year ended June 30, 2000, and have issued our report thereon dated September 8, 2000. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general-purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by OMB Circular A-133 and is not a required part of the general-purpose financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general-purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the general-purpose financial statements taken as a whole. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the members of the Arizona State Legislature, the Auditor General of the State of Arizona, the Town Council, federal awarding agencies, and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. e/t AkAltAZ1 - ‘Abt-DiCA) . Cronstrom & Trbovich, P.C. September 8, 2000 4 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA • SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 SECTION I - SUMMARY OF AUDITOR'S RESULTS Financial Statements Type of auditor's report issued: Unqualified Internal control over financial reporting: • Material weakness(es) identified? yes X no • Reportable condition(s) identified not considered to be material weaknesses? yes X none reported • Noncompliance material to financial yes X no statements noted? Federal Awards Internal Control over major programs: • Material weakness(es) identified? yes X no • Reportable condition(s) identified not considered to be material weaknesses? yes X none reported Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major programs: Unqualified Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with Circular A-133, Section .510(a)? yes X no Identification of major programs: CFDA Number(s) Name of Federal Program or Cluster 16.592 U.S. Department of Justice - COPS FAST Dollar threshold used to distinguish between Type A and Type B programs: $300,000 Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee? X yes no 5 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 SECTION II FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS No matters reported. SECTION III FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS No matters reported. SECTION IV SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS There were no prior audit findings. 6 1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA k.. SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 Federal Pass-through CFDA Grantor's Grantor Agency Number Number Revenues Expenditures U.S.Department of Justice COPS FAST 16.592 N/A $ 405,703 $ 405,703 DEA 16.Unknown N/A 8,458 8,458 Passed through the City of Tucson: High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area(HIDTA) 16.579 092-2167 71,972 71,972 Passed through Pima County Metropolitan Area Narcotics Trafficking Interdiction Squads(MANTIS) 16.579 092-2180 61,252 61,252 Total U.S.Department of Justice 547,385 547,385 U.S.Department of Transportation Governor's Office of Highway Safety(GOHS) 20.217 N/A 26,000 26,000 TOTAL FEDERAL AWARDS $ 573,385 $ 573,385 (1) This schedule was prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. 7 I) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 0 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 ths. TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING — APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER, SERIES 09 LIQUOR LICENSE — FRY'S FOOD & DRUG STORE, #117 LOCATED AT 10450 N. LA CANADA DRIVE SUMMARY: An application for a Person Transfer Series 09 Liquor License for Mr. Stephen McKinney has been submitted by Fry's Food & Drug Store#117 located at 10450 N. La Canada Drive. In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was posted for 20 days commencing October 25, 2000 on the premises of the applicant's property. No protests were received during that time. Chief Sharp has conducted a background investigation on the applicant. He has found no derogatory • 'formation on the applicant, therefore, he has no objections to the approval of the Person Transfer of the Series Olio. ) Liquor License. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memorandum from Police Department 2. Liquor License Application 3. License Description from AZ Department of Liquor Licenses SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the request for a Series 09 person transfer liquor license at Fry's Food & Drug Store#117, located at 10450 N. La Canada Drive. C' ,.. , , ' De-. = tHe.d or r Town Manager t..EY ,ecre 0-4 yY ito 2 11000 N. La Canada Dr. t� fGIICI ` `� _ ♦ Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 M Phone (520) 229-4900 FAX (520) 797-2616 DANIEL G. SHARP Chief of Police7410 Q.s www.ovpd.org A A - 1417 x 2. `t °6N DE 9 ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT "INTEGRITY, PRIDE, EXCELLENCE" To: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk FROM- 4,1! lel G. Sharp, Chief of Police I RE: Background Investigation, Person Transfer of Liquor License Smith's Food & Drug Centers,Inc. Fry's Food & Drug#117 10450 N. La Canada Dr. Date: November 2, 2000 On 11/02/2000, the Oro Valley Police Department completed the standard background check on Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc., Fry's Food & Drug#117, principals, Kenneth Thrasher, Paul W. Heldman, Michael Donnelly, and Stephen Michael McKinney. Background checks were queried through Pima County, State of Arizona, and the National Crime Information Center. The Individuals listed on the application have no felony records on file with the listed informational, and records systems. The Oro Valley Police Department has no objection to the transfer of Liquor License from Michael J. Donnelly to Stephen Michael McKinney. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES_& .CONTAO,L4J- .,,• , . -- „. ; 800 W Washington 5th Floor '� -� ; i � QQ*/ Coness #150 • _ Tucson AZ 85701-1352 Phoenix AZ 85007-2934 4. �'' • 5202 42-5141 , ZU f(, ) 628-6595 (60 ) 5 { I pi- APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE TYPE OR PRINT WITH BLACK INK Notice: Effective Nov.1,1997,All Owners,Agents,Partners,Stockholders,Officers.or Managers actively involved in the day to day operations of the business must attend a Department approved liquor law training course or provide proof of attendance within the last five years. See page 5 of the Liquor Licensing requirements. SECTION 1 This application is for a: SECTION 2 Type of ownership: ELINTEREVIP Complete Section 5 ❑J.T.W.R.O.S. Complete Section 6 ❑ NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2,3,4,13,14,15,16, 17 0 INDIVIDUAL Complete Section 6 . 121 PERSON TRANSFER(Bars&Liquor Stores ONLY) 0 PARTNERSHIP Complete Section 6 Complete Sections 2,3,4,11,13,15, 16,17 0 CORPORATION Complete Section 7 0 LOCATION TRANSFER(Bars and Liquor Stores ONLY) ❑La=LIABILITY CO. Complete Section 7 Complete Sections 2,3,4,12,13,15,16, 17 0 CLUB Complete Section 8 ❑PROBA ASSIGNMENT/DIVORCE DECREE 0 GOVERNMENT Complete Section 10 Complete Sections 2,3,4,9,13,15,17(fee not required) 0 TRUST Complete Section 6 ❑GOVERNMENT Complete Sections,3,4,10,13, 15, 16,17 0 OTHER Explain SECTION 3 Type of license and fees: LICENSE#: 9100012 1. Type of License: Series 09 2.Total fees attached: S PPLI CA TION FEE AND INTERIM PERMIT FEES (IF AP SLI CAB .F)ARE NOT REFLINDAB L r:. A service fee of 25.CO will be chargedfcr nil dishcncrad &.ecks (A.R.S. 44.6 52) L CTION 4 Applicant:(A11 applicants:est complete this section) 401g-in Nir. I. Applicant/Agent's Name:Ms. McKinney & ,yen Michael (Insert one name ONLY to appear on license) Last First Middle 2. Cor .IParmershi fLL.C.: Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc. i? cccTo (Exactly as it appears an Articles of Inc.or Articles of Org.) 3. Business Name: Fry's Food & Drug #117 (Exactly as it appears on the exterior of premises) \C.)00r-8 4. Business Address: 10450 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley Pima 85737 (Do not use PO Box Number) City COUNTY Zip 5. Business Phone: (. (529) 877-9207 Residence Phone: ( ) 6. Is the business located within the incorporated limits of the above city or town? EYES ONO 7. Mailing Address: PO Box 6016 Phoenix AZ 85005 Mailing City State Zip 8. Enter the amount paid for a 06,07,or 09 license: $ (Price of License ONLY) DEPARTMENT USE ONLY • 1 to Date: .� �� Lic.#Accepted b ._ ..�.1000a.,. Fees: ) CO -- Is c s Application Intern Permit Agent Change Club F. Prints TOTAL PRCC.SSING APPLICATIONS TAIC3 3 APPnO IMATELY 90 DAYS,.�`1D RCUMSTANC S,O=1 ESCL T IN A LCNGER WAJTI G?52:CD. You ARE CAIMCNED REGARDING PIANS FOR A GRAND OPENING,E i•C.,3E7CRE:T`IAL.LL P EC'YAI.AND ISS124-k►fCE CF LIC 0100 0511999 *Disabled individsinis requiring special accommodation, please call the Department. • ;ECTION 5 Interim Permit too rate business whileyour application is pending you will need an Interim Permit pursuant to A.R.S.4-203.01. . If you intendpe PP . There MUST be a valid license of the same type you are applying for currently issued to the location. . Enter the license number currently at the location. CO 10 0 012 .. Is the license currently in use? E YES 0 NO If no,how long has it been out of use? k.TTACH THE LICENSE CURRENTLY ISSUED AT THE LOCATION TO THIS APPLICATION. JOHN V. BERRY ,declare that I am the CURRENT LICENSEE of the stated license and (Print full name) .ocation. I have read this application and the contents and all statements are true,correct and complete.• , '° of �.-,. State of�. I - ����.�� County ,, ‘.----------"-7The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me tiffs (Signature) CiLL C:-:' /} 2j a'( ` I d.ay of /016/,; A � :-r- , A-� 1_,r- Day of 1 th Month Year ,,fj�, OFFICIAL SEAL 1 ; ..�`'� t-.! D I >/:‘"\\/.,7,edet7;) My commission ex 1.::"W:, Irl ►. . - - (Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC) ti'" MARICOPA COUNTY i � My Comm.Expires,lune 25,2003 -��...was�re���+�o+�wu�orr r.r�s.w.r�rr SECTION 6 Individual or Partnership Owners: EACH PERSON LIS ' MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETED FORM "LIC0101", AN "APPLICANT" TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, AND $24 FEE FOR EA"' CARD. 1. Individual: Last First Middle %Owned Residence Address City State Zip % Partnership Name: (Only the first partner listed will appear on lic-'.e) General-Limited Last First Middle %Owned Residence Address City State Zi. r ❑ ® % D ❑ .. (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) 2. Is anyperson,other than the above,going to share in the profits/losses of the business? 0 YES 0 NO 2 � 1 I SECTION 12 Location to Location Transfer: (Bars and Liquor Stores°Ni APPLICANTS CANNOT OPERATE UNDER A LOCATION TRANSFER UNTIL IT IS APPROVED Y THE STATE_ Current Business Name and Address: 1xactly as it appears on license) 2. New Business Name and Address: - (Do not use PO Box Number) 3. License Type: License Number. Last Renewal Date: 4. What date do you plan to move? What date do you plan to open? SECTION 13 Questions for all in-state applicants: 1. Distance to nearest school: 5280 ft. Name/Address of school: COPPER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (regardless of distance) 11620 N SPRINGCOPPER t! /24 t7 2. Distance*nearest church: 10560 ft. Name/Address of church: CASA ADOBES BA P T I ST (regardless of distance) 10801 N. LA CHOLLA A Tam the: ❑LESSEE 0 SUBLESSEE ®OWNER 0 PURCHASER(of premises) 4. the premises is leased give lessors name and address: 4a. Monthly rental/lease rate$ . What is the remaining length of the lease? yrs. mos. 4b. What is the penalty if the lease is not fulfilled? $ or other (give details-attach additional sheet if necessary) 5. What is the total business indebtedness of the applicant for this license/location excluding lease? $ -0- Does any one creditor represent more than 10%of that sum? 0 YES ®NO If yes,list below. Total must equal 100%. Last n¢ First Middle %Owed Reside-1m Adds s City State T (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) Supermarket Liquor Department 6. what type of business will this license be used for?(BE SPEcazic) 7. Has a license,or a transfer license for the premises on this application been denied by the state within the past one(1)year? ❑ YES Igi NO If yes,attach explanation. 8 les any spirituous liquor manufacturer,wholesaler,or employee,have any interest in your business? DYES Fi NO 9. is the premises currently licensed with a liquor license? i1 YES 0 NO If yes,give license number and licensee's name: # 09100012 (Exactly as it appears on license) JOHN V. BERRY / SMI TTYS SUPER VALU INC 5 ►ECTION 14 Restaurant,or Hotel-Motel Applicants: 4/ ' • , . or hotel-motel license at the proposed location? 0 % NO If yes,give licensee's name: Is there a valid restaurant and license#: Last First 1Vlddle • • for an Ince 'i °ermit to operate while your application is pending,consult . If the answer to Question 1 is YES,you may qualify - A.R.S.Section 4-203.01;and complete Section 5 of this appli tion. .. All restaurant applicants must complete a Restaurant• ,• ation Plan(Form LIC0114)provided by the Department of Liquor. ��:� venue must be from food sales? 0 YES 0 NO 1.. Do you understand that 40% of your annual g re Premises: (Blueprints not accepted, diagram must be on this form) �ECTiON 15 Diagram of 1. Check ALL boxes that apply to your licensed premises: Entrances/Exits 14 Liquor storage areas . ❑ Drive-in windows 0 Patio enclosures ❑ Service windows 0 Under construction:estimated completion date 2. Restaurants and Hotel/Motel applicants must explicitly depict kitchen equipment and dining facilities. • onlyarea where spirituous liquor is to be sold,served,consumed,dispensed,possessed,or stored. 3. The diagram below is the Give the square footage or outside dimensions of the licensed premises. DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS,LIVING QUARTERS,ETC. i ,--1- ', T...: \ I i . 1=1... A1114 t , CD EAU'S& ta 1 lir 1 I it 1111!ir %N\1)2-- Irr41111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110s 0210 I ir li IC r 5614-141-je--- a...., i I r ti -' �i -- _ _ T... _ = ;� .... It,a, ii iii .. •�I.c tam .—' Ili 7. { T ii. •fir . 1� ' rC 1 , I ,a r 1- 1 I : i____-1. 1 ti I rt ill ill ; ' 1 n 1 11 e ,i, ,,„, • i , ..r pi., c_ t _ ,. i I �` ' t l mi___...,,,, ice■ 0. ! �... y� Ei � tf � „,,,,,, • . 2 , • a - . S i 1 - --.1lit ' ' :I if /,. - - ' : . ,II -- - Ili --`•2 I , ,,,, in i,.......—,-1 ... % _ D _ ..., 11 '�:. ��� -. f -� S? 'I r. , L. -41 ,,, it il) °Ill " a ' 1 1 L - .. 1 .::.:•— • d . Itiill /A 1 , 1u�!Sr'.■.L — , i ■ .l_--r 1 1 :- - Il it ■am■- in�� I .....,...1..--, ,. 1 i apik r.„, ,piviiIrgoirm.----, t. . . ..., ,.. ! iikii;,.!,, . Ifiwohar. .__L.- ,. :. . , ..,.--...,,yr it.icy in•iii..- -- • .. . ---CO I 0 Ull 0 dil NI ob 6 ri E5 . 2 IR'1JM1 •R1W�... Cr,4.1,00.1Ce Sigftit - ::-....,-: YOU_ _ MUST NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR, OF ANY CHANGES OF BOUNDARaL. ENTRANCES, EXITS, OR SERVICE WINDOWS MADE AFTER SUBMISSION OF THIS DIAGRAM. 6 • SECTION 16 Geographical Data: A SAMPLE FOR THIS SECTION IS PROVIDED ON THE BACK OF THIS PAGE. ' below the exact names of all churches,schools,and spirituous liquor outlets within a one half mile radius of your proposed location. 1. EL BURRITO RESTURANT 2. DIAMOND SHAMROCK NT 3 L 4• 5. A N 6. • A D 7• A 8. 9. A LAMBERT LN 10. 21 11. - 12. 13. 14. (ti 1 TACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) A=Your business name and identify cross streets. SECTION 17 Signature Block: I, kkli bbor‘e ,declare that: 1)I am the APPLICANT(Agent/Club Member/Partner),making this (Print name of APPLICANT/AGENT listed in Section 4 Question ) application;2)I have read the application and the contents and all statements are true,correct and complete;3)that this application is not being made to defraud or injure any creditor, taxing authority,regulatory authority,or transferor;4)that no other person,firm, or corporation,except as indicated, has an interest in the spirituous liquor license for which these statements are made; and 5) that none of the owners, partners, members, cers dire t• . e. _ e olders listed have been convicted of a felony in the past five(5)years. • (7Stat of Ae-/Z-4)fiiIRe Countyof /; /19/2/(7-eP/11 X j The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (sib ,..