Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Conceptual Design Review Board - 4/10/2012 MINUTES ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REGULAR SESSION APRIL 10, 2012 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER AT OR AFTER 6:00 P.M. Chairman Sakellar called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dino Sakellar, Chairman Richard Luckett, Vice Chair Gil Alexander, Member Nathan Basken, Member Rachel Childers, Member Kit Donley, Member Harold Linton, Member EXCUSED: Richard Eggerding, Member David Alter, Member ALSO PRESENT: Joe Hornat, Councilmember Lou Waters, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Sakellar led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance CALL TO AUDIENCE Chairman Sakellar opened the Call to Audience with no speakers. 1. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE AND ALTERNATIVE PARKING RATIO FOR THE ENCANTADA AT STEAM PUMP APARTMENTS (0V1212-01) Malt Michels, Senior Planner, presented the following: Location Map Steam Pump Village Overview Conceptual Site Plan Conceptual Site Design Principles Town Owned Mesquite Bosque Parcel: Proposed Improvements Alternative Parking Analysis 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 1 of 11 Conceptual Landscape Plan Addendum A Design Standards Summary/Recommendation Architectural Design Principles Conceptual Design Principles Site Section Leasing Office & Coffee House/Bistro Elevations View of site from CDO Trail View of site from Oracle Road Addendum A Design Standards Proposed Color/Material Palette Public Participation Process Neighborhood Questions & Concerns Summary/Recommendations Mike Censky, applicant, representing HSL Properties, addressed the following: Color Palette Roof Colors Parking Ratio Lighting Impacts Decorative Features on Building Will Loesche, Golder Ranch Fire Marshall, responded to the Board's fire safety concerns regarding large trees on the west elevations. The following public comment was made: Bill Adler, Oro Valley Resident, commented on parking for the site, people and recreation ratio, window tinting and avoiding open stairwells. MOTION: A motion was made by Richard Luckett, Vice Chair and seconded by Rachel Childers, Member to recommend approval of the Conceptual Site Plan for Encantada at Steam Pump Village, subject to the conditions of Part I in Attachment#1, finding that the proposed Conceptual Site Plan meets the applicable Design Principles, Design Standards and Steam Pump Village PAD criteria. Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Encantada at Steam Pump Village Apartments OV1212-01 Part I: Conceptual Site Plan Engineering: 1. 11a traffic signal is warranted at the Rams Field Pass intersection, a crosswalk with pedestrian signal heads shall be required due to the construction of the last phase of Steam Pump Village. 2. Provide connections from the crosswalk that will not be impeded by access 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 2 of 11 gates to: • the existing multi-use path • the bosque park, and • the remainder of the Steam Pump Village development to be provided along the front of the property that connects to the coffee house area of the development. 3. A transit stop is required for the overall Steam Pump Village development. Continued coordination with Town staff is required to determine an acceptable location for the transit stop. An agreed upon location shall be required prior to final approval of the Final Site Plan. Planning: 1. Provide landscaped open space calculation on the Conceptual Site Plan. 2. All proposed aerial fire apparatus lanes must be approved by the Golder Ranch Fire District. 3. In exchange for use of Town property for drainage purposes, the applicant shall work with the Town to design landscaping and other improvements (i.e. parking, primitive trail, seating, pedestrian connection to the CDO trail, etc.) to the Town-owned parcel and shall execute an agreement for the installation and maintenance of said improvements. 4. Trees will be limited to species with a mature height of no more than 15 feet in areas around fire aerial apparatus access lanes, including parking islands in front of fire lanes. 5. Refuse areas must be screened with a 6-foot opaque screen painted to match the buildings and additional vegetative screening must be provided around all refuse areas to shield them from view from Oracle Road and the CDO trail. 