-) A_ . z da of GSC MELISSA G. OOPER of' onto •- f onrh Year t Public-Slate of Mona ..,..' Nota y Mycommission expires on: :r _� ARICP COQ (Signature of NO 'Y PUBLIC) 7 -,-.-,..7..T. .<:.;.:::::, ,,,,,,;;;;;,,,;•..........goig.:..,..e..v.,0,,,;;;•0_,.'-.11.iiiib,,,,p-,,,.• .,.:al-,,, .... ,______-,,,...v...... .:;.:,:snp,s:..........,o,,,.........:J;,,pllp--:.=:,,.k.!'...:0Y,'•-mw..:-..11;',"'''',it'sg,',=::::: .,..,.,-..-....-. .....:.,„,„,......:.v.:4::.,...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,k,....,,,„..;-1*:A.e...4.,fp.,,-:-,.4-%4R,,,,,,,,,,,,,--,-,--......,-..,'.., i4,..-. '.....,z.•,''-..,,,,---.:*:' ...:, 5,,,,,,.............:...:....,,,,,..........,...,,,,,..1g,..„.„.,,,,,,o,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,---')-1"--,w,,,,,,,ohl."--,,,,70:',f0-' '11,1 A.: %I, - • i,,,' 0...; .•..,,:,--#,:iii, .;;;;;;-;;,,,,,.. „,,ipgigif;,.....,.,;,;,;,,,,,,,,.....1.2*.ti*,:,.........":::;?,,,-...,:,,iw,,,::$11.„;,.;,,,,if,4%. ,;./..:.;&A.,,,,,,b,.:.-,g, ......1,...--..., -%.,-._.1:41,1........• ..:' ",----: :14,. ,Ii',-;--,-,-a: ,,,-;,,,".*,;::::Z.t.ti.,,,iiitill);Plikiii•;;„:;„$;,:iiiti,!!ftpArgk,;1Fi?.;;;;;1,3', 41.4:;:":"-':::illiii... *::--'PP.ot=•,.:, :igilli::-.1ilittiiii.:::g.`:;df4s.'40.1b4.:t, 0:-::;;;;;;.,i1P';10.Vitst4.:,..;:::;:,;.:.:,'$?;;"Allii.•,%."7::'.114.1111..j'''''ti!...A'''''''''-..1111,.'''''''Wiltr It4.4)-..6'i'i0....7:',11,41,:,:_:j'.'1,e.;411$0:111),..7''''';:*-',.'',.iileft7;';';?;.;;P;...5g:t1,!1.-'2'-::7'-'-.,-.-1'40174.:::::**'1%';': .ri'------ '‘" ';,v,vicee ii:.F.14:44 •;$$-'-i...i''' .."::::4:=Eriii,",,;,,,,4111'4;.•‘‘,'0:'''''.....iv..,,ii,VAr:;4-$-b -,.,$•;:;:ivil,..'5,5,...... ..iiiiii.:.4.....,.-:........,'4Aiiiii1:•.:":",--4''''.',.!.' '-,':.,:',--,:--.'...•.-'.':il'":!-P'.:f",`?''''''''".-='"'"-- ' '.V4W.W7.417RoWsZVAW.G.GS.W.G.G.G,Rt...--1,_, 7.11.7.,,,,t.;;;:.,•,:t-A:::: t'..:-- -•",''...ir-', -(g.f4•:'';',..,s';'.v.i.-'.7%,.,..,.:-,q,';':';;::::::::,,:. ;:,..Att....1.1),-,,--41,1--. ...>;!.:..4,,,,44,k;,,iit'i;:w.;--;,... ;.:-_,,i ;-,..z:....:i.-- ,.,.,,--,,,•-" ,v,,,,,,,,,,vG,vivii...V.07...702a.•••• ' -'f.Frf,,K.,, ---,,,.';`,,z.--..{iiiipii., .,!.,?..0...1;.:):'',.1,1',.',...'4I0:1-i, ;:i,,,;:iii,,,d1,,,,;v11:-; '-'.,-',..---...-_ r:...;ift.',.....i.e,.....,... ..',';,• ''---`' - ,,,,,,,,,v,vGG,,,awaGG:GGG9-••--• ,___,.•.:(6▪,:.. ..,., .., ',.., '..•Ak7.1. :9.4.V.G.G,GGA.V.G&G.G.437.17.G...s7.G.Z.V.G.G.G.G.G.457.62.057..V.R.V.W, _ ri., ..,,. . .-......,......,...,...., ,..4.-:1',X,-..-:?.•' , .;;.-'.4....., :' ,.,.,:,...:iii..,sk... ..j1:!,'. < ; rri P. ,1 P ).•..1 ..---lit., it .1.'• 51 .:,,,..-,.. tr--4.' ›. 0 CI) '-' i•k:i2..... ..,.. - •.-_,,,,....- -0,1",'S.,, .:.----.7...1,-• -,-4-ill'ii ,.- ,94 ,---.--,•:.-:, itr,I.:,,,,,, :,.. ..17::•11.": '4,.•.,. .....,, .:...ff;f:',.:6'-•,t7:-':,;.,-; .:, \ i ,i„:1;:ii!•.:: )"< > Ro ,,,'t 0 r.) Pmt ...,,, ....4....-r• i•:-27r• '$i='' 61i ..•svt". eiti‘.,-V :',.:.F.- •..,,,,,..?.....,-;_vir,,,.':.'1.1;.:,...."4.,,:-:72:4: ::.;': k% . . ...,?.;,:.... < tii p itiiiiia,,,tia,*: '.;31 a:. ..41,77'. ,-•\\I'‘-))1: i •ihtli .'-‘1.14::::%. : . ,_. .,,....,.., ..i. ..•......... •. .., ...,--,: -...,...t.s.7:1-....-,.. ......: ,s.:,... ... ,.. *4 L3 u, ,:, tr3 ;:.;.:1.41; •••=4:•.:;.,,,:" ki.:7-4.--"'"iiiii'*,...- ::;:r. Ei':,:::i..:::''. • W n_ ..:,,::;.1.i!';...::;..I..:;::1::,...fsl„.i....t'.:...:i:;.::Ltdir.:i:,r.,i,t.,:i,::':::.. ''•'• 1g: i 7:1;$11.111iii..7:10, 0 1111111.11111111111it i I:1:t.'i:',::Vi / „ (D ......:„.1...„.....4.......--s . : .,,:•,m,..,,.;•::,1,..,,..,:;.....,,,a;,.;.gi,„..1....,.: o -imk • ',.:il..,, - ... .,-..tt--,..„„.... 11...,.•;: . ,1 \(;1411.511" H a,,.... , ..:;:.......c... ti ,,..:7,:,.;.:,•,1,:::,:i::,.,... ---.. 0 ,... .,...... .......„. ._„?...,......„.„.,.,_:„..,., .,6;....,......„.„,..:.,,,,,:,.,,....„,.. Zi:',,4,:..i,:iiii,.,,. z (1) 0 ,. , -c/a .—...i. •,,,r4rik ,Z,isi-,,,--- w .......,....,.... .....,,„, .,.,......,. ''".u-j. 7.41 ,§-.1:',;':::.;;k•0:;,:lre"), •%NV -,,,N31:'-,,,.-:-.._ .: ,,',1 fit i:','?.:0•,../".".:*-7..7.:S: )-1 . '..4 i 141...:1.i-.1-,:i:1i:::i:.i::::1i•L0:i'H'P.H:•• fD) tt(ittl'r..:it:-:1::d'•ii4131:,•1,1.-,1.':1.:::..:l 1t1'1ni.T74:.,.•,:A:,*,,.,,„,g,,,,,,,,e,g.,.,.,.,i:,,g:v,,,,,",,.E,,..,,,,,,,.T.,t.P,.:-,5,-;,.„!)1,;..:1:....,.,."i:.,0:,T..:'....46.5,t 3. i_.T.r.i ssi ,.ii it-i:lF,lo•z.ri-iiii.•.:!:•7,..i:.,.-,;‘,4.,-..7...,.7:;Y:,::'.70.../.-.:.i...I..7....7--,.ii,..„oN..-7,_.:i,,:--::.::-,tffA.P•.,.rg,.,.-5i,-.,,i,i.,...,$-,i,i-,,7§A,i,5..,:4 ;:4-... ; o 3,1.;,„.i,i,.!•... ) ,i!..i .......1,,,,,,,.,:,,,-.:;.„.. ,-t ::::7":1::_.,,w:,51.;,'..e.,,1-- :4:,',-,:::(s\ c4 b*, voLgi,?:i ›. .- k:1-,..:I,L• • ,1 1 0 . (I) >01 ..::... )7771:-:1.i:..::::'- •.:::-.i'..-.';1-1 ;D!.°'.-i";E:14;1;33-4.1 -' ,>, ..s.,..: '.: -!. * ' .:•.•:-,.,..•i-)0 •.:....N t-,. i;',,,,k;,,--,_;*,:,E;:. ,.;:k:fif.•A*,7:4..:7:,: till '''''::'::.. .::'. Z ' a .ta,,.k, .7,,,,_4'.-•Vir: ...1 ta .s:'.:;7. 'P-41021.1IV 1.".:': . c."44i-;577'''' 4°: '4 ':.i'.:,:7?„.,:,2: i''...1:'''':•••''',.':.f:'§''::::'';'..... • 2 4.•:7 ',-.4. 61r::1 '') ' '.,!,.. , 4 4 © 0 a :-...„.7..i,s...,. ,. c :,,.,..,..,;...............,.....„.„„.:,,,..,,, ,..: iri ,,,„ , ,,3,2,. ,....• es,„„ :c, ..,......,.,•.,,,.:,: ,z. .• ..,„:....-,i- .,,,.....,.. -.-u 7, :t.1,..,,::,.,,,s,„-.:,,:: ''""j'."''':'''t'''''.::.:f14g itlio46,.'-• -'. gig,:,:!,..,:m„:,;4,:.4.i;:m.;:j.,i,i,..A.,,,a,:g,,,,,,,i;.4.,.:.,:a.0,,,ia!i„'.:iim:1,.:,,,,,r.:.::',:i, r.). ..„,,:,:::, . ::.,,:„,: iv ,,..,..,,.,,,,::„ ,,,,,,,. ...,t..., C) '---Ii .... Q:.• --,-,,..t.,.. t itit'Z-1:11411;:!,:•;.111:''. o. '''-' S 0 a iii -2 40Wit •...., ,..::. ,.. IWIMMUki im.'"Ii .:1:';'te•'!!' .5) ''IO. Ce.'i,....'\ t*:i'...egil'''. • ". , ';', it.„.:.. ci) k) Z > rn , '..''' th c E' t- t-- r..").. • vs.' ,-ivy,'e. o ...,....„................,., ,e'll,••"..•.',.4:4.:,:--, ci, iiIIIIIIIIIN.R10.1 ; --,-,44444•••:th---'-‘ ./. -4,,,,,, .,,„,,,:„.,,,::,,,,.:::;:i,.::::kv:, ,g'i.-',A1;,. .,,,-- •.:: '."':-.... •.,....,„,........... 04.:Pii.::::::,:::;:i.lii::,;:..:,,,,.. p n .1 ...o.ygia.::::::::;t-rA..:,:...,::„:.„-,,..,:•,,,,,,.....,,,..,:•,: ,,,,,,,''',..-1_,:::::,14,,:,..zv.::::....5.5; t\) ..:::::„..„..,„•:::.:,:::-.,•.,„.„, .....„:„,.,,:,.,:„ :„... ,,,,„:-...,, ..„.„ ,::.:, .•,,. : .„,,:,.:,:,,,.:„,,::,:,..,.,,.., z-,,,,,,:igk..._,,,1,4:. ::',1:- -•... -..."1 c 1,,,,, :.,.:,..:•...,,... ,....r,:.7,...,.. iiiilitlitliaP.: ..,..,, ...:-.. .,,...:1,4„.„..., st...-%--:g.„,-•.-4-, ...., : ,,,,,,,,01,:.,:.v:::,.,,,,,,,... it,.1: ::-:. ''...---.74:J 486''.1.'f''''. #,....,41 .,;..'.•:.; ..e..46.mw-Erem.A.6.4.4.i9i9.66,E.to .,,...,.......,•i.w...,......> A.A.'12Y6.6,6•Acrgigt9i9;96:6:02S.6,6,45:19.isitics.6.6'...!!!:. ; ii,‘,...,„*..Li..; 4,4,,..,,itiltglisii‘.:;-:::i4;:::::,,,,..:,Altitir 1;17.01.: •"..66.?_,,,tifft,te, , :,..,..A.isitgt tzr.....:,..-,,....,....... ,..k. ..::::‘,....,..,,,,s.\ 4(iigil)!Ii:::;A:t14* " ;-.:;44,;;;:4.-.3qj i.i'35:::!•;:iiiitk,"710t-!!'"Ii.k i'',":',:a,.ii.itt'Ati;.:. ak.'"it,i, : :4°.,,,,;.4,.e. ...-i 4,;::::I.iiik.,,, ,,,,,:if.r...„,1%,;401:4;!74.hr::**4igt.?if;:::),;;;:iiii*:";tiii;,;;;,„:0$'''''X'11/1111.:?1,c1P-it..4':'W‘t' i .. t:1:47.•:;0:16:6:4e,:-:Wri,, :-,-;',;:if:r$i:•:;::),:;!).: :•if,1 'Lif ;.,..,,,f : 'iiiiii20111.,:.:....:1.kig,isA'" .44:$:://:.• 7,......,,,. '114:01...."14' ti O U ..., i-, o I-, \ V1 O a tA >1 bA o E E o 0 U CI 0 CT' a) •••• rad 0Q O 0 0) O O 1.4 0• O c`IiiE f?)-4 .r., • .� 412 O O .....0 °t to 1a ;) 'c? ' cr o 07, 4) — Pm* C.) •O cd 0 47.4 .�0 .4 ;' vi CI) CI) 1 •,.. ,...4 4) U ,5 ^ 0) , O g 0)> a) v' c� `r' Cr " � W�CD 0 0) 4.0� O 4-� O .. A 0 4) 2O 5 O E o • .4 [� O r G, w O O �„� N 4a' O 00 N ‘,..-.4 0 F.. .1 ;..4 Ci) CKS ".45. C+4 bi) $.4 .4 = .411/ 4 co •IF.,, to tip 8..61) p ri 04 .><' O 7, cz -0 " 0 p=..-4 as Z '-' 7, N ct3 0 , c, ZacW O i- , . ,, C ci-4 •- �1, `s Q 0)0) Q bA O .,,,CU 0 0 at1--44:, U �, W •...1 0(.4.-t vc•''"' l!t f) 0'174 ;_, F._,'""' cn E ..4 ' CA 4! „.,c4--1 .,.,"Fizs 5 g.a, E'"4 0 Z 412 c.) ii . kr) 0 v) E L. ri) -4-. v-a '' cip"cr) 9, - 0 — 0 cl• E" ' = v, as c, v, r:L, b4 O �' .4 ° CI) 4 MI "L1 p rit, >. ,p, . ,...4 — .,.. b— c,y bA C1) 14' (1) U 0-4 ;_, gz . f-4 '"a'7 1-'d 2 c 9 .4.:lo 6 as.,..,Q V — , •— • z � c)�.,..�, . E Cd CdE Zo W ) •p.m hi• Q� E-' 3 c. '-" 4-1.� a O 0 - a) ,D c,8 m �.4 '� ...a V �, O ›' Q a, 0 c•� .0 W v� O O E •.■I o c� Q a) 6 4) FA .-1 4) a O > O a) 000� W M■4 F— O a < - < v,. 0,� -� < .— ....1 al F O U c) .--i 11 al U a. (,,,,,,) . . ! tt I- * xw» • AZ _ 0--) ,7'.n 0.4 tow . 1 �dl1 r �, )�. �I�y�y � "Ys ew"m) • RO� • O F-� O O N I-. M 4) — U• c Q'',0 N (1) 4) � o ck cnd at Cl."ceRs' co .Fde 8 r—, a o p4 M a) a) c)0 M —• , O N U � v) � N • N - o +., • 0 O v 4) • 4) O cu _oO a) O 0 o o O o 0) 0 0) O O O O 0 cv 4) O c+-+ .. M O '.� O VI o W 0 '0 ,.� CA • 5 t-, O •• O .,.., CU g E-1 S 4) > rn 4- A.,• • „91, 00 SOD� c) 'tet cn c,1 43 •W ZrZ4) o� u- .. cd 4. 0 M. HOci) •� O o � HN a) Z U O00c • :5 CI' �,�D Ci) ' a ' ero ' H o 2 . c ,, ct ..-A. 7:6 2,3..t.... r-c-,,,1 al a: a: c,z1 F_, n .1.. -at 4., 'rts as c+, E 0 0 0 cu f. ;•'40 (:)4CCI 0 .04) �-' v, vpv� 4�) O s'� = Q cd O ( -, a) 4) a) s� Z N E =' 0 .� a;`+-. •cu ' E ct 0 ,t ,.1 (/j cry �' bUA'�, pil 3 Ncn O� D a w H �. cc ZZ -, E � wwra. �.s-, - < � - O D e? r 11l s I • .6.• 1 , 4 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 'OUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Jeffrey H. Weir, CED Economic Development Administrator SUBJECT: Consideration and/or Possible Action Regarding an Update for the FY 2000/2001 Greater Tucson Strategic Partnership for Economic Development Legislative Issues. SUMMARY: A significant outgrowth of the Greater Tucson Economic Council (GTEC) was the creation of the Greater Tucson Strategic Partnership for Economic Development (GTSPED). GTSPED is a regional organization with representation from all of the regions educational, political, and business sectors. A primary (and highly successful) focus for GTSPED is identification of critical legislative issues that need introduction and promotion at the state level. This effort for the past few years incorporates input and considerations from all of the regional economic development organizations within Arizona. This year's committee outcomes will focus on five issues: 1. Capital Formation/Venture Capital Funding- -icourage implementation of the Alliance Model with an initial consideration of$ 100 Million in state income _..x credits (only required if ventures fail). Increased Venture capital will aid in the creation of new businesses, which will provide new employment opportunities. 2. Business Tax Reform/Sales Factor Weighting Increase—Increase the Sales Factor from 50% to 100%. Reducing the other factors of labor and property valuation will encourage increased capital investments in plant and equipment within businesses that focus on "exporting" of products resulting in a more diversified local economy. 3. Enterprise Zone Program Renewal —Existing Enterprise Zone Program legislation will sunset on June 30, 2001. The Enterprise Zone Program provides for a reduction of local property taxes and the use of state income tax credits related to employee training. The Program is applied only to economically distressed areas. 4. Workforce Development—Revise existing legislation to allow for advanced training of skill requirements for new technology related employment opportunities identified by local cluster and foundation businesses. Provide $ 500,000 on a 2 to 1 match basis for the Southern Arizona Institute of Advanced Technology to equip laboratories in optics and electronics. Support a state sponsored School-to-Work Program that replaces the federally sponsored Program that will sunset in 2001. Amending the existing state requirement for high school graduation increasing the credit requirements from twenty to twenty-two. 5. Cluster Funding Increase—Financial support for funding of Cluster Promotion (Optics Cluster, Bio-Med Cluster, Industry & Aerospace Cluster, Plastics/Advanced Materials Cluster, etc.)was initiated this fiscal year. GTSPED is supporting an increase in funding from the current level of approximately $ 2.2 Million annually to $ 20 Million annual ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Legislative Agenda Priority Issues, Greater Tucson Strategic Partnership for Economic Development, dated November 13, 2000. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 FISCAL IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Town Council of Oro Valley express support for the GTSPED Legislative Priority Issues as identified in the attached communiqué dated November 13, 2000. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign a letter addressed to Mr. Larry Aldrich, GTSPED Co-Chairperson, expressing the Town's support of the GTSPED Legislative Priority Issues. taw, ,/ (j , 1,11 Jeffrey t' ir, CED ? Economic Development Administrator ar,ilki„.. David L. Andrews Finance Director Ohl/ A Chuck Swe•t Town Manager Proposed Legislative Agenda Priority Issues Greater Tucson Strategic Partnership for Economic Development November 13, 2000 Members of the Legislative Agenda Working Group Hank Atha, Pima County Community Services Kendall Bert, City of Tucson Office of Economic Development Cort Chalfant, Holualoa Arizona Sally Fernandez, Industry & Aerospace Cluster John D. Grabo, Ec.D., Greater Tucson Economic Council John Foster, Commercial Realty Advisors Bob Hagen, Co-Chair ITASA (IT Cluster) Larry Hecker, Hecker and Muehlbach Law Firm Duff Hearon, Ashland Group Bob Johnston, Southern Arizona Leadership Council Terry Meland, Texas Instruments Dr. Pat Patton, Tucson Electric Power Ron Stuht, Tucson Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce Jeff Weir, Town of Oro Valley While Arizona's economy continues to be strong, there is a danger that we will be passed by in the race to lead the knowledge economy. Make no mistake; the next generation centers of technology are being established right now. Albuquerque, Salt Lake City, Reno, Portland, all are aggressive in support of their region's economic development and they are outpacing Arizona. In four short years, these "technology poles" will be set in stone. If we are to realize our full potential, the time is now for action that enhances Arizona's competitiveness in economic development. The Greater Tucson Strategic Partnership for Economic Development believes our state must respond to the challenge that other states are making to our claim to the Optics Valley title in Tucson, and the Silicon Desert title in Phoenix. The state's response should be rapid and provide all regions of the state with the ability to be more agile than the other states that look to create jobs at the expense of Arizona. Future jobs, the creation of wealth for our citizens, and the growth of the Arizona tax base is at stake. For our state to succeed it will take bold leadership and great vision from our elected officials. In September of this year, a working group was formed within GTSPED to evaluate issues, if acted upon, will create a business environment that makes not only the state more attractive to capital intensive, export oriented technology businesses, but in fact make individual companies more competitive in their own marketplace. The successful creation of wealth is dependent upon the business environment we create. Therefore, we ask your consideration and leadership in passing the following recommendations presented by GTSPED. Our priority issues for the upcoming session are: Capital Formation — Create a state supported venture capital fund in Arizona Business Tax Reform— Make the following two tax policy changes: • Increase the wieghting of the sales factor in Arizona's multi-state corporate income tax apportionment formula to 100%. • Extend the Enterprise Zone Program with adjustments that will create greater use of the program in urban and rural Arizona. Workforce Development • Implement proposed improvements in the training program to help prepare the present adult workforce for