6. Provide a pedestrian connection from Encantada to the mesquite bosque park. MOTION carried, 6-1 with Harold Linton, Member opposed. MOTION: A motion was made by Richard Luckett, Vice Chair and seconded by Nathan Basken, Member to approve the Alternative Parking Ratio for Encantada at Steam Pump Village apartments, finding that the proposed Alternative Parking Ratio meets the applicable Zoning Code Review criteria. MOTION: A motion was made by Richard Luckett, Vice Chair and seconded by Nathan Basken, Member to amend the previous motion to read: to approve the Alternative Parking Ratio for Encantada at Steam Pump Village apartments, finding that the proposed Alternative Parking Ratio meets the appropriate Zoning Code requirements. MOTION carried, 5-2 with Gil Alexander, Member, and Harold Linton, Member opposed. MOTION: A motion was made by Nathan Basken, Member and seconded by Richard Luckett, Vice Chair to recommend approval of the Conceptual Architecture for Encantada at Steam Pump Village apartments, subject to the conditions of Part II in Attachment#1, finding that the proposed Conceptual Architecture meets the applicable Design Principles and Design Standards. 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 3 of 11 Chairman Sakellar added a friendly amendment to require shade elements on western elevations as approved by staff. MOTION: A motion was made by Nathan Basken, Member and seconded by Richard Luckett, Vice Chair to amend the previous motion to read: to recommend approval of the Conceptual Architecture for Encantada at Steam Pump Village apartments, subject to the conditions of Part II in Attachment#1, finding that the proposed Conceptual Architecture meets the applicable Design Principles and Design Standards, and to include a requirement of shade elements on the western elevations as approved by staff. Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Encantada at Steam Pump Village Apartments OV1212-01 Part II: Conceptual Architecture 1. Provide shade devices or additional canopy trees on all west facing facades on Buildings#3, 7, 9, and 11 to address heat gain concerns and to limit lighting impacts on neighbors to the west. 2. Provide horizontal banding between the first and second floors of the buildings to break up the verticality of the buildings. 3. Provide a decorative feature above the stairwell entry porticos. 4. Provide a color palette including at least three (3) related or complementary hues add variety and avoid the monotonous repetition of the same color. The same color scheme shall not be repeated on adjacent buildings or buildings directly across from each other. 5. A plan depicting the view of the rooftop mechanical equipment from the adjacent neighborhood, with required screening to conceal the equipment must be submitted for review and approval of staff. 6. A plan depicting the entry feature(s) must be submitted for review and approval by staff. MOTION carried, 6-1 with Gil Alexander, Member opposed. 2. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE FOR PROPOSED GAS STATION AND RESTAURANT (0V121 1-14) Rosevelt Arellano, Planner, presented the following: Request Summary Location map Overview of Proposal Conceptual Site Plan Fry's Gas Station: Tangerine Road Conceptual Site Design Principles Conceptual Design Principles 04/03 PZC conditions of Approval for CUP 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 4 of 11 Design Principles Addendum A Design Standards Existing Nearby Illumination Landscape Areas Circulation Conceptual Architecture Existing Architecture Mercado Center Architectural Design Principles Addendum A Design Standards Proposed Color/Material Palette Summary/Recommendation Jeff Guyette, applicant, representing Fry's Food and Drug Real Estate Department, addressed the following: Trash Enclosures Four Sided Architecture Pump Numbers Tapered Columns The following public comments were made: Jim Harrison, Oro Valley Resident, spoke in opposition of the Conceptual Site Plan Michael Sanford, Oro Valley Resident, voiced his concerns on the following: landscaping and pedestrian walkways. Steve Jones, Oro Valley Resident, voiced his concerns on the following: lighting, landscaping and noise. Mike Prout, Oro Valley Resident, voiced his concerns on pedestrian walkway safety. David Laws, Permitting Manager, explained how the Engineering staff determined the traffic volume for that area. MOTION: A motion was made by Gil Alexander, Member and seconded by Nathan Basken, Member recommend approval of the Conceptual Site Plan for a gas station and restaurant as Lots 8 & 9, Mercado at Canada Hills, with the Conditions in Attachment 1, Part I, findings that the Conceptual Site Plan meets the applicable Conceptual Site Design Principles, and to include the following conditions; remove Planning Condition number 2, make a change number 5 that the six foot high screen wall be a part of the restaurant site and not required for the gas station. Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Conceptual Design Gas Station and Restaurant at Mercado at Canada Hills 04/10/20 12 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 5 of 11 OV1312-02 Part 1: Conceptual Site Plan Engineering: 1. As currently designed, the access aisle for the accessible parking space is positioned within the P.A.A.L. Relocate the access aisle so that it does not require a disabled individual to load and unload within the an unprotected P.A.A.L. This can be accomplished in the following manner: • Provide a sidewalk within the raised island located adjacent to the north side of the parking space. This will require that the island be widened to 6' to fit a 5'-wide sidewalk. • Extend the curb return to the east so that the bull nose lines up with the curb line to the north. Provide a 45 degree transition for access into the accessible parking space. • Provide a 5'-wide crosswalk from the raised island to the kiosk area. • Stripe the pavement on the west side of the accessible parking space as shown to delineate the vehicular path from the parking area. See redlines on sheet 1 for additional information. 2. Provide an accessible route from within the boundary of the site that connects with the rest of the site and the public right-of-way. 3. Provide appropriate sight visibility triangles (SVT's) at PAAL intersections on the Conceptual Site Plan and the Conceptual Landscape Plan. Refer to the redlined Conceptual Site Plan drawings for locations and dimensions of SVT's required for this project. 4. Indicate the location of the proposed trash enclosure on the site plan. Planning: 1. A sidewalk shall be added to the northern and western elevations of the proposed restaurant. 2. A w w w ! r Z r' r w r ! r • ! . r•! "• - . ! Z 2 : 11 3. The Conceptual Site Plan shall be revised to indicate a six foot wide landscape/pedestrian area around the kiosk. 4. Outdoor seating area that provides at least a shaded bench must be provided for the restaurant. 5. A shared refuse storage area with a six foot high screen wall must be provided FOR THE RESTAURANT SITE BUT NOT REQUIRED FOR THE i • gas station, and located so that it would be shielded from view from the roadway by the future restaurant building. 6. A note shall be added to the Conceptual Site Plan indicating that merchandising displays around the kiosk are limited to two feet wide. 7. Planters are required at the north, east, and west elevations of the kiosk building, and adjacent to the pumps. 8. If construction costs for Lot 8, Lot 9, and Lot 3 exceed $1,034,403, the applicant must submit a proposal for additional public art. 9. The Conceptual Site plan must be revised to reflect required 26 parking spaces, and 20 provided spaces. 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 6 of 11 10. The five foot wide separation area between the restaurant and gas station should be lengthened and landscaped. 11. A ten foot wide landscape area must be included at the northern, southern, and western elevations of the proposed restaurant. For the kiosk, this requirement may be met by providing a six foot wide stamped concrete area around the building. 12.Four bicycle parking spaces located on Lot 9 in previously approved DP/Preliminary Plat must be included. 13.Final Site Plan must be incorporated into the previously approved Development Plan/Preliminary Plat as an "Amended Development Plan," and include a cover sheet, updated layout for the Mercado at Canada Hills center, and updated parking analysis. 14.Additional information items must be added to the Final Site Plan, as noted in the March 9, 2012 comment letter and Conceptual Site Plan submittal checklist. 15.Final Site Plan must include an updated parking analysis and provided open space for Mercado at Canada Hills center. 16.Final Site Plan must address comments from Golder Ranch Fire District dated February 29, 2012, and Oro Valley Water dated February 13, 2012. 17.An amended Final Plat must be submitted for revision of the location of the lot line between lots 8 & 9. MOTION: A motion was made by Nathan Basken, Member and seconded by Kit Donley, Member recommend approval of the Conceptual Architecture for a gas station at Lots 8, Mercado at Canada Hills, with the Conditions in Attachment 1, Part 2, numbers 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, findings that the Conceptual Architecture meets the applicable Conceptual Architectural Design Principles. MOTION carried, 7-0. Part 2: Conceptual Architecture 1. The projecting flags shall be replaced with another method for labeling pump number. 