future jobs. • Implement and support educational programs that we believe will improve the preparation of current K-12 students for future, new technology employment. Cluster Funding- Increase funding for statewide and regional industry clusters for specific, outcome driven projects These proposed changes have been evaluated with the overall competitiveness of Arizona in mind. Specifically, our economic development agenda seeks to create wealth for the citizens of Arizona through the creation of high quality jobs while also increasing the tax revenue stream to the state through increased investment of business and industry in Arizona. The opportunity to succeed is ours. We believe these initiatives put urban and rural Arizona in a better position to develop our new, knowledge based economies. Capital Formation As our economy transitions from the tradition, or industrial economy to knowledge based global economy, we recognize the significant changes that have occurred in business. Corporate America has downsized, with Fortune 500 employment having declined 4.5 million from 1979-1994, with entrepreneurial companies now the prime source of new employment. Much of the change is due to global competition, pervasive application of the computer, and a rapid transition to a service economy. The relationships understood to exist between the business cycle, inflation, and unemployment appear to have been affected by investments in information technology, corporate restructurings, deregulation, and domestic fiscal and monetary policy. Today, regional economies require technology, business infrastructure, an entrepreneurial environment, and capital to compete in the knowledge economy. It has been suggested that venture capital appears in virtually every inventory of`necessary' conditions for entrepreneurship. Local venture capital has become a requirement for a region's ability to compete for the jobs our knowledge economy will create. Venture capital provides financing for entrepreneurial companies who do not have access to traditional funding sources. Value is added through the development of a board of directors and a number of advisory services. The local component of venture capital is evident by data that shows 25% of firms receiving funding have a venture investor within seven miles, and more than 50% have a venture investor within 60 miles. The impact of venture capital on an economy is evident. In 1998, $141 million of venture funds, a small amount by national standards, were invested in Arizona companies. For every one dollar of funding, $6.54 of revenue were generated, and $2.36 of additional household income was created. Additionally, 3,900 jobs were created. While the impact of capital is documented, so is the absence of greater amounts of venture funds. • "61% of the survey firms indicate that availability of financing to start up was poor to mediocre" Impact of the High Technology Industry on the Arizona Economy • The inability to raise money for venture capital funds "may well be the weakest point in Arizona's venturing environment" The 1999 Arizona Venture Capital Study • "Lack of access to (expansion and new venture financing) is the number one constraint to future growth of the software industry" The Changing Face of the Software Cluster in Arizona Recommendation Allow the implementation of the Alliance Model, which will: • Monetize $100 million in state tax credits • Invest proceeds in 8-10 professionally managed seed and venture funds with assistance from a qualified gatekeeper • Provided that returns equal or exceed historic averages, tax credits will not be realized, resulting in a low/no cost alternative to the state. • Any surplus forms a permanent revolving investment fund • Potential decrease in state revenues should investments under-perform and tax credits be realized Business Tax Reform Sales Factor Weighting Increase: When a corporation does business in more than one state, its income must be apportioned among the states in which it does business. States commonly use a three-factor apportionment formula consisting of property, payroll and sales to determine the amount of income they may tax. Each factor is the ratio of the in- state dollar amount to the total dollar amount for that factor. Originally, most apportionment formulas used a simple averaging of the three factors (1/3rd for property, 1/3rd for payroll, and 1/3rd for sales). Over the years, most states have realized that the property and payroll factors in the apportionment formula create disincentives for business to invest in capital and payroll in their state. As a result, most states have modified their apportionment formulas to increase the weight of the sales factor relative to the property and payroll factors. By decreasing the weight of the property and payroll factors, a state reduces the corporate income tax cost of in-state capital investment and employment, making it more attractive for taxpayers such as multi-state manufacturers to operate in their state. Twenty-five states, including Arizona, have increased the weight of their sales factor by double weighting that portion of the equation. To make their state even more attractive to manufacturers, nine states have increased their sales factor weighting above 50%: • Ohio has a 60% sales factor weighting, with payroll and property at 20% each. • Minnesota has 70% sales factor weighting, with payroll and property at 15% each. • Michigan has 90% sales factor weighting, with payroll and property at 5% each. • Iowa, Illinois, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, and Texas have 100% sales factor weighting. Debra Roubik, and economist and President of VisonEcon conducted a study regarding the impact of increasing the weighting of the sales factor to 100%. Her findings state: "(The) estimated the impact that switching to a single sales factor apportionment formula would have on job creation, average annual wages for Arizona workers and the resultant Arizona State tax revenues. By lessening the tax burden of carrying significant in-state payroll and property, an increase in the weight of the sales factor would have a significant positive effect on the State's employment growth. According to the VisionEcon Dynamic Revenue Model, a single factor sales apportionment in 2001 would create an additional 33 7,000 jobs in Arizona by year 2015. The model also estimates that 249,000 of these jobs would emerge from high pay manufacturing industries. Hence, the sales factor change would also aid in increasing the average annual wage for Arizona workers by as much as $3,500 by the year 2015. These new jobs and higher wages would add as much as $1.2 billion in state general fund revenues for fiscal year 2015 from a baseline forecast for revenues of$11.2 billion." Further study indicates broad revenue implications for a state moving to single wieghted sales factor. In a February 1999 study done by the University of Chicago and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (Alan Goolsbee, Edward Maydew, John Healy, and Michael Schadewald), it was predicted that the state of Wisconsin could realize an increase in manufacturing jobs by about 2.9%, with non-manfacturing employment projected to increase by about 2.4%. The study anticipates realizing an increase of approximately $51 million in individual income tax revenue. Recommendation The weight of the sales factor in Arizona's corporate income tax apportionment formula should be increased above 50% to 100%. This would put Arizona in the select group of states that have increased their sales factor weights above 50% and would help to make Arizona very competitive in attracting and retaining manufacturing operations. The increase to the sales factor weight should be elective in order to hold harmless those companies that would otherwise experience a tax increase. Enterprise Zone Program: Enterprise zones are economically distressed areas in Arizona where businesses are provided state tax incentives to develop or expand their facilities or operations. The enterprise zone designation is based upon either the level of unemployment or poverty for area residents (150% of state or local average, respectively). The goals of the program are to encourage: • Businesses to make capital investments in enterprise zones through locatinging in or expanding facilities within the zone. • Employers to create quality jobs, which are made available to zone residents. The Enterprise Zone program was first authorized in 1989 and is scheduled to sunset June 30, 2001. In 1996, the program was revised to make it a more useful economic development tool. Strong urban and rural support exists for the extension of the program, for an additional five years. Proposed Legislative Changes 1. Expiration date: • Extend the expiration date of the program to June 30, 2006. 2. Income tax credits: • Allow tax credits for new jobs except those at business locations where more than 50% of the principal business activity consists of the sale of tangible personal property at retail. • An employment position for which credit is taken must be full-time, with a minimum of 1,820 hours annually. • Approve certification of second and third-year credits even if the enterprise zone designation is terminated. • Approve carry-forward of credits for five years even if the enterprise zone designation is terminated. • New provisions would apply to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2001. 3. Property reclassification: • Change the investment requirement to a three-tiered schedule based on population of the community in which the applicant is located. - The revised investment amounts are: a. $500,000 for companies located in communities with population less than 10,000 or in unincorporated areas of a county other than Maricopa and Pima. b. $1,000,000 for companies located in communities with populations between 10,000 and 80,000 or in unincorporated areas of Maricopa and Pima Counties. c. $2,000,000 for companies located in communities with populations greater than 80,000. • Treat new and existing zone businesses the same by deleting the requirement that existing manufacturers show a profitable operating history. • New provisions will apply to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2001, with investment aggregated since January 1, 1996. 4. Administration • Develop transitional procedures for certification of zones until census 2000 data is available. • Provide funding for Arizona Department of Commerce administration of the program. Workforce Development Pima County unemployment rates continue in the 2.5 to 3 percent range. Consequently, workforce and workforce training and preparation continue to be primary GTSPED concerns. Last session GTSPED proposed action on two major workforce issues. First, it proposed an increase in State funding available workforce training. Two alternative dedicated funding mechanisms were proposed. Second, it proposed that the State training program be broadened to include advance preparation of the workforce for higher technology employment. Advance preparation includes both improving basic math and language skills which are needed in all industries and advance technician training in new industries such as electronics and optics. The legislature responded to the funding need by authorizing a 0.1% surcharge on all Unemployment Insurance tax payments. The new surcharge begins January 1, 2001 and all of the revenues are directed toward the Arizona Job Training Program. The new, dedicated funding is expected to increase Arizona Job Training revenues from approximately $ 6million in 1999-2000 to an estimated $18 million in 2001-02. This year the proposed GTSPED workforce agenda focuses on two objectives. First, it proposes improvements in the training program to help prepare the present adult workforce for future jobs. Second, it proposes and supports educational programs that we • believe will improve the preparation of current K-12 students for future, new technology employment. Advance Preparation of Adults - The new law passed last session does not effectively authorize expenditures for advance training of workers for future employment. Therefore we propose amendments to ARS 41-1541, the Arizona Job Training Fund, which will specifically fund proposals submitted by a Local Workforce Investment Board which are intended to improve basic math and language skills or which provide training in skills identified by local clusters and foundations as necessary for the expansion of companies,jobs and wages in their economic sector. - Appropriate $500,000 of State funding for the Southern Arizona Institute of Advanced Technology (SAIAT). This is a $2 to $1 state match of the existing Pima County and City of Tucson combined appropriations. The state appropriation would equip additional laboratories in optics and electronics and speed the addition of new curricula and additional students. Funding might be derived from the Arizona Job Training Program or from a separate dedicated appropriation. Education and Workforce Preparation - Support a state School-to-Work program to replace the federal School to Work legislation which sunsets in 2001. The state program should follow the Pima County School-to-Work program model and require active participation of private businesses as a majority on local advisory boards, in participating schools, and in the design and delivery of specific School-to-Work programs. - GTSPED supports Proposition 301 to increase funding for education and supports implementing legislation which includes better pay for teachers, additional funding for high school vocational and technological education, and continued authorization for joint vocational/technical high school districts. - GTSPED supports amendment to existing law to increase the State requirement for high school graduation from twenty to twenty-two credits, provide the additional state funding needed to provide the additional credits, and require that one of the additional credits required will be in mathematics and the other in vocational/technical skills. This amendment would help bring the graduation requirements in better alignment with the AIMS skill expectations and help provide graduates who are prepared for new technology employment. Cluster Funding In order for Arizona to grow, diversify its economic base and remain competitive with other states in the New Economy (i.e., one which is knowledge as opposed to physical- asset based), it's essential that a close public/private partnership be developed and maintained between the State and its key cluster/foundation economic development • organizations. It's also important that the partnership engage state universities, community colleges, K-16 schools, metropolitan and rural communities and designated state/local economic development organizations. Such a partnership can best be strengthened and further developed via a continuation of state cluster/foundation business development project funding initiated in FY 2000/2001. Funding is requested in the amount of$20 million in FY 2001/2002 and a like amount in FY 2002/2003. It would in turn be matched (with the exception of operational development funds needed to undertake such projects) by local county, city, economic development organization, state university, cluster and private-sector funds. The ultimate or overriding goal of this proposal is to make available sufficient resources for Arizona's cluster/foundation program to quickly reach the next logical level/stage in its development. In doing so, it could enter the spotlight and become widely viewed as one capable of generating the numbers/types of high-tech and other jobs needed for Arizona to effectively compete with other states in the New Economy and be viewed as a national leader in doing so. Funds made available under this proposal would be specifically utilized in support of critically-needed cluster business development programs in areas such as: Capital Development; E-business Development; Marketing Development; Operational Development; Supplier Chain Development; Telecom Infrastructure Development; Tech Transfer/Tech Incubation Development; and Workforce Development. Operational Development funds are considered to be the greatest or highest priority need of the clusters/foundations. Initial implementation of such cluster/foundation business development programs has already begun as part of requests to utilize $1.5 million of FY 2000/2001 High-Tech Legislative and Commerce & Economic Development Commission (CEDC) grant funds made available through the Arizona Department of Commerce (ADOC). Phase 1 of the implementation deals with $700,000 in designated High-Tech Legislative and CEDC cluster funds. Phase 2 of the implementation entails the High-Tech Clusters working in partnership with the State Universities and Tech Incubators. Recommendation It is requested that $20 million dollars in State funding be provided during FY 2001/2002 and a like amount in FY 2002/2003 for cluster/foundation business development projects on a statewide basis via a combination of CEDC and/or Arizona legislative funding as noted below. The request also takes into account the needs of regional cluster coordinating/implementing organizations and metro/rural areas outside Phoenix and Tucson in working towards cluster/foundation development throughout Arizona. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 6 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Sangeeta Jain, Planner I SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. R(00)-105 OV12-00-20A SETTING POLICY REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WITH SLOPES 25% AND GREATER WITHIN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND: Staff and the WLB Group / Vistoso Partners LLC. request Town Council consideration of an interpretation of the Rancho Vistoso (RV) Planned Area Development (PAD). In reviewing the preliminary plat of RV Neighborhood 10, Parcel Z, the need to clarify a provision of the RV PAD became evident. The applicant wishes to establish a residential road within an area that includes slopes 25% and greater. It is important to distinguish between the use of an interpretation versus a variance. In general, interpretations are utilized to clarify vague provisions, conflicts or omissions in the Zoning Code or PAD. On the other hand, variances involve requests for a specific modification to a specific standard defined in the Zoning Code or PAD. SUMMARY: Staff asserts that areas with slopes 25% and greater are unsuitable for development as per RV Planned Area Development (PAD) and the applicant disagrees with this interpretation. Over the history of the PAD, this issue has never been addressed comprehensively and formally. It has always been dealt with on a case by case basis. The Council action this evening will provide policy for the development of all parcels within the Rancho Vistoso PAD which have slopes 25% and greater. Normally, interpretations are set by the Planning and Zoning Administrator; however the RV PAD provides for a unique and a specific direction. As per RV PAD Plan Enforcement Procedures (Page 31): "Where ambiguity arises as to the terms of this P.A.D., recommendations by the Oro Valley DRB and subsequent action by the Oro Valley Town Council shall govern. " There are three areas of ambiguity related to the regulation of 25% and greater slopes by the PAD. First, it is debatable whether the written text g re ardin development in slopes 25% and greater was meant to apply to all 25% regarding and greater sloped areas or just those areas identified in the RV PAD map. In the past, using the map as the best available data to and regulate 25% greater slope areas may have been acceptable, but now more detailed slope g analyses are available. Thus, there are more identified 25% and greater slope areas, some of which are designated �y the PAD for development. Second, the PAD map shows some roads in areas that, even at the time the PAD as drafted, were determined to have a slope of 25% and greater. Third, past practice has allowed limited development in 25%and greater slope areas. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY -OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 5 Definition of 25% Slopes for this Interpretation As defined in the OVZCR Sec. 15-405, a "25% slope is one that is a minimum of 6 feet vertical from toe to top of edge, and any 25% sloped area greater than thirty (30) feet in any horizontal direction." RV PAD Guidance on Slopes 25% and Greater The Rancho Vistoso (RV) Planned Area Development (PAD) designates areas with slopes greater than 25% as "unsuitable for development and will be set aside as Hillside District Area as shown on the Hillside District Map." As per staff interpretation of RV PAD, "unsuitable for development"means that: (i) no construction will be allowed in these areas, and (ii) they will be protected as natural open space. Following are the excerpts from the RV PAD documents that were utilized to reach the aforementioned interpretation: • Per RV PAD Development Requirements, Slopes (Page 38) "There shall be no development on slopes of 25 percent or greater." • Per RV PAD Hillside District and Grading(Page 88) "Those areas with slopes of 25 percent or greater are unsuitable for development and will be set aside as Hillside District Area as shown on the Hillside District Map. All of the area included within the Hillside District is also es designated as Hillside Conservation Area and the land shall be set aside g for the conservation of permanent natural open space." • Per RV PAD Appendix Slope Analysis (Page 10) "Slopes of greater than 25 percent are considered unsuitable for development and are to be preserved as open space". • Per RV PAD Appendix Development Suitability,Unsuitable for Development(Page 41) The unsuitable for development category is characterized by slopes in excess of 25 percent, washes with flows exceeding 1000 cubic feet per second and most significant wildlife vegetative/wildlife habitat. Only recreational uses will be permitted in this category". Previous Cases in Rancho Vistoso Involving Slopes 25% and greater April 2000 OV12-00-03 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 Phase 1 Preliminary Block Plat for Four Lots on Either Side of the Commerce Loop Alignment South of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. In this case, there were six areas of 25% slope, in one of the lots. The majority of these areas were within the right- of-way for Commerce Loop Drive, and the remainder was less than 3/4 of an acre. The roads that were allowed through areas with 25% slopes to provide access to the commercial development were already included on the RV PAD map. The trade for encroached areas with slopes 25% and greater for open space was done to a ratio greater 'pan 1:1. F:\OV\OV12\2000\12-00-20\TC Report Interpretation Dec.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 5 September 1999 OV12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse And Recreation Center Development Plan, Located West Of Rancho Vistoso Blvd., One Mile North Of Vistoso Highlands Drive In this case, the Planning and Zoning Administrator agreed, prior to project submittal, that there could be limited encroachment into the 25% slope areas in the golf course. The areas to be exchanged as an equal amount of buildable area was designated on the development plan as open space, and were approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. The total encroachment was to the amount of 10,089 square feet. March 1999 OV12-98-22 Stone Canyon II Preliminary Plat, Common Areas A & B, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Located In The Northwest Corner Of The Rancho Vistoso Pad, North And West Of The Golf Club At Vistoso All areas of 25% orreater slopes were delineated on the plat as no-build areas, and designated as conservation g easements on the plat. The recommendation was to delete the lots where building pads cannot be placed outside the 25% slope areas. April 1998 OV12-98-2 Stone Canyon I Preliminary Plat, Lots 1-125, Common Areas A & B, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, Parcels AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, C, D, E, M & P All areas of slope 25% and greater were identified on the plat, and set aside from development as natural nservation area. A Rancho Vistoso PAD amendment in April 1998 specified that disturbance of incidental mounds, small piles of rocks including 25% or greater slopes, could be approved on a case-by-case basis. The term "Incidental mound" was defined as a pile of rocks including 25% or greater slopes. February 1997 OV12-96-18 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, Parcel E, Lots 1-80,Preliminary Plat This case did not involve encroachment into 25% and greater slopes, but does provide guidelines on trading open space for development areas. It was determined, that the PAD allows the exchange of area within the buildable limits for an equal area outside those limits. The exchange was permitted under the following conditions: • The area previously located within the buildable area(the 100' open space area adjacent to Sun City homes) must be designated as "undisturbed natural area" on the plat. This designation will prevent construction of any kind on this land. • Development on areas previously designated as unbuildable will be restricted to ridgetops and shall not damage or impact adjacent 25% slopes. • The final developable area of the final plat shall not exceed the developable area permitted before the exchange. April 1993 OV12-93-2 Sun City Vistoso,Unit 16,Preliminary Plat and Landscape Plan This site situated in the middle of Sun City contained areas of steep slopes. Given the situation of this parcel in the middle of the Sun City, "loss of this hillside was not considered significant". However, approximately 50% of is site was left as undisturbed natural open space. F:\ov\ov12\2000\12-00-20\TC Report Interpretation Dec.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY U NCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 5 GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE: Protection of areas with slopes 25% and greater is compatible with the policies in the General Plan. The o following policies apply: Policy 1.1B Promote clustering(average density)developments to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Policy 1.1D The Hillside Development Overlay Zone (HDZ) grading and development standards shall be Po cy p considered at the time of rezoning and shall supersede when a conflict exists between the land use map and the HDZ standards. Policy1.111 Slopes 15% and greater shall be evaluated for development compatibility, safety, and preservation as natural open space. Policy1.1K Consider development impacts on natural rolling terrain and emphasize low-density p developments in these areas. Policy9.1E All development proposals should show design strategies used to minimize changes to existing p topography and the disturbance of existing vegetation. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The Development Review Board recommended this interpretation for approval by a 4-2 vote on November 14, 90. The DRB recommended minor changes to criterion #4 and #5 and they have been incorporated in the 11'.,riteria below. RECOMMENDATION: Planning recognizes nizes that the RV PAD text places very restrictive limits on development in areas of 25 g percentor greater reater slopes within the PAD. It does not deal with any exceptions and prohibits any development in these areas. The Town's Hillside Development Zone (HDZ), Chapter 10 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code recognizes this problem and thus allows roadway or driveway access in these areas and at Revised (OVZCR) g the same timep rotects such areas. As per Sec. 10-105 of the OVZCR, "...Grading for roadway or driveway access shall not cross a 25% or greater sloped area unless no alternative routes exist." Staff recommendation is to establish the following criteria for development in areas in Rancho Vistoso PAD that have slopes 25% and greater: 1. 25%slopedefined as one that is a minimum of 6 feet vertical from toe to top of edge, and any 25%sloped is area greater than thirty (30)feet in any horizontal direction. 2. Gradingshall not cross a 25% or greater sloped area unless no alternative routes exist or the for roadway road is shown on the RV PAD map. 3. Grading limits for driveways and building envelopes shall not encroach into areas with slopes 25% and y greater for Medium high density residential or any lesser density residential developments. Minor encroachments into 25% and greater sloped areas may be allowed in all other land use categories defined in RV PAD map. 5. Trade areas are required to offset all encroachments (including roads not designated on RV PAD map) of 25% andg reater sloped areas on at least a 1:1 ratio, and trade area must contain "meaningful open F:\ov\ov12\2000\12-00-20\TC Report Interpretation Dec.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1UNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 5 of 5 ace . Meaningful space". openspace may be defined as open space that reduces fragmentation, has recreational p value, improves overall subdivision design, and creates buffers along environmentally sensitive areas, among other criteria. The above interpretation applies only to areas with slopes 25% and greater and does not apply to any other open space trades. Furthermore, it is important to note that the OVZCR and previous case histories were utilized to define the aforementioned criteria. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I MOVE to APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. R 00-105 0V12-00-20A Setting Policy Regarding Development In Areas With Slopes 25%And Greater Within The Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development. -OR- I MOVE to APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. R 00-105 OV 12-00-20A Setting Policy Regarding Development In Areas With Slopes 25% And Greater Within The Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development with the following changes -OR- MOVE to DENY RESOLUTION NO. R00-105 OV 12-00-20A Setting Policy Regarding Development In Areas With Slopes 25%And Greater Within The Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Number(R) 00- 105 /' . Pla s a►d Zoning Administrator jeL, Community Development Director at/A'djae-a * Town Manager F:\ov\ov12\2000\12-00-20\TC Report Interpretation Dec.doc RESOLUTION NO. (R)00- 105 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, SETTING POLICY REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WITH SLOPES 25%AND GREATER WITHIN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, it is deemed in the public interest to establish criteria for the development of slopes 25% andg reater within the area know as the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development(PAD). WHEREAS,there are ambiguities in the PAD regarding the treatment of 25% and greater slope areas. WHEREAS,the PAD calls for the Town Council to address ambiguities in the PAD. WHEREAS, the DRB has considered and made its recommendation to the Town Council on this matter. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY THAT: Section 1. Development in areas in Rancho Vistoso PAD that have slopes 25% and greater is generally prohibited, but limited encroachment may be allowed under the following criteria: 1. In accordance with the Zoning Code, a 25% or greater slope is defined as one that is a minimum of 6 feet vertical from toe to top of edge, and is greater than thirty (30) feet in any horizontal direction. 2. Grading for roadway shall not cross a 25% or greater sloped area unless no alternative routes exist or the road is shown on the Rancho Vistoso PAD map. 3. Grading limits for driveways and building envelopes shall not encroach into areas with slopes 25% and greater for Medium High Density Residential or any lesser density residential developments. 4. Minor encroachments into 25% and greater sloped areas may be allowed in all other land use categories defined in Rancho Vistoso PAD map. 5. Trade areas are required to offset all encroachments into 25% and greater sloped areas except for the development of roads designated on the Rancho Vistoso PAD map. Trades shall be at least on a 1:1 ratio, and trade areas must contain"meaningful" open space. Meaningful open space may be defined as, among other criteria, open space that reduces fragmentation, has recreational value, improves overall subdivision design, and creates buffers along environmentally sensitive areas. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-105 (continued) Section 2. This policy applies only to areas with slopes 25% and greater and does not apply to any other open space encroachment and/or trades. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 6th day of December , 2000. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan Dudley, Town Attorney SUPu ► : : 'o: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6,2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL _ =s«�= f.." TQV FROM: Michael Shanley, Planner I SUBJECT: ADDENDUM: OV12-87-1B FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT LA RESERVE (WILDERNESS III) APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF MILE EAST OF THE ORACLE ROAD-LA RESERVE DRIVE INTERSECTION ISSUE: RESPONSES FROM SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS AFTER POSTING THE PROPERTY Phillip Slattery, an absentee owner of a house on combined lots 31 & 32 of La Reserve Parcels O&S, initiated a petitionopposing o osin the proposed plat amendment to be heard at the December 6th Council meeting. Signatures have been collected on a petition form and two additional form letters that were individually faxed Mr. Slattery, indicated that those who have signed are opposed to reducing the front yard setback since they desire to maintain a larger distance between the house and the street. As a result, avoid the tendency to build homes in a row along the street. The total number of represented lots is 27. In some cases both husband and wife signed; however, in compiling the total, only individual lots have been counted. Six (6) of the owners have property within the Wilderness Estates III (La Reserve Parcel C, lots 43-64). The balance reside in the adjacent subdivision of La Reserve •cels 0 & S. The attached map shows location of owners who have opposed the plat amendment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Petition of signatures and total tabulation 2. Location map F:\OV\Ov12\1987\12-87-1\12-87-1B amend Fsetback\TC ReportAdenum.doc &Lim •PlaIREVYnd Zoning Administrator (41-1,k Co unity Development Director Town Manager TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY SUBJECT: OV12-87-1B FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT LA RESERVE PARCEL C, LOTS 43-64 (WILDERNESS ESTATES IIn TO REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACKS FROM 30 FT. TO 20 FT. We the undersigned residents of La Reserve Wilderness III object to the passage of OV12-87-1B Final Plat Amendment La Reserve Parcel C, Lots 43-64 (Wilderness Estates III) to reduce front yard setbacks from 30 feet to 20 feet. Our reasons follow: 1. We do not feel that the original setback requirements were made without considering the necessity to cut and fill on some of the lots plated and sold to the public as part of a "carefully planned 1,198 + acre community," that was approved by the town of Oro Valley. 2. We do not feel that the personal desires of one or a few informed buyers of Wilderness III lots to change setback requirements for cost savings or convenience should outweigh the wishes of other property and home owners in this unique community to maintain the planned streetscapes and building guidelines of the La Reserve Homeowners Association and the zoning of the City of Oro Valley that was in effect when their properties were purchased. 3. Many Wilderness III lots are owned by absentee owners planning to build retirement homes in this subdivision and by our understanding are not notified of the proposed final plat amendment by either the town of Oro Valley or La Reserve Homeowners Association. Without notification these homeowners have no ability to write an objection, attend a meeting or go along with a change that will effect their chosen community. Property Owner: Lot(s): Date: ---gjil.)014.4,1400441,4 / e52_ /7- 7— zoo0 l 77 --Pl#C1Th ter 1.J7" U 2 Property Owner: Lot(s): Date: pee2-7w,eakt /(- 2.-1- 069 /ea _ 6. if Pi; 1660 �. " C�- i : �;�j�,• l9 //-.02 ma 7 —o - 60 L"-- 61.4_ 44/44,.,) a. 47i/ae& , • "?1 84eUe-- Pag„- (3ap,4q6c,„ S Exitc4 e.)._7/0O y -4;2 /1/4 2/6?c 17 'k lath Ri Do; P/A O_LiiLeA---- #247/ vS 11/2-7(Da )16;;;;F ig,?.Akiet:ife6 3q iv.2 17/ao /7 pg f, P,(aofA1 /A7</uf 7beMA-u-t-- I , 4 I/G2, -/o6 12(21 0; Qe /, ;/,,� �� � 1,4z0 VaS/°° YOkt �. �uc�}auvv�G( n tio .1 Qyft t t /0k2 7 n!• eveK-iziP6 trA�/� 3 Property Owner: Lot(s): Date: 14 (.1 // r-8 7 r7criejci C7r i9A44.1_, 4,fin*A Ac)-7- 2 /9 7/f: jle4->e/e,;e /.)Z -1% • I I vcks:ci 7eut. r. L nqq E 3),Ock: L6---c o es 1\01- /756 5., 5Ve- f /2Z,C OtaCri Odle o //0 /..,00,-,c_D e fitce oci Lidii 4,4 LT7 if-v6 /) • - t)'1 2'6 55 t ti TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY SUBJECT: 0V12-87-1B FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT LA RESERVE PARCEL C. LOTS 43-64 (WILDERNESS ESTATES III) TO REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACKS FROM 30 FT. TO 20 FT. We the undersigned residents of La Reserve Wilderness III object to the passage e of 0V12-87-1B Final Plat Amendment La Reserve Parcel C, Lots 43-64 (Wilderness Estates III) to reduce front yard setbacks from 30 feet to 20 feet. Our reasons follow: 1. We do not feel that the original setback requirements were made without considering the necessity to cut and fill on some of the lots plated and sold to the public as part of a "carefully planned 1,198 + acre community," that was approved by the town of Oro Valley. 2. We do not feel that the personal desires of one or a few informed buyers of Wilderness III lots to change setback requirements for cost savings or Y convenience should outweigh the wishes of other property and home owners in this unique community to maintain the planned streetscapes and building guidelines of the La Reserve Homeowners Association and the zoning of the City of Oro Valley that was in effect when their properties were purchased. 3. Many Wilderness III lots are owned by absentee owners planning to build retirement homes in this subdivision and by our understanding are not notified of the proposed final plat amendment by either the town of Oro Valley or La Reserve Homeowners Association. Without notification these homeowners have no ability to write an objection, attend a meeting or go along with a change that will effect their chosen community. Property Owner: Lot(s): Date: 1 i/29t`2en 11;40 52p4T3061 , BAKER rwm„ u4 \ c 4 ( .(C\ O. . r. \)\° TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY SUBJECT: 0V1287-i$._.UNAL_TLAT.___AmiziummiLLAAmiggim ZARcEICLOT 4 ' ! %,V . 11; ttt • 6 ROA, .. .. .J. : 0 7. .11:A , : • ti . ! 4.0 .. a Ilk We t e unders.i and residents of La Reserve Wilderness III object to the passage of. 4V12- 71B Final Plat Amendment La Reserve Parcel C, Lots 43-64 setbacksfeet to 20 feet. (Wilderness Estates III) to reduce front yard from 30 Our reasons follow: I. a do not feel that the original setback requirements were made without con idering the necessity to cat and fill on some of the lots plated and sold to theblit as part of a "carefully planned 1,198 + acre community," that was approve by the town of Oro Valley. 2. e do not feel that the personal. desires of ore or a few i' Q�d haulof ilderness III lots to change setback requirements for cost savings or con"enienc should outweigh the wishes of other property and home owner.s in this unique community to maintain the planned streetscapes and building Aires o the La Reserve Homeowners Association and the ming of the City of Oro Vail .y that was in effect when their properties were purchased. 3, any Wilderness III lots are owned by absentee owners planning to build retire nt homes in this subdivision and by our understanding are not notified of proposed final plat amendment by either the town of Oro Valley or La Rese a Homeowners Association, Without notification these homeowners have no abi ty to write an objection, attend a meeting or go along with a change that will e t their chosen community. i ,*. • ' ; �., ,1, . LtLsl. Mei 7,' . 0 .` AO. . - . 7 //477Z3-7 „ , 4,410Ww` A 2 7 1/ z 6 —.rr ..saw.. -I P. i 1 1 I 1 5 Total Lots represented: 27 Lot 1 2 6 7 9 10 18 19 20 22 24 25 27 31 32 39 40 46 48 49 50 1-T 2-T 3-T 4-T 6-T 8-T ... y - , .1 4 #' / ..swititik -., lig vf::',4441 2112154 ou.Rai 111 * . .. . gi****:..1E#l.•11 Z1140I P P ir ai•II nSroIiditdiiiliIgknhktVtwii7 4:1 . Ill�iry �i��,1r1*� pj lmN;lgtminit iiI/,itI4 61m .i- r w - \i kr •4 Nalabie ltt:c t �i ri � � c��es K Or -E'S ‘VOIN 4 \ 0;434* t 1. WI L'. 1° ......_ _wk._ 0 Nut Al* fr rik ST*Th 0 inn 1\ vors 7:0eScEitAr St WI 4 _1(ek.. L _ A nu mini • I C �� ! tit.rl�j 4 �+ 'm ,��riniun , VA*!? * ViikI ill n m u ill ��i / Sa ♦� �r�N, 010' pdec V12-87-e � � e11. � ♦#,f s , �Np�►;11IpiQ//n�l` �` r�� ffI1 � rylj►� � p ansmittie,4 4'4 ik, I# - 6 ati . 0 • * //Ili 4 ..; # \°41i i 3 ;I i , L4111••— st% • • .i NI isAIN tat sip I i , ,,,,I2(.,....iviiii-vailiv.m ,..... s imp II I1 wittallil � . a�'r^ , TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 7 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6,2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Michael Shanley, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-87-1B FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT LA RESERVE (WILDERNESS III) APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF MILE EAST OF THE ORACLE ROAD-LA RESERVE DRIVE INTERSECTION BACKGROUND In April 1987, the Mayor and Council approved an Estes Company final plat for a 135.5-acre parcel of land in the La Reserve Planned Area Development for estate-sized lots ranging from 43,931 to 324,293 sf.. A 78-acre portion of the plat was re-subdivided in 1993 (0V12-87-1A). It involved the reconfiguration of 22 lots ranging from 45,676 to 716,483 square feet in size. Today, the overall density is 3.5 acres per unit. The La Reserve entrance is at North Oracle Road and First Ave. The 22-lot subdivision access is via La Reserve Drive to Pusch Wilderness Drive, which intersects with.Buck Ridge Drive. The final plat was recorded with front yard setbacks of 30 ft.; however the PAD required a 15-ft. setback and CC&Rs specified 20 ft. as the minimum front yard setback. Staff has researched the preliminary plat and it is not evident why 30 ft. was designated as the front set back on the plat. In the past there has been one variance granted on front yard setbacks--Lot 62 requested and received a variance in order to avoid cutting into the hillside and maintain the natural drainage. SUMMARY A second request for a variance was submitted on November 6, 2000, for a 20-ft. set back on Lot 58. A variance before the Board of Adjustments is not an applicable process, since the 30-ft. setback is a plat requirement and is not required by the PAD and OVZCR. Staff suggests that the entire plat be amended to allow a 20-ft. front yard setbacks for the remaining lots. The aim is to comprehensively address this issues so future owners will not also seek variances—one by one. ISSUES The two (2) streets in the plat resemble a "wishbone" which surrounds a ridge with substantially steep slopes and terminate at two cul-de-sacs. Since the parcel is very steep, shorter driveways and building envelopes closer to the street would minimize cuts into the hillside, In fact, there is typically less than 100 ft. and often less than 50 ft. between the right-of-way property line and the steep slopes. By revising the setback from 30 ft. to 20 ft., less cut and fill would be required as a result and the impact to sensitive areas would be reduced. 'le lots are available for custom homes that will require a Type I Grading Permit to conform with Oro Valley Section 15 of the OVZCR and the La Reserve PAD. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY " OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Thero osed amendment is compatible with General. Plan Policies that promote grading to minimize p p disturbance of the natural geographic features. The plat amendment complies with all pertinent General Plan policies. RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff recommends approval of this re-plat. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve 0V12-87-1B final plat amendment for 20-foot front yard setbacks for La Reserve (Wilderness III. OR I move to approve OV 12- 87-1B final plat amendment for 20 foot front yard setbacks for La Reserve (Wilderness III) and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny 0V12-00-87-1B final plat amendment La Reserve (Wilderness III) finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Preliminary Plat map (showing steep slopes) 2. Location map • Plane . .d Zoning Administrator F:\ov\ov12\1987\12-87-1\12-87-1B amend Fsetback\TC Report.doc Co unity Deve : ment Director Town Mara: r z \ e` �t,,,, y • .,'_ ,4iir‘ ' eirgitt, .404N,,, , l •R� 40/1111011"/Fisi Ilitsitigwoilivi): 11.11.11.* 10011111Mowit A ,,,4111111r A * Arlinimpasr \II ifirooAmsw,c,fi, 111 , : la AV , 47444/14,14 /../* ., '. . '. 4:1 gill 11 11:1141 r : 4 IIS% . - : •i a lia IBINII 111 • �spilicia, 1:0P'.4,40 Wrc.DeRNEss rir \\ .\ 'r'_.�- t�;1 1 ,�' r ��-� it�l/" •�J/�� !'' f�✓,l\�.V�`%�, ,.117-1) �1j }�� y/%: /•�N'1, �•.oili,\``...1,111,1: ,� ,•I, tt .�..il,,'` 1� .v .. ,n i' '.`,. _/...I r 1;;;';� 111 1 I /; l( / l )•)// ,'C,;•".'k,?-••• ;•0.:./,, .Y,I;, 1,�Il� \, O, �;r . ',..1.. :.\�#/‘/ ,�. if, .W\ -:••••••;.-,.''--: :\�.� � .. .=- `' I ;1 �i if >' �.� (' \ •'‘)‘4'i ': - � 1114,,� 1.q).1.-- v 1�\ ' �-,. ',�111�• j•': ' ,-' 1 /// 7' �.�� ,�(1\��':-:-_ \ / / , J�., I''� J} ,III�/ =i '',\111W',' -i, . ... ,,?1,,'\:,; .% i 1 ,I `TI ' ,,,e'-'"--i7l,i :.) ../.'M.•if;„f-:ra4.,..,:.„ .:,,::,•71 „,o :,.46:.3., fp. 'II --...... t, .. .\.. 3'' 4:,f f..,,,,.,:::. .(4,:.. , . 1,, ,ii..?:_-_,_ 1 -,,r-/-_ ,,,::..t,,, i‘r.,,;.,--.,e.1 I ‘., i ))‘,1K----:-- ..!„ .,,tfrt://i., ,,- .../, , ..1 ,),(.4 i. :\.il, N ny ' ::'.-,a 1, ,i., .:.. - 1.-_-_-_. ,./-- /,, ---)-7..,7, ,,,,, „:,„(.,.\-- _, _.. ik cc:_q__:,., ,,..t ift',. q!) 1 _71 --,,,,,,' ii 1 //1//,'"/'.. •:,///if v,t . .--/X ` ` '''‘',,:ill�rTl 'R' /. ' �/ ()(?..'%'-''i. 1 '..Olt � �' �'.. ;T'k\,,�`/.....----ti4•�.j0( t. ,I • �'- ;7--, '1 1,1 /1/i.i II !�'.r / :,-././(. . ',/i 1 I , ' ,II . ` \( `'"• T� Ili- \ .:/,.. , \ '� t[if! - ,,...1,1(..;', 1•.\ /, 11.,:\ 'J,�\ '".--v.,,,' ' 1`, ;/ l�/ i ► u�� w�f'” y r. , { �\ l {' 'i.�„„Az.1 y ,if)p'1 \\ 1)II J t :. �,,,i ,,al' , • {�1'�r •~•' I i'� 1' '' b I , \ 1` \ � • Il 11 ��--i7',..�\ /,� j ij= . -=\ �� I%'�.,,�A.4JI � 1( r'1 I.,�II Y'` 4 � '' ' ' �.i. --- ‘�•1(• r \'' •` f.1 ��.. 1�'”-1�, .�. err� t}I „...i, _ 4„....._,=:,.-----,,,,,-,. ..,,,-,•. '�`- � 1`,r N dYV� �1 ,1 1\�`•1 .. ,�� ,I-� , '1 •I I ,,,„41.), ,)7,-... ., ‘..,',./-'• , .-..1' li',."/,'.1); '(i. ) ./ --.04-- ---i,, ,,,, I 1! .: . 4.- . ,!-i,..„ ..,,it,‘..,,, •! , - 24., %-.\ )// .,T,. " - ',Y- i-7-441-4 - ' Tig .e-•-•!--,I.T1.1.: it,C V, ,: ���" ` `' I',<-'' -, 18lll81��11111 / I', /� \. ,\ •; \)kiks-----, ' . 11,)-1 -6....1414". --..;tr—f,.... :,'- • ... 'A.4' �I 'T. -,cit fi!,•'. 1�M�•��••�' :r- s ) .1(( rl\\-.,‘," .--- A, - . 1. ` ,),--,,,, ,,,, .9ce‘' 4011‘40''..."1:/:Y,'..0 .'\\:''' .\''N 'I's.. AVAVII .4111111%1Vea.,%0W..... \'1' I.: sVi,/II() ). ., 11 .:,, ,,,,. . ..,,,.,..,...k,/ ,..:,, . -,.,, ig..,.,.-.:-,,,,,-..:-,. ., e:_------- \\-, ,,.\\,::-.) .: -,,,,\‘‘. ..\v- , ,,, .... • -.- ..,LA. ,i /. • , 1 �i.-,.-.�.'��1 1, �...� �//T '1 !t`vQ.,• :..-•',-.=-/•,.:.... ,�, :� \,. ,\. �\, , ',�\' '.\ a 1 --7- +01• ` , r�: L•, \, -.. - .. :.:-�, 1 � 1 :,i)1‘..,.,,c N4,'...:_, ,.i. ' ' \.4 0 . .tik. -=-.