2 _ • L A '• .1.i + •• + A • • " ! • +• • A w A • r r w A A A w • • • A A • - • 2 ' ! • e Y A A • A • - 3 • A • . _ _ _ • • 1� .t �� A A ! � ! + A w A _ A + • AJ • • A � �• �• r • • rR 4. A paint color for the gas station canopy roof shall be provided to minimize reflectivity and blend with the paint color of the side of the structure. 5. The height of the architectural elements on the gas station canopy must be confirmed. 6. Light Reflectivity Values shall be provided for all paint colors. 7. Specifications for the slump block shall be provided to match the block of the existing Mercado at Canada Hills center. MOTION carried, 7-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Gil Alexander, Member and seconded by Rachel Childers, Member recommend to Town Council to limit the hours of operation of the gas 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 7 of 11 station to equal the supermarket hours of operation and lighting standards meet the minimum IES standards for a gas station. Chairman Sakellar added a friendly amendment that if the IES Standards are brighter, the lesser would be acceptable MOTION carried, 5-2 with Nathan Basken, Member, and Harold Linton, Member opposed. 3. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING: a. PAD EXEMPTION FROM THE CURRENT SIGN GUIDELINES FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV3I 1-005) b. A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV312-01) Matt Michels, Senior Planner, presented the following: -Request Summary: PAD Exemption & Master Sign Program (MSP) -PAD Sign Exemption -Rooney Ranch PAD -Sign Code: PAD Exemption -Conclusion/Recommendation Mark Jones, applicant, representing Fluoresco Lighting and Signs, presented the following: Current Signs Proposed Signs Site Plan Sign Guidelines Color Palette MOTION: A motion was made by Harold Linton, Member and seconded by Nathan Basken, Member to defer any action until such time the applicant can present both Areas' at the same time. MOTION failed, 2-5 with Nathan Basken, Member, and Harold Linton, Member in favor. MOTION: A motion was made by Gil Alexander, Member and seconded by Kit Donley, Member recommend approval of the request for a PAD Exemption from the Rooney Ranch Area D Sign Guidelines with the Conditions in Attachment 1 and to include the following condition: Sign areas should meet existing Oro Valley Code Standards. Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 8 of 11 Rooney Ranch Area D Request for Approval of PAD Exemption/Master Sign Program 0V311-06, OV312-001 1. The Master Sign Program shall not become effective unless the proposed PAD Exemption for Rooney Ranch Area D is approved. 2. On page 4 of the Master Sign Program, 1.0. should be revised to read: "No signage will be allowed on the rear of Anchor, Major, and Minor Buildings." 3. On page 3, "B" shall be removed from the title and from the first paragraph text. 4. On page 4, the phrase "Freestanding Signage" in the first heading should be removed. 5. On page 5, the first paragraph is repeated; one should be removed. 6. On page D-5a, "Anchor Tenant- Color," the phrase "Commercial color specifications to be provided" should be deleted. MOTION carried, 7-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Gil Alexander, Member and seconded by Kit Donley, Member for approval of the request for the PAD Exemption from the Rooney Ranch Area D Sign Guidelines with the Conditions in Attachment 1 and to include the following condition: Sign areas should meet existing Oro Valley Code Standards. Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Rooney Ranch Area D Request for Approval of PAD Exemption/Master Sign Program OV311-06, OV312-001 1. The Master Sign Program shall not become effective unless the proposed PAD Exemption for Rooney Ranch Area D is approved. 2. On page 4 of the Master Sign Program, 1.0. should be revised to read: "No signage will be allowed on the rear of Anchor, Major, and Minor Buildings." 3. On page 3, "B" shall be removed from the title and from the first paragraph text. 4. On page 4, the phrase "Freestanding Signage" in the first heading should be removed. 5. On page 5, the first paragraph is repeated; one should be removed. 6. On page D-5a, "Anchor Tenant- Color," the phrase"Commercial color specifications to be provided" should be deleted. MOTION carried, 7-0. 4. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR HOHOKAM MESA/VISTOSO TOWN CENTER SUBDIVISION IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 6 (OV1312O2) Matt Michels, Senior Planner, presented the following: 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 9 of 11 Conceptual Architecture Review Location Map: Vistoso Town Center Site Map Context: Adjacent to Honey Bee Village Archaeological Preserve Applicant's Proposal Typical Design Features Architectural Design Principles Addendum "A" Design Standards Summary Conditions of Approval Michel Isles, applicant, representing Meritage Homes, presented a brief overview of architecture. MOTION: A motion was made by Gil Alexander, Member and seconded by Kit Donley, Member to approve with conditions, Model Home Architecture (Plans 2278; 3046; 3222; 3579; 3617; and 4328) for Hohokam MesaNistoso Town Center Lots 1-6, 15-19, 47-52, 53-63, 71-107 and 108-128, subject to the conditions specified in Attachment#3, finding that the proposed Model Home Architecture meets the applicable Zoning Code Review criteria. ATTACHMENT#3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HOHOKAM MESA MODEL HOMES OV1312-02 April 10, 2012 1. A front courtyard wall (at least 3' in height) must be provided for each one-story home. Courtyard walls shall be finished with materials and colors from the approved palette or other appropriate material, as approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator, using approved styles. 2. The wainscoting shall continue around the side of each home to the side yard fence return or gate. As an alternative, the side yard fence return or gate can be brought forward towards the front of the home. 3. The rear yard wall and subdivision perimeter wall shall contain design elements and materials derived from the Honey Bee Preserve perimeter wall. 4. Window sills shall be provided on all side and rear façade windows. 5. Stone veneer or other accent material(s) as approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator shall be a standard feature for all Ranch Territorial elevations. MOTION carried, 7-0. 5. PLANNING MANAGER'S UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 10 of 11 David Williams, Planning Division Manager, presented the following: Karen Berchtold leaving Oro Valley Spring Community Academy Staff is reviewing a pre-application submittal for a Major General Plan Amendment for Desert Springs Sign Code Amendment was approved by Council and in effect Neighborhood Meetings: Desert Springs, April 12th, PAD for Rulney property Community Outreach Forum Future Agenda Items: May 8th, Canada Hills Shopping Center Sign Criteria ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Rachel Childers, Member and seconded by Gil Alexander, Member adjourn the meeting at 9:24 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. Prepared by: :il Roseanne Flores Recording Secretary I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the conceptual Design Review Board of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the jpitday of ,I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. 04/10/2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 11 of 11 MINUTES ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STUDY SESSION APRIL 10, 2012 KACHINA CONFERENCE ROOM 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER AT OR AFTER 5:00 P.M. Chairman Sakellar called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dino Sakellar, Chairman Richard Luckett, Vice Chair Gil Alexander, Member Nathan Basken, Member Rachel Childers, Member Kit Donley, Member Harold Linton, Member EXCUSED: Richard Eggerding, Member David Alter, Member ALSO PRESENT: Joe Hornat, Councilmember Lou Waters, Councilmember 1. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (CDRB) REVIEW GUIDE TO ASSIST THE CDRB IN THE REVIEW, RECOMMENDATION AND/OR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN SUBMITTALS David Williams, Planning Division Manager, presented the following: - Purpose of the Manual - Contents of the Manual - Use of Manual - Detailed Review During Upcoming Community Academy Member Basken showed up at 5:25 p.m. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Kit Donley, Member and seconded by Gil Alexander, Member adjourn the meeting at 5:31 p.m. 04/10/2010 Conceptual Design Review Board Study Session Page 1 of 2 MOTION carried, 7-0. repared by: Dio-0477/Y /9 N-.77J,Q Roseanne Flores Recording Secretary I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regul r session of the Conceptual Design Review Board of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the jP(day of 01)/j2/ 200,1 further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. 04/10/2010 Conceptual Design Review Board Study Session Page 2 of 2