-7--_,-A),-lis...5,,° 1 ..:. ". .1.----"-<4.60-14 \'It' .14!"i .7-7— 'it �,,.��''+�"Vied l;�J �' A.1st \lull 111, ,,,(0( -. ) ,:, �' _,,, r. , z.,,.. -9,-•'- -7!!7: •"t • i'i.,(ci•'.-'•. , 1 j)(')Y•1 A N Vtrli.--..-vAle**10/Pry''' ',/ -. y .41-.- .---.. .'..c‘'.0 i r i falitt- -----j'-'1-1-1 .''' %3'\\--:/ - :T (61)') '/, ,-., 4 , ,/,1 ,,st. , i 4./\--1.taLli,,m ,4/,,i.-,./ 5,,,e,,, ,:,,,._. -7=- '\\, •'' ( I„.4.____...11---12-_---1. 1‘,_- __ :) .: •'.' ., , .,/,,, -:-. ••i il''.'`,,,,' i , •-:.;.Alialtosigi ArArryirx/'•:/V::';-.4,1 'w. .•,,,,,,4,y,' ____,- :„,. ''•••-4 ry i.‘ -, _•------_,-.-_ ,. 6c /i r .-‘'••-'• L�`7,--1.." "-77) •, 1' \ //r•/,,111 /, / r - .,1 ,�----...:- • Q` •1 \ ,, ....._\_,_,I . , ;��l� `\J -Y •••j 1 7:. .. .. tik! .� I 4\I.)! Altti --:::--_-,-- 11 tet' ► l/ J�1 > v .7.1k.„__. .:_ :,, )A,r / 1 , tIl7,4 ________-:,-7---it.,:--, ilt \\_., '.---7---, ,,-..2; 181t: s i 1.� w1 ,L---,-7,- .. �. �. .�� !� , �" ;' `.'f ,. ., \ i ' ;..;. /?--.', . '\\::,( .i%', k.,;.;,,,_,,,,,.,,,__________. ___:„.,,,,, ':,:.-,s, ,s\, s \\ . \-'..t. ,,,,, , , (. i ,.,e; ,N,--_, ' . ,, , Ilik , -,_:,-----.:-..„.—_. -,,N„,,, ‘\\\\ _:c.„, i , ,\, : , 1.; , . . .1,.. ‘,..3 ..,,, 1 Assi,. „L-_::„f, ' ....,,,, ,Nv,\,,,\,‘ 1 ,‘ .. ,:•-\_/f.I f i\ ' '...F. 7111k - ,..71.,,,...,,,,--7_____-- ''-,''N'\'\1;•:\, '..111 1.' A ,),'',' : .''fr,...'-j..',.\\.k‘ / -----------,../. \i3O A \. \h 1: 4.: i' .-_ ,,,,, ,.:-.i: -:;:-... '.•,' ' '-----------:-'"'"'"; .. "--T-----,--- ' ''' '‘ , • \I ' 1, !jf i---'-iNi, '''.';A: ./7,:..1''4 ' VI \I11mit - I '//, d Oil;• .•_ iii'r./�. 1 .„401 ' -,-) ,14 P,40r , is -/� •ti :� r 01 .,S---t-ti--------)- � =—=fir i' ) Q..-,-,--:—\----7\_,\ r ! , 4MA --- 1 ti :f \\ .,,,., ,-..,.: ,,i ` ,.. / i (� /`- err,,` „,./ / iii '' ' .V r".;kety- • • -.' ' , 1, /), k\,,,0 ie.' -,:r;- ,.:.-- ..,.::-..?. /// A ci , ... /..,,,- 4.---.o 4'4'.-4,-..-.Rsiirk .' -/-.-.-2:- . ,1.r, ° i . n ,c1 p 7,3', 73 . .\ v"ii:. • / ' -.4;4' -...' #P4-)f 4 i -'''14''...*''' 0''''-•I.. e, 17 .-4 • 9y1 AY\ ;I', •- , • •n-•-,, • '''‘:, -1 ,.0,E, > , \, l�< y .77-- / .?''. • , �c .�1� • '3 mac. si.)11 � 'Q , N k gg --‘ ; ',ye rif)7.:.'441/frficitiis-q - .':s*,;,11grf,._,A.,-vi,!!....../..,,. ..*.,,,,,,,,,,:2 0, ... -. \ 1/'I ,"4(1(4.-,if.- W.,/,'",....;:,.....Ta'‘.11..1.);/ —,...;:";-/ 17 ' / ..---- , ii id;ii. ' .ttoi._ ,,,.,i,- ' i ,„:„ti.,,A,t, .,,... . , ,, , . • .. ., `.� Z S _..��-�_-4,,s, -,, 6i. •• .......:::;...._•,,,,, !..it , 41 j 40,e;,,.kfir,_1, -joritteatk. , ,,,,s1,1„,1 : i,gic •....., i .:-. -,, ,.A-:: 1i4' Rr�'� TCE-SEEBELOb.1\' !III� I ti f I I ! g -_,._,--------, , , ; ,, war,: g \:":k, -II III di l 111)"11 ' Aik , I 4:7"` r>'51.-4 , , ,i t,"*.pm; . „._ t, 4.,81\•7 K -- r7tk, ei. ithi,r-"alt olt." a- ' • - o . ' .>. �-,�lam: _ w 11/1///111 0194 41, � � ± 1 � r ii\ „ . ,� s 'i 1 4 t ft,..,\ y ,� ze/ :4... )4, '''It*7-1:' - '"4".°47N4N\ ill) i /..:A., ,,,,F( . ,, .1 , ((y. .\ - , ,iti, / 1 If/ ' s,' • I eg.' . 6-i • 1,,• ii j 1:,:tAft•Til.)1 d;,/,r, t .t ° 11 . 1°I.C\ L-,_:-.-'------ 41.):171 Z/tikl:frnljti/iit '.; — . '1 / t'• or / , s ) 1. -- 'i 7 '' '4 ,7,1:',..i:-_-____ __-:_'___---.7)i,/, 4; , ', P ftli 41,7 4,,' 4 '1 itO i/ /,, :_ , - ,:1:;;-..,_-_,,,--1---_- ,i / ,//i.,.--)-7)/1,,,,- ; ...i0 /. 4 . -I r. Z4/' I/ __-- .-_-_-: c' ' -- ....---,....,-_-- -.--1,.,•. ii ,e,ii.: ,,-,0, 04„,,, . ,,, 4- 1 "Z' / //i. ,, g 0 -,,, , , ./.. 40 ,f'-A\ y � •'�4 �' �---_•— ,./l iii �Y�'�W(Y�`��/ //' l 7,4, f ___. ,, ,„/ pa w Ihr lir .r 7 ..:7:,- vs. I -,;7i /r i, ,i '''l, /,1 4 . 17i-1. S • i1 J I • //Ai t- I I / r i / t.�I, �� 1'. , 4zi , I a. 4 - largityip , Ri . 1 ,-;.g :',.. .1,t, k p )1g,;,1mllIi, m• l 4.,:,;�1',rt'''t, �' SUPPLEMENTAL FOR ITEM #6 _'L•_ OP. ti 2:17 --EXCERPT OF-- MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11, 000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: 6:08 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present Jim Vogelsberg, Chair Jeff Weatherford,Member Richard Underwood,Member Barbara Bell,Member Vincent Baiocchetti,Member Nancy Mager,Member Absent ice Enger,Member Others Present: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner Bryant Nodine,Planning and Zoning Administrator Dan Dudley, Town Attorney Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director Craig Civalier,PE Bob Conant Planner H Michael Shanley,Planner I Sangeeta Jain,Planner I David Ro n illo,Planner Tech. DRAFT qu Shirley Gay,DRB Clerk REGULAR AGENDA OV12-00-20A RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT INTERPRETATION REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WITH SLOPES 25% AND GREATER Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator introduced the staff report into the record. Mr. „Iodine briefly reviewed previous cases in Rancho Vistoso involving slopes 25% and greater. He _,plained that if the PAD addresses an issue, the issue is handled by the PAD. If the issue is not addressed, then the code takes over. He remarked that staff tries to be consistent in applying that rationale in all PADs throughout the Town. Mr. Nodine explained that the RV PAD places very Y 11 Development 14-00 Develo Review Board Minutes Page 2 in areas of 25% slope or greater. restrictive limits on developmentsIt does not deal with exceptions and development anydevelo ment in these areas. Staffs recommendation is to establish criteria for development in areas in Rancho Vistoso PAD that have slopes 25% and greater. Charles Hulsey, WLB representing Groupre resentin Vistoso Partners commented that Mr. Nodine is correct in needs a standard togo b . It is Mr. Hulsey's understanding and the way it was shown saying the Town e Y to him on the project first roject he did within the PAD, which was RV NB SE -High Mesa. When Mr. how to obtain access for that project, he was told that he could cross the 25% slope Hulsey asked staff If he did encroach on the 25% slope building pad, or with a driveway, he had to with the roadway. compensate the Town with buildable area else where on a one to one basis. He commented he did not have to compensate if it was a roadway. What WLB has done in the past in areas that encroached on building pads, is to dedicate to the Town areas designated as open space to compensate for being able to ° slope areas. Mr. Hulseyaddressed the standards that staff wants to establish. He said encroach in 25/o s op he would like a definition of what "minor" means on the fourth criteria, and on number five he objected to "including roads" on trade off areas as he has not had to do that in the past. Member U nderwood asked staff, what the rationale was for including roads in the trade off areas? Mr. replied that was done to insure that if there were a road not already shown in the PAD, that was to be put in, there would be compensation for disturbing the area. Member Baiocchetti suggested adding the words "may be allowed" to criteria four. Member.atherfo rd asked for clarification on "including roads" in criteria five. Mr. Nodine replied that the intent was, "for roads not designated in the PAD". Chair Vogelsberg opened the public hearing: The following citizens spoke: Hector Conde, 14040 N. Lobelia Jim Kriegh, 40 E. Calle Concordia Patty Estes, 11700 N. Joi Dr. Carl Boswell 11700 N. Joi Dr. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place Moved, seconded (BaiocchettilMager) and carried by 2-4 vote to recommend denial of MOTION: O V12-00-20A Rancho Vistoso Interpretation. Baiocchetti - Yes, Bell - No, Chair Vogelsberg - No, Mager- Yes, Weatherford No, Underwood - No.Motion Failed MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Weatherford) and carried by a 4-2 vote to recommend approval of OV12-00-20A, Rancho Vistoso PAD Interpretation, stipulating criteria four the words maybe allowed added after "greater sloped areas" and criteria five "after encroachments" add g including designated roads not in the PAD. Baiocchetti - No, Bell - Yes, Chair Vogelsberg - Yes, Mager- No, Weatherford - Yes, Underwood -Yes. 8TOWN OF ORO VALLEY } COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: Dec. 6th, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CHUCK SWEET, TOWN MANAGER DATE: November 22, 2000 SUBJ: Town of Oro Valley Policy with respect to the use of Town Facilities for Telecommunication Equipment SUMMARY: This agenda item is on tonight's agenda at the request of Vice Mayor LaSala, in g g pp order to provide an opportunity for the Town Council to re-examine the Town's policy regardprivate in to businesses leasing space on Town property for telecommunication purposes. Severalg ears ago when the technology of cell phones began to hit mainstream y was America, Oro Valleyapproached by cell phone providers about the use of pp town facilities, such as Town Hall, ballfield light standards at Dennis Weaver Park and/or reservoir sites managed by Oro Valley's water utility. The Town Council at that time made the decision that town property should NOT be used for such telecommunication devices and should only be located on private property and in a stealth appearance. Since the establishment of this town policy the town has continued to grow, especially in the northern portion of the town. During the past several months the p Y town has received numerous complaints from citizens who experience "dropped calls" on a regular basis throughout the town limits. As a result of the complaints received and the numerous advances that have takenlace in this industry during the last several years, Vice Mayor LaSala p organized a meeting on Friday, November 17tr, with some of the cell phone g providers. This meeting was held to address provider's needs and their willingness to work with the town on this issue. The discussion at the meeting 9 was very positive, with cell phone providers indicating a willingness to work with the town to address the cell phone service needs of Oro Valley citizens and at the same time respecting the aesthetic qualities of the community. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: Dec. 6th, 2000 Page 3 SUGGESTED MOTION: I make a motion to direct the Town Manager to return to the Town Council at the February regular 2001 re ular meeting with a Resolution that would establish a newolic for the use of Town of Oro Valley property for cellular phone service in p Y an equitable manner. Additionally, the motion is to include direction to the Town Managerto prepareRequest for Proposal process about this issue that the a q Council could review on February 7th, 2001. TOWN MANAGER 12-15-3 Compensation to Town Each license granted under this Article is subject to the Town's right, which is expressly reserved, to annually fix a fair and reasonable compensation to be paid for the property rights granted to the licensees; provided, nothing in this Article shall prohibit the Town and a licensee from agreeing to the compensation to be paid. (Ord. No. 97-03, Rep&ReEn, 02/05/97) COMMUNICATION STRUCTURES & FACILITIES Sec. 13-700 ARTICLE 13-7 COMMUNICATION STRUCTURES & FACILITIES Sec. 13-700 Introduction ervice for it's citizens. While the Town The Town recognizes the need for communication facilities as a s a clear vision that future growth and change, the General Plan provides Low density, growthis characterized by rapid physical nvironment...+semphasezed tY "projectresidential/resort character where the living e that vision. a growth are Important elements of orderly and environmentally sensitive installation of communication facilities section to permit orderly and appropriate in isthe intent of this - � ns Act of 1996. As such, all minor It compliance with the Telecommunications the Development Review inthe Town, in p shall be subject to approval by for communication facilities, as described below, Town Council approval is required Board. Planning and Zoning.Commission ommiss+on recommendation and facilities requiring a Conditional Use Permit. all ensure that the built environment is aesthetically General Plan, "to enthe In keeping with Goal 9.1 of the �� this Article observes the requirements with the natural surroundings , e visual impact created by pleasing and compatibleforth buidelines that minimize the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and sets residential and commercial purposes are . communication facilities Requirements for antenna used for also covered by this Section. Sec. 13-701 Pur ose guidelines for the siting and design is toprovide regulations and developmentsafety and welfare, The purpose of this section Valley, while protecting public health, sa ty communication facilties in the Town of Oro ter of the Town. of pleasing aesthetic character preserving the rural, scenic and visually p g and pre g Sec. 13-702 Antenna The following devices are permitted in all districts provided the following standards are met: s which are buildingmounted or ground mounted are Standards: Antenna A. Residential Antenna subject to the following conditions: permitted in all residential zoning districts, 1. Ground Mounted: mounted satellite dish that is 1 meter 3.28 feet) or less in diameter, with a. A ground a maximum height of five feet. tandin ole antennas are limited to the building height allowed in the b. Free s g p applicable zone. . Location. •� All ground mounted antennas are to be located in the rear yard, unless c 13 - 16 Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised Sec. 13-702 COMMUNICATION STRUCTURES & FACILITIES rear yard location provides an indirect line of site to the satellite, in which case may Allapp licable setbacks for accessory buildings shall be located in the side yard. apply. satellite dishes shall be screened Screening. All ground mounted up to five feet with a solid wall or landscaping, so as not to be visible from adjacent properties. screened e. Color. Antennas that are notby fully a wall or landscaping are prohibited to be a neutral from being either white or iridescent in color, and are encouraged color. Fully screened antenna may be of any color. 2. Building Mounted: dish that is 1 meter (3.28 feet) or less in diameter and a. A building mounted satelliteuch antenna building mounted antenna shall be permitted in any zoning district. 5 shall be fully screened. b. Color. Fully screened antenna may be of any color. g c. Height. The maximum height of the antenna shall be the minimum height necessary for reception of radio waves. 3. Amateur Radio Equipment. Such equipment permitted e ui ment is in all residential zones, provided the following standards are met: a. The maximumheightequipment,of the e uipment, whether a fixed or "crank up" style structure,including antenna, shall be 50', measured from the ground to the fully operational extent of the equipment. b. The equipment tower and e u i ment shall only be located in the rear yard. c. There shall be a setback ratio of one to one (one foot of setback for each foot in height from all buildings, property lines and overhead wires. all be operated only by a Federally licensed amateur radio d. The equipment sh p operator. q e. The base of the equipment shall not exceed a size greater than 4' by 4'. exceeding 1 meter diameter. Approval from the Development Review 4. Satellite Dishes e g Board at a regularly scheduled meeting, is required for all ground or building mounted satellite dish antennas that are over 1 meter in diameter. The following standards are required: a. A maximum diameter of 15 feet will be permitted. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised 13 - 17 (Rev.2/97) -s COMMUNICATION STRUCTURES & FACILITIES Sec. 13-702 b. Ground mounted satellite dishes exceeding 1 meter in diameter are permitted only in the rear yard, unless rear yard location provides an indirect line of site to the satellite, in which case may be located in the side yard. c. A minimum two-thirds of the satellite dish must be screened with either landscaping or a solid wall. d. The maximum elevation of the foundation for ground mounted antenna is not to exceed 1 foot. e. Height. The maximum height of building mounted antenna that are over 1 meter in diameter shall be the minimum height that is necessary for reception of radio waves. f. Application submittals shall include an application, a site plan, dimensions of the antenna, and justification for need. B. Commercial Antenna Standards. Antennas which are building mounted or ground mounted are permitted in all commercial zoning districts, subject to the following conditions: 1. Ground Mounted: a. A ground mounted receive or transmission satellite dish that is 2 meters (6.56 feet) or less in diameter, and up to five feet in height, in a commercial or industrial zone. b. Free standing pole Antennas are limited to the building height allowed in the applicable zone. c. Location. All ground mounted antennas are to be located in the rear yard, unless rear yard location provides an indirect line of site to the satellite, in which case may be located in the side yard. All applicable setbacks for accessory buildings shall apply. • d. Screening. All ground mounted satellite dishes shall be screened five feet up from the ground with a solid wall or landscaping, so as not to be visible from adjacent properties. e. Color. Antenna that are not screened by a wall or landscaping are prohibited from being either white or iridescent in color, and are to be a neutral color. Fully screened antenna may be of any color. 2. Building Mounted: a. A building mounted receive or transmission antennae, or satellite dish that is 2 meters (6.56 feet) or less in diameter, shall be allowed to be mounted on the roof. Such antennae shall be fully screened from the road and adjacent property, in a commercial or industrial zone. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised 13 - 18 (Rev.2/97) Sec. 13-702 COMMUNICATION STRUCTURES & FACILITIES b. Color. Fully screened antenna may be of any color. 3. Satellite Dishes exceeding 2 meters in diameter. Approval from the Development Review Board, at a regularly scheduled meeting, is required for all ground or building mounted satellite dish antennas that are over 2 meters in diameter. The following standards and materials shall be included with an application for DRB review: a. A maximum diameter of 15 feet will be permitted. b. Ground mounted satellite dishes are permitted only in the rear yard, unless rear yard location provides an indirect line of site to the satellite, in which case may be located in the side yard. c. A minimum two-thirds of the satellite dish must be screened with either landscaping or a solid wall. d. The maximum elevation of the foundation for ground mounted antenna is not to exceed 1 foot. e. Height. The maximum height of building mounted antenna that are over 2 meters in diameter shall be the minimum height that is necessary for reception of radio waves. f. Application submittals shall include an application, a site plan, dimensions of the antenna, and justification for need. Sec. 13-703 Communication Facilities A. Applicability: No communications facility shall be erected or installed except in compliance with the provisions of this Section. The provisions of this Section apply to all communications equipment, whether such equipment_ is used as a main use or an accessory use. Where conflicts exist between this Section and the remainder of the Code, the more restrictive Section shall apply. B. Minor Communication Facilities: 1. Standards for Minor Facilities. Minor Facilities are permitted in all zones with Development Review Board approval. All of the following criteria shall be met for a minor facility; otherwise, it will be considered a major facility: a. All minor facilities shall be constructed using STEALTH applications (camouflaging) for the antennae. b. All minor facilities shall either be located on existing buildings, poles or other Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised 13 - 19 (Rev.2;97) -� COMMUNICATION STRUCTU RES & FACILITIES Sec. 13-703 existing support ort structures, or shall be ground mounted up to a maximum of 20 feet in height. c. The camouflaging of antennas shall include architectural integration, painting and texturing to match the existing structure, or if ground mounted, of such design to be compatibly integrated with the surrounding landscape. STEALTH camouflaging of p Y g ground mounted antennas may include such designs as cactus and desert trees. d. Antennas mounted on architecturally significant structures or significant architectural details of the building shall be covered by appropriate casings which are designed to match existing architectural features found on the building. e. Where feasible, antennas can be placed directly above, below or incorporated with vertical design elements of a building to help in camouflaging. f. Ground mounted minor communication facilities shall be setback one foot for every one foot in height from buildings, property lines and overhead wires. q E uipment buildings or structures shall be concealed from public view and made g compatible with the architecture of the surrounding buildings and consistent with the general character of the area. Shelters shall be landscaped to be consistent with surrounding features. h. Equipment buildings must be placed in compliance with the underlying zoning setbacks for accessory buildings. i. The equipment building or structure must be regularly maintained. 2. Application R uirements. The applicant shall follow the requirements set forth in.Sec. 3- PP � 302 and 3-303 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. In addition, the following shall be included with an application for a minor facility (the Building Code Department shall be informed of the application to determine if a building permit and inspection are required): a. A Communication Facility Plan shall be prepared and submitted for Development Review Board approval to include, but is not limited to: 1. A site plan showing location and dimensions of all antenna, towers, equipment structures and parking. Elevations and details of the STEALTH application shall be provided to demonstrate the camouflaging. 2. Native Plant Salvage and Landscape Plans, as required. 3. A photo simulation of the project, showing the proposed addition of the camouflaged antenna to the building, structure or landscape treatment. 4. The applicant shall submit written documentation demonstrating that the NIER Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised 13 - 20 (Rev.2/97) Sec. 13-703 COMMUNICATION STRUCTURES & FACILITIES emissions from the proposed project are within the limits set by the FCC. 5. The project must demonstrate it will have minimal visual impact. C. Major Communication Facilities (those facilities that are over 20' in height) are subject to a conditional use permit, as outlined in Sec. 9-1 17 (Communication Facilities). Once a Use Permit has been obtained, a Communication Facility Plan shall be prepared and submitted for Development Review Board approval. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised 13 - 21 (Rev.2/97) I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1 0 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Dan Dudley, Town Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R) 00- 106 ; making those certain documents, Oro Valley Town Code Article 11- 4, Parking, and Article 11-6, Commercial Vehicles, (relating to the regulation of traffic and motor vehicles by regulating the standing and/or parking of motor vehicles and by limiting the weight of commercial vehicles upon all but certain streets designated as truck routes), a public record. SUMMARY: Presented is the amendment to Article 11-4, Parking, and Artilce 11-6, Commercial Vehicles, which is declared to be a public record and which will remain on file in the Town Clerk's office as a public record for at least thirty (30) days thereafter at which time Ordinance No. (0) 0 - will be brought before the Council for consideration and action. Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute § 28-627, the Town has the authority, with respect to streets and highways under its jurisdiction and within the reasonable exercise of police power, to regulate the standing or parking of vehicles. The Town also has the authority to place and maintain traffic control devices to carry out local traffic ordinances which regulate or guide traffic, and regulate the operation of commercial vehicles upon Town 3adways. In addition, the Town has the authority to designate the following Town roadways as truck routes: Oracle Road; Tangerine Road; La Canada Drive; First Avenue from Oracle Road to Lambert Lane; and Lambert Lane from First Avenue to La Canada Drive in accordance with Arizona Revised Statute § 28-627(A)(11). Ordinance No. (0) 0 - will provide regulation of the standing and parking of vehicles upon Town roadways and other property, will regulate and guide traffic, will regulate the operation of commercial vehicles, and will provide for specific truck routes, all of which will preserve the peace, health, and safety of the Town. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mayor and Council approve Resolution No. (R) 00 - ; , which makes the amendment to the Oro Valley Town Code Chapter 11, Traffic; Motor Vehicles, a public record. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the adoption of Resolution No. (R) 00 - 106. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. (R) 00 -106 Oro Valley Town Code Amendment of Article 11-4, Parking, and Article 11-6, Commercial Vehicles. 1 , I i;, i / , 0.,,, ,441. 1:. _ ' _,, L Town •tto RESOLUTION NO. (R) 00- 106 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS PUBLIC RECORDS THOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK AND ENTITLED "ARTICLE 11-4, PARKING" AND "ARTICLE 11-6, COMMERCIAL VEHICLES," OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, that those certain documents entitled "Article 11-4, Parking" and "Article 11-6, Commercial Vehicles," of the Oro Valley Town Code," three copies of which are on file in the office of the Town Clerk, are hereby declared to be public records, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with the Town Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 6th day of December , 2000. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney Ch 11 Public Record Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 11.21.2000 ORDINANCE NO. (0) 0 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF TRAFFIC AND MOTOR VEHICLES BY REGULATING THE STANDING AND/OR PARKING OF MOTOR VEHICLES; BY LIMITING THE WEIGHT OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN EXCESS OF 18,000 POUNDS GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT UPON ALL BUT CERTAIN STREETS DESIGNATED AS TRUCK ROUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALITIES THEREOF; AMENDING ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE CHAPTER 11 BY REFERENCE; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, AND RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY MATURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER. WHEREAS, on September 27, 1989, the Town Council did approve Ordinance Number (0) 89-21, which adopted that certain document entitled, "Oro Valley Town Code, Chapter 11, Traffic; Motor Vehicles," as the eleventh chapter of the official Town Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to ARS § 28-627, the Town has authority, with respect to streets and highways under its jurisdiction and within the reasonable exercise of the police power, to regulate the standing or parking of vehicles; and WHEREAS, pursuant to ARS § 28-627(A)(11), the Town has the authority to designate Town roadways as truck routes; and WHEREAS, the Town has the authority to regulate the operation of commercial vehicles upon Town roadways; and WHEREAS, penalties are provided for violating any provision of this Article which regulates the time, place, or method of parking a vehicle; and WHEREAS, the Town has deemed it necessary to amend Chapter 11 in order to provide regulations relative to parking and standing of vehicle and general vehicular traffic in order to preserve the peace, health, and safety of the roadways in the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and the Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, as follows: Ch 11 Amendment (10) Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 11.22.2000 SECTION 1. That certain document known as "Article 11-4, Parking," of the Oro Valley Town Code, three copies of which are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, which document was made a public record by Resolution No. (R) 00 - of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, is hereby referred to, adopted, and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Ordinance. SECTION 2. That certain document known as "Article 11-6, Commercial Vehicles," of the Oro Valley Town Code, three copies of which are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, which document was made a public record by Resolution No. (R) 00 - of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, is hereby referred to, adopted, and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Ordinance. SECTION 3. Pursuant to ARS § 9-803, any penalty clause contained in a code or public record, adopted by reference, shall be set forth in full in the adopting ordinance as follows: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the penalty for violating any provision of Articles 11-4 Parking and 11-6 Commercial Vehicles, which regulates the time, place, or method of parking a vehicle and regulates the weight of commercial vehicles upon all but certain streets designated as truck routes, shall be a mandatory fine of eighty ($80.00) dollars, no part of which may be suspended or waived by the court. This fine includes assessments imposed by the state pursuant to ARS §§ 12-116.01 and 12-116.02. SECTION 4. Pursuant to ARS § 41-1346, the governing body of each county, city, town, or other political subdivision shall maintain efficient record management for local public records and it has been determined that this Ordinance is a public record with three copies of said Ordinance to remain on file in the office of the Town Clerk. SECTION 5. All Oro Valley Ordinances, Resolutions, or Motions and parts of Ordinances, Resolutions, or Motions of the Council in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof Ch 11 Amendment (10) Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 11.22.2000 PASSED AND ADOPTED by Mayor and Town Council, the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this day of , 2000. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ATTEST: Paul H. Loomis, Mayor Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney Ch 11 Amendment (10) Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 11.22.2000 ARTICLE 11-4 PARKING 11-4-1 Method of Parking 11-4-2 Authority to Erect Signs Restricting Parking 11-4-3 Stopping, Standing, or Parking Prohibited 11-4-4 Nuisance Parking 11-4-5 Penalty 11-4-6 Presumption 11-4-1 Method of Parking Except as otherwise provided by resolution of the Council, every vehicle stopped or parked upon a roadway where there are adjacent curbs shall be so stopped or parked with the right hand wheels of such vehicle parallel to and within eighteen (18") inches of the right hand curb. 11-4-2 Authority to Erect Signs Restricting Parking A. Pursuant to ARS § 28-643 and within the reasonable exercise of the Oro Valley Police power, the local authority shall place and maintain the traffic control devices on highways under their jurisdiction as they deem necessary to indicated and to carry out local traffic ordinances or to regulate, warn, or guide traffic. All traffic control devices erected shall conform to the manual and specifications prescribed in ARS § 28-641. B. The Police Chief or Town Engineer, upon approval by the Council, may erect signs requiring parking at an angle to the curb, allowing parking on the left hand curb on one-way streets, notifying drivers that parking is prohibited, and restricting parking in any way that may be necessary. No parking restrictions shall become effective until such restricted parking area is specifically designated by resolution of the Council and signs have been erected or written notice given as authorized by this Section; provided, that all signs restricting parking now in place are hereby ratified and approved as so placed. It is a civil traffic violation for any person to stop or stand a vehicle in disobedience to such parking restrictions. C. In lieu of providing signage, the Town may attach a written notice to the owner of record of the vehicle, giving the responsible individual twenty-four (24) hours to remove the vehicle. Ch 11 Amendment (10) Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 11.22.2000 11-4-3 Stopping, Standing, or Parking Prohibited A. Handicapped Parking Spots 1. Pursuant to ARS § 28-884 and except as provided in subsection (4) of this Section, no person may stop, stand, or park a motor vehicle within any specially designated and marked parking space provided in accordance with this Section for physically disabled persons unless the motor vehicle is transporting a person eligible for the distinguishing insignia placard or number plates bearing the international wheelchair symbol, and either a)the motor vehicle displays the distinguishing insignia placard; or b) the motor vehicle displays number plates bearing the international wheelchair symbol. 2. If a law enforcement officer employed by the Town finds a motor vehicle in violation of this Section, the officer shall issue a complaint, which shall be attached or placed upon the vehicle, which is unlawfully parked. Upon a finding that an owner or operator is responsible for a violation of this Section, the court shall impose a civil sanction of not less than eighty ($80) dollars nor greater than two hundred fifty ($250) dollars for such violation. 3. Any person who is chauffeuring a physically disabled person shall be allowed, without a distinguishing insignia placard or number plates bearing the international wheelchair symbol, to park momentarily in any such parking space for the purpose of loading or unloading such physically disabled person. No complaint shall be issued to the driver for such momentary parking. 4. Parking spaces reserved for handicapped persons shall be designated on privately owned property as provided by the Oro Valley Zoning Code. Each such parking space shall be prominently outlined with paint and posted with a permanent sign located not less than three (3) feet nor more than six (6) feet above the grade and of a color and design approved by the department of transportation bearing the internationally accepted wheelchair symbol and the caption "reserved parking." The designation of such parking spaces as provided herein or as required pursuant to the Oro Valley Zoning Code, shall authorize police officer, and other duly authorized agents, to enforce the provisions of this Section and shall constitute a waiver of any objection by the owner or person in possession of such property to the enforcement of this Section, and such owner shall be deemed to have consented by such designation or person in possession. B. Storing Vehicles on Public Property 1. Stored vehicle means any vehicle, trailer, or semitrailer of a type subject to registration pursuant to ARS § 28-101 et seq., which has been left within the right-of-way of a highway, road, street, or public thoroughfare, or upon public property, without being moved, for an extended period of time. Evidence that a Ch 11 Amendment (10) Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 11.22.2000 vehicle was left unattended or unmoved for a period of forty-eight (48) hours shall be prima facie evidence that the vehicle was being stored. 2. No person shall store a vehicle upon any street, highway, road, other public thoroughfare, or other public property. The storing of any vehicle in a manner as provided for in this subsection, shall constitute a presumption that the last registered owner of record is responsible for such storage. The last registered owner shall be subject to the provisions of this Article unless an affidavit has been filed reporting the vehicle as being stolen, or a stolen report has been accepted by a local law enforcement agency, and a violation of this subsection constitutes a civil traffic offense. The provisions of ARS § 28-872 shall apply in all respects to the removal, towing, storage, and sale of stored vehicles impounded under this subsection. C. Blocking Traffic 1. It is a civil traffic violation for any person to stop, stand, or park any motor vehicle, or other vehicle, upon a street in the Town in such a manner or under such conditions as to leave available less than twenty (20') feet of the width of the roadway for the free movement of vehicular traffic, except that a person may stop temporarily, in the actual loading or unloading of passengers or, when necessary, in the observance of traffic signs or signals. 2. It is a civil traffic violation for any person to park a motor vehicle, or other vehicle, within an alley or entrance to a private driveway except for the loading or unloading of materials, and not then unless such loading or unloading can be accomplished without blocking the alley to the free movement of vehicular traffic. 11-4-4 Nuisance Parking 1. Parking for Display or Repairs. It is unlawful to park a vehicle upon any roadway for the purpose of a) washing, greasing, or repairing such vehicle except for immediate repairs necessitated by an emergency and necessary to be made before the vehicle can be moved; or b) displaying commercial exhibits, except by special permit lawfully issued by the Town. 2. Parking on Property of Another. It is unlawful for the driver of a motor vehicle to park the vehicle in or upon property of another without having in the driver's possession the written permission of the person legally entitled to possession of the property. However, a citation charging violation of this Section shall be dismissed if the aforesaid written permission is subsequently presented to the court. Ch 11 Amendment (10) Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 11.22.2000 3. Parking on Town-Owned Property. No person shall park a motor vehicle in or on Town-owned property, other than public streets or alleys, when signs prohibiting or regulating parking have been placed thereon by the director of transportation as authorized by this Article, unless in compliance with such erected signs. 4. Parking in Parks and Playgrounds. It is unlawful to park a motor vehicle in or upon the parks and playgrounds of the Town except in designated and signed parking areas. 5. Parking for Purposes of Sale on Unpaved Lots. It is unlawful to park a motor vehicle for the purpose of sale upon any lot or area, which is not paved, within the Town. The display of any signs or other markings indicating that a motor vehicle is for sale shall be prima facie evidence that the motor vehicle has been parked for the purpose of sale. This Section shall not apply to a maximum of one (1) motor vehicle parked for the purpose of sale where the owner of the lot owns the motor vehicle or area on which the motor vehicle is parked. 6. Parking Over-sized Vehicles. No person shall park or store a commercially registered vehicle with a chassis rated for more than one (1)ton nor any vehicle greater than twenty-two (22') feet in length on streets or alleys in a residential area or zone except while loading, unloading, delivering, or making a service call at a residence. 7. Sidewalks. It is a civil traffic violation for any person to park any vehicle, whether in usable condition or not, or for an owner to permit his vehicle to be parked upon any sidewalk in the Town. 11-4-5 Penalty Unless otherwise specifically provided, the penalty for violating any provision of this Article, which regulates the time, place, or method of parking a vehicle shall be a mandatory fine of eighty ($80.00) dollars, no part of which may be suspended or waived by the court. This fine includes assessments imposed by the state pursuant to ARS §§ 12- 116.01 and 12-116.02. 11-4-6 Presumption In any prosecution charging a violation of any of the provisions of this Article, the person in whose name such vehicle is registered shall be prima facie responsible for such violation and subject to the penalty therefor. Ch 11 Amendment (10) Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 11.22.2000 ARTICLE 11-6 COMMERCIAL VEHICLES 11-6-1 Commercial Vehicles 11-6-2 Truck Routes 11-6-3 Penalty 11-6-1 Commercial Vehicles A. No person shall operate any commercial vehicle exceeding eighteen thousand (18,000) pounds gross vehicle weight at any time upon any Town streets except those streets or parts of streets described in this Section as truck routes; except as provided for in this Section. B. A person operating a commercial vehicle may leave an adopted truck route by the nearest route to travel a distance no greater than three-fourths (3/4) of a mile and in so doing not crossing another truck route to make a single delivery or pickup after which they must return immediately by the nearest route. 11-6-2 Truck Routes A. Pursuant to ARS § 28-627(A)(11) and within the reasonable exercise of the Oro Valley police power,the following streets are hereby designated as truck routes: Oracle Road; Tangerine Road; Rancho Vistoso Boulevard; La Canada Drive; First Avenue from Oracle Road to Lambert Lane; and Lambert Lane from First Avenue to La Canada Drive. B. Pursuant to ARS § 28-627(C), provisions of this Section are not effective until signs giving notice of the local traffic regulations are posted on or at the entrances to the highway or part of the highway affected as is most appropriate. 11-6-3 Penalty Unless otherwise specifically provided, the penalty for violating any provision of this Article, which regulates by limiting the weight of commercial vehicles upon all but certain streets designated as truck routes, shall be a mandatory fine of eighty ($80.00) dollars, no part of which may be suspended or waived by the court. This fine includes assessments imposed by the state pursuant to ARS §§ 12-116.01 and 12-116.02. Ch 11 Amendment (10) Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 11.22.2000 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager SUBJ: Discussion and/or Possible Action Relating to the Possible Relocation of the Oro Valley Library Project from Naranja/La Canada Drive to the Copper Creek Ridge Park Location and/or Naranja Town Site Location SUMMARY: This item has been placed on the Amended Agenda for this evening's meeting by Mayor Loomis. The Library Project is at a point where the Town is ready to commit funds for the design of the secondary access to Naranja Road. In the event there is a desire of the majority of the Town Council to re-examine the location of the Library Project, it is important that a final determination be made in the near future in order to keep this project on track. Brent Sinclair, Project Manager for the Oro Valley Library Project will make a brief presentation regarding a rough estimate as to what would be involved should the Library Project be relocated from its present location to somewhere on the Copper Creek Ridge Park property or the Naranja Town Site property. FISCAL IMPACT: Unknown ATTACHMENTS: None RECOMMENDATION: None at this time SUGGESTED MOTION: None CIL/ fl Town Manager DECISION MATRIX CURRENT SITE PROS • MOST EXPEDIENT • SHARED USE FACILITY • GOOD GENERAL LOCATION CONS • COSTLY ACCESS ON TO NARANJA • SHARED USE FACILITY • LIMITS FUTURE EXPANSION ON TOWN FACILITIES DECISION MATRIX NARANJA SITE PROS • FREES UP SPACE FOR FUTURE EXPANSION AT EXISTING TOWN HALL • GOOD CENTRAL LOCATION • GOOD PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POTENTIAL FROM C.C. SCHOOL, COPPER CREEK AND MONTERRA DEVELOPMENTS • MOMENTUM BUILDER FOR THE ENTIRE SITE • CREATES THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A CULTURAL/RECREATIONAL/LEARNING CENTER AT ONE SITE CONS • TIME DELAY OF SIX MONTHS (+) (-) • ADDL. COST FOR DESIGN SERVICES • SITE DEVELOPED W/O MASTER PLAN • UNKNOWNS (IGA WITH COUNTY) • POSITIVES TO NARANJA SITE "A" • EXCELLENT VIEWS • UTILIZE EXISTING DESIGN ELEMENTS • IMMEDIATE STREET ACCESS • DIRECT ACCESS TO 12" WATER MAIN • DIRECT ACCESS TO 10" SEWER MAIN • GOOD PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCESS FROM TWO MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS • PROXIMITY TO COPPER CREEK SCHOOL • POSSIBILITY OF SHARED PARKING WITH SCHOOL • IMPACT LESS THAN PLANNED LIGHTED BALLFIELDS AND COURTS NEGATIVES • MAIN ACCESS DRIVE COST COST FACTORS CURRENT SITE NARANJA SITE CURRENT ESTIMATED COST: $5,000,000 $5,000,000 NARANJA ACCESS DRIVE: 275,000 ? ADDL. DESIGN SERVICES: 0 <100,000 ADDL.SITE DEVELOPMENT: 0 ? EXPENSES INCURRED TO DATE: 70,000 PAM MASTER PLAN . . , , .. . .. ..,:.,- ....„ ... •• ... __ _ V r.1.7....,:,11 • %N...Ell,..4T, ,-,,,,,..' - .- 7 -6 --.--- ,,„,....w.,-,.;,:...„..__._._ 1, , 4. e,, ,-co-: :-te:- :-..,q0' :ii; t .,,,, — ..:-. , ..-- .,..17 N:I RAI•..R7--; I -COMR V.-, 1,..I.RICINI,1 or ."•.•.; e- "-- :6, ?....-‘,---- mi,"„„„s.,-4.,.,,,,,, t ! h t/217 ',Milli-7,ra, '..,:.LL) 4 49 - Pc.,A.,cA,,, -4..), ,i, ,,,,,&) (r),,,,-- _,.._... r‘,v,4 ._.. ,:.is:s.,,,,,m_..-•„,_ olp gip c-,,,. ,,ito()% . (*), 3.4-4,.., -..,,, iii,•wv'te_____,-,e..0.ifFr.11._I.__I.:_.c:__1 1 .,2 rae ... vd-w . . - 1.1,0 __-_&,.(i)e),,,„, (,)s .„..c.,..• 00 (i) ,,,,, <> ©,,,.41.,E,e, ecei..t) e. -e- e air--,,Le.)-1—" •• - I ,,.._____7„.., ,,,e,,,,,,. 0 cr__,,,, ' .— p.- - 1, - . -Acem• I..--,,' .1_ . i .,' I • liC;9 Ili\ '7,,..., 1 ,,,, -. ,'. ' -- 1 •• _SF t7 V.-...1 4110 l';----. al-. , '''''`''K... / arra-LFActi._ t— 0 0 i-- - ' 6 ei I-0 t . MI!)WM i tx-o---5 • , 8.,...,,,,.,,,,,,,,, •‘ 0 0 -PASTDICL71/1.,LW PAM \ke • 0 . '7' t, fOal.:1) Op) • 1, tic iv'v. . .,.•.; I • - •,---.li,,, 1 ., I• • • '''' — _____--- ._---_—______ —,.._ _.- .-•,-,--, -, - igitt, • „ __.. .. -ee•..--.1-s•.• ., , • :. , •.• I t - 8•V til-p,.0-0.MVITir..E•VSEMTH • //-''• gn40% D ,,''..------.-1 Cb 1 ee 03 0,i'''': t),\* a.,- if,,....-,- e .,;;;,:... 4* . .z.v f_.... -••-- .4a,, ..,. - a /.:,e , •-•,.. • ., ' , ._____ / , ft, /., C.'4 ..... i ';',/...ft:".•- .N., , ,,,...., ...Ai ..... . , -•• . ..- r i ••t.M.,7,1 '-±,:":7;-..-/...-•- \ ,:‘ ri2 • -P.M 1R177PL:-11T.P.an• i- , i .., 1 , t ,,•0 . , ,Tht, vc.e. ..,. ,,,,,..,..— _"4- 6 % i Qiti-4.) 0 ., .1 it 4 '... V..1..1 4,k:101.1 . •''......' ...,:-..iflt.' W,••‘ t''''-; '13 ,‹ EJ es t-, z) 6 r-., co ...—•-, ,,)... ..4:4.: 6 4iii .,: .:. -., .,,,:::':.,..,-,,,,,,......„,,,..,0--E-0.---(Ti-,-,-.„.„.,•oc,..„.... .,,,, -,-AP-: L LNDS-EICNEDm-rat.u. i8 4101Q0 '°' ,-.7---•.-.---,-F•4:-.•_---,''•:..i.,.'"•-.'-'-':...:•'k i i V ••••qt...,:. c' •• 7 iily - 6 ''' -•"-^'•-'1-•'.".%-'-•;'.- •••,------' -'-'.;',..,----:- E . -,., .7?e ,,,,,,,....,:t,,-_,-., - 6 fi, ......-__. _4,6 _ „..____ ....---.4 -......- 3--- , -`•,-•-:-: - .i..:-.....•-:,`L.,..-- ,,,4-c,...-,'.....:•,-. t-g, .i.....,,*'''•-•.1:'''' to 0 6 0 if- " 6 ___ ___--....17-7 C....-•..2.•.,..._,• ''`.i':--;•,:i,,,,., '0 L. . , . . - ::::,..'.---.•--;i=2;.•..4..----,::-.;'..,..: • .--,iy - --- 4-';'ird 4 it) to I .."fl• ''',§ .. .,2*-:,'-',7.--,,,, ..,.,..:;-,,iii.44i....,--.....,...•14 0 .--_ :-.4..;. . .itirt.-: f!!'2-• .._,•_,-,:'- - -•:: 4 ,„,...... ----,,-,-, v..,_. :..-,:-.7-_-----.-',..i:, _. ••----:2„--.-.,-;.-i„,- .-_,._..„..::.-,11-.:.-, •, • ,,,..., ..-toitS (19 —',If'F 40 .'JO' • ' ':-' i..., ,.....,...-, 4, r.i,, • .•• . . \_ .,.;,-.-*J.:3::-,, ,..., iy4o,, t_.,......„,,..,..„ 0 -6 -,-,.. -,.-.....,,,I..... .,,, 0 ,._, f, ,r.,,rw, ,-, -,-, - -... ---...!.. „._ , ,,f,, FE\CI _ 6 i wr -..i. ... ..-, ' -:--.-.:,,,,.:,--1_..,-,-..,..._-...--.-_.-:‘,'..'_ ‘"''' ',.,`,1e...1'. .E.:::23 • .:It..8 - 6 6 "' , --INntilLon a mniti .• '''''e_ti 6 ( _ ,,,.:.- _ - - _ .a ,1 - ,..--_-_,,,,,:7,-•;..,',..=....;_,-,•-,.." Ei . ___ ... ,--1-' . _,..., _ , a • 4 ,,,1 .... ...., L -- '-').*.- ,..... „............._ 6 0, _. a 1 fil En= ,.•..... .... 11,1cGANN&ASSOCIATES, INC. . LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS Exhibit 2-A Page 2-2